This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §365 of International Application PCT/EP01/02314, filed Mar. 1, 2001, which claims the benefit of European Application No. 00400622.7, filed Mar. 3, 2000.
The present invention is related to a demultiplexing device and process for at least two transport streams or TS, as well as to associated applications.
In emerging digital applications and especially in new generations of Set-Top-Boxes or Digital Television Sets, the presence of more than one digital front-ends enables new services to the end-customer. In particular, viewing one program while recording another one on a digital media is a very strong demand from end-customers, since that functionality was natural in the analogue world, with a TV set together with a VCR (Video Cassette Recorder).
This implies that the digital system be able to process two different transport streams, coming from the two digital front-ends. The immediate answer to that is to implement two demultiplexers in the system.
Now, most of the digital MPEG decoders today only support one transport stream input and demultiplexing.
The present invention concerns a demultiplexing device for at least two transport streams, notably from respectively at least two front-ends, enabling the use of a number of demultiplexers that is lower than the number of transport streams.
The invention also relates to a corresponding demultiplexing process having the advantage above and to applications of the demultiplexing device and process.
It is further concerned with a digital TV receiver comprising a demultiplexing device according to the invention and to a digital stream able to be produced in such a demultiplexing device.
This is achieved by means of the demultiplexing device defined in claim 1 and the demultiplexing process defined in claim 10.
Indeed, a typical Transport Stream data rate is in the order of 40 to 60 Mb/s, while the Integrated Circuit (IC) technology currently in use allows for demultiplexers to run fast enough to process transport streams with data rates exceeding 100 Mb/s. So, it is taken advantage of the higher capacity of the demultiplexers to process two different and separate streams of about 40 to 60 Mb/s with a single demultiplexer. Namely, two incident streams are merged into a single one before being injected into a demultiplexer. This operation is performed in a merging unit.
An identifier is added to each incident packet to enable the demultiplexer to recognize to which original stream it belongs. This is useful since the same PIDs (for “Packet Identifiers”) can be present in both (or more involved) streams.
The present invention is particularly appropriate for Set-Top-Boxes (e.g. stand-alone digital satellite, cable or terrestrial receivers/decoders) or Digital Television Sets (e.g. including the digital receiver/decoder functionality).
Preferably, the originating transport streams carry the same type of information, such as audio video data advantageously coded according to an MPEG standard, like for example MPEG2 or MPEG4. Thereby, the processing by the demultiplexing device can be more efficient.
Preferred embodiments of the demultiplexing device are defined in dependent claims 2 to 9.
Notably, one advantageous possibility is to use the “transport_priority_bit” which is located in the header of each transport packet, to mark each packet. This bit would be forced to “0” in all the packets coming from one stream and forced to “1” in all the packets coming from the other stream. The demultiplexer has thus to filter not only on the 13-bit PID, but also on the “transport_priority_bit”. As that “transport_priority_bit” belongs to the same byte as the upper bits of the PID, it is very easy to modify the PID filter to extend the filtering to that bit (most of the current demultiplexers already support the filtering of that bit).
According to other embodiments, not implying the “transport_priority_bit”, each packet coming out of the merging unit is preceded or followed by a “tag”, which can be a number of bits showing which is the original stream that packet belonged to.
It is then interesting that the “tag” also carries a time stamp corresponding to the time at which the corresponding packet reached the merging unit, helping to implement solution B described below.
The process of merging two (or more) streams into a single one can be done in various ways. Some logic with a limited amount of memory is necessary to perform this operation. A typical algorithm is to have a FIFO memory for each incoming bit stream and each time a complete packet has arrived it is output to the demultiplexer. The size of the FIFO is typically two transport packets.
The two (or more) incident streams can have different bit rates. The frequency of the clock to output packets to the demultiplexer must be at least the sum of the frequencies of the two (or more) incident streams.
Typically, each of the incident streams has its own 27 MHz clock time base. The clock recovery is advantageously performed on the stream that is decoded and displayed directly. In variants, two (or more) independent 27 MHz clock recovery modules are implemented.
The following applies to each individual (for example 27 MHz) clock recovery. Several alternative approaches A, B and C are considered. It should be noted that they can be combined, insofar as some of them are used for a part of the merging units, and different ones for other merging units.
A—The POR (for “Program Clock Reference”) values are not modified and the local clock is sampled when the packet reaches the demultiplexer: packets carrying the PCR may have some jitter with regard to their theoretical arrival time. The clock recovery system has to absorb the jitter.
B—The local clock is sampled when the incident packet reaches the merging unit: no jitter is introduced.
C—The POR values of the packets carrying PCR are modified according to the time spent in the merging unit.
According to a first implementation of the demultiplexing set, the merging circuitry is used with an external IC between the front-end delivering the TS and the back-end-IC performing the demultiplexing. According to a second implementation, the merging circuitry is embedded in the back-end IC, upstream from the demultiplexer.
The invention is particularly interesting for two transport streams. However, it is also applicable to three or more TS. Then, preferably, either all the TS are processed by means of a single merging unit and a single demultiplexer (DMX), or they are grouped by couples and processed by means of respective merging units and DMX, or both techniques are combined.
The invention will be detailed and illustrated by means of the following non-limiting examples, with reference to the appended Figures, on which:
On the figures, similar elements of various embodiments are denoted by the same references.
A demultiplexing device 1 (
In a particular embodiment, the streams 24-28 are coded streams in the form of TS, the back-end 13 being coupled with a decoder and/or a storing support. The demultiplexing device 1 thus enables to select a particular program to be displayed on screen after decoding and another program to be stored simultaneously on a hard disk drive (HDD) in a compressed form. In another embodiment, a decoder is incorporated in the back-end 13, so that the streams 24-28 carry decoded programs.
The demultiplexing device 1 comprises a merging unit 2 for merging the input TS 21 and 22 and producing a merged TS 23, and a demultiplexer (DMX) 3 for demultiplexing the latter as a whole.
The merging unit 2 is intended:
In the represented embodiment, the merging unit 2 is separated from the back-end 13 IC, and is incorporated on another specific IC. In a variant, it is incorporated in the back-end 13 IC.
The merging unit 2 essentially comprises two FIFO memories 5 and 6 respectively intended to receive the incoming TS 21 and 22, a merging block 4 including marking means, and a control unit 7 for controlling the elements of the merging unit 2. The size of each of the FIFO memories 5 and 6 is for example twice the size of the packets P1 or P2. The control unit 7 provides that a packet is output from any of the memories 5 and 6 only when, and as soon as, a complete packet has already arrived therein.
The merging block 4 marks the received packets P1 and P2 and delivers the corresponding packets P′1 and P′2, in the order in which it receives the incoming packets P1 and P2 from the FIFO memories 5 and 6. Namely, the packets of both input TS 21 and 22 are arranged in their reception order in the merged TS 23, and are not sorted. As a variant, the packets P′1 and P′2 are delivered according not only to their reception order, but also to given criteria. For example, priority levels given by a user for the respective TS 21 and 22 (in fact for the corresponding wished programs) are used, each packet being associated with a coefficient resulting from a weighting of the arrival order and from the priority level.
In a first embodiment of the marking means of the merging block 4 (
In a second embodiment of the marking means of the merging block 4 (
The DMX 3, incorporated in the back-end 13, is intended to receive the merged TS 23 and to demultiplex it, by:
Then, the demultiplexer 3 is able to produce the output streams 24-28 corresponding unambiguously to different programs. Indeed, even if a same PID is used in TS 21 and TS 22 for respectively two programs, the DMX 3 identifies also the originating TS 21 or 22. Moreover, the mere DMX 3 is thereby enough for demultiplexing at the same time both TS 21 and 22.
Clock recovery will be now detailed in reference to three embodiments represented on
According to the second embodiment (
According to the third embodiment (
A demultiplexing device 1 (
In another embodiment of a demultiplexing device, referred to by 10 (
The merging unit 81 is intended to receive the TS 61 and 62 from the front-ends 14 and 15 and to produce a merged TS 65, in a similar way as in the previous embodiment. Also, DMX 83 is intended to receive the merged stream 65 and to demultiplex it as a whole, so as to produce the output streams 67 to 69 respectively associated with programs carried by the input TS 61 and 62. Likewise, the merging unit 82 is intended to receive the TS 63 and 64 from the front-ends 16 and 17 and to produce a merged TS 66, while DMX 84 is intended to demultiplex that merged TS 66 and to produce the output streams 70 to 73. The demultiplexing device 10 is thus shared in two parts (merging unit 81 and DMX 83 on one hand, merging unit 82 and DMX 84 on the other hand), each of them having the features of any of the embodiments described above for the demultiplexing device 1.
In variants, the demultiplexing device comprises a merging unit, which is able to merge more than two TS, for example three or four TS. This involves however that the associated demultiplexer has the capacity to demultiplex in due time the obtained merged stream (high speed processing).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
00400622 | Mar 2000 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP01/02314 | 3/1/2001 | WO | 00 | 9/3/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/65831 | 9/7/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5566174 | Sato et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5825430 | Adolph et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5905732 | Fimoff et al. | May 1999 | A |
6035037 | Chaney | Mar 2000 | A |
6940876 | Crinon | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7023992 | Kubota et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 106 770 | Apr 1984 | EP |
661 888 | Jul 1995 | EP |
661888 | Jul 1995 | EP |
9607267 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9728652 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9816067 | Apr 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030031211 A1 | Feb 2003 | US |