DETERMINING ABSORPTION AND SCATTERING COEFFICIENT USING A CALIBRATED OPTICAL REFLECTANCE SIGNAL

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20180180535
  • Publication Number
    20180180535
  • Date Filed
    June 20, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Published
    June 28, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A technique of optical scatter measurement of a sample, and analysis of a signal representative of radiation back-scattered by a sample illuminated by a light beam. The analysis determines optical properties of the sample. A method implemented is an iterative method for applying, to the analyzed signal, a calibration factor taking optical properties of the sample into consideration.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention lies in the field of the characterization of samples, and in particular biological samples, and more particularly the skin.


DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART

Optical measurements, used to characterize the optical properties of samples, are widespread. The measurements based on the detection of a signal backscattered by a sample illuminated by a light beam can in particular be cited. These are in particular Raman spectroscopy, fluorescent imaging or reflectance spectrometry.


Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy consists in exploiting the light backscattered by a scattering object subjected to a lighting, generally spotlighting. This technique proves powerful for characterizing surface optical properties of samples, in particular the scattering or absorption properties.


When implemented on the skin, this technique for example makes it possible to characterize the dermis or the epidermis, as described in the document EP 2762064. This document describes a measurement probe intended to be applied against the skin. This probe comprises a central optical fiber, called emission fiber, linked to a light source, and intended to direct a light beam toward a skin sample. Optical fibers, arranged around the central fiber, called detection fibers, collect an optical signal backscattered by the dermis, this optical signal being then detected by a photodetector. Means for spectral analysis of the optical signal, coupled to computation algorithms, make it possible to estimate parameters of the dermis, in particular the concentration of certain chromophores, for example oxyhemoglobin or deoxyhemoglobin and/or optical properties governing the paths of photons in the dermis, in particular the reduced scattering coefficient μs′ as well as the absorption coefficient μa.


Thus, the probe comprises an illumination line, intended to illuminate the sample, comprising the light source and the emission optical fiber. The probe also comprises a detection line, intended to detect a light backscattered by the sample, comprising the detection optical fibers and the photodetector. The properties of the illumination line and of the detection line are taken into account by virtue of a calibration step, allowing the calibration factor to be determined. The latter is obtained by performing a measurement on a calibration sample, whose optical properties are known. This calibration factor, denoted by the term Mstd in this application, is then applied to the signal measured by the photodetector, denoted by the term Mskin.


The document by Qin J, “Hyperspectral diffuse reflectance imaging for rapid, none contact measurement of the optical properties of turbid materials” Applied Optics vol. 45 No. 32, 10 Nov. 2006, describes a method for determining optical properties by diffuse reflectance spectrometry. This method comprises a detection, by a spectrometric photodetector, of a radiation backscattered by a sample to several backscattering distances. The signal thus detected is multiplied by a calibration factor. The estimation of the optical properties is performed by an adjustment using a scattering model representing the trend of the reduced scattering coefficient in the calibration sample. Thus, the determination of the optical properties is based on an a priori knowledge of the sample and of a model of scattering of the light in the sample analyzed, this model describing the trend of the value of the scattering coefficient as a function of the wavelength. The determination of the optical properties is quantitative only for an analyzed sample whose scattering coefficient reduces the same model as the calibration samples. It is understood that the need to be based on a model constitutes a restrictive limitation. Such a method is not suitable for a complex sample, for which the a priori scattering model is not known. Moreover, the taking into account of this model means that different estimations of an optical property, at different wavelengths, are not independent of one another, since they are linked by the model.


The inventors have observed that the methods cited previously are not optimal. One objective of the present invention is to improve the prior art methods, so as to determine the optical properties of a sample with increased accuracy.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One object of the invention is a method for determining an optical property of a sample, comprising the following steps:

    • i) illumination of a surface of the sample, using a light beam produced by a light source, so as to form, on the surface of said sample, an elementary illumination zone, corresponding to the part of said surface lit by said beam;
    • ii) acquisition, using a photodetector, of a backscattering signal, representative of a radiation backscattered, by the sample, at a distance, called backscattering distance, from said elementary illumination zone;
    • iii) selection of a calibration factor;
    • iv) application of said calibration factor to each backscattering signal, so as to obtain a quantity of interest, associated with said backscattering distance;
    • v) repetition of the steps iv) to v), by updating the calibration factor, as a function of said thus determined optical property, until a stop criterion or a predetermined number of iterations is reached;


The steps iv) to vi) can be repeated until a stop criterion or a predetermined number of iterations is reached.


According to an embodiment, at least one calibration factor is a measured calibration factor, by effecting a ratio between:

    • an estimation of a quantity representative of a backscattered radiation emanating from a surface of a calibration sample, to a backscattering distance from an elementary illumination zone of said calibration sample, when the calibration sample is illuminated by said light beam;
    • a measurement of said quantity, using a backscattering signal detected by said photodetector, the calibration sample being illuminated by said light beam.


A calibration factor can be determined by interpolation from two measured calibration factors, said measured calibration factors being obtained by using, respectively, two calibration samples whose optical properties are different.


According to an embodiment, in the step vi), the calibration factor can be replaced by a calibration factor determined as a function of the optical property defined in the step v) preceding said step vi). This optical property, considered for the updating of the calibration factor, can in particular be a scattering optical property. It can for example be a scattering coefficient or a reduced scattering coefficient.


The method can comprise at least one of the following features, taken alone or in all technically feasible combinations:

    • the step iv) comprises the application of a refresh factor, corresponding to the backscattering distance, to each calibration factor, the refresh factor having been previously determined, by:
      • measuring, at an instant t, a backscattering signal, representing a backscattered radiation emanating from the surface of a calibration sample, to a backscattering distance from an elementary illumination zone of said calibration sample, the calibration sample being illuminated by said light beam;
      • comparing said backscattering signal measured at the instant t to a signal measured, in the same conditions, at an instant t0, prior to the instant t.
    • In the step v), the determination of said optical property comprises a comparison between:
      • a quantity of interest,
      • a plurality of estimations of said quantity of interest, each estimation being performed by considering a predetermined value of said optical property.
    • Each backscattering signal is acquired at a plurality of wavelengths, such that the quantity of interest and the calibration factor can take the form of spectral functions, defined over said plurality of wavelengths.
    • The quantity of interest, associated with a backscattering distance, is obtained by the application of a ratio between the intensity of a backscattering signal, corresponding to said backscattering distance, by the intensity of said light beam, measured by the photodetector, in which case said quantity of interest is a reflectance.
    • In the step v), different values of said quantity of interest are considered, each value corresponding to a different backscattering distance.
    • The sample examined is a human, animal or plant tissue, or a food product.


Another object of the invention is an information storage medium, that can be read by a processor, comprising instructions for the execution of a method described above, these instructions being able to be executed by a processor.


Another object of the invention is a device for measuring an optical signal produced by a sample comprising:

    • a light source capable of emitting a light beam toward a surface of said sample, so as to form, on said surface, an elementary illumination zone
    • a photodetector capable of acquiring a backscattering signal, representative of a radiation backscattered by the sample at a distance, called backscattering distance, from said elementary illumination zone;


      the device being characterized in that it also comprises:
    • a processor, capable of implementing the method described above.


This device can in particular comprise an optical system, configured to ensure an optical coupling between the photodetector and an elementary detection zone situated on the surface of the sample, from which backscattered radiation emanates.





FIGURES


FIG. 1 represents a device allowing the application of the invention.



FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of this device, along a plane at right angles to the axis Z and passing through the distal end of the detection fibers.



FIG. 3A represents a so-called “remote” measurement configuration, whereby each optical detection fiber is placed at a distance from the sample analyzed.



FIG. 3B represents a so-called “contact” measurement configuration, whereby each optical detection fiber is placed in contact with the sample analyzed.



FIG. 4A represents the main steps of a method according to the invention.



FIG. 4B represents the main steps of a variant of the method represented in FIG. 4A.



FIG. 5 represents different calibration factors for three wavelengths (λ=470 nm, λ=607 nm and λ=741 nm), and for three different calibration samples, each calibration factor having a reduced scattering coefficient μs′ differing from one another.



FIG. 6 represents a modeling of the reflectance, at a given backscattering distance, for different values of the absorption coefficient μa and of the reduced scattering coefficient μs′.



FIGS. 7A, 7B, 7C and 7D represent the results of experimental tests, showing the influence of the choice of the calibration factor on the estimation of the reduced scattering coefficient (FIGS. 7A and 7C) or of the absorption coefficient (FIG. 7B and FIG. 7D).



FIGS. 8A, 8B, 8C and 8D represent the results of comparative experimental tests, showing the influence of the implementation of a method according to the invention on the estimation of the reduced scattering coefficient (FIGS. 8A and 8C) or of the absorption coefficient (FIG. 8B and FIG. 8D), according to a so-called contact measurement configuration, schematically represented in FIG. 3B.



FIGS. 9A, 9B, 9C and 9D represent the results of comparative experimental tests, showing the influence of the implementation of a method according to the invention on the estimation of the reduced scattering coefficient (FIGS. 9A and 9C) or of the absorption coefficient (FIG. 9B and FIG. 9D), according to a so-called remote measurement configuration, schematically represented in FIG. 3A.





EXPLANATION OF PARTICULAR EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1 represents a first embodiment of a device 1 according to the invention. It comprises a light source 10 which, in this example, is a white light source marketed by Ocean Optics under the reference HL2000.


The light source 10 comprises, in this example, an emission optical fiber 12, extending between a proximal end 14 and a distal end 16. The emission optical fiber 12 is capable of collecting the light by a proximal end 14 and of emitting a light beam 20 toward the sample by a distal end 16, said light beam being then directed toward the surface of a sample 50. In such a configuration, the light source 10 is said to be fibered.


The diameter of the emission optical fiber 12 lies between 100 μm and 1 mm, and is for example equal to 500 μm.


The device also comprises a plurality of detection optical fibers 221, 222, 223, . . . 22f . . . 22F, the index f lying between 1 and F, F denoting the number of detection optical fibers in the device. F is a natural integer generally lying between 1 and 100, and preferentially lying between 5 and 50. Each detection fiber 221, 222, 223, . . . 22f . . . 22F extends between a proximal end 241, 242, 243, . . . 24f . . . 24F and a distal end 261, 262, . . . 26f . . . 26F. In FIG. 1, the references 22, 24 and 26 respectively denote all of the detection fibers, all of the proximal ends of the detection fibers and all of the distal ends of the detection fibers. The diameter of each detection optical fiber 22 lies between 50 μm and 1 mm, and is for example equal to 100 μm. The proximal end 24 of each detection optical fiber 22 can be optically coupled to a photodetector 40. The distal end 261, 262, . . . 26F of each detection optical fiber 22 is capable of collecting, respectively, a radiation 521, 522, . . . 52F backscattered by the sample 50, when the latter is exposed to the light beam 20.


The photodetector 40 is capable of detecting each backscattered radiation 521, 522, . . . 52F so as to form a signal, called backscattering signal (S1, S2, . . . SN) as described herein below. The photodetector 40 can be a spectrally unresolved photodetector, for example a photodiode or a matrix photodetector of CCD or CMOS type. In this example, it is a spectrophotometer, capable of establishing the wavelength spectrum of the radiation collected by a detection optical fiber 22 to which it is coupled. The person skilled in the art will choose a spectrometric photodetector when he or she is prioritizing a good spectral resolution or a matrix photodetector when prioritizing a spatial resolution.


The photodetector 40 can be connected to a processor 48, the latter being linked to a memory 49 comprising instructions, the latter being able to be executed by the processor 48, to implement the method represented in FIG. 4A or 4B, and described herein below. These instructions can be saved on a storage medium, that can be read by a processor, of hard disk or CDROM type or other memory type.


The detection optical fibers 22 extend parallel to one another, parallel to a longitudinal axis Z about the emission optical fiber 12. They are held fixed relative to one another by a holding element 42. Their distal ends 26 are coplanar, and define, in this example, a detection plane 44.


An optical fiber 13, called excitation return fiber, links the light source 10 to the photodetector 40. This optical fiber is useful for performing a measurement Ssource representing the intensity of the source, detailed later.



FIG. 2 represents a cross-sectional view of the device, in the detection plane 44, formed by all of the distal ends 26 of the F detection fibers. In this example, F is equal to 36. As can be seen, the detection optical fibers are distributed according to:

    • a first group G1 of six detection optical fibers 221 . . . 226 arranged regularly along a circle centered on the emission optical fiber 12, such that the distal end 261 . . . 266 of each fiber of this group is distant from the distal end 16 of the emission optical fiber 12 by a first distance d1 equal to 300 μm;
    • a second group G2 of six detection optical fibers 227 . . . 2212, arranged regularly along a circle centered on the emission optical fiber 12, such that the distal end 267 . . . 2612 of each fiber of this group is distant from the distal end 16 of the emission optical fiber 12 by a second distance d2 equal to 700 μm;
    • a third group G3 of six detection optical fibers 2213 . . . 2218, arranged regularly along a circle centered on the emission optical fiber 12, such that the distal end 2613 . . . 2618 of each fiber of this group is distant from the distal end 16 of the emission optical fiber 12 by a third distance d3 equal to 1.1 mm;
    • a fourth group G4 of six detection optical fibers 2219 . . . 2224, arranged regularly along a circle centered on the emission optical fiber 12, such that the distal end 2619 . . . 2624 of each fibre of this group is distant from the distal end 16 of the emission optical fiber 12 by a fourth distance d4 equal to 1.5 mm;
    • a fifth group G5 of six detection optical fibers 2225 . . . 2530, arranged regularly along a circle centered on the emission optical fiber 12, such that the distal end 2625 . . . 2630 of each fiber of this group is distant from the distal end 16 of the emission optical fiber 12 by a fifth distance d5 equal to 2 mm;
    • a sixth group G6 of six detection optical fibers 2231 . . . 2236, arranged regularly along a circle centered on the emission optical fiber 12, such that the distal end 2631 . . . 2636 of each fiber of this group is distant from the distal end 16 of the emission optical fiber 12 by a sixth distance d6 equal to 2.5 μm.


When describing a distance between two fibers, or between a fiber or a light beam, a center-to-center distance is understood.


Thus, each distal end 26f of a detection optical fiber 22f is placed, in a plane at right angles to the longitudinal axis Z according to which these fibers extend, at a distance df from the light source 10 (that is to say from the distal end 16 of the emission fiber 12), and, consequently, at a distance df from the light beam 20 directed toward the sample 50.


According to a variant, the distal ends 26f of each detection optical fiber define a curved surface, that is adapted for example to the curvature of the surface of the sample 50.


As indicated previously, the device comprises a photodetector 40, capable of being coupled to the proximal end 24f of each detection optical fiber 22f. In this example, the photodetector is a spectrophotometer, capable of determining the spectrum of a radiation 521 . . . 52F backscattered by the sample when the latter is exposed to the light beam 20. For that, the proximal ends 24 of each group of detection optical fibers, described above, are grouped together and are, group by group, successively coupled to the photodetector 40 by means of an optical switch 41. In FIG. 1, the reference 52 denotes a radiation backscattered by the sample.


In this example, the device also comprises an optical system 30, exhibiting an enlargement factor G and an optical axis Z′. In this example, the optical axis Z′ coincides with the longitudinal axis Z along which the detection optical fibers extend, which constitutes a preferred configuration.


Generally, the optical system 30 allows an image of the surface of the sample 50 to be formed on the detection plane 44 formed by the distal ends 26 of each detection optical fiber 22, with a given enlargement factor G. Thus, each distal end 261, 262, 26F is respectively conjugate with an elementary detection zone 281, 282 . . . 28E of the surface of the sample. This way, each detection optical fiber 221, 222, 22F is capable of collecting, respectively, an elementary radiation 521, 522, 52f . . . 52F backscattered by the sample, each elementary radiation 521, 522, . . . 52F emanating from an elementary detection zone 281, 282 . . . 28F, on the surface of the sample.


Thus, each of said distal ends 261, 262 . . . 26E can be situated in an image focal plane of the optical system 30, and conjugate with an elementary detection zone 281, 282 . . . 28E situated in the object focal plane of said optical system, on the surface of the sample.


Likewise, the distal end 16 of the emission fiber 12 is conjugate with an elementary illumination zone 18 on the surface of the sample. Generally, the elementary illumination zone constitutes the point of impact of the light beam 20 on the surface of the sample 50.


Generally, whatever the embodiment, the term elementary zone denotes a zone of delimited form on the surface of the sample. Such an elementary zone is preferably a spot zone, that is to say that its diameter or its diagonal are less than 1 cm, and preferably less than 1 mm, even less than 500 μm.


An elementary detection zone can also take an annular form, centered on the elementary illumination zone, by defining a ring or an arc of a ring, circular or polygonal. The thickness of the ring is then preferably less than 1 cm. An elementary detection zone 28 can have any form, provided that this elementary zone is delimited by an outline, and distant from an elementary illumination zone 18, the latter also being able to have any form, but delimited and distinct from an elementary detection zone 28.


An elementary illumination zone 18 is passed through by the light beam 20, propagated toward the sample 50, whereas an elementary detection zone 28f is passed through by a backscattered radiation 52f, this radiation being produced by the backscattering, in the sample, of the light beam 20. The optical coupling, produced by the optical system 30, allows each detection fiber 22f to collect the elementary backscattered radiation 52f, the latter corresponding to the backscattered radiation passing through the elementary zone 28f.


The holding element 42 can ensure a rigid link between the detection optical fibers 22 and the optical system 30, so as to keep the detection plane 44, formed by the distal ends 26 of the detection optical fibers, at a fixed distance from the optical system 30.


Referring to FIG. 3A, if df is the distance between the distal end 26f of a detection fiber 22f and the distal end 16 of the emission fiber 12, said distance calculated in a plane at right angles to the optical axis Z′, the distance Df between the elementary detection zone 28f, conjugate with said distal end 26f, and the elementary illumination zone 18, conjugate with said distal end 16, is such that:







D
f

=


d
f

G





The distance Df is called backscattering distance, because it corresponds to the distance, from the elementary illumination zone 18, at which the backscattered photons are collected. That corresponds to the distance between the elementary illumination zone 18 and an elementary detection zone 28f.


Thus, as represented in FIG. 3A, the presence of the optical system 30 makes it possible to place the detection fibers 22 at a distance from the sample to be characterized, according to a so-called “remote” configuration. This distance is typically a few cm, for example between 1 and 30 cm.


According to a variant, the device is similar to that represented in FIG. 1, but it does not comprise any optical system 30. This variant corresponds to a measurement configuration called “contact” configuration. According to this variant, the detection fibers 22 are, preferably, applied directly in contact with the sample (50), by virtue of the absence of an optical system between the sample (50) and the distal end of each detection optical fiber 22. In this case, for each detection optical fiber, Df=df.


Generally, each detection optical fiber 22f is capable of collecting a backscattering radiation 52f from an elementary detection zone 28f, the latter being situated at a backscattering distance Df from the elementary illumination zone 18. In this example, by virtue of the concentric arrangement of the detection fibers around the illumination fiber, described in relation to FIG. 2, the device allows N distinct backscattering distances D1 . . . Dn . . . DN to be defined, N being here equal to 6. Each backscattering distance Dr, has a corresponding plurality of backscattered radiations, originating from different elementary detection zones. For example, the backscattering optical signals 521, 522, 523, 524, 525 and 526 correspond to the backscattering distance D1. As previously described, the detection fibers corresponding to one and the same group, that is to say at a same backscattering distance, are coupled. Because of this, each backscattered radiation corresponding to one and the same backscattering distance Dn (1≤n≤6) is addressed simultaneously to the photodetector 40, the latter producing a signal Sn, called a backscattering signal, representative of one or more backscattered radiations at said backscattering distance Dn.


Whatever the configuration of the device represented in FIG. 1, contact or remote, this device comprises:

    • an illumination line, capable of illuminating the surface of the sample, this line comprising the light source 10 and the emission optical fiber 12;
    • a detection line, capable of detecting a radiation 52f backscattered by the sample so as to form a backscattering signal Sn; this line comprises the photodetector 40 and any optical system 30 when the device is equipped therewith.


There now follows a description, in relation to FIG. 4A, of the main steps of an iterative method that can be implemented by the device previously described, in order to estimate one or more optical properties p of the sample studied. This iterative method is applied to the “contact” configuration or to the “remote” configuration previously described.


The term optical property p denotes, for example, one or more factors governing the absorption and/or the scattering of the photons in the sample studied, in particular an absorption coefficient, a scattering coefficient, a reduced scattering coefficient, a scattering anisotropy coefficient. In this example, the optical properties determined are the absorption coefficient μa and the reduced scattering coefficient μ′a.


1st step 110: application of the device previously described, facing the sample 50.


2nd step 120: illumination of the sample by directing a light beam 20 against the surface of the sample, the illuminated part of the surface of the sample constituting the elementary illumination zone 18.


3rd step 130: collection of a radiation 521, 522 . . . 52F backscattered by the sample, emanating respectively from each elementary detection zone 281, 282, . . . 28F, by the detection optical fiber 221, 222, . . . 22F whose distal end 261, 262, . . . 26F is respectively conjugate with said elementary zone 281, 282, 28F.


4th step 140: measurement, using a photodetector 40, of a backscattering signal Sn representative of the backscattering at each backscattering distance Dn. As previously indicated, the signal detected Sn is, in this example, established by aggregating the optical signals collected by the detection optical fibers of one and the same group Gn, that is to say corresponding to one and the same backscattering distance. The backscattering signal Sn then aggregates several backscattered radiations 52n, each of them being emitted according to one and the same backscattering distance Dn.


When the detector is a spectrometric detector, it generates the spectrum of the signal detected Sn, denoted Sp(Sn), from which it is possible to extract spectral components Sn(λ) representing the signal backscattered at the distance Dn, and at the wavelength λ.


5th step 150: using each signal Sn(λ), associated with a backscattering distance Dn, determination of a quantity of interest Rn(λ), on the basis of which the optical properties p of the samples studied will be determined. In this example, the quantity of interest Rn(λ) is a reflectance of the sample. Generally, the term reflectance represents the intensity of a radiation backscattered by the sample, normalized by the intensity of the incident beam on the sample. Its value depends on the wavelength λ, because of the trend of the optical properties of the scattering medium studied as a function of the wavelength.


In this example, the reflectance Rn(λ) depends on the backscattered signal Sn(λ) at the distance Dn, normalized by a quantity of light Ssource(λ) emitted by the source, at the wavelength λ, on the time of acquisition of the backscattered signal Sn and on a calibration factor. The reflectance Rn(λ) can be defined according to the expression:











R
n



(
λ
)


=





S
n



(
λ
)


-


S
ref



(
λ
)






S
source



(
λ
)


×
t


×


f
n
i



(
λ
)







(
1
)







in which:

    • Sn(λ) is the backscattering signal detected, corresponding to the backscattering distance Dn;
    • Sref(λ) is a reference signal, representative of parasitic signals, such as the noise of the detector 40 or parasitic reflections from the possible optical system 30, obtained by activating the light source, but without sample, the latter being, for example, replaced by an absorbent screen of black screen type;
    • Ssource(λ) is the signal produced by the light source. Ssource(λ) can in particular be established by coupling the light source to the photodetector, for example by means of a so-called excitation return optical fiber 13, represented in FIG. 1; in this case, the photodetector acquires a signal Ssource-direct, from which it is possible to subtract a signal Sref-source representative of the noise of the detector. If tsource denotes the time of acquisition of the signal Ssource-direct, Ssource can be such that:








S
source



(
λ
)


=





S

source


-


direct




(
λ
)


-


S

ref


-


source




(
λ
)




t
source


.







    • fni(λ) is a calibration factor, corresponding to the backscattering distance Dn and to the wavelength λ. The exponent i denotes the rank of the iteration, whereas the index n denotes the backscattering distance Dn. This factor takes into account the effect of different components of the illumination line and of the detection line on the backscattering signal. It involves taking account, for example, of efficiency of collection by the detection fibers 22, of the sensitivity of the photodetector 40, of the non-uniformity of the illumination beam 20 or, if necessary, of the efficiency of collection of the backscattered light by the optical system 30. This calibration factor is determined during a calibration phase. This calibration phase, implementing calibration samples, is performed before or after the measurement on the sample, and is described herein below.

    • t is the time of acquisition of the backscattering signal Sn.





The aim of the calibration phase described above is to establish a calibration factor fn,pcalib(λ) by applying the device described above to a calibration sample, whose optical properties Pcalib are known. For example, fn,pcalib(λ) can be such that:











f

n
,
pcalib




(
λ
)


=




R

calib


-


n

model



(
λ
)






S

calib


-


n




(
λ
)


-

S

ref


(
λ
)







S
source



(
λ
)


×

t
calib




=



R

calib


-


n

model



(
λ
)




R

calib


-


n




(
λ
)








(
2
)









    • Scalib-n(λ) is a backscattering signal detected, corresponding to the backscattering distance Dn by using the same device as that implemented to acquire the backscattering signal Sn(λ), the device being used in the same configuration: same source, same positioning in relation to the sample;

    • Sref(λ) is the reference signal described in relation to the expression (1);

    • Ssource(λ) is the signal representing the intensity of the illumination beam produced by the light source, described in relation to the expression (1);

    • tcalib(λ) is the time of acquisition of the signal Scalib-n(λ);

    • Rcalib-n(λ) is the reflectance of the calibration sample, associated with a backscattering distance Dn. In this example,











R

calib


-


n




(
λ
)


=




S

calib


-


n




(
λ
)


-


S
ref



(
λ
)






S
source



(
λ
)


×

t
calib









    • Rcalib-nmodel(λ) is an estimation of the reflectance Rcalib-n(λ), this estimation being able to be produced by modeling the path of the light in the calibration sample, in particular by means of computation code of Monte-Carlo type or by an analytical model.





Thus, the calibration factor fn,pcalib(λ) is a comparison between a modeled quantity of interest, in this case a reflectance, and the same quantity of interest measured by the device, on a calibration sample. This comparison generally takes the form of a ratio.


However, in the prior art, this calibration factor is obtained on a sample, whose optical properties pcalib are known, but are not necessarily representative of the optical samples of the sample being studied. Now, the inventors have determined that the value of this calibration factor can change, depending on the optical properties of the sample. For example, FIG. 5 represents different values of this calibration factor, obtained by using different calibration samples, at the wavelengths λ=470 nm, λ=607 nm and λ=741 nm. To perform these tests, water samples were formed, whose scattering and absorption properties are respectively modified by incorporation of intralipid and china ink. The calibration samples used comprise a concentration of intralipid % IL respectively equal to 1%, 2% and 3%, which confers on them different scattering properties, the absorption coefficient being equal to 0.4 cm−1 to 600 nm−1. The calibration factors represented were determined by considering a backscattering distance of 1.1 mm, the device 1 being placed at a distance from each calibration sample, the distance between the sample and the detection optical fibers ranging up to 20 cm.


By using experimental tests, described in relation to FIGS. 7A to 7D, as a basis, the inventors estimated that it was preferable to use a calibration factor which is as representative as possible of the optical properties of the samples studied. Now, in the first iteration, these properties are not known. Also, in the first iteration (i=1), an initial calibration factor is used, denoted fni=1(λ) that is determined arbitrarily, for example by using an a priori as to the optical properties of the sample studied as a basis.


6th step 160: for at least one wavelength λ and by considering at least as many different backscattering distances Dn as there are optical properties to be estimated, determination of the optical properties (p) exhibiting the least difference between the reflectance Rn(λ), determined in the preceding step, at the wavelength λ, and a modeled reflectance Rn,pmodel(λ), this reflectance being modeled by considering a plurality of values of said optical properties p, at said backscattering distance Dn. This determination can be made by the minimization of a root mean square deviation, and for example according to the expression:






p=argminpn=1N(Rn,pmodel(λ)−Rn(λ))2)  (3)

    • N denotes the number of backscattering distances taken into account,
    • Rn,pmodel is a reflectance modeled, at the backscattering distance Dn, by taking into account predetermined values of at least one optical property p. The parameter p can correspond to an optical property, or a set of optical properties.


In this example, the optical properties sought are μa(λ) and μ′s(λ). Thus, the pair μa(λ), μ′s(λ) sought is that exhibiting the least deviation between the measured reflectance Rn (λ), at the wavelength (λ), and a modeled reflectance Rn,μa,μs′model(λ) for different values of μa(λ) and of μ′s(λ), at said backscattering distance Dn. This determination can be made according to the expression





a(λ),μ′s(λ))=argmina(λ),μ′s(λ))n=1N(Rn,μa,μs′model(λ)−Rn(λ))2)  (3′),


Rn,μa,μs′model(λ) denoting a reflectance modeled, at the backscattering distance Dn, by considering different values of μa and μs′.


Reflectance values modeled Rn,μa,μs′model(λ) are obtained, for a plurality of pairs of values μa, μs′ during a parameterization phase, by numerical simulation implementing a method of Monte-Carlo type or by an analytical model. An analytical model can be used, preferably, only beyond a certain backscattering distance.


For a given backscattering distance Dn, it is possible to establish a plurality of reflectances Rn,μa,μs′model(λ) modeled as a function of μa and of μs′. FIG. 6 gives an example of representation of such modeled reflectances, by considering a backscattering distance Dn, equal to 700 μm and by taking into account values of the absorption coefficient lying between 0 and 10 cm−1, as well as values of the reduced scattering coefficient lying between 0 and 80 cm−1. The steps 150 and 160 are implemented by the processor 48, previously programmed for this purpose, and for which the input data are the measurements of the backscattering signals Sn(λ) produced by the photodetector 40. Each calibration factor, as well as each value Rn,pmodel(λ), can be stored in a memory, for example the memory 49, linked to the processor 48.


7th step 170: updating of the calibration factor.


The implementation of this step assumes that different calibration factors fn,p(λ) corresponding to calibration samples of known optical properties p, at a backscattering distance Dn, and at a wavelength λ, have been previously determined.


Generally, the notation fn,p(λ) corresponds to a calibration factor corresponding to the optical properties p, at the backscattering distance Dn, for the wavelength λ. This calibration factor can be obtained using a measurement on a calibration sample, in which case it can also be denoted fn,calibp(λ) the index calibp referring to the calibration sample of optical properties p. It can also be determined by interpolation calculation, as described herein below.


These different calibration factors can be obtained experimentally, by using calibration samples of known optical properties p, as described in relation to FIG. 5 or the equation (2). When several experimental measurements have been performed, it is possible to determine interpolated calibration factors between two calibration factors fn,p(λ), fn,p′(λ) corresponding respectively to samples of optical properties p and p′. The interpolation can be a linear interpolation.


It is then possible to have a library of calibration factors fn,p(λ) corresponding to different backscattering distances Dn, to different optical properties p and to different wavelengths λ. These calibration factors are stored in a memory, for example the memory 49 linked to the processor 48. The inventors estimate that it is sufficient, between two iterations, for the calibration factors to be updated as a function of a scattering property of the sample, an update as a function of an absorption property being able to be omitted.


The step 170 consists in updating the calibration factor implemented in the method, by replacing each calibration factor fni(λ), associated with a backscattering distance Dn in the current iteration i by a calibration factor corresponding to the optical properties p determined in the step 160, or by a calibration factor associated with an optical property that is as close as possible to the optical property p determined in the preceding step 160. Also, in the step 170, fni+1(λ)=fn,p(λ), the parameter p being the optical parameter determined in the step 160. This calibration factor fni+1(λ) is then used in the step 150 of the next iteration i+1.


The iterative process is stopped after a predetermined number of iterations, or when the deviation between optical properties pi, pi+1 determined during the step 160 of two successive iterations i and i+1, is below a predetermined threshold. The method then goes on to the step 180 of exiting the algorithm.



FIG. 4B represents a variant of this method, in which the steps 110 to 180 are similar to those explained in relation to FIG. 4A. However, prior to the implementation of this method, the device 1 is placed facing a calibration sample whose optical properties pcalib are known. In effect, the inventors have found that a calibration factor fn,p(λ) is not stable in time, and that is because of the evolution of the properties of the components that make up the illumination line and the detection line. That can stem from a normal evolution of these components, for example the wear of an optical fiber, or the aging of the source, or even a slight displacement of the optical system. Because of this, a calibration factor fn,p,t0(λ) determined at an instance t0 may be different from a calibration factor fn,p,t(λ) determined at an instant t, and all the more so when the time interval ΔT=t−t0 is significant. In order to take account of this drift, the inventors have implemented a refreshing of the calibration factors fn,p,t0(λ) determined at an instant t0 and stored in memory. This is the object of the steps 100 to 106.


The steps 100, 101, 102 and 103 are respectively similar to the steps 110, 120, 130 and 140, the only difference being that the sample analyzed is the calibration sample. The detection optical fibers 22 collect a plurality of backscattered radiations 521* . . . 52F*, the exponent * denoting the fact that a calibration sample is used. The photodetector 40 then forms as many backscattering signals Scalib-1(λ) . . . Scalib-N(λ) as there are different backscattering distances D1 . . . DN.


As indicated in relation to the equation (2), the step 104 allows a reflectance Rcalib-n(λ) to be obtained, at each backscattering distance Dn, and for each wavelength λ considered. In the step 105, a calibration factor fn,pcalib*,t (λ) is determined that corresponds to the calibration sample, according to the equation 2.


In the step 106, a refresh factor kn,t(λ) is determined, associated with a backscattering distance Dn and with a wavelength λ, kn,t(λ) being such that:











k

n
,
t




(
λ
)


==



f

n
,

pcalib
*

,
t




(
λ
)




f

n
,

pcalib
*

,

t





0





(
λ
)







(
4
)









    • fn,pcalib*,t(λ) denoting the calibration factor, at the wavelength λ, produced at the current instant (instant t), on a calibration sample of known properties Pcalib*, and corresponding to the backscattering distance Dn,

    • fn,pcalib*,t0(λ) denoting the calibration factor, at the wavelength λ, produced at an instant t0, prior to the current instant, on the same calibration sample, of optical properties pcalib*, and corresponding to the backscattering distance Dn. By combining the equations (4) and (2), the following is obtained:















k

n
,
t




(
λ
)


==



f

n
,

pcalib
*

,
t




(
λ
)




f

n
,

pcalib
*

,

t





0





(
λ
)




=






S



calib
*



-


n

,

t





0





(
λ
)


-

S

ref
,

t





0


(
λ
)







S

source
,

t





0





(
λ
)



×

t


calib
*

,
t








S



calib
*



-


n

,
t




(
λ
)


-

S

ref
,

t


(
λ
)







S

source
,
t




(
λ
)



×

t


calib
*

,

t





0









(

4


)







The indices t and t0 refer respectively to the measurement instants t and t0. The exponent * represents a measurement performed on a calibration sample used to determine the refresh factor. The refresh factor kn,t(λ) is essentially governed by the evolution of the backscattered signals Scalib*-n,t0(λ) and Scalib*-n,t(λ).


Also, more generally, the refresh factor kn,t(λ) is determined by comparing:

    • a backscattering signal Scalib*-n,t(λ), representing a backscattered radiation emanating from the surface of a calibration sample, at a backscattering distance (Dn) from an illumination zone of said calibration sample, the latter being illuminated by said light beam (20);
    • and a backscattering signal Scalib*-n,t0(λ), measured, in the same conditions, at an instant t0 prior to the instant t.


The calibration sample used for the determination of the refresh factor, according to the equations (4) and (4′), can be any calibration sample. Preferably, it is a calibration sample that can easily be transported, whose optical properties are particularly stable, in particular between the instants t and t0. It can for example be a sample produced using a solid resin, whose optical absorption and scattering properties are respectively adjusted by the addition of china ink and of scattering particles of titanium oxide (TiO2).


The inventors have estimated that such a refresh factor can be applied to all the calibration factors previously computed, whether they are derived from other calibration samples, less stable or less transportable, or from interpolation computations. Thus, each calibration factor fn,p,t0(λ), after having been determined at an instant t0, prior to the instant t, and stored in the memory 49, can be simply refreshed by the update formula:






f
n,p,t(λ)=kn,t(λ)×fn,p,t0(λ)  (5)


in which:

    • fn,p,t(λ) denotes the calibration factor, corresponding to the optical properties p, and to the backscattering distance D, refreshed at the current instant t;
    • fn,p,t0(λ) denotes the calibration factor, corresponding to the optical properties p, and to the backscattering distance Dn, determined at the instant t0 and stored in the memory 49.


Note that a single calibration sample can suffice to determine the refresh factor kn,t(λ), and allow the refreshing of all of the calibration factors fn,p,t0(λ) established previously, corresponding to the backscattering distance Dn with which the refresh factor is associated, and stored in the memory 49.


The refresh factor kn,t(λ) is then implemented, in the form of a multiplying term, in the step 150 of the determination quantity of interest Rn(λ) from the backscattering signal Sn(λ). The expression (1) can then be replaced by the expression (1′):











R
n



(
λ
)


=





S
n



(
λ
)


-


S
ref



(
λ
)






S
source



(
λ
)


×
t


×


f
n
i



(
λ
)


×


k

n
,
t




(
λ
)







(

1


)







Experimental tests implementing the device represented in FIGS. 1 and 2 will now be described, in a remote configuration or in a contact configuration. The device is arranged facing test samples comprising a water base, and whose optical absorption and scattering properties are adjusted respectively by the addition of china ink and of intralipid.


During these tests, the optical properties p sought are the absorption coefficient μa and the reduced scattering coefficient μs′.



FIGS. 7A and 7B represent respective estimations of the reduced scattering coefficient and of the absorption coefficient as a function of the wavelength, in tests performed in contact on a test sample whose optical properties are known: its absorption coefficient is equal to 1 cm−1 at 600 nm, whereas its reduced scattering coefficient, equivalent to a concentration of 1.5% of intralipid, rises to 22 cm−1 at 600 nm.


In FIG. 7A, each dotted-line curve corresponds to the theoretical value of the reduced scattering coefficient of 4 calibration samples, as a function of the wavelength. Each calibration sample has a same absorption coefficient μa=0.4 cm−1 at 600 nm and a concentration of intralipid respectively equal to 1%, 1.5%, 2% and 3%. Their reduced scattering coefficients μs′, at 600 nm, are respectively 13.5 cm−1, 20.3 cm−1, 27 cm−1 and 40.6 cm−1. These four calibration samples are respectively denoted “CF1%”, “CF1.5%”, “CF2%” and “CF3%”. These calibration samples are used to establish a calibration factor fn,p(λ), associated with the optical properties p of each sample.


The test sample was subjected to an illumination by the light source 10, during which the backscattered signal S2(λ) . . . S6(λ) was detected, corresponding respectively to 5 backscattering distances D2 . . . D6. The wavelength spectrum of each of these detected signals was produced, in a spectral band lying between 470 nm and 880 nm. The reflectance of the test sample R2(λ) . . . R6(λ), at the different backscattering distances, was determined by using the expression (1).


At each wavelength λ, each calibration factor fn,p(A), associated with each calibration sample, was successively considered so as to calculate 4 measurements of the reflectance. The reduced scattering coefficient μs′(λ) (see solid-line curve of FIG. 7A) and the absorption coefficient μa(λ) (see solid-line curve of FIG. 7B) were then estimated, each estimation being respectively associated with the recognition of a calibration factor established using a calibration sample, as indicated in the key to these curves.


In FIG. 7A, the dotted-line curve denoted “μs′-test” corresponds to the reduced scattering coefficient μs′(λ) of the test sample. It represents the exact value of the reduced scattering coefficient as a function of the wavelength. The solid-line curves correspond to the estimations of this coefficient, at different wavelengths. It appears that the conclusion of a calibration factor based on the calibration sample CF3% culminates in an erroneous estimation of μs′(λ). The estimations using a calibration factor established with the other calibration samples (CF1.5%, CF1% and CF2%) are more in line with reality, the best estimation being obtained with the calibration factor established with the calibration sample CF1.5%. That confirms the basic hypothesis of this invention, whereby the optical properties of a sample are all the better estimated when they are calculated based on a calibration factor fn,p(λ) representative of the optical properties of said sample.


In FIG. 7B, the dotted-line curve denoted “μa-test” corresponds to the absorption coefficient μa(λ) of the test sample. It represents the exact value of the absorption coefficient as a function of the wavelength. The solid-line curves correspond to estimations of this coefficient, at different wavelengths, each estimation being made by considering a calibration factor fn,p(λ) determined respectively with each calibration sample. As in FIG. 7A, the estimations based on the sample CF3% lead to erroneous results, the best estimation being that taking account of the calibration sample CF1.5%.



FIGS. 7C and 7D respectively represent results similar to FIGS. 7A and 7B, the device used comprising an optical system 30, allowing it to be used at a distance from the sample. In this configuration, the distal end of the detection optical fibers is placed at 20 cm from the surface of the sample. It is observed that the inclusion of a calibration factor representative of the optical properties of the sample studied very significantly improves the estimation of the absorption coefficient. More specifically, it is noted that the inclusion of a calibration factor based on different optical properties of the sample studied leads to significant errors in the estimation of the absorption coefficient, as the curve CF3% of FIG. 7D shows.



FIGS. 8A, 8B and 8C, 8D represent estimations of the optical properties (μs′(λ) and μa(λ)) respectively according to the prior art and by implementing the invention, the device being applied in contact with four test samples. The real values of the reduced scattering coefficient of each test sample are represented by dotted lines in FIGS. 8A and 8C. The real values of the absorption coefficient of each test sample are represented by dotted lines in FIGS. 8B and 8D. These 4 test samples, denoted IL1%, IL1.5%, IL2%, IL3% are respectively identical to the calibration samples CF1%, CF1.5%, CF2% and CF3% previously described. In each figure, the solid-line curves correspond to estimations of the coefficients μs′(λ) or μa(λ) of each test sample.



FIG. 8A represents estimations of the reduced scattering coefficient of each test sample. In this figure, for each estimation, the same calibration factor was used, established using the calibration sample CF1%. The reduced scattering coefficient is correctly estimated for the sample IL1%, since the method uses a calibration factor established with this same sample. The reduced scattering coefficient of the sample IL1.5% is also determined correctly. On the other hand, the reduced scattering coefficients of these samples IL2% and IL3% are not estimated with satisfactory accuracy.



FIG. 8C represents similar measurements, by implementing the algorithm previously described, with, in the first iteration, the use of a calibration factor established using the calibration sample IL1%. Contrary to the results obtained in FIG. 8A, the reduced scattering coefficient of each test sample was correctly estimated.



FIG. 8B represents estimations of the absorption coefficient of each test sample. In this figure, for each test sample, the same calibration factor was used, established using the calibration sample CF1%. FIG. 8D represents similar measurements, by implementing the algorithm previously described, with, in the first iteration, the use of a calibration factor established using the calibration sample CF1%. The accuracy of the estimation is satisfactory in both cases, but the implementation of the algorithm increases this accuracy.


For each of these figures, the square root of the mean square error was estimated, denoted E, normalized, estimated according to the expression:






ɛ
=





mean
λ

[



p


(
λ
)


-


p


(
λ
)



]

2


×
100





with:

    • p(λ)=real value of the optical property p at the wavelength λ, the optical property being either the reduced scattering coefficient μs′ or the absorption coefficient μa.
    • custom-character=estimation of the optical property p at the wavelength λ, the optical property being either the reduced scattering coefficient μs′ or the absorption coefficient μa.


The results corresponding to the different FIG. 8A (estimation of μs′ without implementation of the invention), 8B (estimation of μa without implementation of the invention), 8C (estimation of μs′ with implementation of the invention), and 8D (estimation of μa with implementation of the invention), are reported in table 1 below:















TABLE 1







ε
IL1%
IL1.5%
IL2%
IL3%























μa
FIG. 8B
29.1%
20.7%
23.4%
29.3%




FIG. 8D
29.1%
17.5%
31.4%
26.5%



μ′s
FIG. 8A
 3.7%
 5.5%
 6.7%
38.9%




FIG. 8C
 3.7%
 3.7%
 7.1%
 6.7%











FIGS. 9A, 9B, 9C and 9D represent tests similar to those reported respectively reported in FIGS. 8A, 8B, 8C and 8D, the only difference being that the device is used according to a “remote” configuration, and by implementing an optical focusing system, the distance between the end of each detection fiber and the sample being 20 cm.


For each of these figures, the square root of the mean square error, ε, was also estimated, as previously defined. The results are reported in table 2 below.















TABLE 2







ε
IL1%
IL1.5%
IL2%
IL3%























μa
FIG. 9B
13.9%
71.8%
  86%
  86%




FIG. 9D
13.9%
 9.3%
11.9%
10.3%



μ′s
FIG. 9A
 1.9%
 3.5%
 6.8%
 8.3%




FIG. 9C
 1.9%
 2.5%
 2.1%
 2.6%










The implementation of an algorithm according to the invention makes it possible to significantly improve the accuracy of the estimations of optical properties of the sample.


Although the tests described were carried out by implementing a white light source and a spectrometric photodetector 40, configurations based on a monochromatic light source, or a plurality of light sources emitting in different spectral bands, and/or the detection of a backscattering signal using a non-spectrometric photodetector can be envisaged.


In particular, the white light source can be replaced by different light sources emitting in different spectral bands λ1, λ2 . . . λL. Thus, the illumination beam 20 can comprise, simultaneously or successively, different spectral bands λ1, λ2 . . . λL. The device can also comprise a light source, comprising a plurality of band pass optical fibers, that can be successively placed facing the source. In this way, the illumination beam 20 successively comprises different spectral bands λ1, λ2 . . . λL.


Generally, the light source, whatever it may be, can form, on the surface of the sample, an elementary illumination zone as previously defined. The recourse to optical fibers to form the illumination beam is not essential. A light source could be a laser source, or another light source, for example a light-emitting diode. The light source can be coupled to an optical forming system, allowing the formation of the light beam 20 and the projection thereof onto the surface of the sample in order to define the elementary illumination zone 18.


Similarly, the photodetector can be a photodiode, or a matrix photodetector of CCD or CMOS type. Each pixel of the photodetector is then coupled to an elementary detection zone either by the optical system 30, or by being placed in contact with the surface of the sample, or possibly via optical fibers. The use of such a photodetector makes it possible to obtain a large number of different backscattering distances. It should be preferred in the applications requiring a good spatial resolution. When the light source is capable of forming an illumination beam 20, successively, in different spectral bands λ1, λ2 . . . λL, such a photodetector can detect measure a backscattering signal Sn(λ), successively, in each of the spectral bands. Preferably, the optical property is then determined in each spectral band, independently of one another, by implementing the steps described above. As can be seen in relation to the examples described above, the width of a spectral band can be less than 10 nm, so as to have an accurate estimation of the evolution of the optical property considered as a function of the wavelength.


The number N of backscattering distances can also vary. Generally, this number should be greater than or equal to the number of optical properties to be determined.


The invention can be implemented to characterize the surface optical properties of a sample. When applied to the skin, it for example makes it possible to detect pathologies early, check the vascularization or the perfusion of an active principle. It can be applied to any application, of non-destructive inspection type, making it possible to estimate or track the evolution of an optical property in proximity to the surface of a sample. It can for example concern applications in the field of agro-foods, in order to check the quality or the composition of food products.

Claims
  • 1-13. (canceled)
  • 14. A method for determining an optical property of a sample, comprising: i) illuminating a surface of the sample, using a light beam produced by a light source, to form, on the surface of the sample, an elementary illumination zone, corresponding to a part of the surface lit by the light beam;ii) acquiring, using a photodetector, a backscattered signal, at a wavelength representative of a radiation backscattered, at the wavelength, by the sample at a backscattering distance, from the elementary illumination zone;iii) selecting a calibration factor corresponding to the backscattering distance and to the wavelength;iv) applying the calibration factor to the backscattered signal, to obtain a quantity of interest, associated with the backscattering distance;v) determining at least one optical property of the sample, at the wavelength, using the quantity of interest;vi) repeating the iv) to v), by updating the calibration factor, as a function of the determined optical property, until a stop criterion or a predetermined number of iterations is reached;wherein at least one calibration factor is a calibration factor measured by effecting a ratio between: an estimation of a quantity representative of a backscattered radiation emanating from a surface of a calibration sample, at the wavelength, to the backscattering distance from the elementary illumination zone of the calibration sample, when the calibration sample is illuminated by the light beam;a measurement of the quantity, using a backscattered signal detected by the photodetector, at the wavelength, the calibration sample being illuminated by the light beam; andwherein least one calibration factor is determined by interpolation from two measured calibration factors, at the wavelength, the measured calibration factors being previously obtained by using, respectively, two calibration samples whose optical properties are different.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein in the vi), the calibration factor is updated by a calibration factor determined as a function of the optical property defined in the v) preceding the vi).
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the optical property considered for the updating of the calibration factor is a scattering property.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the optical property is chosen from: a scattering coefficient, or a reduced scattering coefficient.
  • 18. The method of claim 14, wherein the iv) comprises application of a refresh factor, determined by: measuring, at an instant t, a backscattered signal, representing a backscattered radiation emanating from the surface of a calibration sample, at the backscattering distance from the elementary illumination zone of the calibration sample, the calibration sample being illuminated by the light beam;comparing the backscattered signal measured at the instant t to a signal measured, in same conditions, at a previous instant t0 prior to the instant t,such that each calibration factor, corresponding to the backscattering distance, is refreshed by the refresh factor.
  • 19. The method of claim 14, wherein, in the v), the determination of the optical property comprises a comparison between: a quantity of interest;a plurality of estimations of quantity of interest, each estimation being performed by considering a predetermined value of the optical property.
  • 20. The method of claim 14, wherein each backscattering signal is acquired at a plurality of wavelengths, such that the quantity of interest and the calibration factor are spectral functions, defined over the plurality of wavelengths.
  • 21. The method of claim 14, wherein the quantity of interest, associated with a backscattering distance, is obtained by application of a ratio between the intensity of a backscattered signal, corresponding to the backscattering distance, by the intensity of the light beam, measured by the photodetector, in which case the quantity of interest is a reflectance.
  • 22. The method of claim 14, wherein, in the v), different values of the quantity of interest are considered, each value corresponding to a different backscattering distance.
  • 23. The method of claim 14, wherein the sample studied is a human, animal, or plant tissue, or a food product.
  • 24. A non-transitory computer readable information storage medium, comprising instructions for execution of a method as claimed in claim 14, these instructions being configured to be executed by a processor.
  • 25. A device for measuring an optical signal produced by a sample comprising: a light source configured to emit a light beam toward a surface of the sample, to form, on the surface, an elementary illumination zone;a photodetector, configured to acquire a backscattered signal, representative of a radiation backscattered by the sample at a backscattering distance, from the elementary illumination zone;a processor, capable of implementing the iii) to vi) of the method of claim 14.
  • 26. The device of claim 25, further comprising an optical system, configured to ensure an optical coupling between the photodetector and an elementary detection zone located on the surface of the sample, from which the backscattered radiation emanates.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1555657 Jun 2015 FR national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/FR2016/051501 6/20/2016 WO 00