This invention relates generally to dental prosthesis and more specifically to dental implants.
The invention relates to a dental implant having a first implant part provided for being inserted into a jawbone and a second implant part associated therewith, provided for fixing a dental prosthesis, the implant parts being mechanically connectable to each other via a connection pin or contact pin which is formed onto one of the implant parts and which can be pushed into a receiving channel or a profiled recess provided in the other implant part.
Such dental implants, so-called two-part or multi-part implants, are known in many different forms. They are usually inserted into the jawbone in the place of an extracted or shed tooth, in order to hold there, after a healing-in phase of three to four months, a prosthetic part serving as a dental prosthesis or a crown. For this purpose, such a dental implant is usually configured as an appropriately shaped metallic body, the first implant part, as a rule also called post part, being usually inserted into the jawbone by screwing-in, in the intended place. As a rule, the post part includes at its apical end a screw thread, in most cases a self-cutting thread, with which the post part is inserted into the correspondingly prepared implant bed.
Such a dental implant is usually made up in general of two parts, comprising the post part provided for insertion into the jawbone and an associated superstructure part, on which the dental prosthesis provided as a prosthesis or the like can be fastened. The post part as well as the head part or superstructure part usually consist of metal or of a ceramic, in particular of titanium, a titanium alloy, an alloy containing titanium, a zirconium oxide/aluminium oxide ceramic or a ceramic containing the either zirconium oxide or aluminium oxide. The outer surface of the post part is usually provided with a thread, which can be designed as a self-cutting or else as a not self-cutting thread. The post part is usually anchored in a correspondingly prepared implant bed of the jawbone. The construction of the thread provided in the external area of the post part is usually configured for a high primary stability of the arrangement and a uniform forwarding of the forces arising under the chewing load of the dental implant, into the jawbone.
Dental implants (post parts) usually have an external thread (
In the past, dental post parts were usually covered with soft tissue after their insertion or were at least not treated prosthetically. The reason for this was the better healing success. In the most recent past, the external threads of dental post parts have been modified to achieve a better anchoring between the post part and the jawbone. The better anchoring quality allows to prosthetically treat and load dental implants earlier or even directly after their insertion. It turned out, however, that in this case, the torque required for screwing in increased. The maximally possible torques are higher than 50 Ncm. As a consequence thereof, it is possible that through an excessively high screw-in torque the indexing in the post part is damaged. Mostly, the treating person does not notice that immediately. In such a case, the consequences may be dramatic. It is possible that an implant whose indexing is damaged cannot be treated prosthetically. As a consequence, it might be necessary to mill the post part out of the bone. The invention is based on the task to avoid this.
Pre-assembled screw-in posts have advantages, but also shortcomings, as compared with screw-in instruments engaging directly into the post part. As advantages of the pre-assembled screw-in superstructure part, it can be mentioned that the connection with the post part is secured with a screw and that the treating person does not have to introduce the instrument into the post part. As advantages of the direct engagement of the instrument, it can be mentioned that the omission of the screw-in superstructure part and the connection screw leads to an enormous cost reduction and that the screw-in instrument does not have to be disassembled after insertion of the post part. It is a disadvantage of the direct instrument engagement that the risk of damaging the indexing, via which the screw-in torque is transmitted, is higher than it is with a pre-assembled screw-in superstructure part. In addition, connection techniques between superstructure parts and post parts exist in which the profiled recess formed in the post part, serving as indexing, is not suited to be directly engaged by a screw-in instrument.
Oval cone connections and conical connections in which the conical part is not round are not suitable for direct engagement with a screw-in instrument, because the transmission of a torque also generates a force pressing the components (post part and screw-in superstructure part) apart. This means that the torque transmission may loosen the connection itself and/or that a jamming between the implant and the screw-in instrument may occur. This effect would complicate the handling and the dealing with such a system.
If the screw-in superstructure part is already pre-assembled, the connection screw will prevent the loosening of the connection.
If the screw-in instrument loosens during screwing in, due to the torque, this may also be a reason for damage to the indexing.
The invention is based on the problem to provide a dental implant of the above-mentioned type, with which a smooth and functional rotational self-centering, working merely through tightening of the connection screw, can be achieved.
This problem is solved according to the invention by the fact that the connection pin or contact pin and, adapted thereto, the receiving channel associated with it or the profiled recess, include in each case in an indexing area, in the manner of a conical design, a plurality of contact surfaces inclined to the longitudinal axis of the first implant part, at least one of the contact surfaces being provided on at least one implant part with a friction-reducing coating.
Consequently, the friction between the contact surfaces of the superstructure part, of the post part and/or the connection screw is reduced by a coating or surface modification of at least one contact surface, in order to avoid a rotationally inhibiting effect during assembly. It would also be possible to apply slip agents, but this has to be considered as doubtful for clinical reasons. Mechanical, chemical and/or electrochemical polishing is another approach to the problem, but has turned out in corresponding internal test series as possibly being not always sufficient.
For a dental implant in which an unround conical part is used, in particular for the indexing, the risk of damaging the indexing, on the one hand, and the loosening and jamming, on the other hand, can be prevented in a particularly advantageous development by fixing a second locking mechanism below the unround cone part. Preferably, this locking mechanism serves exclusively or mainly for transmitting the torque and not for indexing for prosthetic applications at a later date. Preferably, this locking mechanism is not conical, in order to prevent the self-loosening effect. Should the screwing-in process lead to a damage of the locking mechanism, this will not influence the prosthetic treatment of the post part.
Before incorporating the dental prosthesis on multi-part dental implants, the superstructure parts are fastened or fixed in or on the post part osseointegrated/anchored in the jawbone. This fastening is in most cases effected by screwing, deadlocking (e.g. conical self-inhibition) and/or gluing. Most connections between the superstructure part and the post part have a more or less precise positioning in vertical, horizontal and rotational orientation. With regard to the rotational orientation, there is usually no definite positioning. This mostly indefinite or multiple positioning is called indexing. The number of indexings or positioning possibilities of the superstructure part on the post part mostly lies between two and twelve, preferably between two and six, and indexings in which the number of positionings lies between two and four have in particular proved successful. The more positioning possibilities exist, the more difficult it is for the dentist to find the correct position upon the first attempt to incorporate the superstructure part in the post part. Usually, the post part and the superstructure part form a rotational locking mechanism via this indexing in the assembled condition. These rotational locking mechanisms have in most cases parallel walls. That means that in the rotational locking mechanism the parts provided for the locking mechanism are not conical, with the consequence that in case of a rotational load, caused e.g. by a torque around the axis of the superstructure part, which is exerted upon the superstructure part, the torque is directly forwarded onto the post part via the frictional connection or the moment connection and thus, consequently, via the geometry of the locking mechanism. A pure moment load, which is transmitted onto the superstructure part, leads to a pure moment load upon the post part, too.
When the superstructure part is incorporated in or on the post part, the correct rotational position has to be found prior to the final seating. If the connection is, for example, a hexagon, the superstructure part is rotated until it is in the rotationally exact position and then the superstructure part can plunge into the post part or vice versa. The plunging of the components into each other is a purely translatory movement. A rotation during plunging or in the plunged condition will at most take place within the framework of the work tolerances.
As soon as a final assembly is effected between the superstructure part and the post part by means of a connection screw, an inhibition additionally exists between the two components. This inhibition is effected by the static friction caused by the contact pressure force between the post part and the superstructure part, exerted by the connection screw. If the interface between the post part and the superstructure part is conical, this static friction will increase mainly as a function of the cone angle, and even a self-inhibition may arise.
There are connection types in which the walls of the indexing or the rotational locking mechanism are not parallel.
The common feature of the types of connection between the superstructure part and the post part of
These conical parts of the rotational locking mechanism or these conical rotational locking mechanisms are, strictly speaking, no pure rotational locking mechanisms, because, when a moment which is applied on the superstructure part and directed around the latter's axis is transmitted, no pure moment is forwarded to the post part. Between the superstructure part and the post part, a torque and a force directed such that the superstructure part and the post part push off from each other are effective. The amount of this force depends on the geometry of the connection and on the properties of static and sliding friction of the connection partners at the mutual contact points. When the connection between the post part and the superstructure part is in its final assembled condition, i.e. with assembled connection screw, this effect as a function of the geometrical shape has hardly any influence. The smaller the cone angle is and the higher the static and sliding friction is, the lower is the force pushing the components apart. The larger the cone angle is and the lower the static and sliding friction is, the higher is the part of the force pushing the components apart.
This pushing apart influences the practical application of dental implants in various ways. Insertion of a post part into the bone is effected via a rotation because the external geometry of the post parts usually includes a thread by means of which the post part is anchored in the bone. The post part is screwed in by means of a screw-in tool. This tool engages either directly into the rotational locking mechanism/the indexing for transmission of the required torque or via a screw-in superstructure part pre-assembled on the post part. This screw-in superstructure part is in most cases fastened on the post part by means of a connection screw and uses the indexing as a rotational locking mechanism for transmission of the torque required for screwing in. In the direction of the screw-in tool, there is in most cases another rotational locking mechanism. If the connection between the post part and the superstructure part of a dental implant is a rotational locking mechanism with conical parts, the post part can probably be inserted without problems using a screw-in superstructure part pre-assembled by means of a connection screw. As these screw-in superstructure parts and the connection screws associated therewith will be disassembled after the insertion of the post part into the bone and can then not be reused any more, additional costs arise and superfluous disassembly processes take place. If it is possible to engage the screw-in tool directly into the post part, costs for the patient and work on the patient can be omitted. This is an enormous advantage, but is difficult with a connection possessing conical or inclined functional elements in the indexing. The higher the static and sliding friction between the contact surfaces of the superstructure part and the post part is, the lower is the force pushing the components apart and the lower is the risk of a complication during screwing in of the post part into the bone using a screw-in tool which engages directly into the post part and which engages via a conical indexing.
The designs of the connection between the superstructure part and the post part of a dental implant as shown in
Tests with conical self-centering indexings have shown that the smaller the cone angle is, the higher is the probability of a conical self-inhibition between the superstructure part and the post part. This self-inhibition is, in fact, desired, but only in the final position of the superstructure part in or on the post part. If an inhibition takes place between the two components before the rotational final position is reached, e.g. due to the fact that the superstructure part would have to self-center contrary to the direction of rotation of the connection screw, the simplification desired with the self-centering will not be achieved. It turned out that, contrary to conventional indexings incorrectly assembled, the inhibition loosens by shaking the superstructure part and is, therefore, quickly noticed, and that then, the superstructure part continues to center, but this configuration is not yet satisfactory.
Connections as shown in
The choice and configuration of the connection parameters (e.g. roof angle, cone angle, eccentricity of oval cone connections, differences in diameters, local maxima and local minima, etc.) have a great influence on the quality of the self-centering. Through these parameters, the transmission ratios of the transformation of a translatory movement into a rotational movement or vice versa can be set or defined. Similar to gearing mechanisms, the friction between the contact surfaces of the movable partners, in this case, the superstructure part and the post part, has great influence on the smooth running. There is the risk that in case of excessive friction between the superstructure part, the post part and/or the connection screw, the superstructure part jams with the post part or, due to the further increasing axial force via an inhibition, no rotation takes place between the superstructure part and the post part. Therefore, the friction between the contact points of the superstructure part and the post part has great influence on the smooth running and reliability of the self-centering. Furthermore, the friction between the connection screw and the post part (via the thread), but in particular the friction between the connection screw and the superstructure part (via the screw seat) has great influence on the smooth running of the rotational self-centering.
The static friction and the sliding friction of the following contact points have an influence on the functionality of the rotational self-centering.
1. The contact surfaces of the conical indexing of the superstructure part and the post part.
2. The contact surfaces between the connection screw and the superstructure part, i.e. the screw seat in the superstructure part and the screw seat on the head of the connection screw.
Influencing the properties of the static and sliding friction of the surfaces described in paragraphs 1. and 2. above has a decisive influence on the functionality of the rotational self-centering.
There are different degrees of difficulty for inserting superstructure parts into the patient's mouth. If a superstructure part has to be inserted in the area of the front teeth, this area is in most cases easy to access. If, however, a superstructure part has to be inserted in the area of the lateral teeth, this will be more difficult, because this area is difficult to access and is more strongly influenced, e.g. through the ability to open one's mouth, than the area of the front teeth. It happens quite frequently that superstructure parts are inserted and are not in the correct rotational position at the first attempt. It may also happen, in particular with conical connection types between the superstructure part and the post part, in which an indexing is applied apically of the cone surfaces, that the connection screw grips in the post part, although the rotational position is not correct and before the rotational locking mechanism of the indexing engages. That means that the superstructure part has not been inserted in its final position (and is consequently seated too high) and the connection screw can, nevertheless, be screwed in. In most cases, the treating dentist will not notice this until he tries to seat the dental prosthesis. Another problem is the fact that thereby, areas of the superstructure part or of the post part might be damaged. It would, therefore, be a considerable optimation if the superstructure part would automatically center, with regard to the rotational orientation, as soon as the connection screw grips in the post part.
The following surface modifications have shown a positive effect on the smooth running: simple anodizing (electrochemical generation of an oxide layer), titanium nitriding or titanium-nitride coating, chromium-nitride coating, anodizing type II, and DLC (Diamond-Like Carbon or Diamond-Like Coating) (monocrystalline and/or polycrystalline carbon/diamond coating). Through these processes, the friction between the connection partners can be reduced so far (even if not all contact surfaces are coated) that in the different connection types, a rotational self-centering by tightening the connection screw was fully given, using the clinically and mechanically reasonable parameters.
It is of great importance that the adhesion and friction-modifying modification or coating is tissue-compatible and does not irritate the hard tissue and/or soft tissue.
The coating of the contact surfaces between the superstructure part and the post part and the coating of the screw seat in the superstructure part and the screw seat on the connection screw had the greatest influence. It could, however, be observed that the coating of only one surface has already a positive influence. The coating of the screw seat on the connection screw or of the contact surface of the superstructure part in the direction of the post part alone improved the smooth running considerably.
Tests have shown that the reduction of the contact surfaces of the predominantly conical functional surfaces of the indexing led to an extraordinary success in internal connections between the post part and the superstructure part. Internal connections are characterized in that a profiled recess is formed in the post part, into which a contact pin formed onto the superstructure part engages (
When comparing the desired properties of indexings with conical functional surfaces and rotational self-centering with regard to the insertion to a screw-in tool directly engaging into the post part and with regard to the quality of the self-centering, one will notice that the favoring properties of sliding and static friction work in opposite directions. The described invention counteracts the insertion by means of a screw-in tool directly engaging into the post part.
The invention should solve this difficulty, too. The problem is solve according to the invention by separating the rotational locking mechanism with the function of indexing the superstructure part in the post part from the function of the screw-in process, by installing, below the indexing with a rotational self-centering, in the post part another indexing 18, which has parallel walls and does not generate a force pushing the components apart under rotational load. This second indexing 18 is used exclusively for inserting the post part into the jawbone. Therefore, any damage occurring will not affect the later function between the superstructure part and the post part. Type and geometry of the additional rotational locking mechanism in the post part can be manifold. In a particularly advantageous embodiment, the number of usable positions of the profiled recess used for indexing is identical with the number of possible rotational positions in the rotational locking mechanism used for the insertion. The advantage consists in that during the insertion, the treating person can recognize by the screw-in tool where the positioning possibilities of a superstructure part are, if the screw-in tool is provided with corresponding markings.
The lower the number of positioning possibilities of the superstructure part on the post part is, the more important is it that the treating dentist knows in which way the indexing/the rotational locking mechanism is oriented in the jawbone. Consequently, it is very important that the number of positioning possibilities of the index provided with the functional surfaces inclined to the axis of the post part or to the axis of the superstructure part, which serves for indexing the superstructure part, and of the index provided with functional surfaces oriented in parallel to the axis of the post part or to the axis of the superstructure part, which serves for screwing in the post part, is identical. In this way, it is possible to place on the screw-in instrument and/or on the screw-in superstructure part markings by means of which the treating person can recognize the rotational orientation of the indexing or of the rotational locking mechanism.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102010019582.0 | May 2010 | DE | national |
102010019583.9 | May 2010 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/696,162, having a filing date of Jan. 14, 2013, which is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of PCT Application No. PCT/EP2011/002229, having an international filing date of May 5, 2011, which designated the United States, which PCT application claimed the benefit of German Application Serial No. 10 2010 019 583.9, filed on May 5, 2010 and German Application Serial Number 10 2010 019 582.0, filed on May 5, 2010, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4270905 | Mohammed | Jun 1981 | A |
4324550 | Reuther et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4731085 | Koch | Mar 1988 | A |
4793808 | Kirsch | Dec 1988 | A |
4832601 | Linden | May 1989 | A |
4850870 | Lazzara et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4854872 | Detsch | Aug 1989 | A |
4876148 | Virkar et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4955811 | Lazzara et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5015186 | Detsch | May 1991 | A |
5116225 | Riera | May 1992 | A |
5125971 | Nonami et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5135395 | Marlin | Aug 1992 | A |
5195892 | Gersberg | Mar 1993 | A |
5246370 | Coatman | Sep 1993 | A |
5281140 | Niznick | Jan 1994 | A |
5302126 | Wimmer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5336465 | Matsunaga et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344457 | Pilliar et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350302 | Marlin et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5407359 | Balfour et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5425639 | Anders et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437551 | Chalifoux | Aug 1995 | A |
5527182 | Willoughby | Jun 1996 | A |
5547377 | Daftary | Aug 1996 | A |
5553983 | Shinjo | Sep 1996 | A |
5571015 | Siegmund | Nov 1996 | A |
5674072 | Moser et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674073 | Ingber et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5759035 | Ricci | Jun 1998 | A |
5766179 | Faccioli et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782918 | Klardie et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785525 | Weissman | Jul 1998 | A |
5947733 | Sutter et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954505 | Ford | Sep 1999 | A |
5984680 | Rogers | Nov 1999 | A |
5989026 | Rogers et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6012923 | Bassett et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6158310 | Goss et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168436 | O'Brien | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6217331 | Rogers et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6319000 | Branemark | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6419489 | Jorneus et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431866 | Hurson et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6500003 | Nichinonni | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6537069 | Simmons, Jr. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6575057 | Ploeger | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6652765 | Beaty | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6726480 | Sutter | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6994547 | Sethi et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7144622 | Stecher et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7225710 | Pacheco, Jr. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249949 | Carter | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7309231 | Engman | Dec 2007 | B2 |
8033826 | Towse et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8123524 | Anitua | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8291795 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8347761 | Goss et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8932663 | Ritz et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9364299 | Marlin et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9393086 | Zipprich | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20020102517 | Poirier | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127515 | Gittleman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020177105 | Engman | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020192620 | Jorneus et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030013068 | Gittleman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030194679 | Odrich et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030224328 | Sapian | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232309 | Dinkelacker et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040038179 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040101807 | Porter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040121285 | Wu | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040121286 | Aravena | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040185417 | Rassoli | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185419 | Schulter et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040209226 | Rogers et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050042573 | Lustig et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050166724 | Castaneda | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186537 | Gersberg | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060110706 | Jorneus et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060121417 | Scommegna et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141418 | Heo | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060172257 | Niznick | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060263747 | Hurson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070037121 | Carter | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080182227 | Wolf | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080241789 | Mundorf | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080241792 | Rossler et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261176 | Hurson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261178 | Homann et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080289455 | Goss | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080293015 | Wong et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090035722 | Balasundaram | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090075236 | Towse | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090123889 | Mehrhof | May 2009 | A1 |
20090123890 | Purga et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090123891 | Rosenberg et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090239195 | Wohrle et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090305190 | Zipprich | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100099058 | Wang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100112527 | Chapel | May 2010 | A1 |
20100178636 | Stephan et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100196851 | Konig | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100196852 | Baruc et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100240009 | Gogarnoiu | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100304334 | Layton | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110065064 | Kahdemann et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110123951 | Lomicka et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110212417 | Beekman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223562 | Zipprich | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110311947 | Schoene et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120141951 | Bellanca et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164599 | Holmstrom et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120288824 | Nordin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296613 | Kirchner et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130108984 | Zipprich | May 2013 | A1 |
20130337410 | Ten Bruggenkate | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140106305 | Jacoby et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140134570 | Zipprich et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150037759 | Zipprich | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150157427 | Purga et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160296302 | Ziprich | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170165033 | Zipprich | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
696625 | Aug 2007 | CH |
2216818 | Jan 1996 | CN |
1889896 | Jan 2007 | CN |
101146491 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101188982 | May 2008 | CN |
101252891 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101878003 | Nov 2010 | CN |
102202598 | Sep 2011 | CN |
19959366 | Jun 2001 | DE |
10340059 | Feb 2005 | DE |
69636845 | Aug 2007 | DE |
102006036020 | Feb 2008 | DE |
102008054138 | May 2010 | DE |
0015599 | Sep 1980 | EP |
1062916 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1547543 | Jun 2005 | EP |
2039320 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2790659 | Sep 2000 | FR |
10-2007-0009060 | Jan 2007 | KR |
WO 9743977 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9846162 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9952466 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 200226154 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 2004008983 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004073541 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004080328 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2006109176 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2008011948 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2009121500 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2010049135 | May 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Peltier, FR 2790659 A1, Machine translation of specification, Sep. 2000 (Year: 2000). |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/003,917, dated Jan. 31, 2017 8 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,162, dated May 3, 2017 11 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/885,643, dated Feb. 21, 2017 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/885,643, dated May 19, 2017 7 pages. |
Extended Search Report for European Patent Application No. 16191828.9, dated Feb. 8, 2017, 11 pages. |
Official Action for Canada Patent Application No. 2,813,625, dated Mar. 9, 2017, 4 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,570, dated Jun. 21, 2017 12 pages. |
Official Action with English Translation for China Patent Application No. 201280012017.8, dated Nov. 29, 2016, 12 pages. |
International Search Report prepared by the European Patent Office dated Jul. 31, 2007, for International Application No. PCT/EP2007/003480; Applicant, Holger Zipprich. |
Written Opinion for International (PCT) Application No. PCT/EP2007/003480, dated Apr. 20, 2007. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability prepared by the International Preliminary Examining Authority for International Application No. PCT/EP2007/003480 and English translation. |
International Search Report prepared by the European Patent Office dated Aug. 18, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/EP2011/002229. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion prepared by the European Patent Office dated Mar. 14, 2012, for International Application No. PCT/EP2011/005748. |
International Search Report prepared by the European Patent Office dated May 14, 2012, for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/000413. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/003,917, dated Jun. 30, 2014 8 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/003,917, dated Jan. 15, 2015 8 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/003,917, dated Mar. 29, 2016 8 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/003,917, dated Oct. 7, 2016 7 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,570 dated Apr. 11, 2011, 15 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,570 dated Jan. 5, 2012, 9 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,570 dated Jan. 3, 2013, 18 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,570 dated May 31, 2013, 18 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,570, dated Mar. 22, 2016 15 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,570, dated Oct. 26, 2016 14 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,162 dated Apr. 12, 2013, 15 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,162 dated Feb. 24, 2014, 15 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,162 dated Jul. 18, 2014, 20 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,162, dated May 6, 2015 12 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,162, dated Nov. 20, 2015 13 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,162, dated Jun. 3, 2016 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,162, dated Sep. 2, 2016 5 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/885,643, dated Apr. 9, 2015 18 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/885,643, dated Dec. 17, 2015 24 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/885,643, dated Aug. 11, 2016 31 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/982,799, dated Jul. 30, 2014, 11 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/982,799, dated Mar. 3, 2015 7 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/982,799, dated Oct. 8, 2015 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/982,799, dated Mar. 15, 2016 6 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,570, dated Dec. 29, 2017 15 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,570, dated Jun. 20, 2018 14 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/444,031, dated Jul. 3, 2018 12 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,162, dated Dec. 12, 2017 15 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,162, dated Sep. 7, 2018 14 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,931, dated Jan. 16, 2018 8 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,931, dated Sep. 20, 2018 8 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,570, dated Feb. 21, 2019 12 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/444,031, dated Mar. 7, 2019 16 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,931, dated Apr. 4, 2019 5 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,570, dated Aug. 20, 2019 9 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/444,031, dated Oct. 25, 2019 13 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,162, dated May 2, 2019 16 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,162, dated Oct. 4, 2019 27 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,931, dated Sep. 11, 2019 5 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,570, dated Apr. 30, 2020 12 pages. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/444,031, dated May 29, 2020 14 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170086951 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13696162 | US | |
Child | 15374548 | US |