This invention relates generally to a method and apparatus for gas burners, and, more particularly, a method and apparatus for improved flow characteristics for gas surface burners used in a gas-cooking product.
Atmospheric gas burners are commonly used as surface units in household gas cooking appliances. A significant factor in the performance of gas burners is their ability to withstand airflow disturbances from the surroundings, such as room drafts, rapid movement of cabinet doors, and oven door manipulation. Manipulation of the oven door is particularly troublesome because rapid openings and closings of the oven door often produce respective under-pressure and over-pressure conditions under the cook top.
Gas surface burners used in cooking products typically include a burner body including a plurality of burner ports through which a gas is distributed, and a burner cap positioned over the burner body. Almost all designs include an internal chamber of increased gas volume near the burner ports. This is important where gas flow may change over time. Providing equal flame characteristics from one port to the next is critical to prevent hot spots or uneven heating of the cooking vessels. Variations in the size of the burner port and the distance of the burner port from the venturi can also affect the flame characteristics. Adverse changes in the flame characteristic are detrimental to various performance characteristics such as inability to support flames at certain ports particularly at very low gas input rates. Gas refers to any gas or fuel air mixture.
A larger port exhibits higher flow rates than smaller ports in the same burner for a given input flow. Thus, port sizing, a static attribute of a burner, often determines the flow characteristics of a particular burner at a specific flow. This defines the distribution of flow rates across the burner ports. In some cases, it is desired that the flow characteristics be “Dynamic” or variable. One such instance would be in a burner where the flow characteristics for a region of ports are altered during high flow and unaltered during low flow conditions. For example, where the port designs are optimized for low flow, the ports produce poor and undesirable operational conditions during high flow. This is particularly evident in multiple ring burner assemblies or burners having multiple flame rings.
As described herein, embodiments of the invention overcome one or more of the above or other disadvantages known in the art.
In one aspect, a gas range having a cook top and a gas burner assembly is connected to a source of gas having a variable flow rate. The burner assembly is positioned in the cook top. The gas burner assembly has a burner body with a gas input, the gas input is in a first flow communication with a first chamber and a second flow communication with a second chamber. Each chamber has at least one port in an exterior wall for flow communication to an area external of the burner body for combustion of the gas. The second flow communication has a tripping pin to deflect flow during high flow conditions and to not deflect flow during low flow conditions. A burner cap is positioned on the burner body.
In another aspect, a method for regulating a gas output of at least one port of a gas range burner assembly having at least one gas input. The method comprising: supplying gas to a first gas input, flowing the gas from the first gas input to a first chamber of a burner body of the burner assembly where the first chamber has at least one burner port. Flowing the gas from the first gas input past a projection to a second chamber of the burner body where the second chamber has at least one burner port. The projection is configured to allow substantially uniform gas distribution through the at least one burner port of the first chamber and the at least one port of the second chamber during a minimum gas input rate, and configured to limit the gas distribution to the at least one burner port of the second chamber at a second input rate greater than the first input rate.
In yet another aspect, a burner body comprises at least one gas input. Each gas input is in a first flow communication with a first chamber and a second flow communication through an opening with a second chamber. Each chamber has at least one port in an exterior wall for flow communication to an area external of the burner body for combustion of the gas. The second flow communication comprises a tripping pin configured between the opening to the second chamber and the at least one gas input.
The following figures illustrate examples of embodiments of the invention. The figures are described in detail below.
While the methods and apparatus are herein described in the context of a gas-fired cook top, as set forth more fully below, it is contemplated that the herein described method and apparatus may find utility in other applications, including, but not limited to, gas heater devices, gas ovens, gas kilns, gas-fired meat smoker devices, and gas barbecues. In addition, the principles and teachings set forth herein may find equal applicability to combustion burners for a variety of combustible fuels. The description herein below is therefore set forth only by way of illustration rather than limitation, and is not intended to limit the practice of the herein described methods and apparatus.
Typically, for a burner chamber, flow distribution is governed by individual port areas. The larger port exhibits higher flow rates than smaller ports. Thus, port sizing, a static attribute of a burner, primarily determines this flow characteristic. This defines the distribution of flow rates across the burner ports. In some cases, it is desired that the flow characteristics be “Dynamic” or variable. One such example of a dynamic flow application would be in a burner where an interior region of ports are altered during high flow and unaltered during low flow conditions. For example, the inside ports are optimized for a particular flow and therefore produce poor and undesirable operational conditions when different flow conditions are experienced. Particularly, the ports require a minimum flow rate to prevent premature extinguishing of the cooking flame, however, due to oxygen requirements for proper burning, also exhibit poor performance during high flow conditions.
Cook top 114 includes four gas fueled burner assemblies 200 which are positioned in spaced apart pairs positioned adjacent each side of cook top 114. A recessed area 124 of cook top 114 surrounds each burner assembly 200. Recessed area 124 is positioned below an upper surface 126 of cook top 114 and serve to catch any spills from cooking vessels (not shown in
While cook top 114 includes four grates 128 positioned over four burner assemblies 200 it is contemplated that greater or fewer numbers of grates could be employed with a greater or fewer number of burners without departing from the scope of the herein described methods and apparatus.
Burner assembly 200 is mounted on a support surface, such as cook top 114, of a gas-cooking appliance such as a range or a cook top. The cap 202 is disposed over the top of burner body 206. Cap 206 can be fixedly attached or can simply rest on burner body 206 for easy removal. Burner assembly 200 also includes at least one igniter (not shown) extending through an opening in burner body 206. While one type of burner is described and illustrated, the herein described methods and apparatus are applicable to other types of burners, such as stamped aluminum burners and separately mounted orifice burners.
As shown in
The flow in
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2257339 | Parker | Sep 1941 | A |
2447211 | Rousseau | Aug 1948 | A |
3796535 | De Gouville | Mar 1974 | A |
5133658 | Le Monnier De Gouville et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5490778 | Meijer | Feb 1996 | A |
6035846 | Saleri | Mar 2000 | A |
6089219 | Kodera et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6132205 | Harneit | Oct 2000 | A |
6135764 | Kwiatek | Oct 2000 | A |
6315552 | Haynes et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325619 | Dane | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6439881 | Haynes et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6439882 | Haynes et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6443726 | Atemboski et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6602068 | Atemboski et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6875008 | Martin et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6889685 | Dane | May 2005 | B2 |
7001176 | Bettinzoli | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7017572 | Cadima | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7083123 | Molla | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20040029063 | Bettinzoli | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040195399 | Molla | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040241604 | Cadima | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060121402 | Bettinzoli | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080210216 | Rossi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080241777 | Rossi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2005073630 | Aug 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090162801 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |