Consumer electronic devices may be equipped with wireless communication circuitry that makes use of radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. For example, the wireless communications circuitry may transmit and receive RF signals in mobile telephone RF bands, WiFi network RF bands, GPS RF bands, near-field communication (NFC) bands, and other RF bands that may be associated with a telecommunications specification. To protect humans from harmful levels of RF radiation when using such devices, government agencies have imposed regulations limiting RF transmission power from some wireless electronic devices, such as tablet computers and mobile phones. Reducing RF transmission power may utilize valuable resources in mobile devices and decrease performance of device features in some electronic devices.
In some jurisdictions, specific absorption rate (SAR) specifications are in place imposing maximum energy absorption constraints on electronic device manufacturers. These specifications articulate restrictions on the amount of electromagnetic radiation that may be emitted based on proximity of a transmitting radio frequency (RF) antenna. Particular attention is given to radiation limits at distances within a few centimeters from the device (e.g., 0-3 centimeters), where users are likely to place a human body part near the transmitting antenna. Such restrictions may be satisfied by reducing transmitted carrier signal strength when a dielectric body (e.g., a human body part) is detected in the proximity of the transmitter.
Implementations of the disclosed technology provide an electronic device that dynamically alters the power of a transmitted carrier wave responsive to detected changes in the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between an antenna and a transmitter connected to the antenna. A user in proximity of the antenna influences the tuning of the antenna in a detectable manner, allowing for the dynamic power alteration that achieves compliance with SAR specifications without significantly compromising performance of the electronic device.
In the example of
Between each transmitter-antenna pair is a detuning monitor, such as detuning monitor circuits 118, 120, 122, and 124, used to monitor the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between the input and output of the detuning monitor, referred to as the input-output VSWR. Generally, the VSWR represents the voltage ratio between a maximum standing wave amplitude at one node to the minimum standing wave amplitude at another node. As such, the detuning monitor circuit 118 detects changes in the VSWR between an input node (e.g., from an input node coupled to the transmitter 112) and an output node (e.g., an output node coupled to the antenna 106).
When compared to a baseline input-output VSWR (e.g., measured under conditions in which a conductive body is not within effective proximity of the transmitting antenna or some other appropriate baseline), a difference between the baseline VSWR and continuously or periodically measured VSWR values can be tested by a proximity detector (such as proximity detector circuits 126, 128, 130, or 132) to determine whether the difference fails to satisfy a predetermined acceptable VSWR condition. Using an example antenna subsystem 133 including the detuning monitor circuit 120, the antenna 102, the proximity detector circuit 128, and the RF transmitter 104, failure to satisfy the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to the baseline VSWR, indicates an unacceptable proximity 134 of the conductive body 110 to the antenna 102. When the proximity detector circuit 128 detects this state, the proximity detector circuit 128 adjusts the transmission power from the corresponding transmitter 104 to satisfy SAR constraints (e.g., reducing the transmission power while the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition is not satisfied). Similar operations and coupling structures may be applied to the other antenna subsystems 131, 135, and 137 shown in
In this manner, proximity detector circuit 128 closes a feedback loop. The proximity detector circuit 128 may be controlled by a control unit, such as a processor or controller programmed with firmware or software, or state machine implemented with digital memory and logic (not shown). The control unit may provide control signals to the proximity detector circuit 128 to communicate when the proximity detector circuit 128 shall take a proximity measurement and by how much the transmission power shall be decreased in response to a non-compliant SAR condition. The time delay between successive measurements and power reductions may be dynamically selected to account for quickly changing conditions, e.g., a rapidly approaching hand or a static situation, for example, in which a device is set on a table without any persons in proximity. As an alternative to separate control unit, the control functionality may be integrated in proximity circuit 128.
Proximity detector circuit 128 may be constructed from analog or digital circuits, or a combination of both digital and analog circuits. Proximity detector circuit 128 may include one or more analog-to-digital converters to convert the standing wave voltage signals to digital data, which is then compared, for example, by measuring VSWR, to determine proximity. A look-up table may provide the association between VSWR and physical proximity. Alternative, a formula relating VSWR to proximity may be programmed into the control unit or proximity detector circuit 128. Additionally processing of the measured VSWR may be performed, such as, for example, filtering or integrating measurements over time.
Antenna subsystems 131 and 137 are coupled (see coupling 140) to allow the proximity detectors 126 and 132 to communicate proximity parameters (e.g., a VSWR stream, status relative to the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition, etc.). As such, the antenna subsystems can 131 and 137 can work in concert to satisfy SAR constraints and/or improve antenna performance in the presence of an unacceptable proximity condition. For example, if the antenna subsystem 131 detects an unacceptable proximity condition but the antenna subsystems 137 detects an acceptable proximity condition (i.e., the predetermined acceptable proximity condition is satisfied), the subsystems 131 and 137 can communicate across the coupling 140 to coordinate a decrease in transmission power at the transmitter 112 and an increase at the transmitter 116. In this manner, the reduction in transmission power at transmitter 112, due to SAR constraints, may be offset to some extent by an increase in transmission power at the transmitter 116, thereby balancing transmission power based on proximity detection among multiple transmitters. Such a network of antenna subsystems may be expanded to more than two subsystems (e.g., to antenna subsystems at all four corners of a tablet computer system). The antenna subsystem 133 and 135 can cooperate in a similar fashion via the coupling 142. In an implementation antenna subsystems for different frequency ranges may also be coordinated to obtain a wider range and/or finer resolution of proximity detection (e.g., if all four antenna subsystems 131, 133, 135, and 137 are networked to cooperate, proximity may be detected across the entire length of the top of the electronic device 100.
The predetermined acceptable proximity condition for the amplified antenna subsystem (e.g., antenna subsystem 137) may be adjusted according to transmission power. As such, if the transmission power of the transmitter 116 is increased, the predetermined acceptable proximity condition may be adjusted to satisfy SAR constraints in the presences of increased transmission power. Such adjustments may, for example, be predetermined and stored in a data table accessible to the proximity detector circuit 124 (e.g., having different predetermined acceptable proximity conditions for different transmission powers).
Furthermore, antenna subsystem coordination may be used to identify false positives (e.g., circumstances in which the proximity condition is not subject to SAR constraints, such as when the computing device is laid flat on a metal table). For example, SAR testing conditions may address a single antenna subsystem one-at-a-time, where coordinating antenna subsystems may determine that a failure of four coordinated antenna subsystems (e.g., across the top edge of the electronic device 100 or at four corners of the electronic device 100) implies the proximity of a metal surface as opposed to hands or a head of a human. Under such conditions, the proximity detectors may determine that the proximity detection is a false positive, relative to human safety and SAR constraints, and therefore determine that a reduction in transmission power is not appropriate. Other similar conditions may be applied depending on SAR conditions tested, antenna subsystem locations, and the configuration and structure of the electronic device 100.
The proximity detector 208 detects the measured transmission characteristics at the input (e.g., RF transmitter interface 212) and at the output (e.g., RF antenna interface 214) to determine a measured VSWR. If the measured VSWR satisfies the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to a baseline VSWR, then the proximity detector 208 signals the RF transmitter 202 to transmit at its standard power (or at some other power condition that is appropriate when an unacceptable proximity condition is not detected). If the measured VSWR does not satisfy the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to a baseline VSWR, then the proximity detector 208 signals the RF transmitter 202 to adjust its transmission power to a level set to satisfy the SAR constraints.
In an example implementation, a circulator may be constructed from a passive non-reciprocal multi-port device in which a radio frequency signal entering a port of the circulator is transmitted to another port in rotation (e.g., port 1 to port 2, port 2 to port 3, port 3 to port 1). As shown in
The proximity detector 308 detects the measured transmission characteristics at the input (e.g., RF transmitter interface 312) and at the output (e.g., the RF antenna interface 314 is represented by ports 2 and 3 of the circulator 315) to determine a measured input-output VSWR. If the measured VSWR satisfies the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to a baseline VSWR, then the proximity detector 308 signals the RF transmitter 302 to transmit at its standard power (or at some other power condition that is appropriate when an unacceptable proximity condition is not detected). If the measured VSWR does not satisfy the predetermined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to a baseline VSWR, then the proximity detector 308 signals the RF transmitter 302 to adjust its transmission power to a level set to satisfy the SAR constraints.
Other conditions may also be employed. For example, transmission power adjustments may be based on a certain number of proximity-sensing antenna subsystems detecting an unacceptable proximity condition, the relative or absolute locations of proximity-sensing antenna subsystems detecting an unacceptable proximity condition, the transmission performance of individual proximity-sensing antenna subsystems (e.g., transmission power of an antenna subsystem detecting an unacceptable proximity condition may be reduced to zero if acceptable performance is being obtained via other antenna subsystems), etc.
For example, if an antenna system is designed to transmit WiFi RF transmissions based on the IEEE 802.11 specification, a region of acceptable SAR could be determined for frequencies of in the range 2400 to 2500 MHz. Experiments may show that a VSWR above −12 dB occurs when a hand is within 3 cm of a device with an antenna transmitting at 2400 MHz. These experimental results may be stored in the device and used to determine when RF transmission power should be reduced based on a measure VSWR of −12 dB, −10 dB or higher.
A decision operation 608 determines whether the detected VSWR satisfies a predefined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to a baseline VSWR measurement. If so, processing proceeds to the inputting operation 602 for another iteration. If not, a conductive body is deemed within an unacceptable proximity to the transmitting antenna, and an adjustment operation 610 adjusts the transmission power of a transmitter transmitting the RF carrier wave and then proceeds to the inputting operation 602 for another iteration. In one implementation, the adjustment operation 610 adjusts the transmission power to satisfy SAR constraints, although this adjustment may occur in one iteration or over multiple iterations.
A decision operation 708 determines whether the detected VSWR satisfies a predefined acceptable VSWR condition, relative to a baseline VSWR measurement. If so, processing proceeds to the inputting operation 702 for another iteration. If not, a conductive body is deemed within an unacceptable proximity to the transmitting antenna, and an adjustment operation 710 decreases the transmission power of a transmitter transmitting the RF carrier wave. A signaling operation 712 signals a networked proximity detector of another antenna to increase its transmission power to offset (in full or in part) the decrease in the power of the transmitter of the first antenna (e.g., if the proximity detector of the other antenna does not indicate an unacceptable proximity condition) and then processing proceeds to the inputting operation 702 for another iteration.
In one implementation, the adjustment operation 710 decreases the transmission power to satisfy SAR constraints, although this adjustment may occur in one iteration or over multiple iterations. Likewise, the increase in the transmission power of another antenna subsystem may occur in one iteration or over multiple iterations.
Individual operations illustrated in
Accordingly, various implementations of an electrical device are disclosed, wherein the electrical device comprises means for detecting a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between a RF transmitter and an RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline and means for adjusting transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. For example, in one implementation, a detuning monitor detecting a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between a RF transmitter and an RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline, and a proximity monitor adjusts transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. In another implementation, a transmission power adjustment circuit or the RF transmitters themselves may adjust the transmission power, for example, responsive to a signal from one or more proximity detectors.
Among other implementations of the described technology, a method is disclosed including detecting a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between a radio frequency (RF) transmitter and an RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline and adjusting transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. The method may include a detecting operation that includes measuring VSWR between an input and an output of a detuning monitor coupled between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna. The method may include a detecting operation that includes measuring VSWR between an input and an output of a directional coupler connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna.
The method may employ a detuning monitor that includes a coupler connected to the RF transmitter and a circulator connected between the coupler and the RF antenna, wherein the detecting operation includes measuring VSWR between an input of a coupler and an output of the circulator. A first port of the circulator is connected to an output of the coupler, a second port of the circulator is connected to the RF antenna, and a third port of the circulator is connected to a proximity detector. The method may include an adjusting operation that determines whether the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition using the proximity detector.
The method may include detecting an unacceptable detuning of the RF antenna based on a change in the VSWR from a VSWR baseline that fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. The method may include communicatively connecting a proximity detector associated with the RF transmitter to another proximity detector associated with another RF transmitter and signaling the other RF transmitter to increase transmission power to another RF antenna.
The method may include communicatively connecting a proximity detector associated with the RF transmitter to another proximity detector associated with another RF transmitter and signaling the other RF transmitter to increase transmission power to another RF antenna, if a detected change in the VSWR associated with the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna satisfies an acceptable VSWR condition.
Among other implementations of the described technology, an electronic device is disclosed that includes a detuning monitor circuit configured to detect a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between a radio frequency (RF) transmitter and an RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline and a proximity detector circuit configured to adjust transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. The detuning monitor circuit may include a directional coupler connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna and to measure VSWR between an input and an output of the directional coupler.
The detuning monitor circuit may include a coupler configured for connection to the RF transmitter and to measure VSWR between an input of a coupler and an output of a circulator. A first port of the circulator may be connected to an output of the coupler, a second port of the circulator may be configured for connection to the RF antenna, and a third port of the circulator may be connected to the proximity detector circuit. The proximity detector circuit may be further configured to determine whether the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition.
The proximity detector circuit of the electronic device may be configured to detect an unacceptable detuning of the RF antenna based on a change in the VSWR from a VSWR baseline that fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. The proximity detector circuit of the electronic device may be connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna, and the electronic device may include another proximity detector circuit communicatively connected to the proximity detector circuit. The other proximity detector circuit is connected to another RF transmitter, and the proximity detector circuit is configured to signal the other RF transmitter to increase transmission power to another RF antenna.
The proximity detector circuit of the electronic device may be connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna and the electronic device may include another proximity detector circuit communicatively connected to the proximity detector circuit. The other proximity detector circuit is connected to another RF transmitter. The proximity detector circuit is configured to signal the other RF transmitter connected to increase transmission power to another RF antenna, if a detected change in the VSWR associated with the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna satisfies an acceptable VSWR condition.
Among other implementations of the described technology, a transmission system is disclosed that includes an antenna and a detuning monitor circuit coupled to the antenna. The detuning monitor may include a first coupler port and a second coupler port in communication with the antenna. The detuning monitor may also include a first sense port, and a second sense port. The transmission system may also include a power amplifier including a gain control input and a signal output in communication with the first coupler port. The transmission system may also include a proximity detector circuit including a first input in communication with the first sense port, a second input in communication with the second sense port, and an output in communication with the gain control input. The proximity detector circuit of the transmission system may be configured to determine a VSWR value based on a first signal detected at the first input and a second signal detected at the second input. The proximity detector circuit of the transmission system may be also or alternatively be configured to communicate a gain control signal to the gain control input, wherein the gain control signal is based on the VSWR value.
Among other implementations of the described technology, an electronic device is disclosed including a radio frequency (RF) transmitter, an RF antenna, a detuning monitor circuit configured to detect a change in a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna relative to a predetermined VSWR baseline, and a proximity detector circuit configured to adjust transmission power of a carrier wave transmitted from the RF transmitter, if the change fails to satisfy an acceptable VSWR condition. The proximity detector circuit may be connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna and the electronic device may include another RF transmitter, another RF antenna, and another proximity detector circuit communicatively connected to the proximity detector circuit. The other proximity detector circuit may be connected between the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna. The proximity detector circuit may be configured to signal the other RF transmitter via the other proximity detector to increase transmission power to another RF antenna.
The proximity detector circuit of the electronic device may be connected between the RF transmitter and the RF antenna. The electronic device may include another RF transmitter, another RF antenna, and another proximity detector circuit communicatively connected to the proximity detector circuit. The other proximity detector circuit may be connected between the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna. The proximity detector circuit may be configured to signal the other RF transmitter via the other proximity detector circuit to increase transmission power to another RF antenna, if a detected change in the VSWR associated with the other RF transmitter and the other RF antenna satisfies an acceptable VSWR condition.
The implementations of the invention described herein are implemented as logical steps in one or more computer systems. The logical operations of the presently described technology may be implemented (1) as a sequence of processor-implemented steps executing in one or more computer systems and (2) as interconnected machine or circuit modules within one or more computer systems. The implementation is a matter of choice, dependent on the performance requirements of the computer system implementing the invention. Accordingly, the logical operations making up the embodiments of the invention described herein are referred to variously as operations, steps, objects, or modules. Furthermore, it should be understood that logical operations may be performed in any order, adding and omitting as desired, unless explicitly claimed otherwise or a specific order is inherently necessitated by the claim language.
The above specification, examples, and data provide a complete description of the structure and use of exemplary embodiments of the invention. Since many implementations of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended. Furthermore, structural features of the different embodiments may be combined in yet another implementation without departing from the recited claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4016490 | Weckenmann et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4729129 | Koerner | Mar 1988 | A |
4806944 | Jacomb-Hood | Feb 1989 | A |
5166679 | Vranish et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5212621 | Panter | May 1993 | A |
5408690 | Ishikawa | Apr 1995 | A |
5564086 | Cygan | Oct 1996 | A |
6178310 | Jeong | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6657595 | Phillips | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6989745 | Milinusic et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7009944 | Hulbert | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7053629 | Nevermann | May 2006 | B2 |
7062288 | Raaf et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071776 | Forrester et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7124193 | Leung et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7146139 | Nevermann | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151382 | Kean | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7162264 | Vance | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167093 | Fergusson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7541874 | Maeda | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7729715 | Love et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7917175 | Song | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8063375 | Cobbinah et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8134461 | Van Dorrn | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8208423 | Liu et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8213982 | Marlett et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8269511 | Jordan | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8324549 | Romero et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8326385 | Brogle | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8401851 | Bushey | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8417296 | Caballero et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8432322 | Amm et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8442572 | Borran et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8466839 | Schlub et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8483632 | Asrani et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8515496 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8547952 | Liu et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548388 | Chiu et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559999 | Hu et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565205 | Ho et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577289 | Schlub et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8723531 | Harrison | May 2014 | B2 |
8723749 | Lin et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8775103 | Jayaraj et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8781437 | Ngai et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8792930 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8798695 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8860526 | Manssen | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8922443 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8975903 | Salter et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9325355 | Pecen | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9337833 | Siska | May 2016 | B2 |
9466872 | Sanchez et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
20020009976 | Rashidi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020039028 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020175814 | Wadlow et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030064732 | McDowell et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030064761 | Nevermann | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030210203 | Phillips et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214310 | McIntosh | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030228846 | Berliner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040021608 | Kojima et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040075613 | Jarmuszewski et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040108957 | Umehara et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113847 | Qi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040160378 | Abrams et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040222925 | Fabrega-Sanchez et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050017906 | Man et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050093624 | Qllikainen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050184914 | Ollikainen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060244663 | Fleck et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070111681 | Alberth, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120745 | Qi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122307 | Da Costa et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080051165 | Burgan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055160 | Kim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080158065 | Wee | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080218493 | Patten et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080254836 | Qi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090047998 | Alberth, Jr. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090230884 | Van Doorn | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253459 | Naganuma et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090295648 | Dorsey et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090305742 | Caballero | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325511 | Kim | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100026664 | Geaghan | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052997 | Kan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100056210 | Bychkov et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100067419 | Liu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100113111 | Wong et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100234058 | Hu et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234081 | Wong et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100279751 | Pourseyed et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100283691 | Su et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100317302 | Greenwood et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321325 | Springer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001675 | Lee | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012793 | Amm et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012794 | Schlub et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110043408 | Shi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110063042 | Mendolia | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110117973 | Asrani et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124363 | Calvarese et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110157077 | Martin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110199267 | Hayashi | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110222469 | Ali et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110250928 | Schlub et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110298669 | Rao | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120021707 | Forrester et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120021800 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023225 | Imes et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120044115 | McCaughey et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120071195 | Chakraborty et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120074961 | Herrmann | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120133561 | Konanur et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147801 | Ho et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164962 | Lin et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172079 | Baldemair et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120178494 | Haim et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190398 | Leukkunen | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120214422 | Shi et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223865 | Lie et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120231784 | Kazmi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120270519 | Ngai et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120270592 | Ngai et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120295554 | Greene | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120298497 | Maeda et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120299772 | Shtrom et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120315847 | Li et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329517 | Elin | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329524 | Kent et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130005413 | Brogle et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130016621 | Kil et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130026846 | Gianesello et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130033400 | Chiang | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130045700 | Stallman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050046 | Jarvis et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051261 | Kazmi et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130120257 | Park et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130122827 | Ali et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127677 | Lin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130137487 | Sato | May 2013 | A1 |
20130149957 | Desclos et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130157564 | Shi | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169348 | Shi | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130178167 | Lockerbie et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130178174 | Geris et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130203363 | Gratt et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130210477 | Peter | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130217342 | Abdul-Gaffoor et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130241670 | Mikhemar | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130278474 | Lenormand et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293244 | Leek | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300618 | Yarga et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310105 | Sagae et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310106 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130314365 | Woolley et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130335291 | Judson | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140015595 | VanAusdall et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140021801 | Kao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140066124 | Novet | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140071008 | Desclos et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078094 | Yang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140087663 | Burchill et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098491 | Wang | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098693 | Tabet et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140128032 | Muthukumar | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139380 | Ouyang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140141733 | Wong et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140152121 | Ku | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140155000 | Erkens | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140159980 | Finegold | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173269 | Varoglu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176938 | Yang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140206297 | Schlub et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140274188 | Thorson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274189 | Moller et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280450 | Luna | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140292587 | Yarga et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140307570 | Hong | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140315592 | Schlub et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140357207 | Ma | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140357313 | Mercer et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140370929 | Khawand et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150031408 | Kalla et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150053575 | Bridges et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150141080 | Standing | May 2015 | A1 |
20150169093 | Nakao | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150177371 | Abbasi et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150199042 | Standing et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150200444 | Mercer et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150201385 | Mercer et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150201387 | Khawand et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150288074 | Harper et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160049978 | Mercer et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160064801 | Han et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160098053 | Khawand et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160164563 | Khawand et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160204836 | Lee et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1179864 | Apr 1998 | CN |
102064812 | May 2011 | CN |
202276339 | Jun 2012 | CN |
102714346 | Oct 2012 | CN |
103248747 | Aug 2013 | CN |
843421 | May 1998 | EP |
1298809 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1469550 | Dec 2004 | EP |
100504407 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1732167 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2015548 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2276108 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2381527 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2383364 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2405534 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2410661 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2509229 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2509229 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2568605 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2787780 | Oct 2014 | EP |
2293277 | Mar 1996 | GB |
2380359 | Apr 2003 | GB |
2409345 | Jun 2005 | GB |
2002043957 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2007194995 | Aug 2007 | JP |
0042797 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0148858 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2004015813 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004091046 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005018046 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2007043150 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2009149023 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2011051554 | May 2011 | WO |
2011058128 | May 2011 | WO |
2012152103 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012061582 | May 2012 | WO |
2012091651 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012113754 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012122113 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2012122116 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2012143936 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2012176217 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013011352 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013101106 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013103948 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013141791 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013165419 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013169527 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014036532 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2015134117 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016111897 | Jul 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Updated Search Report for PCT/US2014/072412, mailed Oct. 5, 2015, 3 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Updated Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/072412, mailed Oct. 5, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/072413, dated Jul. 16, 2015, 16 pages. |
“SAR Evaluation Considerations for Laptop, Notebook, Netbook and Tablet Computers,” Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division, May 28, 2013, 14 pages. |
Hochwald, et al “Minimizing Exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation in Portable Devices”, In Proceedings of Information Theory and Applications Workshop, Feb. 5, 2012, pp. 107. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/US2014/039479, dated Jun. 15, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion of IPEA for PCT/US2014/065856, mailed Oct. 13, 2015, 6 pages. |
Myllymaki, Sami “Capacitive Antenna Sensor for Proximity Recognition”; http://herkules.oulu/fi/isbn9789514299155/isbn9789514299155.pdf, dated Nov. 30, 2012, 60 pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/065856, dated Feb. 4, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/037593, dated Aug. 20, 2015; mailed Aug. 31, 2015, 13 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report for PCT/US2015/037563 dated Aug. 20, 2015, 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/037563, mailed Aug. 31, 2015, 6 pages. |
“Digital, Silicon Microphone has 2.6×1.6mm2 Footprint”, Published on: Dec. 12, 2005, Available at: http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/Digital-Silicon-Microphone-has-2-6-x-1-6-mm-footprint-471386. |
Khawand, et al., “Radiating Structure with Integrated Proximity Sensing” formerly titled as “SAR Sensor Execution where Part of One or More Antennas is on the Exterior Surface of a Mobile Device”, unfiled US Patent Application (filed herewith). |
Holopainen, et al., “Broadband Equivalent Circuit Model for Capacitive Coupling Element-Based Mobile Terminal Antenna”, In IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 9, Jul. 8, 2010, 4 pages. |
Ozyalcin, et al., “SAR Simulations in Wireless Communication and Safety Discussions in the Society”, In Proceedings of Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, vol. 10, Issue 2, Dec. 31, 2013, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, Pai, et al., “Radio Frequency (RF) Power Back-Off Optimization for Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Compliance”, filed Jun. 14, 2013. |
“Low SAR Solution for Tablet PC”, Published on: Sep. 27, 2011, Available at: http://www.auden.com.tw/TRC/webspace/disk/AudenSARSolutiondatasheet—110927.pdf. |
“Semtech Launches Smart Proximity Sensor for Short-Range Human Presence Detection & SAR Regulations in Mobile & Tablet PC Applications”, Published on: Jul. 24, 2012, Available at: http://www.semtech.com/Press-Releases/2012/Semtech-Launches-Smart-Proximity-Sensor-for-Short-Range-Human-Presence-Detection-SAR-Regulations-in-Mobile-Tablet-PC-Applications.html. |
Toit, Riaan Du, “Using Proximity Sensing to Meet Mobile Device FCC SAR Reulations”, Published on: Apr. 17, 2012, Available at: http://www.eetimes.com/General/PrintView/431201. |
Khawand, et al., “Radio Frequency (RF) Power Back-Off Optimization for Specific Abdorption Rate (SAR) Compliance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, filed Jun. 14, 2013, 40 pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/042023, Aug. 29, 2014, 11 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/039479, Sep. 19, 2014, 11 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/072411, Mar. 27, 2015, 10 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, Unitd States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/072412, Mar. 30, 2015, 11 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/072414, Apr. 14, 2015, 9 Pages. |
Mrazovac, “Reaching the Next Level of Indoor Human Presence Detection: An RF Based Solution”, 11th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services, Oct. 16, 2013, 4 pages. |
I.B. Bonev et al, “Parmetric Study of Antenna with Parasitic Element for Improving the Hearing Aids Compatibility of Mobile Phones and the Specific Absorption Rate in the Head”, Proceedings in Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Marrakesh, Morocco, Mar. 20-23, 2011, 5 pages. |
J. Poutanen, “Interaction Between Mobile Terminal Antenna and User” Helsinki University of Technology Master's Thesis, Oct. 9, 2007, 100 pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2014/042023, Mar. 2, 2015, 6 Pages. |
Sterner, et al., “Development of an Antenna Sensor for Occupant Detection in Passenger Transportation”, In Proceedings of Procedia Engineering, vol. 47, Sep. 9, 2012, 6 pages. |
Poutanent, et al., “Behavior of Mobile Terminal Antennas near Human Tissue at a Wide Frequency Range”, In International Workshop on Antenna Technology: Small Antennas and Novel Metamaterials, Mar. 4, 2008, 4 pages. |
Curto, et al., “Circular Loop Antenna Operating at 434 MHz for Medical Applications: Loop-Tissue Interaction”, In Proceeding of: Irish Signals and Systems Conference, Jul. 2006, 6 pages. |
Rogerson, James, “Samsung reveals a folding phone-to-tablet prototype”, http://www.techradar.com/us/news/phone-and-communications/mobile..nes/samsung-reveals-a-folding-phone-to-tablet-prototype-1197384,7 pages. |
Mercer, et al., “Dynamic Antenna Power Control for Multi-Context Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,964, filed Jan. 5, 2016, 52 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,351, Feb. 20, 2015, 10 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,088, Mar. 23, 2015, 37 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,652, Jul. 16, 2015, 9 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,086, Jul. 22, 2015, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,529, Sep. 22, 2015, 18 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, Sep. 23, 2015, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,086, Nov. 30, 2015, 19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/562,212, Dec. 18, 2015, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/927,287, Dec. 21, 2015, 28 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,652, Dec. 23, 2016, 9 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,529, Jan. 22, 2016, 18 pages. |
Office Action Issued in United Kingdom Patent Application No. 1219096.3, Mailed Date: Jan. 28, 2016, 4 Pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, Mar. 2, 2016, 20 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,652, Apr. 18, 2016 9 pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/927,287”, Mailed Date: May 11, 2016, 34 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,866, Mailed Date: May 19, 2016, 7 pages. |
Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201380055749.X, Mailed Date: Jun. 6, 2016, 12 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, Jun. 14, 2016, 21 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/562,212, Jun. 17, 2016, 17 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/506,478, Jul. 1, 2016, 10 pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/066441, Mailed Date: Dec. 12, 2013, 12 Pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/US2013/066441, dated May 7, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Second International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/072412; mailing date: Oct. 5, 2015, 11 pages. |
Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/072411, Mailed Date: Nov. 26, 2015, 7 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion of International Preliminary Examining Authority for PCT/US2014/072412, mailed Dec. 4, 2015, 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority for PCT/US2014/072414 mailed Dec. 9, 2015, 29 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority for PCT/US2014/072413 mailed Dec. 17, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Seraching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/062851, mailed Feb. 5, 2016, 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/065856, date mailed: Feb. 10, 2016, 14 pages. |
International Preliminary Report of Patentability issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/072412; mailed date: Mar. 22, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/072411; date mailed Mar. 23, 2016, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/072414; date mailed Mar. 23, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/072413, date mailed Mar. 24, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, Second Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority for PCT/2015/037563, mailed Jun. 1, 2016, 5 pages. |
Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/052769, Mailed Date: Jul. 7, 2016, 5 Pages. |
Office Action Issued in Columbian Patent Application No. NC2016/0000122, Mailed Date: Aug. 19, 2016, 2 Pages. |
Ban, et al., “A Dual-Loop Antenna Design for Hepta-Band WWAN/LTE Metal-Rimmed Smartphone Applications”, In Journal of IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, Issue 1, Jan. 2015, 8 pages. |
Chung, et al., “A dual-mode antenna for wireless charging and Near Field Communication”, In Proceedings of EEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Jul. 24, 2015, 5 pages. |
Design of Printed Trace Differential Loop Antennas, http://www.silabs.com/Support%20Documents/TechnicalDocs/AN639.pdf, Retrieved on: Nov. 17, 2016, 28 pages. |
Mumcu, et al., “Small Wideband Double-Loop Antennas Using Lumped Inductors and Coupling Capacitors”, In Journal of IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 10, Feb. 4, 2011, 5 pages. |
Osoinach, Bryce, “Proximity Capacitive Sensor Technology for Touch Sensing Applications”, In White Paper of Proximity Sensing, 2007, 7 pages. |
Pal, et al., “A low-profile switched-beam dual-band capacitively coupled Square Loop Antenna”, In Proceedings of Antennas and Propagation Conference, Nov. 11, 2013, 5 Pages. |
Pal, et al., “Dual-Band Low-Profile Capacitively Coupled Beam-Steerable Square-Loop Antenna”, In Journal of IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 62, Issue 3, Mar. 2014, pp. 1204-1211. |
Quddious, et al., “An inkjet printed meandered dipole antenna for RF passive sensing applications”, In Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Apr. 2016, 4 Pages. |
Standing, et al., “Radiofrequency-Wave-Transparent Capacitive Sensor Pad”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/384,742, filed Dec. 20, 2016, 26 pages. |
Harper et al., “Active Proximity Sensor With Adaptive Electric Field Control”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/413,196, filed Jan. 23, 2016, 35 pages. |
Harper, “Loop Antenna With Integrated Proximity Sensing”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/412,997, filed Jan. 23, 2016, 32 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,866, Mailed Date: Oct. 17, 2016, 7 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, Oct. 26, 2016, 25 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,964, Mailed Date: Nov. 30, 2016, 8 pages. |
First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480031132.9, Mailed Date: Nov. 2, 2016, 10 Pages. |
First Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480033869.4, Mailed Date: Dec. 19, 2016, 6 Pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2015/037563, mailed Sep. 13, 2016, 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2015/052769, mailed Sep. 29, 2016, 16 pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/062851”, Mailed Date: Oct. 28, 2016, 8 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150382307 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |