The present disclosure relates to spin stabilized projectiles, and more specifically, to spin stabilized projectiles having a despun control portion.
In various instances, non-boosted barrel-fired projectiles, such as bullets, shells, or other projectiles, are spin-stabilized to improve their accuracy via improved in-flight projectile stability. Generally, these projectiles are fired from a rifled barrel where rifled grooves grip the projectile and force it to spin at a high rate about a central projectile axis as it is pushed down the bore of the barrel by propellant gasses. This process imparts a spin to the projectile as it passes through the bore and, as such, the projectile is stabilized for flight.
Spin stabilized guided projectiles fired from rifled barrels typically have a main body portion and a flight control portion rotatable with respect to the main body. The rifling in the barrel rotates the projectile in a first direction by way of engagement with the main body portion or sabots containing the projectile. Upon firing, the main body portion is spun in a first rotational direction at a spin rate based on rifling and muzzle velocity. In some cases, the spin rate may exceed 10 kHz. The flight control portion of the projectile has aerodynamic surfaces, such as fins, to despin the flight control portion using oncoming airflow after the projectile is fired. The differential in spinning between the flight control portion and the main body portion may provide power for operating systems in the projectile. In some instances, the spin rate of the flight control portion may be generally slowed or braked to 0 Hz, with respect to earth, by a braking system, and have an aerodynamic surface that may be appropriately positioned, that is, positioned in a desired rotational area, for changing the direction of the projectile.
Further improvements are always welcome for enhancing accuracy, allowing miniaturization, increasing range, providing cost savings and improved reliability of guided ammunition.
Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to method, system, and device for projectile body spin detection. In one or more embodiments the projectile includes a nose portion with a forward tip, a body portion, a tail portion, and a central axis. In various embodiment the projectile includes a chassis extending from the tail portion to the nose portion and further defining a collar support portion including a despun collar portion rotationally mounted therein. In various embodiments the despun collar portion is separated axially from the chassis for free despinning of the despun collar portion relative to the chassis and for directional collar of the projectile. In one or more embodiments the despun collar portion is separated axially by a gap between a first face of the despun collar portion and an opposing annular shoulder of the chassis.
As used herein, the terms “despun”, “despin”, “despinning”, or other variant of the term, refers to an object that is spun in a direction about its longitudinal axis that, in some instances, is counter-rotational with another portion of the projectile. However, the terms also include objects that are the only spun or spinning portion of the projectile. For example, in some instances a despun collar refers to a collar that is spinning about its longitudinal axis while a remainder of the projectile has a 0 Hz rotational motion, relative to the earth. As such, the terms “despun” and “spun” or variant of either of these terms are used interchangeably herein.
In one or more embodiments the projectile includes a body-spin detection system. In various embodiments the detection of spin is used to determine the spin rate of one or more portions of the projectile. In addition, in certain embodiments, the body-spin detection system is sued to determine the instances at which one or more portions of the projectile are rotationally oriented in certain positions. For example, in various embodiments the body-spin detection system is configured to detect the rotational orientation of despun collar portion and/or other portion of the projectile about the longitudinal central axis of the projectile during projectile flight.
In addition, one or more embodiments provide a mechanism for body-spin detection compatible for use with a wide variety of projectiles. Installation in various types of legacy designs, or in some instances, retrofitting existing ammunition with embodiments of the present disclosure.
For example, one or more embodiments provide a body-spin detection mechanism that minimizes projectile drag associated with components of the mechanism. As such various embodiments provide a detection system that does not disrupt or otherwise alter projectile trajectory during flight and is compatible with projectiles designed for high velocity ballistic trajectories. In addition, various embodiments provide a body-spin detection mechanism that does not require significant volume inside the body of the projectile. As a result, in various embodiments the mechanism is compatible with various projectile calibers, including medium or small caliber projectiles. In addition, because one or more embodiments provide a body-spin detection mechanism that does not require significant volume inside the body of the projectile, various embodiments are further compatible with projectiles including internal payload or other components requiring internal volume within the projectile.
In addition, various embodiments utilize detection and perturbation elements that can be embedded within surface cavities of the projectile. In various embodiments this provides a minimum of disruption of the projectile aerodynamics. While also allowing the detection and perturbation element to be protected from mechanical damage. For example these elements could be protected by suitable coatings or simply due to a recessed placement within the projectile. In various embodiments the detection electronics are relatively simple and can include wave guiding structures, making the body spin detection system relatively immune to external electromagnetic interference.
As such, in one or more embodiments the body spin detection device includes a detection element mounted in one of the first face of the despun collar portion and the annular shoulder of the chassis, and a perturbing element mounted in the other of the first face and the annular shoulder. In various embodiments the perturbing element and the detection element positioned opposing one another such that the despun collar portion has a first rotational orientation about the central axis where the perturbing element and the detection element are rotationally aligned and a second rotational orientation where the perturbing element and the detection element are rotationally non-aligned.
In various embodiments the body spin detection device includes detection circuitry electrically coupled with the detection element, the detection circuitry including a processor and a computer readable storage medium, the computer readable storage medium including a set of instructions executable by the processor. In various embodiments the set of instructions cause the detection circuitry to receive, via the detection element, a first input signal and determine a first set of signal characteristics for the first input signal and receive, via the detection element, a second input signal and determine a second set of signal characteristics for the second input signal. In certain embodiments the set of instructions further cause the detection circuitry to determine, by comparing the first set of signal characteristics to the second set of signal characteristics, that the first input signal is different from the second input signal and determine a spin rate for at least one of the despun collar portion and the chassis by determining a time period between receiving the first input signal and the second input signal.
The above summary is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the present disclosure.
The drawings included in the present application are incorporated into, and form part of, the specification. They illustrate embodiments of the present disclosure and, along with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure. The drawings are only illustrative of certain embodiments and do not limit the disclosure.
While the embodiments of the disclosure are amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the disclosure to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
As used herein, the term “spin-stabilized” means that the projectile is stabilized by being spun around its longitudinal (forward to rearward) central axis. The spinning mass creates gyroscopic forces that keep the projectile resistant to destabilizing torque in-flight. In addition, projectile stability can be quantified by a unitless gyroscopic stability factor (SG). As used herein, the term “spin-stabilized” additionally refers to projectiles that have a spin rate that is high enough to at least achieve a SG of 1.0 or higher. Additional discussion of gyroscopic stability factor can be found, for example, in U.S. application Ser. No. 15/998,144, titled “Active Spin Control” incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
In one or more embodiments, the projectile 100 includes a main body portion 104, a tail portion 108, and a nose portion 112. A chassis 116 extends from the nose portion 112, defines the main body portion 104, and extends to the tail portion 108. The chassis 116 is, in some embodiments, machined or formed from a single block of metal. In some embodiments, the chassis 116 includes a control support portion 120 for supporting a despun control portion 124, which is discussed further below.
In one or more embodiments, the main body portion 104 provides a structure for containing and/or supporting various elements of the projectile 100 including payload and operational components. In certain embodiments, the main body portion 104 has a cylindrical shape or a generally cylindrical shape defined by a main body sidewall 128. In some embodiments, the main body sidewall 128 may be part of the chassis 116 as illustrated, or there may be an additional wall or surface exterior of the chassis 116. In various embodiments the main body portion 104 has an exterior surface 132, a forward portion 136 and a rearward portion 140.
In some embodiments, the main body sidewall 128 includes one or more tapered portions that converge in a direction along a central axis 144. For example, in some embodiments a first portion, such as the forward portion 136 including some or all of the main body sidewall 128 converges in a forward direction, along central axis 144, towards the nose portion 112. In some embodiments, a second portion, such as the rearward portion 140 including some or all of the main body sidewall 128, could converge in a rearward direction towards the tail portion 108.
In one or more embodiments the chassis 116 defines, at the tail portion 108, the control support portion 120. In various embodiments, the control support portion 120 is a structure that is unitary or integral with the chassis 116 for supporting various components of the projectile 100. In one or more embodiments, the control support portion 120 includes an axially projecting central stub portion for supporting the despun control portion 124 and other elements of the projectile 100. For example, in various embodiments, the central stub portion supports components for internal power generation, braking components, or other components of the projectile 100. In certain embodiments, communication componentry, sensing components, processing components, or other components of the projectile 100 may be located within the control support portion 120, for example, within a cavity formed within the central stub portion.
While various embodiments of the disclosure refer to a control support portion 120, it is intended that the term can alternatively/interchangeably be referred to as a collar support portion. For example, where the despun control portion is referred to as a despun collar portion, described further below.
The nose portion 112 is a forward facing (e.g. in the first direction) structure and has a tapered or a converging shape. The nose portion 112 extends from the forward portion 136 of the main body portion 104, forwardly, in a first direction, along central axis 144 to a forward tip portion 148. In various embodiments, nose portion 112 has an exterior surface 152 and may be conical or have a curved taper from the forward portion 136 of the main body portion 104 to the forward tip portion 148.
In various embodiments, projectile 100 is a medium or high caliber spin-stabilized projectile for firing from a rifled barrel or gun. For example, in certain embodiments, projectile 100 is a 57 mm (millimeter) medium caliber round. In some embodiments, projectile 100 is a 90 mm large caliber round. In certain embodiments, projectile 100 is a small caliber round. As used herein, a medium caliber projectile includes rounds greater than 50 caliber up to about 75 mm, a large caliber projectile includes rounds greater than 75 mm, and small caliber projectiles include rounds less than 50 caliber.
In some embodiments, the main body portion 104 can include a plurality of lift strakes. In one or more embodiments, lift strakes are aerodynamic ridges or fins extending from the main body portion 104 or other portion of the spin-stabilized projectile 100.
In some embodiments, the main body portion 104 of the projectile 100 includes a crimped portion and a band for coupling with a casing of a cartridge. The crimped portion may include various indentations in the chassis 116 that allow for a secure connection between the chassis 116 and the casing of a cartridge. In certain embodiments, the band is constructed of material such as nylon, plastic, copper, or other suitable material and allows for a secure sealing engagement with a rifled barrel of a gun for firing.
In one or more embodiments, portions of the despun control portion 124 are rotatably mounted to the control support portion 120 and are independently rotatable for despinning with respect to the chassis 116, the main body portion 104, the nose portion 112, and the control support portion 120. In one or more embodiments, the components of the despun control portion 124 include a flight control portion, configured as a collar 156.
In one or more embodiments, the collar 156 of the despun control portion 124 includes a plurality of aerodynamic control surfaces and structures disposed on an external wall. For example, as seen in
In one or more embodiments, the despun control portion 124 includes various components of the spin-stabilized projectile 100. For example, the despun control portion 124 may include components for generating power or electricity in the spin-stabilized projectiles 100. In some embodiments the despun control portion 124 includes power-generation components such as a ring cluster of magnets aligned with a corresponding ring of armature coils, a hydraulic pump electricity generating means, or other power generating components. In some embodiments, the despun control portion 124 includes a battery or other power storage components.
While various embodiments of the disclosure refer to a despun control portion 124, it is intended that the term can alternatively/interchangeably be referred to as a despun collar portion.
In operation, the projectile 100 can be loaded into a projectile delivery system, such as a gun with a rifled barrel, and fired. The projectile 100 may be fired at various muzzle velocities and at various muzzle spin rates based on the propellant used and the design (e.g. rifling) of the projectile delivery system. For example, in one or more embodiments, the projectile 100 is fired having an initial spin rate of 1300 Hz±100 Hz. In various embodiments, when fired, the initial spin rate of the projectile 100 is substantially within the range of 800 Hz-2000 Hz.
In various embodiments, when fired, the interaction of the aerodynamic control surfaces with oncoming wind or air cause the despun control portion 124 to despin relative to the main body portion 104, the nose portion 112, and the control support portion 120. In various embodiments the spin rate of the despun control portion 124 causes a relative rotation of the power-generation components for powering the components of the projectile 100.
In one or more embodiments, when fired, the spin rate of the despun control portion 124 is about 1300 Hz±100 Hz. In some embodiments, when fired, the spin rate of the despun control portion 124 is substantially within the range of 800 Hz-2000 Hz.
In operation, the despun control portion 124 is configured for resistive breaking, using power-generation components to control the spin rate of the despun control portion 124 and/or the spin rate of the remainder of the projectile 100. For example, in some embodiments resistive breaking may be used to control the spin rate of the despun control portion 124 to approximately 0 Hz relative to the earth. In some embodiments, the resistive braking could be used to completely brake the despin of the despun control portion 124 with respect to the chassis 116. In certain embodiments, resistive braking may be used to slow but not stop the despin of the despun control portion 124 with respect to the chassis 116. For example, resistive braking could be configured to brake the spin rate of the collar to some percentage of the spin rate of a fully unbraked collar.
Spin rate control of a projectile using a despun control portion is discussed further in U.S. application Ser. No. 15/998,114, titled “Active Spin Control”, incorporated by reference above.
By controlling the spin rate, the despun control portion 124 may be used to provide a moment or maneuvering force on the projectile 100 for altering trajectory, speed, or other flight characteristics of the spin-stabilized projectile 100. For example, in one or more embodiments, by controlling the spin rate the despun control portion 124 may be used to control the orientation of the flap 164 or other aerodynamic control surfaces to act as a foil for aerodynamically providing a moment on the projectile 100. As such, the orientation of the projectile 100 can be torqued by the moment or maneuvering force to control the in-flight trajectory of the projectile 100.
As a consequence of the ability to control the in-flight trajectory of the projectile 100, in various embodiments, the despun control portion 124 extends the effective range of the projectile 100 by using the despun control portion 124 to compensate for various environmental/in-flight factors that influence the projectile off its originally aimed path and to otherwise steer the projectile to its target.
Referring to
As described above, in various embodiments the main body portion 104 and the control support portion 120 can be a chassis for supporting various components of the projectile 100. For example, in some embodiments, main body portion 104 includes cavity 204 and control support portion 120 includes cavity 208 for containing various componentry circuitry, or other elements of the projectile 100. For example, in one or more embodiments, cavities 204, 208, can include various computer circuitry, such as a processor, computer readable storage medium, sensors, or other components or circuitry. For example, cavities 204, 208, may include a processor portion 212, a transceiver portion 216 which may include one or more transceivers for communication with other projectiles or a firing platform, a sensor portion 220 such as for tracking targets and receiving signals, and body spin detection circuitry 222 as part of a body spin detection device 224 for determining the body spin rate of the projectile 100, described further below. In some embodiments, the cavity 208 includes components of an alternator or other device that cooperates with power-generation components to generate power in the projectile 100.
The processor portion 212 may include various computer circuitry for a processor, a computer readable storage medium, and other circuitry. As used herein, the computer readable storage medium is a tangible device that retains and stores instructions for use by an instruction execution device (e.g. a processor, or other logic device). In some embodiments, the computer readable storage medium includes, but is not limited to, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), and any suitable combination of the foregoing. A computer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.
In some embodiments, the computer readable storage medium has program instructions embodied therein. In one or more embodiments the program instructions are executable by the processor portion 212 to cause the processor to perform various functions for control of the projectile 100. For example, and described further below, the instructions may cause the processor to determine a spin rate for spin stabilized projectile 100 according to various embodiments of the disclosure.
In some embodiments, cavity 204 is communicatively connected with cavity 208. For example, cavity 204 and 208 may each include various computer circuitry which may be communicatively connected using a bus, one or more wires, or other suitable connection. As such, in various embodiments processor portion 212, transceiver portion 216, sensor portion 220, spin detection circuitry 222, and other elements can be communicatively connected to one another regardless of their placement in one or more of the various internal cavities 204, 208 of the projectile 100.
Referring to
Referring again to
Further, while
In various embodiments the detection circuit 222 is electrically connected to the detection element 236 and may be located inside the same portion of the projectile 100 as the detection element 236. For example, depicted in
As described above, during projectile flight, as a result of the aerodynamic forces on the despun control portion 124, the despun control portion 124 rotates about the control support portion 120 causing a relative rotation of the despun control portion 124 relative to the chassis 116 and about the central axis 144. As a result of the relative rotation of the despun control portion 124 to the chassis 116, the perturbing element 240 in the despun control portion 124 also rotates with respect to the detection element 236 about central axis 144.
As such, in various embodiments, during projectile flight, the detection element 236 and perturbing element 240 will alternate between two states including a first state where the elements 236, 240 are rotationally aligned and a second state where the elements 236, 240 are not rotationally aligned. For example, depicted in
In one or more embodiments, the detection circuit 222, detection element 236, and perturbing element 240 are configured together as an amplitude signal detector or a phase signal detector. As such, in one or more embodiments, in operation, the detection circuit 222 generates an electrical signal in the form of an electromagnetic wave that is transmitted, via electrical connection 244, to the detection element 236. In various embodiments the electrical connection 244 and detection element 236 carry this signal to a portion of the detection element 236 that is located at the outside surface of the annular shoulder 232. In operation, in one or more embodiments, the electrical signal is transmitted outward of the detection element 236, which acts as a waveguide directing the electrical signal from the annular shoulder 232 towards the first face 228 of the despun control portion 124 and perturbing element 240.
As such, in various embodiments, if the perturbing element 240 and detection element 236 are configured in the first state, the perturbing element 240 will receive the electrical signal directed from the detection element 236. However, if the perturbing element 240 and the detection element 236 are configured in the second state, the electrical signal will be directed to a portion of the first face 228 not including the perturbing element 240.
In certain embodiments a portion of the electrical signal may be reflected by the first face 228 of the despun control portion 124 and will reflect back to the detection element 236, through electrical connection 244 and into the detection circuitry 222. In certain embodiments, the perturbing element 240 will also reflect a portion of the electrical signal back to the detection element 236.
In various embodiments, the electronics in the detection circuitry 222 are configured to detect and measure characteristics of this reflected signal. For example, in various embodiments, the detection circuit 222 is configured to detect the amplitude, phase, or other properties of an electromagnetic wave.
In one or more embodiments, the characteristics (e.g. amplitude, phase, etc.) of the reflected electrical signal will differ based on whether the signal is reflected by the first face 228 or is reflected by the perturbing element 240. For example, described further below, in various embodiments the perturbing element 240 includes various features that modify or alter the characteristics of the reflected electric signal as compared to when the signal is reflected by the first face 228. As such, in various embodiments, the reflected electrical signal can act as a reference signal for the detection circuitry 222 where the reference signal possesses a first set of signal characteristics or a second set of signal characteristics that are based on whether the signal was reflected off of the perturbing element 240 or the first face 228, respectively.
As such, in various embodiments the detection circuit 222 is configured to determine the state of rotational orientation of the detection element 236 and the perturbing element 240. For example, if the detection circuit 222 determines that the reference signal has the first set of signal characteristics the detection circuit 236 can determine that the detection element 236 and the perturbing element 240 are configured in the first state (e.g. rotationally aligned). Similarly, if the detection circuit 222 determines that the reference signal has the second set of signal characteristics the detection circuit 222 can determine that the detection element 236 and the perturbing element 240 are configured in the second state (e.g. non-aligned).
As such, in various embodiments the signal characteristics of the reference signal can be used to detect the times at which the perturbing element 240 is aligned with the detection element 236. As such, in various embodiments this information can be used to determine spin rate and/or the rotational orientation of the despun control portion 124 about the central axis 144. For example, because of the aerodynamic despin of the despun control portion 124 during flight, in various embodiments the instances where the detecting circuit 222 detects that the perturbing element 240 is aligned with the detection element 236 will indicate a full rotation of the despun control portion 124 about central axis 144. In certain embodiments, the period of time between each instance of the detecting circuitry 222 detecting that the perturbing element 240 and detection element 236 are aligned can be used to determine the rate or speed of rotation of the despun control portion 124 relative to the chassis 116.
In some embodiments, the perturbing element 240 includes various features such that the perturbing element 240 is configured to substantially absorb the transmitted electrical signal from the detection element 236. In such embodiments, the perturbing element 240 does not cause a reflected signal. In such embodiments, the reflected electrical signal from the first face 228 is used as a reference signal for the detecting circuitry 222, and the lack of a reflected signal indicates that the perturbing element 240 and the detection element 236 are aligned in the first state.
In various embodiments the difference between the instances when the detection circuit 222 detects the reflected signal compared with the instances when the detection circuit fails to detect the reflected signal is used to detect the times at which the perturbing element 240 is aligned with the detection element 236 or not. Similarly, as described above, this information can be used to determine spin rate and/or the rotational orientation of the despun control portion 124 about the central axis 144.
While various embodiments herein describe that the detection element 236 is configured to transmit the electrical signal, in some embodiments the perturbing element 240 can be configured to generate a reference signal for detection by the detecting circuit 222. In such embodiments, the perturbing element 240 is configured as a waveguide such that an electronic reference signal is transmitted outward of the perturbing element 240 from the first face 228 to the annular shoulder 232 of the chassis 116.
As such, in various embodiments, if the perturbing element 240 and detection element 236 are rotationally aligned, configured in the first state, the detection element 236 will receive the electrical signal directed from the perturbing element 240. However, if the perturbing element 240 and the detection element 236 are non-aligned, configured in the second state, the reference signal will instead reflect off the annular shoulder 232 and will not be received by the detection element 236 for detection by the detection circuitry 222.
In such an embodiment, where the perturbing element 240 is configured to generate the reference signal, the presence of the reflected electrical signal will indicate that the perturbing element 240 and the detection element 236 are configured in the first state while the lack of a detected reference signal will indicate that the perturbing element 240 and the detection element 236 are configured in the second state.
As described above, in various embodiments, the time difference between the instances when the detection circuit 222 detects the reflected signal compared with the instances when the detection circuit fails to detect the reflected signal can be used to determine spin rate and/or the rotational orientation of the despun control portion 124 about the central axis 144.
Furthermore, there are various other methods for detection of body spin utilizing the detection element 236 and perturbing element 240 contemplated as within the scope of this disclosure. For example, in some embodiments, the body spin detection device 224 can be configured for impedance matching to determine the spin rate of the despun control portion 124. As such, in various embodiments the detection element 236 and perturbing element 240 can be configured for impedance matching of the detecting circuit 222 based on the rotational orientation of the detection element 236 and perturbing element 240. For example, in various embodiments the detecting circuit 222 can be configured to be impedance matched while the detection element 236 is not aligned with the perturbing element 240 but not be impedance matched when the detection element 236 and perturbing element 240 are aligned.
As described above, in various embodiments, the time difference between the instances when the detection circuit 222 impedance matched or not impedance matched can then be used to determine spin rate and/or the rotational orientation of the despun control portion 124 about the central axis 144.
In some embodiments, the detection element 236 can include one or more additional matching elements or waveguides in the annular shoulder 232 that may be placed with the detection element 236. In various embodiments, these additional waveguides can be electrically connected to the detection element 236 in series, in parallel, or both. In certain embodiments, these electrically connected matching elements are configured to combine and cancel the transmitted electrical signal from the detection element 236 such that little signal is reflected by the first face 228 of the despun control portion 124.
In these embodiments, the perturbing element 240 is configured as a waveguide similar to the detection element 236. As such, in various embodiments, when the perturbing element 240 and the detection element 236 are aligned, the transmitted electrical signal will couple to waveguide perturbing element 240. In various embodiments, in operation, the transmitted electrical signal will then travel down the length of the waveguide perturbing element 240 where the waveguide is terminated in an impedance or load. In various embodiments this load can be designed to reflect most of the signal which then travels back down the perturbing element 240 waveguide and reflects back to the detection element 236. In various embodiments, when received by the detection element 236 the reflected signal then is transmitted to the detection circuitry 222 where it can be measured.
Again, as described above, this reflected signal will be different from any signal at the detection circuitry 222 when the perturbing element 240 is not aligned with the detection element 236. This difference in signal characteristics (in amplitude, phase, etc.) will denote the time at which the perturbing element 240 is located adjacent to the detection element 236 and can be used to determine spin rate and/or the time at which the spinning portion is oriented in a particular manner.
In various embodiments the generated electrical signal has a wave frequency such that the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave is comparable to or smaller than the projectile diameter. For example, in certain embodiments the electrical signal is a microwave having a wavelength in the range 0.001 meters to 0.3 meters. However, in certain embodiments the electromagnetic wave could have a larger or smaller wavelength. For example, in certain embodiments the electrical signal could be a microwave having a wavelength in the range of 1 mm to 1 meter. In certain embodiments the wavelength of the electrical signal can be selected based on the type/size of projectile. For example, the wavelength could be larger for larger projectiles such as artillery shells, large caliber munitions, mortars, or other suitable projectiles.
Referring to
In one or more embodiments the despun control portion 124 includes a plurality of perturbing elements 204a, 204b, 204c, 204d. In certain embodiments perturbing elements 204a, 204b, 204c, 204d, are spaced circumferentially about the first face 228 for altering or otherwise changing characteristics of an electric signal transmitted by a detection element 236. As described above, in certain embodiments the characteristics (e.g. amplitude, phase, etc.) of the reflected electrical signal will differ based on whether the signal is reflected by the first face 228 or is reflected by one of the perturbing elements 204a, 204b, 204c, 204d.
For example, in various embodiments each of the perturbing elements 204a, 204b, 204c, 204d includes various features that modify or alter the characteristics of the reflected electric signal as compared to when the signal is reflected by the first face 228. Further, in certain embodiments each of the perturbing elements modify or alter characteristics of the reflected signal in a manner that is unique to each of the perturbing elements 204a, 204b, 204c, 204d. As such, in various embodiments, the reflected electrical signal can act as a reference signal for the detection circuitry 222 where the detection circuitry can measure the characteristics of the reflected signal to determine which of the perturbing elements 204a, 204b, 204c, 204d modified or altered the original signal.
As such, in various embodiments the detection circuit 222 can be configured to determine the specific rotational orientation of the despun control portion 124. For example, in certain embodiments, the detection circuitry can detect a unique reflected signal that indicates that a specific perturbing element 204a, 204b, 204c, 204d is aligned with the detection element 236.
Referring to
As such, and depicted in
In various embodiments the detection circuit 236 includes a microstrip transmission line 520 and a transition section 524. In various embodiments the transmission line 520 and transition section 524 are configured to be communicatively connected to the SIW 504 to serve as an input/output line for the detection element 236. For example, in various embodiments the microstrip transmission line 520 can be used to transmit/receive electromagnetic waves or electric signals for interfacing with detection circuitry 222 (
As described above, in various embodiments the SIW 504 of the detection element 236 is left open circuited at the end which faces the perturbing element 240 for transmission/leaking of an electrical signal or electromagnetic wave between the two elements 236, 240. For example, depicted in
In operation, in various embodiments, perturbing element 240 and detection element 236 function substantially similar as described above with reference to
Referring to
In one or more embodiments device 600 is configured as a reflectometer including a signal source 604 comprising a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) that, in operation, generates a sinewave or other electronic wave. In various embodiments the signal source is coupled with a waveguide 608, such as detection element 236 as described above, or other waveguide for transmitting the signal. In various embodiments, in operation, the transmitted signal 612 is transmitted to a rotating or spinning surface 616 that includes one or more perturbing elements, such as perturbing element 240, or other waveguides. In various embodiments, the surface 616 results in some portion of the transmitted signal 612 being reflected back to the waveguide 608 as a reflected signal 620 where it is sampled by a directional coupler 622 and transmitted towards detection circuitry 624. In certain embodiments, the reflected signal may be amplified by an amplifier 628.
In one or more embodiments the detection circuitry 622 is configured to convert the signal 620 into a low frequency voltage. In various embodiments, as a result of one or more perturbing elements in the surface 612, characteristics of the reflected signal will differ based on whether the originating signal was reflected by a perturbing element or not. As such, in various embodiments the voltage level converted by the detection circuitry 622 can be used to determine when the signal 612 was reflected by one or more perturbing elements in surface 616. As described above, in various embodiments the time between the voltage spikes can be used to determine the spin rate and/or the rotational orientation of the surface 616.
Referring to
In one or more embodiments, the guided projectile 800 may include executable instructions, such as program modules, stored in memory 808 (e.g. computer readable storage medium) for execution by the processor 804. Program modules may include routines, programs, objects, instructions, logic, data structures, and so on, that perform particular tasks according to one or more of the embodiments described herein.
In one or more embodiments, the guided projectile 800 includes the sensor array 816 for determining projectile velocity, projectile spin rate, and other data for determining an SG for the projectile 800. In various embodiments, guided projectile 800 includes the power supply 818 in the form of an alternator that is configured to generate power for the projectile 800. For example, in one or more embodiments, when fired, a flight control portion in the form of a despun control portion 124 is aerodynamically despun relative to the remainder of the projectile 800 causing relative rotation between elements of the alternator and thereby generating sufficient power for operation of the processor 804, memory 808, body spin detection device 810, transceiver 812, and sensor array 816. In certain embodiments, power supply 818 may additionally include a battery.
Referring to
In one or more embodiments the method 900 includes, at operation 904, transmitting, via the detection element, an electrical signal in an axial direction towards the perturbing element and the other of the first face and the opposing annular shoulder.
In one or more embodiments the method 900 includes, at operation 908, receiving, via the detection element, a first input signal. In various embodiments, and as described above, the first input signal is a reflected portion of the transmitted electrical signal reflected via the perturbing element.
In one or more embodiments the method 900 includes, at operation 912, determining a first set of signal characteristics for the first input signal. As described above, in various embodiments, as a result of one or more perturbing elements, characteristics of the reflected signal will differ based on whether the transmitted signal was reflected by a perturbing element or not. For instance, the voltage level converted by the detection circuitry will vary based on whether the transmitted signal was reflected by a perturbing element.
In one or more embodiments the method 900 includes, at operation 916, receiving, via the detection element, a second input signal, the second input signal being a reflected portion of the transmitted electrical signal reflected via the other of the first face and the opposing annular shoulder not including the perturbing element.
In one or more embodiments the method 900 includes, at operation 920, determining a second set of signal characteristics for the second input signal.
In one or more embodiments the method 900 includes, at operation 924, determining, a spin rate for at least one of the despun collar portion and the chassis by determining a time period between receiving the first input signal and the second input signal.
In various embodiments, operation 924 can additionally include determining that the first and second input signals are different. For instance, in such embodiments operation 924 can include comparing the first set of signal characteristics to the second set of signal characteristics to determine instances where the signal is altered by the perturbing element as compared to instances where the input signal is unaffected by the perturbing element. For instance, as described above, in certain embodiments the voltage level converted by the detection circuitry will vary based on whether the transmitted signal was reflected by a perturbing element or not. As such, in various embodiments the first and second input signals can be differentiated by comparing the voltage levels of each signal.
In one or more embodiments, the input signals can be used to determine when the signal was reflected by one or more perturbing elements in surface. As described above, in various embodiments the time between the voltage spikes can be used to determine the spin rate and/or the rotational orientation of the surface. For example, voltage levels corresponding to the first input signal will indicate that the detection element is rotationally aligned with the at least one perturbing element. Similarly, in various embodiments the time differential between voltage spikes can be used to determine the spin rate of the despun collar/chassis. In certain embodiments, the spin rate along with the first input signal can be used to determine the rotational position of the despun collar at any particular moment, by using the spin rate and time since the first input signal was received to determine the rotational orientation of the collar.
Referring to
In one or more embodiments the method 1000 includes, at operation 1004, transmitting an electrical signal from a perturbing element towards a detection element. As described above, while various embodiments herein describe that the detection element is configured to transmit the electrical signal, in some embodiments the perturbing element can be configured to generate a reference signal for detection by the detecting circuit. In such embodiments, the perturbing element is configured as a waveguide such that an electronic reference signal is transmitted outward of the perturbing element from the first face to the annular shoulder of the chassis.
As such, in various embodiments, if the perturbing element and detection element are rotationally aligned, configured in the first state, the detection element will receive the electrical signal directed from the perturbing element. However, if the perturbing element and the detection element are non-aligned, configured in the second state, the reference signal will instead reflect off the annular shoulder and will not be received by the detection element for detection by the detection circuitry.
In such embodiments, where the perturbing element is configured to generate the reference signal, the presence of the reflected electrical signal will indicate that the perturbing element and the detection element are configured in the first state while the lack of a detected reference signal will indicate that the perturbing element and the detection element are configured in the second state.
In one or more embodiments the method 1000 includes, at operation 1008, receiving a first input signal via the detection element and, at operation 1012, receiving a second input signal via the detection element. In one or more embodiments the method 1000 includes, at operation 1016, determining a spin rate for at least one of the despun collar portion and the chassis by determining a time period between receiving the first input signal and the second input signal.
As described above, in various embodiments, the time difference between the instances when the detection circuit detects the reflected signal compared with the instances when the detection circuit fails to detect the reflected signal can be used to determine spin rate and/or the rotational orientation of the despun control portion about the central axis.
One or more embodiments may be a computer program product. The computer program product may include a computer readable storage medium (or media) including computer readable program instructions for causing a processor control an in-flight spin rate of a spin-stabilized projectile, according to the various embodiments described herein.
The computer readable storage medium is a tangible non-transitory device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, or other suitable storage media.
A computer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.
Program instructions, as described herein, can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network. A network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device may receive computer readable program instructions from the network and forward the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.
Computer readable program instructions for carrying out one or more embodiments, as described herein, may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages.
The computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on a single computer, or partly on the single computer and partly on a remote computer. In some embodiments, the computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the remote computer. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the single computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or public network.
One or more embodiments are described herein with reference to a flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, systems, and computer program products for enhancing target intercept according to one or more of the embodiments described herein. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, may be implemented by computer readable program instructions.
These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the functions/acts specified in the flowcharts and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). In some embodiments, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved.
In addition to the above disclosure, the following U.S. Patent Applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes: Ser. Nos. 15/998,269; 15/290,755; 15/290,768; 15/290,844. Furthermore, the following U.S. Patents are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes: U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,111,080; 4,537,371; 4,373,688; 4,438,893; 4,512,537; 4,568,039; 5,425,514; 5,452,864; 5,788,178; 6,314,886; 6,422,507; 6,502,786; 6,629,669; 6,981,672; 7,412,930; 7,431,237; 7,781,709; 7,849,800; 8,258,999; 8,319,164; and 9,040,885 The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present disclosure have been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the described embodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to explain the principles of the embodiments, the practical application or technical improvement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodiments disclosed herein.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/580,156, filed Nov. 1, 2017, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2340781 | Wagner | Feb 1944 | A |
2513157 | Ferris et al. | Jun 1950 | A |
2687482 | Harmon et al. | Aug 1954 | A |
2996008 | Allen et al. | Aug 1961 | A |
3000307 | Trotter, Jr. | Sep 1961 | A |
3111080 | French et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
3111088 | Fisk | Nov 1963 | A |
3233950 | Baermann | Feb 1966 | A |
3598022 | Maier | Aug 1971 | A |
3614181 | Meeks | Oct 1971 | A |
3747529 | Plattner | Jul 1973 | A |
3913870 | Bolick | Oct 1975 | A |
3939773 | Jenkins et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3943520 | Apstein et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4044682 | Karayannis | Aug 1977 | A |
4088076 | Karayannis | May 1978 | A |
4176814 | Albrektsson et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4202515 | Maxwell, Jr. | May 1980 | A |
4207841 | Bloomer | Jun 1980 | A |
4267562 | Raimondi | May 1981 | A |
4347996 | Grosso | Sep 1982 | A |
4373688 | Topliffe | Feb 1983 | A |
4379598 | Goldowsky | Apr 1983 | A |
4431150 | Epperson, Jr. | Feb 1984 | A |
4438893 | Sands et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4512537 | Sebestyen et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4525514 | Yachigo et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4528911 | DePhillipo et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4537371 | Lawhorn et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4547837 | Bennett | Oct 1985 | A |
4565340 | Bains | Jan 1986 | A |
4568039 | Smith et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4638321 | Drogin | Jan 1987 | A |
4664339 | Crossfield | May 1987 | A |
4667899 | Wedertz | May 1987 | A |
4815682 | Feldmann | Mar 1989 | A |
4860969 | Muller et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4898342 | Kranz et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4899956 | King et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4934273 | Endriz | Jun 1990 | A |
4964593 | Kranz | Oct 1990 | A |
5043615 | Oshima | Aug 1991 | A |
5101728 | Frink | Apr 1992 | A |
5125344 | Kline et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5126610 | Fremerey | Jun 1992 | A |
5139216 | Larkin | Aug 1992 | A |
5163637 | Hansen | Nov 1992 | A |
5259567 | Jano et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271328 | Boulais et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5321329 | Hovorka | Jun 1994 | A |
5327140 | Buckreub | Jul 1994 | A |
5381445 | Hershey et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5425514 | Grosso | Jun 1995 | A |
5452864 | Alford et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5489909 | Dittmann et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495221 | Post | Feb 1996 | A |
5506459 | Ritts | Apr 1996 | A |
5529262 | Horwath | Jun 1996 | A |
5619083 | Dunfield | Apr 1997 | A |
5661555 | Romer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669581 | Ringer | Sep 1997 | A |
5696347 | Sebeny, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5725179 | Gilman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734389 | Bruce et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5747907 | Miller | May 1998 | A |
5775636 | Vig et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5780766 | Schröppel | Jul 1998 | A |
5788178 | Barrett, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5894181 | Imlach | Apr 1999 | A |
5917442 | Manoogian | Jun 1999 | A |
5932836 | White | Aug 1999 | A |
5971875 | Hill | Oct 1999 | A |
5982319 | Borden et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986373 | Stucker | Nov 1999 | A |
6020854 | Jagnow et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6052647 | Parkinson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6126109 | Barson | Oct 2000 | A |
6135387 | Seidel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6163021 | Mickelson | Dec 2000 | A |
6186443 | Shaffer | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204801 | Sharka et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208936 | Minor et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6227820 | Jurvik | May 2001 | B1 |
6234082 | Cros et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6314886 | Kuhnle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345785 | Harkins et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352218 | Holmqvist et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6389974 | Foster | May 2002 | B1 |
6390642 | Simonton | May 2002 | B1 |
6398155 | Hepner et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422507 | Lipeles | Jul 2002 | B1 |
D461159 | Miralles et al. | Aug 2002 | S |
6493651 | Harkins et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6502786 | Rupert | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6580392 | Yu | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6588700 | Moore et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6595041 | Hansen | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6629669 | Jensen | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6653972 | Krikorian et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6666402 | Rupert et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6693592 | Dowdle et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6727843 | Hansen | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6796525 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6806605 | Gabrys | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6834591 | Rawcliffe et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6842674 | Solomon | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6869044 | Geswender | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882314 | Zimmerman et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889934 | Thomas et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6923404 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6970128 | Dwelly et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6981672 | Clancy et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7015855 | Medl et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020501 | Elliott et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7098841 | Hager et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7174835 | Knapp | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7226016 | Johnsson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7267298 | Leininger | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7305467 | Kaiser et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7338009 | Bobinchak et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7341221 | Wilson | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7354017 | Morris et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7412930 | Smith et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7422175 | Bobinchak et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7431237 | Mock et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7475846 | Schroeder | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7500636 | Bredy | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7548202 | Jennings | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7566027 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7584922 | Bär et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7626544 | Smith et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7631833 | Ghaleb et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7675012 | Bobinchak et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7681504 | Machina et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7701380 | Altes | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7781709 | Jones et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7791007 | Harnoy | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7834301 | Clingman | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849797 | Geswender et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7849800 | Hinsdale et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7900619 | Palmer et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7947936 | Bobinchak et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7963442 | Jenkins et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7989742 | Bredy | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7999212 | Thiesen et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8063347 | Urbano et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8064737 | Herrick | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8076623 | Dryer | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8113118 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8125198 | Steinbrecher | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8183746 | Rastegar | May 2012 | B2 |
8229163 | Coleman et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8258999 | Rastegar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8288698 | Seidensticker | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8288699 | Romero et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8319162 | Mccool | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8319163 | Flood et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8319164 | Martinez | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8324542 | Frey, Jr. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8344303 | Elgersma et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8410412 | Geswender et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8426788 | Geswender | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8471186 | Wallis | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8471758 | Samuel et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8487226 | Biswell | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8508404 | Wilmhoff | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8519313 | Geswender et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8552349 | Alexander | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8552351 | Geswender et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8558151 | Seidensticker | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8669505 | Guibout et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8674277 | Axford et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8698059 | Nikkel et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8701558 | Rastegar | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8716639 | Mallon | May 2014 | B2 |
8748787 | Weiss et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757064 | Jennings et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8812654 | Gelvin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8816260 | Hindman et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8832244 | Gelvin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8836503 | Gelvin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8916810 | Geswender et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8950335 | Strömberg et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8993948 | Geswender et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
D729896 | Martinez | May 2015 | S |
9031725 | DiEsposti | May 2015 | B1 |
9040885 | Morris et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9048701 | Lang | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9052202 | Riley | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9070236 | DiEsposti | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9071171 | Rastegar | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9086258 | Vasudevan et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9108713 | Tao et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9187184 | Miralles et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9194675 | Manole et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9211947 | Miralles | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9303964 | Wurzel et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9347753 | Horch et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9360286 | Pettersson et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9371856 | Kundel | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9557405 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9587923 | Wurzel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9644929 | Bradbury et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9683814 | Dryer | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9709372 | Edwards | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9739878 | Gudim et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9939238 | Sowle et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10054404 | Balk et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10203188 | Sowle et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10288397 | Rastegar et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
11056962 | Kao | Jul 2021 | B2 |
20010030260 | Niemeyer et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20030076260 | Ryken et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040046467 | Huang et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068415 | Solomon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099173 | Rector et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040134337 | Solomon | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060061949 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080012751 | Owens et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080061188 | Morris et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080093498 | Leal et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080223977 | Dryer | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237391 | Mock et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100199873 | Rastegar | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100213307 | Hinsdale et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100237185 | Dryer | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110032361 | Tamir et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110094372 | Carlson | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120068000 | Goldner et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120211593 | Morris et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130126612 | Durkee | May 2013 | A1 |
20130126667 | Weiss et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130126668 | Chessel et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20150203201 | Tao et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150330755 | Citro et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160185445 | Miralles et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160347476 | Xiao | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160252333 | Carlqvist et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170021945 | Fisher et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170023057 | Guokun et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170191809 | Harris et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170299355 | Trouillot et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180245895 | Malul et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190041175 | Fellows et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190041527 | Gutafson | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190302276 | Sandford et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200064112 | Rami | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200292287 | Thoren et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2441277 | Oct 2002 | CA |
0093603 | Nov 1983 | EP |
0675335 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0988501 | Feb 2003 | EP |
2165152 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2547425 | Aug 2017 | GB |
WO2007058573 | May 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Baig et al., “Architecture for Range, Doppler and Direction Finding Radar”, J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci., vol. 4, No. 7S, 2014, pp. 193-198. |
Costanzo et al., “High Resolution Software Defined Radar System for Target Detection”, Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 573217, 2013, 7 pages. |
Kwag et al., “Modern Software Defined Radar (SDR) Technology and Its Trends”, Journal of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science, vol. 14, No. 4, Dec. 2014, pp. 321-328. |
Deng, Zilong et al., “Roll Angle Measurement for a Spinning Vehicle Based on GPS Signals Received by a Single-Patch Antenna”, Sensors, 18 (10), 3479, Oct. 16, 2018, pp. 1-22. |
Bekmezci et al., “Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs); A Survey”, posted on the Internet at elsevier.com/locate.adhoc; Jan. 8, 2013, published by Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 17 pages. |
Zhang, B. et al. Mechanical Construction and Analysis of an Axial Flux Segmented Armature Torus Machine, International Conference on Electrical Machines, 2-5, Sep. 2014, pp. 1293-1299. |
Zou, T. et al., “Analysis of a Dual-Rotor, Toroidal-Winding, Axial-Flux Vernier Permanent Magnet Machine”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, May/Jun. 2017, vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 1920-1930. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62580156 | Nov 2017 | US |