The present invention relates to packaging systems and methods for packaging and shipping detonators.
The need to transport commercial quantities of explosive initiating devices comprising detonators (“detonator devices”) of course gives rise to safety concerns during packing, storing and shipping of the detonator devices. The packages may be exposed to a wide range of temperatures and a variety of physical stresses during shipment and handling. In designing a packaging system for detonators, attention must be given not only to preventing unwanted detonation of the detonators in the package during shipment and handling, but also to limit or prevent the propagation of such unwanted detonation from one detonator device to another within a container and from one container to another. The prior art generally addresses these concerns through the use of dense packaging materials and by disposing detonators singly in isolated compartments.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,494,152 to Sobczak et al. dated Feb. 27, 1996 discloses a packaging system for detonator devices comprising a plurality of subpack containers disposed in an overpack container, and an overpack pad disposed between adjacent subpack containers.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,868,360 to Donkin dated Jan. 13, 1959 discloses a storage container for detonators in which an outer box is divided by an interior partition into two main compartments, and wherein each compartment is divided into cells by a separator assembly. A single detonator is disposed within each cell.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,601,919 to Darbyshire dated Jul. 1, 1952 discloses a container for packaging electrical detonators comprising an outer box that holds a plurality of compartmentalized inner boxes. Each compartment is dimensioned and configured to hold a single detonator and associated leg wires.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,352,998 to Alexander et al. dated Jul. 4, 1944 discloses a packaging system for electrical blasting caps and their associated leg wires in which each cap and its leg wire is disposed within a cardboard tube, and a plurality of the tubes is contained within a box.
U.S. Pat. No. 1,631,756 to Olin dated Jun. 7, 1927 discloses a tube arrangement for packaging a single detonator.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,586,602 to Levey dated May 6, 1986 shows a transport system for transporting detonating cord in which the detonating cord is looped around cardboard support members and packed in a cardboard box surrounded by cardboard baffles.
The Applicant and its predecessor in interest have previously used a packaging system comprising an overpack container within which was disposed a plurality of subpack containers, each subpack container holding a plurality of unsegregated identical detonator devices.
Generally, in accordance with the present invention there is provided a packaging system for storing and transporting in a single container two types of detonator devices, one type having leads which contain explosive or combustible, that is, energetic, material (“reactive leads”) and the other type having leads which do not contain reactive material (“inert leads”). For packaging and shipping the detonator devices, the leads are coiled and one or more easily removable bands, such as paper or cardboard bands, are used to hold the leads in their coiled configuration. The invention provides for packaging the two types of detonator devices with coiled inert leads interposed between coiled reactive leads in order to interrupt, or at least increase the chance of interrupting, propagation of accidental initiation of reactive leads from one coiled reactive lead to another. Reactive leads, such as shock tube or safety fuse, are used for non-electric detonators, and inert leads, such as electric-conducting leg wires, are used for electric detonators. Both non-electric and electric detonators may include either a pyrotechnic or electronic delay timing mechanism.
For economy of expression, in the claims and sometimes below, reactive lead coils, that is, coils of reactive leads, are referred to as “reactive coils” or “reactive coil” and inert lead coils, that is, coils of inert leads, are referred to as “inert coils” or “inert coil”.
Specifically, in accordance with the present invention there is provided a packaging system comprising a container within which are disposed a plurality of first detonator devices comprising detonators having reactive coils attached thereto, and a plurality of second detonator devices respectively comprising detonators having inert coils attached thereto. The first and second detonator devices are disposed within the container so that at least some of the reactive coils have interposed between them inert coils, the inert coils thereby providing barriers of inert coils between at least some of the reactive coils.
Other aspects of the packaging system of the present invention provide for one or more of the following additional features in any suitable combination. The barriers of inert coils may be substantially co-extensive in length and width with the reactive coils; the inert coils and the reactive coils may be of approximately the same length and width; the reactive coils may be larger than the inert coils and individual barriers may be comprised of a plurality of the inert coils, for example, two inert coils; the packaging system may comprise abutting pairs of the reactive coils which are separated from adjacent abutting pairs of reactive coils by barriers of inert coils; the reactive coils may be coils of shock tube and the inert coils may be coils of insulated electric transmission wires; and the barriers of inert coils may be substantially coextensive with the reactive coils.
Another aspect of the present invention provides for the reactive coils to have a reactive coil length and reactive coil width and for the inert coils to have an inert coil length and an inert coil width, the inert coil length being not greater than about one-half of the reactive coil length, and the inert coil width being about the same as the reactive coil width, and wherein respective ones of the inert coils are removably secured to respective ones of the reactive coils so as to form mixed coil pairs and leave a portion of the length of the reactive coil of a given mixed coil pair uncovered by the inert coil to which it is secured, and adjacent mixed coil pairs are nested within the container to dispose the inert coils of adjacent mixed coil pairs in alignment with each other whereby to provide barriers of inert coils which extend between their associated reactive coils for about the entire length of the reactive coils. Related features of the this aspect of the present invention include one or more of the following features: the inert coil length may be about one-half of the reactive coil length and the barriers may each be comprised of two aligned inert coils; and the mixed coil pairs may be disposed within the container in a configuration wherein the reactive coils and the inert coil barriers are disposed in a single or repeating pattern of: (1) reactive coil, (2) inert coil barrier, (3) reactive coil, (4) reactive coil, (5) inert coil barrier, (6) reactive coil.
In accordance with a method aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of packaging within a container a plurality of first detonator devices comprising detonators having reactive coils attached thereto and second detonator devices comprising detonators having inert coils attached thereto, the method comprising: interleaving inert coils between at least some of the reactive coils to provide a barrier of inert coils between at least some of the reactive coils.
In another method aspect of the present invention, the reactive coils have a reactive coil length and reactive coil width and the inert coils have an inert coil length and an inert coil width, the inert coil length being not greater than about one-half of the reactive coil length, and the inert coil width being about the same as the reactive coil width, the method further comprising removably securing respective ones of the inert coils to respective ones of the reactive coils, leaving a portion of the length of the reactive coils uncovered by their associated inert coils to thereby form a mixed coil pair, and nesting adjacent mixed coil pairs within the container to dispose the inert coils of adjacent mixed coil pairs in alignment with each other, whereby the resulting barriers of inert coils extend between their associated reactive coils for about the entire length of the reactive coils. Related method aspects of the invention include one or more of the following features: the inert coil length may be about one-half of the reactive coil length and one inert coil is removably secured at one end of a reactive coil to leave about one-half of the reactive coil exposed, and the resulting mixed coil pairs are nested to form barriers consisting of two aligned inert coils; and the mixed coil pairs may be packed within the container in a single or repeating pattern of: (1) reactive coil, (2) inert coil barrier, (3) reactive coil, (4) reactive coil, (5) inert coil barrier, (6) reactive coil.
Desirably, the coiled inert leads, e.g., electric leg wires, are disposed approximately coextensively with the coiled reactive leads, e.g., shock tube or safety fuse leads.
The detonator devices contemplated for packaging in accordance with the present invention generally comprise non-electric detonators having reactive leads and electric detonators having inert leads. Both types are usable for detonating borehole explosives in blasting or mining operations and are often used together. The following description is specific to the electric detonators having electric-conducting leg wires and non-electric detonators having shock tube leads. It should, however, be understood that the present invention is not limited to the illustrated and described specific embodiment. For example, while the current state of the art utilizes electrically-conductive wires for electric detonators, it is conceivable that at some future point other types of inert leads, such as fiber optic strands, may find a similar use. Similarly, while the current technology provides shock tube and safety fuse as the reactive leads or fuses for non-electric detonators, it is conceivable that some other type of reactive fuse may in the future be developed for the same use.
Shock tube, as is known in the art, is an extruded tube of polymer material having a hollow core and a relatively small quantity of explosive material, e.g., HMX, in powder form, and ultrafine aluminum powder, disposed on the inner wall of the tube. As used herein and in the claims, “shock tube” is meant to include any suitable detonation signal transmission tube of this type, including low velocity signal transmission tube, or the like. Electric detonators are fired by an electrical current passed through the insulated leg wires of the electric detonators. The leg wires, unlike the shock tube, contain no explosive or reactive energetic material and for this reason the coils thereof are referred to herein as inert coils.
In a specific embodiment, the present invention packages in the same container electric detonator devices having wire leg leads, the electric detonators optionally containing electronic delay timing mechanisms, and non-electric detonator devices having shock tube or safety fuse reactive leads, the non-electric detonators optionally containing electronic delay timing mechanisms. The leg wires of the electric detonator devices and the shock tube or safety fuse leads of the non-electric detonators are coiled. The electric leg wire coils are interposed between the shock tube or safety fuse coils, so that the coiled electric leg wires serve to interrupt, or at least increase the chance of interrupting, propagation from one coil of shock tube or safety fuse to another, of a reaction started by accidental initiation of a detonator within the container.
An aspect of the present invention provides for the packaging system to utilize individual electric detonator devices having their leg wires disposed in a coiled configuration (“coiled electric detonator devices”) and individual non-electric detonator devices having their reactive leads, e.g., shock tube or safety fuse leads, disposed in a coiled configuration (“coiled reactive lead detonator devices”). The coiled electric detonator devices are disposed between the coiled reactive lead detonator devices so that the leg wire coils separate the reactive lead coils from each other.
Another aspect of the present invention provides for the packaging system to comprise groups (two or more) of coiled electric detonator devices disposed between groups (two or more) of coiled reactive lead detonator devices so that the groups of inert coils separate the groups of reactive lead coils from each other.
The shock tube 12 of a typical shock tube detonator device 10 may of course be of any suitable length, but will usually range from about 8 to 180 feet (from about 2.4 to 55 meters) and may contain a mixture of HMX and aluminum in an amount, for example, of about 0.016 grams per meter. As is well known, shock tube may be initiated not only by an intense spark delivered to the interior of the tube to ignite the reactive material therein, but by detonation of a detonator in close proximity to, for example, in abutting contact with, the exterior of the shock tube. In either case, generation of an initiation signal in the shock tube will travel to and detonate the detonator to which the shock tube is attached as a fuse. Therefore, accidental detonation of a single detonator in a package containing a plurality of shock tube detonator devices can set off a chain reaction among the shock tube detonator devices in the package.
As shown in
In addition to the safety feature provided by utilizing the electric leg wire coils as barriers to propagation of initiation signals from one shock tube detonator coil to another, the packaging system of the present invention has the added advantage of providing in a single container both shock tube and electric detonator devices. These two types of detonator devices are often used in conjunction with each other, usually in a one-to-one ratio, in “hybrid” blasting schemes which utilize both shock tube detonator devices and electric wire detonator devices. Further, the lengths of shock tube 12 and electric leg wires 22 of the respective detonator devices 10, 20 which are packed in a single container may be selected to be approximately equal to each other, to facilitate installation in such “hybrid” blasting schemes.
The container in which the shock tube and electric detonator devices are packed may comprise corrugated board and as an added safety measure corrugated board divider barriers may be interspersed between some of the detonator devices and elsewhere in the container in which the detonator devices 10, 20 are packed. For example, one or more of the sides, top and bottom of container 34 of
While the invention has been described in detail with reference to specific embodiments, it will be appreciated that numerous variations may be made to the described embodiment, which variations nonetheless lie within the scope of the present invention.
This application is a U.S. national stage application of International Application No. PCT/US2016/027236 entitled “DETONATOR PACKAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD”, which has an international filing date of 13 Apr. 2016, and which claims priority of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/146,506 filed on Apr. 13, 2015 in the name of Cesar A. Olivares et al. and entitled “Detonator Packaging System and Method”.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/027236 | 4/13/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/168265 | 10/20/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1631756 | Olin | Jun 1927 | A |
2136031 | Stuart | Nov 1938 | A |
2352998 | Alexander | Jul 1944 | A |
2601919 | Darbyshire | Jul 1952 | A |
2717551 | Blackburn et al. | Sep 1955 | A |
2868360 | Donkin | Jan 1959 | A |
4222484 | Howe | Sep 1980 | A |
4286708 | Porzel | Sep 1981 | A |
4440296 | Howe et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4586602 | Levey | May 1986 | A |
5127593 | Gaston | Jul 1992 | A |
5129514 | Lilley, Jr. | Jul 1992 | A |
5494152 | Sobczak | Feb 1996 | A |
5585591 | Waldock | Dec 1996 | A |
8006622 | Munoz Saldarriaga et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199400212 | Jan 1995 | CL |
2320954 | Mar 2008 | RU |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for international application PCT/US2016/027236, international filing date of Apr. 13, 2016, dated Jul. 15, 2016, 8 pages. |
Written Opinion for international application PCT/US2016/027236, international filing date of Apr. 13, 2016, dated Jul. 15, 2016, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180080750 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62146506 | Apr 2015 | US |