1. Technical Field
The invention relates to text mining. More particularly, the invention relates to text mining during chat sessions to determine appropriate product categories.
2. Description of the Background Art
Data sources, such as chat transcripts, e-mails, surveys, and so on, are used to predict a customer's behavior and preferences. Chat categorization provides insights into customer needs by grouping the chats. Effective chat categorization helps to formulate policies for customer retention and target marketing in advance.
It would be advantageous to mine a chat transcript to identify the product that the customer mentions during a chat session. Once the product is mined, it can be assigned to an abstract product category. Such product categories, and other information in the chat session itself, could provide unique insights for some voice of the customer (VoC) analytics. Product categorization can also play a pivotal role in agent recommendation because it provides enormous opportunities with regard to personalization and providing recommendations to the agent or the customer. Unfortunately, the extraction of product names and product related features from a chat session transcript is difficult due to the inherent ambiguity provided by chat as a medium.
Embodiments of the invention predict the propensity and intent of a user to make a purchase, based on product search queries and chat streams. The contents of the data sources, including search queries and chat streams, are analyzed for product names and product attributes. The results of the analyses are used to predict user needs. Product names and attributes are extracted from the data sources. The extracted information is mapped onto abstract product categories. Based on the abstract product categories, offers for products and services are made to the user.
Voice of the Customer (VoC) analytics describe a process by which customer preferences, expectations, aversions, queries, etc. are captured in a structured manner. With regard to business intelligence, VoC analytics offer a technique to produce a hierarchical structure that contains customer wants and needs. The hierarchical structure is then used to predict user purchase needs and intent.
Embodiments of the invention extract keywords from various user communication channels, including search queries, survey comments, Web interaction data, chat streams, and so on. The keywords, which include product types and key attributes, are mapped onto abstract product categories. For example, typical product categories for cellphone products are: cellphones with touchscreens, cellphones with high battery life, iPhone, Samsung Galaxy, $100 Plan, $200 Plan, etc. Inferences are made from the product categories and key attributes and features related to the categories. Recommendations are then made to the user regarding products and services that are available. For example, if a particular product is out of stock, a recommendation is made to the customer service representative or the user for a best alternate product having similar product attributes to the original product of interest to the customer, or to attributes in which the customer has expressed an interest.
In particular, embodiments of the invention relate to product categorization in chat transcripts to understand the customer's propensity to purchase a particular product or service.
In embodiments of the invention, product categorization comprises three stages:
As discussed above, embodiments of the invention comprise three steps, i.e. product extraction, product-to-category mapping, and an application stage.
At the application stage agents are given recommendations about the product, e.g. features, benefits, etc. in real time when interaction with the user occurs, or agents can be trained based on the knowledge mined from such interactions. Product related context discussed in chat can also be passed to other channels, such as IVR, voice, online, etc.
As shown in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other system and network architectures may be used in connection with the practice of the herein disclosed invention. In an embodiment of the invention, the network 12 can be a suitable communication network, such as the Internet, a wireless network, a cellular network, or a wide area network (WAN) which is capable of communicating with one or more client devices 11.
In an embodiment of the invention, the client device 11 can be any of mobile phone, desktop computer, laptop, tablet, or any other communication device that may be used to access the network 12.
The agent module 14 refers to any of a human agent, an automated agent, or any other mechanism which is capable of interacting with the client device 11.
Typically, chat communications involve an instantaneous or near instantaneous communication between two or more users, where each user may transmit, receive, and display communicated information. In an embodiment of the invention, the client device 11 communicates with the agent module 14 through the network 12 and the Web server 13. During the course of communication with the agent module 14, the client device 11 describes or discloses certain product related features, product names, or any other product relevant information. This information is contained in any one of the several formats for storing customer interaction history, namely, a transcript of the chat session, Web interaction data, customer survey data, agent survey data, etc. The Web server 13 records, stores, or captures the relevant information disclosed by the client device 11.
In embodiments of the invention, tracking results from the search engine 25 are fed into the collection module 21. The collection module 21 collects the historical data set recorded by, and received by, one or more search engines. For example, a user may enter a query comprising the keyword “mobile” and specify a category “Android Handsets.” The user then selects others aspects of brand and camera specifications and continues to browse resulting publications. In this example, the keywords, specified categories, and selection of various aspects are tracked by the search engine 25, Web, chat, or any other interaction history logged by the Web server 103, client device 101, agent module 104, or any other communications channel, and collected by the first collection module 21. For example, typical product categories for cellphones products are cellphones with touchscreens, cellphones with high battery life, iPhone, Samsung Galaxy, $100 Plan, $200 Plan, etc. Search results and the agent interactions are tied together by a Web session id, or they could be tied together by a user id captured via these channels
The category determination module 22 manages the determination of appropriate categories, and query aspects for each category. The query is a feature set derived from interaction history of the client device with the agent module or the webserver. Further, the category determination module 22 identifies one or more appropriate categories to associate with a query, and it may choose a suitable category threshold for selecting appropriate categories. The category is determined for the chats in the collection module. The query is made during a chat session. Threshold is a probability value. For example, if the user enters a line stating “I am looking for a washer,” this could result in probability values, e.g. 0.0663 for the washer category and 0.5332 for dishwasher category. Typically, the category that has the highest probability value is chosen as the category for that line
A data processing module 24 processes the collected historical data set from the collection module 21.
The determined appropriate categories and top number of key words and tags associated with a search query may be stored in a database 26. The database 26 may be used for a lookup upon receiving a new query.
Typically, the primary line which occurs at the initiation of a chat session, apart from the greetings, during interaction between the client device 11 and the agent module 14 tends to reveal the important issues in the chat session. Therefore, initially the primary line is extracted 31 from the collection module 21 which comprises data regarding the interaction between the client device 11 and the agent module 14. The extracted primary line is passed 32 through a dependency parser which, in turn, outputs a parsed tree (see, also,
In the case of performance enhancements, a sentence splitter 34 may be used as a pre-processing step, which splits or segments a given text into sentences. Various other processing steps may be also performed on the extracted product name to remove irrelevant, inaccurate, or non-informative words. Therefore, processing steps, such as stop-word removal, spelling correction, and domain specific word removal, are implemented, by the category determination module 22, to obtain cleaner product related information. The various steps in product extraction 30 may be performed in the order presented, in a different order or simultaneously. Further, in some embodiments, some actions listed in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the use of ConceptNet is described herein for the purposes of illustration, and any other suitable source of semantics and semantic relations can be used to practice the herein disclosed invention.
To map a product name to a product category, a family of semantic distance measures, such as Normalized Google Distance (NGD), Wiki distance, Bing distance, etc. may also be used. NGD is a semantic similarity measure derived from the number of hits returned by the Google search engine for a given set of keywords. Keywords having the same or similar meaning in a natural language sense tend to be close in units of Google distance, while words with dissimilar meanings tend to be farther apart. In embodiments of the invention, NGD is used to calculate the semantic relatedness and this relatedness contributes to the mapping between the product name and the product category in the category determination module 22. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the use of NGD is described herein for the purposes of illustration, and any other suitable source of semantics distance measures can be used to practice the herein disclosed invention.
Normalized Google Distance is given by:
where M is the total number of Web pages searched by Google; f(x) and f(y) are the number of hits for search terms x and y, respectively; and f(x, y) is the number of Web pages on which both x and y occur (see Wikipedia, Normalized Google Distance).
For pages other than the first page, it is necessary to start at the top of the page and continue in a double column format. Further, the two columns on the last page should be as close to equal length as possible.
Table 1 below indicates different proof of concept (POC's) and map or similarity scores determined by application of concept net distance or normalized google distance. Table 1 shows results of various POC's and the performance evaluation. In embodiments of the invention, the algorithm applied, namely using semantic similarity scores, establishes the efficiency of the herein disclosed invention on various domains as well as accounts. Embodiments of the invention also provide agent recommendations. The real time text mining capability is also used for leveraging the overall consumer experience.
In embodiments of the invention, the chat client provides access to a knowledge base 92 for agents contained in the database 26. The knowledge base recommends offers for the specific product category and related parts or products for the specific product category. For purposes of the discussion herein, related parts are parts that go in with each other, such as shoes and socks, or parts that are needed to function together, e.g. a motor and brushes. Further, the knowledge base provides competitor analysis and offers and deals for specific product categories, for example, using Google distance as a semantic measure. Using social media data, the pros and cons for a specific product category are also considered, along with the sentiment and subjectivity analysis for a specific product category, brand, and/or name, for example using any algorithm for sentiment analysis, text summarization, or review summarization.
In an embodiment of the invention, all of the recommendations are made at an aggregate level and, mostly, performed offline over time. Because the recommendation is preferably personalized to a specific user visit, the element of real time mining through web, chat, and social channels to generate more personalized recommendations is introduced through the category determination module 22.
Although, the above embodiments use chat as a medium to mine interaction data between the client device 11 and agent module 14 to thus determine appropriate categories, a person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the invention disclosed herein can be practiced through other mediums, such as Web and social channels and the like.
Embodiments of the invention determine product categories in real time, so that not only are offline recommendations provided, but recommendations for both the customer and agent module 14 are also provided, based on the product category and names.
Computer Implementation
The embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented through at least one software program running on at least one hardware device and performing network management functions to control the network elements. The network elements shown in the figures include blocks which can be at least one of a hardware device, or a combination of hardware device and software module.
The computer system 1600 includes a processor 1602, a main memory 1604 and a static memory 1606, which communicate with each other via a bus 1608. The computer system 1600 may further include a display unit 1610, for example, a liquid crystal display (LCD). The computer system 1600 also includes an alphanumeric input device 1612, for example, a keyboard; a cursor control device 1614, for example, a mouse; a disk drive unit 1616, a signal generation device 1618, for example, a speaker, and a network interface device 1628.
The disk drive unit 1616 includes a machine-readable medium 1624 on which is stored a set of executable instructions, i.e. software, 1626 embodying any one, or all, of the methodologies described herein below. The software 1626 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 1604 and/or within the processor 1602. The software 1626 may further be transmitted or received over a network 1630 by means of a network interface device 1628.
In contrast to the system 1600 discussed above, a different embodiment uses logic circuitry instead of computer-executed instructions to implement processing entities. Other alternatives include a digital signal processing chip (DSP), discrete circuitry (such as resistors, capacitors, diodes, inductors, and transistors), field programmable gate array (FPGA), programmable logic array (PLA), programmable logic device (PLD), and the like.
It is to be understood that embodiments may be used as or to support software programs or software modules executed upon some form of processing core (such as the CPU of a computer) or otherwise implemented or realized upon or within a machine or computer readable medium. A machine-readable medium includes any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine, e.g. a computer. For example, a machine readable medium includes read-only memory (ROM); random access memory (RAM); magnetic disk storage media; optical storage media; flash memory devices; electrical, optical, acoustical or other form of propagated signals, for example, carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.; or any other type of media suitable for storing or transmitting information.
Although the invention is described herein with reference to the preferred embodiment, one skilled in the art will readily appreciate that other applications may be substituted for those set forth herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the invention should only be limited by the Claims included below.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/749,120, filed Jan. 4, 2013, which application is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6393460 | Gruen | May 2002 | B1 |
6618725 | Fukuda | Sep 2003 | B1 |
7272509 | Culot | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7356419 | Culot | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7792889 | Lee | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7881984 | Kane, Jr. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8117064 | Bourne et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8335719 | Quraishi | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8396741 | Kannan | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8577753 | Vincent | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8935151 | Petrov | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9002889 | Jamthe | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9386107 | Browning | Jul 2016 | B1 |
20020059098 | Sazawa | May 2002 | A1 |
20040117383 | Lee | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040139426 | Wu | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050060217 | Douglas | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060155765 | Takeuchi | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070226628 | Schlack | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070237361 | Sandor | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080077451 | Anthony | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080104060 | Abhyankar | May 2008 | A1 |
20080201143 | Olligschlaeger | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221870 | Attardi | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235018 | Eggen | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090006333 | Jones | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090062681 | Pradeep | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090144609 | Liang | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090222313 | Kannan | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090319516 | Igelman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017397 | Koyanagi | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100138282 | Kannan | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100228733 | Harrison | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100332287 | Gates | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110055309 | Gibor | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110119050 | Deschacht | May 2011 | A1 |
20110153614 | Solomon | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161431 | Jagannathan | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110179114 | Dilip | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110206198 | Freedman | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238410 | Larcheveque et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238674 | Avner | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246920 | Lebrun | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252343 | Broman | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120076283 | Ajmera | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120102121 | Wu | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120130771 | Kannan et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120173981 | Day | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179551 | Georgakis | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209879 | Banerjee | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215640 | Ramer et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120240177 | Rose | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120266258 | Tuchman | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120278159 | Kumar | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120330961 | Miao | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006952 | Wong | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130060871 | Downes | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130089848 | Exeter | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130136253 | Liberman Ben-Ami | May 2013 | A1 |
20130185307 | El-Yaniv | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130282595 | Vijayaraghavan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130287187 | Gandhe | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130307997 | O'Keefe | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130347018 | Limp | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140074951 | Misir | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140082106 | Scherpa | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140150016 | Feng | May 2014 | A1 |
20140195562 | Hardeniya | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195621 | Rao DV | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140344052 | Seals | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351078 | Kaplan | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140379524 | Grimaud | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150254349 | Sela | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009104450 | May 2009 | JP |
WO 2007052285 | May 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ittoo et al., “A Text Mining-Based Recommendation System for Customer Decision Making in Online Product Customization”, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, pp. 473-477, 2006. |
Loh et al., “Recommendation of Complementary Material During Chat Discussions”, Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 385-399, 2010. |
Vijayaraghavan et al., “Applications of Data Mining and Machine Learning on Online Customer Care”, Industry Practice Expo Invited Talk, KDD '11, Aug. 21-24, 2011, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 779 (1 page). |
Dorre et al., “Text Mining: Finding Nuggets in Mountains of Textual Data,” In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 398-401, 1999. |
Edelstein et al., “Building Profitable Customer Relationship with Data Mining,” SCN Education B.V. (ed.), Customer Relationship Management, pp. 339-351, 2000. |
Evangelopoulos et al., “Text-Mining the Voice of the People,” Communication of the ACM, vol. 55, Issue 2, Feb. 2012, pp. 62-69. |
Kontostathis et al., “Text Mining and CyberCrime,” In Text Mining: Applications and Theory (Eds M.V. Berry and J. Kogan), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 14 pages, 2010. |
Lakshminarayan et al., “Improving Customer Experience via Text Mining,” S. Bhalla (Ed.): DNIS 2005, LNCS 3433, pp. 288-299, 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140195562 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61749120 | Jan 2013 | US |