Descender with two-way locking lever

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6732833
  • Patent Number
    6,732,833
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 16, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 11, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Thompson, II; Hugh B.
    Agents
    • LaSalle; Carol M.
    • Bozicevic, Field & Francis LLP
Abstract
A descender (10) comprising a base (11) having a connection means (26), a pivotal member (12) pivotally mounted on the base (11) about a pivot axis (1), the pivotal member (12) defining first and second spaced projections (14, 15) for engaging a rope (5), the base (11) defining a stop member (18) and a lever (23) pivotable between first and second end positions, the lever (23) and the pivotal member (12) defining complementary cam surfaces (24) to regulate the distance between the stop member (18) and the second projection (15), a resistance force applied to the rope (5) being at a minimum when the second projection (15) is moved away from the stop member (18) and the lever (23) is located in a mid-position, and is at a maximum when the lever (23) moves towards either end position wherein the rope (5) is pressed between the second projection (15) and a braking surface (22).
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to “descenders” for use in abseiling.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Abseiling is a technique used to descend steep surfaces such as cliff faces and is often used by persons involved in activities such as mountain climbing, canyoning and caving. In order to abseil down a cliff face, one end of a rope is made fast at the top of the cliff and the person making the descent then slides down the rope. The rope is passed either around the body of the person or more usually through a descender attached to a harness worn by the person such that the passage of the rope around the body or through the descender provides sufficient friction to slow the rate of descent to a safe speed.




A descender comprises rope engaging surfaces around and between which the rope travels, along a tortuous path, to provide frictional engagement between the rope and the descender. The rate of descent is normally controlled by holding the free or tail end of the rope to control the tension on the rope where it emerges from the descender and thereby to control the degree of frictional engagement between the rope and the descender which in turn controls the rate of descent.




Descenders used in abseiling vary greatly in performance and complexity, there being a variety of relatively simple devices which rely on frictional engagement between the rope and metal rings or racks about which the rope is wrapped, and a number of more complex descenders which incorporate a braking mechanism which allows the friction between the rope and the descender to be varied other than by simply controlling the free or tail end of the rope. The earliest of these more complex devices had a handle or lever which when operated tended to increase the friction between the descender and the rope. This type of descender was not a great improvement over the more simple devices as the brake was not self-engaging and therefore, if the user was knocked unconscious, he would fall in the same way as the user of the earlier devices.




An improved type of descender was disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,596,314 to the present applicant which provides a descender having a simplicity of construction and operation which was not achieved by earlier prior art descenders. The descender disclosed in that application provided a variable braking action which increased when a handle was released. Therefore if the user was knocked unconscious and released the handle, the user's fall would be braked.




A disadvantage of the descender disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,596,314 is that the actuation and release of the self-engaging brake can in some situations be rather abrupt or jerky. For example, it can be difficult for to inexperienced users to smoothly control the braking action.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,597,052 (also to the present applicant) provided a modification to the descender shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,596,314 comprising a variable braking mechanism operated by a lever which allows the user to smoothly control the braking action and thereby avoid or minimise the jerkiness which can be experienced with the use of this known type of descender.




The present invention provides further safety improvements in descenders, in particular, but not exclusively, to the descender of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,597,052.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides a descender for use in abseiling comprising:




a base having a connection means for connection to a harness or the like:




a pivotal member pivotally mounted on the base about a pivot axis extending generally normal thereto, the pivot axis being spaced from the connection means;




the pivotal member having first and second spaced projections for engaging a rope, the projections both extending generally parallel to the pivot axis with the first projection being disposed generally about the pivot axis and the second projection being located substantially on the opposite side of the pivot axis with respect to the connection means;




the base further having a stop means located adjacent the second projection and a lever pivotal about a pivot extending through or located adjacent to the stop means, one end of the lever defining a handle pivotable in an arcuate path between first and second end positions; and




wherein the pivotal member and the other end of the lever define complementary displacing formations the formations being shaped and configured such that as the lever travels in its arcuate path about the pivot, they regulate the distance between the stop means and the second projection whereby, in use, a rope passing around and between the first and second projections and between the second projection and the braking surface will have a resistance force applied to it which is a minimum when the second projection is moved away from the stop means by actuating the lever to cause the complementary displacing formations to contact one another and thus decrease the braking and friction forces on the rope as it passes between the second projection and the stop means and is at a maximum when the lever moves to either end position of its arcuate path wherein the rope is pressed between the second projection and the braking surface.




A first important advantage of the invention is that the lever is inherently safe as braking is at a maximum if the lever is moved to either extreme end position. Any one panicking would tend to force the lever to one side which would result in maximum braking.




A second advantage is that in manipulating the handle of U.S. Pat. No. 4,596,314 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,597,052, can be difficult when the descender is used to lower heavy loads, particularly loads approaching 500 kg or more. The handle has a short arc of travel and this does not allow continuous control but rather provides somewhat jerky movement of the load. In contrast the lever of the present invention has a greater arc of movement and provides better control adjustments when lowering heavy loads and can be used to control heavier loads of 200 kg or more with relative ease.




In one embodiment the complementary displacing formations comprise a cam surface defined on the other end of the lever and the pivotal member defines a cam follower surface.




The cam surface is typically a relatively thin plate which allows the rope to pass over it. The stop member is preferably co-axial with the pivot and may typically be generally cylindrical. This structure has cost advantages over the forged cam of U.S. Pat. No. 5,597,052. Further it can adjust the distance between the stop member and the second projection effectively reducing the drag/friction on the rope when the lever is in a mid-position.




In an alternative embodiment the cam surface is defined on the pivotal member and the cam follower is locate on the other end of the lever. The cam follower may be an annular ring which is free to rotate about its central axis.




In one embodiment, the pivotal member also has a handle means to selectively pivot the pivotal member relative to the base. In this embodiment in use, a rope passing around and between the first and second projections and between the second projection and the braking surface will have a resistance force applied thereto which is at a minimum when the second projection is selectively moved away from the stop by actuating the handle means, and is at a maximum when the handle means is released and the tension of the rope causes the second projection to bear against the stop and press the rope between the braking surface and the second projection and thereby create an additional braking force.




Preferably, the lever has a retention means at a position spaced from the cam and through which, in use, a tail of the rope passes after emerging from between the second projection and the braking surface so that the lever will move with the tail of the rope and may be actuated by changing the position of the tail of the rope relative to the descender. Preferably, the retention means is in form of a pair of recesses in the lever through which, in use, the tail of the rope is threaded.




Preferably, the first and second projections define sheaves which are fixed relative to the pivotal member.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Preferred forms of the present invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:





FIG. 1

is a top plan view of a first embodiment of the descender with the retention plate in its closed position;





FIG. 2

shows the descender of

FIG. 1

with the retention plate removed;





FIG. 2



a


is a side view of a stop means of the descender of FIG.


2


:





FIG. 3

shows a detailed view of the cam and lever of the variable braking mechanism:





FIG. 4

shows a side elevational view of the descender of FIG.


1


:





FIG. 5

shows a variant of the descender of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 6

shows a top plan view of a second embodiment of the present invention with a top plate removed:





FIG. 7

shows a side elevational view of the descender of

FIG. 6

with the top plate shown;





FIG. 8

shows a similar view to

FIG. 6

with a rope threaded through the descender; and





FIG. 9

shows a side view of a lever of the descender of

FIGS. 6

to


8


.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring to

FIGS. 1-4

, there is shown a descender having a base plate


11


, a pivotal member


12


, and a retention plate


13


.




The pivotal member


12


includes two spaced, sheaves


14


and


15


and is pivotally mounted to the base plate


11


by a pivot arrangement


16


about a pivot axis


1


. The effective centre of the first sheave


14


is either co-axial with, or slightly offset from, the pivot axis


1


.




The pivotal member


12


extends away from the first sheave


14


in a generally opposite direction to the second sheave


15


to provide a lever handle


17


which, when moved in the direction C (refer to

FIG. 2

) with respect to the baseplate


11


, moves the second sheave


15


to a position remote from a stop member


18


of the baseplate


11


.




The baseplate


11


has a bolt


19


spaced from the pivot axis


1


and generally adjacent the second sheave


15


.




The stop member


18


is mounted on the bolt


19


and is


18


cylindrical and co-axial with axle


2


defined by the bolt


19


. The surface of the stop member


18


defines a braking surface


22


against which the second sheave bears (or at least a rope located between the second sheave and the stop surface) when, in use, (refer to FIG.


2


), it is urged in the direction A. The stop member


18


is integral with a lever


23


by which means the stop member


18


is pivoted about the axle


2


. However, because the stop member


18


is co-axial with the axle


2


, pivoting of the lever does not move the braking surface


22


relative to the second sheave


15


.

FIG. 2



a


is a side view of the stop member


18


and the pivoted end of the lever


23


. Towards the top of the cylinder there is a cut out portion


19


extending around the circumference of the cylinder which receives the retention plate


13


when the descender is closed. The lever


23


extends beyond the axle


2


and defines a tip


23




a


forming a planar cam surface


24


shaped like a rounded arrow head. The outer surface of second sheave


15


which faces the cam surface


24


defines a cam follower surface


15




a


(see FIG.


3


), The cam surface interacts with the sheave


15


in the following manner. When the second sheave moves in direction A towards the stop member


18


, the cam follower surface


15




a


of the second sheave contacts the planar cam surface


24


and is prevented from moving further thereby defining a gap G between the braking surface of the stop member and the sheave


15


. The gap G can be varied by pivoting the lever


23


about axle


2


. The gap is greatest when the tip of the lever points towards the sheave, see

FIG. 3

where the lever is shown in phantom and least when the lever points downwards (

FIG. 2

) or upwards, where the cam surface


24


will not, in particular, contact the sheave


15


but will be separated therefrom by the rope


5


. In the interim position shown in dashed lines in

FIG. 3

, small changes in the angle of the lever will vary the gap slightly.




The lever


23


has a rope retention arrangement


25


at a position spaced from the stop member


18


. The retention arrangement


25


is in the form of a pair of recesses


35


,


36


. The first recess


35


is adjacent the stop member


18


and faces away from the base plate


11


. The second recess


36


is spaced from the first recess


35


away from the cylinder


18


and faces in an opposite direction to that of the first recess


35


. The recesses


35


,


36


are formed so that the rope can pass from between the stop member


18


and the second sheave


15


to one side of lever


23


, through the first recess


35


to time other side of the lever


23


, and through the second recess


36


back to the one side of the lever


23


. Further, the recesses


35


,


36


are formed so as to have overhanging positions


37


which, in use, serve to retain the rope in the recesses


35


,


36


whilst allowing for the rope to be selectively disconnected from the lever


23


. In this way, when the tail of the rope is received in the retention ion arrangement


25


and is moved relative to the base plate


11


of the descender


10


, the lever


23


will move therewith so that the additional braking force can be easily controlled.




In an alternative embodiment (not shown) the retention arrangement


25


can be in the form of a clip or ring mounted to the lever


23


at a position spaced from the cam surface


24


and through which the tail of the rope can pass.




The retention plate


13


is pivotable about the same pivot axis


1


as the pivotal member


12


and allows the rope to be inserted into and removed from the descender


10


when in the open position (not shown). When the retention plate


13


is pivoted to a closed position (refer to

FIG. 1

) it covers the gap between the two sheaves


14


and


15


and the gap between the second sheave


15


and the stop member


18


to prevent the rope from accidentally jumping out of the descender during a descent. When in the closed position, a slot


34


the retention plate


13


engages the bolt


19


in a groove formed between the stop member


18


and a nut threadably engaged on the end of the bolt


19


. In this way, the retention plate


13


is securely supported and reduces the tendency for the plate


13


to twist due to side loading of the descender by the rope.




The pivotal member


12


is pivotally connected between the baseplate


11


and the retention plate


13


in a similar way to that described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,596,314 at column 4, lines 25-64. In this way, the effective centre of the first sheave


14


can be moved relative to the cylinder


18


so that the descender


10


can be adjusted to suit different diameter ropes.




The baseplate


11


is provided with an elongated hole


26


by which the descender


10


can be permanently connected to a harness during use, the connection being generally by way of a karabiner. The retention plate


13


is provided with a slot


27


which opens through one side of the plate


13


, the slot


27


being closed off by a closure member


28


pivotally connected to the plate


13


by a rivet


29


and which is biased into the closed position by a spring


30


. To move the retention plate


13


to the closed position, the closure member


28


is pivoted in direction D and the karabiner which is already connected in the hole


26


of the baseplate


11


is passed through the opening in the slot


27


. The closure member


28


is then released to retain the karabiner in the slot


27


. To reopen the descender, the closure member is again depressed in the direction D and the karabiner removed from the slot


27


as the retention plate


13


is pivoted to the open position.




The baseplate


11


and retention plate


13


are also provided with holes


31


,


32


such that the braking action of the descender


10


may be inhibited by passing a karabiner or other suitable device through the hole


31


in the baseplate, the opening


33


in the centre of the second sheave


15


and the hole


32


in the retention plate


13


so as to hold the pivotal member


12


relative to the baseplate


11


, and maintain the second sheave


15


away from the stop member


20


of the baseplate


11


.




During use of the descender


10


, a rope


5


is passed the first sheave


14


between the first and second sheaves


14


,


15


, around the second sheave


15


, between the second sheave


15


and the braking surface


22


of the cylinder, and through the retention arrangement


25


.




A minimum braking force is obtained when the handle is pulled in the direction C towards the base and retention plates


11


,


13


so as to move the second sheave


15


into a position remote from the stop member


18


, and wherein the rope


5


will not contact the braking surface


22


of the stop member


18


. It will be recognised, however, that even under the minimum braking situation described, the speed of travel of the rope through the descender


10


can be controlled by varying the tension on the tail of the rope


5


.




When the handle


17


is released, the tension on the rope


5


and the above described tortuous path of the rope


5


through the descender


10


causes the pivotal member


12


to pivot so that the second sheave


15


is urged into contact with the cam surface


24


or the rope


5


depending on the orientation of the lever


23


.




Further, the lever


23


will be urged by the weight of the rope


5


and the friction of the rope


5


on the braking surface


22


into the position shown in FIG.


2


. In this position of the handle


17


and lever


23


, die rope


5


is pressed between the second sheave


15


and the braking surface


22


of the stop member


18


which will create an additional braking force on the rope


5


and which is preferably sufficient to stop the descent of the user. (

FIG. 2

shows a gap between the rope on the second sheave and the stop member


18


, in practice in the situation described above, the sheave


15


would move in direction A to compress the rope


5


against the stop member


18


).




Since the rope


5


passes through the retention arrangement


25


on the lever


23


, the user can simply move the tail of the rope


5


relative to the descender


10


so as to selectively pivot the lever


23


.




When the tail of the rope


5


and the lever


23


are kept generally parallel to the longitudinal extent of the descender


10


, the additional braking force is maximised. When the tail of the rope


5


is selectively moved laterally away from the descender


10


, the lever


23


will move with the tail of the rope and pivot in the direction F (refer to

FIG. 3

) whereby the cam surface


24


defined by the tip portion


23




a


of the lever will contact the second sheave


15


maintaining a gap G between the sheave


15


′ and the braking surface


22


(refer to FIG.


3


). This gap is typically wider than the rope


5


, and thus releases the rope and effectively reduces the additional braking force.




Importantly, movement of the lever beyond the position shown in phantom in

FIG. 3

in the direction of H will cause the gap G between the sheave and braking surface to diminish thus increasing the braking force. Thus, either end of the lever's arcuate travel about axle


2


results in maximum braking force with the interim middle portion


23


′ providing reduced braking force. This makes the descender inherently safer than existing models as it will brake if pushed to either extreme.




It will be appreciated that the effective movement of the cam surface


24


relative to the second sheave


15


by simply manipulating the tail end of the rope


5


as described above will provide a smooth variation in the additional braking force. In this way the variable braking mechanism


21


allows an inexperienced user to smoothly control the application of the additional braking force and thereby avoid jerky stops and starts which can be experienced when operating the descender


10


with the handle


17


. As such, the variable braking mechanism


21


provides an alternative means of disengaging the self-acting brake which is easier to control than by using the handle


17


, and which does not detract from the ability of the brake to be self-acting in emergency situations. When the descender is used to lower loads, as might be the case in rescue situations, with heavier loads approaching 200 kg, the handle


17


does not provide sufficient travel and adjustment of braking to control the load in a satisfactory manner. However, the lever


23


can be used with a good degree of control with relatively heavier loads of 200 kg, as its arc of travel, is greater than that of the handle and its distance to its pivot point less.





FIG. 5

illustrates an alternative embodiment of the invention in which handle


17


for controlling the pivotable member is dispensed with and all the braking is controlled by lever


23


. This embodiment has cost advantages over the first embodiment and again is inherently safe as the movement of the lever to either extreme maximises the braking forces.





FIGS. 6

to


9


show a yet further descender


100


embodying the present invention. In this embodiment parts which have the same function as those described above in relation to

FIGS. 1

to


5


are given the same reference number with a single apostrophe. The descender


100


has a base plate


11


′, a pivotal member


12


′, and a top plate


13


′ (refer to FIG.


7


). In contrast with the embodiments of

FIGS. 1

to


5


, the top plate is fixed relative to the base plate.




As in the first embodiment, the pivotal member


12


′ includes first and second spaced, sheaves


14


′ and


15


′ and is pivotally mounted to the baseplate


11


′ and top plate


13


′ by a pivot arrangement about pivot axis


1


. In

FIG. 7

parts of the pivotal member which are obscured by other components of the descender are shown in phantom. As in the first embodiment, the effective centre of the first sheave


14


′ is either co-axial with, or slightly offset from, the pivot axis


1


′.




A cylindrical stop member


18


′ is mounted on a bolt


19


′ spaced from the pivotal member. The bolt defines a central axis


2


′. The outer surface of the stop member


18


′ defines a cylindrical braking surface


22


′ against which, in use, a rope may bear as is described in more detail below. A lever


23


′ pivots about the axis


2


′ of the bolt


19


′, i.e. is coaxial with the cylindrical stop member


18


′. Because the stop member


18


′ is co-axial with the bolt, pivoting the lever does not move the braking surface


22


′ relative to the second sheave


15


′.





FIGS. 7 and 9

shows the lever


23


′ in more detail. At the end of the lever adjacent the braking surface


22


′, a cylindrical cam follower


102


having an annular cross-section is mounted on a bolt


104


. The cam follower


102


is free to turn around the bolt. The outer surface of cam follower


102


defines a cam follower surface


102




a


(see FIG.


6


). The bolt


104


projects through an arcuate slot


106


(refer to

FIG. 6

) in the base


11


′. As the lever turns about the axis


2


′ of the bolt


19


′, the cam follower travels along an arcuate path along slot


106


from one end


122


of the slot to the other end


124


. The lever may pivot about the axis


2


′ through roughly 90° each side from the position shown in FIG.


6


. At each extreme end position, the lever is roughly parallel to the longest axis of the base plate.




With reference to

FIG. 9

, in the described embodiment, which is a prototype, the lever is made up of three plates


108


,


110


,


112


which are held together with screws


114


. Both the lower and upper plates


108


and


112


define holes


116


,


118


through with the bolt


19


′ passes by means of which the lever


23


′ is pivoted to the base


11


′. The lower plate extends beyond the upper plate and its end defines a hole


16


′ for receiving the bolt


104


on which the cam follower is mounted. The middle plate


110


is co-planar with, and terminates near, the base


11


′. It is envisaged that the lever will be made in one piece, in production.




Turning to

FIG. 6

, it can be seen that the pivotal member


12


′ defines a cam surface


120


facing the cam follower surface


102




a.






In the first embodiment of the present invention the descender included a retention plate which could be pivoted to allow rope to be inserted into the descender and securely retained therein. In the embodiment of

FIGS. 6

to


9


, insertion and retention of the rope is assisted by a lever


130


. One end of the lever is pivoted to the base


11


′ about a post


131


defining a pivot axis


3


. The other free end defines a post


132


mounted on that end of the lever. As seen in

FIG. 8

, in use, a rope R entering the descender passes by posts


131


and


132


and these help retain the rope in the descender and also increases the resistance to the rope passing through the descender. To engage a rope in the descender the rope is looped around the post


132


, the lever pivots away from the base


11


′ to allow this (refer to

FIG. 6

) and the loop is then looped around sheave


15


′.




The top and bottom plates define co-axial elongated holes


26


′ by which the descender


100


can be permanently connected to a harness during use, the connection, being generally by means of a karibiner.




When a rope is correctly threaded through the descender in use as is illustrated in

FIG. 8

, the pivotal member is biased to turn about pivot axis


1


in a direction which urges the second sheave towards the braking surface


22


. When the lever is in or near a mid-position as shown in

FIG. 6

, the cam follower


102


maintains a relatively large gap


9


between the braking surface


22


and the sheave


15


′. However as the lever moves towards either end extremity as the cam follower moves to either end


122


or


124


of the arcuate slot, the pivotal member pivots about axis


1


moving the sheave


15


′ towards the braking surface


22


and compressing the rope passing between the sheave


15


′ and the braking surface


22


.




Again with this descender, in operation the braking on the rope is a maximum when the lever is moved to either end of its arc of travel. This is inherently safer than previous descenders, particularly in the case of novices who may use the descender and become panicked, as their reflex action typically would be to move the lever to either one of its two extreme positions which would result in maximum braking being applied to the rope.




It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the invention as shown in the specific embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as broadly described. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.



Claims
  • 1. A descender for use in abseiling comprising:a base having a connection means for connection to a harness; a pivotal member pivotally mounted on the base about a pivot axis extending generally normal thereto, the pivot axis being spaced from the connection means; the pivotal member having first and second spaced projections for engaging a rope, the projections both extending generally parallel to the pivot axis with the first projection being disposed generally about the pivot axis and the second projection being located substantially on the opposite side of the pivot axis with respect to the connection means; the base further having a generally cylindrical stop member defining a braking surface located adjacent the second projection and a lever defining a first end, and a second end, the lever being pivotal about a pivot extending through or located adjacent to the stop member, the first end of the lever defining a handle pivotable in an arcuate path between first and second end positions; and wherein the pivotal member and the other end of the lever define complementary displacing formations the formations being shaped and configured such that as the lever travels in its arcuate path about the pivot, they regulate the distance between the stop member and the second projection whereby, in use, a rope passing around and between the first and second projections and between the second projection and the braking surface will have a resistance force applied to it which is a minimum when the second projection is moved away from the stop member by actuating the lever to cause the complementary displacing formations to contact one another, thus decreasing the braking and friction forces on the rope as it passes between the second projection and the stop member and is at a maximum when the lever moves towards either end position of its arcuate path wherein the rope is pressed between the second projection mid the braking surface.
  • 2. The descender as claimed in claim 1 wherein the complementary displacing formations comprise a cam surface defined on the other end of the lever and a cam follower surface defined by the pivotal member.
  • 3. The descender as claimed in claim 2 wherein the cam surface is defined by a relatively tin plate above which the rope may pass.
  • 4. The descender as claimed in claim 1 wherein the complementary displacing formations comprise a cam surface defined on the pivotal member and a cam follower defined on the other end of the lever.
  • 5. The descender as claimed in claim 1 wherein the pivotal member also defines a handle member to selectively pivot the pivotal member relative to the base wherein, in use, a rope passing around and between the first and second projections and between the second projection and the braking surface will have a resistance force applied thereto which is at a minimum when the second projection is selectively moved away from the stop by actuating the handle member, and is at a maximum when the handle member is released and the tension of the rope causes the second projection to bear against the stop and press the rope between the braking surface and the second projection and thereby create an additional braking force.
  • 6. The descender as claimed in claim 1 wherein the lever defines a retention means through which, in use, a tail of the rope passes after emerging from between the second projection and the braking surface so that the lever will move with the tail of the rope and may be actuated by changing the position of the tail of the rope relative to the descender.
  • 7. The decender as claimed in claim 1 wherein the first and second projections define sheaves which are fixed relative to the pivotal member.
  • 8. A descender for use in abseiling comprising:a base having a connection means for connection to a harness; a pivotal member pivotally mounted on the base about a pivot axis extending generally normal thereto, the pivot axis being spaced from the connection means; the pivotal member having first and second spaced projections for engaging a rope, the projections both extending generally parallel to the pivot axis with the first projection being disposed generally about the pivot axis and the second projection being located substantially on the opposite side of the pivot axis with respect to the connection means; the base further having a stop member defining a braking surface located adjacent the second projection and a lever having a first end and a second end, the lever being pivotal about a pivot extending through or located adjacent to the stop member, the first end of the lever defining a handle pivotable in an arcuate path between first and second end positions; and wherein the pivotal member and the second end of the lever define complementary displacing formations, a cam surface defined on the pivotal member and a cam follower surface defined on a cam follower at the second end of the lever, the cam surface comprising a relatively thin plate over which the rope may pass, the formations being shaped and configured such that as the lever travels in its arcuate path about the pivot, they regulate the distance between the stop member and the second projection whereby, in use, a rope passing around and between the first and second projections and between the second projection and the braking surface will have a resistance force applied to it which is a minimum when the second projection is moved away from the stop member by actuating the lever to cause the complementary displacing formations to contact one another, thus decreasing the braking and friction forces on the rope as it passes between the second projection and the stop member and is at a maximum when the lever moves towards either end position of its arcuate path wherein the rope is pressed between the second projection and the braking surface.
  • 9. The descender as claimed in claim 8 wherein the cam follower is generally cylindrical.
  • 10. The descender as claimed in claim 9 wherein the cam follower is co-axial with a bolt which projects through an arcuate slot, the arcuate slot defining extreme end positions of travel for the cam follower.
  • 11. A descender for use in abseiling comprising:a base having a connection means for connection to a harness; a pivotal member pivotally mounted on the base about a pivot axis extending generally normal thereto, the pivot axis being spaced from the connection means; the pivotal member having first and second spaced projections for engaging a rope, the projections both extending generally parallel to the pivot axis with the first projection being disposed generally about the pivot axis and the second projection being located substantially on the opposite side of the pivot axis with respect to the connection means; the base further having a stop member located adjacent the second projection and a lever having a first end and a second end pivotal about a pivot extending through or located adjacent to the stop member, the stop member defining a braking surface the first end of the lever defining a handle pivotable in an arcuate path between first and second end positions; and wherein the pivotal member and the second end of the lever define complementary displacing formations, a cam surface defined on the second end of the lever and a cam follower surface defined by the pivotal member, the cam surface comprising a relatively thin plate over which the rope may pass, the formations being shaped and configured such that as the lever travels in its arcuate path about the pivot, they regulate the distance between the stop member and the second projection whereby, in use, a rope passing around and between the first and second projections and between the second projection and the braking surface will have a resistance force applied to it which is a minimum when the second projection is moved away from the stop member by actuating the lever to cause the complementary displacing formations to contact one another, thus decreasing the braking and friction forces on the rope as it passes between the second projection and the stop member and is at a maximum when the lever moves towards either end position of its arcuate path wherein the rope is pressed between the second projection and the braking surface, wherein the pivotal member defines a second handle to selectively pivot the pivotal member relative to the base wherein, in use, a rope passing around and between the first and second projections and between the second projection and the braking surface will have a resistance force applied thereto which is at a minimum when the second projection is selectively moved away from the stop by actuating the handle means, and is at a maximum when the handle means is released and the tension of the rope causes the second projection to bear against the stop and press the rope between the braking surface and the second projection and thereby create an additional braking force.
  • 12. The descender of claim 11 wherein the lever defines a retention means at a position spaced from the cam surface and trough which, in use, a tail of the rope passes after emerging from between the second projection and the braking surface so that the lever will move with the tail of the rope and may be actuated by changing the position of the tail of the rope relative to the descender.
  • 13. The descender of claim 12, wherein the retention means comprises a pair of recesses in the lever through which, in use, the tail of the rope is threaded.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
PQ4672 Dec 1999 AU
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of PCT/AU00/01535, filed Dec. 14, 2000.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/AU00/01535 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO01/43830 6/21/2001 WO A
US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
5054577 Petzl et al. Oct 1991 A
5076400 Petzl et al. Dec 1991 A
5597052 Rogleja Jan 1997 A
5954153 Rogelja Sep 1999 A
5975243 Lorbek Nov 1999 A
6029777 Rogelja Feb 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
19520860 Jun 1995 DE
398-819 May 1989 EP