The present disclosure relates to implantable medical devices such as fluid flow control devices including adjustable valves and also relates to tools for determining the location and settings of an adjustable valve. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to tools for finding the magnetic center and indicating a setting of an implantable adjustable valve.
Generally, a fluid flow control device includes a one-way control valve for controlling the flow of cerebrospinal (CSF) fluid out of a brain ventricle and preventing backflow of fluid into the brain ventricle. Hydrocephalus, a neurological condition which may affect infants, children and adults, results from an undesirable accumulation of fluids, such as CSF, within the ventricles, or cavities, of the brain and which accumulation may exert extreme pressure with brain and skull deforming forces, the latter in infants. Treatment of hydrocephalus often involves draining CSF away from the brain ventricles utilizing a drainage or shunt system including one or more catheters and a valve which may generally be described as a fluid flow control device or shunt valve. The shunt valve, or fluid flow control device, may have a variety of configurations and may be adjustable in that the valve mechanism of the device may be set to a threshold pressure level at which fluid may be allowed to begin to flow through the valve and drain away from the brain. Shunt valves may be subcutaneously implantable and percutaneously adjustable to various pressure settings. Examples of fluid flow control devices are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,637,083 entitled, “Implantable Adjustable Fluid Flow Control Valve”, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/804,875 entitled, “Fluid Flow Control Devices, Rotors and Magnets with Increased Resistance to Inadvertent Setting Change and Improved Accessory Tool Coupling”, incorporated by reference herein in their respective entireties.
Adjustable valves may include magnetic components which allow an external tool or tools to selectively and non-invasively determine the setting of the implanted valve and adjust the setting to a desired pressure. A tool set typically includes: a locator tool, which allows tactile determination of the orientation and position of the implanted valve; an indicator tool, to determine the current setting of the adjustable valve and confirm new settings of the valve after the new settings have been implemented; and an adjustment tool to change the setting of the valve. The tools are designed to externally (i.e., external to a patient) couple with a magnet of the adjustable valve such that upon coupling, the setting of the valve may be determined and the valve magnet may be deliberately manipulated to thereby adjust the pressure setting of the valve without removal of the subcutaneously implanted device. Indicator and adjustment tools thus rely on magnetic coupling of the tool to the adjustable valve, where the magnetic coupling is strong enough to determine or to adjust the position of the valve magnet even through tissue (e.g., a patient's scalp). Examples of locator, indicator and adjustment tools are shown, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0022793 (hereinafter, “the '793 application”) to Bertrand et al. entitled, “Tool for Adjusting an Implantable Adjustable Fluid Flow Control Valve” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,883,241 to Moskowitz, et al., entitled, “Compass-Based Indicator with Magnetic Shielding”, incorporated by reference herein in their respective entireties.
Locator, indicator and adjustment tools may be used in conjunction with one another. For example, after the tactile determination of a valve's position has been made in conjunction with a locator tool, an indicator and/or adjustment tool may be positioned in a location determined by the locator tool. In other words, an indicator and/or adjustment tool position may be based off of or may be “keyed to” the locator tool position. The position of an adjustable valve, as determined by the locator tool, allows the indicator and/or adjustment tools to be placed in sufficient proximity to the magnetic components of the implanted valve such that the valve magnet or magnets align and/or couple with the magnetized tool elements or magnets. However, the magnetized element of an indicator tool may tend toward alignment with the earth's magnetic field if the pull of the magnet in the implanted valve is not sufficiently strong (such as when the distance between the implanted valve magnet or magnets and the tool increases) and could lead to inaccurate device setting determinations or indications.
In addition, magnetic components of the adjustable valve itself may be susceptible to movement or inadvertent setting adjustment by strong nearby magnetic fields since the internal magnetic elements of a valve may tend to align with an external field. An adjustable valve might therefore be unintentionally adjusted when in the presence of a strong external magnetic field, such as encountered in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedure. Thus, some fluid flow control devices include features which provide increased resistance to inadvertent setting changes. For example, mechanical “stops” or magnet configurations designed to resist strong nearby magnetic fields may be incorporated into a device such as disclosed, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/804,875, referred to above. Deliberate adjustment of these types of valves, in some cases, may be more difficult to achieve without an accurate alignment of the adjustment tool to the valve magnet.
In order to accurately magnetically align or couple a tool to an implanted valve (for example, to avoid effects of the earth's magnetic field on the tool or to ensure a sufficient coupling of a tool to a valve for valve setting indication and adjustment purposes), it may thus be desirable to find the magnetic center of the valve magnet and thereby position a tool in magnetic alignment with the magnetic center of the valve magnet. Aligning an external tool with the magnetic center of the valve can provide coupling of the tool to the valve which allows an accurate or more accurate reading of a valve setting and allows deliberate adjustment of the valve to be carried out, even where the distance between the implanted valve and the external tool is increased, and/or in cases where an implantable valve is designed for increased resistance to inadvertent setting changes.
The '793 publication depicts examples of tools which may be useful with an adjustable valve and which may be used in conjunction with the centering and centering-indicator tools 50, 150, 250 (
As further described in the '793 publication, the locator central opening allows locator tool to be oriented to and aligned with an implanted valve in a predictable manner and allows the physician to palpate the implanted valve through opening. In use, after orientation of the implanted valve has been established by locator tool, indicator central body is placed within tube of locator tool. Indicator and locator tools may comprise alignment features. For example, when indicator central body is placed within tube, a ridge of the indicator tool aligns and interacts with a slot of the locator tool to precisely orient the indicator tool with the locator tool. Other alignment features of the indicator and locator tools are contemplated. In any event, placement of indicator tool into locator tool allows the indicator tool pointer to interact with and align itself with the magnet 120 of the valve 20. This will cause the pointer to point to a spot on the index indicating the position of the magnet 120 of the valve 20. The position of the magnet 120, as described above, indicates the setting of the valve.
The '793 publication further describes an adjustment tool having a magnet fixed in place in an adjustment central body, an indentation and an arrow. Adjustment central body may include a series of indentations configured to interact with a protrusion on the locator tool. Indentations may be spaced around the periphery of the adjustment central body corresponding to the location of the settings of the valve 20. In use, the adjustment tool is positioned above the locator tool with the arrow aligned with the pressure level setting on index, the pressure level setting of the valve having been determined previously by the indicator tool as described above or by other methods such as x-ray or fluoroscopy. Maintaining alignment, the adjustment tool is lowered toward the locator tool until the adjustment central body enters the tube. Where an indicator tool has been used to determine the valve setting, the indicator tool is removed prior locating the adjustment tool into the locator tool. The protrusion on the locator tool interacts with an indentation on the adjustment central body corresponding to the current valve setting. In this position, the adjustment tool magnet couples with the valve magnet and the adjustment tool is rotated so that the arrow points to the desired valve setting indicated on index.
Other examples of devices for locating, indicating and adjusting the setting of an adjustable valve are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,334,582 to Bertrand, et. al., “Electronic Valve Reader”, U.S. Pat. No. 8,015,977 to Bertrand, et. al., “Indicator Tool for Use with an Implantable Medical Device”, and U.S. Pat. No. 8,257,296 to Bertrand et. al., “System Including an Implantable Medical Device and Electronic Valve Indicator and Locator Device”, incorporated by reference herein in their respective entireties.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,921,571 to Moureaux et al., “Device for Mechanically Locating and Reading the Setting of An Adjustable Valve” proposes a device for mechanically and reading the setting of an adjustable magnetic valve which describes a three-dimensionally pivoting compass including a needle and pin mounted on a pivot.
Devices according to the disclosure include a centering tool having a housing including a cavity and a magnetic capsule disposed in the cavity where the magnetic capsule comprises a tool magnet. The magnetic capsule is configured to move within the cavity to center within a target on the tool when the tool magnet is magnetically aligned with a magnet of an adjustable valve.
In some embodiments, a combined centering-indicator tool includes a housing including a cavity and an index on the housing comprising adjustable valve setting values, a magnetic capsule disposed within the cavity comprising a tool magnet and a pointer, and a target. The magnetic capsule is configured to move within the cavity to center itself within the target when the tool magnet is magnetically aligned with the magnetic center of the adjustable valve magnet and can rotate with respect to an axis of the capsule such that the pointer rotates to point to a valve setting value on the index.
In some embodiments, a system includes a locator tool having a tube for receiving a centering tool or a combined centering-indicator tool, the centering tool or combined-centering tool including a housing and a cavity, a magnetic capsule disposed within the cavity and a target provided on the centering or centering-indicator tool, where the magnetic capsule is configured to move within the cavity to center itself within the target when the tool magnet is magnetically aligned with the magnetic center of an adjustable valve magnet, the magnetic capsule also configured to rotate within the cavity. Where the tool includes an index and a pointer on or part of the magnetic capsule, rotation of the magnetic capsule may allow the pointer to rotate to point to a valve setting value on the index when the tool magnet is aligned with the valve magnet. The centering or combined centering-indicator tool is configured to be positioned within the tube of the locator tool when the locator tool is in proximity to the implanted adjustable valve.
In some embodiments including those described above, the magnetic capsule can be visible through a wall of the housing and may comprise a magnetic capsule housing having various shapes including a circular or disk-like shape. The tool magnet may include one or more magnets and each magnet may include vertical or horizontal polarity. Tool magnets of the present disclosure can also include a metal strip or strips or a Halbach array for strengthening the magnetic field to a side of the tool magnet. The target may have a perimeter substantially the same size as or slightly larger than the perimeter of the magnetic capsule or the magnetic capsule housing. A fluid may be disposed within the cavity and the magnetic capsule may move within the fluid.
The present disclosure provides centering and combined centering-indicator tools (e.g., 50, 150, 250
As also described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/804,875, the rotor magnet 120 may include a single magnet or dual magnets with horizontally or vertically aligned polarity. Rotor assembly 100 may be provided within a cartridge assembly 40 and may include an element such as a groove or a notch (not shown) which interacts with an element on a portion of the cartridge assembly 40 such as a spline or a tab (not shown). By including a particular magnet orientation or interacting elements on the rotor assembly 100 and cartridge assembly 40, the rotor assembly 100 may have an increased resistance to undesired rotation and therefore the valve 20 may have an increased resistance to inadvertent pressure setting changes, such as when a patient having an implanted valve is in the presence of a strong magnetic field (e.g., an MRI device).
As described above, it may be desirable to locate the center of the valve magnet 120 prior to making a valve setting determination and/or prior to adjusting the valve setting. As also described above, finding the magnetic center of valve 20 may serve to more easily, accurately or precisely align and couple an external tool 140 to the valve. The remaining Figures depict embodiments of centering and centering-indicator tools and tool elements useful with devices (e.g., adjustable valves) and/or useful with various locator, indicator or adjustment tools.
Provided within cavity 70 is a magnetic capsule 80 and a target 81. In general terms, magnetic capsule 80 (also 80′, 80″,
Tool magnet 84 may likewise comprise several different magnet configurations. Some non-limiting examples of the magnet configurations contemplated by the present disclosure are depicted in
Returning to
Magnetic capsule 80 may be configured to slidably move, float or suspend within cavity 70 and may be configured to rest on or float just above cavity floor 72 or may be configured to be suspended within cavity 72 at any distance between cavity floor 72 and cavity top or ceiling 76. In some embodiments the space between the magnetic capsule and the floor 72 is limited and configured to be as small as possible so as to keep the magnetic capsule 80 as close to the floor 72 as possible thereby providing a closer relationship between the magnetic capsule 80 and the valve magnet 120. Regardless, magnetic capsule 80 is configured to center within a target 81 when positioned over the magnetic center of a magnet (e.g., 120,
Target 81 may have a shape which is substantially the same as the shape of magnet 84 or magnetic capsule 80. The target 81 may include a line or a solid (i.e., “filled-in”) shape and may have an outer periphery, perimeter or edge which is the same as or slightly larger than that of the tool magnet 84 or magnetic capsule 80. Where the target 81 comprises an outer periphery that is approximately the same size as the outer perimeter of the magnetic capsule 80, the target 81 will essentially be covered or obscured. Where the target 81 includes an outer periphery that is larger than the outer perimeter of the magnetic capsule, as can be seen in
An exemplary use of tools 50, 150, 250 is illustrated in
Although the present disclosure has been described with reference to particular embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4676772 | Hooven | Jun 1987 | A |
5637083 | Bertrand et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643194 | Negre | Jul 1997 | A |
5758667 | Slettenmark | Jun 1998 | A |
5944023 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6050969 | Kraus | Apr 2000 | A |
6138681 | Chen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6234956 | He et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6391019 | Ito | May 2002 | B1 |
6417750 | Sohn | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439538 | Ito | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6657351 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6702249 | Ito | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6840917 | Marion | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6951059 | Moskowitz et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7057369 | Hoffmann | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7255682 | Bartol, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7334582 | Bertrand et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7334594 | Ludin | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338028 | Zimmerling et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7422566 | Miethke | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7485105 | Wolf | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7771381 | McCusker et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7856987 | Bertrand et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7921571 | Moureaux et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8038641 | Soares et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8057422 | Wolf, II | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8123714 | Ludin et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8171938 | Bengtson | May 2012 | B2 |
8241240 | Murphy | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8322365 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8398577 | Burnett | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8398617 | Ginggen et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8518023 | Roth et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8539956 | Bertrand et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8591499 | Girardin et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8617142 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8622978 | Bertrand et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630695 | Negre et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8733394 | Negre et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8753331 | Murphy | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8763637 | Soldo et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8813757 | Prisco et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20010022350 | Ito | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20050022403 | Moskowitz et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055009 | Rosenberg | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070004999 | Miethke | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080083413 | Forsell | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090076597 | Dahlgren et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100199506 | Moureaux et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110048539 | Negre et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066098 | Stergiopulos | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110105991 | Roth et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110105992 | Girardin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110105993 | Girardin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110118589 | Negre et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110295104 | Teitelbaum et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120029414 | Wolf, II | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120046595 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120046596 | Ludin et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120197178 | Prisco et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130002243 | Bertrand et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130085441 | Aihara | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130345646 | Bertrand et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140052047 | Wilson | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140121586 | Bertrand et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140257166 | Wolf, II | Sep 2014 | A9 |
20140261793 | Shah et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276340 | Ludin et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276346 | Sadanand | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102007059300 | Jun 2009 | DE |
2009066133 | May 2009 | WO |
2011136241 | Mar 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/027222 mailed Jun. 24, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140261793 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |