The invention relates to improvements in respect of performing cataract surgery, and the result thereof, by application of a laser system.
To date, the following steps are typically performed on the eye during cataract surgery, which eye has been dilated by drops (i.e. the pupil has been dilated by medicaments) and is under local anesthetic:
As an alternative to the previously used instruments (surgical microscope, phacoemulsification apparatus, also referred to as phaco machine), or in addition thereto, use is made of a femtosecond laser system (fs-laser) for:
The use of a cutting laser makes it possible to perform more precisely positioned cuts, which are more defined in terms of their dimensions. As a result of the additional implementation of a navigation, e.g. by means of optical coherence tomography in conjunction with the laser system, the processes of cutting and dividing can be automated, without tissue worth retaining, e.g. the posterior capsular bag, being injured. As a result, the significant risks of manual/visual cut guidance by the operator are avoided and even medical practitioners with less surgical experience achieve a lower complication rate and better refractive results.
WO09039302 describes such a laser system: a laser is guided onto the eye via a deflection mirror and an objective. An x/y/z scanner moves this laser beam in the eye and performs cuts. The z-scan can also be embodied as a displacement of the objective along the optical axis. There, OCT (optical coherence tomography) is used for navigation. An fs-laser or a ps-laser without more detailed specification is mentioned as a laser. The laser system is designed as an independent system, with the imaging required for the navigation being integrated therein. It operates independently from phaco machines and surgical microscopes. This allows the laser cuts to be able to be performed before suctioning off the lens fragments and before inserting the lens, e.g. in a different spatial area. However, this assumes a modified process organization in the hospital or the surgical practice. Alternatively, the laser system must be pushed to-and-fro in an intricate and laborious fashion in a conventionally organized operating room. An expensive fs-laser is necessary for the implementation; the aperture is restricted as a result of the large working distance, and this leads to a majority of the residual energy of the laser being radiated in the direction of the retina and constituting a safety risk.
A different laser system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,621,637, which is designed only for refractive corneal surgery. It is a system in which a laser is swiveled into the surgical region between the microscope lens of the surgical microscope and the eye by use of a swivel arm. A horizontal flap-cut plane is made in the cornea by a slow movement of the objective along one direction and a rapid movement of a tilting mirror, which is housed in an independent module. The advantage of this system lies in the simple integration into the corneal-surgery procedure. By way of example, the observation by the operator is only interrupted during the swiveling-in and during the flap cut.
The use of an expensive fs-laser and the long scan time by the objective scan were found to be disadvantageous, although the latter is acceptable during a corneal-flap cut because only one cut needs to be made. Furthermore, as a result of the principles thereof, the depth of focus in this system is not deep enough to be able to perform cuts in the lens, and it lacks a 3D navigation, which is necessary for lens cuts. Moreover, the overall device is too voluminous for the typical operation situation (surgical microscope, phaco machine).
It is an object of the invention to develop a laser system for cataract surgery, which has a more compact design and can therefore be integrated more easily into the existing system surroundings, is more cost-effective but nevertheless meets the requirements of laser-lens surgery, such as large aperture (in order not to burden the retina and in order to obtain a sufficiently small focus) and high scan speed (in order to be able to perform all necessary steps, more particularly for comminuting the lens, within approximately 1 minute).
In a first variant (A1), this object is achieved by a laser- and navigation system as an add-on module for a surgical microscope, including:
This variant is particularly suitable for a large number of cuts when comminuting the lens.
In an alternative variant (A2), this object is achieved by a laser- and navigation system with add-on modules for a surgical microscope, including:
This variant is likewise particularly suitable for a large number of cuts when comminuting the lens, and wherein the microscope already contains coupling-in means for a laser, e.g. also via the optical interface of a co-observation optical system.
In a further alternative variant (B1), this object is achieved by a laser- and navigation system as an add-on module for a surgical microscope, including:
This variant is particularly suitable for a relatively small number of cuts, e.g. if only a cross cut of the lens is intended to be cut, or else if only tough, dense cataract regions are intended to be cut.
In a further variant (B2), this object is achieved by a laser- and navigation system with add-on modules for a surgical microscope, including:
This variant is particularly suitable for a relatively small number of cuts, e.g. if only a cross cut of the lens is intended to be cut, or else if only tough, dense cataract regions are intended to be cut and when the surgical microscope already contains coupling-in means for a laser, e.g. also via the optical interface of a co-observation optical system.
Here, the fs-laser preferably has a pulse duration of between 100 fs and 1000 fs, with a pulse energy of between 0.10 μJ and 10.00 μJ and repetition frequencies of between 50 kHz and 500 kHz. What this energy and these pulse durations achieve is that the laser can produce a vapor/plasma bubble in a tissue volume with a diameter of approximately 5 micrometers, with only small effects being induced outside of this volume. The high repetition frequency, in conjunction with the fast scanners, affords the possibility of, within one minute, being able to produce at least 8 vertical/or radial and 2 horizontal cuts in the lens, which has a thickness of between 3-6 mm.
The ps-laser preferably has a pulse duration of between 1 ps and 20 ps, with a pulse energy of between 1 μJ and 200 μJ and repetition frequencies of between 25 kHz and 150 kHz. What this energy and these pulse durations achieve is that the laser produces a vapor/plasma bubble in a tissue volume with a diameter of approximately 10-15 micrometers. However, unlike the fs-laser, the ps-laser affects a larger volume on account of the thermal effects and pressure effects. However, this is largely uncritical, seeing as the lens is in any case removed entirely during the cataract operation and the cuts to the cornea and in the capsular bag need not satisfy the precision (e.g. in respect of coarseness, dimensional accuracy) required for optical imaging. However, the pulse duration and energy should not lie substantially above the specified values because otherwise there is a significant increase in the risk of injury to the corneal endothelial cells by pressure peaks or to the anterior capsular bag segments remaining in the eye after the intervention.
What holds true for both lasers is that in the case of relatively small lenses or if the cuts are only performed in the dense regions of the lens or if the cuts only serve to replace the initial ultrasound cross cut, fewer cuts than the aforementioned approximately 8 are also expedient, and so the repetition frequency or the overall time for the cuts may be reduced.
However, in the case of a dense or tough cataract or cataract regions—identifiable e.g. from the stray-light data from the detector unit—the number of cuts overall may also be increased, or else there may be a local increase in the cut density only in the dense or tough cataract regions. In particular, the distance between 2 cut surfaces can be reduced to the typical geometry/dimension of the suction-head inlet, or to less than that. As a result, the fragments of the lens need not be comminuted much more by a subsequent phaco step. This can significantly reduce the ultrasound energy or, ideally, this may allow the use of ultrasound to be dispensed with entirely.
The invention furthermore includes a method for laser-assisted eye surgery, in which the laser-beam source is flexibly connected to a scanning and focusing module, which, mechanically balanced in direct contact with the eye, is used for intraocular navigation and therapy.
The invention will be explained in more detail in the following text on the basis of the drawings, in which:
In one focusing position, the objective 3 is able to focus onto the rear side of the lens 9 of the eye and, in another focusing position, said objective is able to focus onto the front side of the lens 9 of the eye; advantageously it is additionally also able to focus onto the front side of the cornea 10. The focus drive 12 serves to shift the position of the focus. At the same time, the objective 3 must be able to cover a scanning field with the diameter of a pupil dilated by drops or from the center of the pupil to the sclera. It must likewise have an aperture large enough to ensure that the light is sufficiently defocused on the retina so that no injury threshold of the retina is exceeded by the light cone during a treatment duration of approximately 1 minute. That is to say the through-focusing region is greater than 10-12 mm, at least greater than 1 mm, in a field with a diameter of greater than 4 mm and an aperture of greater than approximately 0.20. In order to achieve this in the case of a small overall size and low weight, aspherical or free-form lens surfaces and/or diffractive elements and/or a contact lens 12 (with planar contact surface, or a contact surface matched to the corneal curvature) and/or adaptive mirror surfaces may be used. The contact lens 11 is affixed on the eye by means of negative pressure.
By way of example, two fast galvo-scanners are options for the scanners 6, 7. However, a scanner that scans along the meridian and is itself mechanically rotated, or the beam of which is rotated, by e.g. a prism, (so that there is a meridian-rotation) is also an alternative option. As a further alternative option, use can also be made of a MEMS scanner that can move along 2 axes. In the embodiment illustrated in
However, the objective 3 may also be installed in the beam path of the laser, upstream of where said beam path merges into the observation beam path 14 of the microscope 1, e.g. between the two scan mirrors 6, 7, as illustrated in
A fastener 15 connects the module 2 to the microscope 1 e.g. such that it can swivel. The module furthermore has an entry window 16 for the observation beam path 14, which entry window may also be embodied as a matching lens. The laser beam 8 is coupled into the module 2 via a feed 17, which may be embodied as a fiber or else as a free-beam apparatus.
In variant A2, the laser is firstly coupled into the microscope, and the latter transmits the laser into the objective 3. This is illustrated in
In variants B1 and B2, the module 2, which can be added on to a surgical or stereo microscope 1, contains an objective 3 with mechanical displacement of the focus both along the optical axis of the eye and laterally in the x/y-direction. Here the same conditions for the necessary adjustment tracks of the focus of the objective 3 hold true as in the variants A1 and A2.
A confocal detector (not illustrated here) or a planar detector serves as a detection unit. The confocal signal serves for determining the boundaries, as is described in DE 103 23 422, the entire content of which is incorporated by reference. Together with the non-confocal component, this allows a scattering intensity to be determined, and this scattering intensity can be used to control the laser in terms of one or even more of the following parameters: pulse energy, pulse duration, repetition frequency and/or scan speed. The reflected light may optionally be decoupled via a combination of wave plate and polarization splitter. An OCT unit may also be considered as detection unit.
So that the overall module 2 is made manageable from a mechanical standpoint for an operator, the structural elements in the module 2 are arranged and distributed such that the center of gravity of the module 2 is situated below the objective of the surgical microscope head 1, but it is at least situated along the nadir from the center of gravity of said microscope head.
Furthermore, a device 24 for generating a minimum contact pressure of the module 2 on the contact lens 11 is integrated into the module 2. This can be implemented by a pressure transducer, e.g. by a spring or an electromechanical pressure actuator, which, from the module, presses against the contact lens or the eye with a defined force, the latter optionally being fed-back via a sensor. This device can also be able to move (pressure-distance transducer) the contact lens 11 in the direction of the eye over the small distances (1 mm).
In order to aid integration and simplify the operation, provision is made—integrated into the module or provided externally—for a controller/control unit that supports the following operational procedure:
The invention is not restricted to the illustrated exemplary embodiments; developments by a person skilled in the art do not depart from the scope of protection.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102010022298.4 | May 2010 | DE | national |
61349042 | May 2010 | US | national |
The present application is a National Phase entry of PCT Application No. PCT/EP2011/002608, filed May 26, 2011, which claims priority from German Application No 10 2010 022 298.4, filed May 27, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/349,042, filed May 27, 2010, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/002608 | 5/26/2011 | WO | 00 | 11/27/2012 |