The present invention relates to electric and electronic detonators and, more specifically, to such detonators being protected against inadvertent firing by stray or induced electrical currents, magnetic fields and the like.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,179,248 (the '248 patent), issued Jan. 12, 1993 to J. Keith Hartman et al. and entitled “Zener Diode For Protection Of Semiconductor Explosive Bridge”, discloses protection of a semiconductor bridge against inadvertent firing by connecting a zener diode across the conductive metal lands forming part of the semiconductor bridge. As explained at column 3, line 14 et seq., a semiconductor bridge device includes a pair of spaced-apart metal lands disposed in ohmic contact on a doped semiconductor layer with a gap between the lands. In response to a voltage or current equal to or in excess of a predetermined level and duration being applied to the gap between the lands, a plasma is formed in the gap with sufficient energy to initiate an explosive disposed in the gap. The device for preventing accidental discharge includes and preferably consists of a zener diode having anode and cathode electrodes respectively connected to the first and second lands of the semiconductor bridge device.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,309,841 (the '841 patent), issued May 10, 1994 to J. Keith Hartman et al. and entitled “Zener Diode For Protection of Integrated Circuit Explosive Bridge”, expands on the disclosure of the '248 patent, including disclosure of circuits adding a capacitor and energy source in parallel with the zener diode and incorporating the elements into an integrated circuit.
As disclosed in both the '248 patent (col. 6, line 56 through col. 7, line 7; FIG. 3) and the '841 patent (col. 7, lines 20-39; FIG. 3), protection against premature firing of the semiconductor explosive bridge is accomplished via waveform clipping by the protective zener diode.
While existing protective schemes for detonator devices may be suitable for their intended purpose, there remains, however, a need in the art for improved protective schemes that provide improved protection against possible stray voltage conditions that could cause unplanned initiation of a detonator.
An embodiment of the invention includes an ignition circuit for a detonator including; an igniter having a first terminal and an opposing second terminal, a first diode electrically connected in series with the igniter at the first terminal, and a second diode electrically connected in series with the igniter at the second terminal. The first and second diodes each have an anode terminal and a cathode terminal, wherein like terminals of the first and second diodes are electrically connected to the igniter, thereby defining proximal terminals proximate the igniter and distal terminals on an opposing side of each respective diode. An energy source and a switch are electrically connected in series with each other, and are electrically connected across the distal terminals. Current flow through the igniter sufficient to ignite the igniter is prevented until an ignition voltage is applied to the distal terminals that is equal to or greater than the reverse breakdown voltage of the first diode or the second diode.
Referring now to the drawings, which are meant to be exemplary and not limiting, and wherein like elements are numbered alike in the accompanying Figures:
An embodiment of the invention, as shown and described by the various figures and accompanying text, provides a protection scheme for preventing unplanned initiation of a detonator that may be used for seismic exploration, oil/gas well stimulation, or blasting in hazardous environments, while providing sufficient ignition voltage to an igniter upon command without substantially increasing the amount of energy that an energy source must be capable of delivering to the detonator for delayed ignition.
Referring to
Referring now to
In relating
As mentioned above, resistor 235 may be optionally disposed in electrical connection across the distal terminals of diodes 225, 230, and in parallel with the series-connected energy source 215 and switch 220. When present, resistor 235 provides an electrical path in front of the diodes 225, 230 for pre-testing the integrity of electrical connections from the firing station (not illustrated) up to the protection circuit 205 and igniter 210, and for protecting the circuit 205 against stray static voltages.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, current flow through igniter 210 sufficient to ignite igniter 210 is prevented until an ignition voltage is applied to the distal terminals (250, 255 for example) of diodes 225, 230 that is equal to or greater than the reverse breakdown voltage of the first diode 225 or the second diode 230.
In an embodiment, the first and second diodes 225, 230 are zener diodes having the same reverse breakdown voltage rating of 20 Volts, and are disposed such that their anodes 226, 231 are the proximal terminals (that is, anodes 226, 231 are electrically connected to igniter 210).
In another embodiment, first and second diodes 225, 230 are zener diodes having the same reverse breakdown voltage rating of 200 Volts.
In an embodiment, igniter 210 is a bridgewire designed for contact with (for example, to be embedded within) an explosive device (for example, the first stage detonator charge 150) with a pair of lead wires extending from the bridgewire. However, it will be appreciated that other igniters suitable for the purposes disclosed herein may be employed in place of the bridgewire, such as a semiconductor bridge 300 for example, generally depicted in
In an embodiment, first diode 225, second diode 230, and optional resistor 235 are all surface mounted on a circuit board, generally depicted by reference numeral 205 and the associated dashed-line graphical box depicted in
Upon closure of the switch 220 (planned ignition), not only does the energy source 215 have sufficient energy to generate a voltage at the distal terminals 250, 255 in excess of the reverse breakdown voltage of the first diode 225 or the second diode 230 to generate sufficient current flow to ignite the igniter 210, but also the energy source 215 further has sufficient energy to permanently damage a reverse-biased one of the first and second diodes 225, 230. Since the detonator 100 is an intended self-destructive device, there is no need for either diode 225, 230 to be designed for passing a reverse-biased current without damage thereto. As such, diodes having a reverse-biased current rating far below the actual current passed are fully sufficient for the purposes disclosed herein, thereby permitting small diodes to be used in a compact design for the protection circuit 205.
In an embodiment and in the event of the switch 220 being closed, the energy source 215 has sufficient energy to generate an ignition voltage to ignite the igniter 210 that is equal to or greater than 1.1 times the reverse breakdown voltage of either of the first diode 225 and the second diode 230. And, in the event of the switch 220 being open, each of the first 225 and second 230 diodes have a reverse breakdown voltage sufficient to prevent the igniter 210 from firing upon the occurrence of a stray voltage at the distal terminals (250, 255 for example) less than the reverse breakdown voltage of the associated reverse-fed diode.
While embodiments of the invention have been described herein employing a circuit board 205 with diodes 225, 230 and resistor 235 surface-mounted thereon, it will be appreciated that other packaging arrangements can be employed for the purposes disclosed herein, such as integrally molding diodes 225, 230 and resistor 235 into a plug, again generally depicted by reference numeral 205 and the associated dashed-line graphical box depicted in
While embodiments of the invention have been described herein having anodes 226, 231 of first diode 225 and second diode 230, respectively, being connected to igniter 210, it will be appreciated that the scope of the invention also covers an arrangement where both diodes are reversed such that their cathodes 227, 232 are connected to igniter 210, as long as both diodes are oriented in the same direction such that no current will flow through igniter 210 if an unplanned voltage below the diode breakdown voltage is applied across the contact points 250, 255 of circuit 205.
An example of the circuit illustrated in
A series of tests were conducted in which different levels of voltages were applied to the circuit across contact points 240, 245. All of the tests were carried out by supplying power (energy source 215 for example) from a 250 micro Farad capacitor charged to the voltage specified in Table-1 below, which tabulates the test results.
As shown by the data of Table-1, application of test voltages below, or even slightly in excess of, the 20-volt rating of the zener diodes precluded firing of the bridgewire. For example, voltages as high as 19 volts (tests 2 and 3), 19.8 and 20.5 volts (test 4), 19.5, 20 and 21.7 volts (test 6) and 20, 21 and 21.7 volts (tests 7-10) all failed to fire the bridgewire. On the other hand, voltages more significantly above the 20-volt rating of the zener diode provided consistent firing. For example, tests 3 and 5-8 showed firing at 22 volts. Test 10, which showed no firing at 21.7 volts, showed that firing occurred at 21.9 volts. Significantly higher voltages such as 36 volts (test 1) and 29.5 volts (test 9) were successful. The test data clearly show the reliability of the zener diode protecting the bridgewire from firing even at voltages as high as 21.7 volts.
Because diodes 225 and 230 are oriented in the same direction as illustrated in
If zener diodes are utilized as the diodes 240, 245, their breakdown voltage can be precisely specified and a specific all fire/no fire value can readily be established for the diodeprotected detonator by utilizing methods and calculations well known to those skilled in the art. As discussed above, the facing diodes, for example, facing zener diodes, together with the other circuit components, can readily be positioned on a small board or molded into a plug, either of which will readily fit into the inside diameter, about 0.25 inches (6.5 mm), of a standard commercial detonator shell. The disclosed detonator is resistant to stray current engendered by radio frequency energy, static and any other electrical power that does not exceed the diode breakdown voltage.
It is contemplated that in an embodiment where first and second diodes 225, 230 are zener diodes each having a reverse breakdown voltage of 200 Volts, sufficient protection of igniter 210 will be provided against a standard 120 VAC-rms voltage at input pins 115 having a peak voltage of about 170 Volts. By employing zener diodes having a 200 Volt reverse breakdown voltage (first and second diodes 225, 230 in the contemplated embodiment) and a very small current rating (less than 2 milliamps for example), a massive energy pulse of 4-8 joules from a 400 Volt capacitor discharge firing system will result in a one-time use of diodes 225, 230, which will fail in conduction mode. Since diodes 225, 230 need to work only once, such an occurrence of failure in the conduction mode is perfectly acceptable for the purposes disclosed herein. An exemplary commercially available zener diode suitable for the purposes disclosed herein is part number 1SMB5956BT3G manufactured by Oakley Telecom, LC, having a nominal reverse zener voltage of 200 volts at a reverse current of 1.9 milliamps.
The accuracy of the timing of initiation of individual explosive charges in a multiple-charge blasting system must be closely controlled to achieve the desired fragmentation of ore and rock, and to reduce the influence of the blast on structures outside the blast zone. The accuracy of timing of the initiation of individual charges controls the effectiveness of the blast by providing the required distribution of blast induced shockwaves. Embodiments of the invention provide detonators that can be used for closely controlling the timing of the initiation of individual explosive charges in multiple-explosive charge blast operations. For example, for electronic delay of detonator 100, the test voltage provided to contact points 250, 255 of ignition circuit 200 could be safely raised to a level just below the breakdown voltage of diodes 225, 230 without concern of prematurely firing the very low energy igniter 210, thereby enabling better communication with other connected detonators within the multiple-charge blasting system. Additionally, and contrary to other blasting systems that employ a series-connected resistor to protect the igniter, which inherently results in an I2R power loss across the series-connected resistor during ignition, embodiments of the invention do not have such a power loss and therefore have more energy available from energy source 215 for use by electronic delay circuitry, communications, and controls of the blasting system.
While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best or only mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, the use of the terms a, an, etc. do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/894,324, filed Mar. 12, 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2658451 | Horne | Nov 1953 | A |
3022446 | Irish, Jr. | Feb 1962 | A |
3640224 | Petrick et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
4769734 | Heinemeyer et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4967665 | Baginski | Nov 1990 | A |
5179248 | Hartman et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5309841 | Hartman et al. | May 1994 | A |
7021218 | Davis | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7268445 | Uono et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080223241 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60894324 | Mar 2007 | US |