The present disclosure generally relates to the technical field of diesel engine, and more specifically, relates to an apparatus and method for controlling a high pressure common rail system of the diesel engine.
With the increasing aggravation of energy crisis, various energy consumption technologies have become focus issues in the combustion engine industry all over the world. Just due to this reason, diesel engines have attracted more and more attention. Compared with gasoline engines, diesel engines have many advantages: reduced exhaust gas emission, better acceleration performance at a lower vehicle speed, lower average fuel consumption, and more driving fun. However, as compared with gasoline engines, emission control is a challenge for diesel engines. In order to meet emission standards, a high pressure common rail technology has become a hot topic in the industry.
In a high pressure common rail fuel injection system (hereinafter referred to a high pressure common rail system) of an existing diesel engine, a PID type control policy is employed for controlling fuel pressure within a common rail tube chamber (i.e., rail pressure), which requires massive calibration work. Besides, based on the existing PID control policy, in some operation conditions of an engine, there would be a large gap between the actual value and the target value of the rail pressure, which causes a relatively large error between the actual fuel injection amount and the target fuel injection amount in a fuel injection system, which therefore directly affects the consistency between the power of the engine and fuel injection within each cylinder. Therefore, it is crucial for improving engine performance and reducing the calibration work to develop an advanced fuel pressure control policy for the high-pressure common rail system. To this end, there is a need in the art for improving the control technology for the high pressure common rail system.
In view of the above, the present invention discloses an apparatus and method for controlling a high pressure common rail system of a diesel engine so as to overcome or at least partially eliminate at least some of the drawbacks in the prior art.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for controlling a high pressure common rail system of a diesel engine. The apparatus may comprise an operation condition parameter acquiring module configured to acquire operation condition parameters associated with the high pressure common rail system; a control quantity determining module coupled to the operation condition parameter acquiring module and configured to determine a control quantity for controlling the high-pressure common rail system based on the operation condition parameters, a target value of the fuel pressure within a high pressure common rail tube chamber and a control model designed based on a physical model characterizing the high pressure common rail system, wherein the control quantity is an equivalent cross-section area of electromagnetic value of a flow metering unit; and a drive signal determining module coupled to the control quantity determining module and configured to determine a drive signal for driving the flow metering unit based on the determined control quantity.
In a preferred embodiment according to the present invention, the apparatus may further comprise: an observation value determining module coupled to the operation condition parameter acquiring module and the control quantity determining module and configured to determine, based on the operation condition parameters and an observer model designed based on the physical model, an observation value of fuel pressure within a high pressure fuel pump plunger chamber, for using by the control quantity determining module in determining the control quantity.
According to a yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the observer model may be designed by adding an adjustment term to an equation for the fuel pressure within the plunger pump chamber and to an equation for the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber in the physical model, respectively, and by selecting an adjustment factor to make both adjusted equations stable and converged.
In a further preferred embodiment according to the present invention, the observation value determining module may be further configured to determine an observation value of fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber based on the operation condition parameters and the observer model, for using by the control quantity determining module in determining the control quantity.
In yet another preferred embodiment according to the present invention, the operation condition parameters may include: high pressure fuel pump plunger stroke, high pressure fuel pump plunger movement line speed, fuel pressure within the plunger pump chamber, and fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the physical model can be characterized by: an equation for fuel outflow of the flow metering unit; an equation for fuel pressure within the plunger pump chamber; an equation for fuel outflow of the plunger pump chamber; an equation for fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber; and an equation for fuel injection flow of a fuel injector.
In a further preferred embodiment according to the present invention, the control model may comprise a feedforward controller, and said control quantity may include a feedforward control component.
In another preferred embodiment according to the present invention, the feedforward control component uFF can be expressed as
wherein b1, b2 and b3 are control coefficients which are determined based on the acquired operation condition parameters and constant parameters associated with the physical model; and θ denotes high pressure fuel pump plunger movement line speed.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the control model may comprise a feedback controller, and said control quantity may include a feedback control component.
In a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, the feedback control component UFB can be expressed as
wherein e denotes an error between the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber and its target value; b3 is a control coefficient determined based on the acquired operation condition parameters and constant parameters associated with the physical model; and kP, ki and kd are control coefficients respectively for proportional control, integral control and differential control and kP, ki and kd are selected to stabilize the high pressure common rail system.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for controlling a high pressure common rail system of a diesel engine. The method may comprise: acquiring operation condition parameters associated with the high pressure common rail system; determining a control quantity for controlling the high-pressure common rail system based on the operation condition parameters, a target value of fuel pressure within a high pressure common rail tube chamber and a control model designed based on a physical model characterizing the high pressure common rail system, wherein the control quantity is an equivalent cross-section area of electromagnetic value of a flow metering unit; and determining a drive signal for driving the flow metering unit based on the determined control quantity.
According to embodiments of the present invention and particularly various preferred embodiments, the high pressure common rail system is controlled based on the physical model charactering the high pressure common rail system of a diesel engine. Because the physical model of the high pressure common rail system of the diesel engine is suitable to a working process of the system in any operation condition, the physical model-based technical solution of the present invention may achieve a relatively accurate injection pressure and a fast system response, which in turn may reduce the deviation between the actual value of the rail pressure and its target value, and minimize it in preferred embodiments. In addition, a control model designed based on the physical model of the high-pressure common rail fuel system can be quantized, which thus greatly reduces the calibration workload for the control model, and improves the efficiency and functionality of the high pressure common rail fuel injection system of the engine.
The above and other features of the present invention will become more apparent through detailed description of the embodiments as illustrated with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like reference signs indicate like or similar components. In the accompanying drawings,
Hereinafter, an apparatus and method for controlling a high pressure common rail system as provided by the present invention will be depicted in detail through embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that these embodiments are provided only to enable those skilled in the art to better understand and further implement the present invention, not intended for limiting the scope of the present invention in any manner.
Additionally, the term “operation condition parameter” used herein indicates any value that can indicate a physical quantity of the (target or actual) physical state or operation condition of the engine. Moreover, in the context of this specification, term “parameter(s)” may be used interchangeably with the physical quantity represented thereby. For example, “a parameter indicating a camshaft rotary speed” has an equivalent meaning herein with “camshaft rotary speed.” Moreover, in the context of the present specification, P denotes a certain physical quantity, then {dot over (P)} denotes a derivative of P with respect to time, i.e, P's change ratio with time; {circumflex over (P)} denotes an observation value of the physical quantity P, i.e., filtered measured value (the measured value comprising noise); P=P(x) denotes that the parameter P is a polynomial of x, i.e., P is a function of x, and P=P(x1, x2) denotes that the parameter P is the polynomial of x1 and x2.
Besides, the term “acquire” and its derivatives used herein include various means currently known or to be developed in future, for example, collecting, measuring, reading, estimating, predicting, observing, etc.; the term “measure” and its derivatives used here include various means currently known or to be developed in the future, such as means of directly measuring, reading, computing, estimating, etc.
Next, the structural diagram of a high pressure common rail system of a diesel engine will be first depicted with reference to
As shown in
As shown in
The high pressure common rail tube chamber 117 plays a role of an accumulator for reserving high-pressure fuel. In general, the pressure of the high pressure fuel may usually reach as high as 120 Mpa to 200 Mpa. However, it should be noted that, for different high pressure common rail systems, the pressures can be slightly different.
The fuel injector 111 is a key component in the high pressure common rail system, which plays a role of injecting the high pressure fuel in the high pressure common rail tube chamber 117 into each cylinder at the optimal fuel injection timing, with the optimal fuel injection volume, and at the optimal fuel injection flow through controlling the opening and closing of the fuel injector drive electromagnetic valve 110 in accordance with the drive signal 108 from the ECU.
In addition, a pressure sensor is usually mounted on the high pressure common rail tube chamber. The pressure sensor provides a rail pressure signal 109 of the high pressure fuel rail (i.e., the measured value of the fuel pressure within the high pressure common tube chamber), to the ECU 118. The ECU 118, as a core of the high pressure common rail system, is configured to provide, based on various operation condition parameters of the fuel system (for example, the rail pressure signal 109), various control signals (or drive signals) such as the drive signal 104 driving the flow metering unit (to control the extent of opening of the flowing metering unit), the drive signal 108 for driving the fuel injector electromagnetic valve 110 (to control the opening and closing of the fuel injector electromagnetic valve), etc.
Besides, in the system as shown in
As can be seen from the
Therefore, in order to solve this technical problem, the inventors design a technical solution for controlling a high pressure common rail system to obtain a desired rail pressure. The inventors apply the knowledge about a model of the high pressure common rail system to system control, so as to achieve an effective control that cannot be implemented in the prior art through leveraging the model knowledge about the fuel flow metering valve, the high pressure fuel pump, the high pressure common rail tube chamber, and the fuel injector. Hereinafter, detailed depiction will be made to the technical solution as provided by the present invention with reference to particular embodiments, such that those skilled in the art can easily understand and implement the present invention based on the disclosure here.
First, reference will be made to
As shown in
Hereinafter, an exemplary embodiment will be depicted with reference to examples to illustrate how to build a physical model of the high pressure common rail system. It should be noted that in the embodiments of the present invention, any appropriate manner may be used to build a physical model characterizing the high pressure common rail system, and it is not limited the exemplary embodiment shown here.
In this exemplary embodiment, the physical model of the high pressure common rail system can be characterized by the following: an expression for fuel outflow of the flow metering unit; an expression for the fuel pressure within the plunger pump chamber; an expression for the fuel outflow of the plunger pump chamber; an expression for the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber; and an expression for the fuel injection flow of a fuel injector. Hereinafter, these expressions will be depicted in detail. However, it should be noted that it is only for exemplary purposes, and the present invention is not limited thereto.
Physical Model of the High Pressure Common Rail
In order to consider physical relationships between major mechanical, hydraulic, and control components of the high pressure common rail fuel system while designing a model-based rail pressure control model by leveraging the given physical model, the following hypotheses are made first:
Given the above hypotheses, the following relationship equations may be derived.
1. Equation for Fuel Outflow of the Flow Metering Unit
For the flow metering unit, it may derive, for example, the following equation for the fuel outflow:
wherein
For the high pressure pump, for example, the following equation about the fuel pressure within the plunger pump chamber may be derived:
wherein,
ωc denotes the fuel pump camshaft rotating speed.
3. Equation for Fuel Outflow of the Plunger Pump Chamber
For the high pressure pump, for example, the following equation about the fuel outflow of the plunger pump chamber may be derived:
wherein,
For the high pressure common rail tube chamber, for example, the following equation may be determined:
wherein,
For the high pressure common rail tube chamber, for example, the following equation may be determined:
wherein,
Based on the physical model of a high pressure common rail system as given hereinabove, a control model for the system may be designed. Hereinafter, a control model designed based on the system physical model will be depicted with reference to embodiments. However, it should be noted that these embodiments are provided only for illustration purposes, and the present invention is not limited thereto. Instead, under the teaching of the present invention, those skilled in the art may make various modifications and alternations.
Control Model Design
The control model design intends to make, under various operation conditions of an engine, the rail pressure measured value approach to the rail pressure target value by performing a closed-loop control on the fuel pressure within the high pressure fuel rail. Hereinafter, there is provided an exemplary embodiment of designing a control model based on the physical model of the high pressure common rail system.
First, Pr,des may be used to denote the rail pressure target value of the high pressure common rail tube chamber, and Pr is used to denote the actual measured value of the rail pressure. Then, the error between the actual measured value Pr and the target value Pr,des may be expressed as:
e=Pr−Pr,des (Equation 6)
By moving the target valued Pr,des to the side of the error e, the following equation may be derived:
Pr=e+Pr,des (Equation 7)
By taking the time derivative of both sides of equation 7, it may derive the following equation:
ė={dot over (P)}r (Equation 8)
ë={umlaut over (P)}r (Equation 9)
By taking the time derivative of the left and right sides of the aforementioned equation 4, the following equation may be derived:
By taking the time derivative of both sides of the aforementioned equation for the fuel outflow of the plunger pump chamber, the following may be derived:
Likewise, by taking the time derivative of both sides of the aforementioned equation for the fuel injection flow of the fuel injector, the following may be derived:
By substituting the above derived equations 11 and 12 into the equation 10, then equation 10 may be further simplified as:
By substituting the aforementioned equation for fuel outflow of the flow metering unit (i.e., equation 1); the equation for the fuel pressure within the plunger pump chamber (i.e., equation 2); and the equation for fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber (equation 4) into the right end of the equation 13, and considering
the following equation may be derived:
Through further arrangement, the equation 14 may be expressed as:
As depicted in the aforementioned equations 1 to 5, βp is the polynomial of Pp, βr is the polynomial of Pr, Vp is the function of h(θ), and Qr and Qinj are functions of Pp and Pr. Therefore, coefficients b1, b2, and b3 are polynomials of Pp and Pr, and they may be determined based on operation condition parameters and constant parameters associated with the physical model. Specifically, b1 may be determined based on the fuel pressure value PP within the plunger pump chamber, fuel pressure value Pr within the high pressure common rail chamber, pump plunger stroke h(θ)(for determining Vp), and constant parameters associated with the physical model, wherein these constants include the compressed air pressure Pcyl within the cylinder, fuel injector flow coefficient Cinj, fuel injector equivalent cross-sectional area Ainj fuel density ρ, flow coefficient Cr of one-way valve from the plunger pump chamber to the high pressure common rail tube chamber, equivalent cross-section area Ar of the one-way valve from the plunger pump chamber to the high pressure common rail tube chamber, and high pressure common rail tube chamber volume Vr, and etc. Likewise, b2 may be determined based on the fuel pressure value Pp within the plunger pump chamber, fuel pressure value Pr within the high pressure common rail chamber, pump plunger stroke h(θ) (for determining Vp) and constants associated with the physical model, wherein these constants include high pressure common rail tube chamber volume Vr, the plunger pump chamber cross-sectional area Ap, the flow coefficient Cr the of the one-way valve from the plunger pump chamber to the high pressure common rail tube chamber, the equivalent cross-sectional area Ar of the one-way valve from the plunger pump chamber to the high-pressure tube chamber, high-pressure common rail tube chamber volume Vr and fuel density ρ. Similarly, b3 may be determined based on the fuel pressure value PP within the plunger pump chamber, fuel pressure value Pr within the high pressure common rail chamber, the pump plunger stroke h(θ)(for determining Vp) and constant parameters of the physical model, wherein these constant parameters include the low-pressure end fuel supply pressure Pu, fuel density ρ, the flow coefficient Cu of the flow metering unit, the flow coefficient Cr of the one-way valve from the plunger pump chamber to the high pressure common rail tube chamber, the equivalent cross-sectional area Ar of the one-way valve from the plunger pump chamber to the high-pressure tube chamber, and the high pressure common rail tube chamber volume Vr.
(1) Based on the above equations 9 and 15, and let {umlaut over (θ)}+kd{dot over (θ)}+kpθ+ki∫θ=0, the control model may be designed as follows:
Actually, the control model includes two parts. One part thereof includes a feedforward control term:
wherein b1, b2 and b3 denote control coefficients, and as aforementioned, they may be determined based on the acquired operation condition parameters and constant parameters associated with the physical model; θ denotes a high pressure fuel pump plunger movement line speed.
The other part includes a PID feedback control term:
wherein b3 denotes a control coefficient, similarly as aforementioned, which may be determined based on the acquired operation condition parameters and constant parameters associated with the physical model; kp, kl and kd denote control coefficients for proportional control, integral control, and differential control, respectively. For the feedback control term, appropriate kp, kl and kd gain values may be selected to ensure stability of the high pressure common rail system. In other words, it should guarantee that the eigen root of the following equation is located at the left half plane of the plane:
{umlaut over (θ)}+kd{dot over (θ)}+kpθ+ki∫θ=0 (Equation 18)
Namely, it guarantees e→0 when t→0. In this way, kp, kl and kd gain values may be derived.
However, as known to those skilled in the art, the control model may include a feedforward control term, a feedback control term, or a combination of both. Moreover, the feedback control is not limited to PID control, and PI control is also feasible in practical application. Therefore, the present invention is not limited to the exemplary embodiments provided herein.
Therefore, in one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the operation condition parameters that need to be measured may include: the high pressure pump plunger stroke h, the high pressure fuel pump plunger movement line speed θ, the fuel pressure PP within the plunger pump chamber and the fuel pressure Pr within the high voltage common rail tube chamber.
These parameters are those required for determining the control quantity based on the control model. However, the present invention is not limited thereto. More parameters or other alternative parameters may also be measured, so as to calculate or determine these operation condition parameters from these parameters. For example, for a high pressure pump plunger stroke, which is the function of the camshaft rotating angle; thus, the camshaft rotating angle may be obtained, and the high pressure pump plunger stroke may be computed based on the physical relationship between the camshaft rotating angle and the high pressure pump plunger stroke.
It should be noted that the above provided control model is only an exemplary embodiment. Various variations for the control model are possible. For example, in some operation conditions, one or more parameters or aspects in the above equations may not be considered in the physical model, and/or new parameters or aspects about the engine high pressure fuel system may be added into the physical model. Actually, based on the above inspiration and teaching given in the present invention, those skilled in the art may design and implement any appropriate control model according to specific needs and conditions.
Besides, the control model is preferably pre-determined based on the physical model; in this way, during the running period of the engine, the value of the control quantity may be determined directly based on various operation condition parameters and the system target value. In this way, the system response speed may be accelerated and the control efficiency may be improved.
In the aforementioned operation condition parameters, some parameters may be directly measured through measurement devices such as a sensor, for example, fuel pressure Pr within the high pressure common rail tube chamber. Besides, some operation condition parameters, such as high pressure pump plunger stroke h(θ), high pressure fuel pump plunger movement line speed θ, may be derived by calculation based on other measured parameters (for example, camshaft rotating angle, pump camshaft rotating speed) and the physical relationships therebetween. In addition, there are some parameters that cannot or can hardly be obtained through measurement based on the prior art, or the costs for their implementation are high. For such parameters, they may be estimated through the states of other relevant parameters or through empirical manners. One example of such parameters is the fuel pressure PP within the plunger pump chamber of a high pressure pump.
According to one preferred embodiment of the present invention, there is further included an observation value determining module 204 configured to determine an observation value of a parameter such as the fuel pressure within the plunger pump chamber. As shown in
Fuel Pressure State Observer Model
In order to determine an observe value of the fuel pressure PP within a plunger pump chamber, the observer will be designed by means of the aforementioned the equation 2 for the fuel pressure within the plunger pump chamber and the equation 4 for the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber.
First, suppose the state observation value of the fuel pressure PP within the plunger pump chamber is {circumflex over (P)}p, the measured value of the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber is Pr, and the state observation value of the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber is {circumflex over (P)}r.
Based on the equations 2 and 4, through designing an observer by adding adjustment terms to the fuel pressure equation within the plunger pump chamber and the fuel pressure equation within the high pressure common rail tube chamber and substituting the equation 3 and equation 5 into equations 2 and 4, the following two equations may be derived:
Wherein the adjustment factors Lp and Lr related to the adjustment items in expressions 19 and 20 may be selected as appropriate values that stabilize and converge both of the above two expressions 19 and 20. It may be determined based on the requirements of actual application.
Therefore, there is a solution to the equation simultaneously formed by the equations 19 and 20. Thus, it means the value of {circumflex over (P)}p or preferably both values of {circumflex over (P)}p and {circumflex over (P)}r, may be derived based on the operation condition parameters (including, for example, the plunger pump volume Vp (or the plunger pump stroke h), fuel flow Qu of the plunger pump chamber (or the metering unit equivalent cross-sectional area u of the flow metering unit electromagnetic value), plunger movement line speed θ) and the rail pressure Pr of the high pressure common rail.
Thus, in the preferred embodiment, the observation value determining module 204 may determine the observation value {circumflex over (P)}p of the fuel pressure within the high pressure pump plunger chamber based on the physical model and the operation condition parameters, so as to be used in determining the control quantity as depicted infra. Preferably, the observation value {circumflex over (P)}r of the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber may be further determined, so as to be used for determining the control quantity as depicted infra.
Actually, the control quantity may also be determined using the measured value of the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber. However, it is preferable to use the observation value {circumflex over (P)}r of the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber, because the observation value {circumflex over (P)}r actually corresponds to a filtered value of the measured value Pr, such that use of the observation value may enhance the accuracy of the control model.
For the sake of clarity,
Accordingly, operation condition parameters that may meet the control requirements include: high pressure pump plunger stroke h, high pressure fuel pump plunger movement line speed θ, fuel pressure Pr within the plunger pump chamber, and fuel pressure Pp within the high pressure common rail tube chamber Pp. The value of the equivalent cross-section area u of the flow metering unit electromagnetic valve as used in observing Pr and Pp may be the control quantity u derived from the previous computation.
Therefore, as above mentioned, the observation value determining module 204 may determine the observation values of the fuel pressure within the plunger pump chamber and the fuel pressure within the high pressure common tail tube chamber, based on the operation condition parameters measured or computed by the operation condition acquiring module 201 and based on for example the observer model as previously designed. Then, the control quantity determining module 202 may use these operation condition parameters (including the fuel pressure value observed through the observer), the control model determined based on the physical model and the rail pressure target value to determine the control quantity, i.e., the equivalent cross-section area of the flow metering unit. Further, the drive signal generating module 203 may generate a drive signal for driving the fuel level metering unit based on the magnitude of the control quantity.
According to embodiments of the present invention, particularly the preferred embodiments, the proposed control apparatus performs control based on the physical model of the high pressure common rail fuel injection system of a diesel engine. Because the physical model of the high pressure common rail fuel injection system of the diesel engine is applicable to a working process of the system in any operation condition, the physical model-based technical solution of the present invention may achieve an accurate injection pressure and a fast system response, which in turn may reduce the offset between the actual pressure of the rail pressure and its target value and minimize it in preferred embodiments. In addition, a control model designed based on the physical model of the high-pressure common rail fuel system can be quantized, which thus greatly reduces the calibration workload for the control model, and improves the efficiency and functionality of the high pressure common rail fuel injection system of the engine.
Besides, the present invention further provides a method for controlling a high pressure common rail system of a diesel engine. Next, detailed depiction will be made with reference to
As shown in
In preferred embodiments, as above mentioned, an observation value of fuel pressure within the high pressure pump plunger chamber may be determined at step 402 based on the operation condition parameters and an observer model designed based on the physical model, so as to be used in determining the control quantity as depicted infra. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the observer model may be designed by adding an adjustment term to an expression for the fuel pressure within the plunger pump chamber and to expression for the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube cavity in the physical model, respectively, and by selecting an adjustment factor to make both adjusted expressions stable and converged. More preferably, an observation value of fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber may be determined based on the operation condition parameters and the observer model, so as to be used for determining the control quantity.
Next, at step 403, a control quantity for controlling the high pressure common rail system may be determined based on the operation condition parameters, the target value of the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber, and a control model designed based on the physical model of the high pressure common rail system, wherein the control quantity is an equivalent cross-section area of the flow metering unit electromagnetic valve.
In an embodiment of the present disclosure, the physical model of the high pressure common rail system can be characterized by: an expression for the fuel outflow of the flow metering unit; an expression for the fuel pressure within the plunger pump chamber; an expression for fuel outflow of the plunger pump chamber; an expression for the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube chamber; and an expression for the fuel injection of a fuel injector.
Besides, the control model designed based on the physical model may include a feedforward controller, and the control quantity includes a feedforward control component. In an embodiment of the present invention, the feedforward control component uFF may be expressed as:
wherein b1, b2 and b3 are control coefficients, and as aforementioned, they may be determined based on the acquired operation condition parameters and constant parameters associated with the physical model; θ denotes a high pressure fuel pump plunger movement line speed
Additionally or alternatively, the control model may include a feedback controller, for example, a PID feedback control term, and the control quantity includes a feedback control component. In an embodiment of the present invention, the feedback control component uFB may be expressed as:
wherein e denotes an error between the fuel pressure within the high pressure common rail tube cavity and its target value; b3 is a control coefficient, which may be determined based on the acquired operation condition parameters and constant parameters associated with the physical model; kp, kl and kd are control coefficients respectively for proportional control, integral control, and differential control, and the kp, kl and kd gain values may be selected to stabilize the high pressure common rail system.
Afterwards, at step 404, a drive signal for driving the flow metering unit may be determined based on the determined control quantity.
Operations of various steps in this method substantially correspond to the operations of various components of the control device as depicted above. Therefore, for specific operations of respective steps in the method or details of relevant contents therein, they may refer to the above depiction on the control apparatus with reference to
Besides, it should be noted that the embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in hardware, software or the combination thereof. The hardware part can be implemented by a special logic; the software part can be stored in a memory and executed by a proper instruction execution system such as a microprocessor or a design-specific hardware. The normally skilled in the art may understand that the above method and system may be implemented with a computer-executable instruction and/or in a processor controlled code, for example, such code is provided on a bearer medium such as a magnetic disk, CD, or DVD-ROM, or a programmable memory such as a read-only memory (firmware) or a data bearer such as an optical or electronic signal bearer. The apparatuses and their components in the present invention may be implemented by hardware circuitry of a programmable hardware device such as a very large scale integrated circuit or gate array, a semiconductor such as logical chip or transistor, or a field-programmable gate array, or a programmable logical device, or implemented by software executed by various kinds of processors, or implemented by combination of the above hardware circuitry and software.
It should be noted that although a plurality of devices or sub-device of the control apparatus have been mentioned in the above detailed depiction, such partitioning is merely non-compulsory. In actuality, according to the embodiments of the present invention, the features and functions of the above described two or more means may be embodied in one means. In turn, the features and functions of the above described one means may be further embodied in more modules.
Besides, although operations of the present methods are described in a particular order in the drawings, it does not require or imply that these operations must be performed according to this particular sequence, or a desired outcome can only be achieved by performing all shown operations. Instead, the execution order for the steps as depicted in the flowcharts may be varied. Additionally or alternatively, some steps may be omitted, a plurality of steps may be merged into one step, or a step may be divided into a plurality of steps for execution.
Although the present invention has been depicted with reference to the currently considered embodiments, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited the disclosed embodiments. On the contrary, the present invention intends to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included in the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The scope of the appended claims accords with the broadest explanations and covers all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2011/073003 | 4/19/2011 | WO | 00 | 10/18/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/142744 | 10/26/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4884545 | Mathis | Dec 1989 | A |
5094216 | Miyaki | Mar 1992 | A |
5133645 | Crowley | Jul 1992 | A |
5404855 | Yen | Apr 1995 | A |
5486097 | Schaffner | Jan 1996 | A |
5678521 | Thompson | Oct 1997 | A |
5983863 | Cavanagh | Nov 1999 | A |
6053147 | Hemmerlein | Apr 2000 | A |
6085727 | Nakano | Jul 2000 | A |
6293251 | Hemmerlein | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6349702 | Nishiyama | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6484696 | Barnes | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6701898 | Tokuo | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7073486 | Nomura | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7293548 | Oono | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7690361 | Vogt | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706957 | Yamada | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7757669 | Okamoto | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7779816 | Dolker | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7848868 | Nakagawa | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20020139350 | Barnes | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040055576 | McCarthy, Jr. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040194762 | Okamoto | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040267433 | Asano | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050098158 | Asano | May 2005 | A1 |
20080216797 | Oono | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090093942 | Okamoto | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090308351 | Okamoto | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100269790 | Ohta | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110253103 | Talwar | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130060448 | Nakada | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140034022 | Hu | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140041634 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |