The present invention relates generally to communication systems, and more particularly to bearer loss detection.
Multimedia services over IP (Internet Protocol) are a critical service for service providers and service providers are looking at VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) as the first major application to use this real time service. VoIP is being built mainly using the IMS (IP Multimedia Subsystem) core network and various access networks, which include broadband connections such as cable, DSL (Digital Subscriber Line), and fiber and also various wireless access networks such as DORA, WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access), LTE (Long Term Evolution), etc.
Voice service in communication systems is an essential service. Therefore, all aspects of voice service have to perform extremely well. One area of interest is the area of detecting bearer loss. Detecting bearer loss during a call is a non-trivial process as this requires the many network elements both at the signaling and the bearer level to detect that there has been a loss in connectivity.
This is typically further complicated by the fact that the design of such networks essentially separate the signaling and the bearer network elements to a good degree. This separation makes the detection and communication of the detection even more complicated. The bearer loss or connection loss could have happened in the core network elements such as a MGW (Media GateWay) or MRF (Media Resource Function). The bearer loss or connection loss could also have happened in the access network elements such as a RNC (Radio Network Controller), GWs or even the mobile unit, also known as an access terminal, itself.
A first problem that is encountered is how can a communication system detect a loss of bearer in the core network.
A second problem that is encountered is how can a communication system detect a loss of bearer in the access network.
A third problem that is encountered is for various wireless access networks, the originating party of the session can go dormant on the packet access channel while the called party is reached/alerted and finally answers. This occurs because of the lack of packet data activity on the originators access connection. This issue can cause voice clipping and call setup delay.
One existing mechanism which can be used to help detect bearer loss is using RTCP (Real-time Transport Control Protocol). RTCP is mainly designed to determine network performance and various other aspects of the bearer connection, but loss of connection can also be gleaned from RTCP packets. Note that this kind of a protocol is mainly an end-to-end protocol and if the end devices (such as the mobile unit) are the ones that are having the issues then this protocol is not very effective. Moreover, because of the bandwidth cost associated with the effective use of RTCP, this protocol is generally not supported or used.
Therefore, a need exists for a way to determine when there is bearer loss in a communication system. Further, this determination needs to differentiate between true bearer loss and legitimate lack of packet data activity from one of the parties in a call.
The present invention provides a method for detection of bearer loss in an IP-based multimedia session. If the session is setup as a VoIP call between an Access Terminal (AT) and another user B, then this session is a two-way session where traffic is expected to flow in both directions. During the process of session setup, the network elements involved in the signaling of the session establish the session. That is, the AT in conjunction with the IMS core establishes the VoIP session. As part of the VoIP session establishment the IMS core and the AT negotiate the media types, hence bandwidth, for the sessions and also the connection points, such as the IP address and ports of the bearer entities. This negotiated media information is called codec information.
The codec for this session is also negotiated which can tell the bearer node in the access network, such as the SGW, what packets per second count is expected. For example, the Policy and Charging Rules Function (PCRF) can tell the SGW the source and destination IP addresses of session and also that the codec is Enhanced Variable Rate CODEC (EVRC), the payload type # is 96 and the expected rate of packets is 50 packets/sec. The SGW can use this information to assess the flow of traffic in each direction.
The IMS core communicates the codec information to the PCRF for policy enforcement and gating purposes. The PCRF in turn sends this codec information to the Signaling Gateway (SGW) and the Packet Data Network Gateway (PGW). The codec information includes the connection information and the direction of traffic flow to and from the core network.
At this point the SGW knows what to expect from the core network side and also what to expect from the access network side. The SGW can now monitor the traffic flow and determine if there is a discrepancy in the flow of traffic and report this discrepancy to the PCRF.
The present invention can be better understood with reference to
AT 101 is the VoIP capable mobile device in this scenario.
Base Station (BTS) 103 sends and receives over the air signals with AT 101.
Radio Network Controller (RNC) 105 controls BTS 103 and connects to SGW 107.
SGW 107 is a network element that bridges the connection from the access network and the core network via PGW 109. Policy enforcement can be done within SGW 107, which connection is made to PCRF 111.
PGW 109 preferably works in conjunction with SGW 107 to connect to IP core network 115. Policy enforcement can be done within PGW 109 and signals would be sent to PCRF 111.
PCRF 111 is the main policy engine within network 100. PCRF 111 is preferably a signaling-only element. In an exemplary embodiment, no bearer passes through PCRF 111.
IMS Core 113 is the application core and preferably includes a P-CSCF and a S-CSCF. IMS Core 113 is preferably a signaling-only element. In an exemplary embodiment, no bearer passes through IMS Core 113.
IP Network 115 is a packet switched network.
MGCF 117 controls MGW 119. MGCF 117 is preferably a signaling-only element. In an exemplary embodiment, no bearer passes through MGCF 117.
MGW 119 connects the IP bearer to the TDM bearer.
P-CSCF receives Invite message 201 and forwards this message to PCRF 111 as Indicate Session Setup message 202. Indicate Session Setup message 202 preferably includes near end port information, application type, and traffic direction. In an exemplary embodiment, PCRF 111 establishes policy and communicates this information to SGW 107.
PCRF 111 communicates the Session setup information and the bearer characteristics to SGW 107 by sending Indicate Session Setup message 203. SGW 107 preferably uses this information to adjust the dormancy timers on the originating side so that the originating access link remains active during the call setup.
During call setup, IMS Core 113 and/or PCRF 111 can tell SGW 107 the state of the session. In the case of the origination side, PCRF 111 can tell the originating SGW 107 that a session establishment is being attempted. This will prompt SGW 107 to override or extend the dormancy timer on the originating side, thus avoiding clipping and other end-user issues. This ability to intelligently make a decision on the access network connection solves the problem of voice clipping and call setup delay by incorrectly recognizing a lack of packet data activity as dormancy by the originating party of the session while the called party is reached/alerted and finally answers. This occurs because of the lack of packet data activity on the originators access connection.
P-CSCF passes Invite message 201 to the S-CSCF as Invite message 204.
S-CSCF determines the route for this call via ENUM or DNS lookup and sends this call to MGCF 117 via Invite message 205 for delivery into the PSTN.
Upon receiving Invite message 205, MGCF 117 sends Get Bearer Address message 206 to MGW 119. MGW 117 sets up the bearer connection for this call and returns the bearer address to MGCF 117.
MGCF 117 receives the bearer address from MGW 119 and passes this media information to S-CSCF via Session Progress message 207.
S-CSCF receives Session Progress message 207 from MGCF 117. S-CSCF passes the media information from Session Progress message 207 to P-CSCF via Session Progress message 208.
P-CSCF receives Session Progress message 208 and sends this information to PCRF 111 via Indicate message 209. PCRF 111 preferably establishes policy and communicate this information to SGW 107.
PCRF 111 communicates the Session setup information and the bearer characteristics to SGW 107 via Indicate message 210. SGW 107 preferably uses this information to adjust the bearer loss timers on the originating side. Since SGW 107 now knows the expected traffic characteristics from the Core Network via MGW 119, SGW 107 can keep track of the received and transmitted bearer traffic. Deviation from this traffic pattern for a configurable duration of time (bearer loss timer) will cause SGW 107 to signal to the call control layer of a possible bearer loss.
If SGW 107 detects that there has been no packets flowing from the core network to the access side for a specific amount of time, SGW 107 can send a message to PCRF 111 alerting PCRF 111 of a possible loss of bearer issue. The signaling network elements can act on this by checking to see if the signaling connection is still up or alerting the user of the issue. This provides the ability to detect a loss of bearer in the core network.
P-CSCF passes the media information from MGW 119 to AT 101 via Session Progress message 211.
When the called party answers the call, MGCF 117 sends OK message 212 to S-CSCF.
S-CSCF sends OK message 213, which indicates that the called party answers the call request, to the P-CSCF.
P-CSCF sends this information to PCRF 111 via Indicate message 214. Indicate message 214 preferably includes far end port information and traffic direction and characteristics. PCRF preferably establishes policy and communicates this information to SGW 107.
PCRF 111 can send any changes in the media characteristics to SGW 107 via Indicate message 215. From this point on SGW 107 now knows the expected traffic characteristics from MGW 119 and also from the access network, it can keep track of the received and transmitted bearer traffic. Deviation from this traffic pattern for a configurable duration of time, for example a bearer loss timer, causes SGW 107 to signal to the call control layer of a possible bearer loss.
Armed with this knowledge, if SGW 107 detects that there has been no packets flowing from the access side for a predetermined amount of time or detects that the access side went dormant, then SGW 107 can send a message to PCRF 111 alerting it of a possible loss of bearer. The signaling network elements can act on this by checking to see if the signaling connection is still up or by alerting the user of the issue. Note that on the access side, if the battery of AT 101 is pulled during a session or if AT 101 runs into an RF hole then the access side puts the connection into dormancy and nothing else is done. In this scenario SGW 107 will recognize the discrepancy in the current behavior and the expected behavior and signal the signaling entities to take action. This allows the communication system to detect a loss of bearer in the access network.
P-CSCF sends call answer message 216 to AT 101.
While this invention has been described in terms of certain examples thereof, it is not intended that it be limited to the above description, but rather only to the extent set forth in the claims that follow.