The present invention relates to electronic circuitry and, in particular, to a voltage tolerant circuit with improved latchup suppression.
Signal Latchup deals with a silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR). However, the behavior is different from standard latchup in that the current monitored is from the I/O signal pad. During Signal Latchup, the anode is connected to the signal pin, whereas during standard latchup the anode is connected to the power supply; therefore, an additional latchup effect is possible if current into the signal pin is monitored. The design of voltage tolerant electro static discharge (ESD) protection can lead to Signal Latchup effects.
The primary prior art ESD protection structure used for a voltage tolerant signal pin is made up of cascode NMOS transistors M1 and M2 from the signal pad 20 to node Vss, and a series of at least 2 pn diodes from the signal pad 20 to the power supply VDD, as shown in
Since there are a series of at least 2 diodes involved, node A in
From the Signal Latchup point of view, if current is pulled out of a neighboring pin while there is sufficient voltage applied across the parasitic SCR, high impedance node A can easily be pulled down to a base-emitter voltage (Vbe) and trigger the parasitic SCR which clamps the pad to node Vss. This results in destructive signal pin current that would go undetected during normal latchup testing where only the current at node VDD is monitored.
Since the neighboring pin plays an important role during Signal Latchup, the distance between the neighboring cell and the parasitic SCR cell is critical.
In application systems where Signal Latchup is present, the holding current depends on the input current that an external driver can provide. Also, the input voltage in the application plays a role. If the input/output (I/O) cell changes the input voltage to be below the holding voltage of the parasitic SCR then the I/O pin will not sustain the Signal Latchup. In order to activate the parasitic SCR with anode connected to I/O, a current pulse is needed in the neighboring cell when the input is connected to a voltage higher than the holding voltage of the parasitic SCR (High level in digital signal).
If the I/O is directly connected to a power supply source then it could result in a destructive failure. On the other hand, if it is connected to a bus, the failure could result from unexpected behavior of the system due to bus contention. In the latter case it could cause damage to the other IC's sharing the same bus on the system board.
Failure Mode: Due to Signal Latchup, the SCR appears with the anode connected to the I/O instead of coming from a power supply. This behavior depends on the trigger current from an adjacent cell.
The primary ESD protection structure used for a voltage tolerant signal pin with series PN diodes from the signal pad to the power supply could play an important role due to the parasitic SCR. Therefore, the layout and/or dimensions of the ESD NMOS and diode circuit are directly related to the Signal Latchup performance.
A voltage tolerant circuit with improved latchup suppression includes: a diode device having a first end coupled to a source voltage node; a first NWELL guard ring surrounding the diode device; a diode coupled between a second end of the diode device and an output pad; a second NWELL guard ring surrounding the diode; and a transistor device coupled between the output pad and a substrate node. The NWELL guardrings disrupt the parasitic SCR operation by adding an additional N+ diffusion without affecting the substrate pump current delivered by the diode.
In the drawings:
To improve the Signal Latchup robustness, the parasitic SCR from Pad to node Vss, as shown in
A solution is required to effectively balance the trade-offs between ESD and Signal Latchup robustness. In the preferred embodiment circuit shown in
While this invention has been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications and combinations of the illustrative embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description. It is therefore intended that the appended claims encompass any such modifications or embodiments.
This application claims priority under 35 USC § 119 (e) (1) of provisional application No. 60/520,132 filed Nov. 14, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5945713 | Voldman | Aug 1999 | A |
5959820 | Ker et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6858902 | Salling et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6965504 | Liu et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050104154 A1 | May 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60520132 | Nov 2003 | US |