This invention relates to dental articulators.
Dental articulators are well-known tools used by dental practitioners and technicians with dental models, in general for producing, developing or testing dental prostheses or dentures. Articulators are generally meant to provide a relative spatial relationship between the upper and lower jaws, often providing the user with valuable occlusal information, and are hinged to enable the upper and lower dental models to rotate with respect to one another, in a manner that may be analogous to that of a real jaw.
Simple dental articulators allow relative movement between the upper and lower dental models with one degree of freedom only, about the hinge axis, and often the dental models, which are typically made from plaster, are connected to the articulator in a manner that may cause damage to the models when removed therefrom. Extremely complex articulators are also known, which can imitate the occlusal and masticatory movement of a particular patient, but operation of such articulators is complex and may require specialist training.
There are also a range of articulators which provide relative movement between the upper and lower models, in degrees of freedom additional to rotation about the pivot axis of the articulator. Typically, the prior art articulators attempt to locate the pivoting axis at a position corresponding to the condyle.
US 2006/188838 discloses a dental articulator for connecting first and second dental models, and generally includes upper and lower arms hinging at their rear ends by a hinge. Each arm front end is connected by a coupling to a dental model. Each coupling generally includes a ball, a coupling, a rear socket and a fastener joining the coupling and rear socket such that the socket is movable rotationally, up and down, and side to side on the ball to a selected position. The hinge also provides for movements of the arms mimicking those of a human jaw. The lower arm means for adjusting the height of the hinge. Upper and lower dental models each include a holder of an incisor spacing assembly co-cast into the base. The holders hold an incisor pin for adjusting the vertical spacing between the fronts of the dental models.
US 2006/204921 discloses a dental articulator capable of finely adjusting a three-dimensional articulation posture and exerting a secure fastening force by means of a lever is provided. The dental articulator includes: a lower grip plate on which a lower mouth mold is mounted; a column disposed at one end of the lower grip plate; an arm having one end rotatably disposed at upper end of the column; and an upper grip plate disposed at the other end of the arm, wherein a first ball having a shape of sphere is disposed at the other end of the arm, and a second ball having a shape of sphere is disposed at a neck portion erected at a center of the upper grip plate, and wherein the dental articulator further comprises: a first clamp block having spherical recesses spherically contacting with the first and second balls, wherein a screw hole is provided at a central portion of the first clamp block; a second clamp block having spherical recesses spherically contacting with the first and second balls, wherein an engaging bolt hole is provided at a central portion of the second clamp block; a lever disposed on an outer surface of the second clamp block, wherein screw holes are provided to both ends of the lever, wherein an engaging bolt hole is provided to a central portion of the lever; an engaging bolt passing through the engaging bolt hole of the lever and the engaging bolt hole of the second clamp block to be engaged into the screw hole of the first clamp block; and fastening bolts engaged into the screw holes of the lever to shorten a distance between the first and second clamp blocks based on the engagement position.
US 2005/282105 discloses a dental articulator for connecting upper and lower dental models made from dental impressions of teeth and for moving the mandible in opening and closing, protrusive and lateral motions generally comprises upper and lower arms each having a front end for attachment respectively to upper or lower model. The upper arm includes a pair of condylar slots for receiving journals of the lower arm such that the lower arm may perform the opening and closing motion, the protrusive movement, and lateral movement of the mandible. A cantilever spring attached to the upper arm biases the journals toward the centric occlusion position. Slot stops limit protrusive movement and axle stops limit lateral movement.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,385,470 discloses an articulator for simulating jaw movements comprising an upper and a lower part for carrying an upper-jaw and/or lower-jaw model and connected by joints permitting one or more swiveling and linear motions, in which in the joint the lower part is guided relative to the upper part in one or more directions comprising components of motion in the cranial and/or dorsal direction and corresponding to surtrusion and/or retrusion.
According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a dental articulator comprising a first arm hingedly joined to a second arm about a pivot axis, each said arm adapted for mounting a dental model thereto, wherein at least one said arm comprises a bracket member adapted for mounting the respective dental model thereto, a base member adapted for being hingedly joined to the other said arm about said pivot axis, and a magnetic coupling arrangement configured for magnetically affixing the bracket member to the base member.
The articulator comprises a model mounting arrangement configured for enabling the dental model to be releasably mounted to said bracket member, and said model mounting arrangement is different from said magnetic coupling arrangement. The model mounting arrangement is spaced from the magnetic coupling arrangement in a direction substantially different from the direction in which the model is mounted to the model mounting arrangement.
The coupling arrangement is comprised in a mount, which is configured for providing a stable and repeatable relative positioning between the bracket member and the base member in a datum alignment position, while permitting relative movement therebetween in at least two degrees of freedom, for example including two rotational degrees of freedom different from rotation about the pivot axis.
The mount having a first mount part comprised in the base member and a second mount part comprised in the bracket member, and wherein the mount is configured for selectively providing, at least during operation of the articulator, for relative movement between the respective bracket member and the respective base member with respect to a datum alignment position.
The first mount part and second mount part are configured for defining a discrete plurality of contact points therebetween in said datum alignment position, and wherein selective portions of said contact points are disengaged from mutual contact for providing said relative movement. For example, there may be provided a first set of at least four said contact points at said datum alignment position, and a second set of at least four said contact points when carrying out a respective said relative movement. At least some of said contact points in said first set may also be included in said second set. Furthermore, at least some the contact points of said first set may be configured for preventing translational movement in one or two degrees of freedom between the first mount part and the second mount part in said datum alignment position.
In at least some embodiments, four contact points are provided for enabling rotation about each of two lateral axes and for enabling rotation about each of two transverse axes, though in each case at least some of the contact points may be different from those of other cases. The lateral axes are substantially parallel to the pivot axis while the transverse axes are substantially orthogonal to the pivot axis.
In some embodiments, each said contact point is provided between a generally hemispherical projection in one of said first and second mount parts, and a generally cylindrical projection in the other one of said first and second mount parts.
Each one of said first arm and said second arm may comprise a respective said bracket member adapted for mounting a respective dental model thereto, a respective said base member adapted for being hingedly joined to the other said arm about said pivot axis, and a respective said magnetic coupling arrangement configured for magnetically affixing the respective said bracket member to the respective said base member.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a dental articulator comprising a first arm hingedly joined to a second arm about a pivot axis, each said arm adapted for mounting a dental model thereto, wherein at least one said arm comprises a bracket member adapted for mounting the respective dental model thereto, a base member adapted for being hingedly joined to the other said arm about said pivot axis, and a mount having a first mount part comprised in the base member and a second mount part comprised in the bracket member, wherein the mount is configured for selectively providing, at least during operation of the articulator, for relative movement between the respective bracket member and the respective base member with respect to a datum alignment position, and further comprising a coupling arrangement configured for coupling the bracket member to the base member to allow for said relative movement in response to a suitable external force or couple while urging said first mount part into abutting contact with said second mount part to assume said datum alignment position in the absence of the external force or couple.
The articulator may comprise one or more features according to the first aspect of the invention, mutatis mutandis. For example, the coupling arrangement may be a magnetic coupling arrangement configured for magnetically attracting the bracket member the base member with respect to one another.
The articulator may comprise a model mounting arrangement configured for enabling the dental model to be mounted to said bracket member, wherein said model mounting arrangement is different from said magnetic coupling arrangement.
The said mount is configured for providing a stable and repeatable relative positioning between the first mount part and the second mount part in said datum alignment position, while permitting relative movement therebetween in at least two degrees of freedom, for example including two rotational degrees of freedom.
The first mount part and second mount part may be configured for defining a discrete plurality of contact points therebetween in said datum alignment position, and wherein selective portions of said contact points are disengaged from mutual contact for providing said relative movement, for example as disclosed for the first aspect of the invention, mutatis mulandis.
The coupling arrangement may instead comprises a resilient element configured for elastically affixing the bracket member to the base member. For example, the resilient element may comprise a coil spring anchored at one longitudinal end thereof to said base member and at another longitudinal end thereof to said bracket member.
The bracket member may comprise a mounting arrangement adapted for reversibly mounting a dental model thereto. the mounting arrangement may comprise at least one projecting element cantilevered from said bracket member and adapted for reversible engagement with respect to a corresponding aperture provided in said dental model, wherein said at least one projecting element and said corresponding aperture are suitably located such as to provide a desired relative position between said dental model and said pivot axis, at least in said datum position. The projecting element may comprise a radially deformable free end, said free end having a datum dimension larger than a corresponding internal dimension of said aperture, and being radially deformable from said datum dimension to be at least temporarily accommodated inn said aperture when said model is mounted to said bracket member. At least one projecting element is configured such that when said model is mounted thereto, said free end passes through said corresponding aperture and at least partially restores said datum dimension. At least one projecting element comprises a plurality of longitudinal resilient elements circumferentially arranged with respect to a base connected to said bracket member.
At least one said arm may comprise a mechanical stop arrangement to limit pivotal movement of said arms toward one another about said pivot axis.
In at least some embodiments, the two arms may be substantially identical one with respect to another.
According to a third aspect of the invention, there is provided a dental articulator comprising a first arm hingedly joined to a second arm about a pivot axis, each said arm adapted for mounting a dental model thereto, wherein at least one said arm comprises a bracket member adapted for mounting a dental model thereto, articulated with respect to a base member that is adapted for being hingedly joined to the other said arm about said pivot axis, allowing independent movement of the dental model with respect to the pivot axis hingedly linking the arms during operation of the articulator.
The articulator according to the third aspect of the invention may comprise one or more features according to the first aspect of the invention, one or more features according to the second aspect of the invention, mutatis mutandis.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention, there is provided a dental articulator comprising a first arm hingedly joined to a second arm about a pivot axis, each said arm adapted for mounting a dental model thereto, wherein at least one said arm comprises a bracket member adapted for mounting the respective dental model thereto, a base member adapted for being hingedly joined to the other said arm about said pivot axis, and a mount configured for kinematically coupling the respective bracket member and the respective base member. Such kinematic coupling allows for relative movement between the bracket member and the base member in response to a suitable external force or couple while urging the bracket member into abutting contact with base member to assume a datum alignment position in the absence of the external force or couple.
The articulator according to the fourth aspect of the invention may comprise one or more features according to one or more of the first aspect of the invention, and/or of the second aspect of the invention, and/or of the third aspect of the invention, mutatis mutandis.
Herein, by “operation” of the articulator is meant utilization of the articulator after the relative position between the arms and the corresponding dental models has been set up, and includes inducing relative motion between the opposed dental models via the articulator, such as for example to simulate mastication or other movements of the teeth. Thus, the term “operation” with respect to the articulator excludes activities such as alignment and fitting/mounting of the dental models to the articulator.
In order to understand the invention and to see how it may be carried out in practice, embodiments will now be described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
Referring in particular to
Referring in particular to
As best seen in
Referring in particular to
The dynamic mount 50, which dynamically joins together the respective bracket 40 and base member 30, is configured for permitting at least limited relative motion between the bracket 40 and base member 30 in at least two rotational degrees of freedom, independently of any pivoting motion about axis 99: rotation about axes parallel to the pivot axis 99 (and thus parallel to the condyle axis), and rotation about axes orthogonal thereto and to the respective longitudinal axis 93. The dynamic mount 50 is also configured for repeatably enabling the first mount part 52 and the second mount part 56 to assume a datum aligned relationship (also referred to interchangeably herein as a datum alignment relationship or datum alignment position), illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
The pins 91 are glued, bonded, press-fitted or otherwise permanently received in their respective recesses 81, at least during operation and use of the articulator 10.
In alternative variations of this embodiment, the first mount part 52 may be integrally formed, cast, or machined from a blank, rather than made from several components mounted together.
Second mount part 56 comprises four substantially identical spherical balls 96A, 96B, 96C, 96D (for ease of reference the balls will also be referred to collectively or individually by the numeral 96) mounted in a base element 97. Each ball 96 is received in respective laterally spaced parallel recesses 84 (
Thus, when the first mount part 52 and the second mount part 56 are in the aforesaid datum alignment relationship (
The six contact points fix the spatial position of the first mount part 52 with respect to the second mount part 56 in a repeatable manner, i.e., whenever the two mount parts are separated in any manner one from the other they will return to the same datum alignment relationship when brought together again. The six contact points are arranged in such a manner that does not permit relative translations between the first mount part 52 and the second mount part 56 along the x or y axes when in the datum alignment relationship. Relative movement orthogonal to the x and y axis at the datum alignment relationship is prevented by means of coupling arrangement 110, which maintains the two mount parts 52, 56 are held in an abutting contact configuration. Thus, mount 50 operates in a manner similar to a kinematic mount.
In addition to providing a repeatable datum alignment relationship, the dynamic mount 50 is also configured for allowing the second mount part 56 to rotate with respect to the first mount part 52 (and thus allowing rotation of the respective tooth model 100 when mounted to the respective bracket 40 with respect to the respective base element 30) about a virtual or pivot axis parallel to lateral axis x and/or about a virtual or pivot axis parallel to transverse axis y, while the two mount parts 52, 56 are held in a different abutting contact configuration by means of coupling arrangement 110.
Transverse rotation, i.e. rotation about an axis parallel to lateral axis x (and thus parallel to pivot axis 99), may be accomplished in two ways for each mount 50. In a first such rotation, referred to herein as a positive transverse rotation and referring to
Because the outer facing pin of pin pair 90C is further recessed than the inner facing pin or the pins of pin pair 90D, axis x1 will be slightly diverging with respect to axis x, but since Δh is small compared to the depth h of the recesses and spacing a, the axis x1 may be regarded as nominally parallel to axis x.
Virtual axis x1 connects the centers of the balls 96C, 96D when these are in abutting contact with their respective pin pairs. In the second such rotation, referred to herein as a negative transverse rotation, and referring to
Thus, while rotating the second mount part 56 about virtual axis x1 or x2, the second mount part 56 is in contact with the first mount part 52 at four contact points, which provides for stability of the position of the virtual axes. (It is to be noted that in the aforesaid rotations about x1 or x2, the respective 4 contact points in each case are not static, but change with respect to the position of the respective contact points on the respective balls 96, as the respective pairs of balls slidingly rotate over the respective pin pairs.) Moreover, by having the respective axes 101 of pin pair 90A and 90D non parallel to the respective axes 101 of pin pairs 90B and 90C, respectively, translation of the first mount part 52 with respect to the second mount part 56 is prevented in the lateral direction, while the contact configurations prevents corresponding translations in the transverse direction.
In a similar manner, mutatis mutandis, and referring to
Thus, while rotating the second mount part 56 about virtual axis y1 or y2, the second mount part 56 is in contact with the first mount part 52 at two contact points and four contact points, respectively, which provides for stability of the position of the virtual axes. Moreover, by having the respective axis 101 of pin pair 90A non parallel to the respective axis 101 of pin pair 90D, respectively, translation of the first mount part 52 with respect to the second mount part 56 is prevented in the lateral direction when rotating about axis y1. On the other hand, rotation about axis y2 may be accompanied by lateral relative translation between the mount parts 52, 56. The contact configurations prevent corresponding translations in the lateral direction when rotating in the positive or negative transverse directions, which provides another degree of freedom to mount 50.
In alternative variations of this embodiment, the first mount part 52 may comprise the pin pair arrangement while the second mount part 56 comprises the ball arrangement, for example, the first mount part 52 may be comprised in the mounting bracket 40, and the second mount part 54 in the base 30.
In yet other alternative variations of this embodiment, the first mount part 52 may comprise part of the pin pair arrangement and part of the ball arrangement, while the second mount part 56 comprises the corresponding parts of the ball arrangement and the pin arrangement.
In yet other alternative variations of this embodiment, the first mount part 52 may comprise any suitable pin pair arrangement while the second mount part 56 comprises any suitable and corresponding ball arrangement. In one such example three balls may be provided on one mount part, with three pin pairs on the other mount part.
In another variation of this embodiment, and referring to
In yet other alternative variations of this embodiment, the first mount part 52 and the second mount part 56 comprises any suitable floating pivot arrangement that allows lateral and transverse pivoting of one mount part with respect to the other mount part, with respect to each one of two laterally spaced transverse axes and with respect to each one of two transversely spaced lateral axes, respectively.
While in the illustrated embodiment the faces 53 and 57 are substantially planar and substantially orthogonal to the longitudinal axis 93 of the bracket 40, in alternative variations of this embodiment, these faces may be at planes at any desired angle to axis 93, or may comprise any suitable profile, for example concave/convex.
As mentioned earlier, the mount 50 further comprises a magnetic coupling arrangement 110 for providing a restoring force in direction P2 (
The coupling arrangement 110 provides, via said manipulation, for at least some relative movement between the base member 30 and bracket 40, sufficiently for one or more of the balls 90 to fully clear their respective cavities 82, and thus allow the bracket 40 to be rotated with respect to the base member 30 a number of different axes while maintaining contact between other balls 90 and the first mount part 52.
In alternative variations of this embodiment, the coupling arrangement 110 may be replaced instead with any suitable coupling arrangement, including for example a dynamic or flexible connector, such as for example an articulated joint, universal joint, an elastic element, a spring or plurality of springs and so on connected to the bracket 40 and to the base member 30. For example, in the case of an elastic element or spring(s), the coupling arrangement may have an unstressed longitudinal axis substantially parallel or coaxial with a central longitudinal 93 axis of bracket 40, for example, and may be connected to bracket 40 and to base member 30 in a slightly stretched (elastically) and tensioned state, thus storing elastic potential energy, and may elastically stretch further to accommodate the relative movement between the mount parts, and enabling restoration of the latter to the datum aligned position.
In alternative variations of this embodiment, the base elements 30 of the two arms 20A and 20B may be integrally joined, for example via a film hinge arrangement.
The model mounting arrangement 60 is configured for enabling a dental model of part or the full dental arch (upper or lower) to be mounted thereonto. In the illustrated embodiment, such mounting is reversible, but in alternative variations of this embodiment the model mounting arrangement permanently mounts the dental models to the respective arms 20. In yet other alternative variations of this embodiment, the details of the mounting arrangement may vary according to the particular geometry of the dental model, in particular the engagement arrangement thereof, if any.
Referring to
Referring in particular to
For each teeth model 100, the respective teeth representations 105 include a number of teeth on one side of the jaw, representing a number of adjacent molars, for example. However, the teeth representation 105 may instead include a different set of teeth, for example a set of incisors, or half or a full dental arch, and in any case the teeth representation 110 may optionally contain one or more representations of a dental site, including one or more dental preparations in place of corresponding teeth, the preparations being for the purpose of fitting dental prostheses thereto.
The mounting arrangement 60 enables the model 100 to be mounted in a cantilevered manner from the bracket element 40, in particular from one end thereof that is axially opposed to the other end thereof that comprises the second mount part 56. The mounting arrangement 60 comprises a pair of transversely spaced, substantially parallel engagement snap fit prongs 70 that are configured for reversibly engaging with respect to the respective apertures 135 of the corresponding tooth model 100. Each prong 70 comprises a cylindrical base projects from abutment surface 48 of the bar 44 and a resilient portion, cantilevered from the base, and which comprises a plurality of (in this embodiment, four) elongate resilient elements circumferentially arranged with respect to the base and circumferentially spaced via longitudinal gaps. The elements each comprises a sloping portion that radially slopes towards the longitudinal axis 92 of the prong 70, and an enlarged portion at the free end of the prong 70 that radially projects further outwardly than the perimeter of base when the elements are in the datum, unstressed condition. The enlarged portion comprises a conical or rounded free end, a waist portion defining the radially outermost surfaces of enlarged portions, and an engaging shoulder adjacent the sloping portion. Thus, together the plurality of elements form a substantially frustoconical or pyramidal portion comprising the sloping portions, and a bulging portion (comprising the enlarged portions) having a rounded free end.
The external width or diameter of the prong base is just less than the internal width or diameter of the apertures 135, and each prong is configured for enabling the prong elements to be radially elastically deflected inwardly, such that the radially outermost surfaces of enlarged portions, i.e. defining the prong waist, are displaced from axis 92 by a distance substantially equal to the radius of the apertures 135.
The longitudinal length of the prong 70 is greater than the depth of aperture 135, and the latter is substantially similar to the sum of the longitudinal length of the base 72 together with the longitudinal length of the sloping portions of the prong 70 taken along axis 92. In alternative variations of this embodiment, though, the apertures 135 may be diverging or stepped, for example, or otherwise configured, for enabling the prongs 70 to be anchored within the corresponding apertures 135 via the restoring force generated onto the aperture walls by the prong elements.
To engage a tooth model 100 to the corresponding bracket 40, the mounting block 130 is brought into proximity with the bar 44 such that the prongs 70 are aligned with the apertures 135 of the model 100. The mounting block 130 is then pushed towards the abutment surface 48 so that the prongs 70 are received into the apertures 135. In doing so, the corresponding elements of the prongs 70 are elastically deformed, storing elastic potential energy, so as to enable the enlarged portions to pass through the aperture 135, this being facilitated via the rounded free ends. When the block 130 is in abutment with abutment surface 48, the enlarged portions fully clear the apertures 135 and spring back to the unstressed state, or closer thereto, by means of all or part of the elastic potential energy that was previously stored, and the shoulders engage against an outer surface of the block 130 around the mouth of apertures 135. The enlarged portions assume their non stressed configuration, or close thereto, wherein the radius of the waist portion now exceeds the internal radius of the apertures 135, locking the block 130, and thus the respective tooth model 100, in place.
In alternative variations of this embodiment, more than two prongs may be provided, mutatis mutandis, the tooth models 100 being correspondingly configured for being engaged thereto.
In yet other variations of this embodiment, a single prong may be provided, mutatis mutandis, and this may optionally be further configured for preventing relative rotation between the corresponding tooth model and the bracket 40 about the longitudinal axis of the prong, for example comprising a suitable circumferential stop arrangement or a non-axisymmetric cross-section, or alternatively for providing such movement as part of the said variable joint. Alternatively, a single prong may be provided, configured for allowing for rotational movement between the respective tooth model and the bracket 40, providing another degree of freedom to the articulator.
In the illustrated embodiment, to disengage the tooth model 100 from the mounting bracket 40, the block 130 may be pulled away from the abutment surface 48. In doing so, the prong elements are deformed inwardly, and this may be done manually or by means of a tool, for example pliers. Alternatively, the prong shoulders may be suitably sloped or rounded, and/or the mouth of the apertures 135 may also be suitable sloped or rounded, so that as the block 130 is pulled away the elements are automatically pushed inwardly in the radial direction.
To further facilitate disengagement, a quick release probe 49 is provided inn each arm 20 for this embodiment. The probe 49 comprises a pushing element (not shown) at the end of a shaft 49a that is reciprocally mounted freely to the mounting bracket 40 in a direction substantially parallel to axis 92, and located generally inbetween the prongs 70. A knob 49b is provided at the projecting end of the shaft 49a. The pushing element is normally accommodated in a recess (not shown) in the abutment surface 48, so as to enable the pushing element to be flush therewith when in the inactive condition. When it is desired to disengage the tooth model 100, the probe 49 is actuated by pushing the same towards the bracket 40, and the pushing element forces the block 130 away from the bracket 40. Once the enlarged portions of the probe have been deformed and are accommodated in the apertures 135, the model 100 may be fully removed from the bracket 40 with relative ease.
In alternative variations of this embodiment, arms 20A, 20B may not necessarily be identical one to another—for example upper arm 20A may comprise a base member that extends away from the lower arm, and lower arm 20B may comprise a substantially longer base member than the upper arm 20A, such that the two arms are hingedly connected at a position, relative to the teeth models 100, that corresponds to the relative position of the condyle axis in the patient. In yet other variations of this embodiment, the articulator comprise one said arm 20, and the other arm does not comprise mount 50, but rather the bracket member is fixed to the base member 30 in a different manner, for example integrally formed or non-movably fixed with respect to one another.
The arms 20 may be made from or comprise any suitable materials or combination of materials, for example metals (including, for example, aluminum, stainless steel, brass, titanium, and so on), plastics (including for example flexible plastics and/or hard plastics), wood, composites, ceramics, and so on.
In use, once the teeth models 100A, 100B are mounted to arms 20A, 20B, respectively, the user may clasp each model 100A 100B with a different hand and the two models may be manipulated and independently displaced and/or rotated with respect to the corresponding base member 30 to provide an envelope of relative positions between the upper and lower teeth models that enables the range, or at least a portion of the range, of real relative positions between the real teeth to be simulated, providing the user with guidance and feedback, which may be useful for example when designing or testing prostheses.
Illustrated in
Referring to
The transverse and/or lateral rotational movements of the teeth models is accomplished against the coupling force provided by the magnetic coupling arrangement 110, and thus, when the manipulations of the teeth models 100 is terminated, the restoring force provided by the magnetic coupling arrangement brings the teeth model and the articulator back to the datum alignment position.
Thus, the transverse and/or lateral rotational movements provided by the mounts 50, together with pivoting movement via axis 99, enables a range of relative movement between an upper and lower teeth model to be provided, which includes simulated movement at or near the occlusal plane.
Finally, it should be noted that the word “comprising” as used throughout the appended claims is to be interpreted to mean “including but not limited to”.
While there has been shown and disclosed example embodiments in accordance with the invention, it will be appreciated that many changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/737,801, filed Jan. 9, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,814,564, issued Aug. 26, 2014, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/654,735, filed Dec. 30, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,474, issued Feb. 26, 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/193,867, filed Dec. 31, 2008, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2467432 | Kesling | Apr 1949 | A |
2659146 | Erickson et al. | Nov 1953 | A |
3407500 | Kesling | Oct 1968 | A |
3600808 | Reeve | Aug 1971 | A |
3660900 | Andrews | May 1972 | A |
3683502 | Wallshein | Aug 1972 | A |
3738005 | Cohen | Jun 1973 | A |
3860803 | Levine | Jan 1975 | A |
3916526 | Schudy | Nov 1975 | A |
3922786 | Lavin | Dec 1975 | A |
3950851 | Bergersen | Apr 1976 | A |
3983628 | Acevedo | Oct 1976 | A |
4014096 | Dellinger | Mar 1977 | A |
4195046 | Kesling | Mar 1980 | A |
4253828 | Coles et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4324546 | Heitlinger et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4324547 | Arcan et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4337039 | Martin et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4348178 | Kurz | Sep 1982 | A |
4382787 | Huffman | May 1983 | A |
4478580 | Barrut | Oct 1984 | A |
4500294 | Lewis | Feb 1985 | A |
4504225 | Yoshii | Mar 1985 | A |
4505673 | Yoshii | Mar 1985 | A |
4526540 | Dellinger | Jul 1985 | A |
4533323 | Huffman | Aug 1985 | A |
4575330 | Hull | Mar 1986 | A |
4575805 | Moermann et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4591341 | Andrews | May 1986 | A |
4609349 | Cain | Sep 1986 | A |
4611288 | Duret et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4656860 | Orthuber et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4663720 | Duret et al. | May 1987 | A |
4664626 | Kesling | May 1987 | A |
4676747 | Kesling | Jun 1987 | A |
4728330 | Comparetto | Mar 1988 | A |
4742464 | Duret et al. | May 1988 | A |
4755139 | Abbatte et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763791 | Halverson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4793803 | Martz | Dec 1988 | A |
4798534 | Breads | Jan 1989 | A |
4836778 | Baumrind et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4837732 | Brandestini et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4850864 | Diamond | Jul 1989 | A |
4850865 | Napolitano | Jul 1989 | A |
4856991 | Breads et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4877398 | Kesling | Oct 1989 | A |
4880380 | Martz | Nov 1989 | A |
4889238 | Batchelor | Dec 1989 | A |
4890608 | Steer | Jan 1990 | A |
4935635 | O'Harra | Jun 1990 | A |
4936862 | Walker et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4937928 | van der Zel | Jul 1990 | A |
4941826 | Loran et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4964770 | Steinbichler et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4975052 | Spencer et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4983334 | Adell | Jan 1991 | A |
5011405 | Lemchen | Apr 1991 | A |
5017133 | Miura | May 1991 | A |
5027281 | Rekow et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035613 | Breads et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5055039 | Abbatte et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059118 | Breads et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5100316 | Wildman | Mar 1992 | A |
5121333 | Riley et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5125832 | Kesling | Jun 1992 | A |
5128870 | Erdman et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5130064 | Smalley | Jul 1992 | A |
5131843 | Hilgers et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5131844 | Marinaccio et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5139419 | Andreiko et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5145364 | Martz et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5176517 | Truax | Jan 1993 | A |
5184306 | Erdman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186623 | Breads et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5257203 | Riley et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5273429 | Rekow et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5278756 | Lemchen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5328362 | Watson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5338198 | Wu et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340309 | Robertson | Aug 1994 | A |
5342202 | Deshayes | Aug 1994 | A |
5368478 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5382164 | Stern | Jan 1995 | A |
5385470 | Polz | Jan 1995 | A |
5395238 | Andreiko et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5440326 | Quinn | Aug 1995 | A |
5440496 | Andersson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447432 | Andreiko et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452219 | Dehoff et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454717 | Andreiko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456600 | Andreiko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5431562 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474448 | Andreiko et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
RE35169 | Lemchen et al. | Mar 1996 | E |
5518397 | Andreiko et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528735 | Strasnick et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533895 | Andreiko et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542842 | Andreiko et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549476 | Stern | Aug 1996 | A |
5562448 | Mushabac | Oct 1996 | A |
5586884 | Kraus | Dec 1996 | A |
5587912 | Andersson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5605459 | Kuroda et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607305 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614075 | Andre | Mar 1997 | A |
5621648 | Crump | Apr 1997 | A |
5645420 | Bergersen | Jul 1997 | A |
5645421 | Slootsky | Jul 1997 | A |
5655653 | Chester | Aug 1997 | A |
5683243 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692894 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5725376 | Poirier | Mar 1998 | A |
5725378 | Wang | Mar 1998 | A |
5733126 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740267 | Echerer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742700 | Yoon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5799100 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800174 | Andersson | Sep 1998 | A |
5823778 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5848115 | Little et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857853 | van Nifterick et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866058 | Batchelder et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879158 | Doyle et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880961 | Crump | Mar 1999 | A |
5880962 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5934288 | Avila et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5957686 | Anthony | Sep 1999 | A |
5964587 | Sato | Oct 1999 | A |
5971754 | Sondhi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975893 | Chishti et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6015289 | Andreiko et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6044309 | Honda | Mar 2000 | A |
6049743 | Baba | Apr 2000 | A |
6062861 | Andersson | May 2000 | A |
6068482 | Snow | May 2000 | A |
6099314 | Kopelman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123544 | Cleary | Sep 2000 | A |
6152731 | Jordon et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6183248 | Chishti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190165 | Andreiko et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6217325 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217334 | Hultgren | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6234794 | Ozaki | May 2001 | B1 |
6244861 | Andreiko et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6309215 | Phan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315553 | Sachdeva et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318998 | Miller | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322359 | Jordan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6350120 | Sachdeva | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6382975 | Poirier | May 2002 | B1 |
6398548 | Muhammad et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402707 | Ernst | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6482298 | Bhatnagar | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6524101 | Phan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6554611 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6572372 | Phan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6629840 | Chishti et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6705863 | Phan et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6722880 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7220124 | Taub et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7686278 | Lin | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7857622 | Lee | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8382474 | Boltanski | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8814564 | Boltanski | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20010029010 | Wells et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020006597 | Andreiko et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030009252 | Pavlovskaia et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030139834 | Nikolskiy et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030224311 | Cronauer | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040128010 | Pavlovskaia et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050055118 | Nikolskiy et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050282105 | Callne | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060115784 | McMurtry et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060188838 | Callne | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060204921 | Uhm | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210944 | Jung et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20100173258 | Boltanski et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20130189647 | Boltanski et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3031677 | May 1979 | AU |
517102 | Jul 1981 | AU |
5598894 | Jun 1994 | AU |
1121955 | Apr 1982 | CA |
2749802 | May 1978 | DE |
69327661 | Jul 2000 | DE |
0091876 | Oct 1983 | EP |
0299490 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0376873 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0490848 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0541500 | May 1993 | EP |
0667753 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0731673 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0774933 | May 1997 | EP |
463897 | Jan 1980 | ES |
2369828 | Jun 1978 | FR |
2652256 | Mar 1991 | FR |
15500777 | Aug 1979 | GB |
53-058191 | May 1978 | JP |
04-028359 | Jan 1992 | JP |
08-508174 | Sep 1996 | JP |
WO 9008512 | Aug 1990 | WO |
WO 9104713 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO 9410935 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9832394 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9844865 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9858596 | Dec 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
AADR. American Association for Dental Research, Summary of Activities, Mar. 20-23, 1980, Los Angeles, CA, p. 195. |
Alcaniz, et al. “An Advanced System for the Simulation and Planning of Orthodontic Treatments,” Karl HF Heinz Hohne and Ron Kikinis (eds.), Visualization in Biomedical Computing, 4th Intl. Conf., VBC '96, Hamburg, Germany, Sep. 22-25, 1996, Springer-Verlag, pp. 511-520. |
Alexander et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station Part 2 Clinical Management,” JCO, pp. 402-407 (Jul. 1990). |
Altschuler et al., “Analysis of 3-D Data for Comparative 3-D Serial Growth Pattern Studies of Oral-Facial Structures, ” AADR Abstracts, Program and Abstracts of Papers, 57th General Session, IADR HP Annual Session, Mar. 29, 1979-Apr. 1, 1979, New Orleans Marriot, Journal of Dental Research, vol. 58, Jan. 1979, Special Issue A, p. 221. |
Altschuler et al., “Laser Electro-Optic System for Rapid Three-Dimensional (3D) Topographic Mapping of Surfaces,” Optical Engineering, 20(6):953-961 (1981). |
Altschuler et al., “Measuring Surfaces Space-Coded by a Laser-Projected Dot Matrix,” SPIE Imaging Applications for Automated Industrial Inspection and Assembly, vol. 182, p. 187-191 (1979). |
Altschuler, “3D Mapping of Maxillo-Facial Prosthesis,” AADR Abstract #607, 2 pages total, (1980). |
Andersson et al., “Clinical Results with Titanium Crowns Fabricated with Machine Duplication and Spark Erosion,” Acta. Odontol. Scand., 47:279-286 (1989). |
Andrews, The Six Keys to Optimal Occlusion Straight Wire, Chapter 3, pp. 13-24 (1989). |
Bartels, et al., An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 422-425 (1987). |
Baumrind et al., “A Stereophotogrammetric System for the Detection of Prosthesis Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” NATO Symposium on Applications of Human Biostereometrics, Jul. 9-13, 1978, SPIE, vol. 166, pp. 112-123. |
Baumrind et al., “Mapping the Skull in 3-D,” reprinted from J. Calif. Dent. Assoc., 48(2), 11 pages total, (1972 Fall Issue). |
Baumrind, “A System for Craniofacial Mapping Through the Integration of Data from Stereo X-Ray Films and Stereo Photographs,” an invited paper submitted to the 1975 American Society of Photogram Symposium on Close-Range Photogram Systems, University of III., Aug. 26-30, 1975, pp. 142-166. |
Baumrind, “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping: Background, Principles, and Perspectives,” Semin. in Orthod., 7(4):223-232 (Dec. 2001). |
Begole et al., “A Computer System for the Analysis of Dental Casts,” The Angle Orthod., 51(3):253-259 (Jul. 1981). |
Bernard et al.,“Computerized Diagnosis in Orthodontics for Epidemiological Studies: A ProgressReport,” Abstract, J. Dental Res. Special Issue, vol. 67, p. 169, paper presented at International Association for Dental Research 66th General Session, Mar. 9-13, 1988, Montreal, Canada. |
Bhatia et al., “A Computer-Aided Design for Orthognathic Surgery,” Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 22:237-253 (1984). |
Biggerstaff et al., “Computerized Analysis of Occlusion in the Postcanine Dentition,” Am. J. Orthod., 61(3): 245-254 (Mar. 1972). |
Biggerstaff, “Computerized Diagnostic Setups and Simulations,” Angle Orthod., 40(1):28-36 (Jan. 1970). |
Biostar Opeation & Training Manual. Great Lakes Orthodontics, Ltd. 199 Fire Tower Drive,Tonawanda, New York. 14150-5890, 20 pages total (1990). |
Blu, et al., “Linear interpolation revitalized”, IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 13(5):710-719 (May 2004). |
Bourke, “Coordinate System Transformation,” (Jun. 1996), p. 1, retrieved from the Internet Nov. 5, 2004, URL <http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/-pbourke/prolection/coords>. |
Boyd et al., “Three Dimensional Diagnosis and Orthodontic Treatment of Complex Malocclusions With the Invisalipn Appliance,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):274-293 (Dec. 2001). |
Brandestini et al., “Computer Machined Ceramic Inlays: In Vitro Marginal Adaptation,” J. Dent. Res. Special Issue, Abstract 305, vol. 64, p. 208 (1985). |
Brook et al., “An Image Analysis System for the Determination of Tooth Dimensions from Study Casts: Comparison with Manual Measurements of Mesio-distal Diameter,” J. Dent. Res., 65(3):428-431 (Mar. 1986). |
Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on The Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 1),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(7):442-453 (Jul. 1979). |
Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on The Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 2),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(8):539-551 (Aug. 1979). |
Burstone et al., Precision Adjustment of the Transpalatal Lingual Arch: Computer Arch Form Predetermination, Am, Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 79, No. 2 (Feb. 1981), pp. 115-133. |
Cardinal Industrial Finishes, Powder Coatings information posted at <http://www.cardinalpaint.com> on Aug. 25, 2000, 2 pages. |
Carnaghan, “An Alternative to Holograms for the Portrayal of Human Teeth,” 4th Int'l. Conf. on Holographic Systems, Components and Applications, Sep. 15, 1993, pp. 228-231. |
Chaconas et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station, Part 1, Basic Concepts,” JCO, pp. 360-367 (Jun. 1990). |
Chafetz et al., “Subsidence of the Femoral Prosthesis, A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., No. 201, pp. 60-67 (Dec. 1985). |
Chiappone, (1980). Constructing the Gnathologic Setup and Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 14, pp. 121-133. |
Cottingham, (1969). Gnathologic Clear Plastic Positioner, Am. J. Orthod, vol. 55, pp. 23-31. |
Crawford, “CAD/CAM in the Dental Office: Does It Work?”, Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 121-123 (Feb. 1991). |
Crawford, “Computers in Dentistry: Part 1: CAD/CAM: The Computer Moves Chairside,” “Part 2: F. Duret—A Man With a Vision,” “Part 3: The Computer Gives New Vision—Literally,” “Part 4: Bytes 'N Bites” The Computer Moves From the Front Desk to the Operatory, Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 54(9), pp. 661-666 (1988). |
Crooks, “CAD/CAM Comes to USC,” USC Dentistry, pp. 14-17 (Spring 1990). |
Cureton, Correcting Malaligned Mandibular Incisors with Removable Retainers, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 30, No. 7 (1996) pp. 390-395. |
Curry et al., “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping at the Craniofacial Research Instrumentation Laboratory/University of the Pacific,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):258-265 (Dec. 2001). |
Cutting et al., “Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Design of Craniofacial Surgical Procedures: Optimization and Interaction with Cephalometric and CT-Based Models,” Plast. 77(6):877-885 (Jun. 1986). |
DCS Dental AG, “The CAD/CAM ‘DCS Titan System’ for Production of Crowns/Bridges,” DSC Production, pp. 1-7 (Jan. 1992). |
Definition for gingiva. Dictionary.com p. 1-3. Retrieved from the internet Nov. 5, 2004 <http://reference.com/search/search?q=gingiva>. |
Defranco et al., “Three-Dimensional Large Displacement Analysis of Orthodontic Appliances,” J. Biomechanics, 9:793-801 (1976). |
Dental Institute University of Zurich Switzerland, Program for International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the CEREC-Method, May 1991, 2 pages total. |
Dentrac Corporation, Dentrac document, pp. 4-13 (1992). |
Dent-X posted on Sep. 24, 1998 at <http://www.dent-x.com/DentSim.htm>, 6 pages. |
Doyle, “Digital Dentistry,” Computer Graphics World, pp. 50-52, 54 (Oct. 2000). |
DuraClear™ product information, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab, 1 page (1997). |
Duret et al, “CAD-CAM in Dentistry,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 117:715-720 (Nov. 1988). |
Duret et al., “CAD/CAM Imaging in Dentistry,” Curr. Opin. Dent., 1:150-154 (1991). |
Duret, “The Dental CAD/CAM, General Description of the Project,” Hennson International Product Brochure, 18 pages total, Jan. 1986. |
Duret,“Vers Une Prosthese Informatisee,” (English translation attached), Tonus, vol. 75, pp. 55-57 (Nov. 15, 1985). |
Economides, “The Microcomputer in the Orthodontic Office,” JCO, pp. 767-772 (Nov. 1979). |
Elsasser, Some Observations on the History and Uses of the Kesling Positioner, Am. J. Orthod. (1950) 36:368-374. |
English translation of Japanese Laid-Open Publication No. 63-11148 to inventor T. Ozukuri (Laid-Open on Jan. 18, 1998) pp. 1-7. |
Faber et al., “Computerized Interactive Orthodontic Treatment Planning,” Am. J. Orthod., 73(1):36-46 (Jan. 1978). |
Felton et al., “A Computerized Analysis of the Shape and Stability of Mandibular Arch Form,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(6):478-483 (Dec. 1987). |
Friede et al., “Accuracy of Cephalometric Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery,” Abstract of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:754-760 (1987). |
Futterling et al., “Automated Finite Element Modeling of a Human Mandible with Dental Implants,” JS WSCG '98 —Conference Program, retrieved from the Internet: <http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/papers98/Strasser 98.pdf>, 8 pages. |
Gao et al., “3-D element Generation for Multi-Connected Complex Dental and Mandibular Structure,” Proc. Intl Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality, pp. 267-271 (Jun. 12, 2001). |
Gim-Alldent Deutschland, “Das DUX System: Die Technik,” 2 pages total (2002). |
Gottleib et al., “JCO Interviews Dr. James A. McNamura, Jr., on the Frankel Appliance: Part 2: Clinical 1-1 Management,”J. Clin. Orthod., 16(6):390-407 (Jun. 1982). |
Grayson, “New Methods for Three Dimensional Analysis of Craniofacial Deformity, Symposium: Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxiiofacial Surgery,” AAOMS, 3 pages total, (Sep. 13, 1990). |
Guess et al., “Computer Treatment Estimates in Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery,” JCO, pp. 262-28 (Apr. 1989). |
Heaven et al., “Computer-Based Image Analysis of Artificial Root Surface Caries,” Abstracts of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:528 (Apr. 17-21, 1991). |
Highbeam Research, “Simulating Stress Put on Jaw,” Tooling & Production [online], Nov. 1996, n pp. 1-2, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL http://static.highbeam.com/t/toolingampproduction/november011996/simulatingstressputonfa . . . >. |
Hikage, “Integrated Orthodontic Management System for Virtual Three-Dimensional Computer Graphic Simulation and Optical Video Image Database for Diagnosis and Treatment Planning”, Journal of Japan Orthodontic Society, Feb. 1987, English translation, pp. 1-38, Japanese version, 46(2), pp. 248-269 (60 pages total). |
Hoffmann, et al., “Role of Cephalometry for Planning of Jaw Orthopedics and Jaw Surgery Procedures,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), lnformatbnen, pp. 375-396 (Mar. 1991). |
Hojjatie et al., “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Glass-Ceramic Dental Crowns,” J. Biomech., 23(11):1157-1166 (1990). |
Huckins, “CAD-CAM Generated Mandibular Model Prototype from MRI Data,” AAOMS, p. 96 (1999). |
Important Tip About Wearing the Red White & Blue Active Clear Retainer System, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab, 1 page 1998). |
JCO Interviews, Craig Andreiko , DDS, MS on the Elan and Orthos Systems, JCO, pp. 459-468 (Aug. 1994). |
JCO Interviews, Dr. Homer W. Phillips on Computers in Orthodontic Practice, Part 2, JCO. 1997; 1983:819-831. |
Jerrold, “The Problem, Electronic Data Transmission and the Law,” AJO-DO, pp. 478-479 (Apr. 1988). |
Jones et al., “An Assessment of the Fit of a Parabolic Curve to Pre- and Post-Treatment Dental Arches,” Br. J. Orthod., 16:85-93 (1989). |
Kamada et.al., Case Reports on Tooth Positioners Using LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1984) 26(1): 11-29. |
Kamada et.al., Construction of Tooth Positioners with LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber and Some Case KJ Reports, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1982) 24(1):1-27. |
Kanazawa et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurements of the Occlusal Surfaces of Upper Molars in a Dutch Population,” J. Dent Res., 63(11):1298-1301 (Nov. 1984). |
Kesling et al., The Philosophy of the Tooth Positioning Appliance, American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral surgery. 1945; 31:297-304. |
Kesling, Coordinating the Predetermined Pattern and Tooth Positioner with Conventional Treatment, Am. J. Orthod. Oral Surg. (1946) 32:285-293. |
Kleeman et al., The Speed Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod. (1996) 30:673-680. |
Kochanek, “Interpolating Splines with Local Tension, Continuity and Bias Control,” Computer Graphics, ri 18(3):33-41 (Jul. 1984). KM Oral Surgery (1945) 31 :297-30. |
Kunii et al., “Articulation Simulation for an Intelligent Dental Care System,” Displays 15:181-188 (1994). |
Kuroda et al., Three-Dimensional Dental Cast Analyzing System Using Laser Scanning, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. (1996) 110:365-369. |
Laurendeau, et al., “A Computer-Vision Technique for the Acquisition and Processing of 3-D Profiles of 7 Dental Imprints: An Application in Orthodontics,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 10(3):453-461 (Sep. 1991). |
Leinfelder, et al., “A New Method for Generating Ceramic Restorations: a CAD-CAM System,” J. Am. 1-1 Dent. Assoc., 118(6):703-707 (Jun. 1989). |
Manetti, et al., “Computer-Aided Cefalometry and New Mechanics in Orthodontics,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), Fortschr Kieferorthop. 44, 370-376 (Nr. 5), 1983. |
McCann, “Inside the ADA,” J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 118:286-294 (Mar. 1989). |
McNamara et al., “Invisible Retainers,” J. Cfin. Orthod., pp. 570-578 (Aug. 1985). |
McNamara et al., Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the Mixed Dentition, Needham Press, pp. 347-353 (Jan. 1993). |
Moermann et al., “Computer Machined Adhesive Porcelain Inlays: Margin Adaptation after Fatigue Stress,” IADR Abstract 339, J. Dent. Res., 66(a):763 (1987). |
Moles, “Correcting Mild Malalignments—As Easy As One, Two, Three,” AOA/Pro Corner, vol. 11, No. 1, 2 pages (2002). |
Mormann et al., “Marginale Adaptation von adhasuven Porzellaninlays in vitro,”Separatdruck aus:Schweiz. Mschr. Zahnmed. 95: 1118-1129, 1985. |
Nahoum, “The Vacuum Formed Dental Contour Appliance,” N. Y. State Dent. J., 30(9):385-390 (Nov. 1964). |
Nash, “CEREC CAD/CAM Inlays: Aesthetics and Durability in a Single Appointment,” Dent. Today, 9(8):20, 22-23 (Oct. 1990). |
Nishiyama et al., “A New Construction of Tooth Repositioner by LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber,” J. Nihon Univ. Sch. Dent., 19(2):93-102 (1977). |
Paul et al., “Digital Documentation of Individual Human Jaw and Tooth Forms for Applications in Orthodontics, Oral Surgery and Forensic Medicine” Proc. of the 24th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON '98), Sep. 4, 1998, pp. 2415-2418. |
Pinkham, “Foolish Concept Propels Technology,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Jan./Feb. 1989. |
Pinkham, “Inventor's CAD/CAM May Transform Dentistry,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Sep. 1990. |
Ponitz, “Invisible Retainers,” Am. J. Orthod., 59(3):266-272 (Mar. 1971). |
Procera Research Projects, “Procera Research Projects 1993—Abstract Collection,” pp. 3-7, 28 (1993). |
Proffit et al., Contemporary Orthodontics, (Second Ed.), Chapter 15, Mosby Inc., pp. 470-533 (Oct. 1993). |
Raintree Essix & ARS Materials, Inc., Raintree Essix, Technical Magazine Table of contents and Essix Appliances, <http://www.essix.com/magazine/defaulthtml> Aug. 13, 1997. |
Redmond et al., “Clinical Implications of Digital Orthodontics,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 117(2):240-242 (2000). |
Rekow et al., “CAD/CAM for Dental Restorations—Some of the Curious Challenges,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 38(4):314-318 (Apr. 1991). |
Rekow et al., “Comparison of Three Data Acquisition Techniques for 3-D Tooth Surface Mapping,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 13(1):344-345 1991. |
Rekow, “A Review of the Developments in Dental CAD/CAM Systems,” (contains references to Japanese efforts and content of the papers of particular interest to the clinician are indicated with a one line summary of their content in the bibliography), Curr. Opin. Dent., 2:25-33 (Jun. 1992). |
Rekow, “CAD/CAM in Dentistry: A Historical Perspective and View of the Future,” J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 58(4):283, 287-288 (Apr. 1992). |
Rekow, “Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Dentistry: A Review of the State of the Art,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 58(4):512-516 (Oct. 1987). |
Rekow, “Dental CAD-CAM Systems: What is the State of the Art?”, J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 122:43-48 1991. |
Rekow, “Feasibility of an Automated System for Production of Dental Restorations, Ph.D. Thesis,” Univ. of Minnesota, 244 pages total, Nov. 1988. |
Richmond et al., “The Development of a 3D Cast Analysis System,” Br. J. Orthod., 13(1):53-54 (Jan. 1986). |
Richmond et al., “The Development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): Reliability and Validity,” Eur. J. Orthod., 14:125-139 (1992). |
Richmond, “Recording The Dental Cast in Three Dimensions,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(3):199-206 (Sep. 1987). |
Rudge, “Dental Arch Analysis: Arch Form, A Review of the Literature,” Eur. J. Orthod., 3(4):279-284 1981. |
Sakuda et al., “Integrated Information-Processing System in Clinical Orthodontics: An Approach with Use of a Computer Network System,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 101(3): 210-220 (Mar. 1992). |
Schellhas et al., “Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Surgical Planning,” Arch. Otolamp! . Head Neck Surg., 114:438-442 (Apr. 1988). |
Schroeder et al., Eds. The Visual Toolkit, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey (1998) Chapters 6, 8 & 9, (pp. 153-210,309-354, and 355-428, respectively). |
Shilliday, (1971). Minimizing finishing problems with the mini-positioner, Am. J. Orthod. 59:596-599. |
Siemens, “CEREC—Computer-Reconstruction,” High Tech in der Zahnmedizin, 14 pages total (2004). |
Sinclair, “The Readers' Corner,” J. Clin. Orthod., 26(6):369-372 (Jun. 1992). |
Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, CEREC 3D, Manuel utiiisateur, Version 2.0X (in French), 2003,114 pages total. |
Stoll et al., “Computer-aided Technologies in Dentistry,” (article summary in English, article in German), Dtsch Zahna'rztl Z 45, pp. 314-322 (1990). |
Sturman, “Interactive Keyframe Animation of 3-D Articulated Models,”Proceedings Graphics Interface '84, May-Jun. 1984, pp. 35-40. |
The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for doctors. http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/doctorhtml>, 5 pages (May 19, 2003). |
The Choice is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for patients, <http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/patients.html>, 2 pages (May 19, 2003). |
The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information, 6 pages (2003). |
The Red, White & Blue Way to Improve Your Smile!Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages 1992. |
Truax L., “Truax Clasp-Less(TM) Appliance System,” Funct. Orthod., 9(5):22-4, 26-8 (Sep.-Oct. 1992). |
Tru-Tain Orthodontic & Dental Supplies, Product Brochure, Rochester, Minnesota 55902, 16 pages total (1996). |
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Automated Crown Replication Using Solid Photography SM,” Solid Photography Inc., Melville NY, Oct. 1977, 20 pages total. |
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Holodontography: An Introduction to Dental Laser Holography,” School of Aerospace Medicine Brooks AFB Tex, Mar. 1973, 37 pages total. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/050,342, filed Jun. 20, 1997, 41 pages total. |
Van Der Linden et al., “Three-Dimensional Analysis of Dental Casts by Means of the Optocom,” J. Dent. Res., p. 1100 (Jul.-Aug. 1972). |
Van Der Linden, “A New Method to Determine Tooth Positions and Dental Arch Dimensions,” J. Dent. Res., 51(4):1104 (Jul.-Aug. 1972). |
Van Der Zel, “Ceramic-Fused-to-Metal Restorations with a New CAD/CAM System,” Quintessence Int., 24(11):769-778 (1993). |
Varady et al., “Reverse Engineering of Geometric Models—An Introduction,” Computer-Aided Design, 29(4):255-268,1997. |
Verstreken et al., “An Image-Guided Planning System for Endosseous Oral Implants,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 17(5):842-852 (Oct. 1998). |
Warunek et al., Physical and Mechanical Properties of Elastomers in Orthodonic Positioners, Am J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop, vol. 95, No. 5, (May 1989) pp. 399-400. |
Warunek et.al., Clinical Use of Silicone Elastomer Applicances, JCO (1989) XXIII(10):694-700. |
Wells, Application of the Positioner Appliance in Orthodontic Treatment, Am. J. Orthodont. (1970) 58:351-366. |
Williams, “Dentistry and CAD/CAM: Another French Revolution,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 2-5 (Jan./Mar. 1987). |
Williams, “The Switzerland and Minnesota Developments in CAD/CAM,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 50-55 (Apr./Jun. 1987). |
Wishan, “New Advances in Personal Computer Applications for Cephalometric Analysis, Growth Prediction, Surgical Treatment Planning and Imaging Processing,”Symposium: Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxilofacial Surgery Presented on Sep. 13, 1990. |
WSCG'98 —Conference Program, “The Sixth International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization '98,” Feb. 9-13, 1998, pp. 1-7, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL<http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/wscg98.h>. |
Xia et al., “Three-Dimensional Virtual-Reality Surgical Planning and Soft-Tissue Prediction for Orthognathic Surgery,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., 5(2):97-107 (Jun. 2001). |
Yamamoto et al., “Optical Measurement of Dental Cast Profile and Application to Analysis of Three-Dimensional Tooth Movement in Orthodontics,” Front. Med. Biol. Eng., 1(2):119-130 (1988). |
Yamamoto et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurement of Dental Cast Profiles and Its Applications to Orthodontics,” Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 12(5):2051-2053 (1990). |
Yamany et al., “A System for Human Jaw Modeling Using Intra-Oral Images,” Proc. of the 20th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Nov. 1, 1998, vol. 2, pp. 563-566. |
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); I. The D.P. Concept and Implementation of Transparent Silicone Resin (Orthocon),” Nippon Dental Review, 452:61-74 (Jun. 1980). |
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); II. The D.P. Manufacturing Procedure and Clinical Applications,” Nippon Dental Review, 454:107-130 (Aug. 1980). |
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); Ill.—The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 2. Skeletal Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 458:112-129 (Dec. 1980). |
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); Ill. The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 1, Dental and Functional Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 457:146-164 (Nov. 1980). |
You May Be a Candidate for This Invisible No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages (2002). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140315145 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61193867 | Dec 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13737801 | Jan 2013 | US |
Child | 14321482 | US | |
Parent | 12654735 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13737801 | US |