Mixtures of micron-sized particles, such as platinum and TEFLON®, are impelled within a cloud deposition tower by means of pressurized inert gas so as to impinge on a target, such as a porous carbon substrate of a fuel cell, the gas being drawn off through the pores by vacuum. The field of impingement is adjustable by means of hinged walls, or selectable interior wall structures.
A common manufacturing process includes the deposition of mixtures of micron-sized (microscopic, hereinafter) particles. One example is the deposition of a mixture of microscopic particles of TEFLON® and catalyst, such as platinum, on porous carbon substrates used in fuel cells, such as the gas diffusion layer. Another example is diffusion of microscopic carbon and TEFLON® particles on porous carbon substrates so as to provide hydrophobic carbon/carbon substrates (or micro porous layer).
Herein, the devices that enable the deposition of microscopic particles will be referred to as a cloud tower, since typical apparatus resembles a truncated pyramid tower disposed over a vacuum work table, into which the microscopic particles are impelled by inert gas, such as nitrogen.
The cloud tower is fed by a tube or other passageway from material processing apparatus. One example is the formation of a slurry of a desired catalyst and TEFLON®. The slurry is then dried to form pellets, and the pellets are ground into microscopic particles. The pellets are drawn into the hose or other conduit by high pressure inert gas, such as nitrogen, which may be accomplished using an eductor, (sometimes called an ejector).
The work table is either formed of a suitable mesh or has a substantial number of holes therein so as to substantially uniformly apply a vacuum which is attached to the bottom of the work table, to attract and thereby distribute the particles throughout the target area, to draw the inert gas through the pores of the substrate being treated, and for exhaust to atmosphere. Typically, the work table, including the vacuum apparatus, may be raised and lowered in order to place the substrates within the cloud tower for processing; alternatively, the cloud tower itself may be raised due to suitable flexibility in the tube or other conduit.
The cloud towers are custom designed in each case to service a selected size of a sheet of porous carbonaceous material to be processed. Heretofore, the only way to alter the size of the deposition would entail a redesigning of the tower itself in addition to adjusting the points of application of vacuum. While the application of vacuum is easily adjusted, by masking or otherwise, without affecting the process itself (other than the points of application of vacuum), the utilization of a mask within the cloud tower alters the flow distribution of the cloud of mixed microscopic particles, causing wavelets and other distortion in the localized magnitude of distribution. Furthermore, there is local distortion at the mask/substrate interface. These effects easily result in an unwanted variation in the distribution of the particles, and therefore a variation in the degree of activity, for instance, in a substrate having catalyst deposited thereon.
Therefore, means other than the utilization of a mask on a substrate are needed in order to adjust the size or shape of the field of deposition of microscopic particles.
Disclosed is a cloud tower which receives microscopic particles impelled by an inert gas for deposition on a porous substrate having vacuum disposed on a side of the substrate opposite to that on which the microscopic particles are impinged, with the ability to alter the size and/or shape of the deposition field without changing the entire tower structure.
A first embodiment of the modality herein includes a pair of flaps hinged on one side, or on a pair of opposed sides of the cloud tower so as to change the deposition area from a square to a rectangle, or from a larger rectangle to a smaller rectangle or square. Another embodiment is the utilization of the primary cloud tower together with selectable tower inserts which are smaller than the primary tower structure, fitting therein and sealing thereto, thereby altering the shape and/or size of the target area. The inserts may provide deposition fields in the shape of circles, ovals, ellipsis, small squares, smaller squares or rectangles, or otherwise as is desired.
In the utilization of the present modality, masking of the area of application of vacuum may occur with simple masking, because the masking itself will not alter the cloud deposition process in any way except to limit the vacuum to the desired field of deposition.
The modality herein may be utilized for the application of any microscopic particles or mixtures of particles which are suited to pressurized, impelled dispersion onto porous substrates aided by a vacuum, as is within the capability of cloud towers in general. This includes mixtures other than those of a catalyst with TEFLON®, or carbon with TEFLON®; as those are only examples of the modality herein.
Other variations will become more apparent in the light of the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
The mixture of particles is provided by a source 19 of, for example, catalyst and TEFLON®, in a slurry. This is provided to a dryer 21 that converts the catalyst and TEFLON® into a mixture of small, dry pellets. The pellets are provided to a grinder 23, which provides microscopic particles of catalyst and TEFLON® to the tube 16.
The microscopic particles may be ingested into the tube 16 through the secondary inlet of an eductor not shown (sometimes referred to as an ejector), the primary inlet to which is attached to pressurized inert gas, or in some other conventional fashion. The pressure of the gas need not be much above atmospheric but simply enough to impel the pellets through the tube 16 and into the tower 11.
The pyramid has flanges 27 which may include soft seals, which rest on the target, such as a porous substrate 29, which in turn is carried by a work station table 31. In the present example, the porous substrate 29 is carbon. The work station table 31 is either a mesh or has numerous holes therein throughout the intended deposition area so as to provide vacuum to the interior of the pyramid 12, as represented by the arrow 34. The vacuum assists in dispersing the microscopic particles throughout the area within the pyramid 12, thereby to cover the entire intended portion of the porous substrate 29. The vacuum also draws the inert gas away from the substrate surface so as to allow the continuum of impingement to occur.
The description thus far is of a microscopic particle cloud deposition tower apparatus known to the art. In accordance with the modality herein, however, there is provided a tower insert 36, which in this case is also a pyramid. Although the pyramid 12 (referred to hereinafter as the primary pyramid 12) is typically a square pyramid in the prior art, the shape thereof is immaterial to the modality herein. Similarly, pyramid-shaped tower insert 36 in accordance with the modality herein may be square or rectangle despite the shape of the primary pyramid 12, so long as the selected tower insert 36 will fit therein. The size of the selected tower insert may also vary as desired.
In another embodiment, two flaps 43, 44 are able to swing between an inoperative position, as in
Referring to
The flaps 43, 44 are moved into the operative position shown in
A soft seal may be placed along the back of flap 44 and along the front of the flap 43 where such seals could touch the opposing flap, as desired in any given implementation of the modality herein. However, such seals may generally be unnecessary. Further, when the flaps are in the operative position as shown in
Referring to
To accommodate the horizontal movement between the two flaps as they move to and from the operational position, a slot 71 is provided in the flap 43, to allow horizontal motion of the rod 62 as the flap 44, to which it is fastened, moves back and forth horizontally, as both flaps move up or down, due to the non-horizontal position of the hinges 47, 48. The rod 62, push plate 66 and slot 71 are shown in
In this embodiment, the hinges 47, 48 are disposed directly to the primary pyramid 45. Obviously, if the flaps 43, 44 were wider, the slot 71 longer, and the hinges slideable upwardly, then the target area on the substrate 29 could be reduced further. With shorter but wider flaps and hinges slideable downwardly, that would permit having the degree of target area illustrated in
The foregoing has been described with respect to flaps 43, 44 disposed on a single wall 45. Similar flaps may be disposed on a wall opposite to the wall 45 as desired, to provide further adjustment to the target size and shape, as well as positioning of the target.
The description referring to
Since changes and variations of the disclosed embodiments may be made without departing from the concept's intent, it is not intended to limit the disclosure other than as required by the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/071321 | 12/21/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/098905 | 6/26/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2842093 | O'Neill | Jul 1958 | A |
3545996 | Duncan | Dec 1970 | A |
3695226 | Wanner | Oct 1972 | A |
3745969 | Huffman | Jul 1973 | A |
4233181 | Goller | Nov 1980 | A |
4340563 | Appel | Jul 1982 | A |
4783006 | Hayashi | Nov 1988 | A |
4791007 | Gleason | Dec 1988 | A |
4933211 | Sauvinet | Jun 1990 | A |
5520735 | Mulder | May 1996 | A |
5529815 | Lemelson | Jun 1996 | A |
5656138 | Scobey et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5790913 | Roberts, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807435 | Poliniak | Sep 1998 | A |
5811020 | Alwan | Sep 1998 | A |
6312526 | Yamamuka | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6490994 | Yoshizawa | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6638880 | Yamamuka | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6746539 | Sun | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7618493 | Yamada | Nov 2009 | B2 |
8039052 | Endo | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8770143 | Endo | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9303316 | Shufflebotham | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9731304 | Paris | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20020100424 | Sun et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020134668 | Wan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030131791 | Schultz | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050059246 | Yamada | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060231031 | Dings | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070074661 | Franken | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080098956 | Serfozo | May 2008 | A1 |
20090061087 | Endo | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100075051 | Darling | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20120107497 | Steinmann | May 2012 | A1 |
20130192519 | Kim | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140311408 | De | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2008057000 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2009102713 | May 2009 | JP |
9317182 | Sep 1993 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 12890350.7 dated Jun. 27, 2016. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2012/071321 dated Aug. 27, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150336120 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |