The present invention relates to a machine used for sorting documents, e.g. mail, and more particularly relates to a means for retaining the tail of a document away from the entry of a stacker pocket of a document sorting machine once the document has entered the pocket so that the next document to be stacked in that pocket can easily enter the pocket without jamming.
For several years, automated “sort machines” have been available which sort large volumes of documents (e.g. letters, postcards, checks, flats, and the like) into groups having a common identifying criteria (e.g. Zip Codes, mail boxes, etc.). A sort machine is typically comprised a “front end” or feed section and one or more “stacker sections”. The front end feeds the pieces, one-by-one, past a reader (e.g. optical character reader (“OCR”), bar code reader (“BCR”), or the like) and onto a transport that carries it to a designated sort pocket in the stacker section(s).
As the piece passes the reader, the desired criteria on a piece is read and a signal is generated that, in turn, is processed to generate a designation signal for that particular piece. This designation signal, in turn, triggers a diverter or “gate” at the designated pocket in the stacker section as the piece approaches to divert the piece from the transport into the designated pocket where it is stacked with other pieces having the same identifying criteria. Such machines are well known and are commercially-available, e.g. Vsort™ Flat Sort Machine, OMEGA™ Sort Machine, both manufactured and distributed by National Presort, Inc., Dallas, Tex.
One problem that exists in such machines arises from the occasional jamming of pieces as they are diverted into their designated pockets. One major cause of this jamming is that the “tail” of a previously diverted piece is not sufficiently moved away from gate (i.e. pocket entry) and into the pocket so that it may interfere with the leading edge of the next piece diverted into that same pocket. That is, if the tail of the last piece in a particular pocket is not moved sufficiently into the pocket and away from the gate, the leading edge of the next piece can be driven into the tail of the last piece thereby causing a “jam”.
One highly successful “fix” in alleviating jamming in machines of this type is to provide a “kicker” at each pocket which aligns with the gate of that pocket when the gate is actuated to divert a piece into the pocket. This allows smooth entry of the piece from the transport into the pocket. Once the piece has cleared the pocket's entry, the kicker is moved to “kick” the tail of that piece inwardly into the pocket and away from the entry point into the pocket. This allows the next piece to smoothly enter the pocket without engaging the tail of the previous piece. For complete details of such an anti-jamming means, i.e. “kicker”, see U.S. Pat. Re. 34,330, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
While this kicker works extremely well in preventing jamming in most instances (even with a wide variety of different types of mail pieces), there are some instances where the possibility of jamming still exists. For example, if the pieces are too stiff (e.g. glossy brochures) or too flimsy (e.g. tissue paper-like pieces), the tails of these pieces may not stay in the “kicked” position but may have a tendency to return toward the entry of the pocket once the kicker returns to its original position. Hence, the tail of the last sorted piece will be exposed for possible contact with the next piece entering that pocket and jamming can occur. Since the commercial market for this type of sort machines is highly competitive, any improvement in preventing jams may be significant in selling the machines since the downtime required for clearing jams is a major consideration when selecting the machine.
The present invention provides a document sorting machine having at least one pocket for stacking documents according to a common criteria. Each pocket has a means for diverting the document from the transport of the machine and into the designated pocket. The pocket also has a means for moving the tail of the document away from the entry into the pocket and completely into the pocket and a detent means for preventing the tail from moving back towards the pocket entry after the tail of the document has been moved completely into the pocket.
More specifically, the present invention provides a pocket for a document sorting machine wherein the pocket is comprised of a base plate having a means (e.g. a gate) thereon for diverting a document from the machine's transport and into the pocket. The pocket includes a means (e.g. a kicker) on said base plate for moving the tail of the document away from the pocket's entry and completely into the pocket In accordance with the present invention, a detent means is provided on the base plate for preventing the tail of the document from moving back towards the entry after the tail has been moved or kicked into the pocket. This prevents the tail of the sorted document from interfering with the leading edge of the next document diverted into the same pocket, thereby alleviating the possibility of the “jamming” of the documents.
Basically, the detent means is comprised of a detent which is movably mounted within an opening which, in turn, is formed through the base plate at a point inwardly from the pocket's entry. The detent, when in a first position, extends above the base plate to thereby prevent the tail of said document from moving back towards pocket's entry and, when in a second position, allows the tail to be kicked away from the entry and into the pocket. A means biases the detent towards its first position so that the detent will normally extend above the upper surface of the base plate to thereby present a barrier against the return of the tail towards the pocket's entry.
More specifically, the detent is comprised of a bent L-shaped member which is rotatably mounted within the opening in said base plate. The bent L-shaped member, when in its first position, has one leg extending substantially downward through the opening in the base plate and has another leg bent at a angle and extending above said base plate to provide a cam surface facing towards the pocket's entry. This cam surface and/or the depression of the member into the base plate allows the kicker to move the tail of the document over the detent and into the pocket. The means for biasing the member to its first position is preferably a small mass suspended by a chain or the like from the downwardly extending leg of the member but can equally be comprised of spring(s) appropriately positioned between the member and the base plate.
The actual construction operation, and apparent advantages of the present invention will be better understood by referring to the drawings, not necessarily to scale, in which like numerals identify like parts and in which:
While the invention will be described in connection with its preferred embodiments, it will be understood that this invention is not limited thereto. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents that may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.
Referring more particularly to the drawings,
While stacker section 12 is shown as being comprised of a plurality, horizontal stacker bins or “pockets” 21 arranged in pairs having one pocket on either side of the transport 16a, it should be understood, that as far as the present invention is concerned, the layout of the pockets, themselves, can take other configurations. For example, the pockets can be aligned on only one side of the transport in a single row or a plurality of single rows can be vertically spaced one above the others in a multi-level machine, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,109,987, issued May 5, 1992 and which is incorporated in its entirety by reference.
Each pocket 21 has a diverter means (i.e. gate 22, only some of which are numbered in
Turning now to
As shown in
Further, as will be understood by those skilled in this art, each individual module 30 will control the diversion of documents into an adjacent pocket 21 (
Gate 22, when in a first position (
While the kicker described above has proved highly successful in reducing jamming caused by the forward edge of an incoming document contacting the tail of a previously sorted document, unfortunately, the possibly of jamming still exists in isolated instances. That is, with certain types of documents, the tail of the document may not remain in its “kicked” position but instead may try to return towards the entry of the pocket as the kicker returns to its original position.
In accordance with the present invention, a biased detent 40 is provided at the front of pocket 21 which allows the tail of a document to be “kicked” fully into the pocket but prevents the tail from following the kicker back towards the entry of the pocket. More specifically, as best seen in
In the preferred embodiment shown in
While mass 47 is simple and easily maintained, it should be recognized that other biasing means can be used to bias detent 40 towards its normal operation position. For example,
In operation, a document 14 is sorted by front end 11 and is sent down transport 16. When it approaches its designated pocket, gate 22 is actuated to intersect the centerline of transport 14 (
As detent 40 rotates, mass 47 will be inherently lifted. Once the document clears the depressed leg 45, gravity pulls mass 47 downward to thereby detent 40 back to its original position. Now if the tail 14a attempts to return towards its original position along with kicker 23, it abuts the substantially vertical surface 49 of leg 45 (
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3315955 | Schaller | Apr 1967 | A |
4141546 | Queener | Feb 1979 | A |
4162733 | Wiseman | Jul 1979 | A |
4718660 | Daboub | Jan 1988 | A |
4789149 | Ray et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
5109987 | Daboub et al. | May 1992 | A |
5150894 | Ricciardi | Sep 1992 | A |
5166740 | Tanahashi et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
RE34330 | Daboub | Aug 1993 | E |
5417414 | Belec et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419545 | Hutson | May 1995 | A |
5575464 | Martinez et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5971161 | Branecky et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6481712 | Yap | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6902162 | Otto et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
20030080503 | Wright et al. | May 2003 | A1 |