The present invention relates in general to a retraction material used to retract gingiva in dentistry, and more particularly to a retraction material and system facilitating placement of the retraction material around the gingival sulcus.
The traditional method for retracting gingival tissue prior to the taking of an impression of a prepared tooth to form a crown or bridge is to mechanically pack a small length of cord saturated with or without an astringent about the base of the tooth to enlarge the gingival sulcus space about the base of a tooth. After a period of time, the cord is removed from the enlarged space defined about the base of the tooth. Upon the removal of the cord, frequently coagulum forms to stop the bleeding or seepage of fluid and is removed with the cord which may result in the seepage of additional bleeding into the space. As a result, an impression cannot be made of the prepared tooth until the additional bleeding can be controlled or stopped. Thus, the traditional procedure for enlarging the space between the gum and the base of the tooth necessary for taking an accurate impression is tedious, time consuming and painful or extremely uncomfortable for the patient. Also, there exists the danger that the dentist may accidentally force the cord beyond the physiologic limit of the space to create a potential periodontal pocket which can cause the tooth to be eventually lost. The general practice of using the cord technique is relatively difficult and tedious for the dentist.
In the event that the space between the tooth and the gum that has to be retracted is very small, it becomes even more difficult for the dentist to place the cord without injuring the gum tissue and from forcing the cord beyond the physiologic limit, and renders the procedure more painful for the patient. Further, the placing of the cord is not a procedure which the dentist may delegate to a dental assistant or dental hygienist. Also, the packing of a retraction cord is a most disliked step to perform during a crown or bridge restoration procedure.
Efforts have been made to obviate the noted disadvantages of affecting the retraction of the gingival tissue by the use of a cord. One such known effort is the use of a kaolin type material that is mixed with an astringent salt which is simply placed about a prepared tooth to absorb the moisture to cause the gum tissue to shrink. Such a product is marketed by Sybron Dental Specialties under the brand name ExpaSyl.
It has been noted that such kaolin type material is packaged in a bulk cartridge similar to a typical anesthetic cartridge commonly used in a dental office that requires the cartridge to be used with a syringe. The end of the cartridge is pierced with a needlelike cannula and the force of the syringing pressure is required to extrude the clay like kaolin material through the cannula. Because of the density of the kaolin type material, the cannula requires the opening to be very large so as to enable the kaolin type material to flow therethrough. The large gauge opening of the cannula renders the bending of the cannula difficult and which bending is often required in order to place the material in difficult to reach places within a patient's mouth. Because the opening of the cannula is quite large, difficulty is encountered in placing the kaolin type material about the gingival sulcus in a manner similar to the traditional method of packing cord to retract the gum tissue.
Also, the use of such kaolin type material to retract the gum tissue tends to crumble, rendering it difficult to place in the space between the gum tissue and the tooth to attain the desired retraction of the gum tissue. Another noted problem with such kaolin type material is the removal of the kaolin material after the period of time required to affect the hemostasis and the retraction. Generally, the kaolin material is required to be washed out using a water-air spray with extreme care to remove all the kaolin material without restarting any bleeding in the gingival sulcus. Another kaolin based material intended to overcome some of these problems is manufactured by Primier Dental Products Company under the trademark Traxodent. This material is packaged in a bulk syringe and is less viscous than other materials, such as ExpaSyl material sold by Sybron Dental Specialties.
Another known technique for effecting a non-cord retraction and/or hemostasis is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,676,543 issuing to Dragan on Oct. 14, 1997. Therein disclosed is a generally two part process utilizing two different viscosities of a silicone material to effect the cordless retraction and/or hemostasis of the gingival sulcus.
Another retraction device is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,890,177 issuing to Dragan on May 10, 2005. Therein discloses is a more simplified cordless retraction method and device whereby the cordless retraction may be accomplished by resorting to a porous sponge or foam cellular dam which is shaped to conform with the prepared tooth or teeth, arranged to contain a two part silicone type impression material that includes a base portion and a catalyst, whereby the patient's biting force is utilized to apply the necessary pressure to effect the desired retraction.
Other devices and methods are used to retract the gingival sulcus e.g. Magic foam cord which is dependent upon an expanding silicone material which is a two-part, chemically cured component system that are required to be mixed by the dentist at chair side prior to application and which cures or sets to effect the retraction of the gingival tissue.
Another retraction device is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,241,143 issuing to Diskco, Jr. et al on Jul. 10, 2007. Therein disclosed is a preloaded tooth dam filled with a non-setting retraction material.
While there have been numerous efforts to improve the difficult procedure of retracting the gingival, many of these efforts have been solely directed to retraction of the gingival. Many of these efforts have resulted in adequate retraction, but have also left blood and saliva resulted in moist or damp margin at the sulcus that resulted in additional time or steps needed for dry the sulcus in order to obtain a good impression. Therefore, there is a need to improve the retraction procedure and to provide a procedure that will result in improved tooth margin areas that will result in the taking of better impressions.
This invention is directed to an improvement to the non-cord retraction devices and procedures described hereinabove for effecting cordless retraction of the gingival tissue by utilizing an improved retraction material that provided better margin or sulcus areas for taking an impression.
The present invention provides a retraction material achieving both retraction and absorption. The retraction material of the present invention comprises an astringent and absorbing agent. Additionally, a thickening agent may be used to improve placement of the retraction material.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to improve margin or sulcus area resulting in the taking of better impressions.
It is another object of the present invention to make retraction and impression preparation easy and efficient.
It is an advantage of the present invention that retraction and drying of the sulcus is accomplished in a single step.
It is another advantage of the present invention that the retraction martial is easily applied.
It is a feature of the present invention that an astringent and an absorbing agent are provided in a single retraction material.
It is another feature of the present invention that it is applied precisely with a syringe.
It is yet another feature of the present invention that the retraction material may be applied with cannulae that may be easily bent.
It is still another feature of the present invention that the retraction material may be dispensed with a plastic capsule or tip having a nozzle.
It is yet another feature of the present invention that a gentle water spray may be used that does not disturb the blood coagulum.
These and other objects, advantages, and features will become more readily apparent in view of the following detailed description.
The retraction material of the present invention has the unique properties of both providing retraction and absorption. The absorption or drying property aids in drying the gingival sulcus between the tooth and gingiva or gum aiding in removing excess fluids or blood which interfere with the taking of a good impression of the tooth and surrounding area. The impression is used in the dental procedure to restore the tooth. The impression of the tooth area may be done with conventional silicone based impression material or by digital imaging methods.
The retraction material comprises an astringent, absorbing agent, and a thickener. The astringent may be any material having astringing properties, such as aluminum chloride, aluminum sulfate, ferric chloride, sodium chloride, aluminum potassium sulfate, ammonium aluminum sulfate, tannic acid and any other equivalent or known astringent material. The absorbing or drying agent may be any material having absorbing or drying properties, such as potassium polyacrylate, sodium polyacrylate, sodium sulfate, silica gel, magnesium sulfate, calcium sulfate, corn starch, calcium chloride, sodium chloride, and any other equivalent or known absorbing or drying material or chemical desiccant. The thickening agent may be any material having thickening properties, such as corn starch, guar gum, xanthan, fumed silica, and any other equivalent or known thickening material.
A preferred formulation of the retraction material of the present invention is indicated below.
Several formulations of the retraction material have been prepared and in testing have been successful in aiding retraction. The different formulations are indicated below.
A 25% saturated solution of aluminum chloride was prepared in 50 cc of distilled water. To the aluminum chloride solution 5 grams of sodium polyacraylate and 10 grams of fumed silica was added through a sieve.
A 25% saturated solution of aluminum chloride was prepared in 100 cc of distilled water. To the aluminum chloride solution 10 grams of sodium polyacraylate and 20 grams of fumed silica was added through a sieve.
A 25% saturated solution of aluminum sulfate was prepared in 50 cc of distilled water. To the aluminum sulfate solution 5 grams of sodium polyacraylate and 10 grams of fumed silica were added through a sieve.
A 100% saturated solution of sodium chloride was prepared in 50 cc of distilled water. To the sodium chloride solution 5 grams of sodium polyacraylate and 4 grams of fumed silica were added through a sieve.
A 100% saturated solution of sodium chloride was prepared in 50 cc of distilled water. To the sodium chloride solution 10 grams of sodium polyacraylate was added through a sieve.
The following Formula 6 has been prepared and found to be particularly preferred and beneficial in performing retraction of gingiva due to its ease of delivery and retraction affect.
Other water soluble carries, such as glycerin may also be used in this formula. Therefore, water, glycerin or any water soluble agent may be a carrying agent for the ingredients in the different formulations.
The main purpose of these formulas is to create a heavy gel or paste that can be easily inserted directly into and around the gingival sulcus through a very small opening either through a cannula or a small discharge nozzle of a capsule, such as the capsule disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,581,399 issuing to Dragan on Jun. 1, 1971, which is herein incorporated by reference.
The retraction material of the present invention has a heavy gel type or paste like consistency making it ideally suited to dispensing with a capsule or tube having a needle cannula or small diameter discharge nozzle. The retraction material can be extruded or dispensed through a needle cannula as small as from 18 to 22 gauge. This greatly facilitates precise and easy placement of the retraction material directly into the gingival sulcus. Additionally, injecting the gel has a mechanical action to help retract the gingival sulcus. The capsule or tube may have a needle cannula or may be any capsule or tube, and is preferably a capsule and cannula similar to the one disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,052,927 issuing to Discko, Jr. on Oct. 1, 1991, which is herein incorporated by reference. Another capsule or tube without a needle cannula that may be used is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,581,399 issuing to Dragan on Jun. 1, 1971, which is herein incorporated by reference.
The retraction material of the present invention can be used in a dental procedure for restoring a tooth according to the following method steps.
1. Preparing a tooth or teeth for a restoration;
2. Placing the retraction material in a capsule with or without a needle cannula and placing the capsule in a syringe;
3. If the capsule has a needle cannula, bending the needle cannula to provide easy access to the gingival;
4. Placing the needle cannula or tip of the capsule into the gingival sulcus and slowly injecting the retraction material around the gingival sulcus and the entire perimeter or circumference of the tooth or teeth;
5. Letting the retraction material remain or stand for between 2 and 5 minutes depending upon the amount of gingival crevicular fluid;
6. Gently rinsing the retraction material away;
7. Drying the area around the tooth or teeth; and
8. Proceeding with dental procedure, such as taking an impression.
The additional step of adding pressure with a cap placed over the tooth or teeth and gingival sulcus may also be practiced, preferably between steps 4 and 5 above. The biting pressure of the patient holding the material in close proximity will aid in the retraction of the gingival sulcus.
While the present invention has been described with respect to several embodiments, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/212,005 filed Apr. 6, 2009. This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/825,802 filed Jul. 9, 2007, which is a continuation-in-part of Application No. PCT/US07/008,232 filed Mar. 30, 2007, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2396203 | Robinson | Mar 1946 | A |
2620502 | Russak | Dec 1952 | A |
3056205 | Ennor | Oct 1962 | A |
3238620 | Robertson | Mar 1966 | A |
3380446 | Martin | Apr 1968 | A |
3581399 | Dragan | Jun 1971 | A |
3705585 | Saffro | Dec 1972 | A |
4071955 | Julius | Feb 1978 | A |
4108979 | Muhler et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4144882 | Takemoto et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4173219 | Lentine | Nov 1979 | A |
4198756 | Dragan | Apr 1980 | A |
4348178 | Kurz | Sep 1982 | A |
4396599 | Sipos | Aug 1983 | A |
4468202 | Cohen | Aug 1984 | A |
4531914 | Spinello | Jul 1985 | A |
4543063 | Cohen | Sep 1985 | A |
4551100 | Fischer | Nov 1985 | A |
4617950 | Porteous et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4677139 | Feinmann et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4867680 | Hare et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4961706 | Jefferies | Oct 1990 | A |
5006571 | Kumar et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5052927 | Discko, Jr. | Oct 1991 | A |
5063056 | Yamamoto | Nov 1991 | A |
5190457 | Schreinemakers | Mar 1993 | A |
5213498 | Pelerin | May 1993 | A |
5266338 | Cascione et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5362495 | Lesage | Nov 1994 | A |
5385469 | Weissman | Jan 1995 | A |
5635162 | Fischer | Jun 1997 | A |
5639445 | Curtis et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5651959 | Hill et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5676543 | Dragan | Oct 1997 | A |
5795585 | Ikeda et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5955513 | Hare | Sep 1999 | A |
5980249 | Fontenot | Nov 1999 | A |
6050821 | Klaassen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6106811 | Gibbs | Aug 2000 | A |
6155262 | Thornton et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6290941 | Lahanas et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6375461 | Jensen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6568398 | Cohen | May 2003 | B2 |
6616753 | Reddy et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6652840 | Prevendar | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6890177 | Dragan | May 2005 | B2 |
7033173 | Coopersmith | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7153134 | Coopersmith | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163969 | Ahmed et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7189075 | Dragan | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7195483 | Dragan | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7241143 | Dragan | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7273623 | Kiel et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7328706 | Bardach et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
20030228339 | El-Nokaly et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040126740 | Coopersmith | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040180008 | Yamaguchi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040234926 | Halldin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040265777 | Heasley | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008583 | White | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050069838 | Kollefrath et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050118552 | Coopersmith | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050175959 | Jodaikin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050202367 | Kollefrath et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060063128 | Dragan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070065770 | Lubbers et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070218421 | Narang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070259313 | Dragan et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070264315 | Fournie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100035213 | Lubbers et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100261136 | Schulte et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1124976 | Aug 1968 | GB |
2005179287 | Jul 2005 | JP |
WO 2009076332 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009092568 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
JP 2005179287 A (machine translation Jul. 12, 2011). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100255443 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61212005 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11825802 | Jul 2007 | US |
Child | 12798396 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2007/008232 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 11825802 | US |