Depressor in iron ore flotation comprising sugar cane bagasse, use of sugar cane bagasse as depressor in iron ore flotation and process of preparing depressor comprising sugar cane bagasse

Abstract

A depressor in iron ore flotation comprises sugar cane bagasse and caustic soda so as to assist in the iron ore flotation.

Description

STATE OF THE ART

The concentration of minerals occurs when it is necessary to separate the minerals or metals of interest from those which are not. For this separation to occur, the minerals of interest cannot be physically aggregated to those which are not of interest. In such case, it is necessary to perform stages of fragmentation and classification so as to achieve this separation.

To perform the separation of minerals, there must be a physical or physical-chemical difference between the metal of interest and the other components in the mineral and it may be easy or highly complex, depending on the mineral. The most used physical properties in separating or concentrating minerals or metals are the difference in density or difference in magnetic susceptibility. In contrast, when there is no difference in minimal physical property between the minerals or metals that need to be separated, techniques are used based on the physical-chemical properties of the surface of the materials. The most widely used technique in this case is flotation. It is a highly versatile and selective process. It allows concentrates to be obtained that have high contents and significant recoveries. It is usually applied in the processing of minerals with low content and fine granulometry generally in an aqueous suspension. Furthermore, it is possible to use specific reagents, such as collectors, depressors and modifiers, which assist in the selective recovery of the minerals or metals of interest.

Starch is known to be used to assist in iron ore flotation in order to achieve lower iron contents in flotation reject of this mineral.

The present invention discloses a novel depressor to assist the flotation of the iron ore in order to obtain lower iron contents in the reject of said flotation.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1—evolution of the tests with greater depressor dosage.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention refers to a novel depressor to assist in the flotation of iron ore so as to obtain iron contents in the reject of said flotation in accordance with current standards.

More specifically, it refers to the use of sugar cane bagasse as depressor in iron ore flotation.

It further refers to a process of preparing depressor in iron ore flotation that comprises sugar cane bagasse and caustic soda.

Demonstrated below are preferred embodiments of a process of preparing depressor comprising sugar cane bagasse.

The process of preparing a depressor comprising treated sugar cane bagasse comprises the following stages:

• • a. mixing sugar cane bagasse with water, obtaining a first mixture;
  • b. adding caustic soda to the mixture above at a ratio of 6:1 to 10:1 part of bagasse: caustic soda, obtaining a second mixture;
  • c. letting it stand;
  • d. adding additional water, and
  • e. agitating

The feed samples of the flotation (mineral) were filtered, homogenized and quartered, separating amounts of 1800 g for each test.

In a first preferred embodiment of the invention, the process of preparing a depressor comprising treated sugar cane bagasse comprises the following stages:

• • a. mixing 10 grams of the treated sugar cane bagasse with 250 ml of water, obtaining a first mixture;
  • b. after 5 minutes, adding caustic soda to the mixture above at a ratio of 8:1 part of bagasse: caustic soda, obtaining a second mixture;
  • c. letting it stand for a further 30 minutes;
  • d. adding water until reaching 1000 ml, and
  • e. agitating for a further 10 minutes in an agitator, obtaining the depressor.

The total time for carrying out the process of preparing depressor comprising sugar cane bagasse is similar to the time for preparing an iron ore depressor comprising corn starch.

The depressor comprising sugar cane bagasse was conditioned for 3 minutes and amine (amine solution at 1%) for 1 minute.

The flotation of the iron ore using a depressor comprising sugar cane bagasse was carried out, and the reject was collected from 2 minutes to 2 minutes and 30 seconds.

The tests were carried out according to workbench test standards (flotation until exhaustion). The parameters used for the flotation tests are shown in table 1.

TABLE 1
parameters used in the tests.
	Test	1	2	3	4
	pH	10.8	10.0	10	10.05
	Depressor/	500 g/t	700 g/t	900 g/t	1100 g/t
	bagasse
	Amine	180 g/t	180 g/t	180 g/t	180 g/t
		Sio2	Sio2	Sio2	Sio2

Chemical results and flotation performance are shown in table 2 below.

TABLE 2
Chemical results.
IDENTIFICATION	Fe	SiO2	P	Al2O3	Mn	TiO2
Tests 01 - 500 g/t	Concentrate	66.710	1.720	0.043	0.300	0.156	0.049
	Reject	13.890	78.280	0.013	0.490	0.046	0.001
Tests 01 - 700 g/t	Concentrate	67.020	1.740	0.049	0.340	0.181	0.047
	Reject	21.550	67.840	0.010	0.400	0.016	0.001
Tests 01 - 900 g/t	Concentrate	67.050	1.250	0.047	0.310	0.172	0.047
	Reject	18.500	72.010	0.008	0.450	0.015	0.001
Tests 01 - 1100 g/t	Concentrate	66.670	1.910	0.045	0.340	0.161	0.039
	Reject	18.310	71.840	0.014	0.470	0.053	0.019
	IDENTIFICATION	CaO	MgO	PPC
	Tests 01 - 500 g/t	Concentrate	0.011	0.018	1.70
		Reject	0.009	0.015	0.57
	Tests 01 - 700 g/t	Concentrate	0.013	0.035	1.96
		Reject	0.006	0.043	0.30
	Tests 01 - 900 g/t	Concentrate	0.014	0.001	1.89
		Reject	0.006	0.005	0.36
	Tests 01 - 1100 g/t	Concentrate	0.011	0.071	1.76
		Reject	0.007	0.041	0.56

TABLE 3
Flotation performance.
Complementary information	Test 1	Test 2	Test 3	Test 4
Mass recovery	67.13	61.14	63.54	64.19
Metal recovery	90.75	83.03	86.33	86.71
Gaudin selectivity index	14.78	11.01	14.45	11.70

Analyzing the results shown in the tables above, the following is concluded:

• • with the cane bagasse, there was a delay in the discharge of the reject;
  • the pH used in test 1 (pH 9.5 to 11.0) showed better results of Fe content in the reject (13.89%).

In a second preferred embodiment of the invention, the process of preparing a depressor comprising sugar cane bagasse treated comprises the following stages:

• • a. mixing 10 grams of the sugar cane bagasse treated with 250 ml of water, obtaining a first mixture;
  • b. after 5 minutes, adding caustic soda to the mixture above in a ratio of 8:1 part of bagasse: caustic soda, obtaining a second mixture;
  • c. letting it stand for a further 30 minutes;
  • d. adding water until reaching 1000 ml, and
  • e. agitating for a further 10 minutes in a mechanical agitator.

The product of this process is the depressor comprising sugar cane bagasse.

The total time for carrying out the process of preparing depressor comprising sugar cane bagasse is similar to the time for preparing an iron ore depressor comprising corn starch.

Preferably, the preparation of depressor (corn starch or BMC) together with NaOH may comprise the following additional stages:

• • i. Determining the humidity of the first mixture (sugar cane bagasse) before beginning the first mixture;
  • ii. Measuring the mass (30 to 40 g) of the material and annotating its value;
  • iii. Placing the material to dry in a hothouse at a temperature of 105° C. for about 2 hours;
  • iv. Withdrawing the material from the hothouse,
  • v. Letting it cool for about 10 minutes,
  • vi. Measuring the mass of the material stage v;
  • vii. Annotating the value of the mass after drying and calculating the humidity as follows:

$\mathrm{UD}=\left(1-\frac{\mathrm{PS}}{\mathrm{PU}}\right)\times 100$ Wherein:

• UD=humidity of the material−sugar cane bagasse (%)
• PS=dry weight of the material−sugar cane bagasse (g)
• PU=wet weight of the material−sugar cane bagasse (g)
  • viii. Calculating the masses: material−sugar cane bagasse and sodium hydroxide using the formulae set forth below:

$M_3=\frac{C_3\times M_4}{100}$ $M_5=\frac{M_3}{100-U}\times 100$ $M_6=\frac{M_3}{Y}\times 2$

Wherein:

• M₃=dry mass of the material−sugar cane bagasse (g)
• C₃=desired concentration of the depressor solution (%)
• M₄=desired mass of the depressor solution (g)
• M₅=wet mass of the material−sugar cane bagasse (g)
• U=humidity of the material−sugar cane bagasse (%)
• M₆=mass of caustic soda at 50% (g)
• Y=numerator of the ratio sugar cane bagasse/caustic soda
  • ix. Calculating the masses: gelatinization water and dilution:M₇=(M₄×0.1)−M₅−M₆ M₈=M₄−M₅−M₆−M₇ Wherein:
• M₇=mass of water for gelatinization at 10% (g)
• M_g=mass of water for dilution of the solution to the desired concentration (g)
  • x. Positioning a recipient next to the agitator. If hot water is needed, use the agitator with heater;
  • xi. Adding gelatinization water (M7) into the recipient and agitate;
  • xii. Slowing adding the first mixture (M5) into the preparation recipient and wait for about 10 minutes;
  • xiii. Slowing adding the solution of caustic soda (M6);
  • xiv. Adjusting the rotation of the agitator so as to maintain the solution homogeneous during gelatinization;
  • xv. Waiting for about 20 minutes for full gelatinization of the second mixture;
  • xvi. Adding into the recipient the dilution water (M8) and waiting for about 10 minutes. If the recipient cannot accommodate all the mass, transfer the second mixture to a second recipient with greater capacity;
  • xvii. Switch off the agitator after 10 minutes;
  • xviii. Make the second prepared mixture available for use, protecting it from contaminations;
  • xix. After preparing the second mixture, check its concentration using a refractometer.

The flotation of the iron ore using a depressor comprising sugar cane bagasse was carried out, and the reject collected from 2 minutes to 2 minutes and 30 seconds.

The tests were carried out according to workbench test standards (flotation until exhaustion). The parameters used for the flotation tests are shown in table 1.

The parameters used for the flotation tests are shown in table 4.

		Amine	Ratio
	Depressor	EDA-C	Starch/Caustic	pH	pH	Time of
Test	(g/t)	(g/t SiO2)	Soda	Test	Final	Test(s)
01	Gritz - 650	190	8:1	9.5	8.6	180
02	Gritz - 650	190	8:1	9.5	8.5	130
03	BMC - 650	190	8:1	10.0	8.8	210
04	BMC - 450	190	8:1	9.5	8.0	120
05	BMC - 450	190	8:1	10.0	8.7	250
06	BMC - 450	190	8:1	10.5	9.7	210
07	BMC - 650	190	8:1	9.5	7.9	150
08	BMC - 650	190	8:1	10.0	8.9	220
09	BMC - 650	190	8:1	10.5	9.5	160
10	BMC - 1200	190	10:1	10.5	9.3	85
11	BMC - 2400	190	10:1	10.5	9.9	90
12	BMC - 1200	90	10:1	10.5		120
13	BMC - 2400	90	10:1	10.5	10.2	90
14	BMC - 1200	90	10:1	10.5	9.8	95
	Dry
15	BMC - 2400	90	10:1	10.5	10.0	96
	Dry
16	BMC - 450	90	10:1	9.5	7.9	130

The tests for evaluating the performance of the depressor are described in the table below.

	Mass
	recovery	Chemical Analysis (%)
Test	Flow	(%)	Fe	SiO2	P	Al2O3	Mn	TiO2
01	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	47.49	68.16	0.54	0.054	0.31	0.062	0.019
	trate
	Reject	52.51	27.08	60.56	0.012	0.34	0.007	0.001
02	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	49.25	67.86	0.47	0.052	0.33	0.059	0.016
	trate
	Reject	50.75	23.87	64.76	0.007	0.32	0.001	0.001
03	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	16.90	66.73	0.87	0.088	0.41	0.124	0.015
	trate
	Reject	83.10	41.96	38.32	0.020	0.34	0.018	0.005
04	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	20.43	66.77	1.09	0.083	0.39	0.120	0.013
	trate
	Reject	79.57	40.49	40.77	0.017	0.31	0.006	0.006
05	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	15.83	65.68	1.06	0.088	0.46	0.134	0.015
	trate
	Reject	84.17	42.03	39.08	0.017	0.29	0.008	0.005
06	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	12.32	65.84	0.82	0.095	0.45	0.148	0.012
	trate
	Reject	87.68	43.01	37.25	0.020	0.29	0.013	0.005
07	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	21.57	66.34	1.20	0.080	0.42	0.123	0.014
	trate
	Reject	78.43	40.10	41.56	0.016	0.30	0.004	0.005
08	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	13.46	66.11	0.75	0.096	0.43	0.149	0.012
	trate
	Reject	86.54	42.56	37.56	0.019	0.30	0.011	0.006
09	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	14.84	65.91	0.90	0.087	0.40	0.130	0.013
	trate
	Reject	85.16	42.11	38.29	0.018	0.29	0.012	0.006
10	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	22.79	65.89	0.95	0.077	0.34	0.098	0.012
	trate
	Reject	77.21	39.56	42.03	0.015	0.33	0.009	0.003
11	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	42.05	67.35	0.87	0.056	0.28	0.069	0.016
	trate
	Reject	57.95	29.74	57.04	0.011	0.34	0.003	0.001
12	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	45.31	66.84	1.38	0.059	0.31	0.068	0.016
	trate
	Reject	54.69	28.00	59.86	0.005	0.30	0.001	0.001
13	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	65.01	63.20	6.96	0.041	0.27	0.050	0.016
	trate
	Reject	34.99	10.92	82.58	0.004	0.36	0.001	0.001
14	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	47.22	66.85	1.55	0.054	0.31	0.066	0.018
	trate
	Reject	52.78	26.99	60.99	0.005	0.31	0.001	0.001
15	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	67.45	60.16	11.39	0.040	0.30	0.046	0.012
	trate
	Reject	32.55	15.23	77.71	0.003	0.34	0.001	0.001
16	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	0.008
	Concen-	30.60	66.02	1.86	0.067	0.35	0.090	0.014
	trate
	Reject	69.40	36.39	46.58	0.009	0.29	0.001	0.001
	Mass
	recovery	Chemical Analysis (%)
Test	Flow	(%)	CaO	MgO	PPC
01	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	47.49	0.001	0.001	2.16
	Reject	52.51	0.001	0.001	0.75
02	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	49.25	0.001	0.001	2.15
	Reject	50.75	0.001	0.001	0.59
03	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	16.90	0.001	0.001	3.68
	Reject	83.10	0.001	0.001	1.09
04	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	20.43	0.001	0.001	3.43
	Reject	79.57	0.001	0.001	0.83
05	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	15.83	0.001	0.001	3.72
	Reject	84.17	0.001	0.001	0.87
06	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	12.32	0.001	0.001	4.03
	Reject	87.68	0.001	0.001	0.95
07	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	21.57	0.002	0.001	3.53
	Reject	78.43	0.001	0.001	0.73
08	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	13.46	0.001	0.001	4.02
	Reject	86.54	0.001	0.001	0.93
09	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	14.84	0.001	0.001	3.77
	Reject	85.16	0.001	0.001	0.90
10	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	22.79	0.005	0.001	3.44
	Reject	77.21	0.001	0.001	0.84
11	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	42.05	0.001	0.001	2.58
	Reject	57.95	0.001	0.001	0.60
12	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	45.31	0.001	0.001	2.44
	Reject	54.69	0.001	0.001	0.48
13	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	65.01	0.001	0.001	2.03
	Reject	34.99	0.001	0.001	0.48
14	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	47.22	0.001	0.001	2.38
	Reject	52.78	0.001	0.001	0.50
15	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	67.45	0.001	0.001	1.94
	Reject	32.55	0.001	0.001	0.54
16	Feed	100.00	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	30.60	0.001	0.001	2.94
	Reject	69.40	0.001	0.001	0.66

It is possible to conclude that the depressor comprising sugar cane bagasse works. Furthermore, it can be noted that the best performance of the flotation, in terms of yield mass and optimum content of SiO₂ in the concentrate, was obtained in test 12, with dosage of BMC (depressor) at 1200 g/t fed, amine dosage at 90 g/t SiO₂, ratio BMC/caustic soda 10:1 and pH 10.5.

Based on this result, new tests were carried out with greater dosages of the depressor and a low dosage of amine 90 g/t SiO₂. The parameters used for the flotation tests are shown in table below.

		Amine
	Depressor	EDA-C			Time of
Test	(g/t)	(g/t SiO2)	pH Test	pH Final	Test(s)
01	800	90	10.50	9.8	120
02	1000	90	10.50	8.9	118
03	1100	90	10.50	9.8	119
04	1300	90	10.50	9.5	121
05	1400	90	10.50	9.8	115
06	1500	90	10.50	9.9	121
07	1600	90	10.50	9.9	122
08	2000	90	10.50	9.9	119

The table below shows the results obtained with these new parameters:

	Mass
	recovery	Chemical Analysis (%)
Test	Flow	(%)	Fe	SiO2	P	Al2O3	Mn	PPC
01	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	1.35
	Concen-	44.15	66.56	1.06	0.062	0.44	0.062	2.44
	trate
	Reject	55.85	27.38	59.79	0.008	0.39	0.001	0.48
02	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	1.35
	Concen-	45.52	67.20	1.45	0.058	0.44	0.065	2.44
	trate
	Reject	54.48	27.58	60.03	0.008	0.19	0.009	0.45
03	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	1.35
	Concen-	50.36	67.61	1.13	0.053	0.44	0.060	2.29
	trate
	Reject	49.64	23.05	67.15	0.005	0.41	0.001	0.43
04	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	1.35
	Concen-	54.38	67.01	1.07	0.052	0.43	0.056	2.13
	trate
	Reject	45.62	19.46	71.51	0.004	0.47	0.001	0.45
05	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	1.35
	Concen-	56.31	67.06	1.20	0.051	0.44	0.054	2.02
	trate
	Reject	43.69	16.74	74.68	0.009	0.46	0.001	0.44
06	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	1.35
	Concen-	56.59	67.46	1.38	0.053	0.44	0.054	2.13
	trate
	Reject	43.41	16.45	75.60	0.004	0.42	0.001	0.44
07	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	1.35
	Concen-	57.89	66.79	2.27	0.046	0.42	0.054	2.11
	trate
	Reject	42.11	15.79	76.26	0.003	0.43	0.001	0.45
08	Feed	100.00	45.70	33.89	0.032	0.28	0.031	1.35
	Concen-	63.87	63.36	7.77	0.043	0.40	0.049	2.00
	trate
	Reject	36.13	13.24	79.27	0.004	0.42	0.001	0.47
	Mass
	recovery	Chemical Analysis (%)
Test	Flow	(%)	TiO2	CaO	MgO	PPC
01	Feed	100.00	0.008	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	44.15	0.019	0.012	0.254	2.44
	Reject	55.85	0.001	0.008	0.215	0.48
02	Feed	100.00	0.008	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	45.52	0.019	0.015	0.001	2.44
	Reject	54.48	0.001	0.013	0.001	0.45
03	Feed	100.00	0.008	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	50.36	0.018	0.017	0.001	2.29
	Reject	49.64	0.001	0.008	0.001	0.43
04	Feed	100.00	0.008	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	54.38	0.020	0.021	0.001	2.13
	Reject	45.62	0.001	0.019	0.001	0.45
05	Feed	100.00	0.008	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	56.31	0.020	0.019	0.001	2.02
	Reject	43.69	0.001	0.023	0.001	0.44
06	Feed	100.00	0.008	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	56.59	0.020	0.026	0.001	2.13
	Reject	43.41	0.001	0.014	0.001	0.44
07	Feed	100.00	0.008	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	57.89	0.021	0.013	0.001	2.11
	Reject	42.11	0.001	0.012	0.001	0.45
08	Feed	100.00	0.008	0.001	0.001	1.35
	Concentrate	63.87	0.017	0.011	0.001	2.00
	Reject	36.13	0.001	0.008	0.001	0.47

It is noted that with the use of lower dosages of amine excellent results were obtained in the quality of the concentrate and mass yield. The tests confirm the use of cane bagasse as a depressor of iron ore in reverse flotation.

Claims

1. A process of preparing a depressor in iron ore flotation, comprising: a. mixing sugar cane bagasse with water, obtaining a first mixture comprising the sugar cane bagasse and the water;b. adding caustic soda to the first mixture at a weight ratio of 6:1 to 10:1 of sugar cane bagasse:caustic soda, thereby obtaining a second mixture comprising the sugar cane bagasse, the water, and the caustic soda;c. letting the second mixture stand;d. adding additional water to the second mixture, thereby obtaining a third mixture comprising the sugar cane bagasse, the water, the caustic soda, and the additional water, ande. agitating.

2. The process of preparing a depressor in iron flotation of claim 1, wherein said ratio between bagasse: caustic soda is preferably 8:1.

3. The process according to claim 1, wherein the caustic soda is added to the first mixture at a weight ratio of 8:1 part of sugar cane bagasse:caustic soda.

4. The process according to claim 1, wherein in step “c” the second mixture stands for 30 minutes.

5. The process according to claim 1, wherein water is added until reaching 1000 ml.

6. The process according to claim 1, wherein the agitating includes agitation for 10 minutes in a mechanical agitator.

7. The process according to claim 1, wherein the pH is between 9.5 and 11.0.

8. A process of preparing a depressor in iron ore flotation, comprising: measuring a mass of an amount of sugar cane bagasse;drying the sugar cane bagasse in a hothouse at a temperature of 105° C for about 2 hours;withdrawing the sugar cane bagasse from the hothouse and letting the sugar cane bagasse cool for about 10 minutes;measuring the mass of the sugar cane bagasse after the cooling;calculating a humidity of the sugar cane bagasse based on the mass measured prior to the drying and the mass measured after the cooling;adding a first water into a recipient and agitating with an agitator;adding the sugar cane bagasse into the recipient and waiting for about 10 minutes to obtain a first mixture;slowing adding a solution of caustic soda to the recipient to obtain a second mixture;adjusting a rotation of the agitator so as to maintain a homogeneous solution of the second mixture during gelatinization;waiting for about 20 minutes for full gelatinization;adding into the recipient a second water and waiting for about 10 minutes to obtain a third mixture;switching off the agitator after 10 minutes;protecting the third mixture from contaminations; andafter preparing the third mixture, checking a concentration using of the third mixture via a refractometer.

9. A depressor in iron ore flotation, comprising: sugar cane bagasse; NaOH; andwater;wherein a weight ratio of the sugar cane bagasse to the NaOH is in a range from 6:1 to 10:1.

10. A method of assisting iron ore floatation in a suspension comprising iron ore, the method comprising: adding a depressor to the suspension including iron ore, wherein the depressor comprises sugar cane bagasse.

11. A process of preparing a depressor in iron ore flotation, comprising: measuring a mass of a first amount of sugar cane bagasse;drying the first amount of the sugar cane bagasse in a hothouse after the measuring;measuring the mass of the first amount of sugar cane bagasse after the drying;calculating a humidity of the sugar cane bagasse based on the mass measured prior to the drying and the mass measured after the drying;calculating a second amount of the sugar cane bagasse and an amount of a caustic soda sufficient to provide a predetermined concentration and a predetermined mass of the depressor based on the calculated humidity;mixing the second amount of the sugar cane bagasse with a first water to obtain a first mixture;adding the calculated amount of the caustic soda to the first mixture to obtain a second mixture; andadding a second water to the second mixture to obtain a third mixture.

12. The process of claim 11, further comprising: calculating an amount of the first water based on the predetermined mass of the depressor, the second amount of the sugar cane bagasse, and the amount of the caustic soda; andcalculating an amount of the second water based on the predetermined mass of the depressor, the second amount for the sugar cane bagasse, the amount of the caustic soda, and the amount of the first water;wherein the mixing includes mixing using the calculated amount of the first water; andwherein the adding includes adding using the calculated amount of the second water.

13. The process of claim 11, further comprising allowing the second mixture to fully gelatinize.

14. The process of claim 11, further comprising agitating during the mixing of the second amount of sugar cane bagasse with the first water, during the adding of the amount of the caustic soda to the first mixture, and during the adding of the second water to the second mixture.

15. The process of claim 11, wherein the caustic soda comprises NaOH.

16. The process of claim 11, further comprising checking a concentration of the third mixture via a refractometer.