Determining pickup and destination locations for autonomous vehicles

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11333507
  • Patent Number
    11,333,507
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 29, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 17, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
Aspects of the disclosure provide systems and methods for providing suggested locations for pick up and destination locations. Pick up locations may include locations where an autonomous vehicle can pick up a passenger, while destination locations may include locations where the vehicle can wait for an additional passenger, stop and wait for a passenger to perform some task and return to the vehicle, or for the vehicle to drop off a passenger. As such, a request for a vehicle may be received from a client computing device. The request may identify a first location. A set of one or more suggested locations may be selected by comparing the predetermined locations to the first location. The set may be provided to the client computing device.
Description
BACKGROUND

Autonomous vehicles, such as vehicles that do not require a human driver, can be used to aid in the transport of passengers or items from one location to another. Such vehicles may operate in a fully autonomous mode where passengers may provide some initial input, such as a pick up or destination location, and the vehicle maneuvers itself to that location.


BRIEF SUMMARY

One aspect of the disclosure provides a system. The system may include memory storing detailed map information identifying a plurality of predetermined locations where a vehicle is able to pick up or drop off passengers. The system may also include one or more server computers each having one or more processors. The one or more server computers may be configured to: receive a request from a client computing device, the request identifying a first location; select a set of one or more suggested locations by comparing the predetermined locations to the first location; and provide the set of one or more suggested locations to the client computing device.


In one example, the one or more server computers are configured to select the set of one or more suggested locations by determining whether the first location corresponds to a predetermined location, and when the first location corresponds to the predetermined location, including the predetermined location in the set. In another example, the one or more server computers are configured to select the set of one or more suggested locations by identifying predetermined locations of the plurality of predetermined location that are within a threshold distance of the first location. In another example, the threshold distance is defined as a walking distance. Alternatively, the threshold distance is defined as a radial distance. In addition, the one or more server computers are configured to select the set of one or more suggested locations by scoring each given one of the identified predetermined locations based on a first plurality of factors related to the difficulty in a person reaching that given one of the identified predetermined locations from the first location and the set of one or more suggested locations is also selected based upon the scoring of the identified predetermined locations.


In another example, the one or more server computers are configured to conduct the scoring of each given one of the identified predetermined locations also based on a second plurality of factors related to the difficulty in an autonomous vehicle reaching and stopping at that given one of the identified predetermined locations. In this example, the one or more server computers are also configured to determine at least one of the second plurality of factors based on a current location of the autonomous vehicle. In another example, the one or more server computers are configured to select the set of one or more suggested locations by identifying a set number of predetermined locations of the plurality of predetermined locations that are within a threshold distance of the first location and closest to the first location. In this example, the system also includes one or more autonomous vehicles, and wherein the one or more server computers are also configured to receive, from the client computing device, a selection of a suggested location of the set of one or more suggested locations and dispatch a vehicle of the one or more autonomous vehicles to the selected suggested location. In another example, the first location is a destination location and the one or more server computing devices are also configured to receive, from the client computing device, information confirming the first location as the destination location and provide instructions to a vehicle to drop off a passenger at the first location. In another example, the first location is a pick up location and the one or more server computing devices are also configured to receive, from the client computing device, information confirming the first location as the pickup location and dispatch a vehicle to the first location.


Another aspect of the disclosure provides a computer-implemented method. The method includes accessing, by one or more processors of one or more server computing devices, detailed map information identifying a plurality of predetermined locations where a vehicle is able to pick up or drop off passengers; receiving, by the one or more processors, a request from a client computing device, the request identifying a first location; selecting, by the one or more processors, a set of one or more suggested locations by comparing the predetermined locations to the first location and identifying predetermined locations of the plurality of predetermined locations that are within a threshold distance of the first location and closest to the first location; and providing, by the one or more processors, the set of one or more suggested locations to the client computing device.


In one example, selecting the set of one or more suggested locations includes determining whether the first location corresponds to a predetermined location, and when the first location corresponds to the predetermined location, including the predetermined location in the set. In another example, selecting the set includes selecting a predetermined number of predetermined locations of the plurality of predetermined locations that are within a threshold distance of the first location and closest to the first location. In this example, the threshold distance is defined as a walking distance. Alternatively, the threshold distance is defined as a radial distance. In addition, selecting the set of one or more suggested locations includes scoring each given one of the identified predetermined locations based on a first plurality of factors related to the difficulty in a person reaching that given one of the identified predetermined locations from the first location and using the scoring of the identified predetermined locations to select the set of one or more suggested locations. In this example, the scoring of each given one of the identified predetermined locations is conducted based on a second plurality of factors related to the difficulty in an autonomous vehicle reaching and stopping at that given one of the identified predetermined locations.


A further aspect of the disclosure provides a non-transitory, tangible, computer readable medium on which instructions are stored. The instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform a method. The method includes accessing detailed map information identifying a plurality of predetermined locations where a vehicle is able to pick up or drop off passengers; receiving a request from a client computing device, the request identifying a first location; selecting a set of one or more suggested locations by comparing the predetermined locations to the first location; scoring given ones of the plurality predetermined locations based on a first plurality of factors related to the difficulty in a person reaching a respective given one of the identified predetermined locations from the first location; providing the set of one or more suggested locations to the client computing device; and provide instructions to a vehicle to drop off a passenger at the first location.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a pictorial diagram of an example system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.



FIG. 2 is a functional diagram of the system of FIG. 1 in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.



FIG. 3 is an example of detailed map information in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.



FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C are example client devices and screen shots in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.



FIG. 5 is another example of detailed map information and requested pickup location in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.



FIG. 6 is another example client device and screen shot in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.



FIG. 7 is an example of detailed map information and data in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.



FIG. 8 is another example of detailed map information and data in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.



FIG. 9 is a further example of detailed map information and data in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.



FIG. 10A is an example of detailed map information and data in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.



FIG. 10B is an example client device and screen shot in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.



FIG. 11 is another example of detailed map information and data in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.



FIG. 12 is an example flow diagram in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Overview


The technology relates to an autonomous vehicle service for maneuvering a user or passenger to a destination, for example taking a trip, autonomously. In order to do so, the user may provide a pickup location and one or more destination locations for the trip to a centralized dispatching system via a client computing device, such as a mobile phone. However, not all locations may be accessible or safe for a passenger pick up, for the vehicle to stop and wait for a passenger to perform some task and return to the vehicle, or for the vehicle to drop off a passenger. For example, autonomous vehicles may not be able to drive everywhere a human driven vehicle can. In addition, road conditions such as construction, emergency services activity, and speed limits (some may be too high for autonomous driving or picking up or dropping off passengers) can pose complications for autonomous vehicles and safety issues for picking up or dropping off passengers. To address this, when provided with a location, the centralized dispatching system may provide a set of one or more suggested locations corresponding to locations that an autonomous vehicle can pick up a passenger (pickup location) or locations where the vehicle can wait for an additional passenger, stop and wait for a passenger to perform some task and return to the vehicle, or for the vehicle to drop off a passenger (destination location). These suggested locations may include those provided by the user and/or convenient nearby locations. Thus, the features described herein may provide for increases in the availability, safety, and usefulness of the services of autonomous vehicles.


Pick up and destination locations may be identified in various ways. As an example, the pickup location can be defaulted to current location of the user's client computing device, but may also be a recent or saved location near the current location associated with the user's account. The user may enter an address or other location information, tap a location on a map, or select a location from a list in order to identify a pickup and/or destination location. The user's client computing device may send the location or locations to one or more server computing devices of the centralized dispatching system.


In order to provide suggestion in response, the one or more server computing devices may access detailed map information. The detailed map information may include information about roads, buildings, elevations, fire hydrants, construction zones, real time traffic conditions, etc. from various sources such as governmental institutions, paid informational services, manually entered information, information gathered and provided in real time by autonomous vehicles, etc. The detailed map information may also include information identifying predetermined locations where an autonomous vehicle can stop to pick up or drop off a passenger. These predetermined locations may include reasonable locations where a vehicle could stop selected manually or through some analysis of the characteristics of each location. The predetermined locations may also be limited to locations within a service area of the autonomous vehicle service.


Once a pickup or destination location is received, the one or more server computing devices may access the detailed map information to determine whether the received location corresponds to one of the predetermined locations. If so, the one or more server computing devices may determine that the received location is in fact reachable.


The one or more server computing devices may then provide a notification to the client computing device including a suggested location corresponding to the received location. The user may then approve or select the returned suggested location as a pick up or destination location and initiate (or continue as the case may be) a trip. If the location is a pickup location, the server may then dispatch a vehicle to the selected location to pick up the user for a trip.


When the received location does not correspond to one of the predetermined locations, the one or more server computing devices may use the detailed map information to identify a set of predetermined locations within a threshold distance of the received location. The threshold distance may be defined as a predetermined radial or walking distance from the received location and may also be adjusted by a user. For example, a default threshold distance may be 500 feet, or more or less, radially or in walking distance from a particular location. A user may then use his or her client computing device to adjust this value up or down and any adjustments may be provided to the one or more server computing devices by the user's client computing device.


For example, this set may include all of the predetermined locations within the threshold distance, or the one or more predetermined locations up to a maximum, within the threshold distance, that are closest to the received location. This set may then be provided to the client computing devices as a set of suggested locations for the user. In some examples, the set may be empty and the user provided with a notification that the received location is unavailable.


In one example, rather than returning all of the predetermined locations in the set, one or more predetermined locations may be selected for and returned as a set of suggested locations to the user. For example, each predetermined location within the set may be scored using various factors and the one or more highest (or lowest depending upon scale) scoring locations may be returned as suggested locations to the user.


In addition, as discussed in detail below, the features described herein allow for various alternatives.


Example Systems

As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, a system 100 in accordance with one aspect of the disclosure includes various components such as vehicles 100A and 100B. While certain aspects of the disclosure are particularly useful in connection with specific types of vehicles, the vehicle may be any type of vehicle including, but not limited to, cars, trucks, motorcycles, busses, recreational vehicles, etc. The vehicles may have one or more computing devices, such as computing device 101 (shown in FIG. 2) containing one or more processors 102, memory 104, data 108, instructions 106 and other components typically present in vehicles having an autonomous driving mode. In this regard, computing device 101 may be an autonomous driving system that can control aspects of vehicle 100A in order to maneuver vehicle 100A for example, between pickup and destination locations. In addition vehicle 100B may be configured the same or similarly to vehicle 100A.


The memory 104 stores information accessible by the one or more processors 102, including instructions 106 and data 108 that may be executed or otherwise used by the processor 102. The memory 104 may be of any type capable of storing information accessible by the processor, including a computing device-readable medium, or other medium that stores data that may be read with the aid of an electronic device, such as a hard-drive, memory card, ROM, RAM, DVD or other optical disks, as well as other write-capable and read-only memories. Systems and methods may include different combinations of the foregoing, whereby different portions of the instructions and data are stored on different types of media.


The instructions 106 may be any set of instructions to be executed directly (such as machine code) or indirectly (such as scripts) by the processor. For example, the instructions may be stored as computing device code on the computing device-readable medium. In that regard, the terms “instructions” and “programs” may be used interchangeably herein. The instructions may be stored in object code format for direct processing by the processor, or in any other computing device language including scripts or collections of independent source code modules that are interpreted on demand or compiled in advance. Functions, methods and routines of the instructions are explained in more detail below.


The data 108 may be retrieved, stored or modified by processor 102 in accordance with the instructions 106. For instance, although the claimed subject matter is not limited by any particular data structure, the data may be stored in computing device registers, in a relational database as a table having a plurality of different fields and records, XML documents or flat files. The data may also be formatted in any computing device-readable format.


The one or more processor 102 may be any conventional processors, such as commercially available CPUs. Alternatively, the one or more processors may be a dedicated device such as an ASIC or other hardware-based processor. Although FIG. 2 functionally illustrates the processor, memory, and other elements of the vehicle's computing device 101 as being within the same block, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the processor, computing device, or memory may actually include multiple processors, computing devices, or memories that may or may not be stored within the same physical housing. For example, memory may be a hard drive or other storage media located in a housing different from that of computing device 101. Accordingly, references to a processor or computing device will be understood to include references to a collection of processors or computing devices or memories that may or may not operate in parallel.


Computing device 101 may include all of the components normally used in connection with a computing device such as the processor and memory described above as well as a user input (e.g., a mouse, keyboard, touch screen and/or microphone) and various electronic displays (e.g., a monitor having a screen or any other electrical device that is operable to display information). In this example, the vehicle includes an internal electronic display as well as one or more speakers to provide information or audio visual experiences. In this regard, an internal electronic display may be located within a cabin of vehicle 100A and may be used by computing device 101 to provide information to passengers within the vehicle 100A.


Computing device 101 may also include one or more wireless network connections to facilitate communication with other computing devices, such as the client computing devices and server computing devices described in detail below. The wireless network connections may include short range communication protocols such as Bluetooth, Bluetooth low energy (LE), cellular connections, as well as various configurations and protocols including the Internet, World Wide Web, intranets, virtual private networks, wide area networks, local networks, private networks using communication protocols proprietary to one or more companies, Ethernet, WiFi and HTTP, and various combinations of the foregoing.


Computing device 101 of vehicle 100A may also receive or transfer information to and from other computing devices. In this regard, system 100 also includes a plurality of computing devices 110, 120, 130, 140 and a storage system 150 connected via a network 160. As noted above, system 100 also includes vehicle 100B, which may be configured similarly to vehicle 100. Although only a few vehicles and computing devices are depicted for simplicity, a typical system may include significantly more.


As shown in FIG. 2, each of computing devices 110, 120, 130, 140 may include one or more processors, memory, data and instructions. Such processors, memories, data and instructions may be configured similarly to one or more processors 102, memory 104, data 108, and instructions 106 of computing device 101.


The network 160, and intervening nodes, may include various configurations and protocols including short range communication protocols such as Bluetooth, Bluetooth LE, the Internet, World Wide Web, intranets, virtual private networks, wide area networks, local networks, private networks using communication protocols proprietary to one or more companies, Ethernet, WiFi and HTTP, and various combinations of the foregoing. Such communication may be facilitated by any device capable of transmitting data to and from other computing devices, such as modems and wireless interfaces.


In one example, one or more computing devices 110 may include a server having a plurality of computing devices, e.g., a load balanced server farm, that exchange information with different nodes of a network for the purpose of receiving, processing and transmitting the data to and from other computing devices. For instance, one or more computing devices 110 may include one or more server computing devices that are capable of communicating with computing device 101 of vehicle 100A or a similar computing device of vehicle 100B as well as computing devices 120, 130, 140 via the network 160. For example, vehicles 100A and 100B may be a part of a fleet of vehicles that can be dispatched by server computing devices to various locations. In this regard, the vehicles of the fleet may periodically send the server computing devices location information provided by the vehicle's respective positioning systems and the one or more server computing devices may track the locations of the vehicles.


In addition, server computing devices 110 may use network 160 to transmit and present information to a user, such as user 122, 132, 142 (shown in FIG. 1) on a display, such as displays 114, 134, 144 of computing devices 120, 130, 140. In this regard, computing devices 120, 130, 140 may be considered client computing devices.


As shown in FIG. 1, each client computing device 120, 130, 140 may be a personal computing device intended for use by a user 122, 132, 142, and have all of the components normally used in connection with a personal computing device including one or more processors (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU)), memory (e.g., RAM and internal hard drives) storing data and instructions, a display such as displays 114, 134, 144 (e.g., a monitor having a screen, a touch-screen, a projector, a television, or other device that is operable to display information), and user input devices 116, 136, 146 (e.g., a mouse, keyboard, touch-screen or microphone). The client computing devices may also include a camera for recording video streams, speakers, a network interface device, and all of the components used for connecting these elements to one another.


In addition, the client computing devices 120 and 130 may also include components 128 and 138 for determining the position and orientation of client computing devices. For example, these components may include a GPS receiver to determine the device's latitude, longitude and/or altitude as well as an accelerometer, gyroscope or another direction/speed detection device.


Although the client computing devices 120, 130, and 140 may each comprise a full-sized personal computing device, they may alternatively comprise mobile computing devices capable of wirelessly exchanging data with a server over a network such as the Internet. By way of example only, client computing device 120 may be a mobile phone or a device such as a wireless-enabled PDA, a tablet PC, a wearable computing device or system, or a netbook that is capable of obtaining information via the Internet or other networks. In another example, client computing device 130 may be a wearable computing system, shown as a head-mounted computing system in FIG. 1. As an example the user may input information using a small keyboard, a keypad, microphone, using visual signals with a camera, or a touch screen.


In some examples, client computing device 140 may be a concierge work station used by an administrator to provide concierge services to users such as users 122 and 132. For example, a concierge 142 may use the concierge work station 140 to communicate via a telephone call or audio connection with users through their respective client computing devices or vehicles 100A or 100B in order to facilitate the safe operation of vehicles 100A and 100B and the safety of the users as described in further detail below. Although only a single concierge work station 140 is shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, any number of such work stations may be included in a typical system.


Storage system 150 may store various types of information as described in more detail below. This information may be retrieved or otherwise accessed by a server computing device, such as one or more server computing devices 110, in order to perform some or all of the features described herein. For example, the information may include routing data for generating and evaluating routes between locations. For example, the routing information may be used to estimate how long it would take a vehicle at a first location to reach a second location. In this regard, the routing information may include map information including roads, as well as information about roads such as direction (one way, two way, etc.), orientation (North, South, etc.), speed limits, as well as traffic information identifying expected traffic conditions, etc. The map information may also include buildings, elevations, fire hydrants, construction zones, real time traffic conditions, etc. from various sources such as governmental institutions, paid informational services, manually entered information, information gathered and provided in real time by autonomous vehicles, etc.


In some instances, the map information may include information identifying areas which have been preselected or preapproved for an autonomous vehicle to pick up a passenger (pickup location) or locations where the vehicle can wait for an additional passenger, stop and wait for a passenger to perform some task and return to the vehicle, or for the vehicle to drop off a passenger (destination location). For example, FIG. 3 is an example of map information 300 including a plurality of buildings 302-06 as well roadways 310-14. Map information 300 also include a number of points 320-326 identifying predetermined locations where an autonomous vehicle can park, stop and wait, load and unload passengers, etc. The predetermined locations may be manually selected or identified based on characteristics of such locations (sizes, shapes, parking and other laws, etc.) and, in some cases, manually verified. These predetermined locations may thus include reasonable locations where a vehicle could stop selected manually or through some analysis of the characteristics of each location. The predetermined locations may also be limited to locations within a service area of the autonomous vehicle service.


As with memory 104, storage system 150 can be of any type of computerized storage capable of storing information accessible by the server computing devices 110, such as a hard-drive, memory card, ROM, RAM, DVD, CD-ROM, write-capable, and read-only memories. In addition, storage system 150 may include a distributed storage system where data is stored on a plurality of different storage devices which may be physically located at the same or different geographic locations. Storage system 150 may be connected to the computing devices via the network 160 as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 and/or may be directly connected to or incorporated into any of the computing devices 110, 120, 130, 140, etc.


In addition to the operations described above and illustrated in the figures, various operations will now be described. It should be understood that the following operations do not have to be performed in the precise order described below. Rather, various steps can be handled in a different order or simultaneously, and steps may also be added or omitted.


In one aspect, a user may download an application for requesting a vehicle to a client computing device. For example, users 122 and 132 may download the application via a link in an email, directly from a website, or an application store to client computing devices 120 and 130. For example, client computing device may transmit a request for the application over the network, for example, to one or more server computing devices 110, and in response, receive the application. The application may be installed locally at the client computing device.


The user may then use his or her client computing device to access the application and request a vehicle. As an example, a user such as user 132 may use client computing device 130 to send a request to one or more server computing devices 110 for a vehicle. As part of this, the user may identify a pickup location, a destination location, and, in some cases, one or more intermediate stopping locations anywhere within a service area where a vehicle can stop.


These pickup and destination locations may be predefined (e.g., specific areas of a parking lot, etc.) or may simply be any location within a service area of the vehicles. As an example, a pickup location can be defaulted to current location of the user's client computing device, or can be input by the user at the user's client device. For instance, the user may enter an address or other location information or select a location on a map to select a pickup location. As shown in FIG. 4A, user 122 may use his or her finger 422 to tap on a map 424 displayed on the display 114 of client computing device 120. In response, as shown in FIG. 4B, the location of the tap on the map, displayed as map marker 426, may be identified as a requested location. Allowing the user to input or select a location may be especially helpful where the user is not currently located at the pickup location but will be by the time the vehicle arrives.


In the example of FIG. 4C, a user is provided with a plurality of options for inputting locations. As shown, the user is able to select from a series of saved locations under a saved option 430 previously saved by the user as discussed above. The user may also be provided with option 440 which provide the user with the ability to view a list of recent locations. By selecting option 450, the user may be able to conduct a location search. For example, a user may enter a search query (“fast food restaurant” or “doctor doe” or “gas station near me”) and receive a set of locations corresponding to the search query as with a typical map or location-based search engine.


Once the user has selected one or more of a pickup and/or destination locations, the user's client computing device may send the location or locations to one or more server computing devices of the centralized dispatching system. In response, the one or more server computing devices may provide one or more suggested locations corresponding to each received location.


In order to provide a suggested location in response to a received location, the one or more server computing devices may access the map information of storage system 150 to determine whether the received location corresponds to one of the predetermined locations for picking up or dropping off passengers. If so, the one or more server computing devices may determine that the received location is in fact reachable. For example, as shown in example 500 of FIG. 5, the location of map marker 426 on map 426 corresponds to the location of map marker 526 in FIG. 5. This location also at least partially overlaps with or is the same as the location of point 326. In this regard, the location of map marker 426 (and the finger tap of FIG. 4A) corresponds to the predetermined location of point 326.


When a requested location does correspond to one of the predetermined locations, the one or more server computing devices may provide a notification to the client computing device including a suggested location corresponding to the received location. For example, in response to receiving the location of map marker 426 and determining that this received location corresponds to the predetermined location of point 326, the one or more server computing devices 110 provide a notification to client computing device 120 suggesting the location of map marker 426 as a suggested location for a passenger pickup or destination location, depending upon the nature of the requested location. As shown in FIG. 6, map marker 426 is now highlighted to indicate that the location of map marker 426 is a suggested location returned from the one or more server computing devices 110. The user may then select the returned suggested location as a pick up or destination location. If the location is a pickup location, the server may then dispatch a vehicle, such as vehicle 100A or vehicle 100B, to the selected location to pick up the user for a trip. If the location is a destination location, the server may provide the selected location to the vehicle, with instructions to maneuver the vehicle to the selected location with the passenger and drop off a passenger or wait as the case may be.


When the received location does not correspond to one of the predetermined locations, the one or more server computing devices may use the detailed map information to identify one or more other suggested locations. This set of suggested locations may then be provided to the client computing device that sent the received location.


For example, the one or more server computing devices 110 may identify set of predetermined locations within a threshold distance of the received location. The threshold distance may be defined as a predetermined radial distance from the received location and may also be adjusted (increased or decreased) by a user, for example, by providing the one or more server computing devices 110 with a user preference. For example, a user may then use his or her client computing device to adjust this value up or down and any adjustments may be provided to the one or more server computing devices by the user's client computing device.


In one example, a default threshold distance may be 500 feet, or more or less, radially or in walking distance from a received location. In other words, the threshold may be used to draw an area around a received location from a client computing device and identify the set or suggested locations. For example, as shown in FIG. 7, map marker 710 identifies a received location from a client computing device. Area 720 may define areas that are within a 500 foot walking distance of map marker 710. In some instances, this area may be limited to areas within a roadway where a vehicle can actually travel. Thus, point 326 may be included in the set of suggested locations while points 320-24 are not.


As shown in example 800 of FIG. 8, map marker 810 identifies a received location from a client computing device. The one or more server computing devices 110 may then identify a set of suggested locations including any predetermined locations within radius 820 of map marker 810 or any predetermined locations within circle 830. In FIG. 8, points having locations within the set of suggested locations are shown as darkened circles and those not included have only a dark outline. Thus, points 322, 324, and 326 are identified as being within circle 830 while point 320 is not.


The set of suggested locations may include all of the predetermined locations within the threshold distance, as shown in FIGS. 7 and 8. Alternatively, the set may include one or more predetermined locations that are closest to the received location, up to some maximum value, such as 3 or more or less, within the threshold distance. For example, as shown in FIG. 9, points having locations within the set of suggested locations are shown as darkened circles and those not included have only a dark outline. Thus, while radius 820 and circle 830 identify a plurality of points, points 322 and 324 are not ones of the 3 closest to the map marker 810. In this regard, the locations of points 322 and 324 may be filtered from or not included in the set of suggested locations. At the same time, the location of point 326 is one of the 3 closest points to map marker 810. Thus, the location of point 326 may be included in the set of suggested locations.


The set of suggested locations may then be provided to the client computing devices. As with the example above, a user may then select or reject any suggested location as either a pick up or destination location, depending upon the nature of the received location. If the location is a pickup location, the server may then dispatch a vehicle, such as vehicle 100A or vehicle 100B, to the selected location to pick up the user for a trip. If the location is a destination location, the server may provide the selected location to the vehicle, with instructions to maneuver the vehicle to the selected location with the passenger and drop off a passenger or wait as the case may be.


In some examples, the set of suggested locations may be empty, so the one or more server computing devices do not have any suggested locations to provide in response to a received location from a client computing device. For example, as shown in FIG. 10A, there are no points within radius 1010 or circle 1020 of the location of map marker 1030 corresponding to a received location. Thus, the set of suggested locations is empty.


Rather than simply sending the empty set of suggested locations to the client computing device, the one or more server computing device 110 may provide the client computing device with a notification indicating that the received location is not available. FIG. 10B is an example of a notification 1040 received by the client computing device 120 and displayed on the display 114 to indicate that a received location is unavailable.


In one example, rather than returning all of the predetermined locations in the set, one or more predetermined locations may be selected for and returned as a set of suggested locations to the user. For example, each predetermined location within the set may be scored using various factors and the one or more highest (or lowest depending upon scale) scoring locations may be returned as suggested locations to the user.


The scoring may be based on various factors that quantify the ease and/or difficulty of reaching the predetermined location by one or both of an autonomous vehicle and the user. Factors related to an autonomous vehicle may include, for example, the location of any autonomous vehicles available to pick up the user (if a pickup location), whether the vehicle would have to first pass the location (on the opposite side of the street) and turn around, whether the autonomous vehicle can currently reach the predetermined location (because access is temporarily prevented due to traffic or construction conditions), the availability of parking or places to pull over and wait at the predetermined location, as well as any other such factors. Factors related to the user may include, for example, the distance from the received location to the predetermined location, the availability and size of sidewalks, the presence and grade of hills, the number and size of roads that would need to be crossed from the received location to the predetermined location, or any other characteristics of roads that would affect the ease of walking to the suggested location. In one instance, each factor may be individually scored for a given predetermined location and the scores summed to provide an overall score for that given predetermined location.


The scoring may be especially useful situations in which a predetermined location very close to the received location is somehow less desirable than another predetermined location farther away. For example, if a predetermined location on one side of a highway is closer in distance to a received location, but because of the difficulty involved in walking there from the received location, the scoring may identify another predetermined location that is farther away from the received location but easier to reach by walking.


For example, FIG. 11 is an example 1100 of map information 1110 including a plurality of points 1120-1126 identifying predetermined locations as discussed above. Map marker 1130 represents a received location from a client computing device. Radius 1140 and circle 1150 represent a threshold distance from the location of map marker 1130 that identify point 1120 and 1122 as being within a set of suggested locations. Each of points 1120 and 1122 may be scored. In one example, although point 1122 is farther away from the location of map marker 1130 than point 1120, point 1122 may have a higher score than point 1120. For instance, point 1120 may require a person to cross road 1160 which may be a highway or typically busy area in terms of traffic, whereas point 1122, though farther away from map marker 1130 does not require a person to cross any roads and is on the same side of road 1162 as the location of map marker 1130.


In an alternative, rather than returning a received location as a suggested location if the received location corresponds to a predetermined location, the one or more server computing devices may simply include the predetermined location that corresponds to the received location in a set of predetermined locations (the rest of the predetermined locations in the set being determined using a threshold distance as described above). In this example, the received location may be scored along with the other predetermined locations in the set in order to select the best location or locations to provide as suggestions to a user as discussed above.


Although the examples discussed above relate to a user initiating a trip by providing a pick up and one or more destination locations, the features described above may be used to identify and suggest destination locations for a dropping off of a user during a trip. This may be especially useful where a problem arises with a destination location which was previously approved by a user. In one example, the problem may be that the vehicle is no longer able to reach the destination location. This information may be provided to the vehicle's computing device by way of traffic condition updates received, for example, from the one or more server computing device or a traffic condition service.


In another example, if there is some type of hazard at the destination location where the vehicle would drop off a user, the features described above may be used to provide a user with an alternative destination to drop off the user. Hazards may include pot holes, puddles, slippery ground, objects on top of the ground that would make for uneven footing, cracks in the pavement, uneven ground, high curbs, storm drains, broken glass, etc. For example, various sensors of the vehicle, including lasers, radar, sonar, etc., may provide data regarding the ground next to the vehicle. This data may be used to detect any hazards near the vehicle, using computer vision algorithms and the computing device 101. If a hazard is detected the user may be provided with a new suggested destination or destinations. This new suggested destination may be selected as discussed above by the vehicle's computing device 101 or by the vehicle's computing device 101 requesting such information from the one or more server computing devices 110.


In addition to or instead of providing a new suggested destination or destinations, the vehicle may provide the user with an alert to warn him or her of the hazard. Alerts may take any number of forms including displaying a message on an internal screen, an audible message from a speaker inside of the vehicle, or a notification sent to a smart phone program being used to interact with the vehicle.


As discussed above, the number of suggested locations provided to the user may be a default value such as zero or one or more or less. Alternatively, the number of suggested locations may be set by a user and provided to the one or more server computing devices. In yet another alternative, the number of suggested locations provided may be determined by selecting any of the predetermined locations of the set having at least a particular score.



FIG. 12 is an example flow diagram 1200 in accordance with some of the aspects described above that may be performed by one or more computing devices such as the one or more server computing devices 110. For example, at block 1210, a request for a vehicle is received from a client computing device, wherein the request identifies a first location. Memory storing detailed map information identifying a plurality of predetermined locations where a vehicle is able to pick up or drop off passengers is accessed at block 1220. Predetermined locations of the plurality of predetermined locations that are within a threshold distance of the first location are determined at block 1230. Each given one of the identified predetermined locations is scored based on a first plurality of factors at block 1240. The plurality of factors are related to the difficulty in a person reaching that given one of the identified predetermined locations from the first location and on a second plurality of factors related to the difficulty in an autonomous vehicle reaching and stopping at that given one of the identified predetermined locations. A set of one or more suggested locations is selected based upon the scoring of the identified predetermined locations at block 1250. The set of one or more suggested locations is provided to the client computing device at block 1260. A selection of a suggested location of the set of one or more suggested locations is received at block 1270. A vehicle of the one or more autonomous vehicles is dispatched to the selected suggested location at block 1280.


Unless otherwise stated, the foregoing alternative examples are not mutually exclusive, but may be implemented in various combinations to achieve unique advantages. As these and other variations and combinations of the features discussed above can be utilized without departing from the subject matter defined by the claims, the foregoing description of the embodiments should be taken by way of illustration rather than by way of limitation of the subject matter defined by the claims. In addition, the provision of the examples described herein, as well as clauses phrased as “such as,” “including” and the like, should not be interpreted as limiting the subject matter of the claims to the specific examples; rather, the examples are intended to illustrate only one of many possible embodiments. Further, the same reference numbers in different drawings can identify the same or similar elements.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: memory storing a plurality of predetermined locations where a vehicle is able to pick up or drop off passengers; andone or more server computing devices each having one or more processors, the one or more server computing devices being configured to: receive a request from a client computing device, the request identifying a first location;identify a first predetermined location of the plurality of predetermined locations that is a first distance from the first location;identify a second predetermined location of the plurality of predetermined locations that is a second distance from the first location, the second distance being greater than the first distance; andscore by assigning a value to each of the first predetermined location and the second predetermined locations;select the second predetermined location as a suggested location based on the value for the first predetermined location and the value for the second predetermined location; andprovide the suggested location to the client computing device.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more server computing devices are configured to conduct the scoring based on a plurality of factors related to logistical constraints a person encounters in reaching the first predetermined location from the first location.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the one or more server computing devices are further configured to determine at least one of the plurality of factors based on a distance from the first location to the first predetermined location or the second predetermined location.
  • 4. The system of claim 2, wherein the one or more server computing devices are further configured to determine at least one of the plurality of factors based on walking conditions from the first location to the first predetermined location or the second predetermined location.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the walking conditions include whether there are hills.
  • 6. The system of claim 4, wherein the walking conditions include whether there are sidewalks.
  • 7. The system of claim 4, wherein the walking conditions include whether a road is crossed.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more server computing devices are configured to conduct the scoring based on a plurality of factors related to logistical constraints the vehicle encounters in reaching and stopping at the predetermined locations from the first location.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the one or more server computing devices are further configured to determine at least one of the plurality of factors based on a current location of the vehicle.
  • 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the one or more server computing devices are further configured to determine at least one of the plurality of factors based on whether the vehicle would have to first pass the first predetermined location or the second predetermined location and turn around.
  • 11. The system of claim 8, wherein the one or more server computing devices are further configured to determine at least one of the plurality of factors based on whether the vehicle would approach the first predetermined location or the second predetermined location from an opposite side of a road.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more server computing devices are further configured to identify the first predetermined location and the second predetermined location using a predetermined distance from the first location.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the predetermined distance is defined as a walking distance for a person.
  • 14. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more server computing devices are further configured to, prior to identifying the first predetermined location and prior to identifying the second predetermined location, determine that the first location is not one of the plurality of predetermined locations.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/196,194, filed Nov. 20, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/645,297, filed on Jul. 10, 2017, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,156,449, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/745,799, filed on Jun. 22, 2015, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,733,096 the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (121)
Number Name Date Kind
4361202 Minovitch Nov 1982 A
4465155 Collins Aug 1984 A
5293160 Kurozu et al. Mar 1994 A
5367456 Summerville et al. Nov 1994 A
5640323 Kleimenhagen et al. Jun 1997 A
6236333 King May 2001 B1
6298304 Theimer Oct 2001 B1
6356820 Hashimoto et al. Mar 2002 B1
6591172 Oda et al. Jul 2003 B2
6680675 Suzuki Jan 2004 B1
6963794 Geber et al. Nov 2005 B2
7113864 Smith et al. Sep 2006 B2
7859386 Lundkvist Dec 2010 B2
7928829 Hermann Apr 2011 B2
8044771 Nakajima et al. Oct 2011 B2
8078349 Prada Gomez et al. Dec 2011 B1
8126450 Howarter et al. Feb 2012 B2
8352112 Mudalige Jan 2013 B2
8494765 Konet et al. Jul 2013 B2
8532862 Neff Sep 2013 B2
8768565 Jefferies et al. Jan 2014 B2
8676427 Ferguson et al. Mar 2014 B1
8676430 Ferguson et al. Mar 2014 B1
8688306 Nemec et al. Apr 2014 B1
8718861 Montemerlo et al. May 2014 B1
8736438 Vasquez et al. May 2014 B1
8880270 Ferguson et al. Nov 2014 B1
8935034 Zhu et al. Jan 2015 B1
9060003 Wang et al. Jun 2015 B2
9191514 Cavanaugh et al. Nov 2015 B1
9304513 Ichikawa et al. Apr 2016 B2
9733096 Colijn et al. Aug 2017 B2
20040036622 Dukach et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040249569 Oh Dec 2004 A1
20040260470 Rast Dec 2004 A1
20050021227 Matsumoto et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050153707 Ledyard et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060253251 Puranik et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070073472 Odinak et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073552 Hileman Mar 2007 A1
20080061931 Hermann Mar 2008 A1
20080136674 Jang et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080195428 O'Sullivan Aug 2008 A1
20080266139 Kim Oct 2008 A1
20080312817 Kawauchi Dec 2008 A1
20090171566 Morimoto et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187538 Grun Jul 2009 A1
20090216600 Hill Aug 2009 A1
20090248231 Kamiya Oct 2009 A1
20090287367 Salinger Nov 2009 A1
20090327011 Petroff Dec 2009 A1
20100007525 Shanbhag et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017084 Riegel Jan 2010 A1
20100070168 Sumcad et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100106397 Van Apr 2010 A1
20100075656 Howarter et al. May 2010 A1
20100117585 Fitch et al. May 2010 A1
20100183409 Checketts et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100256836 Mudalige Oct 2010 A1
20100284771 Stierler Nov 2010 A1
20100286845 Rekow et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110099040 Felt et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110112969 Zaid et al. May 2011 A1
20110144865 Niemz Jun 2011 A1
20110144980 Rysenga Jun 2011 A1
20110191019 Holsinger et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110301985 Camp et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120041675 Juliver et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120072051 Koon Mar 2012 A1
20120083959 Dolgov et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120083960 Zhu et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120083964 Montemerlo et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120173080 Cluff Jul 2012 A1
20120188100 Min et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120232943 Myr Sep 2012 A1
20120271500 Tsimhoni et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130024049 Yoshioka et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130110342 Wuttke et al. May 2013 A1
20130231824 Wilson et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130238783 Alexander et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130289825 Noh et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130321178 Jameel et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140135598 Weidl et al. May 2014 A1
20140156182 Nemec et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172292 McGee et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172727 Abhyanker et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140189096 Miller et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140285361 Tippelhofer et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140297090 Ichinose Oct 2014 A1
20140365250 Ikeda et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140365913 Santamaria Dec 2014 A1
20140380424 Thompson Dec 2014 A1
20150073645 Davidsson et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150081362 Chadwick et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150127191 Misra et al. May 2015 A1
20150148989 Cooper et al. May 2015 A1
20150149320 Smirin May 2015 A1
20150185034 Abhyanker Jul 2015 A1
20150219464 Beaurepaire et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150321641 Abou Mahmoud et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150324708 Skipp et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150334187 Pesola et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150338849 Nemec et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150339928 Ramanujam Nov 2015 A1
20150369621 Abhyanker Dec 2015 A1
20150370251 Siegel et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160019790 Tobolski et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160027307 Abhyanker et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160042303 Medina et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160116293 Grover et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160125735 Tuukkanen May 2016 A1
20160148514 Iwami et al. May 2016 A1
20160170410 Ichikawa et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160203377 Irie et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160209848 Kojo et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160221495 Cunningham, III et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160301698 Katara et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160318518 Suzuki et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160327949 Wilson et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160349751 Sugimoto Dec 2016 A1
20170075358 Zhang Mar 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (32)
Number Date Country
101383089 Mar 2009 CN
101894462 Nov 2010 CN
101971116 Feb 2011 CN
102460535 May 2012 CN
102939230 Feb 2013 CN
103514739 Jan 2014 CN
104166663 Nov 2014 CN
102005049380 Apr 2007 DE
2573720 Mar 2013 EP
2629269 Aug 2013 EP
3362622 Jan 1997 JP
H10162291 Jun 1998 JP
3362622 Aug 1998 JP
10208195 Aug 1998 JP
H10207504 Aug 1998 JP
H10208195 Aug 1998 JP
H11184521 Jul 1999 JP
2001005524 Jan 2001 JP
2001234653 Aug 2001 JP
3362622 Jan 2003 JP
2006308390 Nov 2006 JP
2009014704 Jan 2009 JP
2011226441 Nov 2011 JP
2014019301 Feb 2014 JP
2014048047 Mar 2014 JP
2014092408 May 2014 JP
03080391 Oct 2003 WO
20110158347 Dec 2011 WO
2013117205 Aug 2013 WO
2014024254 Feb 2014 WO
2015117813 Aug 2015 WO
2015169204 Nov 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (47)
Entry
“Decision of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-563820, dated Jul. 2, 2018”, 8 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of official copy).
“Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Patent Application No. 2015263981 dated Aug. 25, 2017”, 7 pages.
“Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Patent Application No. 2016283946, dated Nov. 23, 2018”, 4 pages.
“Examination Report No. 2 for Australian Patent Application No. 2015263981 dated Nov. 8, 2017”, 8 pages.
“Examination Report No. 3 for Australian Patent Application No. 2015263981 dated Jan. 29, 2018”, 9 pages.
“Examination Report received for European Patent Application No. 15796123.6, dated Sep. 7, 2018”, 4 pages.
“Examination Report received for European Patent Application No. 18156156.4, dated Sep. 7, 2018”, 5 pages.
“Examiner's Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,947,995 dated Sep. 14, 2017”, 4 pages.
“Examiner's Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,947,995, dated Jun. 4, 2018”, 4 pages.
“Examiner's Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,990,016, dated Nov. 2, 2018”, 4 pages.
“Extended European Search Report for Application No. 16815024.1, dated Jan. 18, 2019”, 6 pages.
“Extended European Search Report received for European Patent Application No. 15796123.6, dated Mar. 8, 2018”, 6 pages.
“Extended European Search Report received for European Patent Application No. 18156156.4, dated Mar. 28, 2018”, 6 pages.
“Federal Transit Administration, Topic Guides on ADA Transportation—Topic Guide 6, On-Time Performance”, <http://dredf.org/ADA!g/OTP.shtml>, Jul. 2011, 50 pages.
“Federal Transit Administration, Topic Guides on ADA Transportation—Topic Guide 7, No. Shows”, <http://dredf.org/ADAtg/noshow.shtml>, Jul. 2011, 27 pages.
“First Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201580023657.2, dated Jul. 27, 2018”, 21 pages (13 pages of English Translation and 8 pages of Official copy).
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2016/035977 dated Jan. 4, 2018”, 10 pages.
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/032171, dated Dec. 8, 2016”, 12 pages.
“International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/035977 dated Sep. 29, 2016”, 12 pages.
“International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/032171, dated Sep. 17, 2015”, 13 pages.
“International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/032181, dated Sep. 4, 2015”, 12 pages.
“North Las Vegas—Code of Ordinance”, Available Online at <https:lllibrary.municode.com/nv/north_las_vegas/codes/code_of_ordinances/196159?nodeId= TIT1 OVETR_CH1 0.48STSTPAGE_1 0.48.180STPACULOZO>, May 21, 2013, 13 pages.
“Notice of Acceptance received for Australian Patent Application No. 2015263981, dated Apr. 30, 2018”, 3 pages.
“Notice of Preliminary Rejection for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2016-7030982, dated Apr. 30, 2018”, 13 pages (6 pages of English Translation and 7 pages of Official copy).
“Notice of Preliminary Rejection for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2016-7030982, dated Nov. 29, 2018”, 13 pages (6 pages of English Translation and 7 pages of Official copy).
“Notice of Reasons for Rejection received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-563820, dated Feb. 16, 2018”, 11 pages ( 6 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Official copy).
“Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-564890, dated Dec. 26, 2018”, 11 pages (6 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Official copy).
Baydere , et al., “MR 302: The Future of the Automobile: Car-Sharing Service using Autonomous Automobiles”, Spring 2014, 2014, pp. 1-10.
Bluetooth® Keyless , “FAQs about the Bluetooth® Passive Keyless Entry Module”, downloaded from <http://bluetoothkeyless.info/bluetooth-keyless-information/>, 2014, 3 pages.
Chevrolet , “OnStar Remote Link™: Control you Chevy even when you're not driving it”, Available online at <http://www.chevrolet.com/onstar-remotelink.html>, 2014, 2 pages.
Fagnant , et al., “The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios”, Transportation Research Part C, vol. 40, 2014, pp. 1-13 (The attached Reference includes 22 pages).
Goodwin, Antuan , “Add-on module auto-unlocks your car when your phone is near”, c|net, Available online at <http://www.cnet.com/news/add-on-module-auto-unlocks-your-car-when-your-phone-is-near/>, Nov. 19, 2013, 5 pages.
Jaffe, Eric , “The First Look at How Google's Self-Driving Car Handles City Streets—Citylab”, Available at <https jjwww.citylab.com/life/2014/04/first-lookhow-googles-self-driving-car -handles-city-streets/8977/>, Apr. 28, 2014, 1-18 pages.
Junqing Wei , et al., “Towards a viable autonomous driving research platform”, In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2013 IEEE, Jun. 23-26, 2013, pp. 763-770.
McFadden, Colin-Druce , “Autonomous car concept swaps steering wheel for gesture controls”, Available online at: <http://www.dvice.com/2014-3-12/autonomous-car-concept-swaps-steering-wheel-gesture-controls>, Mar. 12, 2014, 4 pages.
McKeegan, Noel , “Autonomous taxi can be hailed with and iPad app”, Available online at: <http://www.gizmag.com/autonomous-taxi-ipad/16649/>, Oct. 14, 2010, 2 pages.
Quora, et al., “In Between Rides, Is it in an Uber (Company) Drive's Best Interest to Stay Put or Drive Around?”, Quora.com—A Place to share knowledge and better understand the world. Available online at < https://www.quora.com/Inbetween-rides-is-it-in-an-Uber-company-drivers-best -interest-to-stay-put-or-drive-around>, Feb. 25, 2014, 2 pages.
Ranoa, Raoul , “lnfographic:The car that drives itself”, Los Angeles Times, copyright 2014, Available online at <https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-sci-g-google-self-driving-car-20140528-htmlstory.html>, 2014, 5 pages.
Ridden, Paul , “ATNMBL—the concept car with no steering wheel, brake pedal or driver's seat”, Available online at : <http://www.gizmag.com/atnmbl-autonomous-concept-passenger-transport/15877/>, Jul. 29, 2010, 3 pages.
Schwarz , et al., “Towards Autonomous Vehicles”, University of Nebraska—Lincoln. Final Reports & Technical Breifs from Mid-America Transportation center. Reort# MATC-UI:117, Available Online at <http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1 092&context=matcreports>, Dec. 2013, 79 pages.
uberpeople.net , “How Long Do You Wait? Post Your Times”, UberPeople.NET-Independent Community of Rideshare Drivers, Available Online at <https://uberpeople.netlthreads/how-long-do-you-wait-post-your-times.2162/>, Aug. 20, 2014, 5 pages.
uberpeople.net , “Wait Time for Riders”, UberPeople.NET-Independent Community of Rideshare Drivers. Available Online at < https://uberpeople.net/threads/wait-time-for-riders.2441 >, May 12, 2014, 7 pages.
Urmson , et al., “U.S. Appl. No. 61/391,271, filed Oct. 8, 2010, titled “Autonomous Vehicles””, 56 pages.
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 16815024.1 dated Nov. 12, 2020.
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2019-204532 dated Dec. 8, 2020.
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2019-204532 dated Apr. 23, 2021.
First Chinese Office Action for Application No. 201680035905.X dated Jun. 11, 2020.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200292333 A1 Sep 2020 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 16196194 Nov 2018 US
Child 16886823 US
Parent 15645297 Jul 2017 US
Child 16196194 US
Parent 14745799 Jun 2015 US
Child 15645297 US