1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to wireless communication. In particular, the present invention relates to sharing a spectrum among many wireless users to improve efficiency.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
Various spectrum-sharing methods exist for increasing the efficiency or flexibility of spectrum usage, while decreasing the impact of interference. These methods are described, for example, in:
(a) U.S. Pat. No. 5,907,812, entitled “Method and Arrangement for Spectrum Sharing in a Radio Communication Environment,” to P. H. G. Van de Berg, issued on May. 25, 1999, discloses a method for flexible coexistence of several radio systems based on spectrum sensing. The method does not use a multiplexing method, but avoids channels that are being used.
(b) U.S. Pat. No. 5,412,658, entitled “Beacon Detection Method and Apparatus for Sharing Spectrum Between Wireless Communications Systems and Fixed Microwave Systems,” to H. W. Arnold, D. M. Devasirvathan, N. R. Sollenberger, L. G. Sutliff, and V. K. Varma, issued on May 2, 1995, discloses a spectrum sharing method for point-to-point and time division multiple access (TDMA) systems that is based on beacon detection.
(c) European Patent Application Publication, EP1220557A1, entitled “Communication System and Method of Sharing a Communication Resource,” by C. Faure, D. Calin, and T. L. Lee, filed on Dec. 29, 2000, discloses a method for dynamically sharing frequencies, both proprietary and shared, that is based on a detect-and-avoid (DAA) mechanism.
(d) U.S. Patent Application Publication, 2005/0095986, entitled “Spectrum Sharing in the Unlicensed Band,” by A. Hassan, P. Bahl, J. P. de Vries, filed on Oct. 30, 2003 and published on May 5, 2005, discloses a method for autonomous interferer detection and adaptation.
(e) U.S. Pat. No. 5,448,754, entitled “Radio Frequency Sharing Personal Communications System,” to C. M. P. Ho, and J. D. Lockton, filed Jan. 6, 1994, and issued on Sep. 5, 1995, discloses a frequency allocation scheme that is based on real-time interference sensing.
(f) U.S. Pat. No. 5,548,809, entitled “Spectrum Sharing Communication System and System for Monitoring Available Spectrum,” to P. H. Lemson, issued on Aug. 20, 1996, discloses a dynamic frequency allocation technique that is based on a deployed signal-level monitoring system.
(g) U.S. Pat. No. 5,497,503, entitled “Method for Assigning Frequency Channels in a Cellular Communication System and for Identifying Critical Existing Fixed Microwave Receivers that Restrict Operation of Such a System,” to J. T. Rydberg, and K. B. Hallman issued on Mar. 5, 1996, discloses a method for assigning frequency channels to base stations in a cellular communication system that is based on receiver clustering.
(h) U.S. Pat. No. 5,805,633, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Frequency Planning in a Multi-system Cellular Communication Network,” to J. Uddenfeldt, issued on Sep. 8, 1998, discloses an apparatus for frequency planning in a multi-system network, in which a number of systems operate in multiple frequency bands.
(i) U.S. Pat. No. 7,177,647, entitled “Spectrum Sharing Between Wireless Systems,” by M. Goldhammer, issued on Feb. 13, 2007, discloses a method for spectrum sharing that is based on time-frame allocation.
(j) U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0286934 A1, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Dynamic Spectrum Sharing,” by S. L. Kuffner, R. L. Peterson, and E. Visotsky, published on Dec. 21, 2006, discloses a technique for dynamic spectrum sharing that is based on node identification and measurement of local signal value.
The following references analyze DAA mechanisms for ultrawideband (UWB) interference mitigation, but do not disclose multiplexing alternatives for spectrum sharing: (k) “Detect and Avoid (DAA) Mechanisms for UWB Interference Mitigation,” by V. Somayazulu, J. Foerster, and R. Roberts, published in IEEE 2006 International Conference on Ultra-Wideband, pp. 513-518, September 2006; (l) “Performance of UWB Systems using a Temporal Detect-and-Avoid Mechanism,” by T. Zasowski, and A. Wittneben, published in IEEE 2006 International Conference on Ultra-Wideband, pp. 495-500, September 2006; (m) “Performance Evaluation of Detect and Avoid Procedures for Improving UWB Coexistence with UMTS and WiMAX systems,” A. Durantini, R. Giuliano, F. Mazzenga, and F. Vatalaro, published in IEEE 2006 International Conference on Ultra-Wideband, pp. 501-506, September 2006; (n) “Interference Mitigation for Coexistence of Heterogeneous Ultra-Wideband Systems”, Y. Zhang, H. Wu, Q. Zhang, and P. Zhang, published in EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2006; (o) “Study of Coexistence between UWB and Narrowband Cellular Systems” M. Mittelbach, C. Muller, D. Ferger, A. Finger, published in Joint International Workshop on Ultra Wideband Systems and International Conference on Ultrawideband Systems and Technologies, pp. 40-44, May 2004.
(p) “Spectrum Pooling: An Inovative Strategy for the Enhancement of Spectrum Efficiency”, by T. A. Weiss, and F. K. Jondral, published in IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 8-14, March 2004, discloses a concept of spectrum pooling which allows secondary utilization of already licensed frequency bands.
(q) “OverDRiVE-Spectrum Efficient Multicast Services to Vehicles”, R. Tönjes, K. Möβner, T. Lohmar, and M. Wolf, published in IST Mobile Summit, Thessaloniki, Greece, June 2002, discloses a hybrid network that ensures spectrum efficient provision of mobile multimedia services and enables interworking of cellular and broadcast networks in a common frequency range with dynamic spectrum allocation.
The prior art methods require that the secondary spectrum users contend for the spectrum when the primary owner of the spectrum is transmitting, and thus do not result in optimal spectrum usage. These methods do not use a multiplexing method to increase the spectral efficiency and thus, reduce the network capacity as less users can be supported by the fixed amount of spectrum. The methods are not flexible, requiring modification of the existing networks or special accommodation by the existing networks.
A wireless communication system and a detect-and-multiplex (DAM) spectrum sharing technique eliminate contention by secondary spectrum users by multiplexing multiple access methods. Suitable multiple access methods include time division multiple access (TDMA), frequency division multiple access (FDMA), code division multiple access (CDMA), space division multiple access (SDMA), orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA), spectral nulling (SN) or a hybrid scheme (HS) based on a combination of two or more of the above techniques. Unlike, DAA methods, the DAM method increases spectrum usage efficiency, and allows more users to share the same region of the spectrum.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a method assigns, initially, a portion of a spectrum for exclusive use by a first user. The first user may then determine if a condition in the portion of the spectrum is favorable to allow one or more other users to communicate over the same portion of the spectrum using a multi-access method. To determine the channel condition, the first user detects the interference-plus-noise power in the portion of the spectrum, and enabling the other users when the interference-plus-noise power exceeds a predetermined threshold. The interference-plus-noise power may be detected using an adaptive scanning method selected from adaptive scanning methods having different update schedules.
The present invention is better understood upon consideration of the detailed description below in the conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The power threshold Pth is a system parameter that is determined at design time, and depends on the power transmitted by each mobile node, the thermal noise power, and the maximum allowable distance between two mobile nodes.
During the spectrum scanning process 500 (see
Alternatively, under slow update mode 504, measure period Tm is longer than the predefined threshold time Tth, and the interference-plus-noise power is measured and updated only intermittently. Slow update mode 504 ensures simpler mobile node hardware and reduced power consumption, at the expense of accuracy and speed in the interferer detection.
In contrast to conventional DAA methods, a DAM method of the present invention does not require that the secondary spectrum users contend for the spectrum channel when the primary user is transmitting. As shown in
A method of the present invention has the advantage that the secondary spectrum users need not contend for the spectrum while the primary user of the spectrum is transmitting. Relative to prior art DAA techniques, a DAM technique of the present invention increases spectrum usage efficiency, allowing more users to share a common region of the spectrum.
The detailed description above is provided to illustrate specific embodiments of the present invention and is not intended to be limiting. Numerous modifications and variations within the scope of the present invention are possible. The present invention is set forth in the following claims.
The present application is related to and claims priority of U.S. provisional patent application (“Provisional Application”), Ser. No. 60/887,529, entitled “Detect-and-Multiplex Technique for Spectrum Sharing,” filed on Jan. 31, 2007. The Provisional Application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60887529 | Jan 2007 | US |