Patent Grant
11660167
The present disclosure is related generally to the field of dental treatment. More particularly, the present disclosure is related to methods, instructions on a computing device readable medium, and devices with repositioning jaw elements.
Dental treatments may involve, for instance, restorative and/or orthodontic procedures. Restorative procedures may be designed to implant a dental prosthesis (e.g., a crown, bridge, inlay, onlay, veneer, etc.) intraorally in a patient. Orthodontic procedures may include repositioning misaligned teeth and changing bite configurations for improved cosmetic appearance and/or dental function. Orthodontic repositioning can be accomplished, for example, by applying controlled forces to one or more teeth over a period of time.
As an example, orthodontic repositioning may be provided through a dental process that uses positioning appliances for realigning teeth. Such appliances may utilize a thin shell of material having resilient properties, referred to as an “aligner,” that generally conforms to a patient's teeth but is slightly out of alignment with a current tooth configuration.
Placement of such an appliance over the teeth may provide controlled forces in specific locations to gradually move the teeth into a new configuration. Repetition of this process with successive appliances in progressive configurations can move the teeth through a series of intermediate arrangements to a final desired arrangement.
Such systems typically utilize materials that are light weight and/or transparent to provide as a set of appliances that can be used serially such that as the teeth move, a new appliance can be implemented to further move the teeth without having to take a new impression of the patient's teeth at every increment of tooth movement in order to make the successive appliance.
In various instances, teeth of a patient's upper jaw and teeth of the patient's lower jaw may contact in an incorrect or suboptimal manner (e.g., crowding, crossbite, deep bite). A proper fit of the occlusal surfaces of the teeth is necessary for proper biting and chewing, as well as desirable for aesthetic appearance. Otherwise, premature wear of the teeth, undesirable flexion of the teeth, and/or undesirable forces on dental restorations may be experienced by the patient. For instance, a proper fit can be a function of the relative positions of teeth and the mandible and maxilla, either of which may be retruded or protruded relative to the ideal position. The maxilla (e.g., the upper jaw) is a bone that is fixed to the skull. The mandible (e.g., lower jaw) is a bone that is attached to the skull by numerous muscles which guide its movement. The mandible articulates at its posterior upward extremities with the temporal bone to form the jaw joint. The jaw joint is a loosely connected joint that accommodates the variety of movements of the mandible relative to the maxilla during biting and chewing motions. The numerous muscles attaching the mandible to the skull control and power the complex movements involved in biting and chewing.
The position of the lower jaw is governed by at least two factors. The first factor is the best fit or seating of the condyles of the mandible within the joint housing of the temporal bone. The posterior superior most position of the condyle in the joint is usually an ideal position representing full seating. The second factor is the best fit of the teeth between the maxilla and the mandible. Ideally, the teeth fit together best in occlusion with the left and right jaw joint fully seated at the same time, but this is not a requirement. Sometimes, the teeth fit together best with the condyles slightly displaced from the joint. As a result, when the condyles are fully seated, the teeth may not be in their best fitting position. This condition is known as a shift between the centric relationship (condyles fully seated) and the centric occlusion (teeth best fitting).
Because the condylar relationship affords some flexibility in the positioning of the jaw, the lower jaw can be intentionally repositioned in accordance with the best fit of the teeth, for instance, by using an orthodontic appliance. The orthodontic appliance used may or may not be displeasing, both physically and aesthetically, to a patient undergoing treatment which intentionally repositions the lower jaw.
As discussed above, the present disclosure provides methods, instructions on computing device readable medium, and devices for repositioning jaw elements. Generally, the repositioning occurs during an orthodontic treatment which is a process of moving and reorienting teeth for functional and/or aesthetic purposes, although repositioning may be made for other purposes.
Simultaneous contacting of the upper and lower teeth on the right and left sides, and in the anterior and posterior occlusal areas with maximum interdigitation is desired for proper positioning of the lower jaw to the upper jaw in the mouth of a patient. An unbalanced occlusion, such as a malocclusion, is disruptive to the proper biting and chewing functions because excessive forces may be placed in a particular area that can lead to premature wear and/or restoration failure, or because undesirable forces such as flexion may lead to stresses which cause abfraction lesions and/or crowding/spacing of the teeth. The position of a patient's jaw can be changed, for instance, using an orthodontic appliance (e.g., a dental appliance).
Current approaches for jaw repositioning, such as those performed prior to fixed orthodontic treatment (i.e., “braces”) include having a treatment professional place an orthodontic appliance which may include block elements, wires, tensioning springs, horizontal stops, etc., which is firmly fixed to the teeth and which applies repositioning forces to move the jaw of the patient, thereby causing the relative positioning of the patient's upper and lower jaws to adjust. Some believe that this repositioning stimulates jaw growth in patients with growth potential remaining, while others believe that the muscles can re-learn a new position so long as the teeth are made to fit together well in the new jaw position. In some instances, prior approaches include a removable appliance with block elements.
Current appliances for jaw repositioning are not designed to reposition the teeth during the process of jaw repositioning. After adjustment of the position of the patient's jaw, further orthodontic treatment is performed to move and re-orientate the teeth of the patient for improved dental interdigitation, if necessary. Many of the current jaw repositioning devices can be displeasing to patients, both physically and aesthetically, because the patient does not have the option to remove the appliance even for a short period of time. Such appliances (e.g., Herbst appliance) are typically cemented into place on the patient's teeth. Depending on whether the jaw change is due to growth or muscular repositioning, realigning the teeth of a patient after repositioning the jaw can result in reversion of the position of the jaw if the teeth are not positioned and/or repositioned in a manner that best supports the new jaw position. This would occur, for example, if the teeth fit better in a jaw position different from the one which is accomplished through the jaw repositioning phase of the treatment. In this situation, the jaw would revert toward its original position or whatever position is most comfortable for the patient when biting since the jaw repositioning appliance has been removed. Therefore, the desire is to reposition the jaw to an optimal relation while at the same time arrange the teeth such that they fit together the best both in arch coordination between the upper and lower arches and in interdigitation between the arches. The interdigitation makes the patient more likely to keep the lower jaw in the new position since the teeth fit together the best in the interdigitated position.
Repositioning a jaw (e.g., separation of occlusal surfaces and/or moving forward or backward the position of a lower jaw) according to embodiments of the present disclosure can include utilizing a set of one or more appliances, such as positioners, retainers, and/or other removable appliances (e.g., clear shells and/or aligners) having a shell to be worn over the teeth of a patient and having a first repositioning jaw element thereon that is positioned to interface, interact, and/or engage a second repositioning jaw element on an appliance on an opposing jaw for separating occlusal surfaces of the patient's upper dentition and lower dentition and/or to reposition the patient's jaw. The repositioning jaw elements can place a force on the lower jaw of the patient to sagittally move the lower jaw. Sagittal movement of a jaw, as used herein, can include revising a position of a lower jaw relative to the upper jaw (e.g., in a forward or backward direction). For instance, the position of the patient's lower jaw can shift sagittally to stimulate jaw growth in patients with growth potential remaining and/or to allow muscles to re-learn a new position.
In various embodiments, the movement can be controlled to reposition the patient's jaw in an anterior-posterior plane with respect to the jaws of the patient. For example, the first repositioning jaw element and the second repositioning jaw element can be positioned to interface as the patient moves to a fully engaged sagittal jaw position of the patient's upper dentition and the patient's lower dentition and wherein this movement is designed to reposition the patient's jaw in an anteroposterior plane with respect to the jaws of the patient.
For example, one or more embodiments can include providing a virtual model of a dental appliance having a shell configured to reposition a number of teeth of a patient. The virtual model of the dental appliance can, for instance, be created from a virtual model of the jaw of the patient and/or from a physical mold of the jaw of the patient. A virtual repositioning jaw element can, for example, be positioned on the shell of the virtual model of the dental appliance parallel to a bite plane of the patient and/or can extend from a surface of the shell of the virtual model of the dental appliance. The positioning of the virtual repositioning jaw element and/or the design of the virtual repositioning jaw element can be based on and/or included in a treatment plan. For instance, the treatment plan can include a desired and/or final jaw position. The virtual model of the dental appliance with the revised position of the repositioning jaw element can be used to create a physical dental appliance, for instance, as discussed further herein.
A dental appliance, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure, can include a first shell having a number of tooth apertures configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of a patient's upper dentition and a second shell having a number of tooth apertures configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition. Each shell (e.g., the first shell and second shell) can have a repositioning jaw element extending from a surface of the shells. The repositioning jaw elements can be positioned in each respective shell to interact and/or interface at surfaces in the presence of a fully engaged sagittal jaw position of the patient's upper jaw and the patient's lower jaw in order to reposition the patient's jaw and/or separate occlusal surfaces of the patient's teeth for treatment purposes. A fully engaged sagittal jaw position, as used herein, can include a relationship of the mandible and the maxilla when the upper and lower jaw are closed as far as the dental appliance with the repositioning jaw elements will allow (e.g., a partial occlusal jaw position).
For example, the separation of occlusal surfaces of the patient's teeth can be used to treat sagittal malocclusions (including crossbites), deep bites, open bites, and/or other malocclusions, in various embodiments. The repositioning jaw elements can be positioned such that the repositioning jaw elements avoid interference with the shells of the dental appliance that are used to align the teeth. For instance, the separation of occlusal surfaces can include the occlusal surfaces of at least some of the teeth within and/or a portion of occlusal surfaces of the shells interacting with one or more surfaces of the repositioning jaw elements of a shell on an opposing jaw. In this manner, a dental appliance in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure can be used to concurrently treat sagittal malocclusions, including crossbite and/or deep bite, while simultaneously repositioning a number of teeth of the patient. Further, in some embodiments, all of this tooth and jaw movement can be planned via computing device executable instructions and therefore, excessive or redundant movements between the two typically separate processes can be avoided. Additionally, a virtual model can be created and tested so that the patient does not have to be subjected to trial and error to achieve proper jaw and teeth positioning. The ability to visualize the repositioned jaws and establish the alignment in the repositioned configuration is advantageous because the best alignment of the teeth when the jaw is repositioned can be precisely established and can be different from the alignment when the jaws are not repositioned into an improved or optimal position.
In some embodiments, a plurality of appliances can be worn by a patient successively to achieve gradual simultaneous and/or sequential repositioning of the patient's jaw and/or gradual tooth movement. For instance, each of a plurality of dental appliance can reposition the patient's jaw in incremental distances. In such embodiments, the positions of the repositioning jaw elements can be adjusted to allow the treatment professional to fine tune the movement of the jaw symmetrically or asymmetrically and/or to move the teeth incrementally which may be less painful than with fixed appliances which may impart more sudden force in the initial period of the process than later in the process, among other benefits.
In the detailed description of the present disclosure, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration how one or more embodiments of the disclosure may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those of ordinary skill in the art to practice the embodiments of this disclosure, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that process, electrical, and/or structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. As used herein, the designator “N” and “P”, particularly with respect to reference numerals in the drawings, indicates that a number of the particular feature so designated can be included. As used herein, “a number of” a particular thing can refer to one or more of such things (e.g., a number of teeth can refer to one or more teeth).
The figures herein follow a numbering convention in which the first digit or digits correspond to the drawing figure number and the remaining digits identify an element or component in the drawing. Similar elements or components between different figures may be identified by the use of similar digits. For example, 106 may reference element “06” in
In some instances, the patient may exhibit abnormal occlusion or malocclusion. For instance, this may include a jaw (or both) that is protrusive, retrusive, or laterally displaced. As an example, positioning of the number of teeth of the patient's upper dentition and the number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition can be such that the best fit of the upper dentition with the lower dentition results in a misalignment of the lower jaw 104 relative to the upper jaw 102 either in positional relations or at the level of the jaw joint which connects the lower jaw 104 to the upper jaw 102. The lower jaw 104 can be in a retruded position, for instance, resulting in a distance (e.g., space) between the front teeth of the upper dentition and the front teeth of the lower dentition (e.g., an increased overjet). Correction of the malocclusion can be beneficial to the patient in terms of improved chewing ability, reduced premature wear of the teeth, and/or improved facial aesthetics.
In some embodiments, the upper jaw 102 and lower jaw 104 illustrated in
Repositioning jaw elements can be positioned on occlusal, buccal, and/or lingual surfaces of a dental appliance to be placed over the patient's teeth. A repositioning jaw element, as used herein, can include a portion of material (e.g., a geometric shaped element, such as a block shape) extending from a surface of the shell of the appliance, as discussed further herein. For instance, a virtual repositioning jaw element can be positioned on the shell of the virtual model of the dental appliance parallel to a bite plane of the patient. A bite plane, as used herein, can include a surface from the incisal edges of the incisors and the tips of the occluding surfaces of the posterior teeth that is a mean of the curvature of the surface.
In some embodiments, the position of the virtual repositioning jaw element can be revised to align with a midline (e.g., middle) of at least one tooth of the number of teeth wherein the virtual repositioning jaw element extends from a surface of the shell of the virtual model of the dental appliance. However, embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure are not so limited and the virtual repositioning jaw elements may not be aligned with a midline of the at least one tooth in various embodiments. The virtual model of the dental appliance, including the virtual repositioning jaw element, can be used to determine a treatment plan for the patient and/or to form a physical dental appliance and/or physical repositioning jaw element (e.g., as discussed further herein).
The physical repositioning jaw element can be formed of a variety of material types. In some embodiments, the physical repositioning jaw element can be formed of the same material as the shell of the dental appliance (e.g., a polymeric material). For instance, the physical repositioning jaw element can be formed integrally with the shell and/or formed of a same material as the shell.
The repositioning jaw elements can also be positioned in different places, in some embodiments. For example, the first repositioning jaw element 106 and the second repositioning jaw element 108 can be positioned near occlusal surfaces of the teeth of the patient to advance the placement of the lower jaw 104 in an forward direction (e.g., in an anterior direction and/or toward a patient's lips) or in a backward direction (e.g., in an posterior direction and/or towards the back of the patient's head). For instance, occlusal surfaces of teeth of the upper jaw 102 and lower jaw 104 can be separated using the first repositioning jaw element 106 and the second repositioning jaw element 108 to move (e.g., to move sagittally) the lower jaw 104 of the patient from an articulation path during opening (e.g., the path that the jaw currently follows when opening) to a desired range of jaw opening extending from an advanced or forward position of occlusion, as described further herein. As an example, the first repositioning jaw element 106 can include a first surface 128 and the second repositioning jaw element 108 can include a second surface 130 to interface, interact, and/or otherwise engage with the first surface 128 of the first repositioning jaw element 106, as discussed further herein. By moving the lower jaw 104, muscles associated with movement of the lower jaw 104 can be retrained to a new position (generally in a forward and/or downward direction, or in a backward direction) or the lower jaw may be permitted to grow more fully if the patient has not fully developed skeletally.
The first repositioning jaw element 106 can be positioned near the occlusal surfaces of the posterior teeth (in the embodiment illustrated by
The first repositioning jaw element 106 and the second repositioning jaw element 108 can include surfaces that can interface, interact, and/or engage with a surface of a repositioning jaw element on a shell of an opposing jaw. For instance, a first surface of the first repositioning jaw element 106 can interface, interact, and/or engage with a second surface of the second repositioning jaw element 108. A surface, as used herein, can include a side and/or end surface of a repositioning jaw element. In some embodiments, the first surface can include a slanted surface on a mesial-facing surface of the first repositioning jaw element 106 and/or the second surface can include a slanted surface on a distal-facing surface of the second repositioning jaw element 108, for instance. For example, a mesial-facing surface can include a surface of a repositioning jaw element that is in a direction toward the anterior midline of the teeth. A distal-facing surface can include a surface of a repositioning jaw element that is in a direction toward the last tooth in each quadrant of a dental arch. However, embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure are not so limited. A mesial-facing surface, in some embodiments, can be facing toward the facial plane (e.g., normal to the facial plane), whereas a distal-facing surface can be facing away from the facial plane (e.g., normal to the facial plane but in the opposite direction). The surfaces of the repositioning jaw elements, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, can be oriented in a variety of directions.
The third repositioning jaw element 110 can be positioned near the occlusal surfaces of the posterior teeth (in embodiment illustrated by
However, embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure are not so limited. For instance, the surfaces of the repositioning jaw elements 106, 108, 110, 112 can be oriented in a variety of directions. For instance, the first surface of the first repositioning jaw element 106 and the third surface of the third repositioning jaw element 110 can include distal-facing slanted surfaces and/or the second surface of the second repositioning jaw element 108 and the fourth surface of the fourth repositioning jaw element 112 can include mesial-facing slanted surfaces, among other orientations.
The surfaces (e.g., that interact and/or interface) of the repositioning jaw elements 106, 108, 110, 112 can be angled, in various embodiments, to guide the lower jaw 104 into position and gain desired lateral or prevent unwanted lateral movement. The surfaces can be angled in buccal-lingual and/or mesial-distal direction, for example. The angle of interacting and/or interfacing surfaces (e.g., two surfaces that are designed to interface, interact, and/or engage with each other either actively or passively) can have the same degree and/or slant or a different degree and/or slant (e.g., as illustrated by the embodiment of
For example, the first surface of the first repositioning jaw element 106 and the second surface of the second repositioning jaw element 108 can interface at a first slant. The slant can include, for instance, a degree of angle of the repositioning jaw elements. The third surface of the third repositioning jaw element 110 and the fourth surface of the fourth repositioning jaw element 112 can interface at a second slant.
The first slant and the second slant, in accordance with a number of embodiments, can include opposing angles. The opposing angles of slants on opposing posterior sides of the patient's dentition can facilitate desired lateral movement or limit and/or prevent unwanted lateral movement. In some embodiments, the sum of the opposing angles can include 180 degrees. As an example, if the first slant is 70 degrees then the second slant can include 110 degrees.
In accordance with some embodiments, the repositioning jaw elements 106, 108, 110, 112 extending from surfaces of a shell can be used to generate distalizing force on at least some of the teeth that are located within the shell. For example, when the repositioning jaw elements 106, 108, 110, 112 interface, the distalizing forces can be isolated to posterior teeth of the upper jaw. The distalizing forces can, in some embodiments, cause tooth movement of the upper jaw posterior teeth in a distal direction. As such, the repositioning jaw elements 106, 108, 110, 112 in various embodiments can be a substitute for Class II elastics.
In some embodiments, the repositioning jaw elements 106, 108, 110, 112 can include geometric features to engage with a repositioning jaw element on an opposing jaw. Geometric features, as used herein, can include a variety of protruding geometric shapes (e.g., cylinder, rectangular, etc.) and/or receding geometric shapes (e.g., negative space that matches the protruding geometric shape on a repositioning jaw element on an opposing jaw, as illustrated in the embodiment of
In some embodiments, the geometric features of a first repositioning jaw element and/or a second repositioning jaw element can include a protrusion and a socket. A socket, in various embodiments, can include a convex geometric shape that is shaped to mate with a geometric shape on an opposing jaw (e.g., as discussed further herein). For example, a first repositioning jaw element can include a protrusion extending from the first repositioning jaw element in a direction toward occlusal surfaces of the opposing jaw. The second repositioning jaw element can include a socket within the second repositioning jaw element. The protrusion of the first repositioning jaw element can fit into the socket of the second repositioning jaw element to assist in guiding the lower jaw into a forward position or a backward position.
Alternatively, the protrusion and/or socket can be located within and/or extend from a surface of the shell. In some instances, one or more sockets can be located within and/or extend from a surface of the first shell located behind anterior teeth of the upper jaw. In such an embodiment, the lower incisor teeth can fit into the one or more sockets to guide the lower jaw into a forward position or backward position.
Although the present embodiments discuss guiding a jaw into a forward position or backward position, embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure are not so limited. For example, embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure can include guiding a jaw in a variety of directions, such as a mesial-distal direction, as discussed further herein with regards to the embodiment illustrated in
Appliances can include any positioners, retainers, and/or other removable dental appliances for finishing, inducing (e.g., causing small movements in teeth), or maintaining teeth position in connection with a dental treatment. These appliances may be utilized by the treatment professional in completing a treatment plan. For example, a treatment plan can include the use of a set of dental appliances, created according to models described herein.
An appliance can, for example, be fabricated from a polymeric shell, and/or formed from other material, having a number of cavities shaped (e.g. tooth apertures) to receive and apply force to reposition one or more teeth from one geometric tooth arrangement to one or more successive tooth arrangements. There may be several appliances that may be needed to move the teeth from the beginning of a dental treatment plan to the end of the plan. The shell may be designed to fit over a number of, or in many instances all, teeth present in the upper and/or lower jaw. For example, a shell can have a cavity that includes a number of tooth apertures for placement of teeth therein. Each tooth aperture can include an interior surface (e.g., directly adjacent to the surfaces of the teeth placed therein) and an exterior surface. The interior surface is configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of the patient, for example.
The first shell 114 can include a number of tooth apertures configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of a patient's upper dentition. As illustrated by
The second shell 116 can include a number of tooth apertures configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition. A second repositioning jaw element 108 can extend from a surface of the second shell 116. For instance, the second repositioning jaw element 108 can extend from an occlusal surface of the second shell 116.
The first repositioning jaw element 106 can include a first surface 128 and the second repositioning jaw element 108 can include a second surface 130 to interface with the first surface 128 of the first repositioning jaw element 106. For example, as illustrated by the embodiment of
Alternatively and/or in addition, the repositioning of the patient's jaw can include a separation of occlusal surfaces of the number of teeth of the patient's upper dentition from occlusal surfaces of the number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition as the patient moves to a fully engaged sagittal jaw position. For instance, separating occlusal surfaces can include separating occlusal surfaces to a threshold distance to prevent an occlusal surface of the first shell 114 from contacting or engaging an occlusal surface of the second shell 116. The threshold distance can include a particular value. For example, the threshold distance can include one millimeter or less, among other values. As discussed above, the separation of occlusal surfaces can include the occlusal surfaces of at least some of the teeth within a shell and/or at least some of an occlusal surface of the shell contacting or engaging with one or more surfaces of the repositioning jaw element of a shell on an opposing jaw.
In some embodiments, the separation of occlusal surfaces can be used for treatment of sagittal malocclusion, including excess overjets and anterior crossbite, the correction of transverse malocclusions including lateral crossbites, and/or vertical problems such as deep bite. Malocclusions can be treated using the repositioning jaw elements 106, 108 (in addition to a third repositioning jaw element 110 and fourth repositioning jaw element 112 on the opposing posterior side of the jaw, in some embodiments, as illustrated by the embodiment of
Patients with crossbites and/or deep bites can have anterior incisors in the upper jaw and/or the lower jaw that are difficult to move into the desired location because teeth in the opposing jaw are a physical obstruction and therefore can prevent the desired movement from taking place, in some instances. The repositioning jaw elements 106, 108 can provide separation of the upper jaw from the lower jaw (e.g., disclusion) by separating an occlusal surface of the first shell 114 from an occlusal surface of the second shell 116. In various instances, the repositioning jaw elements 106, 108 used for the treatment of crossbites and deep bites can be the same buccal-lingual length and can extend from an occlusal, lingual, and/or buccal surface of the first shell 114 and the second shell 116.
The repositioning jaw element 106, 108 can be positioned near posterior teeth, for instance, to allow for an anterior portion of the bite of the patient to open enough (e.g., disengage the occlusal interferences that may normally take place) to allow for easier treatment of the crossbite and/or deep bite. For instance, the separation of occlusal surfaces can be caused by preventing the cusp of the molars from sliding back into the fossae on the opposing molars. In such situations, the upper jaw and the lower jaw are held apart and avoid interfering with the prescribed treatment, for example.
In accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure, an opening of 5-6 millimeter (mm) at the first premolar region can be desirable for treatment of deep bite, open bite, and/or other malocclusions. For example, an aim of repositioning jaw elements to treat a patient with Class II, Division 1 deep bite can be to cause a 2 mm inter-incisal clearance (e.g., space between the incisal teeth of the upper jaw and incisal teeth of the lower jaw) resulting in a 5-6 mm opening at the first premolar region (e.g., teeth). By contrast, an aim of repositioning jaw elements to treat a patient with Class II, Division II deep bite can be to cause 0 mm of inter-incisal clearance (e.g., portions of the dental appliance with incisal teeth therein contact) resulting in a 5-6 mm opening at the first premolar region. Further, an aim of repositioning jaw elements to treat a patient with Class II, open bite can be to increase the inter-incisal clearance, as compared to repositioning jaw elements for Class II, Division 1 deep bite, resulting in a 5-6 mm opening at the premolar region. For example, in a 2 mm anterior open bite patient, a 4 mm inter-incisal clearance can be optimal. In various embodiments, the repositioning jaw element 106, 108 can inherently cause disclusion of posterior teeth of the patient.
The repositioning jaw elements 106, 108 interfacing, interacting, and/or engaging can be used to reposition a patient's lower jaw (e.g., lower jaw 112 illustrated in the embodiment of
In some embodiments, repositioning jaw elements, such as the first repositioning jaw element 106 and second repositioning jaw element 108, can include occlusal surfaces of the repositioning jaw elements that substantially follow the contours of the occlusal surfaces of teeth on an opposing jaw of the patient (e.g., as illustrated in the embodiment of
Alternatively and/or in addition, in some embodiments, occlusal surfaces of the repositioning jaw elements and/or other occlusal surfaces of the removable dental appliance can have a geometry that differs from the contours of the occlusal surfaces of teeth that are of an opposing jaw of the patient (e.g., as illustrated in the embodiment of
In accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure, a removable dental appliance can include the first shell 114 and second shell 116. The removable dental appliance can be configured to reposition a number of teeth of the patient's upper dentition and a number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition concurrently with repositioning of the patient's jaw. The simultaneous treatment of misalignment of a patient's jaw (e.g., Class II correction) in conjunction with teeth alignment issues (e.g., rotation, tipping, etc.) can shorten treatments times compared to sequential treatment protocols that first treat the misalignment of a patient's jaw before treating the misalignment of the patient's teeth. To help accomplish this objective, the repositioning jaw elements 106, 108, in accordance with a number of embodiments, avoid and/or do not interfere with the engagement of the shell with the teeth contained therein.
The simultaneous treatment of misalignment of a patient's jaw concurrently with teeth misalignment can assist in the treatment of repositioning the patient's jaw. If untreated, teeth misalignment may encourage occlusion in the original jaw position instead of the desired jaw position (e.g., the intended or final jaw position), since the optimal interdigitation between the arches coincides with the original jaw position. Realignment of the teeth so that the teeth fit together best in the desired jaw position can reinforce the desired jaw position when the appliances are removed. Repositioning of the patient's jaw can include retraining the muscles associated with the movement of the lower jaw. Due to the misalignment of a patient's teeth, a lower jaw of the patient can be incorrectly positioned in a retruded position because the teeth position with the best fit may force the jaw into a more retruded position than physiologically comfortable. A treatment whereby the teeth fit better in an anteriorly positioned mandible can relieve the joint compression that may take place when the mandible is retruded. The jaw muscles of the patient can be retrained to hold the lower jaw in a more forward (and more comfortable) position.
In contrast, the removable dental appliance embodiments discussed herein can comprise a first shell 114, a second shell 116, a first repositioning jaw element 106 extending from a surface of the first shell 114, and a second repositioning jaw element 108 extending from a surface of the second shell 116 and can concurrently treat misalignment of the patient's jaw and misalignment of the patient's teeth. Concurrent treatment can avoid and/or prevent reversion and/or retraining of the muscles in an incorrect position, among other benefits. Further, removable dental appliance embodiments, in accordance with the present disclosure, can result in fewer braces and/or elastics as compared to prior solutions. In growing patients, the concurrent treatment may also encourage growth of the jaw(s) in a more favorable direction.
Although the present embodiment of
In some embodiments, the repositioning jaw elements (e.g., first repositioning jaw element 106 and second repositioning jaw element 108 illustrated in
In some embodiments, the hollow space within the repositioning jaw element can be used as a reservoir for the disbursement of medications or other items within the patient's mouth. For example, breath freshening agents, medications to aid in moving of teeth and/or improvement of the condition of the teeth and/or gums of the patient may be provided therein and dispensed through holes and/or passages formed in the interior and/or exterior sides of the repositioning jaw element.
A hollow repositioning jaw element can increase the flexibility of the shell to which the repositioning jaw element is attached. The increased flexibility introduced can lower the functionality and/or the retention of the dental appliance in a vertical or horizontal direction. For example, as a patient moves to a fully engaged sagittal jaw position and the repositioning jaw elements interface, the force placed on the shell can result in a gingival line of the shell flaring (e.g., moving away) from the gum line of the patient. In a number of embodiments, a number of design features and/or elements can be used to reduce and/or eliminate the increase in flexibility, such as grooves and curved repositioning jaw elements (e.g., as discussed further herein in regards to the embodiment of
In some embodiments, the repositioning jaw elements can be shaped to minimize and/or prevent degrading the retention and/or functionality of the shell of the dental appliance. For example, the buccal-lingual width of a repositioning jaw element can be different on an occlusal surface of the repositioning jaw element (e.g., top surface) than on a buccal-lingual width of a surface of the repositioning jaw element adjacent to the shell (e.g., bottom surface). For instance, the buccal-lingual width of a repositioning jaw element can be wider on an occlusal surface of the repositioning jaw element than on a buccal-lingual width of a surface of the repositioning jaw element adjacent to the shell. Such a shape can be similar to the construction of an I-beam, as illustrated in the embodiment of
In accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure, the repositioning jaw elements can be positioned on the removable dental appliance near unerupted and/or removed 2nd and/or 3rd molar teeth. Repositioning jaw elements positioned on the removable dental appliance near the unerupted and/or removed 2nd and/or 3rd molar teeth can, for instance, provide increased area for tooth movements. Alternatively and/or in addition, a spring feature can be positioned on the removable dental appliance near unerupted and/or removed 2nd and/or 3rd molar teeth. For example, a spring feature can be positioned on a first removable dental appliance and a tab feature can be positioned on a second removable dental appliance to interface with the spring feature. The spring feature can guide the lower jaw of the patient to a position (e.g., a forward or backward position), for example (e.g., as illustrated in the embodiment of
In a number of examples, a variety of features can be used in addition to and/or in place of repositioning jaw elements to guide the lower jaw to a position (e.g., a forward or backward position). Example features can include connecting the first shell and the second shell using material at posterior sides of the shells, a rigid structure, and/or ridges, among other features (e.g., as illustrated in the embodiments of
Although not illustrated in
The second repositioning jaw element 208 can be positioned near a buccal surface of the posterior teeth (e.g., bicuspids) of the lower jaw 204 of the patient to move the position of the lower jaw 204 in a forward direction or backward direction. Although not illustrated in
The first repositioning jaw element 206 and the second repositioning jaw element 208 can interface. For instance, a first surface 228 of the first repositioning jaw element 206 can interface with a second surface 230 of the second repositioning jaw element 208. The first repositioning jaw element 206 and the second repositioning jaw element 208 can be positioned to interface in a presence of a temporary bite (e.g., a fully engaged sagittal jaw position of the patient's upper dentition and the patient's lower dentition) in a manner to reposition the patient's jaw. A fully engaged sagittal jaw position, as previously discussed, can include a relationship of the mandible and the maxilla when the upper and lower jaw are closed as far as the dental appliance with the repositioning jaw elements will allow (e.g., a partial occlusal jaw position).
For example, the first surface 228 of the first repositioning jaw element 206 interfacing with the second surface 230 of the second repositioning jaw element 208 can place a force on the patient's jaw to reposition the patient's jaw. The force can, for instance, sagittally move the patient's lower jaw 204.
In various embodiments, at least one of the repositioning jaw elements 206, 208 can extend past an occlusal plane of the upper jaw 202 and/or lower jaw 204 of the patient. For example, the first repositioning jaw element 206 can extend past the occlusal plane of the upper jaw 202 to interface with the second repositioning jaw element 208. The second repositioning jaw element 208 may not extend past the occlusal plane of the lower jaw 204, for instance. Alternatively, the second repositioning jaw element 208 can extend past the occlusal plane of the lower jaw 204 to interface with the first repositioning jaw element 206 and the first repositioning jaw element 206 may not extend past the occlusal plane of the upper jaw 202. Further, in some embodiments, both the first repositioning jaw element 206 and the second repositioning jaw element 208 can extend past the occlusal plane of the upper jaw 202 and the lower jaw 204, respectively, to interface with one another.
For example, the first repositioning jaw element 206 can be positioned near the buccal surfaces of posterior teeth (e.g., molars and/or bicuspids) of the upper jaw 202 and the second repositioning jaw element 208 can be positioned near the buccal surfaces of posterior teeth (e.g., bicuspids) of the lower jaw 204. The first repositioning jaw element 206 and the second repositioning jaw element 208 can be located near a first posterior side of the patient's dentition (e.g., positioned on a first posterior side of a first shell and a second shell).
The first repositioning jaw element 206 and the second repositioning jaw element 208 can include surfaces designed to interact, interface, and/or otherwise engage with one another. For instance, a first surface of the first repositioning jaw element 206 can interface with a second surface of a second repositioning jaw element 208. The first surface can include a slanted surface on a mesial-facing surface of the first repositioning jaw element 206 and the second surface can include a slanted surface on a distal-facing surface of the first repositioning jaw element 208, for example.
The third repositioning jaw element 210 can be positioned near the buccal surfaces of posterior teeth (e.g., molars and/or bicuspids) of the upper jaw 202 and the fourth repositioning jaw element 212 can be positioned near the buccal surfaces of posterior teeth (e.g., bicuspids) of the lower jaw 204. The third repositioning jaw element 210 and the fourth repositioning jaw element 212 can be located near a second posterior side of the patient's dentition (e.g., positioned on a second posterior side of a shell of a first shell and a second shell).
The third repositioning jaw element 210 and the fourth repositioning jaw element 212 can include surfaces designed to interact, interface, and/or otherwise engage with one another. For instance, a third surface of the third repositioning jaw element 210 can interface with a fourth surface of the fourth repositioning jaw element 212. The third surface can include a slanted surface on a mesial-facing surface of the third repositioning jaw element 210 and the fourth surface can include a slanted surface on a distal-facing surface of the fourth repositioning jaw element 212, for example.
The surfaces of the repositioning jaw elements 206, 208, 210, 212 can be angled, in various embodiments, to guide the lower jaw 204 into the intended and/or final jaw position and/or prevent unwanted lateral movement. The surfaces can be angled in buccal-lingual and/or mesial-distal direction. The angle of the surfaces (e.g., two surfaces that are designed to interface) can be comprised of supplemental angles (e.g., have the same slants at the interface).
For example, the first surface of the first repositioning jaw element 206 and the second surface of the second repositioning jaw element 208 can interface at a first slant. The third surface of the third repositioning jaw element 210 and the fourth surface of the fourth repositioning jaw element 212 can interface at a second slant.
Although not illustrated by the embodiments of
In some embodiments, repositioning jaw elements can extend from a lingual surface of the shells. A lingual surface of a shell can include an exterior surface of the shell near the lingual surface of the teeth therein. For example, in some embodiments, the first repositioning jaw element 206 and third repositioning jaw element 210 can each extend from a lingual surface of the first shell and the second repositioning jaw element 208 and fourth repositioning jaw element 212 can each extend from a lingual surface of the second shell. Positioning the repositioning jaw elements on the lingual surface of the shell can, for instance, result in a dental appliance that is more aesthetically pleasing to the patient because the repositioning jaw elements are less visible to others (e.g., decreasing the prominence of the repositioning jaw elements).
Alternatively and/or in addition, a number of repositioning jaw elements can extend from a lingual surface of the shells and a number of repositioning jaw elements can extend from a buccal surface of the shell (e.g., as illustrated by
In some embodiments, a plurality of repositioning jaw elements can extend from the buccal surface of the first shell and a plurality of repositioning jaw elements can extend from the buccal surface of the second shell. The plurality of repositioning jaw elements extending from buccal surfaces can, for instance, decrease the prominence of the repositioning jaw elements as compared to a single repositioning jaw element extending from each buccal surface.
In accordance with a number of embodiments, a repositioning jaw element extending from a buccal surface can be used to treat crossbite in a patient. For instance, a repositioning jaw element extending from a buccal surface of a first shell and a repositioning jaw element extending from a buccal surface of a second sell can interface to tip a molar tooth in a buccal direction to treat crossbite in a patient.
At block 322, the method 320 includes moving at least one tooth with a dental appliance having a first shell configured to receive a number of teeth of a patient's upper dentition, the number of teeth comprising the at least one tooth. That is, the first shell can include a shell configured to receive a number of teeth of the patient's upper dentition and reposition at least one tooth of the number of teeth of the patient's upper dentition.
At block 324, the method 320 includes separating a patient's upper dentition from the patient's lower dentition utilizing the dental appliance. For instance, the separation can include separating the occlusal surfaces to a threshold distance to prevent an occlusal surface of the first shell from contacting an occlusal surface of a second shell. The second shell can include a shell configured to receive a number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition and reposition at least one tooth of the number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition.
The dental appliance, at block 326, can interface a first surface of a first repositioning jaw element of the first shell with a second surface of a second repositioning jaw element of a second shell of the dental appliance. The second shell can, for instance, be configured to receive a number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition. The dental appliance can separate occlusal surfaces of the number of teeth of the patient's upper dentition from the occlusal surfaces of the number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition as the patient moves to a fully engaged sagittal jaw position, for example. The surface area of the repositioning jaw elements that engage the upper jaw/shell to the lower jaw/shell while the disengaged areas are separated may be built so that the engagement is a better fit than the existing occlusion (e.g., greater points or surfaces in contact) so that the preferred position of the patient is the engaged surface area instead of the current occlusion.
A sagittal jaw position can include a relationship of the mandible and the maxilla when the upper jaw and the lower jaw are closed and the teeth are in contact. A fully engaged sagittal jaw position, as used herein, can include a relationship of the mandible and the maxilla when the upper and lower jaw are closed as far as the dental appliance with the repositioning jaw elements will allow (e.g., as the first surface of a first repositioning jaw element interfaces, interacts, and/or engages the second surface of the second repositioning jaw element). That is, in a fully engaged sagittal jaw position, at least some of the teeth of the upper jaw and at least some of the teeth of the lower jaw are not in contact. Further, in some embodiments, at least some of the occlusal surface of the first shell and the occlusal surface of the second shell are not in contact in a fully engaged sagittal jaw position.
As previously discussed, the fully engaged sagittal jaw position may be needed in the treatment of malocclusion such as excess or insufficient overjet, excess or insufficient overbite, and/or crossbite. For instance, separating the occlusal surfaces can allow for moving a lower jaw of the patient or opening up the bite to a desired range of jaw opening extending from the current position of occlusion. It can also allow for decompression of a lower jaw forward from an undesirable backwards position into a more comfortable (and esthetically pleasing) anteriorly displaced position. The advancement can be unilateral or bilateral.
In a number of embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure, the occlusal surfaces can be separated to a threshold distance to prevent an occlusal surface of the first shell from contacting an occlusal surface of the second shell. An example threshold distance can be one millimeter, however, a treatment professional may determine another suitable distance and such distances are within the scope of the embodiments of the present disclosure.
In various embodiments, the method 320 can include separating the occlusal surfaces of the number of teeth the patient's upper dentition from the occlusal surfaces of the number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition as the patient moves to the fully engaged sagittal jaw position in a plurality of incremental distances utilizing a plurality of dental appliances. For example, the repositioning jaw elements can be designed to incrementally treat a malocclusion, such as excessive or inadequate overjet, excessive or inadequate overbite, and/or crossbite by using repositioning jaw elements provided on a plurality of dental appliances. In some embodiments, the increment can include a gradual movement (e.g., sagittal movement) of the lower jaw by shifting the position of the repositioning jaw elements and/or shifting the length of one or more repositioning jaw elements on each of a series of the plurality of dental appliances (e.g., as discussed further herein with regard to
As illustrated by
In a number of embodiments, a repositioning jaw element can include a curved back surface. For instance, a back surface (a surface on the opposite side relative to the surface that is designed to interface, interact, and/or engage a repositioning jaw element on an opposing jaw) of a repositioning jaw element can be curved in a distal direction. As illustrated by
As illustrated by
Alternatively and/or in addition, in a variety of embodiments, a repositioning jaw element 434 can include a side groove on a buccal side surface and/or a lingual side surface (e.g., side surface 458) of a repositioning jaw element 434. A buccal side surface of a repositioning jaw element, as used herein, can include a side of the repositioning jaw element extending toward and/or adjacent to the cheek of the patient. A lingual side surface of the repositioning jaw element, as used herein, can include a side of the repositioning jaw element extending toward and/or adjacent to the tongue of the user. Grooves (e.g., a top groove and/or number of side grooves) can, for example, increase a rigidity of the repositioning jaw element 434 as compared to a repositioning jaw element without grooves and/or can minimize and/or prevent degrading the retention and/or functionality of the shell of the dental appliance. A groove can also function on the shell of each jaw during treatment.
In various instances, a plurality of side grooves 442-1, 442-2, 442-3, 442-4, 442-5, 442-6 . . . 442-N) can be placed on the buccal side surface and/or the lingual side surface (e.g., side surface 458) of the repositioning jaw element 434. For example, the side grooves 442-1 . . . 442-N can be placed on each of the buccal side surface and lingual side surface (e.g., side surface 458) of a virtual repositioning jaw element and/or a physical repositioning jaw element. The side grooves 442-1 . . . 442-N can each include a hollow channel within the side surface of the repositioning jaw element 434. The side grooves 442-1 . . . 442-N can extend in vertical direction (e.g., an inferior-superior direction.) As illustrated by
In some embodiments, the side grooves 442-1 . . . 442-N can include coronal-apical grooves positioned at interproximal regions of at least one of the number of teeth that the repositioning jaw element 434 extends from. That is, each side groove can be placed at an interproximal region of two teeth.
Although the present embodiment of
In accordance with some embodiments, a repositioning jaw element 444 can include curved side surfaces. For instance, a buccal side surface and/or a lingual side surface (e.g., side surface 446) can be curved in at least one of a buccal and/or lingual direction. As illustrated by
In accordance with some embodiments, side surfaces can be beveled. For instance, the buccal side surface and lingual side surface with side grooves 542-1 . . . 542-P can be beveled to include a different buccal-lingual width on a bottom than a top of the side surfaces of the repositioning jaw element. For example, the buccal-lingual width on the bottom can be wider than the buccal-lingual width on the top of the side surfaces of the repositioning jaw element. In such embodiments, the occlusal surface of the repositioning jaw element can have a narrower buccal-lingual width than a surface of the repositioning jaw element adjacent to and/or near the shell of the dental appliance (e.g., bottom surface of the repositioning jaw element). Beveling of the side surfaces can, for instance, include beveling the surface 536 and/or the back surface 538 to have a wider buccal-lingual width on the top than the bottom of the side surfaces (e.g., as discussed further with regard to
The repositioning jaw element illustrated in
The view 553 of the repositioning jaw element can include a view of the surface that can interface, interact, and/or engage with another surface (e.g., the surface 536 of
As illustrated by
Further, as illustrated by the arrow 556, the surface that can interface, interact, and/or engage with another surface can be slanted. For instance, the surface can be slanted at an angle in a mesial-distal direction.
As illustrated by
The processor 666 can execute instructions 672 that are stored on an internal or external non-transitory computer device readable medium (CRM). A non-transitory CRM, as used herein, can include volatile and/or non-volatile memory. Volatile memory can include memory that depends upon power to store information, such as various types of dynamic random access memory (DRAM), among others. Non-volatile memory can include memory that does not depend upon power to store information.
Memory 668 and/or the processor 666 may be located on the computing device 664 or off the computing device 664, in some embodiments. As such, as illustrated in the embodiment of
As illustrated in the embodiment of
For example, in the embodiment illustrated in
In some embodiments, the scanning device 680 can be configured to scan one or more physical dental molds of a patient's dentition. In one or more embodiments, the scanning device 680 can be configured to scan the patient's dentition and/or dental appliance directly. The scanning device 680 can be configured to input data into the computing device 664.
In some embodiments, the camera dock 682 can receive an input from an imaging device (e.g., a 2D or 3D imaging device) such as a digital camera, a printed photograph scanner, and/or other suitable imaging device. The input from the imaging device can, for example, be stored in memory 668.
The processor 666 can execute instructions to provide a visual indication of a treatment plan, a dental appliance, and/or a repositioning jaw element on the display 686. The computing device 664 can be configured to allow a treatment professional or other user to input treatment goals. Input received can be sent to the processor 666 as data 670 and/or can be stored in memory 668.
Such connectivity can allow for the input and/or output of data and/or instructions among other types of information. Some embodiments may be distributed among various computing devices within one or more networks, and such systems as illustrated in
The processor 666, in association with the data storage device (e.g., memory 668), can be associated with the data 670. The processor 666, in association with the memory 668, can store and/or utilize data 670 and/or execute instructions 672 for placing virtual repositioning jaw elements on a shell of a virtual model of a dental appliance. Such data can include the virtual dental model. The virtual model of the dental appliance with the repositioning jaw element can be used to create a physical dental appliance, for instance, as discussed further herein.
The processor 666 coupled to the memory 668 can cause the computing device 664 to perform a method including, for example, providing a virtual model of a dental appliance having a shell configured to reposition a number of teeth of a patient. In various embodiments of the present disclosure, the processor 666 coupled to the memory 668 can cause the computing device 664 to perform the method including positioning a virtual repositioning jaw element on the shell of the virtual model of the dental appliance parallel to a bite plane of the patient, wherein the repositioning jaw element extends from a surface of the shell of the virtual model of the dental appliance.
For instance, to position the virtual repositioning jaw element parallel to a bite plane can include, in some embodiments, removing a virtual image of the number teeth of the patient. With the teeth removed, a virtual representation of the bite plane of the patient can remain and the virtual repositioning jaw element can be positioned parallel to the bite plane.
Further, in some embodiments, the processor 666 coupled to the memory 668 can cause the computing device 664 to perform the method including revising the position of the virtual repositioning jaw element to align with a midline of at least one tooth of the number of teeth. For instance, in some embodiments, the virtual image of the number of teeth can be displayed (e.g., such as, after being removed) and the position of the virtual repositioning jaw element can be automatically revised to align with the midline of the at least one tooth that the virtual repositioning jaw element extends from.
In some embodiments, the processor 666 coupled to the memory 668 can cause the computing device 664 to perform the method including determining a degree of the patient's jaw alignment utilizing a virtual image of the jaw of the patient. The virtual image of the jaw of patient can include a virtual image of the mandible, its related soft and hard tissue, a number of teeth the patient's lower dentition, the maxilla, its related soft and hard tissues, and/or a number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition. The degree of the patient's jaw alignment can include, for instance, a path of articulation or jaw opening and closing. It may also include a repositioned location such as a protruded position, or a combination of semi-articulation and protrusion, for example.
A dental appliance can be made, for example, by thermal-forming a sheet of plastic over a physical dental mold. The physical dental mold, for instance, can represent an incremental position to which a patient's teeth are to be moved. The physical dental mold can be manufactured by downloading a computer-aided Design (CAD) virtual dental model to a rapid prototyping process, such as, for example, a computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) milling, stereolithography, and/or photolithography. The virtual dental mold can be hollowed out or “shelled” before sent for manufacturing to save on material cost, for example.
The dental mold (e.g., set of molded teeth) can be created from a virtual model of a number of teeth of a patient. A virtual model, for example, can include an initial virtual dental model and/or intermediate virtual dental model. A dental mold can be formed in accordance with a unique treatment file that identifies a patient, a stage of a treatment plan, the virtual model of the number of teeth, and/or whether the dental mold is of the upper and/or lower dental arch.
In some embodiments, a treatment file can be accessed by a rapid prototyping apparatus machine, such as a SLA or 3D printing, to form and/or create the dental mold. The result of the dental mold can include a set of molded teeth. The set of molded teeth can include at least a replica of the number of teeth of the patient. The dental mold can be used to make a dental appliance, for example, by creating a negative impression of the dental mold using polymeric sheets of material and vacuum forming the sheets over the dental mold, as discussed above.
For instance, a dental appliance can be formed by layering a thermoformable sheet of material and/or multiple sheets of one or more materials over the dental mold. The materials can include a polymeric material, for instance. Generally, the dental appliance is produced and/or formed by heating the polymeric thermoformable sheet and vacuum or pressure forming the sheet over the dental mold (e.g., a number of molded teeth). The shape of the sheet of material can change thickness on some portions of the sheet as it conforms to the mold shape. A dental appliance can, for example, include a negative impression of the dental mold. The appliance and/or parts thereof may be transparent, semi-transparent, or opaque in such a way as to emulate a nature tooth shade. However, embodiments in accordance with present disclosure are not so limited. For example, embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure can include forming a dental appliance utilizing a variety of techniques, such as SLA or 3D printing, among other techniques.
In a number of embodiments, the processor 666 coupled to the memory 668 can cause the computing device 664 to perform the method of providing a treatment plan. One or more appliances, including positioners, retainers, removable dental appliances, and/or other appliances for finishing and maintaining teeth positioning, can be utilized by a treatment professional in performing a treatment plan. The treatment plan can include the use of one or more dental appliances, as described herein.
For example, the processor 666 coupled to the memory 668 can cause the computing device 664 to perform the method comprising identifying a misaligned jaw of a patient from a virtual image of the patient's jaw. The identification can include, for instance, determining a degree of the patient's jaw alignment utilizing the virtual image of the patient's jaw.
In some embodiments, the processor 666 coupled to the memory 668 can cause the computing device 664 to perform the method comprising providing a treatment plan for the patient. The treatment plan can include a virtual model of a dental appliance having a first shell and a second shell configured to reposition at least one tooth of the patient. The at least one tooth can, for instance, include a tooth on a lower jaw and/or a tooth on an upper jaw of the patient. Further, the virtual model of the dental appliance can include repositioning jaw elements on the first shell and the second shell configured to move a position of the misaligned jaw of the patient (e.g., to move sagittally a position of the misaligned jaw of the patient).
The repositioning jaw elements on the first shell and the second shell can be designed based on an aim of repositioning the misaligned jaw of the patient. A particular repositioning jaw element can have a shape and angle specific to a treatment plan based on at least one of a final and/or intended jaw position, an intended use (e.g., Class I correction, Class II correction, and/or Class III correction), and/or an orientation of a tooth over which the repositioning jaw element is positioned.
According to a number of embodiments of the present disclosure, providing a treatment plan for the patient can include identifying a final jaw position of the patient. The final jaw position of the patient can include, for instance, an improved and/or optimized jaw position. For instance, the final jaw position may include simultaneous contacting of the upper and lower teeth on the right and left sides, and in the anterior and posterior occlusal areas with maximum interdigitation, a best fit or seating of the condyles of the mandible within the joint housing of the temporal bone, and/or correction of malocclusions.
The identified final jaw position can be used to design the virtual repositioning jaw elements. For instance, the virtual repositioning jaw elements can be designed to move the position of the misaligned jaw of the patient toward and/or to the final jaw position (e.g., to move sagittally).
Alternatively and/or in addition, a plurality of dental appliances (e.g., a series of dental appliances) can be used to move the position of the misaligned jaw of the patient toward and/or to the final jaw position. For example, in some embodiments, providing the treatment plan can include providing a virtual model of a plurality of dental appliances. The plurality of dental appliances can be configured to reposition the misaligned jaw in incremental distances according to a number of stages of a treatment plan (e.g., as discussed further with regard to the embodiments illustrated in
The shape and angle of each of the repositioning jaw elements can be specific to a stage of a treatment plan for which the appliance was designed (e.g., successive appliances created according to a treatment plan may have differently positioned, angled, and/or shaped repositioning jaw elements). Repositioning jaw elements that have shapes and angles specific to particular stages of treatment can be advantageous over using generic and/or uniform repositioning jaw element that are not specific to treatment stages and therefore may not accurately provide the desired correction for the treatment stage during which they are used. Such inaccurate treatment can lead to lengthening treatment plans, a need for a revised treatment plan, and/or unnecessary user discomfort, among other drawbacks. In contrast, a number of embodiments of the present disclosure allow for more timely, accurate, and/or comfortable execution of treatment plans.
In various embodiments, the processor 666 coupled to the memory 668 can cause the computing device 664 to perform the method comprising virtually testing the jaw movement to occur by the patient wearing the dental appliance. The virtual testing can include testing jaw movement, in addition to movement of teeth, in a number of embodiments. The virtual repositioning jaw elements can be adjusted based on the virtual testing of the jaw movement. For instance, the virtual repositioning jaw elements can be adjusted to reach an intended jaw position and/or a final jaw position in a treatment plan. The virtual testing and/or adjustment, in some embodiments, can be across a number of stages of a treatment plan.
For example, for each stage of a treatment plan, the instructions can be executed to model forces applied to a virtual model of the jaw by an appliance corresponding to that stage (to simulate actual forces to be applied to a user's physical jaw by a physical appliance). Those forces can include forces applied to the virtual model of the jaw by the virtual repositioning jaw elements, by virtue of the appliance being slightly out of alignment with a current configuration of the virtual model of the teeth and/or include forces applied to the aligner by the user (e.g., when the user wears the physical dental appliance).
The instructions can be executed to position the virtual repositioning jaw elements on the digital teeth of the virtual model of the jaw at a particular stage of treatment and/or adjust a position of the virtual repositioning jaw elements for subsequent stages of treatment. The virtual model of the jaw can be different at each stage of treatment according to the treatment plan (e.g., positioning of the virtual teeth and/or jaw can change). The instructions can be executed to adjust the position of the virtual repositioning jaw elements according to changes to the virtual model of the jaw between treatment stages and/or according to anticipated changes in subsequent stages of treatment (e.g., to help effectuate a desired change to the virtual model of the jaw).
Positioning and/or adjustment of positioning of virtual repositioning jaw elements on a virtual model of a jaw can be automatic (e.g., by operation of software based on force modeling for a particular stage of treatment), manual (e.g., by operation of an operator interacting with the virtual model via an interface with a computing device), or a combination thereof. Likewise, the shape, size, orientation (e.g., various angles with respect to references), and/or attachment location (on the virtual teeth) of the virtual repositioning jaw elements can be automatically set by the software, by manual operation (e.g., an operator can specify the necessary criteria of the virtual repositioning jaw elements and/or modify default criteria provided by the software), or a combination thereof.
For example, the plurality of devices can include a series of dental appliances designed to incrementally implement a treatment plan. For instance, the series of dental appliances can incrementally move a position of the patient's jaw (when the jaw is viewed in its fully closed orientation) from stage to stage. The movement of the position of the jaw can include a revised position of the lower jaw of the patient relative to the upper jaw of the patient. Each stage of the treatment plan can move the position of the patient's jaw an incremental distance (e.g., 0.1 mm) from the previous position of the patient's jaw, as discussed further herein. From one stage to the next stage, the position of the patient's jaw can progress toward a final or target jaw position.
The incremental movement of the patient's jaw can occur based on the use of repositioning jaw elements that have slightly different positions or orientations on the shells from stage to stage. For example, the positioning of repositioning jaw elements extending from a first shell and/or second shell of a dental appliance can be revised from a first stage to a second stage. The revised positioning can include changing a mesial-distal length and/or a mesial-distal placement of a repositioning jaw element from one stage (e.g., a first dental appliance) to a next stage (e.g., a second dental appliance), as discussed further herein.
As used herein, a “first stage” does not necessarily mean the original stage of a treatment plan, but is a relative term with respect to other stages. For example, the “first stage” may be a second stage of a 50 stage treatment plan, while the “second stage” may be a tenth stage of the 50 stage treatment plan, while the “third stage” may be a 30th stage of the 50 stage treatment plan, and the “fourth stage” may be a 40th stage of the 50 stage treatment plan.
The treatment plan may just treat the position of the jaw or, in some embodiments, the treatment of the position of the jaws can be combined with the movement of one or more teeth on one or both jaws. For instance, the series of dental appliances can be used to incrementally (e.g., in increments of 0.1 mm) move a position of a misaligned jaw of a patient. This can be beneficial as typical current jaw alignment techniques move a jaw in large increments, such as 0.5 mm or greater, which may cause discomfort to the patient, among other issues.
As discussed above, one or more of the series of dental appliances can also be configured to reposition a number of teeth of the patient's dentition. In some embodiments, one or more of the series of dental appliances can be configured to reposition a number of teeth of the patient's dentition simultaneously with moving a position of a jaw of the patient.
An example series of dental appliances can include a first dental appliance comprising a first shell having a first repositioning jaw element extending therefrom and a second shell having a second repositioning jaw element extending therefrom. The first dental appliance can be associated with and/or a part of an initial stage of a treatment plan (e.g., a first stage). The first dental appliance can be configured to move a misaligned jaw of the patient to a first incremental jaw position. Jaw positions can be compared when the jaw is positioned in a similar open-closed position along its path. For example, a comparison can be made when the jaw is in a fully engaged sagittal jaw position. Alternatively, a comparison could be made at other positions of the repositioning jaw elements, for example, when the repositioning jaw elements first contact each other.
The series of dental appliances can include a second dental appliance comprising a first shell having a first repositioning jaw element extending therefrom and a second shell having a second repositioning jaw element extending therefrom. The second dental appliance can be associated with and/or a part of a second stage of the treatment plan (e.g., a subsequent stage to the initial stage). The second dental appliance can be configured to move the misaligned jaw of the patient to a second incremental position.
For example, the second dental appliance can move the misaligned jaw based on the first repositioning jaw element and the second repositioning jaw element having a second position specific to a second stage of the treatment plan. In this manner, the movement induced by use of the repositioning jaw elements can be divided into increments which may allow the movement to be more precise, may allow for more complex movements, and may allow for less discomfort to the patient.
A non-engaged sagittal jaw position, as used herein, can include a position of the patient's upper jaw and lower jaw when the repositioning jaw elements of the first shell and the repositioning jaw elements of the second shell are not interfacing, interacting, and/or engaging (e.g., not touching). For instance, a non-engaged sagittal jaw position may include a position of the first shell and the second shell such that the repositioning jaw elements are not providing a force to move (e.g., sagittally) the patient's jaw.
An engaged sagittal jaw position, as used herein, can include a position of the patient's upper jaw and lower jaw when the repositioning jaw elements of the first shell and the repositioning jaw elements of the second shell are interfacing, interacting, and/or engaging. For example, an engaged sagittal jaw position may include a position of the first shell and the second shell such that the repositioning jaw elements are providing a force to move (e.g., sagittally) the patient's jaw. As discussed herein, in various embodiments, the dental appliance may move a jaw of the patient in one or more other directions in addition to sagittal movement.
Although the present embodiment illustrates two dental appliances in a series of dental appliances, embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure are not so limited. Treatment plans can include a variety of number of dental appliances, including more or less than two dental appliances.
As discussed above, each treatment stage can include a gradual movement of a lower jaw of a patient. The increments can occur based on changes in the mesial-distal length of the repositioning jaw elements and/or shifts in placement of the repositioning jaw elements on the shell (e.g. shift at least one repositioning jaw element in a mesial or distal direction).
For example, as illustrated in each embodiment of
Each first shell 714 can have a number of tooth apertures configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of a patient's upper dentition and each second shell 716 can have a number of tooth apertures configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition. A first repositioning jaw element (e.g., 706-1 of the first stage and 706-2 of the second stage of
For instance, the first repositioning jaw element 706 and the second repositioning jaw element 708 of each dental appliance can be positioned to interface in the presence of a fully engaged sagittal jaw position of the patient's upper dentition and the patient's lower dentition in a manner to reposition the patient's jaw. For instance, the repositioning can include a forward and downward movement of the patient's lower jaw (e.g., to sagittally move).
Each dental appliance in the treatment plan (e.g., at each treatment stage) can be configured to reposition the number of teeth of the patient's upper dentition and the number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition and/or reposition of the patient's jaw. For instance, the repositioning of the patient's jaw can be incremental across the number of treatment stages. An incremental reposition of the patient's jaw can include, for instance, gradual advancement of the lower jaw. As described further herein, the gradual advancement can be achieved by shifting the placement of at least one of the repositioning jaw elements from a first stage (e.g., first dental appliance) to a second stage (e.g., second dental appliance) and/or changing the mesial-distal length of at least one of the repositioning jaw elements from a first stage to a second stage of the treatment plan.
The embodiments of
The mesial-distal length of the first repositioning jaw element 706-1 and the second repositioning jaw element 708-1 can include particular lengths based on the first treatment stage. For instance, the length can be based on an incremental distance of the particular treatment stage. Based on the mesial-distal lengths of the first repositioning jaw element 706-1 and the second repositioning jaw element 708-1 of the first treatment stage, the patient's jaw can be repositioned to a first incremental position and/or distance.
In some embodiments, as illustrated by
A second treatment stage can include a first repositioning jaw element 706-2 that extends from a surface of a first shell 714-2 configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of the patient's upper dentition. A second repositioning jaw element 708-2 can extend from a surface of a second shell 716-2 configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition.
The mesial-distal length of the first repositioning jaw element 706-2 of the second treatment stage can be increased from the mesial-distal length of the first repositioning jaw element 706-1 of the first treatment stage. The increase in mesial-distal length can be based on the incremental distance of the particular treatment stage. The change can include, for example, a particular distance value x 791 (e.g., increase by particular distance value x 791) in which the mesial surface of repositioning jaw element 706-2 is extended by a distance “x” in the mesial direction. The second repositioning jaw element 708-2 of the second treatment stage can be the same mesial-distal length as the second repositioning jaw element 708-1 of the first treatment stage and/or can be increased, in various embodiments. Based on the mesial-distal lengths of the first repositioning jaw element 706-2 and the second repositioning jaw element 708-2 of the second treatment stage, the patient's jaw can be repositioned to a second incremental position and/or distance.
The mesial-distal length of the first repositioning jaw element 706-1 and the second repositioning jaw element 708-1 can include particular lengths based on the first treatment stage. The length can be based on an incremental distance of the particular treatment stage. Based on the mesial-distal lengths of the first repositioning jaw element 706-1 and the second repositioning jaw element 708-1 of the first treatment stage, the patient's jaw can be repositioned to a first incremental position and/or distance.
A second treatment stage can include a first repositioning jaw element 706-2 that extends from a surface of a first shell 714-2 configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of the patient's upper dentition. A second repositioning jaw element 708-2 can extend from a surface of a second shell 716-2 configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition.
The mesial-distal length of the second repositioning jaw element 708-2 of the second treatment stage can be increased from the mesial-distal length of the second repositioning jaw element 708-1 of the first treatment stage. The increase in mesial-distal length can be based on the incremental distance of the particular treatment stage. The change can include, for example, a particular distance value x 792 (e.g., increase by distance value x 792) in which the mesial surface of repositioning jaw element 708-2 is extended by a distance “x” in the distal direction. The first repositioning jaw element 706-2 of the second treatment stage can be the same mesial-distal length as the first repositioning jaw element 706-1 of the first treatment stage and/or can be increased, in various embodiments. Based on the mesial-distal lengths of the first repositioning jaw element 706-2 and the second repositioning jaw element 708-2 of the second treatment stage, the patient's jaw can be repositioned to a second incremental position and/or distance.
The mesial-distal placement of the first repositioning jaw element 706-1 and the second repositioning jaw element 708-1 can include a particular placement adjacent to posterior teeth therein based on the first treatment stage. For instance, the placement can be based on an incremental distance of the particular treatment stage. Based on the mesial-distal placement of the first repositioning jaw element 706-1 and the second repositioning jaw element 708-1 of the first treatment stage, the patient's jaw can be repositioned to a first incremental position and/or distance.
A second treatment stage can include a first repositioning jaw element 706-2 that extends from a surface of a first shell 714-2 configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of the patient's upper dentition. A second repositioning jaw element 708-2 can extend from a surface of a second shell 716-2 configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition.
The mesial-distal placement of the first repositioning jaw element 706-2 of the second treatment stage can be shifted in a mesial direction from the mesial-distal placement of the first repositioning jaw element 706-1 of the first treatment stage. The shift in mesial-distal placement can be based on the incremental distance of the particular treatment stage. The shift can include, for example, a particular distance value x 793 (e.g., shift in a mesial direction by a distance value of x 793). The second repositioning jaw element 708-2 of the second treatment stage can be the same mesial-distal placement as the second repositioning jaw element 708-1 of the first treatment stage and/or can be shifted, in various embodiments. Based on the mesial-distal placements of the first repositioning jaw element 706-2 and the second repositioning jaw element 708-2 of the second treatment stage, the patient's jaw can be repositioned to a second incremental position and/or distance.
The mesial-distal placement of the first repositioning jaw element 706-1 and the second repositioning jaw element 708-1 can include a particular placement adjacent to posterior teeth therein based on the first treatment stage. For instance, the placement can be based on an incremental distance of the particular treatment stage. Based on the mesial-distal placement of the first repositioning jaw element 706-1 and the second repositioning jaw element 708-1 of the first treatment stage, the patient's jaw can be repositioned to a first incremental position and/or distance.
A second treatment stage can include a first repositioning jaw element 706-2 that extends from a surface of a first shell 714-2 configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of the patient's upper dentition. A second repositioning jaw element 708-2 can extend from a surface of a second shell 716-2 configured to receive and reposition a number of teeth of the patient's lower dentition.
The mesial-distal placement of the second repositioning jaw element 708-2 of the second treatment stage can be shifted in a distal direction from the mesial-distal placement of the second repositioning jaw element 708-1 of the first treatment stage. The shift in mesial-distal placement can be based on the incremental distance of the particular treatment stage. The shift can include, for example, a particular distance value x 794 (e.g., shift in a distal direction by a distance value of x 794). The first repositioning jaw element 706-2 of the second treatment stage can be the same mesial-distal placement as the first repositioning jaw element 706-1 of the first treatment stage and/or can be shifted, in various embodiments. Based on the mesial-distal placements of the first repositioning jaw element 706-2 and the second repositioning jaw element 708-2 of the second treatment stage, the patient's jaw can be repositioned to a second incremental position and/or distance.
Although the present embodiments of
Geometric features 851-1 . . . 851-4, as used herein, can include a variety of protruding geometric shapes (e.g., cylinder, rectangular, etc.) and/or receding geometric shapes (e.g., negative space that matches the protruding geometric shape on a repositioning jaw element on an opposing jaw). For example, a geometric feature 851-1 on the first surface of the first repositioning jaw element 806 of a first shell 814 can include a concave shaped feature and a geometric feature 851-2 on the second surface of the second repositioning jaw element 808 of a second shell 816 can include a convex shaped feature shaped to mate with the geometric feature 851-1 on the first surface of the first repositioning jaw element 806.
Similarly, a geometric feature 851-3 on the third surface of the third repositioning jaw element 810 of the first shell 814 can include a concave shaped feature and a geometric feature 851-4 on the fourth surface of the fourth repositioning jaw element 812 of the second shell 816 can include a convex shaped feature shaped to mate with the geometric feature 851-3 on the third surface of the third repositioning jaw element 810.
The repositioning jaw element 803 can, for instance, include an occlusal surface that has a geometry shaped to mate with the contours of the occlusal surfaces of the second shell 816. The mating can, for instance, be designed to reposition the jaw of the patient by guiding the lower jaw of the patient into a forward position or backward position (e.g., to move sagittally).
The magnets within the repositioning jaw elements 806, 808 on opposing jaws can be opposite poles and/or same poles to guide the lower jaw to a position. For example, opposite poles on magnets can be used to attract the lower jaw into the forward position and/or same poles on magnets can be used to push the lower jaw into the forward position.
Although the embodiments of
The groove 953 of the repositioning jaw element 907 can include, for instance, a hollow channel located within and/or on a surface of the repositioning jaw element 907 that is angled (e.g., a surface of the repositioning jaw element 907 that is designed to interface, interact, and/or engage with another repositioning jaw element and/or shell). The groove 953 can be shaped to mate with a geometric feature 909 on a second shell 916 on an opposite jaw. The geometric feature 909 on the second shell 916 on the opposite jaw can include a cylinder shaped feature that can rotate and/or slide down the angled surface of the repositioning jaw element 907 of the first shell 914 until the groove 953 is reached. That is, the groove 953 can limit and/or stop movement of the geometric feature 909 on the second shell 916. The groove 953 and geometric feature 909 combination can, for instance, allow for greater freedom of motion of the lower jaw while repositioning the lower jaw to a forward position or backward position.
In some embodiments, a first repositioning jaw element of a first shell 914 and a second repositioning jaw element of a second shell 916 can include geometric features. For instance, geometric features of a first repositioning jaw element and/or a second repositioning jaw element can include a protrusion and a socket. For example, a first repositioning jaw element can include a protrusion extending from the first repositioning jaw element in a direction toward occlusal surfaces teeth of the opposing jaw. The second repositioning jaw element can include a socket within the second repositioning jaw element. The protrusion of the first repositioning jaw element can fit into the socket of the second repositioning jaw element to assist in guiding the lower jaw into a forward position or a backward position.
Further, in various embodiments, a dental appliance of the present disclosure can include one or more repositioning jaw elements having a structure to indicate to a patient that the patient has positioned the first and second repositioning jaw elements of the first shell and second shell in a fully engaged sagittal jaw position. For example, in the embodiment of
In a number of examples, a variety of features can be used in addition to and/or in place of repositioning jaw elements to guide the lower jaw to a position, such as a forward position or a backward position. Example features can include connecting the first shell and the second shell using material at the sides of the shells in the posterior region, a rigid or flexible connecting structure (e.g., as illustrated by
The rigid or flexible connecting structure 1121 can include a strip of material (e.g., an arm), such as metal, polymer, and/or other material, which can connect the first shell 1114 to the second shell 1116. As illustrated by the embodiment of
These features can allow the connecting structure to be easily installed and removed by the patient. For instance, the rigid or flexible connecting structure 1121 can form a hinge that uses magnetic materials 1123-1, 1123-2, pins 1125-1, 1125, and/or similar features to hold the first shell 1114 and the second shell 116 together while allowing the first shell 1114 and the second shell 116 to rotate. When a patient places the first shell 1114 and the second shell 1116 over their teeth, the patient can place the rigid or flexible connecting structure 1121 near the appropriate location. The magnetic materials 1123-1, 1123-2, in some embodiments, can snap the rigid or flexible connecting structure 1121 into the appropriate location (e.g., from a close and/or near appropriate location to the appropriate location). A wire can be placed on a lingual surface of the second shell 1116 (e.g., lower jaw) to distribute the load evening across the dental arch, in various embodiments.
As illustrated by the embodiment of
For instance, as illustrated by the embodiment of
For instance, the attachment elements 1233-1 . . . 1233-5 can be added directly to a buccal/facial and/or lingual surface of a patient's tooth. An attachment element, as used herein, can include an attachment sub-device with a small base extending across a mesial-distal and/or incisal-gingival-crown surface of the tooth. The attachment elements 1233-1 . . . 1233-5 can be bonded to any surface of the tooth (and be made either indirectly (e.g. a light or chemical-cured dental composite) or directly (e.g. prefabricated plastic, composite, or porcelain object)). An attachment element bonded to a lingual surface of a tooth of the patient can be more aesthetically pleasing to a patient (and less noticeable to others than an attachment element bonded to a buccal/facial surface). The attachment elements 1233-1 . . . 1233-5 can also be attached to at least some of the anchoring teeth. The attachment elements 1233-1 . . . 1233-5 can include a variety of geometric shapes, such as ovoid, tear-drop, ramp, hexagonal, and/or rectangular, among other shapes.
The one or more attachment elements 1233-1 . . . 1233-5 can be designed to work with a virtual model of a removable dental appliance and/or a physical removable dental appliance. The shell can be shaped, for instance, to be placed over the attachment element(s) 1233-1 . . . 1233-5 to minimize and/or prevent vertical displacement of the shell. For example, the shell can include a ridge on the shell used to retain the dental appliance on the teeth. The attachment elements 1233-1 . . . 1233-5 can, for instance, provide friction between the dental appliance and the teeth to increase retention of the dental appliance. That is, the attachment elements 1233-1 . . . 1233-5 can create greater retention of the dental appliance in a particular direction.
In various embodiments, at least one of the repositioning jaw elements 1206, 1208, 1210, 1212 can be shaped to minimize and/or prevent degrading the retention and/or functionality of the shell of the dental appliance. For example, as illustrated in the embodiment of
A side surface feature, as used herein, can extend beyond the occlusal plane of a removable dental appliance to engage with buccal and lingual coronal side surfaces of at least one tooth and/or a removable dental appliance on the opposite jaw of the patient. The side surface features can, for instance, add retention to molar teeth to balance movement created by the repositioning jaw elements and/or prevent and/or limit a posterior surface of the removable dental appliance from contacting molars. That is, although not illustrated by the embodiments of
The side surface features 1335-1, 1335-2, 1337-1, 1337-2, as illustrated by
In accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure, the repositioning jaw elements can be used to adjust a midline of a patient. A midline of a patient, as used herein, can include a midsagittal line of the teeth of the upper jaw and the teeth of the lower jaw of the patient.
For instance, repositioning jaw elements can be placed on the right and left posterior side of a shell for the upper jaw and the right and left posterior side of a shell for the lower jaw. The surfaces of repositioning jaw elements on the shell of each jaw that are designed to interface, interact, and/or engage surfaces of repositioning jaw elements on an opposing jaw can be angled at the same angle and/or opposite angles, in various instances. For example, for minor adjustment to the midline of a patient, the surfaces of repositioning jaw elements on the shell of a jaw (e.g., upper or lower) can be angled at opposing angles. In contrast, for larger adjustments to the midline of the patient, the surfaces of repositioning jaw elements (e.g., the right and left posterior side) on the shell of a jaw (e.g., upper or lower) can be angled at the same angle.
In various embodiments, the guidance of the lower jaw 1404 in a mesial-distal direction can be concurrent with guiding the lower jaw 1404 in a forward or backward direction (e.g., anterior-posterior direction). That is, the midline of the patient can be adjusted concurrently with adjusting the sagittal jaw position of the patient using the repositioning jaw elements 1406, 1408, 1410, 1412.
As illustrated by the embodiment of
Further, the embodiments illustrated by
Listing of Exemplary Embodiments
A. A removable dental appliance comprising:
B. The removable dental appliance of claim A, wherein at least one of the first repositioning jaw element and the second repositioning jaw element are positioned to generate distalizing force on at least some of the teeth within.
C. The removable dental appliance of claim A, wherein:
D. The removable dental appliance of claim C, wherein the first geometric feature includes a protrusion and the second geometric feature includes a socket.
E. The removable dental appliance of claim A, wherein at least one of the first repositioning jaw element and the second repositioning jaw element include a layer of compressible material on a surface.
F. The removable dental appliance of claim A, wherein at least one of the first surface and the second surface are angled to adjust a midline of patient.
G. The removable dental appliance of claim A, wherein the first repositioning jaw element and the second repositioning jaw elements include occlusal surfaces to follow contours of occlusal surfaces of teeth on an opposing jaw.
H. The removable dental appliance of claim A, wherein at least one of the first repositioning jaw element and the second repositioning jaw element include side surface features that extend beyond the occlusal plane of the removable dental appliance to engage with at least one of a buccal and a lingual side surfaces of a shell of an opposite jaw.
I. The removable dental appliance of claim A, wherein the first repositioning jaw element and the second repositioning jaw element are positioned near at least one of an unerupted and a removed molar tooth of the patient.
J. The removable dental appliance of claim A, wherein the first shell and the second shell include a plurality of repositioning jaw elements extending from at least one of a buccal and lingual surface of the first shell and the second shell.
K. The removable dental appliance of claim A, wherein the first repositioning jaw element and the second repositioning jaw element include at least a magnet within to interact and guide the lower jaw into a position.
L. The removable dental appliance of claim A, wherein at least one of the first repositioning jaw element and the second repositioning jaw element includes a top surface with a wider buccal-lingual width than a buccal-lingual width of a bottom surface.
M. A removable dental appliance comprising:
N. The removable dental appliance of claim M, wherein:
O. The removable dental appliance of claim M, wherein the first shell and the second shell include occlusal surfaces with a geometry that differs from the contours of the occlusal surfaces of the teeth of an opposing jaw.
P. The removable dental appliance of claim M, wherein:
Q. The removable dental appliance of claim M, wherein the first shell and the second shell each include a plurality of ridges on occlusal surfaces to guide the jaw into a position.
R. The removable dental appliance of claim M, wherein the first shell and the second shell include pairs of magnets within occlusal surfaces of the first shell and the second shell to interact and guide the jaw of the patient into a position.
S. The removable dental appliance of claim M, wherein occlusal surfaces of the first shell and the second shell include a geometry to match a jaw position.
T. The removable dental appliance of claim M, wherein the first shell and the second shell are connected by a rigid or flexible connecting structure to move a lower jaw into a position.
U. The removable dental appliance of claim M, wherein the first shell and the second shell are connected by material at a right posterior side and a left posterior side of the first shell and the second shell.
V. The removable dental appliance of claim M, wherein:
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same techniques can be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments of the disclosure.
It is to be understood that the above description has been made in an illustrative fashion, and not a restrictive one. Combination of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the various embodiments of the disclosure includes any other applications in which the above structures and methods are used. Therefore, the scope of various embodiments of the disclosure should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full range of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
In the foregoing Detailed Description, various features are grouped together in example embodiments illustrated in the figures for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the embodiments of the disclosure require more features than are expressly recited in each claim.
Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/186,856, filed Feb. 21, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,844,424, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and to which application we claim priority under 35 USC § 120.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2171695 | Harper | Sep 1939 | A |
| 2467432 | Kesling | Apr 1949 | A |
| 2531222 | Kesling | Nov 1950 | A |
| 3379193 | Monsghan | Apr 1968 | A |
| 3385291 | Martin | May 1968 | A |
| 3407500 | Kesling | Oct 1968 | A |
| 3478742 | Bohlmann | Nov 1969 | A |
| 3496936 | Gores | Feb 1970 | A |
| 3600808 | Reeve | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3660900 | Andrews | May 1972 | A |
| 3683502 | Wallshein | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3738005 | Cohen et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3860803 | Levine | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3916526 | Schudy | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3922786 | Lavin | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3950851 | Bergersen | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3983628 | Acevedo | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4014096 | Dellinger | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4195046 | Kesling | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4253828 | Coles et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4324546 | Heitlinger et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4324547 | Arcan et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4348178 | Kurz | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4419992 | Chorbajian | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4478580 | Barrut | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4500294 | Lewis | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4504225 | Yoshii | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4505673 | Yoshii | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4509918 | Clark | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4526540 | Dellinger | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4575330 | Hull | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4575805 | Moermann et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4591341 | Andrews | May 1986 | A |
| 4609349 | Cain | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4611288 | Duret et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4656860 | Orthuber et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4663720 | Duret et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4664626 | Kesling | May 1987 | A |
| 4676747 | Kesling | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4742464 | Duret et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4755139 | Abbatte et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4763791 | Halverson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4793803 | Martz | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4798534 | Breads | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4836778 | Baumrind et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4837732 | Brandestini et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4850864 | Diamond | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4850865 | Napolitano | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4856991 | Breads et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4877398 | Kesling | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4880380 | Martz | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4889238 | Batchelor | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4890608 | Steer | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4935635 | O'Harra | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4936862 | Walker et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4937928 | Van Der Zel | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4941826 | Loran et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4964770 | Steinbichler et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4975052 | Spencer et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4983334 | Adell | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5011405 | Lemchen | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5017133 | Miura | May 1991 | A |
| 5027281 | Rekow et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5035613 | Breads et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5055039 | Abbatte et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5059118 | Breads et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5100316 | Wildman | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5103838 | Yousif | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5121333 | Riley et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5125832 | Kesling | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5128870 | Erdman et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5130064 | Smalley et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5131843 | Hilgers et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5131844 | Marinaccio et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5139419 | Andreiko et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5145364 | Martz et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5176517 | Truax | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5184306 | Erdman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5186623 | Breads et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5257203 | Riley et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5273429 | Rekow et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5278756 | Lemchen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5324196 | Magill | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5328362 | Watson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5338198 | Wu et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5340309 | Robertson | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342202 | Deshayes | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5368478 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5382164 | Stern | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5395238 | Andreiko et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5431562 | Andreiko et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5440326 | Quinn | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5440496 | Andersson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5447432 | Andreiko et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5452219 | Dehoff et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5454717 | Andreiko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5456600 | Andreiko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5474448 | Andreiko et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| RE35169 | Lemchen et al. | Mar 1996 | E |
| 5499633 | Fenton | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5518397 | Andreiko et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5528735 | Strasnick et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5533895 | Andreiko et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5542842 | Andreiko et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549476 | Stern | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5562448 | Mushabac | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5587912 | Andersson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5605459 | Kuroda et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607305 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5614075 | Andre, Sr. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5621648 | Crump | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5645420 | Bergersen | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5645421 | Slootsky | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5655653 | Chester | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5683243 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5683244 | Truax | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5692894 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5725376 | Poirier | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5725378 | Wang | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733126 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5740267 | Echerer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5742700 | Yoon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5794627 | Frantz et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5799100 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5800174 | Andersson | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5823778 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5848115 | Little et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5857853 | Van Nifterick et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5866058 | Batchelder et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5879158 | Doyle et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5880961 | Crump | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5880962 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5934288 | Avila et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5957686 | Anthony | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5964587 | Sato | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5971754 | Sondhi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5975893 | Chishti et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6015289 | Andreiko et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6044309 | Honda | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6049743 | Baba | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6062861 | Andersson | May 2000 | A |
| 6068482 | Snow | May 2000 | A |
| 6099314 | Kopelman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6123544 | Cleary | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6152731 | Jordan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6183248 | Chishti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6190165 | Andreiko et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6200133 | Kittelsen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6217325 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217334 | Hultgren | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6244861 | Andreiko et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6309215 | Phan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6315553 | Sachdeva et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322359 | Jordan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6350120 | Sachdeva et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6382975 | Poirier | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6398548 | Muhammad et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6402707 | Ernst | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6405729 | Thornton | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6450807 | Chishti et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6482298 | Bhatnagar | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6516805 | Thornton | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6524101 | Phan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6554611 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6572372 | Phan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6604527 | Palmisano | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6629840 | Chishti et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6705863 | Phan et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6722880 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6749414 | Hanson et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6830450 | Knopp et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 7226287 | Abels et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7293987 | Abels et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7357637 | Leichtung et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7637262 | Bailey | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7892474 | Shkolnik et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 8001973 | Sotos et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8013853 | Douglas et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| 8025063 | Sotos et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8037886 | Sotos et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8215312 | Garabadian et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8297286 | Smernoff | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8449296 | Liechtung et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8573224 | Thornton | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8839793 | Diaz | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8870566 | Bergersen | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 9545331 | Ingemarsson-Matzen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9744006 | Ross | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9844424 | Wu et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 10299894 | Tanugula et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 20020006597 | Andreiko et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009252 | Pavlovskaia et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030031976 | Clark | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030075186 | Florman | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139834 | Nikolskiy et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030207224 | Lotte | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224311 | Cronauer | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224313 | Bergersen | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040058295 | Bergersen | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128010 | Pavlovskaia et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040209218 | Chishti et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050055118 | Nikolskiy et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050136371 | Abolfathi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244781 | Abels et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060008760 | Phan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078840 | Robson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060099546 | Bergersen | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20070092850 | Kaza | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20080020337 | Phan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080057466 | Jordan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080115791 | Heine | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080268400 | Moss et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090032030 | Callender et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090068617 | Lauren | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20100138025 | Morton et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20110005527 | Andrew et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184762 | Chishti | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20120295211 | Frantz | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130089828 | Borovinskih et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130095446 | Andreiko et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130122448 | Kitching | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130160776 | Petelle | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204583 | Matov et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130297275 | Sanchez | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130317800 | Wu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140060549 | Lucas | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140061974 | Tyler et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140120490 | Borovinskih et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142897 | Kuo | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140265034 | Dudley et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140370465 | Lucas | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150097315 | Desimone et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150097316 | Desimone et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150102532 | Desimone et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150157423 | Muslin | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150238280 | Wu et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150238283 | Tanugula et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150238284 | Wu et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20160106521 | Tanugula et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160128803 | Webber et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160199216 | Cam et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160361139 | Webber et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170035533 | Ross | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20180147028 | Warshawsky et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20190125497 | Derakhshan et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3031677 | May 1979 | AU |
| 517102 | Jul 1981 | AU |
| 5598894 | Jun 1994 | AU |
| 1121955 | Apr 1982 | CA |
| 105997274 | Oct 2016 | CN |
| 2749802 | May 1978 | DE |
| 69327661 | Jul 2000 | DE |
| 102004007008 | Sep 2005 | DE |
| 202010017014 | Feb 2011 | DE |
| 102012005323 | Sep 2013 | DE |
| 0091876 | Oct 1983 | EP |
| 0299490 | Jan 1989 | EP |
| 0376873 | Jul 1990 | EP |
| 0490848 | Jun 1992 | EP |
| 0541500 | May 1993 | EP |
| 0667753 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 0774933 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 0731673 | May 2001 | EP |
| 1094761 | Oct 2008 | EP |
| 463897 | Jan 1980 | ES |
| 2455066 | Apr 2014 | ES |
| 2369828 | Jun 1978 | FR |
| 2652256 | Mar 1991 | FR |
| 1550777 | Aug 1979 | GB |
| S5358191 | May 1978 | JP |
| H0428359 | Jan 1992 | JP |
| H08508174 | Sep 1996 | JP |
| 2005161081 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 4184427 | Nov 2008 | JP |
| 2010528748 | Aug 2010 | JP |
| 2011500142 | Jan 2011 | JP |
| 2011120928 | Jun 2011 | JP |
| 20130111848 | Oct 2013 | KR |
| WO-9008512 | Aug 1990 | WO |
| WO-9104713 | Apr 1991 | WO |
| WO-9410935 | May 1994 | WO |
| WO-9832394 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO-9844865 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO-9858596 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO-0170126 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO-0180762 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO-02062252 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| 2010087824 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| WO-2011126854 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| WO-2012140021 | Oct 2012 | WO |
| WO-2013102095 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| WO-2014060595 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| WO-2019069163 | Apr 2019 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| AADR. American Association for Dental Research, Summary of Activities, Mar. 20-23, 1980, Los Angeles, CA, p. 195. |
| Alcaniz, et al, “An Advanced System for the Simulation and Planning of Orthodontic Treatments,” Karl Heinz Hohne and Ron Kikinis (eds.), Visualization in Biomedical Computing, 4th Intl. Conf., VBC '96, Hamburg, Germany, Sep. 22-25, 1996, Springer-Verlag, pp. 511-520. |
| Alexander et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station Part 2 Clinical Management,” JCO, pp. 402-407 (Jul. 1990). |
| Altschuler, “3D Mapping of Maxillo-Facial Prosthesis,” AADR Abstract #607, 2 pages total, (1980). |
| Altschuler et al., “Analysis of 3-D Data for Comparative 3-D Serial Growth Pattern Studies of Oral-Facial Structures,” IADR Abstracts, Program and Abstracts of Papers, 57th General Session, IADR Annual Session, Mar. 29, 1979-Apr. 1, 1979, New Orleans Marriot, Journal of Dental Research, vol. 58, Jan. 1979, Special Issue A, p. 221. |
| Altschuler et al., “Laser Electro-Optic System for Rapid Three-Dimensional (3D) Topographic Mapping of Surfaces,” Optical Engineering, 20(6):953-961 (1981). |
| Altschuler et al., “Measuring Surfaces Space-Coded by a Laser-Projected Dot Matrix,” SPIE Imaging Applications for Automated Industrial Inspection and Assembly, vol. 182, p. 187-191 (1979). |
| Andersson et al., “Clinical Results with Titanium Crowns Fabricated with Machine Duplication and Spark Erosion,” Acta. Odontol. Scand., 47:279-286 (1989). |
| Andrews, The Six Keys to Optimal Occlusion Straight Wire, Chapter 3, pp. 13-24 (1989). |
| “AnotherInvisalignBlog. Invisalign Virtual Bite Ramps. Posted Jun. 17, 2012. 5 pages. Retrieved Aug. 14, 2013 from http://anotherinvisalignblog.wordpress.com/2012/06/17/invisalign-lingual-power-ridges-photos/.” |
| Bartels, et al., An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 422-425 (1987). |
| Baumrind, “A System for Craniofacial Mapping Through the Integration of Data from Stereo X-Ray Films and Stereo Photographs,” an invited paper submitted to the 1975 American Society of Photogram Symposium on Close-Range Photogram Systems, University of Ill., Aug. 26-30, 1975, pp. 142-166. |
| Baumrind et al., “A Stereophotogrammetric System for the Detection of Prosthesis Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” NATO Symposium on Applications of Human Biostereometrics, Jul. 9-13, 1978, SPIE, vol. 166, pp. 112-123. |
| Baumrind et al., “Mapping the Skull in 3-D,” reprinted from J. Calif. Dent. Assoc., 48(2), 11 pages total, (1972 Fall Issue). |
| Baumrind, “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping: Background, Principles, and Perspectives,” Semin. in Orthod., 7(4):223-232 (Dec. 2001). |
| Begole et al., “A Computer System for the Analysis of Dental Casts,” The Angle Orthod., 51(3):253-259 (Jul. 1981). |
| Bernard et al.,“Computerized Diagnosis in Orthodontics for Epidemiological Studies: A Progress Report,” Abstract, J. Dental Res. Special Issue, vol. 67, p. 169, paper presented at International Association for Dental Research 66th General Session, Mar. 9-13, 1988, Montreal, Canada. |
| Bhatia et al., “A Computer-Aided Design for Orthognathic Surgery,” Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 22:237-253 (1984). |
| Biggerstaff, “Computerized Diagnostic Setups and Simulations,” Angle Orthod., 40(1):28-36 (Jan. 1970). |
| Biggerstaff et al., “Computerized Analysis of Occlusion in the Postcanine Dentition,” Am. J. Orthod., 61(3): 245-254 (Mar. 1972). |
| Biostar Opeation & Training Manual. Great Lakes Orthodontics, Ltd. 199 Fire Tower Drive, Tonawanda, New York. 14150-5890, 20 pages total (1990). |
| “Bite Ramps. Align Orthodontics. http://www.alignortho.com/Portals/0/pdf/BITE%20RAMPS.pdf.” |
| Blu, et al., “Linear interpolation revitalized”, IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 13(5):710-719 (May 2004. |
| Bourke, “Coordinate System Transformation,” (Jun. 1996), p. 1, retrieved from the Internet Nov. 5, 2004, URL< http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/—pbourke/prolection/coords>. |
| Boyd et al., “Three Dimensional Diagnosis and Orthodontic Treatment of Complex Malocclusions With the Invisalipn Appliance,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):274-293 (Dec. 2001). |
| Brandestini et al., “Computer Machined Ceramic Inlays: In Vitro Marginal Adaptation,” J. Dent. Res. Special Issue, Abstract 305, vol. 64, p. 208 (1985). |
| Brook et al., “An Image Analysis System for the Determination of Tooth Dimensions from Study Casts: Comparison with Manual Measurements of Mesio-distal Diameter,” J. Dent. Res., 65(3):428-431 (Mar. 1986). |
| Burstone et al., Precision Adjustment of the Transpalatal Lingual Arch: Computer Arch Form IN Predetermination, Am, Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 79, No. 2 (Feb. 1981), pp. 115-133. |
| Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on The Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 1),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(7):442-453 (Jul. 1979). |
| Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on The Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 2),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(8):539-551 (Aug. 1979). |
| Cardinal Industrial Finishes, Powder Coatings information posted at<http://www.cardinalpaint.com> on Aug. 25, 2000, 2 pages. |
| Carnaghan, “An Alternative to Holograms for the Portrayal of Human Teeth,” 4th Int'l. Conf. on Holographic Systems, Components and Applications, Sep. 15, 1993, pp. 228-231. |
| Chaconas et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station, Part 1, Basic Concepts,” JCO, pp. 360-367 (Jun. 1990). |
| Chafetz et al., “Subsidence of the Femoral Prosthesis, A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., No. 201, pp. 60-67 (Dec. 1985). |
| Chiappone, (1980). Constructing the Gnathologic Setup and Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 14, pp. 121-133. |
| Co I I Ingham, (1969). Gnathologic Clear Plastic Positioner, Am. J. Orthod, vol. 55, pp. 23-31. |
| Crawford, “CAD/CAM in the Dental Office: Does It Work?”, Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 121-123 (Feb. 1991). |
| Crawford, “Computers in Dentistry: Part 1 CAD/CAM: The Computer Moves Chairside, Part 2 F. Duret—A Man with a Vision, Part 3 The Computer Gives New Vision—Literally, Part 4 Bytes 'N Bites—The Computer Moves from the Front Desk to the Operatory,” Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 54 (9), pp. 661-666 (1988). |
| Crooks, “CAD/CAM Comes to USC,” USC Dentistry, pp. 14-17 (Spring 1990). |
| Cureton, Correcting Malaligned Mandibular Incisors with Removable Retainers, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 30, No. 7 (1996) pp. 390-395. |
| Curry et al., “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping at the Craniofacial Research Instrumentation Laboratory/University of the Pacific,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):258-265 (Dec. 2001). |
| Cutting et a/., “Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Design of Craniofacial Surgical Procedures: Optimization and Interaction with Cephalometric and CT-Based Models,” Plast. 77(6):877-885 (Jun. 1986). |
| DCS Dental AG, “The CAD/CAM ‘DCS Titan System’ for Production of Crowns/Bridges,” DSC Production AG, pp. 1-7 (Jan. 1992. |
| Definition for gingiva. Dictionary.com p. 1-3. Retrieved from the internet Nov. 5, 2004<http://reference.com/search/search?q=gingiva>. |
| Defranco et al., “Three-Dimensional Large Displacement Analysis of Orthodontic Appliances,” J. Biomechanics, 9:793-801 (1976). |
| Dental Institute University of Zurich Switzerland, Program for International Symposium JD on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the CEREC-Method, May 1991, 2 pages total. |
| Dentrac Corporation, Dentrac document, pp. 4-13 (1992). |
| Dent-x posted on Sep. 24, 1998 at< http://www.dent-x.com/DentSim.htm>, 6 pages. |
| Doyle, “Digital Dentistry,” Computer Graphics World, pp. 50-52, 54 (Oct. 2000). |
| “Dr. Jonathan Nicozisis. Techniques for Deep Bite Correction with Invisalign. Clinical Tips & Techniques. http://www.princetonorthodontics.net/Portals/0/Nicozisis_DeepBiteCorrection_Invisalign_new0628.pdf.” |
| “Dr. William V. Gierie. Techniques for Deep Bite Correction with Invisalign Virtual Bite Ramps. Clinical Tips & Techniques.” |
| DuraClearTM product information, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab, 1 page (1997). |
| Duret et al., “CAD/CAM Imaging in Dentistry,” Curr. Opin. Dent., 1:150-154 (1991). |
| Duret et al., “CAD-CAM in Dentistry,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 117:715-720 (Nov. 1988). |
| Duret, “The Dental CAD/CAM, General Description of the Project,” Hennson International Product Brochure, 18 pages total, Jan. 1986. |
| Duret,“Vers Une Prosthese Informatisee,” (English translation attached), Tonus, vol. 75, pp. 55-57 (Nov. 15, 1985). |
| Economides, “The Microcomputer in the Orthodontic Office,” JCO, pp. 767-772 (Nov. 1979). |
| Elsasser, Some Observations on the History and Uses of the Kesling Positioner, Am. J. Orthod. (1950) 36:368-374. |
| English translation of Japanese Laid-Open Publication No. 63-11148 to inventor T. Ozukuri (Laid-Open on Jan. 18, 1998) pp. 1-7. |
| Felton et al., “A Computerized Analysis of the Shape and Stability of Mandibular Arch Form,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(6):478-483 (Dec. 1987). |
| Friede et al., “Accuracy of Cephalometric Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery,” Abstract of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:754-760 (1987). |
| Futterling et a/., “Automated Finite Element Modeling of a Human Mandible with Dental Implants,” JS WSCG '98—Conference Program, retrieved from the Internet:<http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/papers98/Strasser98.pdf>, 8 pages. |
| Gao et al., “3-D element Generation for Multi-Connected Complex Dental and Mandibular Structure,” Proc. Intl Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality, pp. 267-271 (Jun. 12, 2001). |
| GIM-Alldent Deutschland, “Das DUX System: Die Technik,” 2 pages total (2002). |
| Gottleib et al., “JCO Interviews Dr. James A. McNamura, Jr., on the Frankel Appliance: Part 2: Clinical 1-1 Management,” J. Clin. Orthod., 16(6):390-407 (Jun. 1982). |
| Grayson, “New Methods for Three Dimensional Analysis of Craniofacial Deformity, Symposium: JW Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxiiofacial Surgery,” AAOMS, 3 pages total, (Sep. 13, 1990). |
| Guess et al., “Computer Treatment Estimates In Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery,” JCO, pp. 262-228 (Apr. 1989). |
| Heaven et a/., “Computer-Based Image Analysis of Artificial Root Surface Caries,” Abstracts of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:528 (Apr. 17-21, 1991). |
| Highbeam Research, “Simulating Stress Put on Jaw,” Tooling & Production [online], Nov. 1996, n pp. 1-2, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL http://static.highbeam.com/t/toolingampproduction/november011996/simulatingstressputonfa . . . >. |
| Hikage, “Integrated Orthodontic Management System for Virtual Three-Dimensional Computer Graphic Simulation and Optical Video Image Database for Diagnosis and Treatment Planning”, Journal of Japan KA Orthodontic Society, Feb. 1987, English translation, pp. 1-38, Japanese version, 46(2), pp. 248-269 (60 pages total). |
| Hoffmann, et al., “Role of Cephalometry for Planning of Jaw Orthopedics and Jaw Surgery Procedures,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), Informatbnen, pp. 375-396 (Mar. 1991). |
| Hojjatie et al., “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Glass-Ceramic Dental Crowns,” J. Biomech., 23(11):1157-1166 (1990). |
| Huckins, “CAD-CAM Generated Mandibular Model Prototype from MRI Data,” AAOMS, p. 96 (1999). |
| Important Tip About Wearing the Red White & Blue Active Clear Retainer System, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab, 1 page 1998). |
| “International search report with written opinion dated Feb. 20, 2017 for PCT/IB2016/057109”. |
| “International search report with written opinion dated Dec. 7, 2015 for PCT/IB2015/001655”. |
| JCO Interviews, Craig Andreiko , DDS, MS on the Elan and Orthos Systems, JCO, pp. 459-468 (Aug. 1994). |
| JCO Interviews, Dr. Homer W. Phillips on Computers in Orthodontic Practice, Part 2, JCO. 1997; 1983:819-831. |
| Jerrold, “The Problem, Electronic Data Transmission and the Law,” AJO-DO, pp. 478-479 (Apr. 1988). |
| Jones et al., “An Assessment of the Fit of a Parabolic Curve to Pre- and Post-Treatment Dental Arches,” Br. J. Orthod., 16:85-93 (1989). |
| JP Faber et al., “Computerized Interactive Orthodontic Treatment Planning,” Am. J. Orthod., 73(1):36-46 (Jan. 1978). |
| Kamada et.al., Case Reports On Tooth Positioners Using LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1984) 26(1): 11-29. |
| Kamada et.al., Construction of Tooth Positioners with LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber and Some Case KJ Reports, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1982) 24(1):1-27. |
| Kanazawa et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurements of the Occlusal Surfaces of Upper Molars in a Dutch Population,” J. Dent Res., 63(11):1298-1301 (Nov. 1984). |
| Kesling, Coordinating the Predetermined Pattern and Tooth Positioner with Conventional Treatment, KN Am. J. Orthod. Oral Surg. (1946) 32:285-293. |
| Kesling et al., The Philosophy of the Tooth Positioning Appliance, American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral surgery. 1945; 31:297-304. |
| Kleeman et al., The Speed Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod. (1996) 30:673-680. |
| Kochanek, “Interpolating Splines with Local Tension, Continuity and Bias Control,” Computer Graphics, ri 18(3):33-41 (Jul. 1984). KM Oral Surgery (1945) 31 :297-30. |
| Kunii et al., “Articulation Simulation for an Intelligent Dental Care System,” Displays 15:181-188 (1994). |
| Kuroda et al., Three-Dimensional Dental Cast Analyzing System Using Laser Scanning, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. (1996) 110:365-369. |
| Laurendeau, et al., “A Computer-Vision Technique for the Acquisition and Processing of 3-D Profiles of 7 KR Dental Imprints: An Application in Orthodontics,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 10(3):453-461 (Sep. 1991. |
| Leinfelder, et al., “A New Method for Generating Ceramic Restorations: a CAD-CAM System,” J. Am. 1-1 Dent. Assoc., 118(6):703-707 (Jun. 1989). |
| “Leonardo Tavares Camardella, et al. Use of a Bite Ramp in Orthodontic Treatment. Apresentado no A.A.O.—Scientific Posters Exhibit N 41-7 de maio de 2006. http://www.cleber.com.br/leonardo/.” |
| Manetti, et al., “Computer-Aided Cefalometry and New Mechanics in Orthodontics,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), Fortschr Kieferorthop. 44, 370-376 (Nr. 5), 1983. |
| McCann, “Inside the ADA,” J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 118:286-294 (Mar. 1989). |
| McNamara et al., “Invisible Retainers,” J. Cfin. Orthod., pp. 570-578 (Aug. 1985). |
| McNamara et al., Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the Mixed Dentition, Needham Press, pp. 347-353 (Jan. 1993). |
| Moermann et al., “Computer Machined Adhesive Porcelain Inlays: Margin Adaptation after Fatigue Stress,” IADR Abstract 339, J. Dent. Res., 66(a):763 (1987). |
| Moles, “Correcting Mild Malalignments—As Easy As One, Two, Three,” AOA/Pro Corner, vol. 11, No. 1, 2 pages (2002). |
| Mormann et al., “Marginale Adaptation von adhasuven Porzellaninlays in vitro,” Separatdruck aus: Schweiz. Mschr. Zahnmed. 95: 1118-1129, 1985. |
| Nahoum, “The Vacuum Formed Dental Contour Appliance,” N. Y. State Dent. J., 30(9):385-390 (Nov. 1964). |
| Nash, “CEREC CAD/CAM Inlays: Aesthetics and Durability in a Single Appointment,” Dent. Today, 9(8):20, 22-23 (Oct. 1990). |
| Nishiyama et al., “A New Construction of Tooth Repositioner by LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber,” J. Nihon Univ. Sch. Dent., 19(2):93-102 (1977). |
| Paul et al., “Digital Documentation of Individual Human Jaw and Tooth Forms for Applications in Orthodontics, Oral Surgery and Forensic Medicine” Proc. of the 24th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON '98), Sep. 4, 1998, pp. 2415-2418. |
| Pinkham, “Foolish Concept Propels Technology,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Jan./Feb. 1989. |
| Pinkham, “Inventor's CAD/CAM May Transform Dentistry,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Sep. 1990. |
| Ponitz, “Invisible Retainers,” Am. J. Orthod., 59(3):266-272 (Mar. 1971). |
| Procera Research Projects, “Procera Research Projects 1993—Abstract Collection,” pp. 3-7; 28 (1993). |
| Proffit et al., Contemporary Orthodontics, (Second Ed.), Chapter 15, Mosby Inc., pp. 470-533 (Oct. 1993. |
| Raintree Essix & ARS Materials, Inc., Raintree Essix, Technical Magazine Table of contents and Essix Appliances,< http://www.essix.com/magazine/defaulthtml> Aug. 13, 1997. |
| Redmond et al., “Clinical Implications of Digital Orthodontics,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 117(2):240-242 (2000). |
| Rekow, “A Review of the Developments in Dental CAD/CAM Systems,” (contains references to Japanese efforts and content of the papers of particular interest to the clinician are indicated with a one line summary of their content in the bibliography), Curr. Opin. Dent., 2:25-33 (Jun. 1992). |
| Rekow, “CAD/CAM in Dentistry: A Historical Perspective and View of the Future,” J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 58(4):283, 287-288 (Apr. 1992). |
| Rekow, “Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Dentistry: A Review of the State of the Art,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 58(4):512-516 (Oct. 1987). |
| Rekow, “Dental CAD-CAM Systems: What is the State of the Art?”, J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 122:43-48 1991. |
| Rekow et al., “CAD/CAM for Dental Restorations—Some of the Curious Challenges,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 38(4):314-318 (Apr. 1991). |
| Rekow et al., “Comparison of Three Data Acquisition Techniques for 3-D Tooth Surface Mapping,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 13(1):344-345 1991. |
| Rekow, “Feasibility of an Automated System for Production of Dental Restorations, Ph.D. Thesis,” Univ, of Minnesota, 244 pages total, Nov. 1988. |
| Richmond et al., “The Development of a 3D Cast Analysis System,” Br. J. Orthod., 13(1):53-54 (Jan. 1986). |
| Richmond et al., “The Development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): Reliability and Validity,” Eur. J. Orthod., 14:125-139 (1992). |
| Richmond, “Recording The Dental Cast In Three Dimensions,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(3):199-206 (Sep. 1987). |
| Rudge, “Dental Arch Analysis: Arch Form, A Review of the Literature,” Eur. J. Orthod., 3(4):279-284 1981. |
| Sakuda et al., “Integrated Information-Processing System In Clinical Orthodontics: An Approach with Use of a Computer Network System,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 101(3): 210-220 (Mar. 1992). |
| Schellhas et al., “Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Surgical Planning,” Arch. Otolamp!. Head NeckSur9., 114:438-442 (Apr. 1988). |
| Schroeder et al., Eds. The Visual Toolkit, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey (1998) Chapters 6, 8 & 9, (pp. 153-210,309-354, and 355-428, respectively. |
| Shilliday, (1971). Minimizing finishing problems with the mini-positioner, Am. J. Orthod. 59:596-599. |
| Siemens, “CEREC—Computer-Reconstruction,” High Tech in der Zahnmedizin, 14 pages total (2004). |
| Sinclair, “The Readers' Corner,” J. Clin. Orthod., 26(6):369-372 (Jun. 1992). |
| Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, CEREC 3D, Manuel utiiisateur, Version 2.0X (in French), 2003,114 pages total. |
| Stoll et al., “Computer-aided Technologies in Dentistry,” (article summary in English, article in German), Dtsch Zahna'rztl Z 45, pp. 314-322 (1990). |
| Sturman, “Interactive Keyframe Animation of 3-D Articulated Models,” Proceedings Graphics Interface '84, May-Jun. 1984, pp. 35-40. |
| The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee HI Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information for doctors. http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/doctorhtml>, 5 pages (May 19, 2003). |
| The Choice is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee HJ Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information for patients,<http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/patients.html>, 2 pages (May 19, 2003). |
| The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information, 6 pages (2003). |
| The Red, White & Blue Way to Improve Your Smile! Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages 1992. |
| Truax L., “Truax Clasp-Less(TM) Appliance System,” Funct. Orthod., 9(5):22-4, 26-8 (Sep.-Oct. 1992). |
| Tru-Tain Orthodontic & Dental Supplies, Product Brochure, Rochester, Minnesota 55902, 16 pages total (1996). |
| U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Automated Crown Replication Using Solid Photography SM,” Solid Photography Inc., Melville NY, Oct. 1977, 20 pages total. |
| U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Holodontography: An Introduction to Dental Laser Holography,” School of Aerospace Medicine Brooks AFB Tex, Mar. 1973, 37 pages total. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/050,342, filed Jun. 20, 1997, 41 pages total. |
| Van Der Linden, “A New Method to Determine Tooth Positions and Dental Arch Dimensions,” J. Dent. Res., 51(4):1104 (Jul.-Aug. 1972). |
| Van Der Linden et al., “Three-Dimensional Analysis of Dental Casts by Means of the Optocom,” J. Dent. Res., p. 1100 (Jul.-Aug. 1972). |
| Van Der Zel, “Ceramic-Fused-to-Metal Restorations with a New CAD/CAM System,” Quintessence Int., 24(11):769-778 (1993. |
| Varady et al., “Reverse Engineering Of Geometric Models—An Introduction,” Computer-Aided Design, 29(4):255-268,1997. |
| Verstreken et al., “An Image-Guided Planning System for Endosseous Oral Implants,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 17(5):842-852 (Oct. 1998). |
| Warunek et al., Physical and Mechanical Properties of Elastomers in Orthodonic Positioners, Am J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop, vol. 95, No. 5, (May 1989) pp. 399-400. |
| Warunek et.al., Clinical Use of Silicone Elastomer Applicances, JCO (1989) XXIII(10):694-700. |
| Wells, Application of the Positioner Appliance in Orthodontic Treatment, Am. J. Orthodont. (1970) 58:351-366. |
| Williams, “Dentistry and CAD/CAM: Another French Revolution,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 2-5 (Jan./Mar. 1987). |
| Williams, “The Switzerland and Minnesota Developments in CAD/CAM,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 50-55 (Apr./Jun. 1987. |
| Wishan, “New Advances in Personal Computer Applications for Cephalometric Analysis, Growth Prediction, Surgical Treatment Planning and Imaging Processing,” Symposium: Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxiiofacial Surgery Presented on Sep. 13, 1990. |
| WSCG'98—Conference Program, “The Sixth International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization '98,” Feb. 9-13, 1998, pp. 1-7, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL<http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/wscg98.h>. |
| Xia et al., “Three-Dimensional Virtual-Reality Surgical Planning and Soft-Tissue Prediction for Orthognathic Surgery,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., 5(2):97-107 (Jun. 2001). |
| Yamamoto et al., “Optical Measurement of Dental Cast Profile and Application to Analysis of Three-Dimensional Tooth Movement in Orthodontics,” Front. Med. Biol. Eng., 1(2):119-130 (1988). |
| Yamamoto et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurement of Dental Cast Profiles and Its Applications to Orthodontics,” Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 12(5):2051-2053 (1990). |
| Yamany et al., “A System for Human Jaw Modeling Using Intra-Oral Images,” Proc. of the 20th Annual Conf, of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Nov. 1, 1998, vol. 2, pp. 563-566. |
| Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); I. The D.P. Concept and Implementation of Transparent Silicone Resin (Orthocon),” Nippon Dental Review, 452:61-74 (Jun. 1980). |
| Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); II. The D.P. Manufacturing Procedure and Clinical Applications,” Nippon Dental Review, 454:107-130 (Aug. 1980). |
| Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); III. The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 1, Dental and Functional Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 457:146-164 (Nov. 1980). |
| Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); III.—The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 2. Skeletal Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 458:112-129 (Dec. 1980). |
| You May Be A Candidate For This Invisible No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages (2002). |
| “Mathematical Modeling Discussion of Optimal Design”, vol. 25, No. 3, Journal of Jiangxi Vocational and Technical College of Electricity (2012) 4 pages. |
| International search report with written opinion dated Jan. 23, 2019 for PCT/US2018/058495. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/745,980, filed Jan. 17, 2020. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/150,740, inventors Tanugula; Rohit et al., filed Jan. 15, 2021. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180132975 A1 | May 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14186856 | Feb 2014 | US |
| Child | 15812127 | US |
