Determination of effective composition of a mixture of hydrocarbon gases

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6997037
  • Patent Number
    6,997,037
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 12, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 14, 2006
    19 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for determining the effective composition of a mixture of gases including a plurality of hydrocarbon gases, the method comprising selecting one or more effective hydrocarbons to represent the plurality of hydrocarbon gases in the gas mixture, the number of effective hydrocarbons being less than the number of hydrocarbon gases in the gas mixture whose composition is to be determined; measuring a number of characteristics of the gas mixture whose effective composition is to be determined, the number of characteristics to be measured being one less than the total number of components to be determined and determining the effective composition of the mixture of gases from the measurements of the characteristics of the gas mixture, a predetermined parameter dependent upon the characteristic measured and knowing that the sum of the components of the gas mixture equals 100%.
Description

The present invention relates to the determination of an effective composition of a mixture of hydrocarbon gases such as natural gas. The effective composition can be used to determine a quantity indicative of the quality of the gas such as its calorific value, relative density and Wobbe index.


Conventionally to determine the quality of a gas mixture such as its calorific value one could determine the proportion of each of the gases in the mixture and calculate the calorific value. However, for a mixture of several gases such as natural gas it is difficult to determine the proportion of each and every gas.


According to a first aspect of the present invention a method of determining an effective composition of a mixture of hydrocarbon gases comprises representing a mixture of hydrocarbon gases by an effective mixture of fewer hydrocarbon gases and determining the effective proportion of each of the hydrocarbon gases in the effective mixture.


The effective proportions of each of the hydrocarbon gases in the effective mixture is preferably used to determine a parameter indicative of the quality of the gas such as calorific value(CV), relative density (RD) or Wobbe index(WI).





An example of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 shows CV determined in accordance with the present invention compared to actual values;



FIG. 2 shows RD determined in accordance with the present invention compared to actual values; and



FIG. 3 shows an apparatus for performing the invention.





It has been found that a mixture of hydrocarbon gases such as natural gas can be represented by a reduced number of components. For example the many hydrocarbons in a natural gas can be represented by one or an effective mixture of two or more hydrocarbons. In the following example the hydrocarbons in a natural gas are represented by a mixture of effective methane (CH4) and propane (C3H8). The proportions of the individual components of the effective gas are selected to produce the same major properties as the gas itself. The effective gas for the other hydrocarbons is the volume of propane and methane that has the same ideal volume and the same average number of carbon atoms per molecule as the gas under consideration. For example, consider ethane:

2C2H6=C3H8+CH4

Ethane is represented in the effective gas by half its volume of propane and half its volume of methane. The effective factors for ethane in terms of propane and of methane are therefore, 0.5 and 0.5. Other hydrocarbons can be represented in these terms and their effective factors are tabulated below:
















Effective












Hydrocarbon
CH4
C3H8















Methane
1.0




Ethane
0.5
0.5



Propane

1.0



Butane
−0.5
1.5



Pentane
−1.0
2.0



Hexane
−1.5
2.5










Natural gas generally also contains CO2 and N2 and so, assuming that the hydrocarbons are represented by an effective mix of methane and propane, the natural gas can be represented by a four component mixture of methane, propane, CO2 and N2. If the hydrocarbons are represented by just one hydrocarbon then the natural gas could be represented by an effective three component mix of the effective hydrocarbon, CO2 and N2.


An example is given below of a natural gas represented as an effective four component mixture of methane, propane, CO2 and N2. The actual composition of a sample of natural gas identified as bottle 2912 is as follows:






















CH4
C2H6
C3H8
N—C4H10
I—C4H10
N—C5H12
CO2
N2
CV


Bottle ID
% mol
% mol
% mol
% mol
% mol
% mol
% mol
% mol
MJ/m3







2912
94.451
3.11
0.512
0.109
0.089
0.170
0.647
0.912
38.73









Applying effective methane and propane calculations to the hydrocarbon samples of the above natural gas sample gives the following result:


















Hydrocarbon


CH4


C3H8





















Methane
1.0
94.451
94.451

94.451
0


Ethane
0.5
3.110
1.555
0.5
3.110
1.555


Propane

0.512
0
1.0
0.512
0.512


Butane
−0.5
0.198
−0.099
1.5
0.198
0.297


Pentane
−1.0
0.170
−0.170
2.0
0.170
0.340


Hexane
−1.5
0
0
2.5
0
0




CH4′ =
95.737

C3H8′ =
2.704









Thus the hydrocarbons of the natural gas sample can be represented by an effective mixture of 95.737% methane and 2.704% propane. The CO2 and N2 samples can be included to provide the four component effective natural gas mixtures:


















CH4
C3H8
CO2
N2
Σ


Bottle ID
% mol
% mol
% mol
% mol
% mol







2912
95.737
2.704
0.647
0.912
100









A Method has been found to determine the effective methane, propane, CO2 and N2 proportions in a sample of natural gas. It is known that the sum of the four components equals 100%. By making three measurements of the characteristics of the natural gas and knowing that the sum of the four components equals 100% the relative effective proportions of methane, propane, CO2 and N2 can be determined using simultaneous equations as shown below:

X=C1.CH4+C2.C3H8+C3.CO2+C4.N2
Y=C5.CH4+C6.C3H8+C7.CO2+C8.N2
Z=C9.CH4+C10. C3H8+C11.CO2+C12. N2
100=CH4%+C3H8%+CO2%+N2%


X, Y and Z are measurements taken of the sample of gas being investigated. In this case X is the thermal conductivity of the gas at a first temperature (THCst), Y is the thermal conductivity of the gas at a second temperature (ThCr) and Z is the speed of sound in the gas (SOS). The thermal conductivities of the gas at the two temperatures and the speed of sound of the gas are measured using any suitable technique as is well known in the art. Any convenient characteristics of the gas may be measured and used as X,Y or Z. The parameters C1 to C12 are constant for a particular measurement apparatus, and a particular temperature and pressure and the particular characteristic being measured. The values for C1 to C12 may be found by calibrating a particular apparatus using a gas of known effective methane, effective propane, CO2 and N2 proportions.


To determine the coefficients C1 to C12 at a fixed temperature and pressure, a set of data is determined which maps values of X, Y and Z for the expected range in gas composition. Regression analysis is then used with the gas components as the X input range and parameter X as the Y input range, the resulting analysis gives C1 to C4 at this temperature and pressure. This process is repeated with parameter Y as the Y input to give C5 to C8 and again with parameter Z as the Y input to give C9 to C12. This gives C1 and C12 at a fixed temperature and pressure.


These coefficients are temperature and pressure dependent. So the whole process needs to be repeated for a range of temperatures and pressures covering the specified operating range. Once this is complete a mathematical model can be determined to predict C1 to C12 at any temperature and pressure in the specified range.


The effective proportions of methane, propane, CO2 and N2 may be determined from the measured gas characteristics (in this example two thermal conductivities at different temperatures and the speed of sound) using a matrix method as shown below:
(C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C121111)-1(ThCstThCrSOS100)=(CH4C3H8CO2N2)

Once the effective proportions of methane, ethane, CO2 and nitrogen and are known, these can be used to determine the calorific value (CV), relative density (RD) and Wobbe Index (WI) as explained below.


The ideal gas superior calorific value (water vapour condensed) on a volumetric basis, for a combustion temperature t1, of a mixture of known composition metered at a temperature t2 and pressure p2, can be calculated using:
H~so[t1·V(t2,p2)]=J=1Nxj·H~jo[t1·V(t2,p2)]

Where:

  • {tilde over (H)}os [t1.V(t2,p2)] is the ideal superior caloric value on a volumetric basis of the mixture.
  • Xj if the mole fraction of component j determined from the earlier effective constituent analysis.
  • {tilde over (H)}oj[t1,V(t2,p2)] is the ideal superior calorific value on a volumetric basis of component j.


In the UK, Metric Standard Conditions (MSC) are preferred:

    • P2 is 101.325 kPa (1.01325 bar A)
    • t1=t2=15° C. (288.15K)


Calorific Values for methane and propane at metric standard conditions are known:
















Component
{tilde over (H)}oj [15, V (15, 101.325)}









CH4
37.706



C3H8
93.940











Multiplying these values by the proportions of methane and propane determined earlier provides a value for

{tilde over (H)}os[t1,V(t2,p2)]


The real-gas caloric value on a volumetric basis is calculated from the equation:
H~s[t1·V(t2,p2)]=Hso[t1,V(t2,p2)]Zmix(t2,p2)

Where:

  • {tilde over (H)}s [t1.V(t2,p2)] is the real-gas superior calorific value on a volumetric basis.


The compression factor Zmix at the metering conditions is calculated using:
Zmix(t2,p2)=1-[J=1NXj·bj·]2

Where

  • √bj is the so-called summation factor which for methane is 0.0447 and for propane is 0.1338.



FIG. 1 shows the CV determined as above using the effective composition plotted on the y-axis and the actual CV along the x-axis.


The CV calculated for the effective composition is within +/−0.008 MJ/m3 (2 standard deviations) of the actual CV along the x-axis.


The relative density (RD) of a gas is calculated using the following:
do=J=1NXj·MjMair

Where:

  • do is the relative density of the ideal gas
  • Mj is the molar mass of component j
  • Mair is the molar mass of dry air of standard composition (28.9626 kg.kmol−1)


The relative density of the real gas is calculated from:
d(t,p)=do·Zair(t,p)Zmix(t,p)

Where:

  • d(t,p) is the relative density of the real gas
  • Zair (t,p) is the compression factor of dry air of standard composition (MSC=0.99958)


The compression factor Zmix at the metering conditions is calculated using;
Zmix(t,p)=1-[J=1NXj·[bj]2

Where:

  • √bj is the so-called summation factor which for methane is 0.0447 and for propane is 0.1338.



FIG. 2 shows the relative density determined assuming an effective composition of methane, propane, CO2 and N2 for various gas samples plotted on the y-axis and the actual relative density of those gas samples plotted on the x-axis.


The relative density calculated for the effective composition is within +/−0.00001 (2 standard deviations) of the actual values.


The Wobbe Index (WI) of a gas may be determined from the CV and RD calculated above using the equation:
WI=CVRD

The effective composition concept can be used with other standard methods to calculate such properties as compressibility, density, etc.


The invention may be performed by an apparatus using an appropriate number of sensors or detectors, in this case a thermal conductivity detector arranged to measure the thermal conductivity of a gas at two temperatures and a speed of sound detector; and a control means to perform the appropriate processing which could be a computer for example. Such an apparatus is shown in FIG. 3. A fluid in this case, natural gas, is supplied in a conduit 1. A thermal conductivity sensor 2 having means to measure the thermal conductivity of the natural gas at two different temperatures is provided in the conduit. A device 3 to measure the speed of sound of the natural gas is also provided. The thermal conductivity sensor 2 and the speed of sound sensor 3 are both connected to a control means 4, in this case a computer to receive signals indicative of the thermal conductivity of the passing natural gas at two different temperatures and the speed of sound of the passing natural gas to determine the effective composition of the passing natural gas. The control means 4 may also use the determined effective composition to calculate a quantity indicative of the quality of the gas.


The method of the invention may be provided on a digital storage media such as a CD-ROM for installation on a suitable apparatus such as a computer connected to appropriate sensors on detectors.

Claims
  • 1. A method for determining the effective composition of a gas mixture which contains a plurality of hydrocarbon gases, comprising: selecting one or more effective hydrocarbons to represent the plurality of hydrocarbon gases in the gas mixture, the number of effective hydrocarbons being less than the number of hydrocarbon gases in the gas mixture whose composition is to be determined;measuring a number of characteristics of the gas mixture whose effective composition is to be determined, wherein the number of characteristics to be measured is one less than the total number of components to be determined anddetermining the effective composition of the mixture of gases from (a) the measurements of the characteristics of the gas mixture, (b) a predetermined parameter dependent upon the characteristic measured, and (c) knowing that the sum of the components of the gas mixture equals 100%,wherein said gas mixture includes carbon dioxide and nitrogen in addition to a plurality of hydrocarbon gases andwherein the gas characteristics that are measured are thermal conductivity at a first temperature, thermal conductivity at a second temperature and the speed of sound in the gas.
  • 2. A method for determining the proportion of different gases in a gas mixture which contains a plurality of hydrocarbon gases, comprising: selecting one effective hydrocarbon or two or more effective hydrocarbons to represent the plurality of hydrocarbon gases in the gas mixture, wherein the number of effective hydrocarbon(s) is fewer than the number of hydrocarbon gases in the gas mixture whose composition is to be determined thus representing said gas mixture as a mixture of the effective hydrocarbon gas(es) and any non-hydrocarbon gas components;measuring at least one characteristic of the effective gas mixture, wherein the number of different characteristics measured is one fewer than that number of components in the effective gas mixture; and determining the proportion of gases in the effective gas mixture from (a) the measurements of the characteristics of the effective gas mixture, (b) a predetermined parameter dependent upon the characteristic(s) measured, and (c) knowing that the sum of the components of the effective gas mixture equals 100%.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the hydrocarbon gases in the gas mixture are represented by an effective gas mixture of methane or propane, or methane and propane.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the gas mixture contains a plurality of hydrocarbon gases, carbon dioxide and nitrogen.
  • 5. The method of claim 2, wherein the amount of a hydrocarbon gas in said hydrocarbon gas mixture is represented by an effective amount of methane, propane, or methane and propane determined from the table below: Effective amountEffective amountHydrocarbon gasof methaneof propaneMethane1.0Ethane0.50.5Propane1.0Butane+31 0.51.5Pentane+31 1.02.0Hexane+31 1.52.5
  • 6. The method of claim 2, wherein the gas mixture contains a plurality of hydrocarbon gases represented by an effective gas mixture of methane and propane, nitrogen and carbon dioxide, and wherein three different characteristics of the gas mixture are measured to determine the proportions of the four different gas components of the effective gas mixture which are carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and the two effective gas components methane and propane.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the three different characteristics of the gas mixture which are measured are thermal conductivity at a first temperature, thermal conductivity at a second temperature, and the speed of sound in the natural gas mixture.
  • 8. The method of claim 2, further comprising determining the calorific value from the effective proportions of gases in the gas mixture.
  • 9. The method of claim 2, further comprising determining the relative density from the effective proportions of gases in the gas mixture.
  • 10. The method of claim 2, further comprising determining the Wobbe index from the effective proportions of gases in the gas mixture.
  • 11. A method for determining the proportion of different gases in a gas mixture which contains N different hydrocarbon gases, wherein N≧2 comprising: selecting Neffective hydrocarbon(s) to represent the N different hydrocarbons in said gas mixture, wherein Neffective<N, thus representing the N different hydrocarbon gases in said gas mixture as a less complex mixture of Neffective hydrocarbon gases;measuring Neffective−1 characteristics of the gas mixture;determining the proportion of effective gases in the gas mixture from (a) the measurements of the characteristics of the effective gas mixture, (b) a predetermined parameter dependent upon the characteristic(s) measured, and (c) knowing that the sum of the effective hydrocarbon gas components and any non-hydrocarbon gases in the gas mixture equals 100%.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein Neffective=1.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein Neffective=2.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, wherein Neffective=2 and the two effective gases are methane and propane.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein Neffective=2 and at least one of the effective gases is a gas other than methane or propane.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the effective gas mixture has four effective components: the two effective gases, carbon dioxide and nitrogen.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, wherein measuring Neffective−1 characteristics of the gas mixture comprises at least one measurement selected from the group consisting of the thermal conductivity of the gas at a first temperature, the thermal conductivity of a gas a second temperature, and the speed of sound in the gas.
  • 18. The method of claim 11, further comprising determining the calorific value, relative density or Wobbe index from the effective proportions of gases in the gas mixture.
  • 19. An apparatus for determining the effective composition of a mixture of gases including a plurality of hydrocarbon gases, the apparatus comprising: control means for selecting one or more effective hydrocarbon component(s) to represent the plurality of hydrocarbon gases in the gas mixture, the number of effective hydrocarbons being less than the number of hydrocarbon gases in the gas mixture whose composition is to be determined;measuring means for measuring a number of characteristics of the gas mixture whose effective composition is to be determined, the number of characteristics to be measured by the measuring means being one less than the total number of components to be determined and determining the effective composition of the mixture of gases from the measurements of the characteristics of the gas mixture, a predetermined parameter dependent upon the characteristic measured and knowing that the sum of the components of the gas mixture equals 100%.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein said effective gas mixture comprises at least two effective hydrocarbon gases, carbon dioxide and nitrogen.
  • 21. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein said measuring means comprise means for measuring at least one characteristic of the gas mixture selected from the group consisting of thermal conductivity at a first temperature, thermal conductivity at a second temperature, and the speed of sound in the gas mixture.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
0027875 Nov 2000 GB national
0112924 May 2001 GB national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/GB01/04992 11/12/2001 WO 00 8/16/2004
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO02/40992 5/23/2002 WO A
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number Name Date Kind
4520654 Terhune Jun 1985 A
4555931 Amimoto et al. Dec 1985 A
5272907 Hakala Dec 1993 A
5569838 Broedel et al. Oct 1996 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
2 210 977 Jun 1989 GB
2 312 508 Oct 1997 GB
2 333 370 Jul 1999 GB
2 333 371 Jul 1999 GB
00 19176 Apr 2000 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040261497 A1 Dec 2004 US