The present application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/960,140, filed Dec. 3, 2010, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/959,862, filed Dec. 3, 2010, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/959,819, filed Dec. 3, 2010 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,194,973), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/959,764, filed Dec. 3, 2010 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,103,736), and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/959,781, filed Dec. 3, 2010, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
1. Field of the Disclosure
The present application is related to methods for determining deformations on a tubular in a wellbore.
2. Description of the Related Art
Tubulars are used in many stages of oil exploration and production, such as drilling operations, well completions and wireline logging operations. These tubulars often encounter a large amount of stress, due to compaction, fault movement or subsidence, for example, which can lead to tubular damage or even to well failure. Well failures significantly impact both revenue generation and operation costs for oil and gas production companies, often resulting in millions of dollars lost in repairing and replacing the wells. Therefore, it is desirable to monitor wells to provide accurate, detailed information of their experienced stresses in order to understand the mechanisms of tubular failures.
Determining the deformation of a tubular under different stress distributions can be very complicated. In many cases, due to the unknown internal and external forces involved, it is not realistic to use pre-developed geometric models to simulate a deformation. There is therefore a need to obtain geometrical information of tubular stress from in-situ measurements.
In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method of determining a strain component for a deformation mode of a member, the method including: obtaining a plurality of measurements, each of the plurality of measurements related to a strain at a location of the member; selecting the deformation mode; and applying an adjustable filter to the plurality of strain measurements to determine the strain component for the selected deformation mode.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides an apparatus for determining a strain component for a deformation mode of a member, the apparatus including a plurality of sensors, each sensor of the plurality of sensors configured to obtain a measurement of related to a strain at the member; and a processor configured to select a deformation mode and apply an adjustable filter to the plurality of strain measurements to determine the strain component for the selected deformation mode.
In yet another aspect, the present disclosure provides a computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions that when read by a processor enable the processor to perform a method, the method comprising: obtaining strain measurements at a plurality of sensors, each of the plurality of measurements related to a strain at a location of the member; selecting the deformation mode; and applying an adjustable filter to the plurality of strain measurements to determine the strain component for the selected deformation mode.
Examples of certain features of the apparatus and method disclosed herein are summarized rather broadly in order that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood. There are, of course, additional features of the apparatus and method disclosed hereinafter that will form the subject of the claims.
The present disclosure is best understood with reference to the accompanying figures in which like numerals refer to like elements and in which:
In the exemplary embodiment of
For the exemplary methods disclosed herein, each sensor or FBG is assigned a number (grating number) indicating its position along the optical fiber. An end of the fiber optic cable is coupled to an interrogation unit 108 typically at a surface location that in one aspect obtains a measurement from each of the FBGs to determine a wavelength shift or strain at each of the FBGs. In general, the interrogation unit 108 reads the plurality of gratings simultaneously using, for example, frequency divisional multiplexing. Interrogation unit 108 is coupled to a data processing unit 110 and in one aspect transmits the measured wavelength shifts to the data processing unit. In one aspect, the data processing unit 110 receives and processes the measured wavelength shifts from the interrogation unit 108 to obtain a result, such as a three-dimensional image of a tubular deformation, using the methods disclosed herein. A typical data processing unit 110 includes a computer or processor 113, at least one memory 115 for storing programs and data, and a recording medium 117 for recording and storing data and results obtained using the exemplary methods disclosed herein. The data processing unit 110 may output the result to various devices, such as a display 112, a suitable recording medium 117, the tubular 102, reservoir modeling applications or a control system affecting the strains.
λB=2nD Eq. (1)
where λB is the wavelength of the reflected light and is known as the Bragg wavelength, n is an effective refractive index of the grating, and D is the grating period. The FBG is typically transparent at other wavelengths of light.
Returning to
Δλ=λB0(1−Pe)Kεf Eq. (2)
where λB0 is the Bragg wavelength of the unstrained (relaxed) grating, Pe is the strain effect on the refractive index, and K is a bonding coefficient. Using typical parameters of λB0˜1552 nm, Pe˜0.22 and K˜0.9 results in about 900 micro strain for each 1 nm shift. Eq. (2) can be rearranged as such:
so that strain calculations on the tubular can be obtained from Δλ measurements. When considered as a whole the strains determined from the plurality of optical sensors can be used to determine deformations over the entire tubular as well as determining various modes of deformation which are discussed below.
A tubular undergoing a general deformation experiences one or more deformation modes. Exemplary deformation modes include compression/extension, bending, ovalization, triangularization, and rectangularization modes. Each deformation mode, in turn, has an associated spatial frequency related to the strains obtained at the plurality of FBGs and which can be seen by creating a dataset such as by graphing the wavelength shifts Δλ obtained at the plurality of FBGs against the grating numbers of the FBGs, as seen for example in
The compression/extension deformation mode occurs when a tubular experiences a compressive or tensile force applied in the axial direction. Such a force affects both the tubular axis and the circumference of the tubular. For example, as the tubular is shortened along the axial direction under a compressive force, the circumference expands outward to accommodate. As the tubular is lengthened along the axial direction under a tensile force, the circumference constricts inward to accommodate. The strain for this deformation mode is generally uniformly distributed along the surface in either the axial or orthogonal (circumferential) direction. The distribution may also depend on tubular geometry tubular condition and magnitude of strain. The strain in the axial direction is referred to as the principal strain. The strain in the orthogonal direction is referred to as the secondary strain and has a value proportional to the principal strain as described by:
εsecondary=vεprincipal Eq. (4)
where v is the Poisson's ratio, which is an inherent property of the material. Since the strain for a compression or tensile force is uniformly distributed over the tubular, FBGs located at all locations on the tubular tend to experience the same corresponding wavelength shift.
The bending mode of deformation, shown in
εtranse=vεbending Eq. (5)
The other deformation modes (i.e., ovalization, rectangularization and triangularization) are referred to as cross-sectional deformations since they lead to changes in the shape of the cross-section. These deformation modes are shown in
εaxis=−vεoval Eq. (6)
In a graph of Δλ vs. grating number, an ovalization mode forms a sinusoidal wave with a frequency that is double the characteristic frequency of the bending deformation.
Given these deformation modes and their related strains, the total strain at a given point of the tubular is a result of the combination of the strains from the deformation modes. The overall strain is given in Eq. (7):
where εc, εb, εo, εt and εr represent respectively the strains for compression/extension, bending, ovalization triangularization and rectangularization, αT is the linear thermal expansion coefficient of the tubular material, θ is the wrapping angle of the fiber which thereby indicates a particular location on the tubular, and v is the Poisson's ratio. For steels, αT=31.5 μS/° C. Since the sensing fiber can be permanently damaged if it experiences a strain exceeding 1-2%, it is possible to expand the radical term of Eq. (7) and ignore higher level terms to obtain:
As seen in Eq. (8), for small strains, the strain contributions from different deformation modes are additive.
As discussed above, each deformation mode of tubular 102 is apparent on a graph of wavelength shift at each FBG against the FBG grating number. An exemplary graph of wavelength shift vs. grating number is shown in
A filter may be applied to the frequency spectrum of
where s is the complex frequency and sc is the cutoff frequency. The parameter n defines an attenuation of the frequency or, in other words, a degree of the overlap between neighboring modes, and k is an index for selecting the deformation mode defined as
The exemplary band-pass filter of Eq. (9) is characterized by 100% gain in the center area of each band with no “ripple” effect; maximally flat (or minimal loss) in the pass band; smoothed channel output allowing direct numerical calculation of first derivatives; ability to perform a filtering with introducing phase shift; and adjustability for data collected from various sensing fibers having different wrap angles.
The bandpass filter is applied to select a peak.
In an alternate embodiment, a bandpass filter that correlates in the spatial domain to the exemplary filter of the spectral domain described above may be applied. The domain in which the filter is applied may be selected to reduce computation expense, for example. The corresponding transfer function H(s,k) in the spatial domain to the bandpass filter of Eq. (9) can be derived from the equation
G2(s,k)=H(s,k)H(−s,k) Eq. (11)
to construct a digital filter with no phase shift used the following condition:
H(s,k)=H(−s,k) Eq. (12)
thereby leading to the following transfer function in real space:
where j is the frequency represented by the point index in the DFFT spectrum, jc is the cutoff frequency, M is a total number of measurements and N is a total number of sensors in a single wrap of the member, also referred to herein as the wrap number of the grating fiber.
In one embodiment, a bending calibration may be performed. Under an applied bending force, the tubular bends along a known azimuth deformation angle over the entire tubular. Obtaining bending data provides information on average number of gratings in each wrap and identification of the grating in each individual wrap. In addition, one may visually correct data using a calibrated 2D strain map of the bending data, such as shown in
The location of a grating on the tubular is determined by wrap angle, the outer-diameter of the tubular and inter-grating spacing. Systematic errors in any of these are accumulative, such that an error on the location of a particular grating contributes to errors on all subsequent gratings. For an exemplary wrapped fiber having total 400 Bragg gratings and with 40 gratings in each wrap, the error on azimuth angle for the last wrap may be as big as 36°, even if the systematic error is only 1%. To meaningfully determine the azimuth angle, the location of the fiber on the tubular is allocated according to the exemplary methods described herein.
In one embodiment, two steps are used in order to determine a tubular location from the fiber location. In a first step, corrections are made for inaccuracies in tubular diameter or wrap angle using, for instance, the exemplary calibration methods described above. If (x0, x1, . . . , xN) are respectively the measured fiber locations in the sensing fiber, each grating space measured is multiplied by a factor k that is determined either from a heating string correction data or is obtained by taking k as adjustable parameter to align bending correction strain. This therefore maps the fiber location (x0, x1, . . . , xN) to an intermediate calculated location (x′0, x′1, . . . , x′N).
A second step is to map the data to corrected locations onto the tubular surface location as shown in the exemplary insertion method of
The strain of a gridding point can be calculated from the values of the neighboring grating points by using an exemplary linear interpolation method of Eq. (16).
εi,j=└jεi+j,0+(N−j)εi+j−N,0┘/N Eq. (16)
where N is the number of gratings in each wrap. For simplicity, the two nearest grating points in the same column may be used to calculate a strain at a gridding point. Using the example of Eq. (16) to gridding point (3,2) of
Once the deformation modes are separated as described using the exemplary methods described herein and strains are mapped to a tubular surface, the strains can be applied in iterative processes to yield in one aspect a geometrical data for the bending mode of the tubular and in another aspect geometrical data for the cross-sectional deformations of the tubular. The obtained geometrical data can be used to obtain a three-dimensional image of the tubular which can be useful in determining a wear or condition of the tubular.
A method of determining geometrical data for the bending deformation mode is now discussed.
where r and φ are position coordinates of the tubular and φ1 is the bending azimuthal angle. Thus the bending strain such as obtained in
An exemplary numerical process for obtaining geometrical data from the deformation parameters Ra and φ1 is now discussed. In the numerical process, bending strain can be represented by a two-dimensional vector {right arrow over (ε)}b lying within a cross-section perpendicular to the axis of the tubular such as the cross-section of
Eqs. (17)-(19) can be combined to obtain the following equations:
Various methods are known for calculating
the first derivative of the bending strain with respect to the azimuth angle. From Eq. (20), once εb and
are known, the values of the strain components {right arrow over (ε)}bx and {right arrow over (ε)}by can then be calculated. The bending parameters Rx and Ry, which are x and y components of Ra, may then be calculated from Eq. (19) and (20). Rx and Ry are related to the axial bending variable by:
where z is the axial coordinate of the tubular. Once Rx and Ry are known, one can numerically solve Eqs. (21) to obtain geometrical data for bending.
In one aspect, the axial bending deformation can be calculated by numerically solving the Eqs. (21) using selected boundary conditions for the tubular. The most commonly applied boundary conditions are:
zx′(z=0)=zy′(z=0)=0
x(z=0)=x(z=l)=0
y(z=0)=y(z=l)=0 Eqs. (22)
where z=0 and z=l are the z coordinates of the end points of the axis of the tubular. Eqs. (22) holds true if the bending occurs only in the sensing section and the casing is significantly longer than the sensing section. Using the mathematical groundwork of Eqs. (17)-(22), the iterative process for obtaining geometrical data for the bending deformation is discussed below in reference to Eqs. (23)-(27).
Referring to
wherein d is the spacing between gratings and θ is the wrapping angle of the fiber optic cable. The position of the i+1th grating is therefore determined by:
x(i+1)=x(i)+x′z(i+1)*dz
y(i+1)=y(i)+y′z(i+1)*dz Eqs. (25)
Thus, in one aspect, the numerical solution begins with a first point such as x(0), y(0), z(0), in which its position and first derivatives are known from the boundary conditions and uses Eqs. (23)-(25) to obtain x(N), y(N), z(N) through N iterations. The coordinates of the Nth grating is compared with the boundary conditions. If the difference between them is greater than a selected criterion, the initial guess on the boundary condition derivatives of the first point is modified using Eqs. (26):
x′z(0)=x′z(0)+(x(N)−xN)*2/N
y′z(0)=y′z(0)+(y(N)−yN)*2/N Eqs. (26)
where (xN, yN) is the position of the last point as given by the boundary conditions and (x(N), y(N)) is the position of the Nth grating from the numerical process. The numerical process is then repeated until the difference between the calculated position and the position given in the boundary conditions for the Nth grating is within a preselected criterion, such as the criterion of Eqs. (27):
|x(N)−xN|<σallowed
|y(N)−yN|<σallowed Eqs. (27)
The geometrical information for the bending deformation is obtained once the criteria of Eqs. (27) are met.
An exemplary method for obtaining geometrical information from cross-sectional deformation parameters is now discussed with respect to
where ε(O,T,C) denotes a summation of all the three strain components (ovalization, triangularization, rectangularization), r is the original (undeformed) radius of the tubular and T is the thickness of the wall of the tubular. As long as enough data points are available, one can determine the shape of a closed curve of fixed length that represents the contour of the cross-section from the radius of curvature in two-dimensional space. Typically, polar coordinates are used in this process. In a polar coordinate system, for any curve in 2D space, the radius of the curvature can be calculated as:
where u′θ and u″θθ are respectively the first and second derivative of the logarithm of r over the azimuth angle (u=ln r). Within a limited degree of deformation, u′θ is much less than 1. Therefore, Eq. (29) can be further simplified to:
which can be rewritten in the form of a normal differential equation as:
Rcu″θθ+(3/2r−Rc)u′θ+(r−Rc)=0 Eq. (31)
The boundary conditions for Eq. (31) are:
r(θ=0)=r(θ=2π)
r′θ(θ=0)=r′θ(θ=2π) Eqs. (32)
Using the Eqs. (31) and (32), a contour of a particular cross-section of the tubular can be created. The N gratings may be used to calculate position coordinates along the contour, with index i=1 to N. In one aspect, the position coordinates and derivates of the first grating is obtained. Given the position r(i) and the first derivative r′(i) of a point i in the cross-section, the first derivative r′θ(i+1) of the adjacent point i+1 is calculated using Eq. (33):
The position r(i+1) can then be calculated as
Thus each point is used to calculate values for the next point along the circumference. For a given cross-section, the boundary values for the first point can be taken from the endpoint values obtained from the previously calculated cross-section. An educated estimate can be used as initial boundary values for the first cross-section. The values obtained for the Nth point are checked against a suitable criterion such as the criterion of Eq. (35):
[r(N)previous−r(N)current]2+[r′θ(N)previous−r′θ(N)current]2<σ Eq. (35)
where σ is a present tolerance for the combined square error between two iterations. In a typical calculation, σ may be set to 0.0001.
Thus, calculations described using the Eqs. (17)-(35) yield geometrical information for the bending deformations and for cross-sectional deformations. The obtained geometrical information can then be used to obtain a three-dimensional image of the tubular using exemplary methods discussed below.
In one aspect, the exemplary method of creating a 3D image includes introducing an unstressed tubular having an axis, applying the geometrical information of the bending parameter to the axis to obtain a bent axis, applying the geometrical information of the cross-sectional deformations and adjusting the orientation of the cross-sections to correspond with the orientation bent axis. In one aspect, the three-dimensional image may be sent to a display and a stresses on the tubular shown. The various step of the exemplary method are discussed below in reference to
wherein (x, y, z) and (x′, y′, z′) are respectively the coordinates of a surface point in the cross-section before and after the bending and (Δx, Δy, Δz) is the motion caused by the bending of the cross point between the plane and the axis.
Once the cross-section contours are centered on the bent axis, they are reoriented to reflect the bent axis using the exemplary methods discussed below. A tangent line to the bending axis is calculated, which is given in Eq. (37):
{right arrow over (l)}=(xi+1−xi){right arrow over (i)}+(yi+1−yi){right arrow over (j)}+(zi+1−zi){right arrow over (k)} (Eq. 37)
wherein (xi+1, yi+1, zi+1) and (xi, yi, zi) are coordinates of two closest neighboring points along the bending axis. In one embodiment, the cross-section contours are reoriented using a spherical coordinate system for spatial transformation. Eq. (37) can be rewritten in spherical coordinates as:
{right arrow over (l)}=r cos θ cos φ·{right arrow over (i)}+r cos θ sin φ·{right arrow over (j)}+sin φ·{right arrow over (k)} Eq. (38)
where
where θ is an azimuth angle around the y-axis and φ is an elevation angle. In a spherical coordinate system, to reorient the cross-section contours, one sets the original point in the cross between the axis and the cross-section, and the directions of the axis to be parallel to the current coordination system. The rotated coordinate system is achieved by rotating each cross-section contour by an azimuth angle (θ) around the y-axis and then rotating an elevation angle (φ) around the z-axis using:
Thus, exemplary methods are described herein for, among others, determining various deformation modes from strain data, applying filters to separate strain components for selected deformation modes, determining geometrical information from the various deformation modes and producing a three-dimensional image of a tubular from the obtained strain data.
The exemplary methods disclosed herein can be expanded to cover a broad range of tubular deformations. In one aspect, the exemplary methods allow real-time monitoring of tubular deformation information. In another aspect, the exemplary methods provide an increased accuracy of the data interpretation. The exemplary methods enhance sensitivity by depressing low frequency noises and removing high frequency noises.
Therefore, in one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method of determining a strain component for a deformation mode of a member, the method including: obtaining a plurality of measurements, each of the plurality of measurements related to a strain at a location of the member; selecting the deformation mode; and applying an adjustable filter to the plurality of strain measurements to determine the strain component for the selected deformation mode. The adjustable filter may be applied by obtaining a spectrum of the plurality of measurements in a frequency domain; and applying the adjustable filter to the spectrum. The adjustable filter may be one of a lowpass filter and a bandpass filter. The filter selects a frequency related to the selected deformation mode. A frequency response of the filter includes a cut-off frequency and a parameter defining frequency attenuation. The cut-off frequency is related to a wrap number of a plurality of sensors wrapped around the member to obtain the plurality of measurements and wherein the cutoff frequency jc(k) is given by
where M is a total number of measurements, N is a total number of sensors in a single wrap of the member, and k is an index for selecting the deformation mode. The attenuation parameter may be selected to remove a phase noise. The frequency response may be convolved with the plurality of measurements. The member may typically include one of: (1) a casing; (2) a sand screen; (3) a subsea riser; (4) an umbilical; (5) a tubing; (6) a pipeline; (7) a cylindrical structure bearing a load. The selected deformation mode may include one of: (1) a compression/tensile mode; (2) a bending mode; (3) an ovalization mode; (4) a triangularization mode; (5) a rectangularization mode; and (6) a deformation mode having a spatial frequency that is an integer multiple of a spatial frequency of a bending deformation. The plurality of measurements typically include one of: a measurement of wavelength shift; a measurement of frequency change; and a measurement of a change in impedance.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides an apparatus for determining a strain component for a deformation mode of a member, the apparatus including a plurality of sensors, each sensor of the plurality of sensors configured to obtain a measurement of related to a strain at the member; and a processor configured to select a deformation mode and apply an adjustable filter to the plurality of strain measurements to determine the strain component for the selected deformation mode. The processor may be configured to obtain a representation of the plurality of measurements in a frequency domain and apply the adjustable filter to the representation. The adjustable filter may be one of a lowpass filter and a bandpass filter. The processor adjusts the filter to select a frequency related to the selected deformation mode. A frequency response of the filter includes a cut-off frequency and a parameter defining frequency attenuation. The cut-off frequency is related to a wrap number of a plurality of sensors wrapped around the member to obtain the plurality of measurement and wherein
where M is a total number of measurements, N is a total number of sensors in a single wrap of the member, and k is an index for selecting the deformation mode. The attenuation parameter may be selected to remove a phase noise. The frequency response is convolved with the plurality of measurements. In one aspect, the member is one of: (1) a casing; (2) a sand screen; (3) a subsea riser; (4) an umbilical; (5) a tubing; (6) a pipeline; (7) a cylindrical structure bearing a load. The selected deformation mode may be one of: (1) a compression/tensile mode; (2) a bending mode; (3) an ovalization mode; (4) a triangularization mode; (5) a rectangularization mode; and (6) a deformation mode having a spatial frequency that is an integer multiple of a spatial frequency of a bending deformation. The plurality of measurements may include one of: a measurement of wavelength shift; a measurement of frequency change; and a measurement of a change in impedance.
In yet another aspect, the present disclosure provides a computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions that when read by a processor enable the processor to perform a method, the method comprising: obtaining strain measurements at a plurality of sensors, each of the plurality of measurements related to a strain at a location of the member; selecting the deformation mode; and applying an adjustable filter to the plurality of strain measurements to determine the strain component for the selected deformation mode.
While the foregoing disclosure is directed to the preferred embodiments of the disclosure, various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims be embraced by the foregoing disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4030064 | Elliott | Jun 1977 | A |
4859844 | Herman et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5050089 | Stelson et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5401956 | Dunphy et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5440310 | Schreiner | Aug 1995 | A |
5481922 | Washabaugh | Jan 1996 | A |
5625724 | Frederick et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5675674 | Weis | Oct 1997 | A |
5869835 | Udd | Feb 1999 | A |
5892860 | Maron et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5963321 | Wang | Oct 1999 | A |
6016702 | Maron | Jan 2000 | A |
6069686 | Wang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072567 | Sapack | Jun 2000 | A |
6233746 | Skinner | May 2001 | B1 |
6252656 | Wu et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256090 | Chen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285446 | Farhadiroushan | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314214 | Walter et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6346702 | Davis et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370406 | Wach et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6487349 | Wach et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6501067 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6545760 | Froggatt et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6611633 | Vohra et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6640647 | Hong et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6753791 | Wei et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7028543 | Hardage et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7245791 | Rambow et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7327907 | Shaibani et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7424186 | Arab-Sadeghabadi et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7769252 | Taverner et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7946341 | Hartog et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20010021843 | Bosselmann et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020075114 | Hall et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030217605 | Croteau et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030219147 | Nishiura | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040028311 | Moslehi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040065439 | Tubel et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083808 | Rambow et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040099420 | Kotrla et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040184700 | Li et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050149264 | Tarvin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167094 | Streich et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060120675 | Goldner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060225881 | O'Shaughnessy et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233482 | Rambow | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070051882 | Childers | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065077 | Childers et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070126594 | Atkinson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156019 | Larkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070251326 | Mathis | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070253144 | Kuwajima | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070289741 | Rambow | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080047662 | Dria | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080210725 | Birtwisle et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090063087 | Grichnik et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085710 | Meinke | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090097015 | Davies et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090254280 | Stoesz | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100051347 | Tchakarov et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100219334 | Legrand et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100303426 | Davis | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110054808 | Pearce et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110113852 | Prisco | May 2011 | A1 |
20120132417 | Dria et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143522 | Chen et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120143523 | Chen et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120143524 | Chen et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120143525 | Chen et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19913113 | Oct 2000 | DE |
0892244 | Jan 1999 | EP |
2368921 | May 2002 | GB |
2397885 | Aug 2004 | GB |
2411956 | Sep 2005 | GB |
2433112 | Jun 2007 | GB |
3252501 | Nov 1991 | JP |
2002107122 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2003294851 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2205374 | May 2003 | RU |
WO0012978 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO03014657 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO03050376 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO2006113327 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2006123068 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2008021881 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2009068907 | Jun 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English Abstract of RU 2205374, May 2003. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 28, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/059130. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 29, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/059119. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 29, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/059124. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 28, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/059122. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2011/059116. |
Barak, Phillip; “Smoothing and Differentiation by an Adaptive-Degree Polynomial Filter,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 67, No. 17, Sep. 1, 1995, pp. 2758-2762. |
Browne, M., et al.; “A multiscale polynomial filter for adaptive smoothing,” Digital Signal Processing 17, (2007), pp. 69-75. |
Hayes, Monson H.; “Recursive Least Squares, 9.4,” Statistical Digital Signal Processing and Modeling, 1996, pp. 541-553. |
Savitzky, A. et al.; “Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 36, No. 8, Jul. 1964, pp. 1627-1639. |
Rambow, F.H.K. et al.; “Real-Time Fiber-Optic Casing Imager,” Dec. 2010 SPE Journal, pp. 1095-1103. |
Timoshenko, S.; “Analysis of Bi-Metal Thermostats,” J.O.S.A. & R.S.I., Sep. 11, 1925, pp. 233-255. |
The extended European search report; Application No. 11845939; dated Nov. 2, 2015; pp. 1-7. |
The extended Eurpoean search report; Application No. 11845563; Date of Mailing: Aug. 20, 2015; pp. 1-7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120143524 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |