1. Field
The present invention relates generally to detention facility cell door locks, and in particular to detention facility cell door locks with protective housings, and further, to such protective housings that are mounted on the exterior of the cell.
2. Description of the Problem and Related Art
Many detention facilities have cells that were originally provided with conventional swinging doors locked with a lock mounted in a door frame jamb and that fits within a 2″ wide face. Many of these locks have to be replaced due to inmate access to the lock bolt (tampering), fatigue and destructive physical abuse directly to the door and frame.
Conventional frame- and door-mounted cell lock mechanisms are subject to tampering because the thickness of a typical door frame and the relatively thin width of the door stop (typically about ⅝ of an inch) gives an inmate an opportunity to use a playing card, a credit card, a calling card, or something similar that is stiff but flexible, and small enough to be secretly carried, to block the lock bolt by inserting the object in the path of the lock bolt as the cell door is closing.
An inexpensive alternative to complete replacement of the door, frame and lock, and a common practice is to replace the lock and lock pocket by cutting away a large portion of the wall and frame and installing a new lock pocket with lock known as “recessed mounting.” This invasive method can compromise the structural integrity of the wall and door and involves extensive preparation for demolition and clean up after installation. The time to modify a door and frame in this manner means detention facility staff must closely coordinate the relocation and heightened supervision of inmates for prolonged periods.
Accordingly, a structure is needed that securely supports a lock mechanism for prison or jail cells that deters or inhibits tampering, but may be installed quickly, cheaply, and does not impair the structural integrity of the existing wall and door.
For purposes of summarizing the invention, certain aspects, advantages, and novel features of the invention have been described herein. It is to be understood that not necessarily all such advantages may be achieved in accordance with any one particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
A detention facility cell door lock housing assembly includes a lock mechanism housing to be mounted on the exterior surface of a cell wall adjacent the cell door opening and lock pocket housing correspondingly mounted on the exterior surface of the cell door. The lock mechanism housing includes a stepped side wall having at least a portion with an exterior facing surface to act as a stop. The lock pocket housing includes an opposingly stepped side wall, such that when the door is close the respective side walls fit together and the stop is engaged to prevent further door travel.
The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Additionally, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the drawing in which the reference number first appears.
The various embodiments of the present invention and their advantages are best understood by referring to
This invention may be provided in other specific forms and embodiments without departing from the essential characteristics as described herein. The embodiments described above are to be considered in all aspects as illustrative only and not restrictive in any manner. The appended claims rather than the description and drawings indicate the scope of the invention.
It can be seen that the two respective housings 201, 203 are shaped such that when the door 3 is closed the stop mating surface 221 of lock pocket housing 203 is seated against the stop 213 of the lock mechanism housing 201. Further, the housings 201, 203 are formed so that the shoulder portion 215 and the second rabbet portion 219 extend outward from the door frame 5 and door 3, respectively, and formed so that the stop 213 extends laterally offset vis-á-vis the door frame 5, i.e., away from the door frame edge. Moreover, respective opposing surfaces 215, 219 and 211, 217, are matingly stepped and dimensioned appropriately to provide a close engagement of the two housing components 201, 203, minimizing the gap between the two opposing surfaces.
The depth of the shoulder portion 215 should optimally be as great as possible while still accounting for space constraints to reduce the likelihood of an inmate inserting objects between the lock mechanism bolts 205, 207 and their respective openings 204, 202 in the lock pocket housing 203, e.g., a playing card, credit card, or other objects which may be stiff but flexible and prevent the lock bolt from engaging. The width of the stop 213 is also dimensioned to be as wide as possible. Preferably, the width of the stop 213 should be greater than that of the standard door stop 410 which is about ⅝ inch. Still more preferably, the width of the stop 213 is between about ⅞ inch to about one inch, or greater, including widths of about 15/16 inch. As with the extended depth of the shoulder portion 215, the wider stop 213 surface reduces the ability of an inmate to tamper with the lock function by interposing a stiff but flexible card.
Both housing components 201, 203 are preferably formed with sloping top and bottom surfaces. This feature provides enhanced protection of the locking mechanism from overhead impacts as well as a clean, modern appearance.
Various methods are known in the art for securely attaching similar structures to wall and door surfaces, and thus, the following description is merely provided for illustration, and should not be considered to be the sole technique for mounting of the lock housing assembly 10. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment, each mounting plate 301, 303 comprises a back plate 301a, 303a, in each of which may be defined a plurality of slots 302 that can provide access to the mounting surface for a welding torch, thus welding the mounting plate 301, 303 to the mounting surface. Of course, the plates may also be bolted to the wall or door, but this requires drilling holes in each structure which increases installation time.
Each mounting plate 301, 303 may include a plurality of attachment flanges 305 that extend perpendicularly, in either direction, from the back plate 301a, 303a, and may be configured with fastener openings to allow attachment of the housing 201, 203 to the mounting plate 301, 303. Additionally, the housing 201, 203, may include a back wall 311 and may be attached to each mounting plate 301, 303 with a plurality of suitable fasteners 309 through openings in each wall 311. Each housing 201, 203 also may include reinforcing ribs 307 and other structures for supporting and mounting of a locking mechanism.
An additional feature resides in the design of the lock pocket housing 203 in that it is hollow. Often, an inmate will stuff any kind of debris, such as paper scraps or candy or food wrappers, in the bolt hole in the door frame, which, if it is shallow enough, will fill in a relatively short amount of time and may prevent the lock bolt from fully engaging the bolt hole, compromising the security of the cell. A hollow lock pocket housing 203 deters this tactic as it would require a greater amount of debris and a longer period of time to full sufficiently to interfere with the lock bolt operation. In addition, the housing 203 may optionally be configured with an opening to allow periodic cleaning of the housing interior.
It will be appreciated that since the respective housings are surface-mounted to the existing door and frame, the structural integrity of the wall and frame are preserved. Further, installation time, and thus, down time is greatly reduced, which in turn, reduces disruption of the security routine, and temporary relocation of inmates during installation. Applicant has successfully tested prototypes of the above-described structures and installation method in accordance with ASTM F1450-05 standard methods for hollow metal swinging door assemblies for detention and correctional facilities.
As described above and shown in the associated drawings, the present invention comprises an apparatus for a detention facility cell door lock housing assembly. While particular embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be understood, however, that the invention is not limited thereto, since modifications may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings. It is, therefore, contemplated by the appended claims to cover any such modifications that incorporate those features or those improvements that embody the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1665243 | Whitehouse | Apr 1928 | A |
1723126 | Best | Aug 1929 | A |
1739897 | Garber | Dec 1929 | A |
1940639 | White | Dec 1933 | A |
2146552 | Ralston | Feb 1939 | A |
2170521 | Rodth | Aug 1939 | A |
2290114 | Metzler | Jul 1942 | A |
2397926 | Creech | Apr 1946 | A |
2417167 | Johnston | Mar 1947 | A |
3893723 | Boule | Jul 1975 | A |
4180287 | Youngblood et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4691542 | Young | Sep 1987 | A |
4887856 | Percoco et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4913475 | Bushnell et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5267461 | Eizen | Dec 1993 | A |
5299385 | McConnell | Apr 1994 | A |
5881585 | Kang | Mar 1999 | A |
6058746 | Mirshafiee et al. | May 2000 | A |
6282931 | Padiak et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293131 | Lemettinen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6374650 | Newman | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6581333 | Kimball | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6684570 | Robledo | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6826937 | Su | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7296448 | Shaw | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7707862 | Walls et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7836735 | Liu | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7874189 | Martin | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20020053165 | Secoolish et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20070240465 | Clifford et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20100269431 | Young | Oct 2010 | A1 |