Detecting proximity using antenna feedback

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9769769
  • Patent Number
    9,769,769
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 30, 2014
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 19, 2017
    6 years ago
Abstract
An electronic device provides a detuning monitor circuit configured to detect a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between a radio frequency (RF) transmitter and an RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline and a proximity detector circuit configured to adjust transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. Network proximity detectors are also provided to allow coordination of antenna subsystems to comply with specific absorption rate (SAR) constraints and/or maintain/improve antenna performance.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates an example electronic device that provides for dynamic power adjustment of a transmitted carrier wave responsive to a detected change in VSWR between the antenna and the transmitter connected to the antenna.



FIG. 2 illustrates example electrical components and data flows for a wireless transmission system with a mechanism for dynamic transmission power adjustment.



FIG. 3 illustrates another example electrical components and data flows for a wireless transmission system with a mechanism for dynamic transmission power adjustment.



FIG. 4 illustrates an example network of antenna subsystems in an electronic device.



FIG. 5 illustrates an example illustrates a Smith chart showing a region satisfying a predefined acceptable VSWR condition.



FIG. 6 illustrates example operations for a wireless transmission system with dynamic transmission power adjustment.



FIG. 7 illustrates alternative example operations for a wireless transmission system with dynamic transmission power adjustment.







DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS

Consumer electronic devices may be equipped with wireless communication circuitry that makes use of radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. For example, the wireless communications circuitry may transmit and receive RF signals in mobile telephone RF bands, WiFi network RF bands, GPS RF bands, near-field communication (NFC) bands, and other RF bands that may be associated with a telecommunications specification. To protect humans from harmful levels of RF radiation when using such devices, government agencies have imposed regulations limiting RF transmission power from some wireless electronic devices, such as tablet computers and mobile phones. Reducing RF transmission power may utilize valuable resources in mobile devices and decrease performance of device features in some electronic devices.


In some jurisdictions, specific absorption rate (SAR) specifications are in place imposing maximum energy absorption constraints on electronic device manufacturers. These specifications articulate restrictions on the amount of electromagnetic radiation that may be emitted based on proximity of a transmitting radio frequency (RF) antenna. Particular attention is given to radiation limits at distances within a few centimeters from the device (e.g., 0-3 centimeters), where users are likely to place a human body part near the transmitting antenna. Such restrictions may be satisfied by reducing transmitted carrier signal strength when a dielectric body (e.g., a human body part) is detected in the proximity of the transmitter.


Implementations of the disclosed technology provide an electronic device that dynamically alters the power of a transmitted carrier wave responsive to detected changes in the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between an antenna and a transmitter connected to the antenna. A user in proximity of the antenna influences the tuning of the antenna in a detectable manner, allowing for the dynamic power alteration that achieves compliance with SAR specifications without significantly compromising performance of the electronic device.



FIG. 1 illustrates an example electronic device 100 that provides for dynamic power adjustment of a transmitted carrier wave responsive to a detected change in VSWR between the antenna 102 and the transmitter 104 connected to the antenna 102. Four antennas 102, 106, 108, and 110 are shown in FIG. 1 along with their corresponding transmitters 104, 112, 114, and 116. In one implementation, the first inner antenna 102 and the second inner antenna 108 are substantially identical and operate in a first frequency band, while the first outer antenna 106 and the second outer antenna 110 are substantially identical and operate in a second frequency band. For example, the first inner antenna 102 and the second inner antenna 108 may receive and send radio signals over a wireless local area network. The wireless local area network may be based on the IEEE 802.11 specification, or other industry-standard specification. The IEEE 802.11 (i.e., “WiFi”) may operate in two frequency bands, the first being 2400 to 2500 MHz and the second being 5725 to 5875 MHz. In the same or another implementation, the first outer antenna 106 and the second outer antenna 110 receive and send radio signals in a frequency band allocated for cellular transmissions, or approximately 0.7 to 2.7 GHz. These frequency bands may correspond with communications specifications including, for example, LTE, WiMax, 4G, 3G, 2G, Bluetooth, IEEE 802.11, Near-field communication (NFC), RFID, and others. Operational frequency bands for individual antennas are based in part on the antenna properties and the corresponding transmitter carrier wave delivered to the antenna.


In the example of FIG. 1, the inner antenna pair 102 and 108 and outer antenna pair 106 and 110 operate to monitor proximity of a conductive body 110 (such as a human body part) and to dynamically adjust the transmission power emanating from the antenna in the proximity of the conductive body 110. In this manner, the electronic device 100 may comply with SAR constraints and protect a human user from excessive RF wave absorption.


Between each transmitter-antenna pair is a detuning monitor, such as detuning monitor circuits 118, 120, 122, and 124, used to monitor the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between the input and output of the detuning monitor, referred to as the input-output VSWR. Generally, the VSWR represents the voltage ratio between a maximum standing wave amplitude at one node to the minimum standing wave amplitude at another node. As such, the detuning monitor circuit 118 detects changes in the VSWR between an input node (e.g., from an input node coupled to the transmitter 112) and an output node (e.g., an output node coupled to the antenna 106).


When compared to a baseline input-output VSWR (e.g., measured under conditions in which a conductive body is not within effective proximity of the transmitting antenna or some other appropriate baseline), a difference between the baseline VSWR and continuously or periodically measured VSWR values can be tested by a proximity detector (such as proximity detector circuits 126, 128, 130, or 132) to determine whether the difference fails to satisfy a predetermined acceptable VSWR condition. Using an example antenna subsystem 133 including the detuning monitor circuit 120, the antenna 102, the proximity detector circuit 128, and the RF transmitter 104, failure to satisfy the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to the baseline VSWR, indicates an unacceptable proximity 134 of the conductive body 110 to the antenna 102. When the proximity detector circuit 128 detects this state, the proximity detector circuit 128 adjusts the transmission power from the corresponding transmitter 104 to satisfy SAR constraints (e.g., reducing the transmission power while the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition is not satisfied). Similar operations and coupling structures may be applied to the other antenna subsystems 131, 135, and 137 shown in FIG. 1.


In this manner, proximity detector circuit 128 closes a feedback loop. The proximity detector circuit 128 may be controlled by a control unit, such as a processor or controller programmed with firmware or software, or state machine implemented with digital memory and logic (not shown). The control unit may provide control signals to the proximity detector circuit 128 to communicate when the proximity detector circuit 128 shall take a proximity measurement and by how much the transmission power shall be decreased in response to a non-compliant SAR condition. The time delay between successive measurements and power reductions may be dynamically selected to account for quickly changing conditions, e.g., a rapidly approaching hand or a static situation, for example, in which a device is set on a table without any persons in proximity. As an alternative to separate control unit, the control functionality may be integrated in proximity circuit 128.


Proximity detector circuit 128 may be constructed from analog or digital circuits, or a combination of both digital and analog circuits. Proximity detector circuit 128 may include one or more analog-to-digital converters to convert the standing wave voltage signals to digital data, which is then compared, for example, by measuring VSWR, to determine proximity. A look-up table may provide the association between VSWR and physical proximity. Alternative, a formula relating VSWR to proximity may be programmed into the control unit or proximity detector circuit 128. Additionally processing of the measured VSWR may be performed, such as, for example, filtering or integrating measurements over time.


Antenna subsystems 131 and 137 are coupled (see coupling 140) to allow the proximity detectors 126 and 132 to communicate proximity parameters (e.g., a VSWR stream, status relative to the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition, etc.). As such, the antenna subsystems can 131 and 137 can work in concert to satisfy SAR constraints and/or improve antenna performance in the presence of an unacceptable proximity condition. For example, if the antenna subsystem 131 detects an unacceptable proximity condition but the antenna subsystems 137 detects an acceptable proximity condition (i.e., the predetermined acceptable proximity condition is satisfied), the subsystems 131 and 137 can communicate across the coupling 140 to coordinate a decrease in transmission power at the transmitter 112 and an increase at the transmitter 116. In this manner, the reduction in transmission power at transmitter 112, due to SAR constraints, may be offset to some extent by an increase in transmission power at the transmitter 116, thereby balancing transmission power based on proximity detection among multiple transmitters. Such a network of antenna subsystems may be expanded to more than two subsystems (e.g., to antenna subsystems at all four corners of a tablet computer system). The antenna subsystem 133 and 135 can cooperate in a similar fashion via the coupling 142. In an implementation antenna subsystems for different frequency ranges may also be coordinated to obtain a wider range and/or finer resolution of proximity detection (e.g., if all four antenna subsystems 131, 133, 135, and 137 are networked to cooperate, proximity may be detected across the entire length of the top of the electronic device 100.


The predetermined acceptable proximity condition for the amplified antenna subsystem (e.g., antenna subsystem 137) may be adjusted according to transmission power. As such, if the transmission power of the transmitter 116 is increased, the predetermined acceptable proximity condition may be adjusted to satisfy SAR constraints in the presences of increased transmission power. Such adjustments may, for example, be predetermined and stored in a data table accessible to the proximity detector circuit 124 (e.g., having different predetermined acceptable proximity conditions for different transmission powers).


Furthermore, antenna subsystem coordination may be used to identify false positives (e.g., circumstances in which the proximity condition is not subject to SAR constraints, such as when the computing device is laid flat on a metal table). For example, SAR testing conditions may address a single antenna subsystem one-at-a-time, where coordinating antenna subsystems may determine that a failure of four coordinated antenna subsystems (e.g., across the top edge of the electronic device 100 or at four corners of the electronic device 100) implies the proximity of a metal surface as opposed to hands or a head of a human. Under such conditions, the proximity detectors may determine that the proximity detection is a false positive, relative to human safety and SAR constraints, and therefore determine that a reduction in transmission power is not appropriate. Other similar conditions may be applied depending on SAR conditions tested, antenna subsystem locations, and the configuration and structure of the electronic device 100.



FIG. 2 illustrates example electrical components and data flows for a wireless transmission system 200 with a mechanism for dynamic transmission power adjustment. The wireless transmission system 200 includes a radio frequency (RF) transmitter 202, a transmitting antenna 204, a detuning monitor 206, and a proximity detector 208. RF transmitter 202 may be a power amplifier with a variable gain control input. The transmit power of RF transmitter 202 may be based on the signal provided to the gain control input. The detuning monitor 206 includes a coupler 210 (e.g., a directional coupler). In an example implementation, a directional coupler may be constructed from two coupled transmission lines between an RF transmitter interface 212 and an RF antenna interface 214. The coupled transmission lines are routed close enough that transmission characteristics (e.g., power, phase, and other RF parameters.) passing through one transmission line is coupled to the other transmission line, allowing the transmission characteristics passing through the RF transmitter interface 212 and the transmission characteristics passing through the RF antenna interface 214 to be measured by the proximity detector 208. Proximity of a conductive body 201 may be indicated by changes in reflection of the transmitted signal via coupling with the conductive body 201 moving into proximity of the RF transmitting antenna 204. Alternatively, these changes may be referred to as being indicative of detuning of the RF transmitting antenna 204 by the proximity of the conductive body 201.


The proximity detector 208 detects the measured transmission characteristics at the input (e.g., RF transmitter interface 212) and at the output (e.g., RF antenna interface 214) to determine a measured VSWR. If the measured VSWR satisfies the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to a baseline VSWR, then the proximity detector 208 signals the RF transmitter 202 to transmit at its standard power (or at some other power condition that is appropriate when an unacceptable proximity condition is not detected). If the measured VSWR does not satisfy the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to a baseline VSWR, then the proximity detector 208 signals the RF transmitter 202 to adjust its transmission power to a level set to satisfy the SAR constraints.



FIG. 3 illustrates another example electrical components and data flows for a wireless transmission system 300 with a mechanism for dynamic transmission power adjustment. The wireless transmission system 300 includes a radio frequency (RF) transmitter 302, a transmitting antenna 304, a detuning monitor 306, and a proximity detector 308. The detuning monitor 306 includes a coupler 310 (e.g., a directional coupler) and a circulator 315. In an example implementation, a directional coupler may be constructed from two coupled transmission lines between an RF transmitter interface 312 and an output of the coupler 310. The coupled transmission lines are routed close enough that transmission characteristics passing through one transmission line is coupled to the other transmission line, allowing the transmission characteristics passing through the RF transmitter interface 312 to be measured by the proximity detector 308.


In an example implementation, a circulator may be constructed from a passive non-reciprocal multi-port device in which a radio frequency signal entering a port of the circulator is transmitted to another port in rotation (e.g., port 1 to port 2, port 2 to port 3, port 3 to port 1). As shown in FIG. 3, the transmitted RF signal received from the coupler 310 is received at port 1 and passed through port 2 to the RF antenna 304. The reflected signal from the RF antenna 304 is received at port 2 and passed through port 3 to the proximity detector 308, providing a signal indicative of the output transmission characteristics of the VSWR measured by the proximity sensor 308. Proximity of a conductive body 301 may be indicated by changes in reflection of the transmitted signal via coupling with the conductive body 301 moving into proximity of the RF transmitting antenna 304. Alternatively, these changes may be referred to as being indicative of detuning of the RF transmitting antenna 304 by the proximity of the conductive body 301.


The proximity detector 308 detects the measured transmission characteristics at the input (e.g., RF transmitter interface 312) and at the output (e.g., the RF antenna interface 314 is represented by ports 2 and 3 of the circulator 315) to determine a measured input-output VSWR. If the measured VSWR satisfies the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to a baseline VSWR, then the proximity detector 308 signals the RF transmitter 302 to transmit at its standard power (or at some other power condition that is appropriate when an unacceptable proximity condition is not detected). If the measured VSWR does not satisfy the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to a baseline VSWR, then the proximity detector 308 signals the RF transmitter 302 to adjust its transmission power to a level set to satisfy the SAR constraints.



FIG. 4 illustrates an example network of antenna subsystems 402, 404, 406, and 408 in an electronic device 400, such as a tablet computing device, a laptop computing device, a set-top box, a wearable computing device, a smartphone, or any device with an RF subsystem. The antenna subsystems 402, 404, 406, and 408 are networked by communicative couplings 410, 412, 414, and 416. The electronic device 400 also includes a display interface 418 (e.g., a display screen), although other implementations may not include a display interface. The electronic device 400 illustrates a system having networked, proximity-detecting antenna subsystems 402, 404, 406, and 408 distributed at disparate locations in the electronic device 400, wherein the antenna subsystems 402, 404, 406, and 408 take advantage of the locational disparity within the electronic device 400 to improve device performance and/or compliance with SAR constraints. For example, if unacceptable proximity of a conductive body is detected by the antenna subsystem 404, the transmission power of the antenna subsystem 404 may be decreased to comply with SAR constraints while the transmission power of one or more of the antenna subsystems 402, 406, and 408 may be increased (assuming they comply with predefined acceptable VSWR conditions) to offset the decreased transmission power of the antenna subsystem 404. In an alternative implementation, which may be supplemented with one or more of the implementations described herein, the electronic device 400 may be configured to interpret concurrent failures of all four antenna subsystems 402, 404, 406, and 408 as a condition that does not require an adjustment of transmission power of any of the four antenna subsystems 402, 404, 406, and 408 (e.g., interpreting the conductive body to be a conductive surface, like a table top, rather than a human body part). More than four antenna subsystems may be so networked to coordinate SAR compliance and transmission power management.


Other conditions may also be employed. For example, transmission power adjustments may be based on a certain number of proximity-sensing antenna subsystems detecting an unacceptable proximity condition, the relative or absolute locations of proximity-sensing antenna subsystems detecting an unacceptable proximity condition, the transmission performance of individual proximity-sensing antenna subsystems (e.g., transmission power of an antenna subsystem detecting an unacceptable proximity condition may be reduced to zero if acceptable performance is being obtained via other antenna subsystems), etc.



FIG. 5 illustrates an example illustrates a Smith chart 500 showing a region 502 satisfying a predefined acceptable VSWR condition. The region 502 was determined by experimental means at a signal transmission frequency for a given transmission power. Similar charts may be generated at various frequencies to determine a region satisfying a predefined acceptable VSWR condition. The results of these expriement at useful frequencies may be programmed into a device such that the device could determine whether a dielectric body is too close to the antenna and in violation of a SAR requirement. Similar predefined acceptable VSWR conditions can be determined for different transmission powers. Such predefined acceptable VSWR conditions can be stored in registers, memory, or other circuitry accessible by a proximity detector to determine whether, under certain combinations of transmission frequency and transmission power, a particular antenna subsystem is operating in an acceptable proximity condition.


For example, if an antenna system is designed to transmit WiFi RF transmissions based on the IEEE 802.11 specification, a region of acceptable SAR could be determined for frequencies of in the range 2400 to 2500 MHz. Experiments may show that a VSWR above −12 dB occurs when a hand is within 3 cm of a device with an antenna transmitting at 2400 MHz. These experimental results may be stored in the device and used to determine when RF transmission power should be reduced based on a measure VSWR of −12 dB, −10 dB or higher.



FIG. 6 illustrates example operations 600 for a wireless transmission system with dynamic transmission power adjustment. An input operation 602 inputs an RF transmission carrier wave, such as through a detuning monitor to an RF antenna. A transmitting operation 604 transmits the RF transmission carrier wave. A detecting operation 606 detects a VSWR of the transmitted RF carrier wave between the input and output of a detuning monitor between the transmitter and the transmitting antenna.


A decision operation 608 determines whether the detected VSWR satisfies a predefined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to a baseline VSWR measurement. If so, processing proceeds to the inputting operation 602 for another iteration. If not, a conductive body is deemed within an unacceptable proximity to the transmitting antenna, and an adjustment operation 610 adjusts the transmission power of a transmitter transmitting the RF carrier wave and then proceeds to the inputting operation 602 for another iteration. In one implementation, the adjustment operation 610 adjusts the transmission power to satisfy SAR constraints, although this adjustment may occur in one iteration or over multiple iterations.



FIG. 7 illustrates alternative example operations 700 for a wireless transmission system with dynamic transmission power adjustment. An input operation 702 inputs an RF transmission carrier wave, such as through a detuning monitor to an RF antenna. A transmitting operation 704 transmits the RF transmission carrier wave. A detecting operation 706 detects a VSWR of the transmitted RF carrier wave between the input and output of a detuning monitor between the transmitter and the transmitting antenna.


A decision operation 708 determines whether the detected VSWR satisfies a predefined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to a baseline VSWR measurement. If so, processing proceeds to the inputting operation 702 for another iteration. If not, a conductive body is deemed within an unacceptable proximity to the transmitting antenna, and an adjustment operation 710 decreases the transmission power of a transmitter transmitting the RF carrier wave. A signaling operation 712 signals a networked proximity detector of another antenna to increase its transmission power to offset (in full or in part) the decrease in the power of the transmitter of the first antenna (e.g., if the proximity detector of the other antenna does not indicate an unacceptable proximity condition) and then processing proceeds to the inputting operation 702 for another iteration.


In one implementation, the adjustment operation 710 decreases the transmission power to satisfy SAR constraints, although this adjustment may occur in one iteration or over multiple iterations. Likewise, the increase in the transmission power of another antenna subsystem may occur in one iteration or over multiple iterations.


Individual operations illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 7 may be performed in sequence or concurrently. For example, the inputting and transmitting operations 602 and 604 may occur concurrently with the detecting, decision, and adjusting operations 606, 608, and 610, as various portions of the RF transmission carrier wave may be affected by these operations at any particular moment in time. Accordingly, the operations illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate logical operations performed by circuitry or a combination of circuitry, software, and mechanical structures


Accordingly, various implementations of an electrical device are disclosed, wherein the electrical device comprises means for detecting a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between a RF transmitter and an RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline and means for adjusting transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. For example, in one implementation, a detuning monitor detecting a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between a RF transmitter and an RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline, and a proximity monitor adjusts transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. In another implementation, a transmission power adjustment circuit or the RF transmitters themselves may adjust the transmission power, for example, responsive to a signal from one or more proximity detectors.


Among other implementations of the described technology, a method is disclosed including detecting a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between a radio frequency (RF) transmitter and an RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline and adjusting transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. The method may include a detecting operation that includes measuring VSWR between an input and an output of a detuning monitor coupled between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna. The method may include a detecting operation that includes measuring VSWR between an input and an output of a directional coupler connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna.


The method may employ a detuning monitor that includes a coupler connected to the RF transmitter and a circulator connected between the coupler and the RF antenna, wherein the detecting operation includes measuring VSWR between an input of a coupler and an output of the circulator. A first port of the circulator is connected to an output of the coupler, a second port of the circulator is connected to the RF antenna, and a third port of the circulator is connected to a proximity detector. The method may include an adjusting operation that determines whether the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition using the proximity detector.


The method may include detecting an unacceptable detuning of the RF antenna based on a change in the VSWR from a VSWR baseline that fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. The method may include communicatively connecting a proximity detector associated with the RF transmitter to another proximity detector associated with another RF transmitter and signaling the other RF transmitter to increase transmission power to another RF antenna.


The method may include communicatively connecting a proximity detector associated with the RF transmitter to another proximity detector associated with another RF transmitter and signaling the other RF transmitter to increase transmission power to another RF antenna, if a detected change in the VSWR associated with the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna satisfies an acceptable VSWR condition.


Among other implementations of the described technology, an electronic device is disclosed that includes a detuning monitor circuit configured to detect a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between a radio frequency (RF) transmitter and an RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline and a proximity detector circuit configured to adjust transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. The detuning monitor circuit may include a directional coupler connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna and to measure VSWR between an input and an output of the directional coupler.


The detuning monitor circuit may include a coupler configured for connection to the RF transmitter and to measure VSWR between an input of a coupler and an output of a circulator. A first port of the circulator may be connected to an output of the coupler, a second port of the circulator may be configured for connection to the RF antenna, and a third port of the circulator may be connected to the proximity detector circuit. The proximity detector circuit may be further configured to determine whether the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition.


The proximity detector circuit of the electronic device may be configured to detect an unacceptable detuning of the RF antenna based on a change in the VSWR from a VSWR baseline that fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. The proximity detector circuit of the electronic device may be connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna, and the electronic device may include another proximity detector circuit communicatively connected to the proximity detector circuit. The other proximity detector circuit is connected to another RF transmitter, and the proximity detector circuit is configured to signal the other RF transmitter to increase transmission power to another RF antenna.


The proximity detector circuit of the electronic device may be connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna and the electronic device may include another proximity detector circuit communicatively connected to the proximity detector circuit. The other proximity detector circuit is connected to another RF transmitter. The proximity detector circuit is configured to signal the other RF transmitter connected to increase transmission power to another RF antenna, if a detected change in the VSWR associated with the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna satisfies an acceptable VSWR condition.


Among other implementations of the described technology, a transmission system is disclosed that includes an antenna and a detuning monitor circuit coupled to the antenna. The detuning monitor may include a first coupler port and a second coupler port in communication with the antenna. The detuning monitor may also include a first sense port, and a second sense port. The transmission system may also include a power amplifier including a gain control input and a signal output in communication with the first coupler port. The transmission system may also include a proximity detector circuit including a first input in communication with the first sense port, a second input in communication with the second sense port, and an output in communication with the gain control input. The proximity detector circuit of the transmission system may be configured to determine a VSWR value based on a first signal detected at the first input and a second signal detected at the second input. The proximity detector circuit of the transmission system may be also or alternatively be configured to communicate a gain control signal to the gain control input, wherein the gain control signal is based on the VSWR value.


Among other implementations of the described technology, an electronic device is disclosed including a radio frequency (RF) transmitter, an RF antenna, a detuning monitor circuit configured to detect a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline, and a proximity detector circuit configured to adjust transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. The proximity detector circuit may be connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna and the electronic device may include another RF transmitter, another RF antenna, and another proximity detector circuit communicatively connected to the proximity detector circuit. The other proximity detector circuit may be connected between the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna. The proximity detector circuit may be configured to signal the other RF transmitter via the other proximity detector to increase transmission power to another RF antenna.


The proximity detector circuit of the electronic device may be connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna. The electronic device may include another RF transmitter, another RF antenna, and another proximity detector circuit communicatively connected to the proximity detector circuit. The other proximity detector circuit may be connected between the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna. The proximity detector circuit may be configured to signal the other RF transmitter via the other proximity detector circuit to increase transmission power to another RF antenna, if a detected change in the VSWR associated with the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna satisfies an acceptable VSWR condition.


The implementations of the invention described herein are implemented as logical steps in one or more computer systems. The logical operations of the presently described technology may be implemented (1) as a sequence of processor-implemented steps executing in one or more computer systems and (2) as interconnected machine or circuit modules within one or more computer systems. The implementation is a matter of choice, dependent on the performance requirements of the computer system implementing the invention. Accordingly, the logical operations making up the embodiments of the invention described herein are referred to variously as operations, steps, objects, or modules. Furthermore, it should be understood that logical operations may be performed in any order, adding and omitting as desired, unless explicitly claimed otherwise or a specific order is inherently necessitated by the claim language.


The above specification, examples, and data provide a complete description of the structure and use of exemplary embodiments of the invention. Since many implementations of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended. Furthermore, structural features of the different embodiments may be combined in yet another implementation without departing from the recited claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: detecting a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between a radio frequency (RF) transmitter and an RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline; andidentifying an applicable VSWR condition of a plurality of predefined VSWR conditions corresponding to various signal transmission frequencies, each of the predefined VSWR conditions indicative of a VSWR observable at a corresponding one of the various signal transmission frequencies when a conductive body is not within a threshold proximity of the RF antenna; andadjusting transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy the applicable VSWR condition.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the detecting operation comprises: measuring VSWR between an input and an output of a detuning monitor coupled between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the detecting operation comprises: measuring VSWR between an input and an output of a directional coupler connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna, the directional coupler including first and second transmission lines routed in proximity such that transmission characteristics passing through the first transmission line are measurable along the second transmission line.
  • 4. The method of claim 2 wherein the detuning monitor includes a coupler connected to the RF transmitter and further includes a circulator connected between the coupler and the RF antenna, and the detecting operation comprises: measuring VSWR between an input of the coupler and an output of the circulator.
  • 5. The method of claim 4 wherein a first port of the circulator is connected to an output of the coupler, a second port of the circulator is connected to the RF antenna, and a third port of the circulator is connected to a proximity detector.
  • 6. The method of claim 5 wherein the adjusting operation further comprises: determining whether the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition using the proximity detector.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the detecting operation comprises: detecting an unacceptable detuning of the RF antenna based on a change in the VSWR from a VSWR baseline that fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 further comprising: communicatively connecting a proximity detector associated with the RF transmitter to another proximity detector associated with another RF transmitter; andsignaling the other RF transmitter to increase transmission power to another RF antenna.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 further comprising: communicatively connecting a proximity detector associated with the RF transmitter to another proximity detector associated with another RF transmitter; andsignaling the other RF transmitter to increase transmission power to another RF antenna, if a detected change in the VSWR associated with the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna satisfies an acceptable VSWR condition.
  • 10. An electronic device comprising: a detuning monitor circuit configured to detect a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between a radio frequency (RF) transmitter and an RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline; anda proximity detector circuit configured to identify an applicable VSWR condition of a plurality of predefined VSWR conditions corresponding to various signal transmission frequencies each indicative of a VSWR observable at a corresponding one of the various signal transmission frequencies when a conductive body is not within a threshold proximity of the RF antenna, wherein the proximity detector circuit is further configured to adjust transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy the applicable VSWR condition.
  • 11. The electronic device of claim 10 wherein the detuning monitor circuit includes a directional coupler connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna and is further configured to measure VSWR between an input and an output of the directional coupler, the directional coupler including first and second transmission lines routed in proximity such that transmission characteristics passing through the first transmission line are measurable along the second transmission line.
  • 12. The electronic device of claim 10 wherein the detuning monitor circuit includes a coupler configured for connection to the RF transmitter and is further configured to measure VSWR between an input of the coupler and an output of a circulator.
  • 13. The electronic device of claim 12 wherein a first port of the circulator is connected to an output of the coupler, a second port of the circulator is configured for connection to the RF antenna, and a third port of the circulator is connected to the proximity detector circuit.
  • 14. The electronic device of claim 13 wherein proximity detector circuit is further configured to determine whether the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition.
  • 15. The electronic device of claim 10 wherein proximity detector circuit is further configured to detect an unacceptable detuning of the RF antenna based on a change in the VSWR from a VSWR baseline that fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition.
  • 16. The electronic device of claim 10 wherein the proximity detector circuit is connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna and further comprising: another proximity detector circuit communicatively connected to the proximity detector circuit, the other proximity detector circuit being connected to another RF transmitter, the proximity detector circuit being configured to signal the other RF transmitter to increase transmission power to another RF antenna.
  • 17. The electronic device of claim 10 wherein the proximity detector circuit is connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna and further comprising: another proximity detector circuit communicatively connected to the proximity detector circuit, the other proximity detector circuit being connected to another RF transmitter, the proximity detector circuit being configured to signal the other RF transmitter connected to increase transmission power to another RF antenna, if a detected change in the VSWR associated with the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna satisfies an acceptable VSWR condition.
  • 18. An electronic device comprising: a radio frequency (RF) transmitter;an RF antenna;a detuning monitor circuit configured to detect a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline; anda proximity detector circuit configured to identify an applicable VSWR condition of a plurality of predefined VSWR conditions corresponding to various signal transmission frequencies each indicative of a VSWR observable at a corresponding one of the various signal transmission frequencies when a conductive body is not within a threshold proximity of the RF antenna, and wherein the proximity detector circuit is further configured to adjust transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy the applicable VSWR condition.
  • 19. The electronic device of claim 18 wherein the proximity detector circuit is connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna and further comprising: another RF transmitter;another RF antenna;another proximity detector circuit communicatively connected to the proximity detector circuit, the other proximity detector circuit being connected between the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna, the proximity detector circuit being configured to signal the other RF transmitter via the other proximity detector to increase transmission power to another RF antenna.
  • 20. The electronic device of claim 18 wherein the proximity detector circuit is connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna and further comprising: another RF transmitter;another RF antenna;another proximity detector circuit communicatively connected to the proximity detector circuit, the other proximity detector circuit being connected between the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna, the proximity detector circuit being configured to signal the other RF transmitter via the other proximity detector to increase transmission power to another RF antenna, if a detected change in the VSWR associated with the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna satisfies an acceptable VSWR condition.
US Referenced Citations (199)
Number Name Date Kind
4016490 Weckenmann et al. Apr 1977 A
4729129 Koerner Mar 1988 A
4806944 Jacomb-Hood Feb 1989 A
5166679 Vranish et al. Nov 1992 A
5212621 Panter May 1993 A
5408690 Ishikawa Apr 1995 A
5564086 Cygan Oct 1996 A
6178310 Jeong Jan 2001 B1
6657595 Phillips Dec 2003 B1
6989745 Milinusic et al. Jan 2006 B1
7009944 Hulbert Mar 2006 B1
7053629 Nevermann May 2006 B2
7062288 Raaf et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071776 Forrester et al. Jul 2006 B2
7124193 Leung et al. Oct 2006 B1
7146139 Nevermann Dec 2006 B2
7151382 Kean Dec 2006 B1
7162264 Vance Jan 2007 B2
7167093 Fergusson Jan 2007 B2
7541874 Maeda Jun 2009 B2
7729715 Love et al. Jun 2010 B2
7917175 Song Mar 2011 B2
8063375 Cobbinah et al. Nov 2011 B2
8134461 Van Dorrn Mar 2012 B2
8208423 Liu et al. Jun 2012 B2
8213982 Marlett et al. Jul 2012 B2
8269511 Jordan Sep 2012 B2
8324549 Romero et al. Dec 2012 B2
8326385 Brogle Dec 2012 B2
8401851 Bushey Mar 2013 B2
8417296 Caballero et al. Apr 2013 B2
8432322 Amm et al. Apr 2013 B2
8442572 Borran et al. May 2013 B2
8466839 Schlub et al. Jun 2013 B2
8483632 Asrani et al. Jul 2013 B2
8515496 Cheng et al. Aug 2013 B2
8547952 Liu et al. Oct 2013 B2
8548388 Chiu et al. Oct 2013 B2
8559999 Hu et al. Oct 2013 B2
8565205 Ho et al. Oct 2013 B2
8577289 Schlub et al. Nov 2013 B2
8723531 Harrison May 2014 B2
8723749 Lin et al. May 2014 B2
8775103 Jayaraj et al. Jul 2014 B1
8781437 Ngai et al. Jul 2014 B2
8792930 Gopalakrishnan et al. Jul 2014 B1
8798695 Zheng et al. Aug 2014 B1
8860526 Manssen Oct 2014 B2
8922443 Zhu et al. Dec 2014 B2
8975903 Salter et al. Mar 2015 B2
9325355 Pecen Apr 2016 B2
9337833 Siska May 2016 B2
9466872 Sanchez et al. Oct 2016 B2
20020009976 Rashidi Jan 2002 A1
20020039028 Douglas et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020175814 Wadlow et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030064732 McDowell et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030064761 Nevermann Apr 2003 A1
20030210203 Phillips et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030214310 McIntosh Nov 2003 A1
20030228846 Berliner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040021608 Kojima et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040075613 Jarmuszewski et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040108957 Umehara et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040113847 Qi et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040160378 Abrams et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040222925 Fabrega-Sanchez et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050017906 Man et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050093624 Qllikainen et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050184914 Ollikainen et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060244663 Fleck et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070111681 Alberth, Jr. et al. May 2007 A1
20070120745 Qi et al. May 2007 A1
20070122307 Da Costa et al. May 2007 A1
20080051165 Burgan et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080055160 Kim et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080158065 Wee Jul 2008 A1
20080218493 Patten et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080254836 Qi et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090047998 Alberth, Jr. Feb 2009 A1
20090230884 Van Doorn Sep 2009 A1
20090253459 Naganuma et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090295648 Dorsey et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090305742 Caballero Dec 2009 A1
20090325511 Kim Dec 2009 A1
20100026664 Geaghan Feb 2010 A1
20100052997 Kan et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100056210 Bychkov et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100067419 Liu et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100113111 Wong et al. May 2010 A1
20100234058 Hu et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100234081 Wong et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100279751 Pourseyed et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100283691 Su et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100317302 Greenwood et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100321325 Springer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110001675 Lee Jan 2011 A1
20110012793 Amm et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110012794 Schlub et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110043408 Shi et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110063042 Mendolia Mar 2011 A1
20110117973 Asrani et al. May 2011 A1
20110124363 Calvarese et al. May 2011 A1
20110157077 Martin et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110199267 Hayashi Aug 2011 A1
20110222469 Ali et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110250928 Schlub et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110298669 Rao Dec 2011 A1
20120021707 Forrester et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120021800 Wilson et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120023225 Imes et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120044115 McCaughey et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120071195 Chakraborty et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120074961 Herrmann Mar 2012 A1
20120133561 Konanur et al. May 2012 A1
20120147801 Ho et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120164962 Lin et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120172079 Baldemair et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120178494 Haim et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120190398 Leukkunen Jul 2012 A1
20120214422 Shi et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120223865 Lie et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120231784 Kazmi Sep 2012 A1
20120270519 Ngai et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120270592 Ngai et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120295554 Greene Nov 2012 A1
20120298497 Maeda et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120299772 Shtrom et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120315847 Li et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120329517 Elin Dec 2012 A1
20120329524 Kent et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130005413 Brogle et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130016621 Kil et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130026846 Gianesello et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130033400 Chiang Feb 2013 A1
20130045700 Stallman et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130050046 Jarvis et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130051261 Kazmi et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130120257 Park et al. May 2013 A1
20130122827 Ali et al. May 2013 A1
20130127677 Lin et al. May 2013 A1
20130137487 Sato May 2013 A1
20130149957 Desclos et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130157564 Shi Jun 2013 A1
20130169348 Shi Jul 2013 A1
20130178167 Lockerbie et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130178174 Geris et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130203363 Gratt et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130210477 Peter Aug 2013 A1
20130217342 Abdul-Gaffoor et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130241670 Mikhemar Sep 2013 A1
20130278474 Lenormand et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130293244 Leek Nov 2013 A1
20130300618 Yarga et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130310105 Sagae et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130310106 Wang et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130314365 Woolley et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130335291 Judson Dec 2013 A1
20140015595 VanAusdall et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140021801 Kao et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140066124 Novet Mar 2014 A1
20140071008 Desclos et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140078094 Yang Mar 2014 A1
20140087663 Burchill et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140098491 Wang Apr 2014 A1
20140098693 Tabet et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140128032 Muthukumar May 2014 A1
20140139380 Ouyang et al. May 2014 A1
20140141733 Wong et al. May 2014 A1
20140152121 Ku Jun 2014 A1
20140155000 Erkens Jun 2014 A1
20140159980 Finegold Jun 2014 A1
20140173269 Varoglu et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140176938 Yang et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140206297 Schlub et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140274188 Thorson Sep 2014 A1
20140274189 Moller et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140280450 Luna Sep 2014 A1
20140292587 Yarga et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140307570 Hong Oct 2014 A1
20140315592 Schlub et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140357207 Ma Dec 2014 A1
20140357313 Mercer et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140370929 Khawand et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150031408 Kalla et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150053575 Bridges et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150141080 Standing May 2015 A1
20150169093 Nakao Jun 2015 A1
20150177371 Abbasi et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150199042 Standing et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150200444 Mercer et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150201385 Mercer et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150201387 Khawand et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150288074 Harper et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160049978 Mercer et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160064801 Han et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160098053 Khawand et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160164563 Khawand et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160204836 Lee et al. Jul 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (51)
Number Date Country
1179864 Apr 1998 CN
102064812 May 2011 CN
202276339 Jun 2012 CN
102714346 Oct 2012 CN
103248747 Aug 2013 CN
843421 May 1998 EP
1298809 Apr 2003 EP
1469550 Dec 2004 EP
100504407 Oct 2006 EP
1732167 Dec 2006 EP
2015548 Feb 2010 EP
2276108 Jan 2011 EP
2381527 Oct 2011 EP
2383364 Nov 2011 EP
2405534 Jan 2012 EP
2410661 Jan 2012 EP
2509229 Oct 2012 EP
2509229 Oct 2012 EP
2568605 Mar 2013 EP
2787780 Oct 2014 EP
2293277 Mar 1996 GB
2380359 Apr 2003 GB
2409345 Jun 2005 GB
2002043957 Feb 2002 JP
2007194995 Aug 2007 JP
0042797 Jul 2000 WO
0148858 Jul 2001 WO
2004015813 Feb 2004 WO
2004091046 Oct 2004 WO
2005018046 Feb 2005 WO
2007043150 Apr 2007 WO
2009149023 Dec 2009 WO
2011051554 May 2011 WO
2011058128 May 2011 WO
2012152103 Feb 2012 WO
2012061582 May 2012 WO
2012091651 Jul 2012 WO
2012113754 Aug 2012 WO
2012122113 Sep 2012 WO
2012122116 Sep 2012 WO
2012143936 Oct 2012 WO
2012176217 Dec 2012 WO
2013011352 Jan 2013 WO
2013101106 Jul 2013 WO
2013103948 Jul 2013 WO
2013141791 Sep 2013 WO
2013165419 Nov 2013 WO
2013169527 Nov 2013 WO
2014036532 Mar 2014 WO
2015134117 Sep 2015 WO
2016111897 Jul 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (90)
Entry
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Updated Search Report for PCT/US2014/072412, mailed Oct. 5, 2015, 3 pages.
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Updated Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/072412, mailed Oct. 5, 2015, 8 pages.
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/072413, dated Jul. 16, 2015, 16 pages.
“SAR Evaluation Considerations for Laptop, Notebook, Netbook and Tablet Computers,” Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division, May 28, 2013, 14 pages.
Hochwald, et al “Minimizing Exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation in Portable Devices”, In Proceedings of Information Theory and Applications Workshop, Feb. 5, 2012, pp. 107.
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/US2014/039479, dated Jun. 15, 2015, 8 pages.
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion of IPEA for PCT/US2014/065856, mailed Oct. 13, 2015, 6 pages.
Myllymaki, Sami “Capacitive Antenna Sensor for Proximity Recognition”; http://herkules.oulu/fi/isbn9789514299155/isbn9789514299155.pdf, dated Nov. 30, 2012, 60 pages.
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/065856, dated Feb. 4, 2015, 10 pages.
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/037593, dated Aug. 20, 2015; mailed Aug. 31, 2015, 13 pages.
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report for PCT/US2015/037563 dated Aug. 20, 2015, 5 pages.
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/037563, mailed Aug. 31, 2015, 6 pages.
“Digital, Silicon Microphone has 2.6×1.6mm2 Footprint”, Published on: Dec. 12, 2005, Available at: http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/Digital-Silicon-Microphone-has-2-6-x-1-6-mm-footprint-471386.
Khawand, et al., “Radiating Structure with Integrated Proximity Sensing” formerly titled as “SAR Sensor Execution where Part of One or More Antennas is on the Exterior Surface of a Mobile Device”, unfiled US Patent Application (filed herewith).
Holopainen, et al., “Broadband Equivalent Circuit Model for Capacitive Coupling Element-Based Mobile Terminal Antenna”, In IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 9, Jul. 8, 2010, 4 pages.
Ozyalcin, et al., “SAR Simulations in Wireless Communication and Safety Discussions in the Society”, In Proceedings of Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, vol. 10, Issue 2, Dec. 31, 2013, 16 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, Pai, et al., “Radio Frequency (RF) Power Back-Off Optimization for Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Compliance”, filed Jun. 14, 2013.
“Low SAR Solution for Tablet PC”, Published on: Sep. 27, 2011, Available at: http://www.auden.com.tw/TRC/webspace/disk/AudenSARSolutiondatasheet—110927.pdf.
“Semtech Launches Smart Proximity Sensor for Short-Range Human Presence Detection & SAR Regulations in Mobile & Tablet PC Applications”, Published on: Jul. 24, 2012, Available at: http://www.semtech.com/Press-Releases/2012/Semtech-Launches-Smart-Proximity-Sensor-for-Short-Range-Human-Presence-Detection-SAR-Regulations-in-Mobile-Tablet-PC-Applications.html.
Toit, Riaan Du, “Using Proximity Sensing to Meet Mobile Device FCC SAR Reulations”, Published on: Apr. 17, 2012, Available at: http://www.eetimes.com/General/PrintView/431201.
Khawand, et al., “Radio Frequency (RF) Power Back-Off Optimization for Specific Abdorption Rate (SAR) Compliance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, filed Jun. 14, 2013, 40 pages.
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/042023, Aug. 29, 2014, 11 Pages.
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/039479, Sep. 19, 2014, 11 Pages.
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/072411, Mar. 27, 2015, 10 Pages.
International Searching Authority, Unitd States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/072412, Mar. 30, 2015, 11 Pages.
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/072414, Apr. 14, 2015, 9 Pages.
Mrazovac, “Reaching the Next Level of Indoor Human Presence Detection: An RF Based Solution”, 11th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services, Oct. 16, 2013, 4 pages.
I.B. Bonev et al, “Parmetric Study of Antenna with Parasitic Element for Improving the Hearing Aids Compatibility of Mobile Phones and the Specific Absorption Rate in the Head”, Proceedings in Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Marrakesh, Morocco, Mar. 20-23, 2011, 5 pages.
J. Poutanen, “Interaction Between Mobile Terminal Antenna and User” Helsinki University of Technology Master's Thesis, Oct. 9, 2007, 100 pages.
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2014/042023, Mar. 2, 2015, 6 Pages.
Sterner, et al., “Development of an Antenna Sensor for Occupant Detection in Passenger Transportation”, In Proceedings of Procedia Engineering, vol. 47, Sep. 9, 2012, 6 pages.
Poutanent, et al., “Behavior of Mobile Terminal Antennas near Human Tissue at a Wide Frequency Range”, In International Workshop on Antenna Technology: Small Antennas and Novel Metamaterials, Mar. 4, 2008, 4 pages.
Curto, et al., “Circular Loop Antenna Operating at 434 MHz for Medical Applications: Loop-Tissue Interaction”, In Proceeding of: Irish Signals and Systems Conference, Jul. 2006, 6 pages.
Rogerson, James, “Samsung reveals a folding phone-to-tablet prototype”, http://www.techradar.com/us/news/phone-and-communications/mobile..nes/samsung-reveals-a-folding-phone-to-tablet-prototype-1197384,7 pages.
Mercer, et al., “Dynamic Antenna Power Control for Multi-Context Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,964, filed Jan. 5, 2016, 52 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,351, Feb. 20, 2015, 10 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,088, Mar. 23, 2015, 37 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,652, Jul. 16, 2015, 9 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,086, Jul. 22, 2015, 13 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,529, Sep. 22, 2015, 18 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, Sep. 23, 2015, 16 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,086, Nov. 30, 2015, 19 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/562,212, Dec. 18, 2015, 16 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/927,287, Dec. 21, 2015, 28 pages.
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,652, Dec. 23, 2016, 9 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,529, Jan. 22, 2016, 18 pages.
Office Action Issued in United Kingdom Patent Application No. 1219096.3, Mailed Date: Jan. 28, 2016, 4 Pages.
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, Mar. 2, 2016, 20 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,652, Apr. 18, 2016 9 pages.
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/927,287”, Mailed Date: May 11, 2016, 34 Pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,866, Mailed Date: May 19, 2016, 7 pages.
Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201380055749.X, Mailed Date: Jun. 6, 2016, 12 Pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, Jun. 14, 2016, 21 pages.
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/562,212, Jun. 17, 2016, 17 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/506,478, Jul. 1, 2016, 10 pages.
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/066441, Mailed Date: Dec. 12, 2013, 12 Pages.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/US2013/066441, dated May 7, 2015, 9 pages.
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Second International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/072412; mailing date: Oct. 5, 2015, 11 pages.
Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/072411, Mailed Date: Nov. 26, 2015, 7 Pages.
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion of International Preliminary Examining Authority for PCT/US2014/072412, mailed Dec. 4, 2015, 5 pages.
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority for PCT/US2014/072414 mailed Dec. 9, 2015, 29 pages.
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority for PCT/US2014/072413 mailed Dec. 17, 2015, 6 pages.
International Seraching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/062851, mailed Feb. 5, 2016, 11 pages.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/065856, date mailed: Feb. 10, 2016, 14 pages.
International Preliminary Report of Patentability issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/072412; mailed date: Mar. 22, 2016, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/072411; date mailed Mar. 23, 2016, 8 pages.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/072414; date mailed Mar. 23, 2016, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/072413, date mailed Mar. 24, 2016, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, Second Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority for PCT/2015/037563, mailed Jun. 1, 2016, 5 pages.
Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/052769, Mailed Date: Jul. 7, 2016, 5 Pages.
Office Action Issued in Columbian Patent Application No. NC2016/0000122, Mailed Date: Aug. 19, 2016, 2 Pages.
Ban, et al., “A Dual-Loop Antenna Design for Hepta-Band WWAN/LTE Metal-Rimmed Smartphone Applications”, In Journal of IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, Issue 1, Jan. 2015, 8 pages.
Chung, et al., “A dual-mode antenna for wireless charging and Near Field Communication”, In Proceedings of EEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Jul. 24, 2015, 5 pages.
Design of Printed Trace Differential Loop Antennas, http://www.silabs.com/Support%20Documents/TechnicalDocs/AN639.pdf, Retrieved on: Nov. 17, 2016, 28 pages.
Mumcu, et al., “Small Wideband Double-Loop Antennas Using Lumped Inductors and Coupling Capacitors”, In Journal of IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 10, Feb. 4, 2011, 5 pages.
Osoinach, Bryce, “Proximity Capacitive Sensor Technology for Touch Sensing Applications”, In White Paper of Proximity Sensing, 2007, 7 pages.
Pal, et al., “A low-profile switched-beam dual-band capacitively coupled Square Loop Antenna”, In Proceedings of Antennas and Propagation Conference, Nov. 11, 2013, 5 Pages.
Pal, et al., “Dual-Band Low-Profile Capacitively Coupled Beam-Steerable Square-Loop Antenna”, In Journal of IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 62, Issue 3, Mar. 2014, pp. 1204-1211.
Quddious, et al., “An inkjet printed meandered dipole antenna for RF passive sensing applications”, In Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Apr. 2016, 4 Pages.
Standing, et al., “Radiofrequency-Wave-Transparent Capacitive Sensor Pad”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/384,742, filed Dec. 20, 2016, 26 pages.
Harper et al., “Active Proximity Sensor With Adaptive Electric Field Control”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/413,196, filed Jan. 23, 2016, 35 pages.
Harper, “Loop Antenna With Integrated Proximity Sensing”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/412,997, filed Jan. 23, 2016, 32 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,866, Mailed Date: Oct. 17, 2016, 7 pages.
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, Oct. 26, 2016, 25 pages.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,964, Mailed Date: Nov. 30, 2016, 8 pages.
First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480031132.9, Mailed Date: Nov. 2, 2016, 10 Pages.
First Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480033869.4, Mailed Date: Dec. 19, 2016, 6 Pages.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2015/037563, mailed Sep. 13, 2016, 11 pages.
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2015/052769, mailed Sep. 29, 2016, 16 pages.
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/062851”, Mailed Date: Oct. 28, 2016, 8 Pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150382307 A1 Dec 2015 US