Detecting malicious network content using virtual environment components

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8793787
  • Patent Number
    8,793,787
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 23, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 29, 2014
    9 years ago
Abstract
Malicious network content is identified based on the behavior of one or more virtual environment components which process network content in a virtual environment. Network content can be monitored and analyzed using a set of heuristics. The heuristics identify suspicious network content communicated over a network. The suspicious network content can further be analyzed in a virtual environment that includes one or more virtual environment components. Each virtual environment component is configured to mimic live environment components, for example a browser application component or an operating system component. The suspicious network content is replayed in the virtual environment using one or more of the virtual environment components. The virtual environment component behavior is analyzed in view of an expected behavior to identify malicious network content. The malicious network content is then identified and processed.
Description
BACKGROUND

Presently, malicious network content (e.g., malicious software or malware) can attack various devices via a communication network. For example, malware may include any program or file that is harmful to a computer user, such as bots, computer viruses, worms, Trojan horses, adware, spyware, or any programming that gathers information about a computer user or otherwise operates without permission.


Adware is a program configured to direct advertisements to a computer or a particular user. In one example, adware identifies the computer and/or the user to various websites visited by a browser on the computer. The website may then use the adware to either generate pop-up advertisements or otherwise direct specific advertisements to the user's browser. Spyware is a program configured to collect information regarding the user, the computer, and/or a user's network habits. In an example, spyware may collect information regarding the names and types of websites that the user browses and then transmit the information to another computer. Adware and spyware are often added to the user's computer after the user browses to a website that hosts the adware and/or spyware. The user is often unaware that these programs have been added and are similarly unaware of the adware and/or spyware's function.


Various processes and devices have been employed to prevent the problems that malicious network content can cause. For example, computers often include antivirus scanning software that scans a particular client device for viruses. Computers may also include spyware and/or adware scanning software. The scanning may be performed manually or based on a schedule specified by a user associated with the particular computer, a system administrator, and so forth. Unfortunately, by the time a virus or spyware is detected by the scanning software, some damage on the particular computer or loss of privacy may have already occurred. Additionally, it can take weeks or months for new Anti-Virus signatures to be manually created and for an anti-virus application to be updated. Moreover, polymorphic exploits are also an issue that limits the effectiveness of some anti-virus applications.


In some instances, malicious network content comprises a bot. A bot is a software robot configured to remotely control all or a portion of a digital device (e.g., a computer) without authorization by the digital device's legitimate owner. Bot related activities include bot propagation and attacking other computers on a network. Bots commonly propagate by scanning nodes (e.g., computers or other digital devices) available on a network to search for a vulnerable target. When a vulnerable computer is scanned, the bot may install a copy of itself. Once installed, the new bot may continue to seek other computers on a network to infect. A bot may also be propagated by a malicious web site configured to exploit vulnerable computers that visit its web pages.


A bot may also, without the authority of the infected computer user, establish a command and control communication channel to receive instructions. Bots may receive command and control communication from a centralized bot server or another infected computer (e.g., via a peer-to-peer (P2P) network established by a bot on the infected computer). When a plurality of bots (i.e., a bot net) act together, the infected computers (i.e., zombies) can perform organized attacks against one or more computers on a network, or engage in criminal enterprises. In one example, bot infected computers may be directed to flood another computer on a network with excessive traffic in a denial-of-service attack. In another example, upon receiving instructions, one or more bots may direct the infected computer to transmit spam across a network. In a third example, bots may host illegal businesses such as pharmaceutical websites that sell pharmaceuticals without a prescription.


Malicious network content may be distributed over a network via web sites, e.g., servers operating on a network according to an HTTP standard. Malicious network content distributed in this manner may be actively downloaded and installed on a user's computer, without the approval or knowledge of the user, simply by accessing the web site hosting the malicious network content. The web site hosting the malicious network content may be referred to as a malicious web site. The malicious network content may be embedded within data associated with web pages hosted by the malicious web site. For example, a web page may include JavaScript code, and malicious network content may be embedded within the JavaScript code. In this example, the malicious network content embedded within the JavaScript code may be obfuscated such that it is not apparent until the JavaScript code is executed that the JavaScript code contains malicious network content. Therefore, the malicious network content may attack or infect a user's computer before detection by antivirus software, firewalls, intrusion detection systems, or the like.


SUMMARY

The behavior of one or more virtual environment components which process network content in a virtual environment is used to identify malicious network content. Network content can be monitored and analyzed using a set of heuristics. The heuristics identify suspicious network content communicated over a network. The suspicious network content can further be analyzed in a virtual environment that includes one or more virtual environment components. Each virtual environment component is configured to mimic live environment components, for example a browser application component or an operating system component. The suspicious network content is replayed in the virtual environment using one or more of the virtual environment components. The virtual environment component behavior is analyzed in view of an expected behavior. Malicious network content is detected based on observed component behavior that deviates from an expected behavior. The malicious network content is then identified and processed.


An embodiment detects malicious network content by receiving network content detected to be suspicious. A virtual environment component within a virtual environment is then configured to mimic a real application. The real application is configured to process the suspicious network content. The suspicious network content is then processed by the virtual environment component within a virtual environment. Suspicious network content can be identified as malicious network content based on a behavior for the virtual environment component. A computer readable storage medium can contain instructions executable by a processor for detecting malicious network content.


An embodiment processes network content by receiving suspicious network content. The suspicious network content is detected within a copy of network content communicated over a network. An agent is then configured to monitor processing of the suspicious network content within a virtual environment. At least one virtual environment component is configured to process the suspicious network content within the virtual environment. An agent can detect an anomaly associated with the virtual environment component. A signature is then generated from the suspicious network content to apply to subsequent network content.


An embodiment may include a system including a first module, a pool of virtual environment components, a scheduler and a replayer. The first module can access suspicious network content. The scheduler can retrieve a virtual environment component from the virtual environment pool. The virtual environment component can be configured to mimic a real application. The replayer processes the suspicious network content using the retrieved virtual environment component within a virtual environment.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary malicious network content detection environment.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary virtual environment component pool.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary virtual environment.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for detecting and processing malicious network content.



FIG. 5 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for configuring virtual environment components.



FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for replaying suspicious network content.



FIG. 7 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for detecting malicious network content.



FIG. 8 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for identifying and processing malicious network content.



FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an exemplary malicious network content detection device.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present technology utilizes one or more virtual environment components to analyze network content in a virtual environment. Network content can be monitored and analyzed using a set of heuristics. The heuristics can identify suspicious network content communicated over a network between two or more computing devices. The suspicious network content can further be analyzed in a virtual environment. The virtual environment may include one or more virtual environment components configured to mimic live environment components. The virtual environment components may include, for example, an application component such as a browser application component, an operating system component, a network component or some other component. The suspicious network content is replayed in the virtual environment using one or more of the virtual environment components. The virtual environment components can then be analyzed in view of their expected behavior. Malicious network content can be detected based on observed component behavior that deviates from an expected behavior. The malicious network content can then be identified and processed.


In some embodiments, a virtual environment component may be configured as a browser application. The virtual environment browser application can be configured to mimic a real browser application configured to receive and transmit network content being monitored. For example, a virtual environment browser application can be configured with software plug-ins, add-ons, preferences, proxy information, and settings associated with a real browser application that communicates over a network. The behavior of the virtual environment browser application is monitored while it is processing suspicious network content. When the actual or observed behavior of the virtual environment browser application differs from an expected behavior for the browser application, the suspicious network content processed by the virtual environment browser application can be designated as malicious network content. For example, when suspicious network content downloaded to a virtual environment browser application initiates a request to a remote server without using a designated browser application proxy, the network content can be designated as malicious.


In some embodiments, a virtual environment component may be configured as an operating system of a computer. The virtual environment operating system may be configured to mimic the appearance and performance of an operating system of a computer that processes network traffic. The virtual environment operating system can be monitored during processing of suspicious network content to determine if settings or parameters are improperly changed or the virtual environment operating system does not behave as expected. If the observed behavior does not match the expected behavior, the network content processed by the virtual environment operating system is identified as malicious network content. Furthermore, if a setting, parameter, or other aspect of the virtual environment operating system is changed (or attempted to be changed) improperly, the current detection system may immediately generate a signature and apply the signature against future network content. In some embodiments, a virtual environment component can include an agent that monitors and/or observes changes to a virtual operating system component. Details of virtual environment components are discussed in more detail below.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary malicious network content detection environment. The environment of FIG. 1 includes server 105 and client 110 communicating over network 120. Network tap 115 is also in communication with network 120 and may intercept communications sent over network 120, for example the communications between client 110 and server 105. Network tap 115 can generate a copy of the intercepted communications and provide the copied communications to malicious network content detection system 125.


Network 120 may be implemented as the Internet or other WAN, a LAN, intranet, extranet, private network, public network, combination of these, or other network or networks.


Server 105 provides a network service over network 120. In some embodiments when network 120 is implemented as the Internet, server 105 can provide a web service. Server 105 may include one or more applications 107 and operating system 109. In some embodiments, application 107 is a web application providing a web service over network 120. Operating system 109 may be an operating system suitable for use by a server, such as WINDOWS, LINUX, or NOVEL NETWARE operating system.


Client 110 may execute one or more applications 112 on operating system 114. In some embodiments, one or more applications on client 110 may utilize a service provided by server 105 over network 120. In some embodiments, client 110 may utilize a web service provided over network 120 by server 105. Application 112 may be any of several types of applications, such as a browser application, instant messaging application, e-mail application, an other application which can communicate over network 120 or is affected by network content communicated to or from client 110 over network 120. Operating system 114 may be any operating system suitable for a client 110, such as WINDOWS, UNIX, or other operating system.


Malicious network content detection system 125 includes heuristic module 130, heuristics database 135, scheduler 140, virtual environment component pool 145 and virtual environments 150. The system 125 receives a copy of network content from network tap 115. The network content may include, for example, network data. The network content is then provided to heuristic module 130 which applies heuristics to received network data. Heuristics module 130 may access the heuristics from heuristics database 135. When application of the heuristics indicates that one or more data packets of the network data have a suspicious characteristic or are otherwise suspicious, heuristic module 130 may provide the suspicious data packets to scheduler 140. In some embodiments, suspicious data packets include data packets that might contain malicious network content. Examples of malicious network content include a worm, virus, trojan horse or other malicious code. Scheduler 140 receives suspicious network content from heuristic module 130 and replays the suspicious network content in virtual environment 150. In some embodiments, “replay” of the suspicious network content includes processing the suspicious network content in a virtual environment 150 that is configured to mimic the real environment in which the network content was or was intended to be processed. Configuring the replay of suspicious network content can include retrieving one or more virtual environment components from virtual environment component pool 145, configuring the virtual components, providing the virtual components to virtual environment 150, and executing playback of the suspicious network data.


Virtual environment component pool 145 contains a pool of different component types, such as applications, operating systems, and other components. Virtual environment component pool 145 is discussed in more detail below with respect to FIG. 3. Virtual environment 150 is used to replay suspicious network content using one or more components. Virtual environment 150 is discussed in more detail below with respect to FIG. 2. The operation of exemplary embodiments of a heuristic module, heuristics database, and scheduler are discussed in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/263,971, filed on Nov. 3, 2008, titled, “Systems and Methods for Detecting Malicious Network Content”, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary virtual environment component pool. In some embodiments, the virtual environment component pool of FIG. 2 provides more detail for virtual environment component pool 145 illustrated in FIG. 1. Virtual environment component pool 145 includes virtual environment applications 205, virtual environment operating systems 210, virtual environment networks 215, and virtual environment agents 220.


Each of virtual environment applications 205 may be configured to appear and perform as a real application which processes or is affected by network data. Examples of virtual environment applications 205 include a browser application, such as “Internet Explorer” by Microsoft Corporation or “FireFox” by Mozilla, instant messaging application, client e-mail application, other applications that process data communicated over a network, and other applications. The virtual environment applications may be implemented as one or more templates of a type of application, or a specific instance of a particular application. The virtual environment applications can be retrieved, configured and used within one or more virtual environments 150. The behavior of the virtual environment applications can be monitored and compared to an expected behavior to determine whether or not any variances exist which may indicate malicious network content and/or data.


Virtual environment operating system 210 can be implemented to appear and perform as any of several widely known operating systems for computers which process network data, for example WINDOWS, UNIX, or other operating systems. The virtual environment operating system may be configured to mimic a real operating system and monitor to detect attempted changes and actual changes to the operating system which are unexpected.


Virtual environment agent 220 can detect changes in a virtual environment component, such as a virtual environment application or virtual environment operating system. In some embodiments, a virtual environment agent 220 may detect changes to a virtual environment component that are not made using a standard process, changes to virtual environment component settings that should not be changed, and other changes to a virtual environment component. For example, the virtual environment agent 200 may detect when a change is made to an operating system setting using a non-standard process.


Virtual environment network 215 may be implemented to include a virtual switch, an intranet, the Internet, or some other network. The virtual environment network 215 is configured with protocols that mimic the real network in which the network data is communicated.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary virtual environment. In some embodiments, the exemplary virtual environment of FIG. 3 provides more detail of virtual environment 150 of FIG. 1. Virtual environment 150 includes replayer 305, virtual environment network 310, virtual environment operating system 315, virtual environment applications 320-325, and virtual environment agent 330.


Replayer 305 replays network content in the virtual environment network 310 by receiving and transmitting communications with virtual environment operating system 315 over virtual environment network 310. The communications can be processed by virtual environment operating system 315 as well as by one or more virtual environment applications 320-325. In some embodiments, suspicious network data is processed by operating system 315 and virtual environment applications 320 and/or 325. Virtual environment network 310 may receive suspicious network data from replayer 305 and provide the suspicious network data to virtual environment operating system 315. Virtual operating system 315 may process the suspicious network content and optionally provide the suspicious network content to a virtual environment application. In some embodiments, virtual operating system 315 is configured to mimic a server or server applications, such as server 105, application 107 or operating system 109. Processing suspicious network content in a virtual environment is discussed in more detail below with respect to the method of FIG. 4.


Virtual environment network 310 may be retrieved from virtual environment component pool 145. The virtual environment network 310 may be implemented to include a switch or a gateway, or some other software implementation of a network which mimics an actual communications network. In some embodiments, the virtual environment network 310 may process and implement the transmission of data in a manner that simulates the processing and transmission of data by an actual network. In some embodiments, the communications processed through virtual environment network 310 are monitored. In some embodiments, implementing a virtual environment network 310 is optional, in which case replayer 305 communicates with virtual environment operating system 315 directly.


Virtual environment operating system 315 is configured to mimic (e.g., appear and perform in a similar manner) a real operating system, for example an operating system 114 for client 110 that processes data over network 120. In some embodiments, virtual environment operating system 315 is implemented as code that emulates an operating system and can interact with one or more virtual environment applications as an actual operating system would. In some embodiments, the virtual environment operating system is implemented as an actual operating system executing within a virtual environment.


Virtual environment operating system 315 may communicate data between virtual environment network 210 (or replayer 305) and one or more virtual environment applications. For example, virtual environment operating system 315 may receive requests from a virtual environment application, route the request to replayer 305, and route response data, for example suspicious network content data, from replayer 305 to virtual environment application 220 or 225, respectively. In some embodiments, communications, settings and other parameters aspects of the behavior of virtual environment operating system 315 within virtual environment 150 are monitored. In some embodiments, virtual environment operating system 315 is optional.


Virtual environment applications 320 and 325 are each configured to behave as an application that processes or is affected by network content on a client computer or server. For example, a virtual environment application may be implemented as code that emulates a real application to mimic the behavior of the real application, for example the behavior of application 112 on client 110. In some embodiments, a virtual environment application may be implemented as a copy of the actual application which is executed within the virtual environment.


Virtual environment applications can be configured and controlled to replicate the processing of suspicious content data. For example, when replaying suspicious content data, the virtual environment application can be controlled to submit a request for data over a virtual network. At least a portion of the suspicious content data is transmitted to the virtual environment application in response to the request. Replay of suspicious network data continues until the content data has been replayed in its entirety. The communications, settings and other aspects of the behavior of virtual environment applications within virtual environment 150 can be monitored.


One or more virtual environment agents 330 can be configured to monitor the behavior and/or state of one or more virtual environment components. In some embodiments, virtual environment component behavior can include requests for data, sending or receiving data over a network, processing and/or storing data, or other operations performed the component. In some embodiments, the virtual environment component state may include a “snapshot” of the virtual environment parameters and settings, for example values for components settings, status of a portion component portion (i.e., error conditions, interrupts, availability of a buffer), or values for settings or parameters for the component. For example, a virtual environment agent can monitor changes made to a virtual environment operating system 315. In some embodiments, if a setting is changed to an improper value or an improper procedure is used to change a setting to the operating system, the agent can detect the code associated with suspicious network content which performed the change.


In addition to the network, operating system, application, and agent components illustrated in virtual environment 150, other types of virtual environment components can be used within virtual environment 150 to process suspicious network data. For example, a virtual environment 150 may include virtual environment hardware to mimic a hardware protocol, ports, or other behavior of an actual hardware machine.


The exemplary methods of FIGS. 4-8 relate to detecting and processing malicious network content. Throughout the following discussion of FIGS. 4-8, examples are occasionally discussed which relate to virtual environment components comprising a browser application and an operating system. These exemplary references are for purposes of discussion only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present technology.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for detecting and processing malicious network content. The method of FIG. 4 begins with intercepting network content at step 405. Network tap 115 intercepts network content sent over network 120 between server 105 and client 110. After intercepting network content, suspicious network content is identified at step 410. Suspicious network content can be detected by heuristic module 130 as module 130 applies heuristics to network content provided by network tap 115. For example, if a heuristic applied by heuristic module 130 identifies a suspicious characteristic in the network content, then the network content is considered suspicious. Exemplary methods for detecting suspicious network content using heuristics and other methods are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/263,971, filed on Nov. 3, 2008, titled, “Systems and Methods for Detecting Malicious Network Content”, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


Virtual environment components and agents can be configured at step 415. Once identified, suspicious network data can be processed in a virtual environment by virtual environment components to determine if the suspicious content should be identified as malicious. In some embodiments, one or more virtual environment agents may be used to monitor the state or behavior of the virtual environment components. Scheduler 140 may configure virtual environment components by retrieving components from virtual environment component pool 145 and configuring the retrieved components to mimic real applications and other software. The agents can be configured to monitor the configured components. Configuring virtual environment components and agents is discussed in more detail below with respect to FIG. 5.


Suspicious network content is accessed at step 420. The suspicious network content includes the content identified at step 410 and may include data packets containing suspicious characteristics as well as related data packets. For example, suspicious network content may include data packets comprising the request which resulted in a response having a suspicious characteristic as well as additional data retrieved by the code containing the suspicious characteristic.


Suspicious network content is replayed using the virtual environment components at step 425. The suspicious network content is replayed within virtual environment 150 by replayer 305. In some embodiments, replaying virtual network content includes processing the suspicious network data by one or more virtual environment components within virtual environment 150. For example with respect to web page content having suspicious content, replayer 305 transmits the suspicious network content containing the suspicious characteristic to be processed by a virtual environment operating system and virtual environment browser application. The actual network content copied at step 405 is provided to the one or more of the virtual environment components illustrated in FIG. 3. More detail for replaying suspicious network content is discussed below with respect to the method of FIG. 6.


After replaying the suspicious network content, the virtual environment components are analyzed to detect malicious network content at step 430. In some embodiments, each virtual environment component is associated with an expected behavior. The expected behavior for a component is compared to the behavior observed for the virtual environment component as the component processed the suspicious network content. If there was a difference between the observed behavior and the expected behavior, the suspicious network content is determined to be malicious network content. More detail for detecting malicious network content by analyzing virtual environment component behavior is discussed in more detail below with respect to the method of FIG. 7.


After detecting malicious network content, the malicious network content is identified and processed at step 435. In some embodiments, an identifier is created for the malicious network content and further processing is performed to minimize damage resulting from the malicious network content. The further processing may include blocking subsequent network data that resembles the identified malicious network content, removing the malicious network content from one or more clients within a computer network, and other processing. Identifying and processing malicious network content is discussed in more detail below with respect to FIG. 8.



FIG. 5 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for configuring virtual environment components. In some embodiments, the method of FIG. 5 provides more detail for step 415 of the method of FIG. 4. First, components in a live environment are identified at step 505. The components may be identified on client 110, server 105, or some other machine (real or virtual) or environment that processes or is affected by network data communicated over network 120. The identification can be performed by scheduler 140 based on information in network data, a reporting server with information for one or more computers exposed to the network content (e.g., computers that transmit or receive the suspicious content), data stored locally on malicious network content detection system 125, or from some other source. Examples of real environment components include a browser application, electronic messaging client, instant messaging client, an operating system, or some other software or hardware on a machine that accesses network content.


Each of steps 510-530 can be performed by scheduler 140 within system 125. Virtual environment components are retrieved for the identified real environment components at step 510. The virtual environment component can be associated with types of applications, operating systems, or other code that can be executed in a real environment. The components can be retrieved by scheduler 140 from virtual environment component pool 145.


The one or more virtual environment components may be configured to mimic a real environment application at step 515. Scheduler 140 can configure the component to mimic the appearance and behavior of the real environment application. The configuration can be such that any suspicious code will not be able to detect a difference between the real component and the virtual environment component application. For example, a virtual environment network application 320 can be configured as Microsoft's “Internet Explorer” or Mozilla's “Firefox” browser application, wherein the component is configured with protocols, user preferences, proxy addresses, encryption preferences, add-in code, and other settings that can correspond to an actual browser application executing on client 110.


In some embodiments, rather than execute code that mimics the application, a copy of the actual application is executed within the virtual environment. Thus, the application is executed within a virtual operating system, configured with settings and parameters associated with a real application.


Virtual environment components can be configured to mimic a real environment operating system at step 520. The virtual environment operating system may be configured to mimic an operating system used to process network data communicated over network 120 by server 104 or client 110. For example, the component can be configured to mimic Microsoft's “Windows” operating system. The configuration may include setting a number of port addresses, settings, and other data.


Virtual environment components may then be configured to mimic the real environment network at step 525. Configuring a virtual environment component network may involve setting up protocols, and other features to mimic network 120. In some embodiments, the network may be configured as a virtual switch, relay station, or some other network system for relaying content data. The method of FIG. 5 then ends.


Virtual environment agents are retrieved and configured at step 530. A virtual environment agent can be implemented as code which monitors component behavior and settings in a virtual environment. The virtual environment agents may detect behaviors and changed settings as they occur and may detect whether the behaviors or setting changes are expected or unexpected. If unexpected, the suspicious network content which implemented or caused the change is identified as malicious. Identifying malicious code is discussed in more detail below.


In some embodiments, a virtual machine hardware component may be configured as well. In this case, the virtual machine hardware may be configured to mimic real hardware ports, settings, and other aspects of the actual hardware used to implement an operating system and application components.



FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for replaying suspicious network content. In some embodiments, the method of FIG. 6 provides more detail for step 425 of the method of FIG. 4. The discussion of the method of FIG. 6 will refer to an example regarding replaying network content using a browser application.


An initial request is replayed from a virtual environment application to a virtual environment operating system at step 605. In some embodiments, the initial request is configured based on network content (for example, consisting of network data packets) copied by network tap 115. For example, network content may be stored for period of time. When one or more network content data packets are determined to be suspicious, all network content associated with the suspicious data packets are retrieved and replayed. For example, network content provided to a network browser application in response to a request may contain suspicious data packets. Once data packets in the response are determined to be suspicious, the request which generated the response as well as other communications occurring after the response was received all retrieved in their entirety.


In some embodiments, the initial request is configured by replayer 305 or scheduler 140 and sent from the virtual environment application 320 to the replayer 305. Transmission of the initial request can result in virtual environment application behavior corresponding to the request. For example, for a network browser application, the request may initiate creating of a cookie associated with the request. The cookie can include a timestamp for and an identifier associated with the request, as well as creation of other data.


Suspicious network content is provided to a requesting virtual environment application at step 610. In response to the initial request in step 605, the network content is transmitted to the virtual environment application to replicate transmission of the network content to the requesting client in a real computing environment. For example, in reply to an HTTP request, the response may include HTTP packets, image data packets, and other content comprising a response to the request. The data packets comprising the response are transmitted to virtual operating system 315 by replayer 305 over virtual environment network 310. Virtual operating system 315 receives the content data, optionally processes the data, determines which virtual environment application that will receive the data, and “transmits” the content data to the virtual environment application. For a virtual network browser application, the content data is transmitted to the browser application to be loaded as a web page or other content.


In some embodiments, the network content is not provided to a virtual environment operating system, but rather directly to the virtual environment application.


The suspicious network content is then processed by the virtual environment application at step 615. For example, a virtual environment browser application may load web page data and image data, execute a script, or provide flash video as included in the response data packets.


When the received network content contains code that is malicious (although it may not yet be identified as malicious before it is executed), the content is processed by the virtual environment application just as it would be when the network content and malicious code would be executed by a real application. For example, malicious content may consist of code consisting of an executable. When executed by the virtual environment browser application, the executable code may attempt to transmit a message to a server, retrieve data within the local environment, change a setting in the virtual environment browser application, or perform some other operation.


While processing the suspicious network content, the virtual environment application, operating system, network and other virtual environment components are monitored by one or more virtual environment agents 330 at step 620. As suspicious network data is “replayed” by processing the network data by the virtual environment components, the behavior of each component can be detected, logged, stored, reported and/or otherwise monitored by an agent. One agent may monitor a single component or multiple components.


For example, a virtual environment agent may detect behavior in a virtual environment browser application. When the virtual environment browser receives and processes suspicious content data, the browser application may execute executable code within the data. The executable code may attempt to transmit a message over the virtual network (i.e., to replayer 305) improperly. For example, the executable may attempt to send a message directly to a server instead of using a proxy address specified by the virtual environment browser application. A virtual environment agent monitoring the browser application may detect all requests sent by the virtual browser application, and thereby detect the improper request which did not go to the proxy address.


A virtual environment agent may also detect changes to an operating system which are improper. For example, when executed by a virtual environment application, an executable or other code in received network content may change or attempt to change an operating system setting, value, or otherwise change the virtual environment operating system. The virtual environment agent may detect the change or attempted change by intercepting or monitoring all changes to the virtual environment operating system. As another example, the operating system may receive data to be stored. The data may comprise an executable, which may attempt to access information, control an application, or perform some other function. When data received by the operating system for storage is an executable or other executable code, the execution of the data is monitored by the agent to determine the effects of the data execution.


When monitoring data, a virtual environment agent may record information regarding the effects and identification of the suspicious network data when the data is being processed in the virtual environment. For example, the virtual environment agent may identify application and operating system settings and values affected by the suspicious network content, values before and after they are affected during processing of the suspicious network content, changes to processes such as an operating system “start-up” process, and other changes. The virtual environment agent may also identify a request made by the suspicious network content, including requests to transmit data over a network, requests for local data access, and other requests. This and other data may be stored and/or reported by the virtual environment agent for later processing.



FIG. 7 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for detecting malicious network content. In some embodiments, the method of FIG. 7 provides more detail for step 430 of the method of FIG. 4 and is performed by scheduler 140. First, expected behavior for a virtual environment component such as an application, operating system and/or network is accessed at step 705. The expected behavior data can be determined from stored behavior patterns associated with each component. The behavior patterns may be accessed locally or remotely by scheduler 140. For example, a stored behavior pattern for a virtual environment network browser can indicate that all requests to transmit over a network should be directed towards a proxy address specified by the virtual environment network browser. A stored behavior pattern for an operating system can indicate parameter values that should not be changed as well as code that should be invoked when attempting to change a particular parameter.


The actual behavior pattern of the virtual environment application or operating system is then compared with the expected behavior pattern for the application or operating system at step 710. The actual behavior may be retrieved from data stored by one or more virtual environment agents 330. For example, the expected behavior for transmitting a request by a virtual environment network browser can include sending a content request to a proxy address set within the network browser settings. The actual behavior may include a content request initiated by executable code in the suspicious network content that attempts to transmit a network request directly.


If a difference is detected between the actual behavior and expected behavior at step 715, the suspicious network content is identified and processed as malicious network content at step 720. Identifying and processing malicious network content is discussed in more detail below with respect to FIG. 8. After identifying and processing the malicious network content, the method of FIG. 7 continues to step 725. In some embodiments, the suspicious network data is flagged to be identified and processed later and the operation of the method of FIG. 7 continues to step 725.


If no difference is detected between the actual behavior and expected behavior at step 715, the actual behavior for a virtual environment operating system is compared to the expected behavior for the virtual environment operating system at step 725. For example, the expected behavior may involve a particular process changing an operating system parameter value, when the actual behavior may attempt to change the operating system parameter value without using the particular process. The actual behavior may involve an attempt to change the settings by code executed by an application. If any difference is detected between the actual behavior and the expected behavior for the virtual environment operating system, the suspicious network data associated with the actual behavior is identified and processed as malicious network content at step 735 and the method of FIG. 7 continues to step 740. If no difference is detected, the method of FIG. 7 continues to step 740.


The actual behavior is compared with expected behavior for a virtual environment network at step 740. If any difference is detected between the actual behavior and the expected behavior, the network data associated with the behavior is identified and processed as malicious network content and the process of FIG. 7 then ends. If no difference is detected, the suspicious network data is not identified as malicious network content.


In some embodiments, scheduler 140 can detect malicious content from the behavior of a virtual environment application, virtual environment operating system, or virtual environment network “on the fly” or instantly during replay of the suspicious content in the virtual environment rather than waiting until suspicious content replay has been completed. As suspicious content is replayed, scheduler 140 may compare each incremental behavior of a virtual environment application, operating system, or network to the corresponding next expected incremental behavior. If the next actual incremental behavior does not match the next expected incremental behavior, the suspicious content responsible for the actual behavior is immediately identified as malicious network content and the malicious network content is processed. By comparing the expected behavior and actual behavior during replay rather than after replay has completed, malicious network content can be identified during the replay of the suspicious content (i.e., “on the fly”) and subsequent occurrences of the malicious network content can be detected more quickly.



FIG. 8 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for identifying and processing malicious network content. In some embodiments, the method of FIG. 8 provides more detail for step 435 of the method of FIG. 4. First, an identifier is created for malicious network content at step 805. The identifier may be generated at least in part based on information within the malicious network data.


Network content data associated with malicious network content is then collected at step 810. The collected network content data associated with the malicious network content may include the data packets that include the identified malicious network content, code retrieved by the malicious network content, source information that provided the malicious network content, and other data.


After collecting network content data, a heuristic is generated to identify the subsequent malicious network content associated with the malicious content data at step 815. The heuristic is generated such that it may identify network data copied and provided by network tap 115. In some embodiments, the heuristic is a signature of the network content data. In some embodiments, the signature can include or be derived from data packets comprising the malicious network data, an identification of the application that processed the malicious data, a byte sequence of the malicious data, and other data that is capable of identifying the malicious network data within a stream of network data received over a network.


The generated heuristic is then provided to heuristic module 130 within system 125 at step 820. Once provided to heuristic module 130, the heuristic module 130 may apply the heuristic to network data retrieved by network tap 115 and provided to malicious network content detection system 125.


In some embodiments, a signature may be generated immediately upon detecting the malicious network content, such that the signature can be applied to subsequent network content with minimal delay. Generating and applying the signature immediately against subsequent network content enables the present system to provide real-time detection and protection against malicious network content. For example, if a virtual environment agent 330 detects that network content improperly changes a virtual environment operating system setting, the agent, scheduler, or heuristic module (or a combination of these) may generate a signature for the corresponding network content. The heuristic module may then apply the signature to subsequent network traffic copied by network tap 115. If any network content in subsequent network traffic matches the signature, the subsequent network traffic can be blocked or otherwise contained without affecting client 110.


In addition to providing heuristics against subsequent or future malicious network content, measures may be taken to remove the malicious network content from computing systems which have already been infected by the content. Script code is created for disinfecting live environment components at step 825. The script code is generated for the purpose of restoring a real environment component from damage caused by the malicious network content. The created script code is then distributed and executed among computers suspected of receiving the malicious network content at step 830.


Identifying and processing malicious network content is further discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/263,971, filed on Nov. 3, 2008, entitled, “Systems and Methods for Detecting Malicious Network Content”, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.



FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an exemplary malicious network content detection device. In some embodiments, the method of FIG. 9 provides more detail for system 125 in FIG. 1. The malicious network content detection system comprises at least one or more processors 905, memory system 910, and storage system 915, each of which can be coupled to a data bus 920. In some embodiments, data bus 920 may be implemented as one or more data buses. The malicious network content detection system may also comprise a communication network interface 925, an input/output (I/O) interface 930, and a display interface 935. The communication network interface 925 may couple with the network 120 via a communication medium 940. In some embodiments, the malicious network content detection system may couple to a network tap, such as the network tap 115, which in turn couples with the communication network 120. The bus 920 provides communications between the communications network interface 925, the processor 905, the memory system 910, the storage system 915, the I/O interface 930, and the display interface 935.


The communications network interface 925 may communicate with other digital devices (not shown) via the communications medium 540. The processor 905 executes instructions which may be stored on a processor readable storage medium. The memory system 910 may store data permanently or temporarily. Some examples of the memory system 910 include RAM and ROM. The storage system 915 also permanently or temporarily stores data. Some examples of the storage system 915 are hard disks and disk drives. The I/O interface 930 may include any device that can receive input and provide output to a user. The I/O interface 930 may include, but is not limited to, a keyboard, a mouse, a touch screen, a keypad, a biosensor, a compact disc (CD) drive, a digital versatile disc (DVD) drive, optical disk drive, or a floppy disk drive. The display interface 935 may include an interface configured to support a display, monitor, or screen. In some embodiments, the malicious network content detection system comprises a graphical user interface to be displayed to a user over a monitor in order to allow the user to control the malicious network content detection system.


The foregoing detailed description of the technology herein has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the technology to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The described embodiments were chosen in order to best explain the principles of the technology and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the technology in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the technology be defined by the claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. A computer implemented method for detecting malicious network content by a network content processing system, comprising: receiving network content detected to be suspicious;identifying a real application that is affected by the suspicious network content;providing a virtual environment component that is associated with the identified real application and selected from a virtual environment component pool to a virtual environment;configuring the virtual environment component within a virtual environment to mimic the identified real application to process the suspicious network content within the network content processing system, the virtual environment being one of a plurality of concurrently existing virtual environments within the network content processing system, each virtual environment of the concurrently existing virtual environments including a respective virtual environment operating system to process respective suspicious network content to detect whether the respective suspicious network content contains malicious network content;processing the suspicious network content using the virtual environment component within the virtual environment, the virtual environment component operating as a browser application which provides the suspicious network content for rendering as at least part of a content page; andidentifying the suspicious network content as malicious network content based on a behavior of the virtual environment component.
  • 2. The computer implemented method of claim 1, wherein the suspicious network content includes one or more data packets associated with a suspicious characteristic.
  • 3. The computer implemented method of claim 2, wherein the one or more data packets comprise a copy of an original group of one or more data packets configured to be processed at least in part by a real application executing within a real environment.
  • 4. The computer implemented method of claim 1, wherein the network content is a copy of network content.
  • 5. The computer implemented method of claim 1, wherein the virtual environment component comprises the virtual environment operating system.
  • 6. The computer implemented method of claim 5, further comprising monitoring changes to the virtual environment operating system by an agent, the suspicious network content identified as malicious network content based on detected improper changes to the virtual environment operating system.
  • 7. The computer implemented method of claim 1, wherein processing the suspicious network content includes determining an observed behavior of the virtual environment component differs from an expected behavior of the virtual environment component.
  • 8. The computer implemented method of claim 7, wherein the observed behavior includes one or more actions performed by executable code contained within the suspicious network content.
  • 9. The computer implemented method of claim 1, further comprising: generating a signature to identify subsequent network content that matches the malicious network content; andapplying the signature to subsequently received network content.
  • 10. The computer implemented method of claim 1, wherein the virtual environment component pool is located within the network content processing system.
  • 11. The computer implemented method of claim 1 wherein the virtual environment component pool comprises at least one of i), ii) and iii) below: i) each of the virtual environment operating system instances;ii) a plurality of virtual environment network instances;iii) a plurality of virtual environment agents each configurable to monitor behavior of a respective one or more virtual environment components within the virtual environment including the virtual environment component processing the suspicious network content.
  • 12. The computer implemented method of claim 1 wherein the virtual environment component is provided with a scheduler coupled to the virtual environment component pool.
  • 13. The computer implemented method of claim 12 further comprising: identifying the virtual environment component for providing to the virtual environment based on information obtained from one or more of a group of sources including information in network content, information from a reporting server on one or more computers exposed to the network content, and information stored within the network content processing system.
  • 14. The computer implemented method of claim 1 wherein the virtual environment component pool comprises a plurality of virtual environment agents each configurable to monitor state of a respective one or more virtual environment components within the virtual environment.
  • 15. The computer implemented method of claim 1 wherein the virtual environment operating system is implemented as code that emulates an operating system.
  • 16. A computer implemented method for processing network content by a network content processing system, comprising: receiving suspicious network content from a network interface, the suspicious network content associated with the network content communicated over a network;identifying a real application that is affected by the suspicious network content;providing a virtual environment component that is associated with the identified real application and selected from a virtual environment component pool to a virtual environment, the virtual environment component including a virtual environment operating system for the virtual environment;configuring an agent to monitor processing of the suspicious network content within the virtual environment and monitor changes to the virtual environment operating system;configuring the virtual environment component to mimic the real application to process the suspicious network content within the virtual environment, the virtual environment being one of a plurality of concurrently existing virtual environments, each virtual environment of the concurrently existing virtual environments to operate on respective suspicious network content from the network interface, each concurrently existing virtual environment including a respective virtual environment operating system to process respective suspicious network content to detect whether the respective suspicious network content contains malicious network content;detecting at least one anomaly associated with the virtual environment component using the agent, the at least one anomaly including improper changes to the virtual environment operating system of the virtual environment that identifies that the suspicious network content contains malicious network content; andgenerating a signature from the suspicious network content to apply to subsequent network content.
  • 17. The computer implemented method of claim 16, wherein the agent is further configured to monitor changes to the virtual environment operating system of the virtual environment.
  • 18. The computer implemented method of claim 16, wherein the agent is further configured to initiate generation of the signature based on detecting the at least one anomaly.
  • 19. The computer implemented method of claim 16, wherein the agent is further configured to monitor behavior of a virtual environment application within the virtual environment.
  • 20. The computer implemented method of claim 19, wherein the virtual environment application is configured to mimic a browser application.
  • 21. The computer implemented method of claim 19, wherein the virtual environment application is configured with a proxy address, wherein the agent is further configured to detect whether code within the suspicious network content and executed by the virtual environment application attempts to transmit data over a network without the proxy address.
  • 22. The computer implemented method of claim 16, wherein the virtual environment component pool is located within the network content processing system.
  • 23. The computer implemented method of claim 16 wherein the virtual environment component pool comprises at least one of i), ii) and iii) below: i) each of the virtual environment operating system instances;ii) a plurality of virtual environment network instances;iii) a plurality of virtual environment agents each configurable to monitor behavior of a respective one or more virtual environment components within the virtual environment including the virtual environment component during processing of the suspicious network content.
  • 24. The computer implemented method of claim 16 wherein the virtual environment component is provided with a scheduler coupled to the virtual environment component pool.
  • 25. The computer implemented method of claim 24 further comprising: identifying the virtual environment component for providing to the virtual environment based on information obtained from one or more of a group of sources including information in network content, information from a reporting server on one or more computers exposed to the network content, and information stored within the network content processing system.
  • 26. The computer implemented method of claim 16 wherein the virtual environment operating system is implemented as code that emulates an operating system.
  • 27. The computer implemented method of claim 16 wherein the virtual environment component pool comprises a plurality of virtual environment agents each configurable to monitor state of a respective one or more virtual environment components within the virtual environment.
  • 28. A system for detecting malicious network content, comprising: a network interface;a first module executable by a processor that accesses suspicious network content;a scheduler that identifies a real application that is affected by the suspicious network content, provides a virtual environment component that is associated with the real application and selected from a virtual environment component pool, configures the virtual environment component to mimic the real application and operate as a browser application which provides the suspicious network content for rendering as at least part of a content page, the virtual environment component part of a virtual environment, the virtual environment being one of a plurality of concurrently existing virtual environments, each virtual environment of the concurrently existing virtual environments including a respective virtual environment operating system and to process respective suspicious network content received from the network interface to process respective suspicious network content to detect whether the respective suspicious network content contains malicious network content; anda replayer that operates in combination with the virtual environment operating system of the virtual environment to process the suspicious network content.
  • 29. The system of claim 28, further comprising an agent configured to detect changes to the virtual environment component within the virtual environment.
  • 30. The system of claim 29, wherein the agent detects changes to the virtual environment operating system.
  • 31. The system of claim 29, wherein the agent is configured to detect unexpected changes by a process to the virtual environment component.
  • 32. The system of claim 29, wherein the agent is configured to detect unexpected changes to settings of the virtual environment component.
  • 33. The system of claim 29, wherein the agent is configured to detect unexpected changes by monitoring behavior of the virtual environment component including one or more of requests for data, sending or receiving data over a network, processing and/or storing data.
  • 34. The system of claim 29, wherein the agent is configured to monitor state of the virtual environment component, the state includes a snapshot of values representing settings and parameters of the virtual environment.
  • 35. The system of claim 34, wherein the values represent state and parameters including one or more of error conditions, interrupts, and availability of a buffer.
  • 36. The system of claim 29, wherein the agent resides in the virtual environment.
  • 37. The system of claim 29, wherein the agent is further configured to detect, log, store, and report behavior of the virtual environment component.
  • 38. The system of claim 29, wherein the agent is configured to detect behavior in the browser application being the virtual environment component.
  • 39. The system of claim 29, wherein, the virtual environment component operating as the browser application is configured to receive and process suspicious content data, and execute any executable code within the data.
  • 40. The system of claim 39, wherein the executable code attempts to transmit a message over a virtual network, including a request to a server.
  • 41. The system of claim 28, wherein the scheduler retrieves the virtual environment component operating as the browser application.
  • 42. The system of claim 28, wherein the scheduler enables the virtual-environment operating system.
  • 43. The system of claim 28, further comprising heuristics logic that generates a signature based on the suspicious network content and applies the signature to subsequent network content.
  • 44. The system of claim 28, wherein the virtual environment component pool is located within the system.
  • 45. The system of claim 28, wherein the virtual environment operating system is implemented as code that emulates an operating system.
  • 46. The system of claim 28, wherein the agent is configured to monitor changes made to the virtual environment operating system, including one or more of a setting changed to an improper value or an improper procedure used to change a setting to the virtual environment operating system, and to detect code associated with suspicious network content that performed the change.
  • 47. The system of claim 28, wherein the virtual environment is configured to include virtual hardware to mimic one or more of a hardware protocol, ports, and other behavior of real hardware.
  • 48. The system of claim 28, wherein the replayer replays network content in a virtual environment network by receiving and transmitting communications with the virtual environment operating system of the virtual environment over the virtual environment network.
  • 49. The system of claim 28, wherein the virtual environment is configured to process and implement transmission of the suspicious network content in a manner that simulates the processing and transmission of data by a real network.
  • 50. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium having stored thereon instructions executable by a processor for performing a method for detecting malicious network content, the method comprising: receiving suspicious network content from a network interface;identifying a real application that is affected by the suspicious network content;providing a virtual environment component that is associated with the real application and selected from a virtual environment component pool to a virtual environment, the virtual environment component operating as a browser application which provides the suspicious network content for rendering as at least part of a content page;configuring the virtual environment component within the virtual environment to mimic a real application to process the suspicious network content within the network content processing system, the virtual environment being one of a plurality of concurrently existing virtual environments, each virtual environment of the concurrently existing virtual environments including a respective virtual environment operating system and being communicatively coupled to the network interface to process respective suspicious content received from the network interface to process respective suspicious network content to detect whether the respective suspicious network content contains malicious network content;processing the suspicious network content by the virtual environment component within a virtual environment; andidentifying the suspicious network content as malicious network content based on a behavior for the virtual environment component.
  • 51. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 50, wherein the suspicious network content includes one or more data packets associated with a suspicious characteristic.
  • 52. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 50, wherein the method further comprises an agent that monitors changes to the virtual-environment operating system, the suspicious network content identified as malicious network content based on detected improper changes to the virtual environment operating system.
  • 53. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 50, wherein processing the suspicious network content includes determining that an observed behavior of the virtual environment component differs from an expected behavior of the virtual environment component.
  • 54. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 50, wherein the method further comprises: generating a signature to identify subsequent network content that matches the suspicious network content; andapplying the signature to subsequently received network content.
  • 55. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 50, wherein the virtual environment operating system is implemented as code that emulates an operating system.
  • 56. A computer implemented method for processing network content by a network content processing system, comprising: receiving suspicious network content from a network interface, the suspicious network content associated with the network content communicated over a network;identifying a real application that is affected by the suspicious network content;providing a virtual environment component that is associated with the identified real application and selected from a virtual environment component pool to a virtual environment, the virtual environment component operating as a browser application that renders the suspicious network content as at least part of a content page;configuring an agent to monitor processing of the suspicious network content within the virtual environment;configuring the virtual environment component to mimic the real application to process the suspicious network content within the virtual environment, the virtual environment being one of a plurality of concurrently existing virtual environments, each virtual environment of the concurrently existing virtual environments to operate on respective suspicious network content from the network interface, each concurrently existing virtual environment including a respective virtual environment operating system to process respective suspicious network content to detect whether the respective suspicious network content contains malicious network content;detecting at least one anomaly associated with the virtual environment component using the agent; andgenerating a signature from the suspicious network content to apply to subsequent network content.
  • 57. The computer implemented method of claim 56, wherein the virtual environment operating system is implemented as code that emulates an operating system.
  • 58. A system for detecting malicious network content, comprising: a network interface;a processor; anda memory coupled to the processor, the memory comprises software that, when executed by the processor, performs operations including: identifying a real application that is affected by suspicious network content received from the network interface, the suspicious network content communicated over a network;providing a virtual environment component that is associated with the identified real application and selected from a virtual environment component pool to a virtual environment, the virtual environment component being a virtual environment operating system of the virtual environment;configuring an agent to monitor processing of the suspicious network content within the virtual environment and monitor changes to the virtual environment operating system;configuring the virtual environment component to mimic the real application to process the suspicious network content within the virtual environment, the virtual environment being one of a plurality of concurrently existing virtual environments, each virtual environment associated with a respective virtual environment operating system to process suspicious network content to detect whether the suspicious network content contains malicious network content;detecting at least one anomaly associated with the virtual environment component using the agent, the at least one anomaly including improper changes to the virtual environment operating system of the virtual environment that identifies that the suspicious network content contains malicious network content; andgenerating a signature from the suspicious network content to apply to subsequent network content.
  • 59. The system of claim 58, further comprising an agent stored within the memory, the agent being configured to detect unexpected changes to settings of the virtual environment component.
  • 60. The system of claim 58, wherein the agent is further configured to initiate generation of the signature based on detecting the at least one anomaly.
  • 61. The system of claim 58, wherein the agent is further configured to monitor behavior of a virtual environment application within the virtual environment.
  • 62. The system of claim 61, wherein the agent is configured to detect unexpected changes in the monitored behavior of the virtual environment component including one or more of requests for data, sending or receiving data over a network, processing and/or storing data.
  • 63. The system of claim 58, wherein the agent is configured to monitor state of the virtual environment component, the state includes a snapshot of values representing settings and parameters of the virtual environment.
  • 64. The system of claim 63, wherein the values represent state and parameters including one or more of error conditions, interrupts, and availability of a buffer.
  • 65. The system of claim 58, wherein the agent resides in the virtual environment.
  • 66. The system of claim 58, wherein the virtual environment is configured to include virtual hardware to mimic one or more of a hardware protocol, ports, and other behavior of real hardware.
  • 67. The system of claim 58, wherein the virtual environment application is configured to mimic a browser application.
  • 68. The system claim 58, wherein the virtual environment operating system is implemented as code that emulates an operating system.
  • 69. The system of claim 58, wherein the agent is further configured to detect, log, store, and report behavior of the virtual environment component.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/409,355, filed Apr. 20, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,171,553, entitled “Heuristic Based Capture with Replay to Virtual Machine”, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/096,287, filed Mar. 31, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,528,086, entitled “System and Method of Detecting Computer Worms”, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/151,812, filed Jun. 13, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,549,638, entitled “System and Method of Containing Computer Worms,” and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/152,286, filed Jun. 13, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,006,305, entitled “Computer Worm Defense System and Method”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/096,287 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/559,198, filed Apr. 1, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/151,812 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/579,953, filed Jun. 14, 2004, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/152,286 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/579,910, filed Jun. 14, 2004.

US Referenced Citations (287)
Number Name Date Kind
4292580 Ott et al. Sep 1981 A
5175732 Hendel et al. Dec 1992 A
5440723 Arnold et al. Aug 1995 A
5657473 Killean et al. Aug 1997 A
5842002 Schnurer et al. Nov 1998 A
5978917 Chi Nov 1999 A
6088803 Tso et al. Jul 2000 A
6094677 Capek et al. Jul 2000 A
6269330 Cidon et al. Jul 2001 B1
6279113 Vaidya Aug 2001 B1
6298445 Shostack et al. Oct 2001 B1
6357008 Nachenberg Mar 2002 B1
6424627 Sørhaug et al. Jul 2002 B1
6484315 Ziese Nov 2002 B1
6487666 Shanklin et al. Nov 2002 B1
6493756 O'Brien et al. Dec 2002 B1
6550012 Villa et al. Apr 2003 B1
6775657 Baker Aug 2004 B1
6832367 Choi et al. Dec 2004 B1
6895550 Kanchirayappa et al. May 2005 B2
6898632 Gordy et al. May 2005 B2
6907396 Muttik et al. Jun 2005 B1
6981279 Arnold et al. Dec 2005 B1
7007107 Ivchenko et al. Feb 2006 B1
7028179 Anderson et al. Apr 2006 B2
7043757 Hoefelmeyer et al. May 2006 B2
7069316 Gryaznov Jun 2006 B1
7080408 Pak et al. Jul 2006 B1
7093239 van der Made Aug 2006 B1
7100201 Izatt Aug 2006 B2
7159149 Spiegel et al. Jan 2007 B2
7231667 Jordan Jun 2007 B2
7240364 Branscomb et al. Jul 2007 B1
7240368 Roesch et al. Jul 2007 B1
7251215 Turner et al. Jul 2007 B1
7287278 Liang Oct 2007 B2
7308716 Danford et al. Dec 2007 B2
7356736 Natvig Apr 2008 B2
7386888 Liang et al. Jun 2008 B2
7392542 Bucher Jun 2008 B2
7418729 Szor Aug 2008 B2
7428300 Drew et al. Sep 2008 B1
7441272 Durham et al. Oct 2008 B2
7448084 Apap et al. Nov 2008 B1
7458098 Judge et al. Nov 2008 B2
7464404 Carpenter et al. Dec 2008 B2
7464407 Nakae et al. Dec 2008 B2
7467408 O'Toole, Jr. Dec 2008 B1
7480773 Reed Jan 2009 B1
7487543 Arnold et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496960 Chen et al. Feb 2009 B1
7496961 Zimmer et al. Feb 2009 B2
7519990 Xie Apr 2009 B1
7523493 Liang et al. Apr 2009 B2
7530104 Thrower et al. May 2009 B1
7540025 Tzadikario May 2009 B2
7565550 Liang et al. Jul 2009 B2
7603715 Costa et al. Oct 2009 B2
7607171 Marsden et al. Oct 2009 B1
7639714 Stolfo et al. Dec 2009 B2
7644441 Schmid et al. Jan 2010 B2
7676841 Sobchuk et al. Mar 2010 B2
7698548 Shelest et al. Apr 2010 B2
7707633 Danford et al. Apr 2010 B2
7779463 Stolfo et al. Aug 2010 B2
7784097 Stolfo et al. Aug 2010 B1
7832008 Kraemer Nov 2010 B1
7849506 Dansey et al. Dec 2010 B1
7877803 Enstone et al. Jan 2011 B2
7904959 Sidiroglou et al. Mar 2011 B2
7908660 Bahl Mar 2011 B2
7930738 Petersen Apr 2011 B1
7937761 Bennett May 2011 B1
7996556 Raghavan et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996836 McCorkendale et al. Aug 2011 B1
7996905 Arnold et al. Aug 2011 B2
8006305 Aziz Aug 2011 B2
8010667 Zhang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8020206 Hubbard et al. Sep 2011 B2
8028338 Schneider et al. Sep 2011 B1
8045458 Alperovitch et al. Oct 2011 B2
8069484 McMillan et al. Nov 2011 B2
8087086 Lai et al. Dec 2011 B1
8171553 Aziz et al. May 2012 B2
8201246 Wu et al. Jun 2012 B1
8204984 Aziz et al. Jun 2012 B1
8220055 Kennedy Jul 2012 B1
8225288 Miller et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225373 Kraemer Jul 2012 B2
8234709 Viljoen et al. Jul 2012 B2
8239944 Nachenberg et al. Aug 2012 B1
8286251 Eker et al. Oct 2012 B2
8291499 Aziz et al. Oct 2012 B2
8307443 Wang et al. Nov 2012 B2
8312545 Tuvell et al. Nov 2012 B2
8321936 Green et al. Nov 2012 B1
8321941 Tuvell et al. Nov 2012 B2
8365286 Poston Jan 2013 B2
8375444 Aziz et al. Feb 2013 B2
8381299 Stolfo et al. Feb 2013 B2
8402529 Green et al. Mar 2013 B1
8510827 Leake et al. Aug 2013 B1
8516593 Aziz Aug 2013 B2
8528086 Aziz Sep 2013 B1
8539582 Aziz et al. Sep 2013 B1
8549638 Aziz Oct 2013 B2
8561177 Aziz et al. Oct 2013 B1
8566946 Aziz et al. Oct 2013 B1
8584094 Dadhia et al. Nov 2013 B2
8584239 Aziz et al. Nov 2013 B2
8595834 Xie et al. Nov 2013 B2
8635696 Aziz Jan 2014 B1
8713681 Silberman et al. Apr 2014 B2
20010005889 Albrecht Jun 2001 A1
20010047326 Broadbent et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020018903 Kokubo et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020038430 Edwards et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020091819 Melchione et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020144156 Copeland, III Oct 2002 A1
20020162015 Tang Oct 2002 A1
20020166063 Lachman et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184528 Shevenell et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188887 Largman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194490 Halperin et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030074578 Ford et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030084318 Schertz May 2003 A1
20030115483 Liang Jun 2003 A1
20030188190 Aaron et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200460 Morota et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212902 Van der Made Nov 2003 A1
20030237000 Denton et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040003323 Bennett et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015712 Szor Jan 2004 A1
20040019832 Arnold et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040047356 Bauer Mar 2004 A1
20040083408 Spiegel et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093513 Cantrell et al. May 2004 A1
20040111531 Staniford et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040165588 Pandya Aug 2004 A1
20040236963 Danford et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243349 Greifeneder et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249911 Alkhatib et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040255161 Cavanaugh Dec 2004 A1
20040268147 Wiederin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021740 Bar et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033960 Vialen et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050033989 Poletto et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050050148 Mohammadioun et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050086523 Zimmer et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091513 Mitomo et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091533 Omote et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050114663 Cornell et al. May 2005 A1
20050125195 Brendel Jun 2005 A1
20050157662 Bingham et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050183143 Anderholm et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050201297 Peikari Sep 2005 A1
20050210533 Copeland et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050238005 Chen et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050265331 Stolfo Dec 2005 A1
20060010495 Cohen et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015715 Anderson Jan 2006 A1
20060021054 Costa et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060031476 Mathes et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047665 Neil Mar 2006 A1
20060070130 Costea et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060075496 Carpenter et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095968 Portolani et al. May 2006 A1
20060101516 Sudaharan et al. May 2006 A1
20060101517 Banzhof et al. May 2006 A1
20060117385 Mester et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060123477 Raghavan et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143709 Brooks et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060150249 Gassen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161983 Cothrell et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161987 Levy-Yurista Jul 2006 A1
20060161989 Reshef et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060164199 Gilde et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173992 Weber et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060179147 Tran et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184632 Marino et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060191010 Benjamin Aug 2006 A1
20060221956 Narayan et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242709 Seinfeld et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060251104 Koga Nov 2006 A1
20060288417 Bookbinder et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070006288 Mayfield et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070006313 Porras et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070011174 Takaragi et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016951 Piccard et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070033645 Jones Feb 2007 A1
20070038943 FitzGerald et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070064689 Shin et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070094730 Bhikkaji et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070143827 Nicodemus et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156895 Vuong Jul 2007 A1
20070157180 Tillmann et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070157306 Elrod et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070171824 Ruello et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174915 Gribble et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070192500 Lum Aug 2007 A1
20070192858 Lum Aug 2007 A1
20070198275 Malden et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070240218 Tuvell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070240219 Tuvell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070240220 Tuvell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070240222 Tuvell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250930 Aziz et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070271446 Nakamura Nov 2007 A1
20080005782 Aziz Jan 2008 A1
20080072326 Danford et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080077793 Tan et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080080518 Hoeflin et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080098476 Syversen Apr 2008 A1
20080120722 Sima et al. May 2008 A1
20080134334 Kim et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080141376 Clausen et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080184373 Traut et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080189787 Arnold et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215742 Goldszmidt et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222729 Chen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080263665 Ma et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080295172 Bohacek Nov 2008 A1
20080301810 Lehane et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080307524 Singh et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080320594 Jiang Dec 2008 A1
20090007100 Field et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090013408 Schipka Jan 2009 A1
20090031423 Liu et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036111 Danford et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044024 Oberheide et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044274 Budko et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090083369 Marmor Mar 2009 A1
20090083855 Apap et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090089879 Wang et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094697 Provos et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090125976 Wassermann et al. May 2009 A1
20090126015 Monastyrsky et al. May 2009 A1
20090126016 Sobko et al. May 2009 A1
20090133125 Choi et al. May 2009 A1
20090158430 Borders Jun 2009 A1
20090193293 Stolfo et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090199296 Xie et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090228233 Anderson et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090241187 Troyansky Sep 2009 A1
20090241190 Todd et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090265692 Godefroid et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271867 Zhang Oct 2009 A1
20090300761 Park et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090328185 Berg et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090328221 Blumfield et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100017546 Poo et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100043073 Kuwamura Feb 2010 A1
20100054278 Stolfo et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100058474 Hicks Mar 2010 A1
20100077481 Polyakov et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100083376 Pereira et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100115621 Staniford et al. May 2010 A1
20100132038 Zaitsev May 2010 A1
20100154056 Smith et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100192223 Ismael et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100251104 Massand Sep 2010 A1
20100281102 Chinta et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100281541 Stolfo et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100281542 Stolfo et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287260 Peterson et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110041179 Stahlberg Feb 2011 A1
20110047594 Mahaffey et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047620 Mahaffey et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110078794 Manni et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110093951 Aziz Apr 2011 A1
20110099633 Aziz Apr 2011 A1
20110145920 Mahaffey et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110247072 Staniford et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110307955 Kaplan et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110314546 Aziz et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120079596 Thomas et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120084859 Radinsky et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120117652 Manni et al. May 2012 A1
20120174186 Aziz et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120174218 McCoy et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120222121 Staniford et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120297489 Dequevy Nov 2012 A1
20130036472 Aziz Feb 2013 A1
20130227691 Aziz et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130246370 Bartram et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130263260 Mahaffey et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130291109 Staniford et al. Oct 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
2439806 Jan 2008 GB
0206928 Jan 2002 WO
0223805 Mar 2002 WO
WO-2008041950 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2012145066 Oct 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (51)
Entry
IEEE Xplore Digital Library Search results for “detection of unknown computer worms”. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/searchresult.jsp?SortField=Score&SortOrder=desc&ResultC . . . Accessed on Aug. 28, 2009.
AltaVista Advanced Search Results. “Event Orchestrator”. http://www.altavista.com/web/results?itag=ody&pg=aq&aqmode=s&aqa=Event+Orchestrator . . . Accessed on Sep. 3, 2009.
AltaVista Advanced Search Results. “attack vector identifier”. http://www.altavista.com/web/results?itag=ody&pg=aq&aqmode=s&aqa=attack+vector+ide . . . Accessed on Sep. 15, 2009.
Whyte et al. “DNS—Based Detection of Scannin Works in an Enterprise Network,” Proceedings of the 12th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, Feb. 2005. 15 pages.
Kristoff, J. “Botnets, Detection and Mitigation: DNS—Based Techniques,” NU Security Day 2005, 23 pages.
Costa, M. et al. “Vigilante: End-to-End Containment of Internet Worms,” SOSP '05, Oct. 23-26, 2005, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., Brighton U.K.
Chaudet, C. et al. “Optimal Positioning of Active and Passive Monitoring Devices,” International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies, Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Conference on Emerging Network Experiment and Technology, Oct. 2005, pp. 71-82, CoNEXT '05, Toulousse, France.
Crandall, J.R. et al., “Minos:Control Data Attack Prevention Orthognal to Memory Model,” 37th International Symposium on Microarchitecture, Dec. 2004, Portland, Oregon.
Kim, H. et al., “Autograph: Toward Automated, Distributed Worm Signature Detection,” Proceedings of the 13th Usenix Security Symposium (Security 2004), Aug. 2004, pp. 271-286, San Diego.
Kreibich, J. et al., “Honeycomb—Creating Intrusion Detection Signatures Using Honeypots” 2nd Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-11), 2003, Boston, USA.
Newsome, J. et al., “Polygraph: Automatically Generating Signatures for Polymorphic Worms,” In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, May 2005.
Newsome, J. et al., “Dynamic Taint Analysis for Automatic Detection, Analysis, and Signature Generation of Exploits on Commodity Software,” In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Network and Distributed System Security, Symposium (NDSS '05), Feb. 2005.
Singh, S. et al., “Automated Worm Fingerprinting,” Proceedings of the ACM/USENIX Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation, Dec. 2004, San Francisco, California.
Margolis, P.E., “Computer & Internet Dictionary 3rd Edition,” ISBN 0375603519, Dec. 1998.
Silicon Defense, “Worm Containment in the Internal Network”, Mar. 2003, pp. 1-25.
Nojiri, D. et al., “Cooperative Response Strategies for Large Scale Attack Mitigation”, DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition, Apr. 22-24, 2003, vol. 1, pp. 293-302.
Moore, D. et al., “Internet Quarantine: Requirements for Containing Self-Propagating Code”, INFOCOM, Mar. 30-Apr. 3, 2003, vol. 3, pp. 1901-1910.
Williamson, Matthew M., “Throttling Viruses: Restricting Propagation to Defeat Malicious Mobile Code”, ACSAC Conference, Dec. 2002, Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 1-9.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 10, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US12/21916.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 25, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US12/26402.
Cisco, Configuring the Catalyst Switched Port Analyzer (SPAN) (“Cisco”), (1992-2003 Cisco Systems).
Reiner Sailer, Enriquillo Valdez, Trent Jaeger, Roonald Perez, Leendert van Doorn, John Linwood Griffin, Stefan Berger., sHype: Secure Hypervisor Appraoch to Trusted Virtualized Systems (Feb. 2, 2005) (“Sailer”).
Excerpt regarding First Printing Date for Merike Kaeo, Designing Network Security (“Kaeo”), (Copyright 2005).
The Sniffers's Guide to Raw Traffic available at: yuba.stanford.edu/˜casado/pcap/section1.html, (Jan. 6, 2014).
“Network Security: NetDetector—Network Intrusion Forensic System (NIFS) Whitepaper”, (“NetDetector Whitepaper”), (Copyright 2003).
“Packet”, Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Microsoft Press, (Mar. 2002), 1 page.
When Virtual is Better Than Real, IEEEXplore Digital Library, available at, http://ieeeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?reload=true&arnumber=990073, (Dec. 7, 2013).
Adetoye, Adedayo , et al., “Network Intrusion Detection & Response System”, (“Adetoye”), (Sep. 2003).
Baecher, “The Nepenthes Platform: An Efficient Approach to collect Malware”, Springer-verlag Berlin Heidelberg, (2006), pp. 165-184.
Bayer, et al., “Dynamic Analysis of Malicious Code”, J Comput Virol, Springer-Verlag, France., (2006), pp. 67-77.
Boubalos, Chris , “extracting syslog data out of raw pcap dumps, seclists.org, Honeypots mailing list archives”, available at http://seclists.org/honeypots/2003/q2/319 (“Boubalos”), (Jun. 5, 2003).
Cohen, M.I. , “PyFlag—An advanced network forensic framework”, Digital investigation 5, Elsevier, (2008), pp. S112-S120.
Distler, “Malware Analysis: An Introduction”, SANS Institute InfoSec Reading Room, SANS Institute, (2007).
Dunlap, George W. , et al., “ReVirt: Enabling Intrusion Analysis through Virtual-Machine Logging and Replay”, Proceeding of the 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, USENIX Association, (“Dunlap”), (Dec. 9, 2002).
Hjelmvik, Erik , “Passive Network Security Analysis with NetworkMiner”, (In)Secure, Issue 18, (Oct. 2008), pp. 1-100.
Kaeo, Merike , “Designing Network Security”, (“Kaeo”),(Nov. 2003).
King, Samuel T., et al., “Operating System Support for Virtual Machines”, (“King”).
Krasnyansky, Max , et al., Universal TUN/TAP driver, available at https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/tuntap.txt (2002) (“Krasnyansky”).
Liljenstam, Michael et al., “Simulating Realistic Network Traffic for Worm Warning System Design and Testing”, Institute for Security Technology studies, Dartmouth College, (“Liljenstam”), (Oct. 27, 2003).
Marchette, David J., “Computer Intrusion Detection and Network Monitoring: A Statistical Viewpoint”, (“Marchette”), (2001).
Natvig, Kurt , “SANDBOXII: Internet”, Virus Bulletin Conference, (“Natvig”), (Sep. 2002).
Peter M. Chen, and Brian D. Noble, “When Virtual Is Better Than, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science”, University of Michigan (“Chen”).
Spitzner, Lance , “Honeypots: Tracking Hackers”, (“Spizner”),(Sep. 17, 2002).
Thomas H. Ptacek, and Timothy N. Newsham, “Insertion, Evasion, and Secure Denial of Service: Eluding Network Intrusion Detection”, Secure Networks, (“Ptacek”), (Jan. 1998).
Venezia, Paul, “NetDetector Captures Intrusions”, InfoWorld Issue 27, (“Venezia”), (Jul. 14, 2003).
Aura, Tuomas, Thomas A. Kuhn, and Michael Rose. “Scanning electronic documents for personally identifiable information.” Proceedings of the 5th ACM workshop on Privacy in electronic society. ACM, 2006.
Filiol, Eric, et al. “Combinational Optimisation of Worm Propagation on an Unknown Network,” International Journal of Computer Science 2.2 (2007).
Deutsch, P. And J.L. Gailly. “Zlib compressed data format specification version 3.3”, RFC 1950, (1996).
Net BIOS Working Group. Protocol Standard for a NetBIOS Service on a TCP/UDP transport: Concepts and Methods. STD 19, RFC 1001, Mar. 1987.
Abdullah, et al., Visualizing Network Data for Intrusion Detection, 2005 IEEE Workshop on Information Assurance and Security, pp. 100-108.
Goel, et al., Reconstructing System State for Intrusion Analysis, Apr. 2008 SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, vol. 42 Issue 3, pp. 21-28.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100192223 A1 Jul 2010 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
60579910 Jun 2004 US
60559198 Apr 2004 US
60579953 Jun 2004 US
Continuation in Parts (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 11409355 Apr 2006 US
Child 12359252 US
Parent 11152286 Jun 2005 US
Child 11409355 US
Parent 11096287 Mar 2005 US
Child 11409355 US
Parent 11151812 Jun 2005 US
Child 11409355 US