The invention relates to fiber optic devices and in particular to a fiber optical Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) assembly that is adapted to sense the magnitude and direction of acoustic signals, and particularly those signals that are travelling at an angle or substantially perpendicular to the device.
Various attempts have been made to provide sensing capabilities in the context of petroleum exploration, production, and monitoring, with varying degrees of success. Recently, these attempts have included the use of fiber optic cables to detect acoustic energy. Because the cables typically comprise optically conducting fiber containing a plurality of backscattering inhomogeneities along the length of the fiber, such systems allow the distributed measurement of optical path length changes along an optical fiber by measuring backscattered light from a laser pulse input into the fiber. Because they allow distributed sensing, such systems may be referred to as “distributed acoustic sensing” or “DAS” systems. One use of DAS systems is in seismic applications, in which seismic sources at known locations transmit acoustic signals into the formation, and/or passive seismic sources emit acoustic energy. The signals are received at seismic sensors after passing through and/or reflecting through the formation. The received signals can be processed to give information about the formation through which they passed. This technology can be used to record a variety of seismic information. Another application is in the field of in-well applications and acoustic fluid monitoring.
DAS systems typically detect backscattering of short (1-10 meter) laser pulses from impurities or inhomogeneities in the optical fiber. If fiber is deformed by an incident seismic wave then 1) the distance between impurities changes and 2) the speed of the laser pulses changes. Both of these effects influence the backscattering process. By observing changes in the backscattered signal it is possible to reconstruct the seismic wave amplitude. The first of the above effects appears only if the fiber is stretched or compressed axially. The second effect is present in case of axial as well as radial fiber deformations. The second effect is, however, several times weaker than the first. Moreover, radial deformations of the fiber are significantly damped by materials surrounding the fiber. As a result, a conventional DAS system with a straight fiber is mainly sensitive to seismic waves polarized along the cable axis, such as compression (P) waves propagating along the cable or shear (S) waves propagating perpendicular to the cable. The strength of the signal varies approximately as cos2 θ, where θ is the angle between the fiber axis and the direction of wave propagation (for P waves). Thus, while there exists a variety of commercially available DAS systems that have varying sensitivity, dynamic range, spatial resolution, linearity, etc., all of these systems are primarily sensitive to axial strain. Acoustic signals travelling normal to the fiber axis may sometimes be referred to as “broadside” signals and, for P waves, result in radial strain on the fiber. Thus, as the angle between direction of travel of the acoustic signal and the fiber axis approaches 90°, DAS cables become much less sensitive to the signal and may even fail to detect it.
Hence, it is desirable to provide an improved cable that is more sensitive to signals travelling normal to its axis and enables distinguishing radial strain from the axial strain. Sensitivity to broadside waves is particularly important for seismic or microseismic applications, with cables on the surface or downhole. In addition to broadside sensitivity, it is also desirable to provide three-component (3C) sensing, from which the direction of travel of the sensed signal can be determined.
The present invention provides an improved fiber optic cable system for distributed acoustic sensing that is more sensitive to signals travelling normal to its axis and is thus better able to distinguish radial strain from axial strain on the system. Acoustic signals travelling normal to the cable axis may sometimes be referred to as “broadside” signals and result in radial strain on the fiber. The present invention also provides three-component (3C) sensing, from which the direction of travel of the sensed signal can be determined.
According to some embodiments, a distributed fiber optic acoustic sensing system comprises an elongated body having an outer surface, an optical fiber disposed on the outer surface at a first predetermined wrap angle, and light transmitting and receiving means optically connected to the fiber for, respectively, transmitting an optical signal into the fiber and receiving a backscattered component of the signal out of the fiber. The system may further include a second optical fiber disposed on the outer surface at a second predetermined wrap angle. The wrap angles may be measured with respect to a plane normal to the axis of the body and the first wrap angle may be 90° and the second wrap angle may be less than 45°.
The system may further include a third fiber disposed on the outer surface at a wrap angle between 90° and 45°. At least one of the fibers may include Bragg gratings.
The body may have a circular cross-section or an elliptical cross-section and may include a layer of swellable elastomer surrounding the body.
A sensing rod may be disposed in the elongated body and may contain at least one additional fiber. The additional fiber(s) may be substantially straight, helical, or sinusoidal.
The system may further include layer of swellable elastomer between the sensing rod and the elongate body. Additionally or alternatively, the system may include a first sheath layer on the outside of the body and covering the fiber. The first sheath layer may have an oval external cross-section. The elongate body may have a non-circular cross-section having a larger semi-axis and the first sheath layer may be configured so that its larger semi-axis is perpendicular to the larger semi-axis of the elongate body.
The system may include a second optical fiber wrapped around the outside of the first sheath layer. The first fiber and the second fiber may define different wrap angles. The system may include a second sheath layer on the outside of the first sheath layer and covering the second fiber. At least one of the sheath layers preferably comprises a polyamide or material having a similar elastic impedance.
Other embodiments of a distributed fiber optic acoustic sensing system comprise an elongate body having an outer surface that includes at least one substantially flat face, a first optical fiber housed in the body, and light transmitting and receiving means optically connected to the fiber for transmitting an optical signal into the fiber and receiving a backscattered component of the signal out of the fiber. The body may have a polygonal or triangular cross-section. The first fiber may be sinusoidal and the system may include a second sinusoidal fiber defining a plane perpendicular to the plane of the first fiber. The system may include a third fiber, which may be substantially straight or helical, and may define a wrap angle with respect to a plane normal to the axis of the body. The wrap angle may be less than 45° or less than 30°.
In preferred embodiments, the substantially flat face may have a visual appearance that is different from the appearance of the rest of the outer surface.
Still other embodiments of the invention include a distributed fiber optic acoustic sensing system comprising an inner tube, a layer of swellable elastomer surrounding the tube, a tube of swellable elastomer surrounding the elastomer layer and defining an annulus therewith, and at least one sensor pad or strip disposed in the elastomer tube, each sensor pad comprising a stiffener and at least one longitudinal fiber affixed thereto or embedded therein. The system may include at least four sensor pads are disposed in the elastomer tube. At least one optical fiber may be housed in the inner tube.
The inner tube may comprise a steel tube and the elastomer layer and the elastomer tube may be configured such that when they swell the annulus disappears. The elastomer layer is further configured such that when it swells without being constrained, its diameter exceeds a predetermined value that is selected to correspond to the inner diameter of a hole in the earth. The elastomer tube may be further configured such that when it swells in a borehole, the sensor pad(s) is/are disposed at the outer surface of the elastomer tube. The longitudinal fiber in each sensor pad may be sinusoidal, and/or each sensor pad may include one sinusoidal longitudinal fiber and one straight longitudinal fiber. At least one of the optical fibers may contain Bragg gratings.
Still other embodiments of a distributed fiber optic acoustic sensing system for use on a surface comprise an inner tube housing at least one optical fiber, a body of protective material surrounding the tube, the body having an outer surface that includes at least one substantially flat face, and at least one sensor pad or strip disposed in the body, the sensor pad comprising a stiffener and at least one longitudinal fiber affixed thereto or embedded therein. The at least one sensor pad may also include at least one sinusoidal fiber affixed thereto or embedded therein. The system may include at least two sensor pads that each include at least one sinusoidal fiber affixed thereto or embedded therein, and the two sensor pads may be mutually perpendicular. At least one sensor pad may be adjacent to the flat face.
The inner tube may also houses at least one electrical transmission line. The system may further including an anchor that is configured to overlie the body and includes at least one arm for anchoring the anchor and body to the surface. The arm may be straight or curved.
As used herein the phrases “propagating along the fiber” and “propagating perpendicular to the fiber,” when used in reference to an acoustic signal, will be understood to refer to P waves that are polarized along their direction of propagation.
For a more detailed understanding of the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings wherein:
DAS Cable with Helically Wrapped Fibers for Improved Broadside Sensitivity
One aspect of the present invention comprises a DAS fiber helically wrapped around a cable or mandrel for the purpose of providing improved broadside sensitivity. A helically wound fiber will always include portions of the fiber that form relatively small angles with the incident wave, independently of the angle of incidence. Assuming that the cable and fiber are perfectly coupled to the formation, one can determine the fiber angular sensitivity S by projecting the wave strain along the fiber axis. This gives:
where α is the wrapping angle, i.e. the angle between the fiber and a plane perpendicular to the cable or mandrel axis, and θ is the angle of incidence with respect to the cable of mandrel axis.
The case of a straight fiber corresponds to the wrapping angle α=90°. If the wrapping angle is about α=35°, then the fiber sensitivity will not depend on the angle θ and will be equal to S=⅓. As can be seen, a helically wrapped fiber does not change the overall sensitivity of the system, but redistributes it in three spatial directions.
The above sensitivity S refers to unit fiber length. The length of the fiber Lf is equal to Lf=Lc/sin α, where Lc is the length of the cable along which the fiber is wrapped. The sensitivity of a helically wrapped fiber per unit cable length is thus (1/sin α) times higher than the above value of S. Hence, by using a helically wrapped fiber, it is possible to not only increase the broadside sensitivity of the system, but also its overall sensitivity by packing more fiber length in the same cable length compared with a straight fiber. Alternatively, by using a wrapped fiber and decreasing the cable-length of the sensing channels, the spatial resolution can be increased while retaining the same sensitivity as with a straight fiber.
The concepts described herein can be implemented using one, two, or three fibers with different wrapping angles. Preferred embodiments of the sensing system include at least one fiber with a wrap angle of 90°, i.e. parallel to the cable axis, and one fiber with a wrap angle less than 45°. Still more preferred embodiments include a third fiber with a wrap angle between 45° and 90°. Fibers with different wrapping angles have different directional sensitivity, and by comparing their responses one can determine the direction of wave propagation with respect to the fiber axis.
In addition, multiple fibers can be wrapped inside a single cable at different radii. Alternatively, multiple cables each having a single helically wrapped fiber can be used. Still further, while certain embodiments are disclosed in terms of a fiber that is wrapped around a cylindrical body, it will be understood that the fiber need not actually encircle the body but may instead change or reverse direction so as to define fiber segments having a predetermined wrap angle alternating with bends or reversing segments.
Thus, as shown in
By way of example only an optical sensing system may include a first, straight fiber, a second fiber with a wrap angle of 30° with respect to the plane normal to the cable axis, and a third fiber with a wrap angle of between 30° and 90°. The fiber wrapped at 30° gives exactly 2 m of fiber per 1 m of axial length and the third fiber allows for verification of data from other two fibers.
In embodiments such as that of
In case of a non-perfect coupling between the cable and formation, the fiber sensitivity has the form
S=cos2 θ sin2 α+(A+B sin2 θ)cos2 α
where A and B are constants whose values depend on the material properties of the cable and formation.
The choice of the cable material depends on the concrete purpose of the DAS system. For example, a relatively stiff cable with a Young's modulus of several GPa provides a low material contrast with the formation, which corresponds to A=0 and B=0.5 in the above equation. Such a cable has better directional sensitivity than a more flexible cable. Using such cables may be preferable in a borehole environment or if the cable is buried deep in the subsurface. In case of soft cables, the value of A can be much larger than 1 The signal from such cables will have weak dependence on the wave propagation angle, but such cables will have a higher overall sensitivity. This is important for trenched cables that lie close to the surface, where the pressure of the incident wave is very low.
The quantities A and B depend on the cable construction and the acoustic properties of the surrounding medium (Vp, Vs, density). In the near-surface, these medium properties vary over time due to seasonable changes, rain, etc. These variations produce misleading time-lapse effects that tend to mask true time-lapse signals from reservoir processes. One way to overcome this problem is to measure the seismic signals along the cable as a function of incidence angle and determine the quantities A and B ab initio. Such an approach may not be practical in general, but may be feasible in time-lapse applications, i.e, only determining the changes in A and B, information which would be useful to increase the fidelity of time-lapse processing.
A fiber wrapped around a circular cylinder, however, does not discriminate between waves propagating normally to the cable axis from different azimuthal directions Azimuthal sensitivity can be added by using helixes of noncircular, e.g. elliptical, wrapping shapes, which allow detection of all three components of the incident waves.
DAS Cable with Built-in Cable Trajectory Visualization (RTCM) Capability
In some embodiments, the cable could include a distributed strain sensing (DSS) fiber similar to the one used in real-time compaction monitoring (RTCM) systems. In RTCM systems, an optical fiber is used that contains thousands of fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) wrapped around a tubular. Because the fiber is helically wrapped, the strain response can be decomposed into different deformation modes (bending, ovalization, axial strain) and the outputs of the decomposition can be used to produce a three-dimensional image of the tubular shape.
The same principle can be applied to the cable disclosed in this present invention so as to measure the hole trajectory from the strain on the cable, which is important to know in some seismic applications. In this embodiment, an additional fiber containing FBGs can be embedded into the cable or one of the fibers used for DAS can contain FBGs with grating wavelengths that are sufficiently different from the interrogation wavelength of the DAS system. The RTCM interrogation unit would record the strain on the cable after/during installation to measure the shape of the cable and infer the trajectory (azimuth, depth, etc.) of the hole. From the trajectory of the hole, the location of the DAS channels can be derived in space relative to the seismic source(s) at the surface and to the formation.
In addition, this cable can be used as a permanent monitor of the geomechanics of the field. By monitoring the change in cable shape over time, it is possible to measure the amount of surface subsidence caused by oil and gas production. This information, when combined with the seismic data from DAS can improve the understanding of the reservoir dynamics and the geomechanics of a producing field.
Deployment Methodology to Allow Low-Noise Recording and Virtual Source Seismic
For surface seismic applications, the optical sensing cable incorporating the present concepts can be deployed in one or more trenches on the earth's surface or the seabed, or inside a small-diameter hole, or “data-hole,” in consolidated formations in the subsurface or subsea. The latter deployment mode tends to provide higher-quality data with higher-frequency content and allows virtual source seismic monitoring. It also reduces the environmental footprint of the sensing system.
Suitable small-diameter holes can be drilled using low-cost drilling techniques, such as horizontal directional drilling (HDD) or water-jetting. HDD and water-jet drilling ore often used for installing infrastructure such as telecommunications, power cables, gas mains etc. The horizontal or deviated hole may run several tens or hundreds of meters below the surface and may be hundreds or even thousands of meters long.
Once a data-hole has been drilled, there are various ways to install the optical sensing system. One way is to push a tube containing the optical sensing system into the hole, thereby using the drilling hose or tube, if it is still in the hole, as a guide to position the sensing tube inside the hole. After the sensing tube is in place, the drilling hose or tube may be removed from the hole.
In still other embodiments (not shown), the optical fiber(s) are integrated in the wall of the high pressure-hose or tubes used by the drilling system. In these embodiments, once the data-hole has been drilled, the pressure-hose/tubes incorporating the sensing system are left behind in the hole.
In other embodiments, the data-hole may include a surface exit. In this case, the sensing system can be pulled into the hole via the surface exit when the drill-string is being retrieved from the hole.
In some embodiments, the tubular containing the optical sensing system 10 may have an outer coating comprising a swellable elastomer 20, as shown in
Referring now to
Since a straight cable is sensitive only to one direction (along the cable), it allows a simple partitioning of the signal recorded on a wrapped fiber into along-the-cable and across-the-cable components, assuming that both fibers (wrapped and straight) are made of the same material and embedded in the same medium. If they are of different materials or in different parts of the cable (center vs. periphery), their overall sensitivities to external formation strain may be different—i.e., they may have different A and B coefficients in the equation above. In that case, a straight cable may still help calibrate or constrain the partitioning of the wrapped fiber signal but the calibration would not be through direct subtraction of the along-the-cable component.
Cable Configuration
In order to enable a decomposition of a signal into three orthogonal components, it is necessary to use at least three fibers that in combination provide sensitivity in all three directions. Referring now to
An advantage of the triangular cross-section is that the cable has a flat bottom surface 43, which can be fixedly oriented with respect to, e.g., the inner or outer wall of a tubular, which in turn facilitates azimuthal sensing. It will be understood that while cable 40 is shown with a triangular cross-section, any polygon would be suitable. Further, if a flat bottom surface is not desired, the cable cross-section may be round, elliptical, oval, or any other shape. In order to facilitate installation of the cable with a known orientation, bottom surface 43, or all or a portion of one of the other surfaces may be color-coded or otherwise visually marked. In the absence of such external indicator, the determination of the azimuthal orientation of the cable must be made through first-arrival analysis.
Still referring to
In another variation, the embodiment shown in
In either case, additional straight fibers 41 (shown in phantom in
Deployment of a Multi-Component Cable
Referring now to
Elongate sensor pads or strips 62 preferably extend the entire length of the cable. The material of which tube 60 is made is preferable flexible and elastomeric so as to enable it to respond to the expansion of the underlying swellable layer 52. In preferred embodiments, the pads are made of Nylon 11, which is preferably also used for encapsulating the fiber optic and hydraulic control lines. Nylon 11 has a crush resistance in excess of 100 tons per square inch and excellent abrasion resistance. In some embodiments, sensor pads 62 define all or the majority of the outer surface of multi-component cable 50, so that tube 60 is not or not substantially exposed to the borehole wall. In these embodiments, multi-component cable 50 may have a more or less square cross-section. It will be understood that there are a variety of configurations in which sensor pads and/or additional protective layers might be applied to or near the outer surface of tube 60.
The purpose of tube 60 is to protect and hold the desired sensing fibers (described below) in position while running in-hole. The material preferably provides mechanical support but is flexible enough to be pushed like a balloon against the wall of the hole during installation (described below).
During installation of the cable, the annulus between 52 and 60 is preferable empty and sealed, or filled with a fluid that will not activate the expandable components.
One or more straight or substantially straight optical fibers 54 are housed in tube 51 and one or more sinusoidal fibers 64 are provided within expandable tube 60. In preferred embodiments, each sinusoidal fiber 64 is embedded in or mounted on an elongated sensor pad or strip 62 having a relative high Young's modulus, e.g. 500 to 5000 MPa. In some embodiments, an optional straight fiber 57 (shown in
In some preferred embodiments, as illustrated, there are four sensor pads 62 evenly azimuthally spaced around tube 60. This embodiment provides two sets of fibers that are sensitive in two perpendicular plains. Having two sets of fibers for each orientation provides a useful redundancy in case, for example, sensor pads 62 twist when pressed against the uneven wall of an imperfectly shaped borehole. Optionally, the sinusoidal fiber 64 in one pad may have a different period, similar to a different “wrap angle,” than that on the opposite pad. Thus, the multi-wrap-angle concepts discussed above could be used in conjunction with this cable design.
Sinusoidal fibers 64 and optional straight fibers 57 may be embedded in sensor pads 62 in an extrusion process. Sensor pads 62 may comprise any suitable extrusion materials such as are known in the art, including polyamide polymers, metal, or ceramic.
Turning now to
Once the multi-component cable 50 is in place, swellable material(s) of layer 52 can be caused to swell by pumping an appropriate fluid (e.g. water) through the annulus between layer 52 and tube 60. As shown in
Multi-component cable 50 provides 3C operability with good acoustic coupling to the formation. Further, since it can be used in a small-diameter data-hole, multi-component cable 50 allows for relatively low-cost deployment and greatly reduced HSE footprint.
While
Body 82 is preferably constructed from a material having a Young's modulus, similar to or higher than the Young's Modulus of the sensor pad 62 or materials similar to the encapsulation materials used for fiber optic and hydraulic downhole control lines, as are known in the art, so as to provide crush- and abrasion-resistance.
In preferred embodiments, system 80 is used on the earth's surface for monitoring seismic signals travelling through the subsurface. Thus, it may be used in conjunction with a ground anchor 90 such as is shown in
In addition to the various applications mentioned above, the optical sensing systems described herein can be used as towed streamer cables or deployed on the seabed (OBC). It is expected that DAS systems in underwater applications would work better than in trenched cables on land because of the absence of surface waves subsea and because the subsea acoustic media are stable over time and are not affected by seasonal changes.
The embodiments described herein can be used advantageously alone or in combination with each other and/or with other fiber optic concepts. The methods and apparatus described herein can be used to measure arrival times and waveforms of acoustic signals and in particular broadside acoustic waves. Arrival times and waveforms give information about the formation and can be used in various seismic techniques.
In still other applications, the methods and apparatus described herein can be used to detect microseisms and the data collected using the present invention, including broadside wave signals, can be used in microseismic localization. In these embodiments, the data are used to generate coordinates of a microseism. In still other applications, ability of the present systems to detect broadside waves and axial waves distinguishably can be used in various DAS applications, including but not limited to intruder detection, monitoring of traffic, pipelines, or other environments, and monitoring of various conditions in a borehole, including fluid inflow.
While preferred embodiments have been disclosed and described, it will be understood that various modifications can be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention as set out in the claims that follow.
This application is a divisional application claiming benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/365,231, filed on 13 Jun. 2014, which is a U.S. national stage application of International application No. PCT/US2012/069464, filed on 13 Dec. 2012, which claims priority from U.S. application Ser. No. 61/576,192, filed on 15 Dec. 2011, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4141623 | Dobost et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4524436 | Hall et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4568408 | Schmadel et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4634852 | Shaw | Jan 1987 | A |
5504720 | Meyer et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
6211964 | Luscombe et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6268911 | Tubel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269198 | Hodgson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281489 | Tubel et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6510103 | Knudsen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6588266 | Tubel et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601671 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6787758 | Tubel et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6840114 | Niezgorski | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853780 | Brandi et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6874361 | Meltz et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7040390 | Tubel et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7201221 | Tubel et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7224872 | Goldner et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7245791 | Rambow | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7284903 | Hartog | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7315666 | Van Der Spek | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7369716 | Berg et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7668411 | Davies et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7740064 | McCoy et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7946341 | Hartog et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7954560 | Mathiszik et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8380021 | Rambow | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8505625 | Ravi | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520195 | Ramos et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8848485 | Bostick, III | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9080949 | Mestayer | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9250120 | Smith et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20040043501 | Means et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050115741 | Terry et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060233482 | Rambow | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20090132183 | Hartog et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090188665 | Tubel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090219171 | Vigneaux | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100107754 | Hartog et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100207019 | Hartog et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100254650 | Rambow | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100315630 | Ramos et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110044574 | Strong | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069302 | Hill et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110088462 | Samson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110088910 | McCann et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110149688 | Hill et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110185815 | McCann | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110216996 | Rogers | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110280103 | Bostick | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110292763 | Coates et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320147 | Brady et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017687 | Davis et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120018149 | Fidan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120020184 | Wilson | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120057432 | Hill et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120111104 | Taverner et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120287749 | Kutlik et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130242698 | McEwen-King | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1299698 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2364380 | Jan 2002 | GB |
2009158630 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010010318 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010034986 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010136764 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2010136810 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011010110 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011039501 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011058312 | May 2011 | WO |
2011058313 | May 2011 | WO |
2011058314 | May 2011 | WO |
2011058322 | May 2011 | WO |
2011067554 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011076850 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011079107 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011141537 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011148128 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US2012/069464 dated Mar. 28, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160377476 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61576192 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14365231 | US | |
Child | 15259348 | US |