1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a computer program product, system, and method for determining linkage metadata of content of a target document to source documents.
2. Description of the Related Art
Often a target document needs to be compared against other source documents to determine if the target document has content matching or copied from the source documents. For instance, the source documents may comprise sensitive organizational documents which are confidential to the organization, such as a corporation or government body. However, sensitive documents often tend to propagate freely within an organization and across the organization network boundaries onto the Internet. One particular problem is when a sensitive document with proprietary, competitive or private information is leaked outside the organization without authorization.
In addition to the organizational and corporate setting, various services are available to determine whether a student paper has plagiarized documents in a database of papers. One such student plagiarism detection service is Turnitin (see turnitin.com).
Known techniques to determine whether a target document has copied content from other source documents, such as sensitive corporate documents or papers, involve comparing the content of the target document with the source document.
One technique for determining textual relatedness is Koala Document Fingerprinting (KDF), which has been used to determine the relatedness of computer science research documents such as technical reports, conference papers and journal articles. In a Koala search technique, the document (URL) is loaded to the KDF server as a textual representation. Then, using this text, a fingerprint of the document is generated. Finally, this fingerprint is matched against the current document fingerprint database to find related documents.
Provided are to a computer program product, system, and method for determining linkage metadata of content of a target document to source documents. In response to a determination that a target fragment in a target document matches a source fragment in a source document, linkage metadata is generated for the target fragment.
A source document may be copied freely and modified many times between the time when it was originally authored and the time that it is viewed by any given party. In the context of leaked materials, this linkage of a target document to its source may be deliberately obscured to prevent the determination of the source of a leaked target document.
Described embodiments compare document content from a target document against a database of content of known source documents to identify a possible origin of fragments of the target document content. Potential linkage metadata from matches in the target document content are determined based on knowledge of the origin of the content from the source documents, such as the lineage of the documents, may be verified to arrive at a likely origin of leaked content. The derived knowledge of the linkage metadata may be used to populate known document content to act as an input in further linkage metadata determinations.
Described embodiments provide techniques to determine if content from a target document matches content in one or more source documents. Further, the described embodiments determine linkages among target fragments and source documents having source fragments matching the target fragments to provide the user information on how the target fragments relate to one or more source documents having the matching or copied source fragment. This allows a determination of the lineage of a target fragment with respect to source documents.
The content database 116 includes source documents 114 having content to compare against received target document 110. The content database 116 may further store previously received target documents 110, including the submitted target document 110 from clients 104. The content analyzer 112 generates source document records 200 having information on the source documents 114 to use in comparison operations; target document records 400 having information on target documents 118 being examined for copying from the source documents 114; source fragment records 300 having information on fragments or portions of the source documents 114; and target fragment records 500 having information on fragments of the target documents 118 and their relation to source documents.
The content analyzer 112 may be implemented as code in a computer readable storage medium executed by a processor. Alternatively, the content analyzer 112 may be implemented with hardware logic, such as an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC).
The content database 116 may be implemented in a storage comprising one or more storage devices known in the art, such as interconnected storage devices, where the storage devices may comprise hard disk drives, solid state storage device (SSD) comprised of solid state electronics, such as a EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory), flash memory, flash disk, Random Access Memory (RAM) drive, storage-class memory (SCM), etc., magnetic storage disk, optical disk, tape, etc. The network 106 may comprise a network such as one or more interconnected Local Area Networks (LAN), Storage Area Networks (SAN), Wide Area Network (WAN), peer-to-peer network, wireless network, etc.
The matching metadata attribute values 514i used to form linkage metadata 512 may comprise at least one of an author of the source fragments, a source document having the source fragments, and a date of the source fragments. In certain situations, a linkage metadata instance 512i may associate the target fragment with one or more source fragments having a matching attribute value. Alternatively, the linkage metadata 512i may associate source fragments and not the target fragment if the target fragment does not have the metadata attribute value 514i of the linkage metadata 512i. Further, the target fragment and combinations of one or more of the source fragments may be associated in multiple linkage metadata instances, e.g., 512i, 512j, if they have the metadata attribute values of multiple linkage metadata instances.
After generating target fragment records 500, control proceeds to block 730 in
For instance, if metadata attribute j comprises an author, then the target fragment and/or source fragments associated with the linkage metadata all have the same author, same document source, same language. In this way, the target fragment and/or matching source fragments maybe grouped into linkage metadata for a particular metadata attribute. This linkage information may then provide a linkage of the target fragments to source fragments in a same document or from a same author.
After generating all the associations or groups of matching target and source fragments having a same metadata attribute value, the content analyzer 112 may generate (at block 740) for each linkage metadata 512, a visualization of linkages among source documents including the target fragments in the linkage metadata and a visualization of a linkage from the target fragment i to the linked source documents for the linkage metadata. In this way, a user may observe linkages of a target fragment in the target document to source documents having a source fragment matching the target fragments and linkages according to different metadata attributes of the source documents having the matching source fragments.
The content analyzer 112 may determine (at block 742) timestamps of the matching source fragments in the source fragment metadata 310 and generate (at block 744) metadata linkages among the linked source documents an ordering of the source documents according to the timestamps of the matching source fragments. In this way, the order of the source documents having a matching source fragment is shown based on the temporal order of the copied or matching source fragments.
The content analyzer 112 may further determine (at block 746) if there is one matching source fragment in at least two linkage metadata instances, i.e., having metadata attribute values matching two linkages 512i. If so, then a visualization is generated (at block 748) linking the source fragment in two different linkage metadata instances for different attributes, such as by visualizing a connection between the source document including the source fragment in two linkage metadata instances.
After processing all the target fragments, control may proceed to block 752 in
Described embodiments provide techniques for determining fragments in a target document that are copied from or match source fragments in source documents in a content database. Further, metadata for the matching source fragments is considered to determine linkage metadata of at least two fragments of the target and matching source fragment based on the metadata of the matching fragments. In this way, linkages of the fragments of the target documents that were improperly copied may be shown to provide the user with additional useful information, like the author in the source fragments that match the target fragments.
The described operations may be implemented as a method, apparatus or computer program product using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof. Accordingly, aspects of the embodiments may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore, aspects of the embodiments may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.
Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
Aspects of the present invention are described above with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The terms “an embodiment”, “embodiment”, “embodiments”, “the embodiment”, “the embodiments”, “one or more embodiments”, “some embodiments”, and “one embodiment” mean “one or more (but not all) embodiments of the present invention(s)” unless expressly specified otherwise.
The terms “including”, “comprising”, “having” and variations thereof mean “including but not limited to”, unless expressly specified otherwise.
The enumerated listing of items does not imply that any or all of the items are mutually exclusive, unless expressly specified otherwise.
The terms “a”, “an” and “the” mean “one or more”, unless expressly specified otherwise.
Devices that are in communication with each other need not be in continuous communication with each other, unless expressly specified otherwise. In addition, devices that are in communication with each other may communicate directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries.
A description of an embodiment with several components in communication with each other does not imply that all such components are required. On the contrary a variety of optional components are described to illustrate the wide variety of possible embodiments of the present invention.
Further, although process steps, method steps, algorithms or the like may be described in a sequential order, such processes, methods and algorithms may be configured to work in alternate orders. In other words, any sequence or order of steps that may be described does not necessarily indicate a requirement that the steps be performed in that order. The steps of processes described herein may be performed in any order practical. Further, some steps may be performed simultaneously.
When a single device or article is described herein, it will be readily apparent that more than one device/article (whether or not they cooperate) may be used in place of a single device/article. Similarly, where more than one device or article is described herein (whether or not they cooperate), it will be readily apparent that a single device/article may be used in place of the more than one device or article or a different number of devices/articles may be used instead of the shown number of devices or programs. The functionality and/or the features of a device may be alternatively embodied by one or more other devices which are not explicitly described as having such functionality/features. Thus, other embodiments of the present invention need not include the device itself.
The illustrated operations of the figures show certain events occurring in a certain order. In alternative embodiments, certain operations may be performed in a different order, modified or removed. Moreover, steps may be added to the above described logic and still conform to the described embodiments. Further, operations described herein may occur sequentially or certain operations may be processed in parallel. Yet further, operations may be performed by a single processing unit or by distributed processing units.
The server 102 and client 104 systems in the computing environment of
As shown in
Computer system/server 900 typically includes a variety of computer system readable media. Such media may be any available media that is accessible by computer system/server 900, and it includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.
System memory 904 can include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 908 and/or cache memory 910. Computer system/server 900 may further include other removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer system storage media. By way of example only, storage system 912 can be provided for reading from and writing to a non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media (not shown and typically called a “hard drive”). Although not shown, a magnetic disk drive for reading from and writing to a removable, non-volatile magnetic disk (e.g., a “floppy disk”), and an optical disk drive for reading from or writing to a removable, non-volatile optical disk such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM or other optical media can be provided. In such instances, each can be connected to bus 906 by one or more data media interfaces. As will be further depicted and described below, memory 904 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules that are configured to carry out the functions of embodiments of the invention.
Program/utility 914, having a set (at least one) of program modules 916, may be stored in memory 904 by way of example, and not limitation, as well as an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data. Each of the operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data or some combination thereof, may include an implementation of a networking environment. The components of the server 102 and client 104 may be implemented as program modules 916 which generally carry out the functions and/or methodologies of embodiments of the invention as described herein. The content analyzer 112 may be implemented in one or more computer systems 900, where if implemented in multiple computer systems 900, then the computer systems may communicate over a network.
Computer system/server 900 may also communicate with one or more external devices 918 such as a keyboard, a pointing device, a display 920, etc.; one or more devices that enable a user to interact with computer system/server 900; and/or any devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.) that enable computer system/server 900 to communicate with one or more other computing devices. Such communication can occur via Input/Output (I/O) interfaces 922. Still yet, computer system/server 900 can communicate with one or more networks such as a local area network (LAN), a general wide area network (WAN), and/or a public network (e.g., the Internet) via network adapter 924. As depicted, network adapter 924 communicates with the other components of computer system/server 900 via bus 906. It should be understood that although not shown, other hardware and/or software components could be used in conjunction with computer system/server 900. Examples, include, but are not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data archival storage systems, etc.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, fragment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The foregoing description of various embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto. The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims herein after appended.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/840,952, filed Mar. 15, 2013, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5999925 | Evans | Dec 1999 | A |
7490087 | Kumashio | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7965894 | Tian et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979413 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8010538 | Pedersen | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8156092 | Hewett et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8239750 | Thomsen | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20040001606 | Levy | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040098405 | Zrubek et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050071743 | Harrington | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050154761 | Lee | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060074871 | Meyerzon | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060101285 | Chen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101328 | Albornoz | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122983 | King et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149706 | Prang | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060259854 | Walker | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070011134 | Langseth et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011183 | Langseth et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022374 | Huang | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055926 | Christiansen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070271340 | Goodman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080040388 | Petri et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080115083 | Finkelstein | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140679 | Deyo et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080307228 | Faria | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090164427 | Shields et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090313226 | Bennett | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322756 | Robertson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110029491 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110078165 | Battle | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110138269 | Cordonnier | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110271232 | Crochet et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110296291 | Melkinov | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120117080 | Lamanna | May 2012 | A1 |
20130232160 | Tibble | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130235084 | Wu | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140074843 | White | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089773 | Eames | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140189526 | Chen | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140229874 | Strauss | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0629972 | Dec 1994 | EP |
1739951 | Jan 2007 | EP |
2011109637 | Jun 2011 | JP |
Entry |
---|
English Abstract for JP2011109637A, published on Jun. 2, 2011, Total 2 pp. [Includes English Counterpart U.S. Pat. No. 7,965,894.]. |
Heintze, N., “Koala Document Fingerprinting (KDF)”, [online], [Retrieved on Feb. 6, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet at <URL: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/user/nch/www/koala-info.html>, 1995 Nevin Heintze, Total 2 pp. |
Heintze, N., “Scalable Document Fingerprinting (1996)”, [online], [Retrieved on Feb. 6, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet at <URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.38.8072>, Proceedings of the Usenix Workshop on Electronic Commerce, 1996, Total 2 pp. |
Heintze, N., “Scalable Document Fingerprinting (Extended Abstract)”, 1995, Total 10 pp. |
Krishnamurthy, B., S. Kumar, A. Sharma, and L. Subramanian, “Detecting Bulk Document Leakage”, Download date: Feb. 6, 2013, Total 13 pp. |
US Patent Application, dated Mar. 15, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,952 (54.105), filed Mar. 15, 2013, entitled “Determining Linkage Metadata of Content of a Target Document to Source Documents”, invented by Brian P. Byrne et al., Total 32 pages. |
Preliminary Amendment, dated Sep. 22, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,952 (54.105), filed Mar. 15, 2013, entitled “Determining Linkage Metadata of Content of a Target Document to Source Documents”, invented by Brian P. Byrne et al., Total 16 pages. |
Response to Office Action, dated Aug. 28, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,952 (54.105), filed Mar. 15, 2013, invented by Brian P. Byrne et al., Total 11 pages. |
Final Office Action, dated Sep. 22, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,952 (54.105), filed Mar. 15, 2013, invented by Brian P. Byrne et al., Total 37 pages. |
Response to Final Office Action, dated Dec. 8, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,952 (54.105), filed Mar. 15, 2013, invented by Brian P. Byrne et al., Total 11 pages. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 11, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,952 (54.105), filed Mar. 15, 2013, invented by Brian P. Byrne et al., Total 26 pages. |
Office Action, dated May 28, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,952 (54.105), filed Mar. 15, 2013, invented by Brian P. Byrne et al., Total 30 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 21, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,952, filed Mar. 15, 2013, invented by Brian P. Byrne et al., Total 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150095361 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13840952 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14493132 | US |