The application pertains to optically based smoke detectors. More particularly, the application pertains to such detectors that provide improved signal-to-noise ratios through a use of selectively configured optical blocks.
Various types of optical, scattering, smoke detectors are known. They provide useful warnings of developing smoke conditions. One such structure is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,521,907 (“the '907 patent”), entitled “Miniature Photoelectric Sensing Chamber”, which issued Feb. 18, 2003 and is assigned to the assignee hereof. The '907 patent is incorporated by reference herein.
In summary, such optical smoke detectors or multi-criteria smoke detectors that use an optical signal to detect fire include a sensing chamber where smoke enters an optical system to detect light scattered by smoke particulate, possibly other transducers (thermistors, etc.), electronic control circuits, and a communication system to process signals from the transducers. Information from a detector can be transmitted to a fire alarm control panel. However, some types of detectors do not communicate with a control panel, but have an integrated alarm system.
In known smoke and fire detectors, the optical system includes an optical emitter and a receiver that are integrated with the sensing chamber of the detector through a use of an optic part holder. Among other functions, this part holder facilitates automatic assembly of the detector.
The optical system has to meet various needs and requirements to be suitable for its purpose. Known needs and requirements can include acceptable optical sensitivity to guarantee a good signal to noise ratio in a presence of smoke, immunity to small non-smoke particulate matter or bugs that enter the sensing chamber, and immunity to condensation and humidity.
Small size due to reduced chamber volume is an asset as is an ability to cost effectively assemble such detectors using automatic placement machines.
As those of skill will understand, the optical emitter and the receiver have to be located so that, without smoke, only a very little amount of light reaches the receiver after multiple reflections in the sensing chamber. On the other hand, in the presence of smoke, a sufficient amount of the light projected by the optical emitter is scattered by smoke particles and collected by the receiver so that the presence of smoke can be evaluated.
It has also been recognized that a variety of interfering phenomena can adversely impact a performance of such devices. These include dust, insects, or small objects that can enter the sensing chamber and cause a signal drift or false alarms. High humidity or condensation phenomena in the sensing chamber can also effect unwanted signal variations.
Different configurations of the optical system in commercial fire detectors are known. The optical emitter and the receiver can be soldered to a printed circuit board. An optical set-up is assured through the use of one or more molded optic part holders. The optic part holder can also reduce a beam of the light from the optical emitter in order to get a larger optical signal only in the presence of the smoke in the sensing chamber.
While disclosed embodiments can take many different forms, specific embodiments hereof are shown in the drawings and will be described herein in detail with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles hereof and the best mode of practicing the same and is not intended to limit the claims hereof to the specific embodiment illustrated.
Embodiments hereof advantageously use an elongated optical block that is described below. In this molded optical block, a central portion provides spaced apart emitter and receiver zones. In a disclosed embodiment, two mirror-like V-shaped barriers—one nearer an emitter, the “emitter barrier”, and one closer to a receiver, the “receiver barrier”—face one another.
The emitter barrier is directly illuminated by the emitter. Small objects that could enter a sensing chamber through an inflow filter settle on its upper surface and scatter light. However, this light is intercepted by the receiver barrier. On the other hand, the small objects or water droplets that settle on the receiver barrier are not directly illuminated by the emitter because they are under a shadow of the emitter barrier.
These two barriers are separated by a lower plane. The two barriers and lateral sides form a small basin or depression that can contain the small objects that enter a chamber filter, such as condensed water drops. This feature can prevent significant output signal variations.
A resulting effect is that condensation, dust, insects, or other small objects that could settle on the optical block do not cause a significant increase in an output optical signal.
As described below, a distance between the two barriers and their geometry are such as to maximize optical sensitivity and provide immunity to the condensation, the dust, the insects, and the other small objects that could enter the sensing chamber.
Four flat pick-up areas are provided on the optical block for an automatic placement of the optical block. Various pick-up processes are available for the automatic placement of the optical block. It is also possible to pick up the optical block with two different nozzles that aspire the optical block through upper or lower pick-up regions. It will be understood that an exact manufacturing process is not a limitation hereof.
The upper pick-up areas are bounded by two steps. As a result, drops formed by humidity condensation in these areas do not interfere with an emission radiation cone, thereby causing the output signal variations.
With respect to
Emitted radiant energy from the emitter 22, which can include a light emitting or laser diode, exits the molded channel 22a via an output port 22c. Scattered radiant energy from the sensing chamber 12a travels via an input port 24c to the receiver sensor 24 where it is sensed and coupled to the control circuits 16 as would be understood by those of skill in the art.
A V-shaped emitter barrier 30 has two planar side surfaces 30-1, 30-2. A V-shaped receiver barrier 32 has two planar side surfaces 32-1, 32-2. The barriers 30, 32 are located displaced from respective ports 22c, 24c along a center line A of the optical block 20.
The emitter barrier 30 is directly illuminated by the emitter 22, which is intermittently energized by the control circuits 16. Small objects, dust, drops of water due to humidity and temperature changes, or bugs that might enter the sensing chamber 12a through an input filter, not shown, might settle on an upper surface and scatter light. Such scattered light will be intercepted by the receiver barrier 32 and not contribute to locally generated noise. Advantageously, such objects that settle on the receiver barrier 32 are not directly illuminated because they are under a shadow of the emitter barrier 30.
A depressed separation plane 38 provides a region into which such objects, including the drops of water, can fall; this plane directs them away from either the emitted radiant energy from the emitter 22 or that arriving at receiver sensor 24.
An optical sensitivity and immunity ratio can be adjusted to provide desirable optical sensitivity and good immunity to the dust, condensation, and the small objects that might settle on the optical block 20 by providing an emitter angle on an order of seventy degrees plus/minus twenty five degrees. A receiver angle can be adjusted accordingly. The receiver angle can vary from seventy degrees between plus one hundred ten degrees (straight barrier) and minus twenty five degrees.
Molding the described barrier planar side surfaces, such as 30-1, 30-2, 32-1, 32-2, so that substantially vertical barrier planes are formed is effective in avoiding settling of non-smoke particulate matter on edges of the barriers. This minimizes false alarms and output signal drifts. A slope between ninety degrees and sixty degrees relative to the center line A provides acceptable noise immunity.
A plurality of pick-and-place areas 40a, 40b, 40c, 40d can also be provided to facilitate pick and place operations during an automatic assembly process. A U-shaped metal shield 42 can be attached to a receiver end of the optical block 20. This shield can partially enclose the receiver 24, isolating it from local noise generating electromagnetic waves.
While a variety of angular settings come within the scope and spirit hereof, with respect to
The optical block 50 is substantially the same as the optical block 20 except that the optical block 50 includes only a single V-shaped barrier/reflector combination 60. Such a barrier element 60 has planar surfaces 60-1, 60-2 arranged in the same configuration as previously described in connection with the emitter barrier 30. Instead of a second V-shaped barrier element, the optical block 50 includes a planar surface 62 as seen
The emitter 22 can be located on a side of the optical block 50 with the barrier element 60. The planar surface 62 can be located on a side of the optical block 50 associated with the receiver 24.
Planar pick surfaces 70a, 70b, 70c, and 7d are located on the optical block 50 as illustrated. The planar surface 62 is oriented so as to be substantially perpendicular to the planar pick surface 70c adjacent thereto. Alternately, the barrier element 60 could be located adjacent to the receiver 24.
A pair of separate optical blocks, such as the optical block 80, could be mounted on a base adjacent to a sensing chamber to form a smoke detector of the general type discussed above.
In summary, optical barriers as described above can be molded of thermoplastic or thermosetting molding materials. A low cost mineral reinforced nylon resin, which can be injection molded by an application of heat and pressure to form parts with good mechanical properties, can be effectively used to manufacture the above described optical blocks.
Such optical blocks can carry and position optical emitters and receivers with a 5 mm (T 1¼) package, whose leads can be bent to facilitate an automatic mounting process of the optical blocks. The optical blocks can be scaled to use the optical emitters and receivers with a 3 mm package.
The optical blocks as described above are designed to be mounted on a support member, such as a printed circuit board using standard assembly processes.
The optical blocks as described above can be supplied in a tape and reel assembly in a dedicated feeder. The optical blocks can be fed to an automatic placement machine for mass production.
The automatic mounting process can include different stages as follows. During pick-up, a vacuum nozzle collects an optical block from a pick-up area, and a first vacuum check can be made to determine if the optical block has been picked up correctly. A camera inspection can be carried out. If a previous check passes, then a camera can measure the optical block and calculate any offset needed to place the optical block precisely. The optical block can be moved to the printed circuit board. A second vacuum check can be carried out to verify that the optical block is still on the vacuum nozzle. The optical block can be placed on the printed circuit board. The optical block can be directly mounted on the printed circuit board.
An emitter can be connected to a driver circuit that pulses it in order to generate light that can be projected into a sensing chamber. Some of that light is scattered by smoke particles onto a receiver, triggering an alarm signal.
The optical blocks and the sensing chamber as described above are designed so that, without smoke, only a small amount of the light from the emitter is scattered toward the receiver as compared to an amount of the light scattered by the smoke entering during a fire.
To complete an assembling process of a fire detector, the printed circuit board with the optical block is inserted between a detector base and plastic parts that form the sensing chamber. Finally, the sensing chamber can be bounded by a cover that might also carry an air inflow filter. The cover conveys the smoke into the sensing chamber.
From the foregoing, it will be observed that numerous variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is to be understood that no limitation with respect to the specific apparatus illustrated herein is intended or should be inferred. It is, of course, intended to cover by the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the scope of the claims.
Further, logic flows depicted in the figures do not require the particular order shown or sequential order to achieve desirable results. Other steps may be provided, steps may be eliminated from the described flows, and other components may be added to or removed from the described embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5400014 | Behlke | Mar 1995 | A |
6521907 | Shoaff | Feb 2003 | B1 |
7075445 | Booth | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7697140 | Iguchi | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7948627 | Iguchi et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8743366 | Numao | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20020089426 | Qualey, III | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030001746 | Bernal | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20080018485 | Kadwell | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20120262714 | Gonzales | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130286391 | Erdtmann | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140085093 | Mittleman | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140168647 | Ju | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150302727 | Piccolo, III | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310732 | Piccolo, III | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103597525 | Feb 2014 | CN |
1 327 966 | Jul 2003 | EP |
2 725 565 | Apr 2014 | EP |
2 397 122 | Jul 2004 | GB |
2012-47753 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2013-54455 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2013-168182 | Aug 2013 | JP |
5351232 | Nov 2013 | JP |
10-1162803 | Jul 2012 | KR |
10-2013-0143655 | Dec 2013 | KR |
10-2014-0040601 | Apr 2014 | KR |
57 942 | Oct 2006 | RU |
128 754 | May 2013 | RU |
I387747 | Mar 2013 | TW |
201329913 | Jul 2013 | TW |
WO 2013030918 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2014068304 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European search report for corresponding EP patent application 15170177.8, dated Oct. 28, 2015. |
English-language translation of patent publication CN 103597525 A, publication date Feb. 19, 2014, patentee Fenwal Controls of Japan, Ltd. |
English-language translation of patent publication JP 2013-54455, publication date Mar. 21, 2013, patentee New Cosmos Electric Corp. |
English-language translation of patent publication JP 2013-168182, publication date Aug. 29, 2013, patentee Nohmi Bosai Ltd. |
English-language translation of abstract for JP patent publication 2012-47753, dated Mar. 8, 2012. |
English-language translation of abstract for JP patent publication 5351232, dated Nov. 27, 2013. |
English-language translation of abstract for KR patent publication 10-1162803, dated Jul. 5, 2012. |
English-language translation of abstract for KR patent publication 10-2013-0143655, dated Dec. 31, 2013. |
English-language translation of abstract for KR patent publication 10-2014-0040601, dated Apr. 3, 2014. |
English-language translation of abstract for TW patent publication I387747, dated Mar. 1, 2013. |
English-language translation of abstract for TW patent publication 201329913, dated Jul. 16, 2013. |
Office Action from corresponding RU patent application 2015122496, dated Apr. 28, 2018. |
English-language translation of Office Action from corresponding RU patent application 2015122496, dated Apr. 28, 2018. |
English-language translation of RU patent 57 942 U1, dated Oct. 27, 2006. |
English-language translation of Abstract for RU patent 128 754 U1, dated May 27, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150379846 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |