This invention relates generally to a method and apparatus for gas burners, and, more particularly, a method and apparatus for reduced circumference gas surface burner used in a gas-cooking product.
Atmospheric gas burners are commonly used as surface units in household gas cooking appliances. A significant factor in the performance of gas burners is their ability to withstand airflow disturbances from the surroundings, such as room drafts, rapid movement of cabinet doors, and oven door manipulation. Manipulation of the oven door is particularly troublesome because rapid openings and closings of the oven door often produce respective under-pressure and over-pressure conditions under the cook top.
These under-pressure and over-pressure conditions cause related pressure variations in the gas entering the burner chamber. Gas refers to any gas or fuel air mixture. The pressure variations can translate into flow disturbances at the burner ports causing flame extinction.
Some commercially available gas burners employ dedicated expansion chambers to attempt to improve stability performance. These expansion chambers are intended to dampen flow disturbances before such disturbances reach a respective stability flame. This damping is typically attempted by utilizing a large area expansion between an expansion chamber inlet and an expansion chamber exit, typically expanding by a factor of about ten. Accordingly, the velocity of a flow disturbance entering a burner throat is intended to be reduced by a factor of about ten prior to reaching a respective stability flame, thereby reducing the likelihood of flame extinction. Large area expansion and disturbance damping are not typically present in conventional main burner ports, making conventional main burner ports susceptible to flame extinction, especially at low burner input rates. Simmer stability is generally improved as the area expansion ratio is increased. If an expansion chamber inlet is sized too small, however, the gas entering an expansion chamber may be insufficient to sustain a stable flame at the expansion chamber port.
Cook top 114 includes four gas fueled burner assemblies 200 which are positioned in spaced apart pairs positioned adjacent each side of cook top 114. Each pair of burner assemblies 200 is surrounded by a recessed area 124 of cook top 114. Recessed areas 124 are positioned below an upper surface 126 of cook top 114 and serve to catch any spills from cooking utensils (not shown in
While, cook top 114 includes two pairs of grates 128 positioned over two pairs of burner assemblies 200 it is contemplated that greater or fewer numbers of grates could be employed with a greater or fewer number of burners without departing from the scope of the herein described methods and apparatus. Further, the burner assembly may rest directly on the cook top or within recesses.
Gas burners are subjected to pressure fluctuations both above the cook top on which they are mounted, as well as below. These pressures fluctuations can extinguish the flames of a burner when it is turned down to a very low setting. It is well known in the art that the addition of a stability chamber can improve stability at low flame settings. However, this concept requires the venturi tube to be located substantially adjacent to the inlet of the stability chamber. In traditional practice, the venturi is located in the center of round burners to provide uniform distribution of gas. Thus, the minimum diameter of the chamber of a burner that has a centrally located venturi and adjacent stability chamber can be approximated by the equation: Diameter of chamber=Diameter of venturi+2× radial length of stability chamber. Because the stability chamber requires a finite volume and length to function properly, a designer is often left with a burner diameter larger than desired in order to fit these features. Larger diameter burners are often not desired when space constraints, part cost, or efficiency demands are considered.
In one aspect, a gas burner assembly connected to a source of gas. The gas burner assembly has a burner body. The burner body has a generally enclosed chamber with a central axis and is configured with a generally circular wall. Ports are formed at the top of the wall and are in flow communication to an area external the burner body for combustion of the gas. A venturi directs the flow of gas from the source of gas into the chamber through an opening where the opening is offset from the central axis of the chamber. The burner body further has a stability chamber.
In another aspect, a gas range is provided. The gas range has a cook top and a gas burner assembly positioned in the cook top. The burner assembly is connected to a source of gas. The gas burner assembly has a burner body. The burner body comprises a chamber. The chamber has a generally circular wall with a central axis. A venturi directs the flow of gas from the source of gas into the chamber through an opening where the opening is offset from the central axis of the chamber. The burner body also comprises a stability chamber. Ports are formed at the top of the wall and are in flow communication with an area external the burner body for combustion of the gas. A burner cap is positioned on the burner body.
While the methods and apparatus are herein described in the context of a gas-fired cook top, as set forth more fully below, it is contemplated that the herein described method and apparatus may find utility in other applications, including, but not limited to, gas heater devices, gas ovens, gas kilns, gas-fired meat smoker devices, and gas barbecues. In addition, the principles and teachings set forth herein may find equal applicability to combustion burners for a variety of combustible fuels. The description herein below is therefore set forth only by way of illustration rather than limitation, and is not intended to limit the practice of the herein described methods and apparatus.
Typically, for a burner, flow distribution is governed by individual port areas. A larger port from a chamber exhibits higher relative flow rates than smaller ports from the same chamber. Thus, port sizing, a static attribute of a burner, primarily determines percentage of total flow exhibited by a port. A secondary consideration is the distance a particular port is from the venturi. These attributes define the distribution of flow rates across the burner ports.
Cook top 114 includes four gas fueled burner assemblies 200 which are positioned in spaced apart pairs positioned adjacent each side of cook top 114. Each pair of burner assemblies 200 is surrounded by a recessed area 124 of cook top 114. Recessed areas 124 are positioned below an upper surface 126 of cook top 114 and serve to catch any spills from cooking utensils (not shown in
While, cook top 114 includes two pairs of grates 128 positioned over two pairs of burner assemblies 200 it is contemplated that greater or fewer numbers of grates could be employed with a greater or fewer number of burners without departing from the scope of the herein described methods and apparatus. Further, the burner assembly may rest directly on the cook top or within recesses.
Gas burners are subjected to pressure fluctuations both above the cook top on which they are mounted, as well as below. These pressures fluctuations can extinguish the flames of a burner when it is turned down to a very low setting. It is well known in the art that the addition of a stability chamber can improve stability at low flame settings. However, this concept requires the venturi tube to be located substantially adjacent to the inlet of the stability chamber. In traditional practice, the venturi is located in the center of round burners to provide uniform distribution of gas. Thus, the minimum diameter of the chamber of a burner that has a centrally located venturi and adjacent stability chamber can be approximated by the equation: Diameter of chamber=Diameter of venturi+2× radial length of stability chamber. Because the stability chamber requires a finite volume and length to function properly, a designer is often left with a burner diameter larger than desired in order to fit these features. Larger diameter burners are often not desired when space constraints, part cost, or efficiency demands are considered.
The trend in the burner industry has been to move towards burners having multiple port rings and multiple stages as shown in
Referring now to
The venturi 204 is offset from the axis 224 and as a result, unlike the prior art burners, the diameter of the burner body 200 is not directly determined by features internal to the burner body. As a result of this improvement, the stability chamber 206 remains a useful size without a portion of stability chamber 206 being outside the annular ring of ports. The height of the burner body 200 provides height for the burner to be proximate to cooking vessel. This can be particularly important as shown in
Burner ports 212, 214, 216, 218 are at the top of a wall 222 of the burner body 200. The wall 222 is generally annular and is formed about a central axis 224. Above the burner ports 212, 214, 216, 218 is a burner cap 230. The burner cap 230 (shown in
Because the venturi 204 is offset, from axis 224 each pair of ports 212, 214, 216, 218 are angled and shaped differently to optimize flow patterns based on the distance to the venturi. The longitudinal axis of ports 212, 214, 216, 218 are not specifically in radial alignment to either the center axis 224 or the center of the venturi 204. Each port is configured to promote flow and minimize obstruction. Ports 218, which are proximate to the venturi 204, can be subjected to substantial flow variations. To discourage the flow variations from affecting the burner flame ports 218 are taken out of linear alignment with venturi 204.
Referring to
The methods and apparatus described herein facilitate providing substantially higher heat outputs on gas surface burners, thereby improving an elapsed time to bring a food load to a desired temperature. By reducing the diameter of the burner heat transfer to smaller cooking vessels is improved affording improved efficiency and reduced energy requirements.
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5464004 | Maughan | Nov 1995 | A |
5800159 | Maughan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5899681 | Maughan | May 1999 | A |
6132205 | Harneit | Oct 2000 | A |
6135764 | Kwiatek | Oct 2000 | A |
6325619 | Dane | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6439881 | Haynes et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
20040241604 | Cadima | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060121402 | Bettinzoli | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11270811 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2005140435 | Jun 2005 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090159071 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |