The present invention concerns a dental instrument for the extraction of an object, notably a broken dental instrument, from a root canal.
Root canal treatments, called endodontic treatments, are conducted more and more frequently by a mechanized instrument. For several years, dentists made use of a series of manual files, preferably of stainless steel, that they used by alternating rotating movements with axial movements. Today, the tendency is to use a succession of nickel-titanium rotating files according to a defined sequence. This technique permits cleaning the root canal while respecting the trajectory of the original canal, in a minimal time and while respecting the basic principles of endodonty. The safety of use of these instruments depends greatly on the clinical case, the training of the dentist and, of course, on the conditions of use. This last point is important for the instrument manufacturer. The conditions of use are linked to the pressure exerted in the canal as well as the size, the rotational speed and the usage time of the instrument. Endodontic treatments are not always conducted in straight canals. There are cases where there is great curvature of the canal trajectory and other cases where access is difficult. Finally, some canals have calcifications. All these difficulties can induce instrument breakage. Good dental practice requires the dentist to remove these broken instruments.
Several techniques have been proposed to remove tips of broken instruments from a dental root canal. Notably from the documents G 92 03 692.9 and DE 100 23 195, extraction instruments are known, which comprise a shaft terminated by a clamp permitting seizing a broken instrument in a dental root canal. The clamp is made up of elastic arms that can be positioned and held in a position of clamping the broken instrument by a restraining system consisting of a handle that moves relative to the shaft and that, when it is moved in a given direction, exerts a pressure on the elastic arms.
Due to the presence of this restraining system, these extraction instruments are relatively complicated. They are also delicate to manipulate since the handle can hinder access into the mouth.
The present invention seeks to alleviate these disadvantages and proposes, for this purpose, a dental instrument for the extraction of an object from a root canal, comprising a shaft having an open-end part designed to receive at least a part of the object, this open-end part being able to be deformed to permit seizing the object by clamping and then extracting it from the root canal, characterized in that the open-end part is tubular and is able to plastically deform, so as to lead to a reduction of its inner section, under the effect of a given stress.
Thus in the present invention, due to the tubular shape of the open-end part and the ability of this part to plastically deform, no system for maintaining the clamped position is necessary. The plastic deformation is initiated directly by the dentist, typically by applying the given stress from the end of the instrument opposite the open-end part and in such a way that this given stress acts against a reaction force exerted by the dentin on the open-end part. The given stress is, for example, a twisting movement, exerted when the open-end part is blocked from rotating in the dentin, at least in the direction of twisting, or an axial pressure, exerted when the open-end part abuts axially in the dentin. In addition to its simplicity, it will be noted that the extraction instrument according to the invention has for an advantage the ability to exert a substantial clamping force, permitting the releasing of broken instruments wedged in the root canal, even when the open-end part has a reduced wall thickness.
Particular embodiments of the invention are defined in the attached claims 3 to 18.
Other advantages and characteristics of the invention will appear upon reading the following detailed description made in reference to the attached drawings in which:
In reference to
Distal-end part 3 also comprises, in proximity to its open frontal face 4, a “weakened” zone 5 having oblong, preferably traversing openings 6 on its outer surface. In the example shown, zone 5 has three series of three openings inclined 45° relative to axis 7 of shaft 1. For convenience, only one of this series of three openings has been shown. The three series are identical and distributed uniformly (at 120°) over the periphery of zone 5. These openings 6 permit distal-end part 3 to plastically deform, i.e. in a non-elastic manner, and in a manner that leads to a reduction of the inner section of zone 5, under the effect of a twist applied to shaft 1.
Distal-end part 3 also has teeth 8 on its frontal face 4, regularly distributed around the opening of this frontal face, three teeth in the example illustrated, permitting the anchoring of shaft 1 in the dentin to block the instrument from rotating during the above-mentioned twisting.
Shaft 1 is typically made of stainless steel. However, other materials, particularly metals, may be suitable, with the condition that they can undergo a permanent, non-elastic, deformation.
The wall of shaft 1 is very thin, typically 0.1 mm.
The first step of the process consists of determining the diameter of the upper end, designated by 11, of the part of broken instrument 9 remaining in the canal by measuring the diameter of the corresponding end of the part of the broken instrument that remains outside the mouth, then to choose an extraction instrument whose inner diameter of shaft 1 is slightly superior to the diameter thus determined.
Then, as shown in
A space is then freed around upper end 11 of the broken instrument, by means of a trepan 14 having teeth 15 on its frontal face and whose diameter is roughly equal to the outer diameter of shaft 1 of the extraction instrument (
Finally, the extraction instrument penetrates into the root canal until its distal-end part 3 is lodged in space 16 and thus surrounds upper end 11 of the broken instrument (
In one variant of the extraction process, trepan 14 is the extraction instrument 1-2 itself, that is to say, that the extraction instrument, with its teeth 8, is used to create space 16 around upper end 11 of the broken instrument. In order to do this, one digs into the dentin by a movement of rotation and axial pressure sufficiently slow so as not to lead to deformation of distal-end part 3. Once space 16 is created, a more rapid movement is applied to the instrument in order to induce the twist and therefore the clamping of object 9 (
According to another variant, shown in
In the example of
In another variant (not shown), the weakened zone is made up of a zone of the distal-end part of the shaft, which [zone] has been thermally pretreated to render it more malleable than the rest of the shaft.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3322124 | Ireland | May 1967 | A |
4247285 | Roig-Greene | Jan 1981 | A |
4337038 | Saito et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4746292 | Johnson | May 1988 | A |
5085586 | Johnson | Feb 1992 | A |
5173049 | Levy | Dec 1992 | A |
5275563 | Cohen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5879160 | Ruddle | Mar 1999 | A |
5951286 | Rhodes | Sep 1999 | A |
6227855 | Hickok et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6280197 | Benado | Aug 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
PI 0005652-9 | Jun 2002 | BR |
100 23 195 | May 2000 | DE |
1213369 | Oct 1959 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040142302 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |