The present, application is a 35 U.S.C. §§ 371 national phase conversion of PCT/EP2014/056779, filed Apr. 4, 2014, which claims priority of Austrian Patent Application No. A371-2013, filed May 3, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein, and A50620/2013, filed Sep. 26, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein. The PCT International Applications were published in the German language.
The present invention relates to a method and a computer program product for determining the ferritic phase fraction xα after heating or cooling of a steel strip in a metallurgical system, such as an annealer or a cooling zone. In addition the invention relates to a device for carrying out the method.
A known method in the prior art is to determine the phase fractions in a steel strip using what is known as Barkhausen noise or by measuring the magnetic hysteresis. Another known method is to determine the phase fractions in a steel strip using what is known as post-mortem analysis, comprising the steps of taking a sample, preparing the sample and a metallurgical analysis of the prepared sample. Post-mortem analysis enables conclusions to be drawn indirectly (i.e. via the structure) about the process conditions present in a cooling or heating zone.
The disadvantage of measuring the Barkhausen noise or measuring the magnetic hysteresis is that the measuring head must be moved very close to the strip. Additional measuring devices, which are often not present in a metallurgical system, are also necessary. This results in a considerable extra outlay in apparatus and personnel.
The disadvantage of post-mortem analysis is that conclusions can only be drawn about reaching the required characteristics of the embodied structure long after the manufacturing of the steel strip. The long time delay during post-mortem analysis means that it cannot be used for the regulated balancing out of transient conditions during the manufacturing of the steel strip—e.g. for a slowing down of the casting speed because of a change of ladle, which is accompanied in a continuous casting system by a reduction in the throughput speed of the steel strip through a cooling zone.
The object of the invention is to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art and to specify a method, a computer program product and a device for determining the ferritic phase fraction after heating or cooling of a steel strip, with which the ferritic phase fraction can be determined
This object is achieved by a method disclosed herein for determining the ferritic phase fraction xα after heating or cooling of a steel strip.
In concrete terms the method has the following method steps:
wherein
In this case—typically either directly after the austenitic finish rolling (wherein the steel strip has an entirely austenitic structure in the last roll stand during the last rolling pass) of the steel strip in a hot-rolling mill or immediately after cooling (wherein the steel strip after cooling has an entirely ferritic structure) of the steel strip—the width w1 and the temperature T1 of the steel strip are measured, wherein the steel strip has a ferritic phase fraction xα1. This ferritic phase fraction xα1 is either sufficiently well known from process management (e.g. after austenitic finish rolling with xα1=0) or is determined once by methods for determining the phase fractions according to the prior art. The two measurements for determining the width w1 and the temperature T1 are preferably made in a non-contact manner, e.g. by an optical width measurement or a pyrometer. For the greatest possible precision it is advantageous for both measurements to be made approximately at the same time on the same section of the—typically uncut—strip. Subsequently the steel strip is heated (e.g. in a heating zone) or cooled, e.g. in a cooling zone.
During cooling the structure of the steel strip is converted at least partly from the austenitic state γ (i.e. from austenite) into a ferritic state α (e.g. into a ferrite or a martensite . . . ). During heating the structure of the steel strip is converted at least partly from a ferritic state α into the austenitic state γ.
After the heating or cooling of the steel strip the width w and the temperature T of the at least partly converted steel strip are determined once again. Here too it is advantageous for both measurements to be made approximately at the same time on the same section of the strip.
Finally the ferritic phase fraction xα is determined by the formula
wherein for determination of the ferritic phase fraction xα, just a few physical parameters for the steel strip, such as the linear thermal expansion functions αγ for austenite and αα for ferrite, as well as the widths w1 and w, and the temperature T1 and T, are used. These functions are typically assumed as linear; their parameters mainly referred to in the literature as linear thermal expansion coefficients—are known to the person skilled in the art Finally T0 involves a reference temperature of typically 20° C.
In an alternate form of embodiment of the invention the so-called spatial coefficient of thermal expansion is used instead of the linear coefficient of thermal expansion. In such cases conclusions are drawn about the ferritic phase fraction via the changes in length and width of the steel strip during cooling.
The invention enables the converted fraction of the structure to be determined online, i.e. during ongoing operation of a metallurgical system, with a sufficiently high precision and essentially by mechanisms which are typically already present in metallurgical systems. In addition the phase fraction occurring—increased or reduced during the observed process step—can be evaluated easily and quickly by the above formula.
There is a large class of areas of application in practical terms. In concrete terms, in the method for determining the ferritic phase fraction xα after the heating of a steel strip, the following method steps are carried out:
In this method it is assumed that initially the steel strip is present entirely in a ferritic state; this is often the case if the steel strip is cooled before, preferably immediately before, the measurement of the width w1 and the temperature T1 in a cooling zone (e.g. a laminar cooling zone).
In the technically important case of heating the steel strip by annealing, the width w and the temperature T of the at least partly converted steel strip are measured during and/or after the annealing.
During annealing it is especially advantageous for the annealing duration and/or the annealing temperature during annealing to be set, preferably under closed-loop control, as a function of the ferritic phase fraction xα.
The annealing duration can be set easily via the speed at which the strip passes through the annealer. However it should be noted here that the passage speed of the strip also changes the throughput through the annealer. With direct-coupled operation of an annealer with a rapid cooling zone, the speed during rapid cooling (also quenching) is also changed by changing the passage speed of the strip.
The annealing temperature is usually set by burners.
For example during intercritical annealing in a continuous annealer, for smaller and rapid corrections of the ferritic phase fraction xα, the passage speed can be changed and immediately thereafter the annealing temperature can be adjusted, since the annealing temperature can naturally be adapted more slowly than the passage speed. Subsequently the passage speed of the strip is successively taken back to the desired speed, wherein the annealing temperature is adapted in parallel thereto, so that the actual phase fraction xα corresponds to the required phase fraction as precisely as possible.
In any event setting the annealing duration and/or the annealing temperature under open-loop or closed-loop control enables the actual structure composition to be set to the required structure composition. The target structure is achieved especially precisely if the annealing duration and/or the annealing temperature are set under closed-loop control. With closed-loop control setting of the annealing duration a required-actual comparison is made between the required phase fraction and the actual phase fraction xα, wherein the annealing is continued until the actual phase fraction xα corresponds to the required phase fraction as precisely as possible. With closed-loop control setting of the annealing temperature, as a function of a required-actual comparison between the required phase fraction and the actual phase fraction xα, the annealing temperature is adapted until the actual phase fraction xα corresponds to the required phase fraction as precisely as possible.
There is a further technically important special case of the inventive method for determining the ferritic phase fraction after the cooling of a steel strip. In concrete terms the following method steps are carried out:
This special case especially occurs when the steel strip is finish-rolled in the austenitic state, i.e. the steel strip leaves the last roll stand of the finish-rolling train in the austenitic state and is subsequently cooled.
It is especially advantageous for the steel strip to be hot-rolled before, preferably immediately before, the measurement of the width w1 and the temperature T1. In the preferred form of embodiment a partial phase conversion from the austenitic state between the hot-rolling and the measurements of w1 and T1 is prevented.
Typically the steel strip is cooled in a cooling zone after measurement of the width w1 and the temperature T1.
During hot-rolling it can be expedient for the measurement of the width w and the temperature T of the at least partly converted steel strip to be undertaken immediately before coiling. However these measurements could also take place previously, e.g. during or after cooling in a cooling zone.
The phase conversion can be set especially precisely if the cooling is set during cooling in the cooling zone as a function of the ferritic phase fraction xα determined in this way.
In the simplest case the cooling zone is set under open-loop control. Phase conversion is controlled especially precisely under closed-loop control, i.e. by a required-actual comparison, wherein the deviation between the required value and the actual value of the ferritic phase fraction is used for setting the cooling zone. This enables the degree of conversion in the cooling zone to be pre-specified precisely even under transient operating conditions.
The cooling can be set for example as a function of the ferritic phase fractions xα under open-loop control, or preferably under closed-loop control, using the cooling duration and/or the cooling intensity.
A computer program product for carrying out the inventive method, to which values for the width w1 and the temperature T1 before the at least partial phase conversion, the width w and the temperature of the steel strip after the at least partial phase conversion and physical parameters of the steel strip are able to be supplied, has a computing module for computing the ferritic phase fraction xα
Thus the computer program product can be loaded into a computer which carries out the inventive method, for example in a metallurgical system.
A device for determining the ferritic phase fraction xα after heating or cooling of a steel strip in a cooling zone, especially for carrying out the inventive method, has
wherein the computing unit is connected for signaling purposes to the first temperature measuring device, the first width measuring device, the second temperature measuring device and the second width measuring device.
It is possible to influence the phase conversion during the operation of the inventive device if the cooling zone has at least one cooling nozzle with a setting device or the heating zone has at least one heating element with a setting device, wherein the computing unit is connected for signaling purposes to the setting device, so that the ferritic phase fraction can be set.
The setting device can be embodied in a cooling zone as a valve, for example a ball valve with rotary drive, wherein a cooling medium (e.g. water, air or water with air) flows through the valve. In another form of embodiment the speed of a centrifugal pump can be set for example, by which the pressure of the cooling medium can be set.
The setting device for setting the temperature in a heating zone embodied as an induction furnace can be embodied as a frequency converter, so that the inductor of the induction furnace assigned to the frequency converter is activated with variable frequency and/or voltage level. This enables the heating of the steel strip to be set explicitly.
The setting device for setting the annealing temperature in an annealer can be embodied as a valve, for example a ball valve with rotary drive, wherein either an oxygen carrier (typically air or oxygen) or a fuel (e.g. heating oil, natural gas etc.) flows through the valve. The oxygen carrier and the fuel are burnt in the burner. Naturally a setting device can be present in each case for the oxygen carrier and the fuel, so that for example the volume ratio between oxygen and fuel can be kept constant (e.g. close to the stoichiometric ratio).
It is expedient for there to be an open-loop control device between the computing unit and the setting device. For high accuracy, it is advantageous when a closed-loop control device is disposed between the two.
It is advantageous for the heating or cooling zone in the transport direction of the steel strip to have at least two sections, wherein a first temperature measuring device and a first width measuring device are disposed before each section and a second temperature measuring device and a second width measuring device are disposed after each section, and each section has a computing unit for determining the ferritic phase fraction X. This enables the phase conversion to be determined even within the sections of the heating or cooling zone.
It is especially advantageous for each cooling zone to have at least one cooling nozzle with a setting device, and for the computing unit to be connected to the setting device for signaling purposes, so that the ferritic phase fraction can be set in the cooling zone. This enables the phase conversion within the cooling zone to be influenced quite explicitly, e.g. set under open-loop or closed-loop control.
In order to prevent the measured temperature values T1 and T being corrupted by cooling water it is advantageous for a blower for blowing off the steel strip to be disposed before the first and/or the second temperature measuring device. The blower can for example involve an air nozzle, which blows cooling water off the steel strip using compressed air.
Further advantages and features of the present invention emerge from the description given below of non-restrictive exemplary embodiments wherein, in the figures below:
The knowledge of the temperatures and widths at at least two points of the strip before and after cooling, as well as under the prerequisite of an entirely austenitic initial state and the linear coefficient of thermal expansion for ferrite and austenite, enables the ferritic phase fraction xα to be determined. This process will be outlined below:
The width w of a steel strip as a function of the temperature T is given by w=w0[1+α(T−T0)], wherein w0 corresponds to the width of the steel strip at a reference temperature T0 of typically 20° C. and α is the linear coefficient of thermal expansion. Naturally a higher-order polynomial approach can be used instead of the linear approach.
Since the austenitic phase γ has a different linear coefficient of thermal expansion αγ than a ferritic phase α(i) with αα(i), the width of a steel strip, which has a fraction xα(i) of a ferritic phase (i) and a fraction xγ of the austenitic phase γ, can be written in a mixed approach as follows
If it is further assumed that only one ferritic phase α (typically ferrite) is present in the steel strip during the cooling, then the previous expression is simplified to
w=w0[1+xγαγ(T−T0)+xααα(T−T0)]
It is further known that the sum of the austenitic phase and all ferritic phases always amounts to 1, i.e.
xγ+Σixα(i)=1
If only one ferritic phase is present, xγ +xα=1 applies.
For the case with only one ferritic phase the following therefore applies
w=w0[1+(1−xα)αγ(T−T0)+xααα(T−T0)]
Thus the following applies for the ferritic phase fraction
The width w1 of the steel strip at a temperature T1 during austenitic rolling is given by
w1=w0[1+αγ(T1−T0)]
wherein αγ is the linear coefficient of thermal expansion of austenite.
By combination of the last two equations the following applies
In concrete terms, for w1=1.8 in and αγ=1·10−5 1/K and αα=6·10−6 1/K, a ferritic phase fraction of xα=20% is produced from the last equation at T=400° C. and a width of w=L7923 m.
Although the invention has been illustrated and described in greater detail by the preferred exemplary embodiments, the invention is not restricted by the disclosed examples and other variations can be derived herefrom by the person skilled in the art, without departing from the scope of protection of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 371/2013 | May 2013 | AT | national |
A 50620/2013 | Sep 2013 | AT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/056779 | 4/4/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/177341 | 11/6/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6679626 | Gramckow et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686735 | Daalmans et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7938917 | Okamoto et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20070151635 | Sano | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070276638 | Borchers | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080135137 | Okamoto et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100131092 | Schmors et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100219567 | Imanari | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
408623 | Jan 2002 | AT |
201915121 | Aug 2011 | CN |
19941736 | Mar 2001 | DE |
10256750 | Jun 2004 | DE |
19881711 | Jul 2012 | DE |
S59129717 | Jul 1984 | JP |
2002294351 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2012011448 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012201956 | Oct 2012 | JP |
20080100162 | Nov 2008 | KR |
2 060 846 | May 1996 | RU |
2 064 672 | Jul 1996 | RU |
2 150 121 | May 2000 | RU |
2 363 740 | Aug 2009 | RU |
WO 2004042480 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2005099923 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Aug. 11, 2014 issued in corresponding International application No. PCT/EP2014/056779. |
Written Opinion dated Aug. 11, 2014 issued in corresponding International application No. PCT/EP2014/056779. |
“Magnetische Bauteile Und Baugruppen.” Jun. 25, 2009. Web. Aug. 19, 2015. <http://www.attempo.com/Daten/Kernmaterialien.pdf>. |
“Info-Sheet No. 4—Selected Properties of NiTl-based Alloys.” Web. Aug. 19, 2015. <http://www.memory-metalle.de/html/03_knowhow/PDF/MM_04_properties_e.pdf >. |
Austrian Search Report dated Nov. 14, 2014 issued in corresponding Austrian patent application No. A50620/2013. |
Austrian Search Report dated Nov. 22, 2013 issued in corresponding Austrian patent application No. A371/2013. |
Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2018 issued in corresponding Russian Patent Application No. 2015141153/02(06346) without English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160076119 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |