The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for keeping a pair of contacts closed as they conduct current in a wide range of levels. The invention incorporates features that act independently of the current level, proportionally to the current level, and proportionally to the square of the current level. Those three levels of control allow a designer greater flexibility when creating a system that protects a pair of contacts from opening unexpectedly. The contact assembly of the invention is particularly useful in remote controlled devices where one pair of contacts is not intended to interrupt a short-circuit event. Specific examples of such applications include circuit breakers, relays, contactors, and breaker accessories that are used for lighting control.
The present invention incorporates a “blow closed” loop that prevents the separation of contacts in the contact assembly during short circuits. The contact assembly of the present invention utilizes a grouping from the following elements to prevent the contacts from separating during abnormal current conditions:
1. A compression spring.
2. A magnetic yoke and armature functioning as an electromagnet.
3. A shaping of conductive elements such that two parallel paths of current are drawn across one another.
The spring prevents the contacts from blowing apart during lower amperages. In a typical case, the spring is effective in reducing blow-open from 1 ampere to approximately 600 amperes. In the present invention, the spring may be used to provide approximately 0.5 pounds force at the contact surface. That force is adequate to keep the contacts closed during normal operation and provided the force needed to keep the contacts in one of the two stable positions (i.e., open and closed). The inventors have found, however, that a spring exerting 0.5 pounds force is insufficient to keep the contacts closed during a short circuit, even in combination with a parallel conductor element.
In general, there is a contact separation force Fc that is proportional to the square of the current that is attempting to rotate an arm of length L3 about the point A. The force Fc is a result of repulsion forces at the contact points. A spring (not shown) may provide a force Fs that counteracts the force Fc in order to “blow” the contacts closed and maintain static equilibrium. It should be noted that if Fs>Fc, no motion will occur (although this is not illustrated by the free body diagram of
A magnetic yoke and armature combination may also be used to reduce “blow apart” of the contacts. By adding a yoke and armature to the mechanism associated with a pair of contacts, a magnetic circuit is created through the yoke and armature to keep the contacts closed during a short circuit.
A contact assembly relying on a spring and a magnet to counteract separation forces at the contacts has several limitations. First, the magnetic field associated with the yoke and armature requires substantial current to saturate, and there is a risk that blow-off (i.e., when Fm is small and Fc>Fs) will occur before the magnet can saturate. Before saturation of the magnet, the current flowing through the contacts tends to separate the contacts, while the spring is essentially the only force urging the contacts closed, because the magnet will not yet be generating a large magnetic force. Before saturation of the magnet, the scenario therefore resembles the force diagram of
The risk of contact blow-off may be further elevated by the use of a low-force spring (Fs is very small). Low-force springs may be used in a contact assembly design to reduce overall package size, to decrease switching forces and to control wear on contacts and other components. With a small spring force Fs, less current is required to generate the scenario where Fc>Fs and motion could begin. Therefore, in the case of moderate currents where a magnet/armature arrangement is not saturated, there is a need for a system that improves upon the case where only a spring and magnet are used.
Another limitation of a spring and magnet design appears at very high currents. The separation force generated at the contacts is proportional to the square of the current passing through the contacts. Electromagnets, however, reach a point of saturation beyond which their incremental force generation is proportional only to current. There is therefore always a current level at which the separation force Fc will exceed the force Fm of the magnet plus the force Fs of the spring, and at which the contacts will blow open.
To overcome those limitations, the inventors have incorporated an additional element in the blow-closed contact assembly of the invention. Specifically, a parallel conductor arrangement has been added to improve the performance of the blow-closed function of the assembly.
As is known in the art, current traveling along adjacent conductors in the same direction tends to attract the conductors toward one another by the generation of electromagnetic forces. Current flowing in opposite directions through adjacent conductors tends to generate repulsive electromagnetic forces. As described in more detail below, such electromagnetic forces are applied in the present invention to the moveable conductor and, in cooperation with the spring force and the force of the electromagnet, resist the unintended opening of the contact assembly during fault conditions when the current flow could otherwise urge the contact assembly to open due to repulsion forces at the contact points.
The use of parallel conductors serves several functions. First, in those embodiments of the invention in which current flows in the same direction in the parallel paths, the added fixed conductor effectively adds a second turn to above-described electromagnet. The two parallel conductors each contribute to the magnetic field created in the yoke. The second turn therefore reduces the current required to saturate the magnet by about one-half. By cutting the saturation current level in half, the inventive design effectively achieves a higher closing force at a lower current level. That ensures that the contacts will remain closed over a wider current range during short circuits, including the lower current ranges discussed above as problematic with a spring-plus-magnet-only design.
Another function of the parallel conductors is to add a secondary, non-saturating force that maintains the contacts closed. As noted above, the contact separation force increases with the square of the current passing through the contacts. As further discussed above, the electromagnet has a threshold where the force per unit of current is maximized. Therefore there is a threshold where the magnet can no longer resist the blow-off force. The parallel current paths used in the present invention, however, exert forces on one another that are proportional to the square of the current and proportional to the length over which the parallel conductors are acting. That force, when combined with a properly sized spring and magnet, scales with the contact blow-off force and keeps the contacts closed.
The force Fp-p, between the two current-carrying conductors may be described by the following relationship:
where Θ is an angle between the conductors.
The present invention has significant advantages over a contact assembly having only a spring and parallel conductors to counteract the repulsive forces at the contacts. Parallel conductors are highly sensitive to the gap, the force Fp-p being proportional to the reciprocal of the gap distance d between the parallel conductors. The force Fp-p is also sensitive to the length of the parallel conductors. In situations where design constraints require a minimum gap to be maintained or where substantial length (L5-L4) is not available, the parallel conductors may fail to keep the contacts closed in the case of moderate levels of current.
The contact assembly of the present invention achieves its required function in a small package area and without the use of a large spring or large motion. The small package is desirable because space is always a consideration in the design of circuit breakers packages. The use of a lower force spring over a short distance is desired because it reduces the work required to turn the device on and off. That reduction in work, in turn, lowers friction, decreases wear, and reduces the size of the required remote operation actuator.
Based upon that concept, several specific variations of the physical layout are discussed below with reference to
In each of the illustrated embodiments, the parallel conductor blow-closed region is also the position where the electromagnet is located. The components of the electromagnet are not shown in the schematic representations of
In some of the forms illustrated in
The section 515 of the fixed conductor 514 faces the section 516 of the moveable conductor 511 across a gap 519. A braided conductor 517 conducts current through the sections 515, 516 such that electromagnetic forces are created that urge the moveable contact 512 against the fixed contact 513. In the particular geometry of the arrangement 510, the flow of current through sections 515, 516 is in opposite directions, creating a repulsive force between the conductors 514, 511.
Similarly, in the arrangement 520 shown in
The arrangement 530 shown in
The fixed conductor 534 of arrangement 530 is U-shaped, thereby defining a pocket 534a. That shape of the fixed conductor 534 provides an attachment point for the braided conductor 537 that reduces a parasitic magnetic field that is otherwise created by current flowing through the braided conductor. The pocket 534a proves a location for the magnetic yoke (not shown) that yields a compact overall package.
Arrangement 540 shown in
The above arrangements illustrate how the concept of parallel conductors is used to provide an increasing contact closing force under increased current loads. When combined with an electromagnet and a spring, the arrangements produce a strong “blow closed” force. In those arrangements in which current flows in the same direction in both parallel conductors, i.e., arrangements 530, 550 and 560, current flow in the moveable conductor additionally provides an additional “turn” in the electromagnet, with the above-described advantages.
A preferred embodiment of the invention is now described with reference to
Referring to
As shown in
The configuration of contact assembly 600 permits electrically connecting all conducting components using only a single braided wire. Prior designs required at least one additional braid connecting, for example, output connection tabs.
Returning to
Parallel current flow takes place between the moveable contact 620 and the upper leg 667 of the fixed contact 660. A conducting surface 666 of the upper leg 667 is in close proximity to a similar conducting surface 966 of the moveable conductor 620 (see
A magnetic yoke 650 (
The slot 668 locates and retains the yoke 650 in position. The slot 668 therefore avoids the need for a secondary method of holding the yoke in position.
An armature 655 is placed on top of the moveable conductor 620 and mechanically secured in place by a simple brazing or welding operation. When a magnetic field is created in the yoke 650, it attracts the armature 655, thereby biasing the moveable contact 625 against the fixed contact 695. Both the armature 655 and yoke 650 are magnetic material such as iron, steel or another ferromagnetic material.
A spring 610 additionally biases the contacts 625, 695 together. In the contact assembly 600, the spring acts in a direction approximately 90 degrees from the direction of force between the contacts, and is transmitted by the spring-loaded portion 630 through a pivot to the contact 625.
The foregoing detailed description is to be understood as being in every respect illustrative and exemplary, but not restrictive, and the scope of the invention disclosed herein is not to be determined from the description of the invention, but rather from the claims as interpreted according to the full breadth permitted by the patent laws. For example, while the contact assembly is described herein with reference to particular geometric configurations, many such configurations are possible as demonstrated by the examples of
This application claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/830,533 entitled “Design and Method for Keeping Electrical Contacts Closed During Short Circuits,” filed on Jul. 13, 2006, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60830533 | Jul 2006 | US |