The invention concerns a device and a method for detecting nonlinear electronic components or electronic circuits, especially for detecting the electronics of an improvised explosive device (IED).
A well-known method for detecting nonlinear components is nonlinear junction detection (NLJD). This method has the ability to detect electronic circuits built with semiconductor components. As a result of the nonlinear behavior, signals of a fixed frequency coupled into the circuit are converted to signals with a multiple of the emitted frequency and are reemitted. A method of this type and a corresponding nonlinear junction detector are described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,163,259 A. Another nonlinear junction detector is disclosed by WO 02/065419 A1. Another patent, WO 2004/038455 A1, concerns a method and a device for detecting eavesdropping devices. In principle, the method works by evaluating a second and a third harmonic primary frequency reflected at the target. Information about the presence or absence of an electronic circuit is then derived from these two harmonics.
IED's are devices or explosive booby traps that usually consist of four major groups of components: a trigger, explosives, alone or combined with poisonous chemicals, toxic biological materials or radiological material, and an effector. The trigger can be mechanical or electronic in nature.
To avoid danger, it is necessary to know whether an IED is present, where it is located, when a detonation of this IED is to be feared, and how much and what type of explosive it contains. Other information it would be important to know is whether biological or radioactive materials are present in the IED. In this connection, the explosive can be detected, for example, by known laser technologies or x-rays, and information about the biological content can be obtained, for example, by the use of biosensors. If the IED's additionally contain an electronic system, e.g., an electronic ignition circuit, a search can also be made for the presence of these electronics, for example, by means of the aforementioned NLJD.
The detection range of a target (for example, an IED) depends to a great extent on the signal-to-noise ratio of the harmonic frequencies. In practical investigations, it was determined that there is a difference in detection distance by a factor of almost 8 to 12 between simple circuits and circuits with high-grade shielding. This corresponds to a factor of 4,000-20,000 for the received signal lines.
Due to the signal-to-noise ratio of the amplifier connected on the load side and possible modulation processes, there is a minimum received power at the receiver that is necessary for detection.
With respect to the transmitting power, there are both CW systems (continuous-wave systems) and pulsed systems for manual operation. However, where manual operation is concerned, the transmitting power is limited by values based on personal protection criteria.
The objective of the invention is to specify a method with which the present range of a nonlinear junction detector can be significantly increased.
Previously known NLJD systems operate at a fixed frequency. If this frequency does not coincide with one of the so-called transmission windows of the target, as is often the case, it can happen that, although the signal of the transmitter enters the closed system (target), the detector can recognize neither the second nor the third harmonic frequency, because the closed system just does not have a transmission window in this frequency response. The transmission signal often has not even reached the electronics in the first place.
Therefore, the invention is based on the idea of integrating tunable transmitters and detectors (receivers) in the nonlinear detection systems and of using a narrow-band, variable-frequency signal. In this regard, the scannable frequency range should be 10-1,000 MHz. The receiving frequency for the second and third harmonics is readjusted according to the transmitting frequency.
The goal of the tuning of the transmitter is to reduce the attenuation losses (during the coupling into the case and coupling out of the case of the closed system—the target) and the coupling losses (coupling factor between the power coupled in at the frequency and the power that is transformed into the harmonic frequency). The coupling frequency at which the two harmonics are most strongly reflected again then represents the optimal frequency. If the target is a radio set, the receiving gain of the target can additionally be used if the transmission frequency lies within the receiving bandwidth of the target.
All electronic systems as well as electronically triggered IED's exhibit the phenomenon of being able to communicate with the environment only through a type of holes/open doors. With tunable transmitters/receivers, it now becomes possible to find the frequency holes of a target, especially a shielded target.
The new method now also makes it possible to determine the local position of the target (IED) in a simple way. In addition, the detection distance is significantly greater than that of existing devices.
Another advantage of this solution is that in environments in which devices with different frequencies are present, these frequencies are not considered for detection but rather are excluded during the scanning of the frequency. This also minimizes the error rate.
The invention will now be explained in greater detail with reference to the specific embodiment of the invention illustrated in the drawing.
The single FIGURE is a schematic representation of the invention.
The sole FIGURE shows a nonlinear junction detector 1 for detecting the electronics 2.1 of a target 2. The nonlinear junction detector 1 consists of at least one transmitter 1.1 and at least one receiver 1.2, which, in a preferred design, are installed in a housing 1.3. Separate arrangements of transmitters 1.1 and receivers 1.2 are also possible.
The nonlinear junction detector 1 has at least one antenna 3, by which a narrow-band signal f1 can be emitted within a broadband of several 100 MHz. This one antenna 3 is a broadband antenna that is capable of transmitting and receiving in both polarizations (circularly polarized). The use of two orthogonally arranged antennas (not shown) is also possible, one for transmitting and the other for receiving.
Corresponding to the emitted frequency f1, only signals of the frequencies f2=2*f1 and f3=3*f1 are received in the receiving range of the receiver/detector 1.2 and evaluated. In this regard, the frequency f1 can be varied by an electronic unit 4 both linearly and in specific steps. This variation is continued until an optimal transmission frequency f1 has been established. (This can be recognized from the fact that the two harmonics also reach the receiver 1.2 again with a maximum signal strength. In this regard, it can be assumed that the optimal transmission frequency f1 as well as the harmonics coincide with the so-called transmission windows of the target 2 and represent the receiving bandwidth of the target.) The target 2 is then irradiated with this optimal or optimized frequency f1, and the presence of nonlinear circuits or components in the target 2 can be concluded from the transformed response in the receiver/detector 1.2. This optimized frequency f1 allows a greater distance between the junction detector 1 and the target 2.
In cases in which the input amplification of the target 2 is used, it is advisable to select a frequency that is typical for the communication of these targets 2.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 038 627 | Aug 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/006461 | 7/20/2007 | WO | 00 | 2/17/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/019750 | 2/21/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3028596 | McGillen et al. | Apr 1962 | A |
3599211 | Mardon | Aug 1971 | A |
3631484 | Augenblick | Dec 1971 | A |
3732567 | Low et al. | May 1973 | A |
3911435 | Mardon et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4035797 | Nagy | Jul 1977 | A |
4053891 | Opitz | Oct 1977 | A |
4303910 | McCann | Dec 1981 | A |
5177445 | Cross | Jan 1993 | A |
5191343 | Danzer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5227800 | Huguenin et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5381153 | Saito et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5552705 | Keller | Sep 1996 | A |
6049301 | Weagant | Apr 2000 | A |
6057765 | Jones et al. | May 2000 | A |
6163259 | Barsumian et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6243036 | Chadwick et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6359582 | MacAleese et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6480141 | Toth et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6765527 | Jablonski et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6864825 | Holly | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6897777 | Holmes et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6933878 | Molyneux-Berry | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6967612 | Gorman et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6999041 | Holly | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7142147 | Holly | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162285 | Owens et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167123 | Hausner et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7183964 | Steinway et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7391356 | Brumley et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7450052 | Hausner et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7512511 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7639178 | Mulbrook et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
20030034444 | Chadwick et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030179126 | Jablonski et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040041724 | Levitan et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040095243 | Holmes et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050064922 | Owens et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050179612 | Holly et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060082488 | Keller | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070013577 | Schnitzer et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070063886 | Brumley et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080254738 | Brumley et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100182189 | Jung et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 381 077 | Apr 2003 | GB |
2381077 | Apr 2003 | GB |
02065419 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2004038455 | May 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100182189 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |