This application claims priority to PCT/EP2013/050393, filed Apr. 11, 2013, which claims priority to Swedish Patent Application No. 1250362-9, filed Apr. 11, 2012, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The invention relates to a container for sunscreen agent in which the sunscreen agent has a predetermined sun-protection factor, comprising a sealing device by which the container can be closed to make its orifice completely sealed, the container being provided with at least one sun sensor arranged to indicate the current UV intensity by changing its hue depending on the UV intensity of the radiation striking the sensor.
It is previously known to use sun sensors comprising a photochromic ink to measure the UV intensity. For instance, US2005285050 discloses a container for sunscreen agent comprising a sun detector designed to indicate when the cumulative UV radiation to which the bottle (detector) has been exposed reaches a threshold value. Further, sun detectors of a similar nature have previously been used on “sun cards” and on bracelets for the user/wearer to determine the strength of solar radiation.
There is a widespread and ever-increasing need for protection against UV radiation due to the risk of cancer, while many people still desire to spend time in the sun because it is pleasant or in order to tan (i.e., for beauty reasons). Being able to tan safely is therefore desirable, and there is a need for new and improved products for the purpose.
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved product for the determination of safe tanning time under current circumstances, depending on the user's skin type.
The object of the invention is accomplished by a product according to claim 1.
According to one aspect of the invention, the invention comprises a container/bottle for sunscreen agent, where the sunscreen agent has a specific sun-protection factor, provided with a sealing device/cap by which the container can be sealed such that its orifice becomes completely blocked. The container is provided with at least one sun sensor arranged to indicate the current UV intensity by changing its hue depending on the UV intensity of the radiation striking the sensor. The container further comprises a colour-reference range for comparative reading of the sensor hue to enable the determination of UV intensity. Further, the container is provided with a skin-type indicator for determining the skin type of a specific user, and a time indicator for determining the period of time during which a person of a specific skin type can expose his or her skin to solar radiation at said determined UV intensity without suffering from sunburn. Sunburn occurs before the skin is visibly burnt. The combination of sun sensor and time-table, along with information on the skin type and the sun-protection factor of the lotion, results in the unique product and protection. Thanks to the product according to the invention, a user can easily and quickly determine for how long it is safe to stay in the sun without getting sunburn—herein referred to as “safe tanning time.” The container preferably contains sunscreen agent having a specific, predetermined factor. Said sun sensor is arranged as an integral part of the container and is positioned such that it is completely covered by the sealing device when the sealing device is sealed.
The invention enables the use of a UV-sensitive, photochromic indicator (also called “sun sensor”) to determine the solar intensity, which, together with information on skin type makes it possible to determine the time during which a user can stay in the sun without suffering from sunburn. In a preferred embodiment, the product is adapted to determine said safe tanning time if the person in question applies a sun-protection product with a specific factor to the skin. Thanks to the design of the product, the photochromic indicator will be protected from UV radiation when not in use, which protects it from unnecessary wear and significantly extends product life. If the sensor is continually exposed to UV light, its performance will quickly diminish, making it unreliable for its purpose. Thanks to the invention, however, the sensor itself will not to be a limitation to the expiry of the product, which may contribute to, for instance, potentially extended shelf life both of containers that have not yet been filled with sunscreen agent, and of containers containing sunscreen agent. Thereby, the product according to the invention contributes to potentially simplified logistics and prevents unnecessary disposal of containers (due to worn-out sensor), as compared to existing products.
According to one aspect of the invention, the sun sensor is located at the top portion of the container at such a position that it is fully protected by the cap when the latter is in place. The design and position of the sensor results in maximised exposure of the sensor to sunlight when the cap is removed, the sensor also being located at such a distance from the orifice of the bottle that it does not risk being smeared with sun lotion (or other sunscreen agent, such as spray). Once the cap is removed from the bottle top, the sensor will be exposed to sunlight and its position contributes to the very quick reaction of the photochromic ink to the current UV intensity, the ink switching to the corresponding hue.
In another aspect of the invention, the container comprises an orifice at its top portion, through which the sunscreen product (e.g., the sun lotion), contained in the container is intended to be dispensed. The sun sensor is preferably located at a specific distance from the orifice to minimise the risk of the sun-protection product falling on the sensor and blocking it. The container cap hereby acts as tight seal of the orifice and as a protection of the sensor, preventing it from unnecessary wear by UV light.
The invention will now be more closely described using embodiments referring to appended drawings, in which
In
The container 1 further comprises a colour-reference range 4 for comparative reading of the hue of the sensor 3 to enable the determination of UV intensity. Preferably, the reference range 4 is positioned in close proximity to the sensor 3, such that the hue of the sensor can be easily compared to the colour scale of the reference range. In one embodiment, the sensor 3 is in the form of an elongate strip located next to the reference range 4, preferably along the entire length of the reference range as seen in
The reference range 4 will be described in more detail in connection with
It is contemplated that the sensor 3 can be designed in other ways than as a strip, and also that it can be positioned in another way than described above. According to an aspect of the invention (not shown), the sun sensor 3 is positioned further up on the top portion 7 of the container 1, in an section which, when the bottle is positioned vertically upright on a horizontal flat surface, is at a substantially upward angle. Such a container design, along with the position of the sensor 3, causes the bottle 1 to, when in use, maximise the exposure of the sensor to sunlight, as the sensor is then turned upwards corresponding to the upward direction of the sky when outdoors. Once the cap 2 is removed from the bottle, the sensor 3 will be exposed to sunlight, and its position at the top portion of the container 1 contributes to the photochromic ink reacting rapidly to the current UV intensity and switching to the corresponding hue.
Further, the container 1 is provided with a sun matrix 5 comprising a time indicator 50 for determining the period of time during which a person of a specific skin type can expose his or her skin to solar radiation at said determined UV intensity without suffering from sunburn. Herein, this time period is also referred to as “safe tanning time.” The time indicator is preferably calibrated according to the protection factor of the sunscreen agent contained in the bottle, which means that the safe tanning time is correct provided that said person has applied sunscreen agent from the container 1 to his or her skin. The sun matrix 5 is positioned to be easily read, preferably on the body 9 of the bottle.
In the example shown, the range comprises four levels of UV intensity with the corresponding hue: weak 41, medium 42, strong 43 and extreme 44.
The most sensitive skin type, skin type 1, numbered 51, is characterised by noticeably fair skin, ruddy hair, blue eyes, always burns and rarely tans.
Skin type 2, classified as the second most sensitive and numbered 52, is characterised by fair complexion, blonde to light brown hair, blue to gray or green eyes, usually tans and sometimes burns.
Less sensitive is skin type 3, numbered 53 in the table, usually having normal complexion, dark blonde to brown hair, gray to brown eyes, always tans and rarely burns.
Finally, skin type 4, being the least sensitive, here numbered 54, is characterised by light brown to olive-coloured skin, dark hair and dark eyes, always tans and never burns.
Along with the matrix 5 there is a table/time indicator 50 showing for how long the user can tan depending on his or her skin type, and whether or not the user is accustomed to sun without sunburn occurring.
The sun matrix 5 further comprises a time indicator 50 for reading the safe tanning time. Information on skin type and current UV intensity enables reading, in the time indicator, a time interval corresponding to the time period during which the person can stay in the sun without getting sunburn, provided sunscreen agent from the container has been applied to the skin. According to one embodiment, the time indicator 50 comprises, for each skin type, information on safe tanning time depending on whether the person is accustomed to sun 55 or unaccustomed to sun 56.
The use of the product according to the invention will now be described with reference to
The container cap 2 is removed from the bottle 1, and the user applies the product to the skin portion that will be exposed to sunlight. The container is positioned such that the uncovered sun sensor 3 is exposed to light (e.g., standing on the ground), if weather permits in such a way that the sensor 3 lands in/faces the sun. Depending on the current UV intensity, the hue of the sensor 3 will change. Once the sensor 3 exhibits a stable hue (i.e., one that does not noticeably change colour), the hue of the sensor 3 is compared to the colours of the reference range 4 at the top of the bottle. This provides information on the current UV intensity. The user can determine his or her own skin type by comparing it to the skin-type indicator on the side/body 9 of the bottle. Information on skin type and current UV intensity is then used to ascertain the safe tanning time in the time indicator 50 of the sun matrix 5, which is visibly located on the side/body 9 of the container 1.
Lisa has red hair and very sensitive and fair skin. According to the skin-type indicator, Lisa is of skin type 1. After having applied sunscreen agent, Lisa puts the bottle with the sensor 3 facing the sun. The sensor 3 indicates that the sun is currently strong 43. This day, Lisa is not accustomed to sun. It is early spring in Sweden, but the sun is strong. The sun matrix 5 shows that Lisa can stay for 45 minutes in the sun under current circumstances without risking sunburn.
Naturally, the invention is not in any way limited to the preferred embodiments described above, but many potential modifications thereof should be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the appended claims. For instance, the bottle in the drawings is shown as an elongated cylindrical body, but those skilled in the art understand that the container shape can be varied in countless ways, as long as the bottle top portion can be adapted such that the container cap protects the sensor while also sealing the orifice of the bottle, the sensor fitting in its position at such a distance from the orifice 8 that the bottle contents do not risk falling on the sensor 3, thereby impairing its performance.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1250362 | Apr 2012 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2013/050393 | 4/11/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/154492 | 10/17/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3899677 | Hori | Aug 1975 | A |
3903423 | Zweig | Sep 1975 | A |
4198861 | Mung-Kuen Luk | Apr 1980 | A |
4271984 | Ducros | Jun 1981 | A |
4408557 | Bradley | Oct 1983 | A |
4762124 | Kerch | Aug 1988 | A |
4818491 | Fariss | Apr 1989 | A |
4863282 | Rickson | Sep 1989 | A |
4919983 | Fremin | Apr 1990 | A |
4952498 | Waters | Aug 1990 | A |
5036311 | Moran | Jul 1991 | A |
5117116 | Bannard | May 1992 | A |
5190175 | Schmidt | Mar 1993 | A |
5365068 | Dickerson | Nov 1994 | A |
5387798 | Funakoshi | Feb 1995 | A |
5391883 | Kinsey | Feb 1995 | A |
D376547 | McRae | Dec 1996 | S |
5581090 | Goudjil | Dec 1996 | A |
5589398 | Krause | Dec 1996 | A |
5612542 | Brown | Mar 1997 | A |
5686727 | Reenstra | Nov 1997 | A |
5720555 | Elele | Feb 1998 | A |
5802015 | Rothschild | Sep 1998 | A |
5986273 | Tripp | Nov 1999 | A |
6046455 | Ribi | Apr 2000 | A |
6085942 | Redmond | Jul 2000 | A |
6086858 | McEleney | Jul 2000 | A |
6348694 | Gershteyn | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6378906 | Pennaz | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6405867 | Moore | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6437346 | Goudjil | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6555028 | Walters | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6698590 | Moore | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726013 | Pennaz | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734440 | Questel | May 2004 | B2 |
6817192 | Ector, Jr. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6929136 | Salazar-Leal | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936824 | Takada | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7227153 | Yagi | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7247140 | Ophardt | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7265358 | Fontaine | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7500746 | Howell | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7509839 | Duranton | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7907477 | Puzia | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8897100 | Joo | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20020022008 | Forest | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030056410 | Witkowski | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030226978 | Ribi | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040031927 | Tsai | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040155199 | Su | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050145525 | Williams | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050255050 | Trunk | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050285050 | Bruce | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060067896 | Schaffer | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080000992 | Mediare | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080121816 | Ellig | May 2008 | A1 |
20080265170 | Ales | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090147215 | Howell | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090284732 | Vitale | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100163749 | Hunwick, III | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120153179 | Tew | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168333 | Mackay | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102010006676 | Nov 2010 | DE |
0333424 | Sep 1989 | EP |
9905038 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9905038 | Feb 1999 | WO |
2010139978 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2010139978 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Jun. 25, 2013 corresponding to International Patent Application No. PCT/SE2013/050393, 5 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 26, 2015 corresponding to European Patent Application No. 13775308.3, 5 pages. |
Patent Exam Report dated Sep. 16, 2015 corresponding to Australian Patent Application No. 2013247416, 3 pages. |
European Communication dated Mar. 4, 2016 in European Application No. 13 775 308.3-1562, 4 pages. |
Patent Examination Report No. 2 dated Jan. 18, 2016 corresponding to Australian Patent Application No. 2013247416, 4 pages. |
Professor Hans Christian Wulf, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark; “Test Report of UV-sensor, Sweden patent SE 536 450 C2, SkinPlan®”; undated test report commissioned by New Medic Era AB, tockholm, Sweden; obtained from New Medic Era AB in Jul. 2017; 19 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150083934 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |