In the resource recovery industry, flow control devices and particularly inflow control devices are widely used to manage fluid flows into the wellbore system. Many are viscosity-based devices and these work well for their intended purposes but do not provide sufficient discriminatory action for all applications. The art would well receive alternate technologies that improve control.
An embodiment of an inflow control device including a valve responsive to pressure inputs, and a fluid discriminator having a first structure that supports a first flow regime and a second structure that changes the flow regime to exhibit a higher pressure, a first pressure tap at the first structure and a second pressure tap at the second structure, the taps experiencing a differential pressure that is different for water and for oil flowing through the discriminator, and the first and second pressure taps connected to the valve.
An embodiment of a borehole system, including a borehole in a subsurface formation, a string in the borehole, and an inflow control device disposed within or as a part of the string.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the disclosed apparatus and method are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation with reference to the Figures.
Referring to
The reservoir fluid, or any other fluid, that flows in the configuration 16 will experience friction and turbulence along the configuration. Resultantly, fluid flowing in the configuration 16 will exhibit a lower pressure than that of the source fluid. The magnitude of the change in pressure is related to the density of the fluid that is flowing in the configuration 16.
As illustrated, the discriminator 14 further includes, at an end opposite the inlet end 18, a closed end 20 and another path 22 for flow that Tees off from the configuration 16 between inlet 18 and end 20. The Tee may have an inner diameter equal to, greater than, or smaller than the inner diameter of the adjacent tubes. In an embodiment, fluid flowing through configuration 16 and path 22 is ultimately either produced or inhibited depending upon the position of valve 12, which is dependent upon the pressure differential across a first pressure tap 24 and a second pressure tap 26 disposed in the discriminator 14. Path 22 could also be configured as a pilot path that remains open regardless of the inputs on the valve and different supply path would in that case act as the primary pathway when the valve 12 is open. The taps 24 and 26 experience different pressure differential based upon a density of the fluid flowing in the configuration 16. In the case of water and oil, the difference in differential pressure may be, for example, 10 pounds per square inch (PSI), depending upon the ratio of length to inside diameter of the configuration 16. The taps 24 and 26 experience a greater or lesser pressure differential depending upon a greater or lesser percentage of a target fluid (oil or water) in the source fluid connected to the discriminator 14 and flowing therethrough. The difference in differential pressure is used to cause the valve 12 to move in the direction it is desired that it move (based upon which side the P1 [associated with 24] and P2 [associated with 26] are connected to). It may be that the pressure-based movement causes the valve to close or it may be that the same pressure differential causes the valve to open. This can also be reversed by swapping the pressure tap connections. The pressure differential alone may be the only driving factor for the valve 12 in some embodiments but in other embodiments that include spring(s), the spring(s) bias may need to be overcome to move the piston or disk.
In one example, the pressure at tap 24 minus the tap pressure at tap 26 for water flowing in the configuration 16 is zero. The valve 12 will stay wherever it was or will remain biased only by the one or more springs. When oil flows through the configuration 16 however, the pressure at tap 24 minus the pressure at tap 26 will yield a nonzero result, which means that a hydraulic force will be generated on the valve 12 to move a piston or disk, for example, toward the P1 or P2 that is lower pressure than the other of P1 or P2. This, again, may be against biasers or without biasers (springs).
Resultantly, the inflow control device 10 will automatically reduce flow through the valve 12 if a nontarget fluid is the majority of fluid flowing through the discriminator 14 and automatically increase flow through the valve 12 if a target fluid is the majority of fluid flowing through the discriminator 14. In embodiments the fluid is water or oil but others could be substituted. Also, which is the target, oil or water, may be selected and the overall device 10 will function as required.
Tap 24 is positioned to be adjacent the inlet 18 such that pressure is likely the same as source pressure. It will be appreciated that flow through the configuration 16 will result in continuously reducing pressure all along the tube. Hence, the closer to the inlet 18 the better for tap 24 to ensure the pressure measured there is close to source pressure. Tap 26 is placed in a stagnation zone 28. Stagnation is where pressure is recovered due to a lack of flow, such as in a plugged tubing section extending from configuration 16, or a stagnant area of a turn in the flow, such as that illustrated between 18 and 22 (the outside corner of this flow transition will be stagnant because the flow is turning to path 22 and flow is stalled in the corner).
Selecting parameters of the configuration 16 may be accomplished by:
Calculating a Dynamic Pressure=ρ*V2/(2*gc) which is the pressure rise magnitude in the stagnation zone, P3, where flow of velocity, V, comes to a stop at a stagnation point (see
Calculating a tube length (by iterating) that gives a pressure drop along the tube (using the Darcy-Weisbach equation) equal to the dynamic pressure rise (i.e. P1-P3=0).
Slightly adjusting the tube length shorter or longer to cause there to be a pressure drop sign reversal for flowing water versus oil. An optimal ratio of tube length to tube diameter is 37.5 for a tube of 0.186 inch inner diameter. The optimal ratio increases as inner diameter increases. A range for the ratio of length to diameter of about 14 to about 58 at atmospheric pressure is sufficient to obtain the benefit of the disclosure hereof. It is noted that the optimal ratio of length to diameter may reduce by as much as 50% (range about 7 to about 29) in a well at depth as hydrostatic pressure increases in the device. This is because the higher than atmospheric pressure experienced by the discriminator induces a more streamlined flow in the Tee by eliminating effects such as cavitation. Cavitation is prevented if the outlet pressure of the device is several times greater than the change in pressure (ΔP) across the inflow control device restrictor (or any flow restriction). The term “at depth” as used herein relates to a pressure range of about 300 pounds per square inch (PSI)-about 30.000 PSI.
The Darcy-Weisbach equation referenced above is:
Selecting a tubing length and inside diameter for the configuration 16 will yield acceptable differential pressures to adequately actuate the valve 12 in a direction of the builders choosing to increase flow when a target fluid is prevalent and decrease flow when a nontarget fluid is prevalent.
An inner diameter of 0.186 inch was tested in one embodiment flowing 5.08 gpm water flow rate. A tubing length of about 6.97 inch was found to be optimal for discriminating between oil (kerosene) and water at room temperature. This is an optimal ratio of length to diameter of 37.5. The flow outlet pressure was 1 atmosphere in this embodiment and probably experienced some amount of cavitation where flow turns at the Tee. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation indicates that under higher hydrostatic pressures or higher downstream pressure, cavitation is eliminated and in this case reducing tube length by about 50% may be more optimal, for example as used in oil wells.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In
Referring to
Referring to
Set forth below are some embodiments of the foregoing disclosure:
Embodiment 1: An inflow control device including a valve responsive to pressure inputs, and a fluid discriminator having a first structure that supports a first flow regime and a second structure that changes the flow regime to exhibit a higher pressure, a first pressure tap at the first structure and a second pressure tap at the second structure, the taps experiencing a differential pressure that is different for water and for oil flowing through the discriminator, and the first and second pressure taps connected to the valve.
Embodiment 2: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the discriminator comprises a Bernoulli tube.
Embodiment 3: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the Bernoulli tube is configured with a diameter to length ratio within the range of about 14 to about 58 for pressures of about atmospheric pressure.
Embodiment 4: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the Bernoulli tube is configured with a diameter to length ratio within the range of about 7 to about 29 for pressures of about 300 pounds per square inch (PSI)-about 30,000 PSI.
Embodiment 5: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the valve is urged by the pressure differential toward an open position when oil is flowing through the discriminator.
Embodiment 6: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the valve is urged by the pressure differential toward a closed position when water is flowing through the discriminator.
Embodiment 7: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the differential pressure is at a magnitude that overcomes a spring in the valve biasing the valve to an open position.
Embodiment 8: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the valve includes a spring.
Embodiment 9: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the valve includes spring on both operative ends of a piston or a disk of the valve.
Embodiment 10: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the differential pressure is reciprocal for water vs oil.
Embodiment 11: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the valve is responsive to move away from the first or second pressure tap depending upon which one has a higher pressure.
Embodiment 12: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the second structure is a stagnation branch.
Embodiment 13: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the second structure is an expansion area.
Embodiment 14: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the valve is a disk valve.
Embodiment 15: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the valve is a piston valve.
Embodiment 16: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the piston valve is circular in cross section.
Embodiment 17: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the piston valve is noncircular in cross section.
Embodiment 18: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the piston valve is oval in cross section.
Embodiment 19: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the piston valve includes a stop.
Embodiment 20: The device as in any prior embodiment, wherein the piston valve is travel limited by a feature of a housing about a piston of the piston valve.
Embodiment 21: A borehole system, including a borehole in a subsurface formation, a string in the borehole, and an inflow control device as in any prior embodiment disposed within or as a part of the string.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Further, it should be noted that the terms “first,” “second,” and the like herein do not denote any order, quantity, or importance, but rather are used to distinguish one element from another. The terms “about”, “substantially” and “generally” are intended to include the degree of error associated with measurement of the particular quantity based upon the equipment available at the time of filing the application. For example, “about” and/or “substantially” and/or “generally” can include a range of +8% of a given value.
The teachings of the present disclosure may be used in a variety of well operations. These operations may involve using one or more treatment agents to treat a formation, the fluids resident in a formation, a borehole, and/or equipment in the borehole, such as production tubing. The treatment agents may be in the form of liquids, gases, solids, semi-solids, and mixtures thereof. Illustrative treatment agents include, but are not limited to, fracturing fluids, acids, steam, water, brine, anti-corrosion agents, cement, permeability modifiers, drilling muds, emulsifiers, demulsifiers, tracers, flow improvers etc. Illustrative well operations include, but are not limited to, hydraulic fracturing, stimulation, tracer injection, cleaning, acidizing, steam injection, water flooding, cementing, etc.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited.