The present invention relates to the determination of an effective composition of a mixture of hydrocarbon gases such as natural gas. The effective composition can be used to determine a quantity indicative of the quality of the gas such as its calorific value, relative density and Wobbe index.
Conventionally to determine the quality of a gas mixture such as its calorific value one could determine the proportion of each of the gases in the mixture and calculate the calorific value. However, for a mixture of several gases such as natural gas it is difficult to determine the proportion of each and every gas.
According to a first aspect of the present invention a method of determining an effective composition of a mixture of hydrocarbon gases comprises representing a mixture of hydrocarbon gases by an effective mixture of fewer hydrocarbon gases and determining the effective proportion of each of the hydrocarbon gases in the effective mixture.
The effective proportions of each of the hydrocarbon gases in the effective mixture is preferably used to determine a parameter indicative of the quality of the gas such as calorific value(CV), relative density (RD) or Wobbe index(WI).
An example of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
It has been found that a mixture of hydrocarbon gases such as natural gas can be represented by a reduced number of components. For example the many hydrocarbons in a natural gas can be represented by one or an effective mixture of two or more hydrocarbons. In the following example the hydrocarbons in a natural gas are represented by a mixture of effective methane (CH4) and propane (C3H8). The proportions of the individual components of the effective gas are selected to produce the same major properties as the gas itself. The effective gas for the other hydrocarbons is the volume of propane and methane that has the same ideal volume and the same average number of carbon atoms per molecule as the gas under consideration. For example, consider ethane:
2C2H6=C3H8+CH4
Ethane is represented in the effective gas by half its volume of propane and half its volume of methane. The effective factors for ethane in terms of propane and of methane are therefore, 0.5 and 0.5. Other hydrocarbons can be represented in these terms and their effective factors are tabulated below:
Natural gas generally also contains CO2 and N2 and so, assuming that the hydrocarbons are represented by an effective mix of methane and propane, the natural gas can be represented by a four component mixture of methane, propane, CO2 and N2. If the hydrocarbons are represented by just one hydrocarbon then the natural gas could be represented by an effective three component mix of the effective hydrocarbon, CO2 and N2.
An example is given below of a natural gas represented as an effective four component mixture of methane, propane, CO2 and N2. The actual composition of a sample of natural gas identified as bottle 2912 is as follows:
Applying effective methane and propane calculations to the hydrocarbon samples of the above natural gas sample gives the following result:
Thus the hydrocarbons of the natural gas sample can be represented by an effective mixture of 95.737% methane and 2.704% propane. The CO2 and N2 samples can be included to provide the four component effective natural gas mixtures:
A Method has been found to determine the effective methane, propane, CO2 and N2 proportions in a sample of natural gas. It is known that the sum of the four components equals 100%. By making three measurements of the characteristics of the natural gas and knowing that the sum of the four components equals 100% the relative effective proportions of methane, propane, CO2 and N2 can be determined using simultaneous equations as shown below:
X=C1.CH4+C2.C3H8+C3.CO2+C4.N2
Y=C5.CH4+C6.C3H8+C7.CO2+C8.N2
Z=C9.CH4+C10. C3H8+C11.CO2+C12. N2
100=CH4%+C3H8%+CO2%+N2%
X, Y and Z are measurements taken of the sample of gas being investigated. In this case X is the thermal conductivity of the gas at a first temperature (THCst), Y is the thermal conductivity of the gas at a second temperature (ThCr) and Z is the speed of sound in the gas (SOS). The thermal conductivities of the gas at the two temperatures and the speed of sound of the gas are measured using any suitable technique as is well known in the art. Any convenient characteristics of the gas may be measured and used as X,Y or Z. The parameters C1 to C12 are constant for a particular measurement apparatus, and a particular temperature and pressure and the particular characteristic being measured. The values for C1 to C12 may be found by calibrating a particular apparatus using a gas of known effective methane, effective propane, CO2 and N2 proportions.
To determine the coefficients C1 to C12 at a fixed temperature and pressure, a set of data is determined which maps values of X, Y and Z for the expected range in gas composition. Regression analysis is then used with the gas components as the X input range and parameter X as the Y input range, the resulting analysis gives C1 to C4 at this temperature and pressure. This process is repeated with parameter Y as the Y input to give C5 to C8 and again with parameter Z as the Y input to give C9 to C12. This gives C1 and C12 at a fixed temperature and pressure.
These coefficients are temperature and pressure dependent. So the whole process needs to be repeated for a range of temperatures and pressures covering the specified operating range. Once this is complete a mathematical model can be determined to predict C1 to C12 at any temperature and pressure in the specified range.
The effective proportions of methane, propane, CO2 and N2 may be determined from the measured gas characteristics (in this example two thermal conductivities at different temperatures and the speed of sound) using a matrix method as shown below:
Once the effective proportions of methane, ethane, CO2 and nitrogen and are known, these can be used to determine the calorific value (CV), relative density (RD) and Wobbe Index (WI) as explained below.
The ideal gas superior calorific value (water vapour condensed) on a volumetric basis, for a combustion temperature t1, of a mixture of known composition metered at a temperature t2 and pressure p2, can be calculated using:
Where:
In the UK, Metric Standard Conditions (MSC) are preferred:
Calorific Values for methane and propane at metric standard conditions are known:
Multiplying these values by the proportions of methane and propane determined earlier provides a value for
{tilde over (H)}os[t1,V(t2,p2)]
The real-gas caloric value on a volumetric basis is calculated from the equation:
Where:
The compression factor Zmix at the metering conditions is calculated using:
Where
The CV calculated for the effective composition is within +/−0.008 MJ/m3 (2 standard deviations) of the actual CV along the x-axis.
The relative density (RD) of a gas is calculated using the following:
Where:
The relative density of the real gas is calculated from:
Where:
The compression factor Zmix at the metering conditions is calculated using;
Where:
The relative density calculated for the effective composition is within +/−0.00001 (2 standard deviations) of the actual values.
The Wobbe Index (WI) of a gas may be determined from the CV and RD calculated above using the equation:
The effective composition concept can be used with other standard methods to calculate such properties as compressibility, density, etc.
The invention may be performed by an apparatus using an appropriate number of sensors or detectors, in this case a thermal conductivity detector arranged to measure the thermal conductivity of a gas at two temperatures and a speed of sound detector; and a control means to perform the appropriate processing which could be a computer for example. Such an apparatus is shown in
The method of the invention may be provided on a digital storage media such as a CD-ROM for installation on a suitable apparatus such as a computer connected to appropriate sensors on detectors.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0027875 | Nov 2000 | GB | national |
0112924 | May 2001 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB01/04992 | 11/12/2001 | WO | 00 | 8/16/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/40992 | 5/23/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4520654 | Terhune | Jun 1985 | A |
4555931 | Amimoto et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
5272907 | Hakala | Dec 1993 | A |
5569838 | Broedel et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 210 977 | Jun 1989 | GB |
2 312 508 | Oct 1997 | GB |
2 333 370 | Jul 1999 | GB |
2 333 371 | Jul 1999 | GB |
00 19176 | Apr 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040261497 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |