The technical field generally relates methods and devices used for determining and/or assaying forces applied by cells.
Current technologies used to study cell contractile forces include traction force microscopy (TFM) of substrates having embedded fluorescent particles. In TFM, cells are cultured as a monolayer on the surface of a thin substrate with fluorescent microspheres (e.g., latex beads) embedded therein. In another method, microfabricated silicone elastomeric post arrays have been developed for measuring the traction forces of adherent cells. See e.g., Sniadecki et al., Microfabricated Silicone Elastomeric Post Arrays for Measuring Traction Forces of Adherent Cells, Methods in Cell Biology, Vol. 83 (2007). In this method a vector map of traction forces is obtained by measuring the deflection of each micropost. Cellular contractile forces can also be measured indirectly by atomic force microscopy (AFM). AFM has been used to measure stiffness of cell cytoskeleton, which is broadly correlated to contractility through myosin contraction of the actin cytoskeleton. These approaches have been used to map stem cells, and correlated to the metastatic potential of cancer cells. Elastomeric micropillars have been used to track the contractility of stem cells, and researchers have found variation in contractility during differentiation. See J. Fu, et al., Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates, Nature Methods, Vol. 7, pp. 733-739, (2010).
TFM, which operates by mapping forces on the substrate as cells translocate across soft substrates and stretch the substrate, has been used to map forces in the leading vs. retracting edge during cell migration. Despite the usefulness of these methodologies, these techniques are not amenable to simple, high-throughput extraction of contractility measures from mixed populations of cells with rare sub-populations that need high numbers to statistically sample. These types of samples would be seen from a patient sample or mixed culture. Additionally, these previous techniques require high-resolution imaging and precise focusing of optical systems which make them less compatible for high-throughput analysis needed for example in attempting to screen for effect of a large number of drugs on force production. There thus is a need for better methods and systems for identifying and quantifying the forces applied by cells, including populations of cells with rare phenotypes.
In one aspect of the invention, a system for assaying forces applied by cells includes an optically transparent substrate comprising a soft material having a Young's modulus within the range of about 3 kPa to about 100 kPa. An array of molecular patterns is disposed on a surface of the optically transparent substrate, the molecular pattern comprising fluorophore-conjugated patterns adherent to cells. The system includes at least one light source configured to excite the fluorophore-conjugated patterns. For example a first light source may be an excitation light source for the fluorophore-conjugated patterns. The second light source may be used to excite or pump another fluorophore. For example, another different fluorophore may be used to detect an organelle within the cell (e.g., cell nucleus). The light sources may include light emitting diodes (LEDs), laser diodes, or the like. The system includes an imaging device that is configured to capture fluorescent light emitted from the fluorophore-conjugated patterns. The imaging device may also be used to capture fluorescent light emitted from fluorescently labelled organelles such as the cell nuclei. The cell nuclei can be used to identify those fluorophore-conjugated patterns in which no cells adhere, one (1) cell adheres, or two (2) or more cells adhere. According to some embodiments, the fluorophore-conjugated patterns where no cells adhere are used as a control. In addition, in some aspects of the invention, the fluorophore-conjugated patterns where two or more cells adhere are discarded. However, in some embodiments, useful information may be obtained from fluorophore-conjugated patterns where two or more cells have adhered. Furthermore, immunofluorescence or other techniques may be used to introduce yet another fluorophore-conjugated molecule emitting fluorescent light at a third wavelength for the purpose of labeling and identifying, for example, surface markers on the cells and relating those to the information obtained from the imaged fluorophore-conjugated patterns.
In another embodiment of the invention, a system for assaying forces applied by cells includes an optically transparent substrate comprising a soft material having a Young's modulus within the range of about 3 kPa to about 100 kPa. The system includes an array of molecular patterns disposed on a surface of the optically transparent substrate, the molecular pattern comprising fluorophore-conjugated patterns adherent to cells. A second substrate containing a plurality of apertures therein is secured to the surface of the optically transparent substrate to form a plurality of wells wherein each well contains one or more molecular patterns therein (e.g., a subset of patterns can be contained within each well). For example, the second substrate could include 96 wells as is used in a conventional 96 well test plate (of course other number of wells could be used). The system includes at least one light source configured to excite the fluorophore-conjugated patterns. The excited fluorophore-conjugated patterns emit fluorescent light that is captured by an imaging device. A computing device is configured to receive images from the imaging device and measures a dimensional change of the fluorophore-conjugated patterns having cells disposed thereon. The dimensional change may include a contraction of the pattern (i.e., pattern gets smaller in some respect) or it may include a relaxation (i.e., pattern gets larger in some respect), or a skewing (i.e., pattern gets smaller or larger in a non-uniform manner).
In another aspect of the invention, a method of using the system described above includes the operations of loading the plurality of wells with cells so that at least some of the cells adhere to the fluorophore-conjugated patterns. In one embodiment, the array of wells can be used to analyze compounds or drugs for their ability to affect changes in protein targets, signaling pathways, the cellular membrane or cytoskeletal structures that impart force on the underlying patterned substrate. For example, some of the wells or each well is loaded with a different compound or drug and the plurality of wells are illuminated with the at least one light source simultaneously or in a well-by-well sequence in time. The fluorophore-conjugated patterns from the plurality of wells are imaged with the imaging device and a dimensional change of the fluorophore-conjugated patterns within the wells is measured. Certain cells or sub-populations of cells can be identified by a dimensional change that exhibits a certain characteristic. For example, the computer may identify those cells having a dimensional change above or below a threshold value or a dimensional change within a specific range.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of identifying the force phenotype of cells includes providing an optically transparent substrate comprising a soft material having a Young's modulus within the range of about 3 kPa to about 100 kPa. The optically transparent substrate has an array of molecular patterns disposed on a surface thereof, the molecular pattern comprising fluorophore-conjugated patterns adherent to cells. Cells are loaded onto the optically transparent substrate, wherein at least some of the molecular patterns have one or more cells adhered thereto. The fluorophore-conjugated patterns are illuminated and images are captured of fluorescent light emitted from the fluorophore-conjugated patterns with an imaging device. A dimensional change of the fluorophore-conjugated patterns is measured with a computing device that receives the images. The cells are then categorized or classified based at least in part on the measured dimensional change.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of forming a substrate having an array of fluorescent-conjugated molecular patterns includes providing an optically transparent substrate. A layer of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is formed on the optically transparent substrate having a Young's modulus within the range of about 3 kPa to about 100 kPa. Next, a photoresist is patterned on the layer of PDMS. Fluorescently-conjugated molecules are attached to the layer of PDMS patterned with the photoresist. The photoresist is then removed.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of forming a substrate having an array of fluorescent-conjugated molecular patterns includes preparing a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based stamp having a desired array of patterns. A plurality of fluorescently-conjugated molecules is attached to the array of patterns of the stamp. The stamp is pressed to transfer the molecular pattern onto a layer of dextran spun to achieve a thin layer on a flat substrate. A soft layer of PDMS is formed on the stamped dextran, where the PDMS layer has a Young's modulus within the range of about 3 kPa to about 100 kPa. The dextran layer is then sacrificed to release the soft layer of PDMS. The soft layer of PDMS is then mounted on an optically transparent substrate.
The layer 12 is soft enough such that the soft polymer material that forms the layer 12 can be deformed at least 1 μm by forces on the order of magnitude of those applied by cells 11, i.e., forces within the range of pN-nN. The height of this layer 12 of soft polymer material may vary but is generally less then around 20 μm in height. In one embodiment, the layer 12 of soft polymer material includes polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). More particularly, the layer 12 of PDMS has a Young's modulus within the range of about 3 kPa to about 100 kPa and more preferably within the range of about 3 kPa to about 20 kPa. The softness of the PDMS layer 12 may be tuned by using a high base to crosslinker ratio (e.g., within a range of around 70:1 to around 20:1).
As seen in
Still referring to
Referring back to
Stained cell nuclei may be counted by using two gates: (1) size, and (2) solidity. Larger sized objects must have high solidity to be considered a single nucleus. Smaller objects can have lower solidity (subject to a minimum threshold) and still be considered as having a single nucleus present. If the conditions are not satisfied, the object is rejected as having 2+ nuclei. The MATLAB software program and the functions “im2bw,” “bwareaopen,” “bwlabel,” and “regionprops” can be used to determine the size and solidity of objects as well as perform the necessary binary image operations. Initially, the image containing DAPI (or other nuclear stain) is turned into a binary image and small objects are removed. Next, the number of distinct objects is determined in the binary image. If there are 0 or 2+ objects, these are classified as such and the next pattern location is chosen. If there is what appears to be a single object, the area (A) and the solidity (S) are calculated. The Solidity (S) is defined as the fraction of area of the object to the area of the smallest convex polygon (P) encompassing the object (S=A/P). The appropriate threshold for the area (A) is established based on the cell type. Smaller objects are likely to be a single nucleus and will have a lower threshold for an acceptable S value while larger objects are more likely to be two or more overlapping nuclei and therefore will have a higher minimum S value to be deemed a single nucleus. After establishing the threshold cutoff for the S value, the measured S value is compared to the threshold value. If the measured S value is higher than the threshold or cutoff value then the object is considered a single nucleus. If the measured S value is below the threshold value it is considered 2+ nuclei.
Still referring to
As noted herein, the fluorophore-conjugated molecular patterns 16 may be patterned in an array on the layer 12. In particular, the location of each fluorophore-conjugated molecular pattern 16 can be identified so that contractile motion of any particular molecular pattern 16 can be associated with a particular cell 11 or cells 11 that may be adhered to that spot. In this regard, one or more landmarks may be provided on the layer 12 or optically transparent substrate 14 so that specific locations can be mapped. In one example, the molecular patterns 16 may be arrayed in rows and columns. For example, unit cells 18 may be arrayed in rows and columns in the layer 12. In one example that is described below in more detail, the molecular patterns 16 are contained within individual wells or chambers so that separate reaction areas are provided. These segregated wells or chambers can be used to test compounds or pharmaceutical compositions on cells 11 to investigate their ability to affect contractile movements or force generation, for example.
Still referring to
A description will be given of how the image processing software 36 processes the digital image frames obtained by the imaging device 26. Image frames may be saved with the .TIFF formal to preserve information for analysis or later viewing. The image frames may also optionally be saved in the compressed .PNG format. Of course, any valid image format (e.g., .jpg, .bmp, or the like can be used). After cells have been placed or otherwise incubated with the layer 12 and allowed to adhere to the molecular patterns 16, the array of patterns 16 is then imaged with the imaging device 26. The imaging device 26 may obtain fluorescent images of the molecular patterns 16 before, during, or after the cells 11 have undergone contractile movement or, conversely, relaxation. The dynamic range of the pixel intensities may be adjusted post-imaging using, for example, ImageJ so that the patterns 16 can be visualized.
The image processing software 36 identifies all instances of a given molecular pattern 16 in an image stack and determines how many cells (e.g., 0, 1, or 2+) are adhered to each pattern 16 based on images of those cells 11 with stained nuclei. A MATLAB script opens the image files and pairs the stained nuclei images (e.g., DAPI images) with the fluorescent images of the patterns 16 (e.g., FITC images). The image processing software 36 calculates characteristic pixel length(s) of a given pattern 16 for the cases of no cells adhered and one (1) cell adhered. The ‘FITC’ images may be linearly scaled up with, for example, the MATLAB function ‘imresize’ to improve resolution of these measurements. For those patterns with zero cells adhered thereto, the center of each pattern 16 may be determined using binary center-of-mass calculations. For those patterns 16 with one (1) cell adhered thereto, a series of binary dilation and erosion operations, followed by a binary center-of-mass calculation on patterns is performed. The erosion/dilation procedure is used to remove the potential asymmetry in the pattern 16 arising from cell-induced deformations that would otherwise impact the location of the center of mass. Patterns 16 with two or more nuclei are not analyzed. For each processed pattern 16 (those that are crosses or “X” shaped), the diagonal distance in pixels is measured between the calculated center and the bright edge of the pattern 16 in each direction as illustrated in
If a circular shaped pattern 16 is used, the MATLAB “imfindcircles” function can be used to locate circles falling within a certain radius range, and the center (x,y) and the radius (r, in pixels) for each circle can be stored. The same nuclei counting function as described above is used to determine the number of cells 11 on each pattern 16. The radii in pixels are converted to microns, and the differences between each of the radii of circle-patterns with 1 cell and the median of the radii of circle-patterns with 0 cells can then be plotted as a distribution as described above with respect to the non-circular pattern 16.
The image processing software 36 can take absolute measurements of patterns 16 if the dynamic analysis is used. Thus, the imaging processing software 36 is able to calculate dimensional changes of the molecular patterns 16 occurring in response to cytoskeletal changes in the cells 11. The dimensional changes can be monitored in real time for dynamic monitoring of cell-substrate interaction or dimensional changes can be measured using end-point analysis where forces applied on the layer 12 reach a steady-state.
The substrate 40 is adhered to the layer 12 and surface tension from the wetting solution ensures a quick and effective bond between the substrate and the layer 12. A roller applicator or the like may be used to apply uniform pressure to the substrate 40 and/or optically transparent substrate 14 holding the layer 12. This results in a water-tight seal. In an alternative embodiment, an adhesive or clamp (not shown) may be used to secure the substrate 40 to the layer 12. In this embodiment, the wells 44 are filled with solution to keep the layer 12 wet. Once cells 11 are ready to be seeded onto the patterns 16 within the wells 44, the wells 44 can be filled with media and incubated until the cell suspension is prepared and loaded into the wells 44.
Referring now to
The image processing software 36 cross-references the image of the fluorescent pattern 16 with that obtained of the same field of view with the DAPI image and identifies those patterns 16 that do not have any cells 11 adhered thereto by identifying the patterns 16 that do not have any fluorescent nuclei. These patterns 16 are then used as the controls. For example, similarly shaped patterns with no cells 11 thereon may have their respective dimensions measured and a baseline established that is representative of no deflection in the pattern 16. The imaging processing software 36 uses the DAPI channel (or other non-overlapping channels for other cytoplasmic dyes) to identify those patterns 16 with only a single cell 11 or multiple cells 11. In one preferred aspect of the invention, the patterns 16 with only a single cell 11 are used to measure contraction or relaxation of the layer 12 in response to corresponding cellular force application changes. These images are cropped and saved for each identified pattern 16 and stored in a directory for access in case of an execution error is suspected as well as for confirming potential sub-populations and/or outlier data. Images with two or more cells 11 are discarded but in some embodiments, these images may be used. Changes in the dimension of the patterns 16 holding a single cell 11 is calculated by measuring the terminal ends of each these patterns 16 and subtracting a mean or average made of these same patterns 16 with no cells adhered thereto. In some embodiments, each pattern 16 may be associated with multiple data points (e.g., crosses or X shapes may have four (4) data points). Alternatively, different data points from a single shape may be combined into an average or mean dimensional change.
The image processing software 36 can be used to measure dimensional changes along multiple different axes depending on the nature of the molecular pattern 16. For example, the pattern 16 may have a major and a minor axis that may be orthogonal to one another. In another embodiment, the pattern 16 may be circular shaped and the image processing software 36 may be used to fit the pattern 16 with a circle that can be used to measure the diameter or radius of portions of the pattern 16. In some instances, only a single dimension or axis is measured. In other embodiments, multiple axes are measured to determine contractility. Contractility in one dimension may be different from contractility in another dimension.
The image processing software 36 may run for end-point analysis of forces applied by cells 11 in steady-state and for dynamic monitoring of cell-substrate interaction. For end-point analysis, cells 11 of interest are seeded and cultured on the layer 12 for the needed period of time (˜6 hrs. for cells that interact with the patterns solely through focal adhesions or <1 hr. for phagocytic cells). To end the experiment, the cells 11 may be fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with DAPI, and the substrate is mounted onto a glass slide for ease of handling, and imaged at any time. For dynamic analysis, the layer 12 is securely mounted to the imaging device 26. After the desired field-of-view is selected, cells 11 are seeded on the layer 12 and time-lapse imaging is used to record the dynamics of the cell-substrate interaction. This modality is well suited for measuring individual cellular responses to exposures to drugs or gene modifications, contractility dynamics and force profiles for cardiac myocytes or other beating cells, and for other measurements of rates of force application where it may be useful in uncovering dynamics that are masked in end-point analysis data. Certain cell types, such as some phagocytic cells, however, are imaged “live” even for end-point analysis as it has been found that paraformaldehyde treatment induces relaxation in certain cell types.
As an alternative to the imaging device 26 described above, imaging and analysis may also be done using a wide-field smart-phone or tablet PC based fluorescence and/or dark-field based microscopic imaging devices. See e.g., Wei, Q. et al. Fluorescent Imaging of Single Nanoparticles and Viruses on a Smart Phone. ACS Nano 7, 9147-9155 (2013) or H. Zhu, et al., “Cost-effective and Compact Wide-field Fluorescent Imaging on a Cell-phone”, Lab on a Chip (2010) to enable use of the invention in the field, in resource poor settings, or simply at a lower cost. Fluorophore excitation can be achieved using light-emitting-diodes and/or laser diodes that are placed at an oblique angle with respect to the optical axis of the imaging design, which can assist with the rejection/filtering of the excitation beam. In this alternative embodiment, the fluorescent microscope 28 is omitted and the camera functionality of the mobile electronic device is used to capture the fluorescent images of the patterns 16.
In operation 130, the structure that includes the optically transparent substrate 14 and the PDMS layer 12 is treated with a pluronic solution (e.g., Pluronic F-127<1% wt/vol) for 40 minutes to prevent non-specific adsorption of cells 11 off of the adhesive patterns 16 which would complicate data analysis following imaging. In operation 135, cells 11 are seeded onto the PDMS layer 12 containing the molecular patterns 16.
To form the stamp 41 a photoresist master mold is fabricated, using software such as “L-Edit” to design a metal photomask with the desired patterns. Fabrication of the chrome photomask is outsourced. A positive photoresist such as SPR-220-7 (thick resist) is spin-coated onto a silicon wafer, soft baked, exposed through the metal (e.g., chrome) photomask, and developed until the master mold is ready. The mold is taped to a petri dish and 10:1 PDMS is poured over it and cured. The mold size ranges from ˜1 in2 (for small samples) to 9 in2 squares for the well-plate embodiment. The sizing is arbitrary and easily scalable.
Once the stamp 41 is cleaned or otherwise treated, the chosen adhesive molecule(s) are then inked onto the stamp 41 as seen in operation 155. For example, a protein solution is pipetted onto the stamp 41, allowed to wet the entire surface, and covered with a plastic sheet cut to size to help the solution spread over the full surface and prevent drying. This adsorption reaction happens for 30-60 minutes depending on the protein used.
Once the adhesive molecule(s) have adsorbed to stamp 41, the stamp 41 is dried with pressurized air. Once dry the stamp 41 is immediately used to stamp the dextran-coated silicon wafer 43 as seen in operation 160. Dextran is purchased (Sigma-Aldrich) as a powder typically at the 70 kDa-100 kDa sizes. A 20% mass-by-vol solution is prepared in deionized water in a test tube. The tube is mixed continuously (taped to a vortex mixer for example) for up to 30 minutes or until the dextran is fully dissolved. Silicon wafers are treated with plasma for 30 seconds to improve their hydrophilicity and the dextran solution is spin-coated onto the wafer to form a uniform sub-micron height coating. After spinning the dextran-coated wafers are baked at 150° C. for at least five (5) minutes to dry.
The stamping process includes rolling the stamp 41 with a cylindrical object along several directions to aid in transferring the adhesive and fluorescent molecules from the PDMS stamp 41 to the dextran-coated silicon wafer 43. After rolling, a set of glass slides can be used as a weight and applied on the stamp 41 and kept in place for several minutes. After transfer of the adhesive molecule(s) is complete, the weights can be removed and the stamp 41 is carefully removed from the dextran-coated wafer 43. Still referring to
The ultra-soft PDMS mixtures are prepared in 50 mL tubes (or other tapered, closed container for best mixing). Crosslinker is first weighed out, then the appropriate amount of base is added. Working ratios are generally 50:1 to 70:1 though this range may expand to, for example, 20:1 to 70:1 so the amount of crosslinker is very low, requiring one to use a closed container with preferably a tapered bottom that can be inverted and/or vortexed to promote optimal mixing. After inverting/vortexing for ˜3 minutes, the PDMS mixture is placed in vacuum to remove air bubbles (approximately 1 hr). Within about two (2) hours of mixing the PDMS, the PDMS is spin-coated on the dextran-coated wafers that have been stamped with protein or other molecule to form the pattern 16. The target height is about 10-15 microns. This height range is optimal for the well-plate format in terms of bonding the well-containing plate 40 with the layer 12.
After the soft-PDMS mix is spin-coated onto the stamped dextran-coated wafers, the wafers are left on a flat surface at room temp overnight to allow even distribution of the polymer (equal height), then placed into an oven (60-80° C.) and cured until ready. The crosslinker used to polymerize the PDMS also acts to crosslink the transferred adhesive molecule(s) and thus covalently incorporates the molecule(s) into the PDMS surface of the PDMS-dextran interface. Finally, as seen in operation 170, the dextran is sacrificed (i.e., dissolved away) in water (or other solvent with high dextran solubility) which releases the thin-film PDMS layer 12 that incorporates thereon the molecular patterns 16. A razor blade may be used to cut away a small amount of the periphery of the PDMS layer 12 from the wafer to expose the dextran to solution. After the periphery of the PDMS layer 12 is cut away a glass backing layer that forms the optically transparent substrate 14 is then contacted with the PDMS layer 12 and light pressure applied to ensure good contact between the glass and the PDMS layer 12. After the glass backing is added, the sample is submerged in PBS solution. An optional shaker may be used to hasten the dissolving of the dextran layer. The dextran layer quickly dissolves and the glass-backed PDMS layer 12 floats freely in solution. The PDMS layer 12 and glass substrate which forms the optically transparent substrate 14 is then carefully removed and inverted to be glass side down until it is ready to be sterilized with a strong base. The process of the thin-film PDMS layer 12 being transferred and mounted to the optically transparent substrate 14 is illustrated in operation 125. The process proceeds as previously described with the addition of a pluronic solution and seeding of cells 11.
The pattern transfer and incorporation method described in the context of
Cells 11 in a suspension, which can consist of cell lines brought into suspension by trypsinization or cell scraping, or cells naturally found in suspension in body fluids (e.g., blood, pleural fluid, urine, cerebral spinal fluid, etc.) are applied to the treated substrate and incubated for a period of time (between about 15 minutes to about 6 hours) to adhere to the adhesive micro-patterns 16 and begin to apply force or otherwise change the dimensions of the fluorescent pattern 16. The cells 11 may be monitored in a live state or they may be fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and imaged.
Experiments with Human Cells
The well-based embodiment described herein has been used to measured pattern contraction and force generation when screening primary human airway smooth muscle cells exposed to acetylcholine, enodthelin-1, and histamine, and shown relaxation of smooth muscle contraction with ML-7 and albuterol exposure. A 96 well plate implementation was used to for the high throughput screening of these compounds that modulate and or affect contractility of airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells.
Compatibility with Other Biological Studies
Broadly speaking, the system has applications in: (1) force phenotyping of cells (i.e., identifying cell sub-populations by unique adhesive and contractile phenotypes rather than immunofluorescence); (2) drug discovery relating to cell contractility, and (3) diagnostics of immune dysfunction or immune state. The implementation described above, for example, is useful for measuring inherent cell forces exerted through focal adhesions and provides a high-throughput method of phenotyping adherent mammalian cells based on the magnitudes of these forces. Specifically, this is a measure of how intrinsically contractile a given cell type is (i.e., its contractility). This assay is especially useful in tracking differentiation of stem cells and other progenitor cells, and may be helpful in identifying specific cell types within mixed populations. Other implementations of this system provide ways of assaying various other biological behaviors and responses to stimuli as noted below.
Ligand-mediated forces: The system can analyze the response of a given cell type to different surface-bound ligands. Since the system allows for any protein or other molecule to be patterned on an ultra-soft layer 12, a cell type can be screened against any number of ligands and the force-response can be measured in a well-defined manner. This may be used to create tissue-like structures or otherwise provide guidelines for tissue engineering.
Contractility changes in disease: The system can be used to effectively quantify the differences in contractility between cells harvested from healthy tissue or organs and those harvested from damaged or recovering tissues (scar tissue) or organs. For example, contractility of myofibroblast or cardiomyocytes taken from a heart after a myocardial infarction could be compared to their healthy counterparts. Drugs could then be screened that may restore healthy levels of contractility. Similarly, intestinal smooth muscle cells, uterine smooth muscle cells and mesangial cells from disease models which have abnormal contractility can be compared to healthy cells and drugs screened to restore healthy function (e.g., force level of contraction).
Immune function: The system can be used to assay the immune state of a given organism by measuring various immunological functions of leukocytes, e.g. phagocytic ability and contractile force of various phagocytes, and functions of lymphocytes, e.g. binding and contractile ability of T cells. This assay can be used to diagnose immune function in patients and/or organisms quickly and in a functional way.
Phagocyte function: By patterning known opsonins such as antibodies, complement proteins and other circulating proteins as well as apoptotic bodies, the different phagocytes comprising the immune system, e.g., monocytes, neutrophils, macrophages, among others can be tested for phagocytosing ability (quantifiable through analysis of pattern deformation and/or by measuring the amount of opsonins remaining after the phagocytes adhere and apply force to envelop the pattern). The forces applied are expected to vary as a function of leukocyte type, activation, and opsonin (yielding patterns that are disease specific, e.g., for applications in monitoring bacterial or viral infection, transplant rejection, or autoimmune conditions). Forces are expected to also scale with level of immune activity (e.g., immunosuppression vs. hyperactivity).
Lymphocyte function: The system can be used for comparing the applied forces and adherence of lymphocytes, such as T cells, taken from healthy patients to those taken from patients with autoimmune disease, e.g., chronic inflammatory disease. T cells taken from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus have been known to display stronger actin polymerization, as well as increased adhesion, both of which are behaviors that are measurable with this system.
Allergen assay: The system can be used to pattern a variety of common allergens and screen an individual's basophils and mast cells for an allergic response in the form of increased binding, and therefore pattern deformation, which would be expected if the cells were decorated with large numbers of allergen-specific IgE, which is characteristic of an allergy.
Strain due to formation of bio-structures: The system can be used to investigate and quantify the strain induced by the formation of various bio-structures such as multicellular bacterial biofilms as a function of structure size and duration of existence. Drugs could be screened that interfere with contractility of the biofilm or tissue-like structure (e.g., granuloma) which may be therapeutically useful to disrupt the biofilm or disaggregate the granuloma. Additionally, spores produced by certain bacteria have been shown to exert differential strain on substrates that depends on environmental conditions. See, e.g., Chen et al., O. Bacillus spores as building blocks for stimuli-responsive materials and nanogenerators. Nat Nano 9, 137-141 (2014). This system can be used to make simple and statistically significant comparisons of these responses against many environmental stimuli and assist in the development of spore-based stimuli-responsive materials.
Contractile force dependence on cell polarity: The system can be used to study the contractile forces cells apply to a substrate if constrained to highly asymmetric patterns, causing polarization, which could aide in investigating biological processes involving cell polarity such as differentiation, proliferation, and migration, all of which are critical for organism development and maintenance. Since dysregulation of cell polarity is implicated in developmental disorders as well as cancer, drugs can be screened that may help control cell polarizability.
Effects of electrical stimulation on contractility: It has been shown that certain cell types align and/or elongate in a direction perpendicular to the direction of an applied electric field. The system may be used to now study cell contractile responses to such external stimuli. These studies would be especially useful for quantifying the contractile forces of excitable cells (e.g., neural cells, cardiomyocytes, smooth muscle cells) as well as the rates at which they are applied and related characteristics (e.g., periodicity).
Role of genes in contractility: The system can be used in coordination with gene-silencing tools such as RNAi and CRISPR gene-editing technology to help identify which genes are most responsible for cell contractility and elucidate the pathways through which multiple genes work together to control contractility. Since cancer progression may rely on increased cell contractility, particularly for its role in migration and remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM), the system may be used to identify possible drug targets (e.g., proteins encoded by genes found to be implicated in contractility of malignant cells).
Unlike traction force microscopy and elastomeric micropost methods, which allow cells to adhere in uncontrolled, random and, therefore, irreproducible morphologies that make comparisons between experiments difficult, the system and method described herein precisely constrains cells to patterns designed by the user. Since the orientation, extent of spreading, and polarization of adhered cells may dictate their mechanical responses to stimuli, they are important variables that must be controlled for, and this is achieved with high reproducibility with the patterning methods described herein. The invention utilizes a novel approach for taking measurements of cell contractility by imaging and measuring the dimensions of the fluorescent patterns occupied by the cells rather than the cells themselves, which is the standard approach. Additionally, the new method we show of using a sacrificial dextran layer and molding the proteins within the elastomeric matrix leads to higher adhesive strength of the pattern to the elastomeric substrate compared to adsorption-based patterning, avoiding issues of cells pulling the pattern off the substrate when they contract. Furthermore, due to the well-defined target measurements, e.g., dimensions of patterns in pixels, custom-written automated software is used to parse through large volumes of data and measure the patterns with high accuracy (tested against manual pixel length measurements), leading to a high-throughput platform compared to other platforms that must image at higher magnification or before and after a treatment at each individual location.
The platform technology disclosed herein will have several potential markets. For example the approach can provide solutions to immune diagnostic problems (e.g., quickly diagnosing lupus, which is notoriously difficult to detect with current commercial diagnostic solutions), provide a drug screening platform for pharmaceutical testing, or serve as a research tool to characterize cell differentiation. Generally, cell contractility is important to several physiological processes (e.g., cardiac function, immune cell function, smooth muscle function in various organs) and its dysregulation is implicated in a variety of diseases. Current methods of quantifying cell contractility have limitations in objectivity of measurements, through-put, and normalization of test conditions (e.g., cell morphology and extent of cell-cell contact). Through the use of fluorescent adhesive molecules arranged in precise micro-patterns on the surfaces of highly flexible substrates, the invention provides a simple tool for making well-defined quantitative measurements of cell contractility while maintaining strict control over environmental conditions and cell orientation, spacing and spreading. As such, it presents a solution for screening agents that affect cell contractility and could be used discover drugs and genes that restore healthy levels of contractility.
While embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, various modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The invention, therefore, should not be limited, except to the following claims, and their equivalents.
This Application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/584,419, filed on Sep. 26, 2019, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,816,540, which itself is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/105,627, filed on Aug. 20, 2018, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,473,644, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/300,021, filed on Sep. 28, 2016, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,082,497, which is a U.S. National Stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2015/023136, filed Mar. 27, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/972,171 filed on Mar. 28, 2014, which are hereby incorporated by reference. Priority is claimed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 119, 120 or any other applicable statute.
This invention was made with Government support under Grant Number OD007113, awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20030032203 | Sabatini et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050264805 | Cromwell et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20110244116 | Badre et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120212824 | Sakurai | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130098442 | Ochiai et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140024041 | Tseng | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140024045 | Thery et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013074972 | May 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report for PCT/US2015/023136, Applicant: The Regents of the University of California, Form PCT/ISA/210 and 220, dated Jul. 13, 2015 (5pages). |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for PCT/US2015/023136, Applicant: The Regents of the University of California, Form PCT/ISA/237, dated Jul. 13, 2015 (11pages). |
Chen, Xi et al., Bacillus spores as building blocks for stimuli-responsive materials and nanogenerators, Nat Nano 9, 137-141 (2014). |
Fu, Jianping et al, Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates, Nature Methods, vol. 7, pp. 733-739, (2010). |
Sniadecki, Nathan J. et al., Microfabricated Silicone Elastomeric Post Arrays for Measuring Traction Forces of Adherent Cells, Methods in Cell Biology, vol. 83 (2007). |
Tseng, Qingzong et al., A new micropatterning method of soft substrates reveals that different tumorigenic signals can promote or reduce cell contraction levels, Lab Chip, 2011, 11, 2231-2240. |
Wei, Qingshan et al., Fluorescent Imaging of Single Nanoparticles and Viruses on a Smart Phone, ACS Nano 7, 10, 9147-9155 (2013). |
Zhu, Hongying et al., Cost-effective and compact wide-field fluorescent imaging on a cell-phone, Lab Chip, 2011, 11, 315-322. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) for PCT/US2015/023136, Applicant: The Regents of the University of California, Form PCT/IB/326 and 373, dated Oct. 13, 2016 (13pages). |
Liu, Kai et al., Improved-Throughput Traction Microscopy Based on Fluorescence Micropattern for Manual Microscopy, PLOS ONE, www.plosone.org, Aug. 2013, vol. 8, Issue 8, e70122 (11pages). |
Marinkovic, Aleksandar et al., Improved throughput traction microscopy reveals pivotal role for matrix stiffness in fibroblast contractility and TDF-B responsiveness, Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 303: L169-L180, 2012. First published Jun. 2012; doi:10.1152/ajplung.00108.2012. |
Munevar, Steven et al., Traction Force Microscopy of Migrating Normal and H-ras Transformed 3T3 Fibroblasts, Biophysical Journal, vol. 80, Apr. 2001, 1744-1757. |
Polio, Samuel R. et al., A micropatterning and image processing approach to simplify measurement of cellular traction forces, Acta Biomater. Jan. 2012; 8(1):82-88. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.013. |
Rape, Andrew D. et al., The regulation of traction force in relation to cell shape and focal adhesions, Biomaterials 32(2011)2043-2051. |
Tseng, Peter et al., Substrates with Patterned Extracellular Matrix and Subcellular Stiffness Gradients Reveal Local Biomechanical Responses, Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1242-1247. |
Wang, James H-C. et al., Cell traction force and measurement methods, Biomechan Model Mechanobiol (2007) 6:361-371. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210018491 A1 | Jan 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61972171 | Mar 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16584419 | Sep 2019 | US |
Child | 17033488 | US | |
Parent | 16105627 | Aug 2018 | US |
Child | 16584419 | US | |
Parent | 15300021 | US | |
Child | 16105627 | US |