This application is a 35 USC 371 application of PTC/EP 2007/056659 filed on Jul. 3, 2007.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention is based on a device and a method for ejecting at least one capsule.
2. Description of the Prior Art
One device of this generic type is already known from German Patent Disclosure DE 103 51 212 A1. A machine for filling and closing two-piece capsules includes a capsule ejector for axially ejecting the capsules from their respective receptacle. Guide flaps that are individually triggerable and can be pivoted relative to a pivot axis and are each associated with one capsule receptacle are provided. They each include two guide tracks for the respective associated capsule. The ejected capsule is put on either one or the other guide track, depending on whether the capsule is in order or is defective. As a result, capsules that are in order are separated from defective capsules.
However, this device is relatively complex. It is therefore the object of the present invention to disclose a device and method that in a simple way enable individual capsule ejection. This object is attained by the characteristics of the dependent claims.
The device of the invention and the method for ejecting at least one capsule have the advantage over the prior art that multiple ejecting mechanisms can already be triggered individually and independently of one another. As a result, it becomes possible, in the event of a defective capsule, to discard that capsule individually. Because the motion of the ejecting mechanism, which in particular is ejecting a defective capsule, is varied in a targeted way, downstream sorting devices can be dispensed with. According to the invention, only the ejecting mechanisms which are intended to lead to an ejection of that particular capsule are moved upward. In a following station, all the capsules that still remain can then be ejected. The resultant device is relatively simple in construction, since a suitable drive construction must be provided anyway for moving the ejecting mechanisms. All that is additionally needed is to provide individual control elements, for instance in the form of pneumatic cylinders, for each ejecting mechanism individually, and these control elements assure that depending on the desired capsule rejection, the appropriate ejecting mechanism is moved in the ejection direction together with the carriage.
In an expedient refinement, it is provided that the slaving control means include a carriage that is movable in the ejection direction. By way of this carriage, the various ejecting mechanisms can be moved in the ejection direction, regardless of which ejecting mechanisms is supposed to eject the associated capsule at that time or not. This simplifies the drive construction, since only a single part has to be set in motion.
In an expedient refinement, it is provided that the slaving control mechanism put the applicable ejecting mechanism into communication with the carriage in such a way that this ejecting mechanism is movable in the ejection direction together with the carriage. According to the invention, the slaving control mechanism is thus disposed on the carriage, thereby making a space-saving construction possible. The slaving control mechanism can now act directly on the ejecting mechanisms, which are preferably guided in the carriage.
In an expedient refinement, it is provided that as control elements, cylinders, in particular pneumatic cylinders, are used. These are distinguished by easy triggering.
One exemplary embodiment is shown in the drawing and will be described in further detail below, in which:
In
The device for ejecting at least one capsule 24 will now be described in further detail in conjunction with
In
The ejection device functions as follows: The motion of the plurality of ejecting means 18 is controlled via a single carriage 16. Depending on the cycle of the conveyor wheel, the carriage 16 moves one time per cycle in the ejection direction. From
In the next cycle, the carriage 16 is moved back to its lower position, as shown in
Various concepts for how the control pistons 23 and thus the ejecting means 18 can be individually triggered are conceivable. The goal of the device in every case is to separate incorrectly filled capsules 24 from capsules 24 that are in order. To that end, in a first variant, the defective capsules 24 can be ejected in a targeted way in the station 10. The weighing device 13 provides the information to a controller as to which of the capsules 13 are in order or defective. If in station 10 the defective capsules 24 are not to be ejected, then the control pistons 23 associated with the various defective capsules 24 and the associated ejecting means 18 are moved in the direction of the recess 17. The control pistons 23 of those ejecting means 18 that are disposed below capsules 24 that are in order are conversely not moved. Only those ejecting means 18 that are located below a defective capsule 24 are slaved in the ejection direction by the carriage 16; ejecting means 18 located below capsules 24 that are in order are not slaved in the ejection direction by the carriage 16. At the station 10, all the defective capsules 24 located in the holder 22 are expelled. After leaving the station 10, thus only the capsules 24 that are in order are in the holder 22. They are then taken out at the station 11. Now, a targeted triggering of the ejecting means 18 is no longer necessary; that is, all the ejecting means 18 can be moved into each of the capsule receptacles 25 of the holder 22, so that all the capsules 24 still located in the holder 22 can be ejected.
In a second variant, it would also be conceivable for only the capsules 24 that are in order to be ejected in station 10. Thus those control pistons 23 that are associated with the properly filled capsules 24 are triggered. Ejecting means 18 associated with defective capsules 24 are not moved in the ejection direction by the carriage 16. After leaving the station 10, in the second variant, there are then only defective capsules 24 in the holder 22. These defective capsules 24 are all ejected in work station 11. All the ejector pins in work station 11 are moved in the ejection direction and convey the defective capsules 24, still located therein, out of the holder 22.
The device and method for ejecting at least one capsule is employed especially in hard gelatin capsule filling machines. In them, the capsules can be filled with powder, pellets, liquids, or tablets. Still other methods for ascertaining a properly or incorrectly filled capsule 24 can be imagined. All that is necessary are suitable criteria by which a capsule 24 that is in order can be distinguished from a defective capsule.
The foregoing relates to the preferred exemplary embodiment of the invention, it being understood that other variants and embodiments thereof are possible within the spirit and scope of the invention, the latter being defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 035 280 | Jul 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/056659 | 7/3/2007 | WO | 00 | 12/19/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/015065 | 2/7/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5018335 | Yamamoto et al. | May 1991 | A |
6434911 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6834475 | Trebbi et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
20070044433 | Runft et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1586266 | Oct 1970 | DE |
10351212 | Jun 2005 | DE |
102004048007 | Apr 2006 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100164144 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |