Patent Grant
7059319
This invention relates generally to the field of aerosols and more particularly to devices and methods for creating aerosols of pharmaceutical formulations for delivery to a human patient, preferably by inhalation.
Aerosolizing formulations for inhalation has been considered as a convenient alternative to injection for decades. This alternative to injections is particularly interesting for drugs which cannot be delivered orally, e.g. insulin. Although most compounds will effectively move from the lungs into the circulatory system there is considerable unpredictability in how much aerosolized formulation reaches the areas of the lungs where the material can move into the circulatory system. This results in inefficiency and unpredictability of dosing. A number of devices have been proposed for improving the efficiency of aerosol delivery, monitoring patients and teaching patients to correctly use delivery devices.
There are several different types of devices which use generally different mechanisms and methodologies to produce aerosols for inhalation. The most commonly used device is a metered dose inhaler (MDI) which comprises a drug formulation container with the formulation including a low boiling point propellant. The formulation is held in the container under pressure and a metered dose of formulation is released as an aerosol when the valve on the container is opened. The low boiling point propellant quickly evaporates or “flashes” when the formulation is exposed to atmospheric pressure outside the container. The particles of formulation containing the drug without the propellant are inhaled into the patient's lungs and thereafter migrate into the patient's circulatory system. There are a number of different types of MDI devices. Devices of this type are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,404,871 issued Apr. 11, 1995 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,838 issued Nov. 15, 1994.
Another type of device is the dry powder inhaler (DPI) device. As indicated by the name such devices use formulations of dry powder which powder is blown into an aerosolized cloud via a burst of gas. Typical DPI devices are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,775,320 issued Jul. 7, 1998 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,740,794 issued Apr. 21, 1998.
Yet another type of aerosol delivery device forces a formulation through a porous membrane. Formulation moving through the pores breaks up to form small particles which are inhaled by the patient. Devices of this type are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,554,646 issued Aug. 13, 1996 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,522,385 issued Jun. 4, 1996.
Each of these devices has some advantages and disadvantages. The object of each is substantially the same—to repeatedly produce a fine mist aerosol wherein the particles are substantially uniform in size and within a size range of about 1 micron to about 5 microns. A patient can be accurately dosed if the device can repeatedly start with a given amount of formula and produce a known amount of aerosol with particles having sizes within a known range. The present invention endeavors to provide a device and method for obtaining accurate repeatable dosing of a patient with an aerosol.
Aerosolized particles within a desired size range (e.g., 1 micron to about 5 microns) are produced from a liquid formulation comprised of a pharmaceutical active drug and a carrier. The particles produced all have substantially the same particle diameter ±3% to ±30%, e.g. all particles in the aerosol have a diameter of 2 microns ±3% to ±10%. The formulation is provided in any desired manner (e.g., forced through a channel of a feeding needle and expelled out of an exit opening of the needle). Simultaneously, gas contained in a pressure chamber (which surrounds at least the area where the formulation is provided, e.g., surrounds the exit opening of the needle) is forced out of an opening positioned in front of the formulation, e.g., directly in front of the flow path of the formulation being expelled from the feeding needle. Various parameters are adjusted to obtain a super critical flow of liquid characterized by a stable liquid-gas interface and a stable capillary jet of the liquid which forms particles on exiting the opening of the pressurized chamber which particles will all (90% or more) have substantially the same diameter, i.e., a monodisperse aerosol.
An object of the invention is to provide a device for aerosolized delivery of a pharmaceutically active drug formulation or a diagnostic formulation.
Another object is to provide a method of creating an aerosol of consistent particle size (±3 to 30% or preferably ±3 to 10% difference in diameter) which aerosol is inhalable by a patient for aerosolized delivery of drugs or diagnostics.
A feature of the invention is that the diameter of the opening from which liquid is expelled, the diameter of the opening from which gas is expelled and the distance between these two openings is adjustable and is adjusted to obtain a stable liquid-gas interface which results in a stable capillary microjet being formed by the liquid expelled which microjet is focused on an exit opening by the flow of surrounding gas.
Another feature of the invention is that the viscosities and velocities of the fluids can be chosen with consideration to other adjusted parameters to obtain a supercritical flow of liquid.
Another feature of the invention is that the liquid can be a single liquid, two or more (miscible or immiscible) liquids mixed, a solution or a suspension.
An advantage of the invention is that the gas flowing with the particles prevents the particles from agglomerating thereby maintaining a monodisperse aerosol.
An advantage of the invention is that it consistently produces aerosols having particles with a desired particle diameter e.g. 1 to 5 microns.
An advantage of the invention is that the device of the invention is energy efficient in terms of the energy used to create small particles for inhalation.
Another advantage is that the structure of the device and its use are simple.
Another advantage is that clogging of the exit opening of the pressure chamber is substantially eliminated because liquid is kept out of contact with the surface of the exit opening by a surrounding focused funnel of gas which flows out of the pressure chamber exit opening.
Yet another advantage is that particles produced are substantially smaller in size than would be expected based on the diameter of the exit opening of the pressure chamber due to focusing the flow of the liquid with the flow of surrounding gas.
An aspect of the invention is a hand-held, self-contained portable drug delivery device which consistently produces small aerosolized particles which are relatively uniform in size.
Another aspect of the invention is a device and method which produces multiple streams of aerosol thereby quickly aerosolizing a large dose of formulation for inhalation by a patient.
These and other aspects, objects, features and advantages will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading this disclosure in combination with the figures provided.
Before the present aerosol device and method are described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular components and steps described, as such may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting, since the scope of the
It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “and,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a particle” includes a plurality of particles and reference to “a fluid” includes reference to a mixture of fluids, and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth present invention will be limited only by the appended claims.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, the preferred methods and materials are now described. All publications mentioned herein are incorporated herein by reference to disclose and describe the methods and/or materials in connection with which the publications are cited.
The publications discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention. Further, the dates of publication provided may be different from the actual publication dates which may need to be independently confirmed.
The term “formulation” is used to describe any single liquid, mixture, solution, suspension or the like which is a flowable liquid at room temperature and comprises either a pharmaceutically active compound, a diagnostic compound or a compound which becomes an active compound after entering a patient, e.g. prodrugs or DNA encoding proteins. The formulation is preferably further comprised of a carrier and more preferably is a liquid that has physical properties (e.g., viscosity) such that when the formulation is moved through a device of the invention the formulation is aerosolized into particles (0.1 to 10 microns in diameter) which are inhaled into the lungs of a patient and preferably reach the circulatory system. The carrier may be any pharmaceutically acceptable material and is preferably a flowable liquid which is compatible with the active agent. Formulations are preferably solutions, e.g., aqueous solutions, ethanolic solutions, aqueous/ethanolic solutions, saline solutions, colloidal suspensions and microcrystalline suspensions. Formulations can be solutions or suspensions of drugs (including systemically active drugs, e.g. insulin, insulin analogs including monomeric insulin such as insulin lispro) in the above mentioned liquids.
The term “carrier” shall mean a substantially inactive (biologically) component of a formulation such as a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient material which an active ingredient such as a drug, a diagnostic agent, prodrug or a gene vector is mixed with, suspended or dissolved in. The carrier is preferably a flowable liquid. Useful carriers do not adversely interact with the drug, diagnostic or gene vector and have properties which allow for the formation of aerosolized particles preferably particles having a diameter in the range of 0.1 to 10.0 microns (more preferably 1 to 5 microns) when a formulation comprising the carrier and active ingredient is aerosolized out of a device of the invention. Carriers include water, ethanol, saline solutions and mixtures thereof with pure water being preferred. Other carriers can be used provided that they can be formulated to create a suitable aerosol and do not adversely effect the active component or human lung tissue.
The term “active compound” means a compound which is either a pharmaceutically active drug, becomes or produces a therapeutic compound in the body or is a detectably labeled compound. In turn, a “pharmaceutically active drug” or therapeutic compound shall be interpreted to mean any pharmaceutically effective compound used in the treatment of disease. A “detectably labeled compound” includes compounds which are radioactively labeled see U.S. Pat. No. 5,829,436 issued Nov. 3, 1998 Re: detectable labels.
Pharmaceutical formulations for use in the invention may be comprised of any therapeutic agent that can be atomized for patient delivery, e.g. for pulmonary delivery using an inhalation delivery system. Examples of such pharmaceutical compositions may be found in the Physicians Desk Reference (1998), and Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy 19th Edition (1995), both of which are incorporated herein by reference. These formulations may be in any form capable of atomization, such as a solution, a suspension, an emulsion, a slurry, etc., provided the dynamics of the form render it capable of forming a capillary microjet upon exposure to a second fluid.
The terms “electronic particle sensing device” and “electronic detection system” refer to a device or other means for measuring and counting particles present in an aerosol mist.
The term “reporting means” is used herein to indicate a means by which information obtained from a monitoring device such as an electronic particle sensing device or a device which monitors and records information relating to the patient's respiratory movement, may be provided to the user.
The term “aerosol bolus” is used herein to describe a volume of air greater than 50 ml and less than 4 liters which has suspended within it particles of a formulation wherein the particles have a diameter in the range of 0.1 to 10 microns, preferably 1 to 5 microns, and preferably the total volume of formulation is from 5 μl to 10,000 μl. About 10 μl of particles having a diameter of about 1 to 3 microns are present in a volume of about 50 ml to 2 liters, preferably 100 ml to 1,000 ml.
The term “aerosol” means any part of an aerosol bolus as described above.
The terms “air”, “particle free air”, “aerosol free air,” and the like, are used interchangeably herein to describe a volume of air which is substantially free of other material and, in particular, free of particles intentionally added such as particles of formulation which create the aerosol. The term means that the air does not include particles of formulation which have been intentionally added but is not intended to imply that the normal surrounding air has been filtered or treated to remove all particles although filtering can take place. Air is the preferred gas to use with drug delivery it being noted that other non-toxic gases, e.g., CO2 can be used.
The term “measuring” describes an event whereby the (1) total lung capacity, (2) inspiratory flow rate or (3) inspiratory volume of the patient is measured and/or calculated. The information is preferably used in order to determine an optimal point in the inspiratory cycle at which to release an aerosol and/or a particle free volume of air. An actual measurement of both rate and volume may be made or the rate can be directly measured and the volume calculated based on the measured rate. The total lung capacity can be measured or calculated based on the patient's height, sex and age. It is also preferable to continue measuring inspiratory flow during and after aerosol delivery and to record inspiratory flow rate and volume before, during and after the release of formulation. Such reading makes it possible to determine if aerosolized formulation was properly delivered to the patient.
The term “monitoring” event shall comprise determining the character of an aerosol such as the size, number and speed of the particles in the aerosol, further, monitoring may comprise measuring lung functions such as inspiratory flow, inspiratory flow rate, and/or inspiratory volume so that a patient's lung function as defined herein, can be evaluated during before and/or after delivery thereby making it possible to evaluate the effect of formulation such as respiratory drug delivery on the patient's lung function.
The term “inspiratory flow rate” shall mean a value of air flow rate determined, calculated or measured based on the speed of the air passing a given point in a measuring device assuming atmospheric pressure, ±5% and a temperature in the range of about 10° C. to 40° C.
The term “inspiratory flow” shall be interpreted to mean a value of air flow calculated based on the speed of the air passing a given point along with the volume of the air that has passed that point with the volume calculation being based on integration of the flow rate data and assuming atmospheric pressure, ±5% and temperature in the range of about 10° C. to about 40° C.
The term “inspiratory volume” shall mean a determined, measured or calculated volume of air passing a given point into the lungs of a patient assuming atmospheric pressure ±5% and a temperature in the range of 10° C. to 40° C.
The terms “lung function” and “pulmonary function” are used interchangeably and shall be interpreted to mean physically measurable operations of a lung including but not limited to (1) inspiratory and (2) expiratory flow rates as well as (3) lung volume, i.e., total lung capacity. Methods of quantitatively determining pulmonary function are used to measure lung function. Quantitative determination of pulmonary function may be important when delivering any formulation and in particular respiratory drugs in order to direct the aerosol to a specific area of the lung and to determine effectiveness. Methods of measuring pulmonary function most commonly employed in clinical practice involve timed measurement of inspiratory and expiratory maneuvers to measure specific parameters. For example, forced vital capacity (FVC) measures the total volume in liters exhaled by a patient forcefully from a deep initial inspiration. This parameter, when evaluated in conjunction with the forced expired volume in one second (FEV1), allows bronchoconstriction to be quantitatively evaluated. A problem with forced vital capacity determination is that the forced vital capacity maneuver (i.e. forced exhalation from maximum inspiration to maximum expiration) is largely technique dependent. In other words, a given patient may produce different FVC values during a sequence of consecutive FVC maneuvers. The FEF 25–75 or forced expiratory flow determined over the mid-portion of a forced exhalation maneuver tends to be less technique dependent than the FVC. Similarly, the FEV1 tends to be less technique dependent than FVC. In addition to measuring volumes of exhaled air as indices of pulmonary function, the flow in liters per minute measured over differing portions of the expiratory cycle can be useful in determining the status of a patient's pulmonary function. In particular, the peak expiratory flow, taken as the highest air flow rate in liters per minute during a forced maximal exhalation, is well correlated with overall pulmonary function in a patient with asthma and other respiratory diseases. The present invention carries out treatment by administering formulation in a delivery event and monitoring lung function in a monitoring event. A series of such events may be carried out and repeated over time to determine if lung (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,404,871) function is improved.
Each of the parameters discussed above is measured during quantitative spirometry. A patient's individual performance can be compared against his personal best data, individual indices can be compared with each other for an individual patient (e.g. FEV1, divided by FVC, producing a dimensionless index useful in assessing the severity of acute asthma symptoms), or each of these indices can be compared against an expected value. Expected values for indices derived from quantitative spirometry are calculated as a function of the patient's sex, height, weight and age. For instance, standards exist for the calculation of expected indices and these are frequently reported along with the actual parameters derived for an individual patient during a monitoring event such as a quantitative spirometry test.
The terms “particles”, “aerosolized particles” and “aerosolized particles of formulation” are used interchangeably herein and shall mean particles of formulation comprised of any pharmaceutically active ingredient, a compound which becomes such in the body (e.g. a prodrug or DNA encoding a protein) or a diagnostic compound. Any of these is preferably with a carrier, (e.g., a pharmaceutically active respiratory drug and carrier). Particles of a liquid formulation are formed upon forcing the formulation from anywhere it is provided (e.g., the feeding needle) and then out of the pressure chamber exit orifice. The particles have a size which is sufficiently small such that when the particles are formed they remain suspended in the air for a sufficient amount of time such that the patient can inhale the particles into the patient's lungs. The particles have a size in the range of 0.1 micron to about 10 microns, preferably 1 to 5 microns. Particle diameter is an aerodynamic diameter.
In referring to particle diameter, the diameter measurement given is the “aerodynamic diameter” measurement which is the diameter of a sphere of unit density that has the same terminal sedimentation velocity in air under normal atmospheric conditions as the particle in question. This is pointed out in that it is difficult to accurately measure the diameter of small particles using current technology and the shape may be continually changing. Thus, the diameter of one particle of material of a given density will be said to have the same diameter as another particle of the same or a different material if the two particles have the same terminal sedimentation velocity in air under the same conditions.
The present disclosure focuses on the use of an aerosol creation device to produce aerosolized liquid formulations for delivery of drugs to patients—preferably by inhalation into the lungs.
The basic technology of the invention comprises (1) a means for supplying a first fluid; and (2) a pressure chamber supplied with a second fluid. The first fluid is generally a liquid and preferably aqueous. The second fluid is generally a gas and preferably air. However, the first fluid may be a gas and second fluid a liquid or both fluids may be liquid provided the first and second fluid are sufficiently different from each other (immiscible) so as to allow for the formation of a stable microjet of the first fluid moving from the supply means to an exit port of the pressure chamber. Notwithstanding these different combinations of gas-liquid, liquid-gas, and liquid-liquid the invention is generally described with a liquid formulation being expelled from the supply means and forming a stable microjet due to interaction with surrounding air flow focusing the microjet to flow out of an exit of the pressure chamber.
Formation of the microjet and its acceleration and ultimate particle formation are based on the abrupt pressure drop associated with the steep acceleration experienced by the first fluid (e.g., a liquid) on passing through an exit orifice of the pressure chamber which holds the second fluid. On leaving the chamber the flow undergoes a large pressure difference between the first fluid (e.g., a liquid) and the second fluid (e.g., a gas), which in turn produces a highly curved zone on the first fluid (e.g., liquid) surface near the exit port of the pressure chamber and in the formation of a cuspidal point from which a steady microjet flows provided the amount of the first fluid (e.g., the liquid) withdrawn through the exit port of the pressure chamber is replenished. Thus, in the same way that a glass lens or a lens of the eye focuses light to a given point, the flow of the gas surrounds and focuses the liquid into a stable microjet. The focusing effect of the surrounding flow of gas creates a stream of liquid which is substantially smaller in diameter than the diameter of the exit orifice of the pressure chamber. This allows liquid to flow out of the pressure chamber orifice without touching the orifice, providing advantages including (1) clogging of the exit orifice is virtually eliminated, (2) contamination of flow due to contact with substances (e.g. bacteria) on the orifice opening is virtually eliminated, and (3) the diameter of the stream and the resulting particles are smaller than the diameter of the exit orifice of the chamber. This is particularly desirable because it is difficult to precisely engineer holes which are very small in diameter. Further, in the absence of the focusing effect (and formation a stable microjet) flow of liquid out of an opening will result in particles which have about twice the diameter of the exit opening. An additional advantage is that the particles are not prone to agglomeration following exit from the chamber.
Specific embodiments of aerosol creation devices are now described.
A first embodiment of the invention where the supply means is a cylindrical feeding needle supplying liquid into a pressurized chamber of gas is described below with reference to
The components of the embodiment of
An aerosolized drug delivery device of the invention may be any size but is preferably designed to be a hand-held, portable, self-contained device weighing less than 1 kilogram. Although the device can be configured in a variety of designs, the different designs will all include the essential components shown in
In
Such a monodisperse aerosol is created using the components and configuration as described above. However, other components and configurations will occur to those skilled in the art. The object of each design will be to supply formulation so that it creates a stable capillary microjet which is accelerated and stabilized by tangential viscous stress exerted by the gas on the liquid surface. The stable microjet created by the gas leaves the area of the pressurized gas (e.g., leaves the pressure chamber and exits the pressure chamber orifice) and splits into particles which have the desired size and uniformity.
The aerosol created is a monodisperse aerosol meaning that the size of the particles produced are relatively uniform in size. The relative standard deviation in particle size is in the range of from about 10% to about 30%, preferably 3% to 10% and most preferably 3% or less. The size of aerosolized particles useful for inhalation is a diameter in the range of from about 0.1 micron to about 10 microns, more preferably about 1 micron to about 3 microns.
For purposes of simplicity the remainder of the detailed description of the operation of the device of
When the stationary, steady interface is created, the capillary jet that emerges from the end of the drop at the outlet of the feeding point is concentrically withdrawn into the nozzle. After the jet emerges from the drop, the liquid is accelerated by tangential sweeping forces exerted by the gas stream flowing on its surface, which gradually decreases the jet cross-section. Stated differently the gas flow acts as a lens and focuses and stabilizes the microjet as it moves toward and into the exit orifice of the pressure chamber.
The forces exerted by the second fluid (e.g., a gas) flow on the first fluid (e.g., a liquid) surface should be steady enough to prevent irregular surface oscillations. Therefore, any turbulence in the gas motion should be avoided; even if the gas velocity is high, the characteristic size of the orifice should ensure that the gas motion is laminar (similar to the boundary layers formed on the jet and on the inner surface of the nozzle or hole).
The gas flow, which affects the liquid withdrawal and its subsequent acceleration after the jet is formed, should be very rapid but also uniform in order to avoid perturbing the fragile capillary interface (the surface of the drop that emerges from the jet).
Liquid flows out of the end of a capillary tube and forms a small liquid drop at the end. The tube has an internal radius R0. The drop has a radius in a range of from R0 to R0 plus the structural thickness of the tube as the drop exits the tube, and thereafter the drop narrows in circumference to a much smaller circumference as is shown in the expanded view of the tube (i.e. feeding needle) 5 as shown in
As illustrated in
In actual use, it can be understood that the opening shape which provokes maximum gas acceleration (and consequently the most stable cusp and microjet with a given set of parameters) is a conically shaped opening in the pressure chamber. The conical opening is positioned with its narrower end toward the source of liquid flow.
The distance between the end 61 of the tube 60 and the beginning of the exit opening 68 is H. At this point it is noted that Ro, D, H and L are all preferably on the order of hundreds of microns. For example, Ro=400 μm, D=150 μm, H=1 mm, L=300 μm. However, each could be 1/100 to 100× these sizes.
The end of the liquid stream develops a cusp-like shape at a critical distance from the exit opening 68 in the pressure chamber 69 when the applied pressure drop ΔPg across the exit opening 68 overcomes the liquid-gas surface tension stresses γ/R* appearing at the point of maximum curvature—e.g. 1/R* from the exit opening.
A steady state is then established if the liquid flow rate Q ejected from the drop cusp is steadily supplied from the capillary tube. This is the stable capillary cusp which is an essential characteristic of the invention needed to form the stable microjet. More particularly, a steady, thin liquid jet with a typical diameter dj is smoothly emitted from the stable cusp-like drop shape and this thin liquid jet extends over a distance in the range of microns to millimeters. The length of the stable microjet will vary from very short (e.g. 1 micron) to very long (e.g. 50 mm) with the length depending on the (1) flow-rate of the liquid and (2) the Reynolds number of the gas stream flowing out of the exit opening of the pressure chamber. The liquid jet is the stable capillary microjet obtained when supercritical flow is reached. This jet demonstrates a robust behavior provided that the pressure drop ΔPg applied to the gas is sufficiently large compared to the maximum surface tension stress (on the order of γ/dj) that act at the liquid-gas interface. The jet has a slightly parabolic axial velocity profile which is, in large part, responsible for the stability of the microjet. The stable microjet is formed without the need for other forces, i.e. without adding force such as electrical forces on a charged fluid. However, for some applications it is preferable to add charge to particles, e.g. to cause the particles to adhere to a given surface. The shaping of liquid exiting the capillary tube by the gas flow forming a focusing funnel creates a cusp-like meniscus resulting in the stable microjet. This is a fundamental characteristic of the invention.
The fluid stream flowing from the tube has substantially more density and develops substantially more inertia as compared to the gas, which has lower viscosity than the liquid. These characteristics contribute to the formation of the stable capillary jet. The stable capillary microjet is maintained stably for a significant distance in the direction of flow away from the exit from the tube. The liquid is, at this point, undergoing “supercritical flow.” The microjet eventually destabilizes due to the effect of surface tension forces. Destabilization results from small natural perturbations moving downstream, with the fastest growing perturbations being those which govern the break up of the microjet, eventually creating a uniform sized monodisperse aerosol 70 as shown in
The microjet, even as it initially destabilizes, passes out of the exit orifice of the pressure chamber without touching the peripheral surface of the exit opening. This provides an important advantage of the invention which is that the exit opening 68 (which could be referred to as a nozzle) will not clog from residue and/or deposits of the liquid. Clogging is a major problem with very small nozzles and is generally dealt with by cleaning or replacing the nozzle. When fluid contacts the surfaces of a nozzle opening some fluid will remain in contact with the nozzle when the flow of fluid is shut off. The liquid remaining on the nozzle surface evaporates leaving a residue. After many uses over time the residue builds up and clogging takes place. The present invention substantially reduces or eliminates this clogging problem.
Cylindrical coordinates (r,z) are chosen for making a mathematical analysis of a stable microjet, i.e. liquid undergoing “supercritical flow.” The cusp-like meniscus formed by the liquid coming out of the tube is pulled toward the exit of the pressure chamber by a pressure gradient created by the flow of gas.
The cusp-like meniscus formed at the tube's mouth is pulled towards the hole by the pressure gradient created by the gas stream. From the cusp of this meniscus, a steady liquid thread with the shape of radius r=ξ is withdrawn through the hole by the action of both the suction effect due to ΔPg, and the tangential viscous stresses τs exerted by the gas on the jet's surface in the axial direction. The averaged momentum equation for this configuration may be written:
where Q is the liquid flow rate upon exiting the feeding tube, P1 is the liquid pressure, and ρ1 is the liquid density, assuming that the viscous extensional term is negligible compared to the kinetic energy term, as will be subsequently justified. In addition, liquid evaporation effects are neglected. The liquid pressure P1 is given by the capillary equation.
P1=Pg+β/ξ (2)
where γ is the liquid-gas surface tension. As shown in the Examples, the pressure drop ΔPg is sufficiently large as compared to the surface tension stress γ/ξ to justify neglecting the latter in the analysis. This scenario holds for the whole range of flow rates in which the microjet is absolutely stable. In fact, it will be shown that, for a given pressure drop ΔPg, the minimum liquid flow rate that can be sprayed in steady jet conditions is achieved when the surface tension stress γ/ξ is of the order of the kinetic energy of the liquid ρ1Q2/(2π2ξ4), since the surface tension acts like a “resistance” to the motion (it appears as a negative term in the right-hand side term of Eq. (1)). Thus,
For sufficiently large flow rates Q compared to Qmin, the simplified averaged momentum equation in the axial direction can be expressed as
where one can identify the two driving forces for the liquid flow on the right-hand side. This equation can be integrated provided the following simplification is made if one uses a thin plate with thickness L of the order or smaller than the hole's diameter D (which minimizes downstream perturbations in the gas flow), the pressure gradient up to the hole exit is on the average much larger than the viscous shear term 2τs/ξ owning to the surface stress. On the other hand, the axial viscous term is of the order O[μ2Q/D2dj2], since the hole diameter D is actually the characteristic distance associated with the gas flow at the hole's entrance in both the radial and axial directions. This term is very small compared to the pressure gradient in real situations, provided that ΔPg>>μ2/D2ρ1 (which holds, e.g., for liquids with viscosities as large as 100 cpoises, using hole diameters and pressure drops as small as D˜10 μm and ΔPg≧100 mbar). The neglect of all viscous terms in Eq. (4) is then justified. Notice that in this limit on the liquid flow is quasi-isentropic in the average (the liquid almost follows Bernoulli equation) as opposed to most micrometric extensional flows. Thus, integrating (4) from the stagnation regions of both fluids up to the exit, one obtains a simple and universal expression for the jet diameter at the hole exit:
which for a given pressure drop ΔPg is independent of geometrical parameters (hole and tube diameters, tube-hole distance, etc.), liquid and gas viscosities, and liquid-gas surface tension. This diameter remains almost constant up to the breakup point since the gas pressure after the exit remains constant.
Above the stable microjet undergoing “supercritical flow” is described and it can be seen how this aspect of the invention can be made use of in a variety of industrial applications—particularly where the flow of liquid through small holes creates a clogging problem. An equally important aspect of the invention is obtained after the microjet leaves the pressure chamber.
When the microjet exits the pressure chamber the liquid pressure P1 becomes (like the gas pressure Pg) almost constant in the axial direction, and the jet diameter remains almost constant up to the point where it breaks up by capillary instability. Defining a Weber number We=(ρgνg2dj)/γ=2ΔPgdj/γ (where νg is the gas velocity measured at the orifice), below a certain experimental value Wec˜40 the breakup mode is axisymmetric and the resulting droplet stream is characterized by its monodispersity provided that the fluctuations of the gas flow do not contribute to droplet coalescence (these fluctuations occur when the gas stream reaches a fully developed turbulent profile around the liquid jet breakup region). Above this Wec value, sinuous nonaxisymmetric disturbances, coupled to the axisymmetric ones, become apparent. For larger We numbers, the nonlinear growth rate of the sinuous disturbances seems to overcome that of the axisymmetric disturbances. The resulting spray shows significant polydispersity in this case. Thus, it can be seen that by controlling parameters to keep the resulting Weber number to 40 or less, allows the particles formed to be all substantially the same size. The size variation is about ±3% to ±30% and move preferably ±3% to ±10%. These particles can have a desired size e.g. 0.1 microns to 50 microns.
The shed vorticity influences the breakup of the jet and thus the formation of the particles. Upstream from the hole exit, in the accelerating region, the gas stream is laminar. Typical values of the Reynolds number range from 500 to 6000 if a velocity of the order of the speed of sound is taken as characteristic of the velocity of the gas. Downstream from the hole exit, the cylindrical mixing layer between the gas stream and the stagnant gas becomes unstable by the classical Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. The growth rate of the thickness of this layer depends on the Reynolds number of the flow and ring vortices are formed at a frequency of the order of νg/D, where D is the hole diameter. Typical values of νg and D as those found in our experimental technique lead to frequencies or the order of MHz which are comparable to the frequency of drop production (of order of tb−1).
Given the liquid flow rate and the hole diameter, a resonance frequency which depends on the gas velocity (or pressure difference driving the gas stream) can be adjusted (tuned) in such a way that vortices act as a forcing system to excite perturbations of a determined wavelength on the jet surface. Experimental results obtained clearly illustrates the different degree of coupling between the two gas-liquid coaxial jets. In one set of experimental results the particle sizes are shown to have a particle size of about 5.7 microns with a standard deviation of 12%. This results when the velocity of the gas has been properly tuned to minimize the dispersion in the size of droplets resulting from the jet breakup. In this case, the flow rate of the liquid jet and its diameter are 0.08 μl s−1 and 3 μm, respectively. Data have been collected using a MASTERSIZER from MALVERN Instruments. As the degree of coupling decreases, perturbations at the jet surface of different wavelengths become excited and, as it can be observed from the size distributions, the dispersion of the spray increases.
It is highly desirable in a number of different industrial applications to have particles which are uniform in size or to create aerosols of liquid particles which are uniform in size. For example, particles of a liquid formation containing a pharmaceutically active drug could be created and designed to have a diameter of about 2 microns ±3%. These particles could be inhaled into the lungs of a patient for intrapulmonary drug delivery. Moreover, particle size can be adjusted to target a particular area of the respiratory tract.
The gas flow should be laminar in order to avoid a turbulent regime—turbulent fluctuations in the gas flow which have a high frequency and would perturb the liquid-gas interface. The Reynolds numbers reached at the orifice are
where νg is the kinematic viscosity of the gas. Even though this number is quite high, there are large pressure gradients downstream (a highly convergent geometry), so that a turbulent regime is very unlikely to develop.
The essential difference from existing pneumatic atomizers (which possess large Weber numbers) and the present invention is that the aim of the present invention is not to rupture the liquid-gas interface but the opposite, i.e. to increase the stability of the interface until a capillary jet is obtained. The jet, which will be very thin provided the pressure drop resulting from withdrawal is high enough, splits into drops the sizes of which are much more uniform than those resulting from disorderly breakage of the liquid-gas interface in existing pneumatic atomizers.
The proposed atomization system obviously requires delivery of the liquid to be atomized and the gas to be used in the resulting spray. Both should be fed at a rate ensuring that the system lies within the stable parameter window. Multiplexing is effective when the flow-rates needed exceed those on an individual cell. More specifically, a plurality of feeding sources or feeding needles may be used to increase the rate at which aerosols are created. The flow-rates used should also ensure the mass ratio between the flows is compatible with the specifications of each application.
The gas and liquid can be dispensed by any type of continuous delivery system (e.g. a compressor or a pressurized tank the former and a volumetric pump or a pressurized bottle the latter). If multiplexing is needed, the liquid flow-rate should be as uniform as possible among cells; this may entail propulsion through several capillary needles, porous media or any other medium capable of distributing a uniform flow among different feeding points.
Each individual atomization device should consist of a feeding point (a capillary needle, a point with an open microchannel, a microprotuberance on a continuous edge, etc.) 0.002–2 mm (but, preferentially 0.01–0.4 mm) in diameter, where the drop emerging from the microjet can be anchored, and a small orifice 0.002–2 mm (preferentially 0.01–0.25 mm) in diameter facing the drop and separated 0.01–2 mm (preferentially 0.2–0.5 mm) from the feeding point. The orifice communicates the withdrawal gas around the drop, at an increased pressure, with the zone where the atomizate is produced, at a decreased pressure. The atomizer can be made from a variety of materials (metal, polymers, ceramics, glass).
Adjusting parameters to obtain a stable capillary microjet and control its breakup into monodisperse particle is governed by the Weber number and the liquid-to-gas velocity ratio or α which equal Vl/Vg. The Weber number or “We” is defined by the following equation:
wherein ρg is the density of the gas, d is the diameter of the stable microjet, γ is the liquid-gas surface tension, and Vg2 is the velocity of the gas squared.
When carrying out the invention the parameters should be adjusted so that the Weber number is greater than 1 in order to produce a stable capillary microjet. However, to obtain a particle dispersion which is monodisperse (i.e. each particle has the same size ±3 to ±30%) the parameters should be adjusted so that the Weber number is less than 40. The monodisperse aerosol is obtained with a Weber number in a range of about 1 to about 40 when the breaking time is sufficiently small to avoid non-symmetric perturbations (1≦We≦40).
A measure of the relative importance of viscosity on the jet breakup can be estimated from the Ohnesorge number defined as the ratio between two characteristic times: the viscous time tv and the breaking time tb. The breaking time tb is given by [see Rayleigh (1878)]
Perturbations on the jet surface are propagated inside by viscous diffusion in times tv of the order of
tv˜ρ1d2/μ1, (3)
where μ1 is the viscosity of the liquid. Then, the Ohnesorge number, Oh, results
If this ratio is much smaller than unity viscosity plays no essential role in the phenomenon under consideration. Since the maximum value of the Ohnesorge number in actual experiments conducted is as low as 3.7×10−2, viscosity plays no essential role during the process of jet breakup.
A variety of configurations of components and types of fluids will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading this disclosure. These configurations and fluids are encompassed by the present invention provided they can produce a stable capillary microjet of a first fluid from a source to an exit port of a pressure chamber containing a second fluid. The stable microjet is formed by the first fluid flowing from the feeding source to the exit port of the pressure chamber being accelerated and stabilized by tangential viscous stress exerted by the second fluid in the pressure chamber on the surface of the first fluid forming the microjet. The second fluid forms a focusing funnel when a variety of parameters are correctly tuned or adjusted. For example, the speed, pressure, viscosity and miscibility of the first and second fluids are chosen to obtain the desired results of a stable microjet of the first fluid focused into the center of a funnel formed with the second fluid. These results are also obtained by adjusting or tuning physical parameters of the device, including the size of the opening from which the first fluid flows, the size of the opening from which both fluids exit, and the distance between these two openings.
The embodiment of
The components of the embodiment of
The embodiment of
The process is based on the microsuction which the liquid-gas or liquid-liquid interphase undergoes (if both are immiscible), when said interphase approaches a point beginning from which one of the fluids is suctioned off while the combined suction of the two fluids is produced. The interaction causes the fluid physically surrounded by the other to form a capillary microjet which finally breaks into spherical drops. If instead of two fluids (gas-liquid), three or more are used that flow in a concentric manner by injection using concentric tubes, a capillary jet composed of two or more layers of different fluids is formed which, when it breaks, gives rise to the formation of spheres composed of several approximately concentric spherical layers of different fluids. The size of the outer sphere (its thickness) and the size of the inner sphere (its volume) can be precisely adjusted. This can allow the manufacture of coated particles for a variety of end uses. For example the thickness of the coating can be varied in different manufacturing events to obtain coated particles which have gradually decreasing thicknesses to obtain a controlled release effect of the contents, e.g. a pharmaceutically active drug. The coating could merely prevent the particles from degrading, reacting, or sticking together.
The method is based on the breaking of a capillary microjet composed of a nucleus of one liquid or gas and surrounded by another or other liquids and gases which are in a concentric manner injected by a special injection head, in such a way that they form a stable capillary microjet and that they do not mix by diffusion during the time between when the microjet is formed and when it is broken. When the capillary microjet is broken into spherical drops under the proper operating conditions, which will be described in detail below, these drops exhibit a spherical nucleus, the size and eccentricity of which can be controlled.
In the case of spheres containing two materials, the injection head 25 consists of two concentric tubes with an external diameter on the order of one millimeter. Through the internal tube 31 is injected the material that will constitute the nucleus of the microsphere, while between the internal tube 31 and the external tube 32 the coating is injected. The fluid of the external tube 32 joins with the fluid of tube 31 as the fluids exit the feeding needle, and the fluids (normally liquids) thus injected are accelerated by a stream of gas that passes through a small orifice 24 facing the end of the injection tubes. When the drop in pressure across the orifice 24 is sufficient, the liquids form a completely stationary capillary microjet, if the quantities of liquids that are injected are stationary. This microjet does not touch the walls of the orifice, but passes through it wrapped in the stream of gas or funnel formed by gas from the tube 32. Because the funnel of gas focuses the liquid, the size of the exit orifice 26 does not dictate the size of the particles formed.
When the parameters are correctly adjusted, the movement of the liquid is uniform at the exit of the orifice 26 and the viscosity forces are sufficiently small so as not to alter either the flow or the properties of the liquids; for example, if there are biochemical molecular specimens having a certain complexity and fragility, the viscous forces that would appear in association with the flow through a micro-orifice might degrade these substances.
There are two limitations for the minimum sizes of the inside and outside jets that are dependent (a) on the surface tensions γ1 of the outside liquid 29 with the gas 30 and γ2 of the outside liquid 29 with the inside liquid 28, and (b) on the difference in pressures ΔP=P0−Pα through the orifice 26. In the first place, the jump in pressures ΔP must be sufficiently great so that the adverse effects of the surface tension are minimized. This, however, is attained for very modest pressure increases: for example, for a 10 micron jet of a liquid having a surface tension of 0.05 N/m (tap water), the necessary minimum jump in pressure is in the order of 0.05 (N/m)/0.00001 m=ΔP=50 mBar. But, in addition, the breakage of the microjet must be regular and axilsymmetric, so that the drops will have a uniform size, while the extra pressure ΔP cannot be greater than a certain value that is dependent on the surface tension of the outside liquid with the gas γ1 and on the outside diameter of the microjet. It has been experimentally shown that this difference in pressures cannot be greater than 20 times the surface tension γ1 divided by the outside radius of the microjet.
Therefore, given some inside and outside diameters of the microjet, there is a range of operating pressures between a minimum and a maximum; nonetheless, experimentally the best results are obtained for pressures in the order of two to three times the minimum.
The viscosity values of the liquids must be such that the liquid with the greater viscosity μmax verifies, for a diameter d of the jet predicted for this liquid and a difference through the orifice ΔP, the inequality:
With this, the pressure gradients can overcome the extensional forces of viscous resistance exerted by the liquid when it is suctioned toward the orifice.
Moreover, the liquids must have very similar densities in order to achieve the concentricity of the nucleus of the microsphere, since the relation of velocities between the liquids moves according to the square root of the densities v1/v2=(ρ2/ρ1)1/2 and both jets, the inside jet and the outside jet, must assume the most symmetrical configuration possible, which does not occur if the liquids have different velocities (
When two liquids and gas are used on the outside, the distance between the planes of the mouths of the concentric tubes can vary, without the characteristics of the jet being substantially altered, provided that the internal tube 31 is not introduced into the external one 32 more than one diameter of the external tube 32 and provided that the internal tube 31 does not project more than two diameters from the external tube 32. The best results are obtained when the internal tube 31 projects from the external one 32 a distance substantially the same as the diameter of the internal tube 31. This same criterion is valid if more than two tubes are used, with the tube that is surrounded (inner tube) projecting beyond the tube that surrounds (outer tube) by a distance substantially the same as the diameter of the first tube.
The distance between the plane of the internal tube 31 (the one that will normally project more) and the plane of the orifice may vary between zero and three outside diameters of the external tube 32, depending on the surface tensions between the liquids and with the gas, and on their viscosity values. Typically, the optimal distance is found experimentally for each particular configuration and each set of liquids used.
The proposed atomizing system obviously requires fluids that are going to be used in the resulting spray to have certain flow parameters. Accordingly, flows for this use must be:
Flows that are suitable so that the system falls within the parametric window of stability. Multiplexing (i.e. several sets of concentric tubes) may be used, if the flows required are greater than those of an individual cell.
Flows that are suitable so that the mass relation of the fluids falls within the specifications of each application. Of course, a greater flow of gas may be supplied externally by any means in specific applications, since this does not interfere with the functioning of the atomizer.
If the flows are varied, the characteristic time of this variation must be less than the hydrodynamic residence times of liquid and gas in the microjet, and less than the inverse of the first natural oscillation frequency of the drop formed at the end of the injection needle.
Therefore, any means for continuous supply of gas (compressors, pressure deposits, etc.) and of liquid (volumetric pumps, pressure bottles) may be used. If multiplexing is desired, the flow of liquid must be as homogeneous as possible between the various cells, which may require impulse through multiple capillary needles, porous media, or any other medium capable of distributing a homogeneous flow among different feeding points.
Each atomizing device will consist of concentric tubes 31, 32 with a diameter ranging between 0.05 and 2 mm, preferably between 0.1 and 0.4 mm, on which the drop from which the microjet emanates can be anchored, and a small orifice (between 0.001 and 2 mm in diameter, preferably between 0.1 and 0.25 mm), facing the drop and separated from the point of feeding by a distance between 0.001 and 2 mm, preferably between 0.2 and 0.5 mm. The orifice puts the suction gas that surrounds the drop, at higher pressure, in touch with the area in which the atomizing is to be attained, at lower pressure.
The embodiments of
The components of the embodiment of
The proposed dispersing device consists of a feeding piece 41 which creates a planar feeding channel through which a where a first fluid 48 flows. The flow is preferably directed through one or more channels of uniform bores that are constructed on the planar surface of the feeding piece 41. A pressure chamber 43 that holds the propelling flow of a second liquid 49, houses the feeding piece 41 and is under a pressure above maintained outside the chamber wall 50. One or more orifices, openings or slots (outlets) 46 made in the wall 52 of the propulsion chamber face the edge of the feeding piece. Preferably, each bore or channel of the feeding piece 41 has its flow path substantially aligned with an outlet 46.
Formation of the microjet and its acceleration are based on the abrupt pressure drop resulting from the steep acceleration undergone by the second fluid 49 on passing through the orifice 46, similarly to the procedure described above for embodiments of
When the second fluid 49 is a gas and the first fluid 48 is a liquid, the microthread formed is quite long and the liquid velocity is much smaller than the gas velocity. In tact, the low viscosity of the gas allows the liquid to flow at a much lower velocity; as a result, the microjet is actually produced and accelerated by stress forces normal to the liquid surface, i.e. pressure forces. Hence, one effective approximation to the phenomenon is to assume that the pressure difference established will result in the same kinetic energy per unit volume for both fluids (liquid and gas), provided gas compressibility effects are neglected. The diameter dj of the microjet formed from a liquid density ρ1 that passes at a volumetric flow-rate Q through an orifice across which a pressure difference ΔPg exists will be given by
See Gañán-Calvo, Physical Review Letters, 80:285–288 (1998).
The relation between the diameter of the microjet, dj, and that of the resulting drops, {overscore (d)}, depends on the ratio between viscous forces and surface tension forces on the liquid on the one hand, and between dynamic forces and surface tension forces on the gas on the other (i.e. on the Ohnesorge and Weber numbers, respectively) (Hinds (Aerosol Technology, John & Sons, 1982), Lefevre (Atomization and Sprays, Hemisphere Pub. Corp., 1989) and Bayvel & Orzechowski (Liquid Atomization, Taylor & Francis, 1993)). At moderate to low gas velocities and low viscosities the relation is roughly identical with that for capillarity instability developed by Rayleigh:
{overscore (d)}=1.89dj
Because the liquid microjet is very long, at high liquid flow-rates the theoretical rupture point lies in the turbulent zone created by the gas jet, so turbulent fluctuations in the gas destabilize or rupture the liquid microjet in a more or less uneven manner. As a result, the benefits of drop size uniformity are lost.
On the other hand, when the second fluid 49 is a liquid and the first fluid 48 is a gas, the facts that the liquid is much more viscous and that the gas is much less dense virtually equalize the fluid and gas velocities. The gas microthread formed is much shorter; however, because its rupture zone is almost invariably located in a laminar flowing stream, dispersion in the size of the microbubbles formed is almost always small. At a volumetric gas flow-rate Qg and a liquid overpressure ΔP1, the diameter of the gas microjet is given by
The low liquid velocity and the absence of relative velocities between the liquid and gas lead to the Rayleigh relation between the diameters of the microthread and those of the bubbles (i.e. d=1.89 dj).
If both fluids 48, 49 are liquid and scarcely viscous, then their relative velocities will be given by
The diameter of a microjet of the first liquid at a volumetric flow-rate of A QA and an overpressure of BΔPB will be given by
At viscosities such that the velocities of both fluids 48, 49 will rapidly equilibrate in the microjet, the diameter of the microjet of the first liquid will be given by
The proposed atomization system obviously requires delivery of the fluids 48, 49 to be used in the dispersion process at appropriate flow-rates. Thus:
The various embodiments of components for creating aerosols described above can be used in devices for the delivery of an aerosol to a patient. The device is preferably a hand-held, self-contained device which a patient can easily carry about and use for the administration of drugs.
In one embodiment the pressurized canister of a device as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,364,838 or 5,404,871 is replaced with an aerosol generating device of the type shown here in any of
In another embodiment the disposable containers and porous membranes of the device disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,544,646 is replaced with an aerosol generating device of the type shown here in
In the two embodiments described above it is preferable to create an aerosol with particles having a particle diameter in the range of about 1 to about 3 microns. This allows the particles to penetrate into the smallest channels of the lungs. However, such particles are not so small that they will not settle on the surface of these channels when inhaled—failure to settle would cause the particles to be exhaled as with particles of smoke.
In yet another embodiment the source of aerosol of a device as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,484,577 is replaced with an aerosol generating device of the type described here and shown in
The following examples are put forth so as to provide those of ordinary skill in the art with a complete disclosure and description of how to make and use the present invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of what the inventors regard as their invention nor are they intended to represent that the experiments below are all or the only experiments performed. Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to numbers used (e.g. amounts, temperature, etc.) but some experimental errors and deviations should be accounted for. Unless indicated otherwise, parts are parts by weight, molecular weight is weight average molecular weight, temperature is in degrees Centigrade, and pressure is at or near atmospheric.
The properties of sixteen different liquids are provided in Table 1
The liquids of Table 1 were forced through a feeding needle of the type shown in
In order to collapse all of the data, we define a reference flow rate Qo and diameter do based on the minimal values, from expressions (3) and (5), that can be attained in stable regime for a given ΔPg:
These definitions provide the advantage of a nondimensional expression for (5), as
dj/do=(8/π2)1/4(Q/Qo)1/2, (7)
which allows for a check for the validity of neglecting the surface tension term in (4) (i.e., Q/Qo should be large).
Notice that if the measured dj follows expression (5), the surface tension cancels out in (7). Also notice that dj/do=We/2.
350 measured values of dj/do versus Q/Qo are plotted in
While the present invention has been described with reference to the specific embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation, material, composition of matter, process, process step or steps, to the objective, spirit and scope of the present invention. All such modifications are intended to be within the scope of the claims appended hereto.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| P9601101 | May 1996 | ES | national |
| P9702654 | Dec 1997 | ES | national |
This application is a continuation of Application Ser. No. 10/216,517 filed Aug. 9, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,792,940 which is a continuation of Application Ser. No. 09/191,317, filed Nov. 13, 1998, now abandoned which is a continuation-in-part of Application Ser. No. 09/171,518 filed Apr. 21, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,119,953, which is a national phase filing of PCT/ES97/00034 under 35 USC §371 filed Feb. 18, 1997 now WO 97/43048, which claims priority of international application P9601101 filed May 13, 1996 under 35 USC §119 and also claims priority to P9702654 filed Dec. 17, 1997 under 35 U.S.C. §119, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties and to which applications we claim priority under 35 USC §120 and 35 USC §119.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 173194 | Wallace | Feb 1876 | A |
| 442785 | Schoettl | Dec 1890 | A |
| 445579 | Weldon | Feb 1891 | A |
| 3700170 | Blanka et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3804255 | Speece | Apr 1974 | A |
| 4141055 | Berry et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4162282 | Fulwyler et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4268460 | Boiarski et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4347935 | Merrill | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4352789 | Thiel | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4363446 | Jaggle et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4444961 | Timm | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4454877 | Miller et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4603671 | Yoshinaga et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4617898 | Gayler | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4628040 | Green et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4649911 | Knight et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4662338 | Itoh et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4694856 | Leibinsohn | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4717049 | Green et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4781968 | Kellerman | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4917857 | Jaeckel | Apr 1990 | A |
| 5020498 | Linder et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5031613 | Smith et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5077176 | Baggio et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5087292 | Garrido | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5095921 | Losee et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5174247 | Tosa et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5180465 | Seki et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5194915 | Gilby | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5230850 | Lewis | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5364632 | Benita et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5364838 | Rubsamen | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5372867 | Hasegawa et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5397001 | Yoon et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5404871 | Goodman et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5458292 | Hapeman | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5522385 | Lloyd et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5554646 | Cook et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5579757 | McMahon et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5579758 | Century | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5597491 | Winkler | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5697341 | Ausman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5740794 | Smith et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5775320 | Patton et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5799711 | Heinonen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5884846 | Tan | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5906198 | Flickinger | May 1999 | A |
| 6119953 | Ganan-Calvo et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6595202 | Ganan-Calvo | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6792940 | Ganan-Calvo | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 563807 | Jul 1975 | CH |
| 4031262 | Apr 1992 | DE |
| 0 249 186 | Dec 1987 | EP |
| 0 250 164 | Dec 1987 | EP |
| 2255291 | Nov 1992 | GB |
| 2099078 | Dec 1992 | GB |
| 59174561 | Oct 1984 | JP |
| 03169331 | Jul 1991 | JP |
| WO 9005583 | May 1990 | WO |
| WO 9118682 | Dec 1991 | WO |
| WO 9411116 | May 1994 | WO |
| WO 9423129 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| WO 9523030 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| WO 9616326 | May 1996 | WO |
| WO 9743048 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO 9744080 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050016526 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10216517 | Aug 2002 | US |
| Child | 10865597 | US | |
| Parent | 09191317 | Nov 1998 | US |
| Child | 10216517 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09171518 | US | |
| Child | 09191317 | US |
