The present invention relates to laser systems, and, in particular, relates to laser devices that project laser beams beyond the device that may be hazardous to user, viewers and others, and, in greater particularity, relates to laser projectors.
The presentation of full color images on a screen, for example, by a laser projector requires complex electronic and optical technology and, further presents significant safety issues.
One version of a light modulator projector uses scanning devices where multiple laser beams are very rapidly scanned on a screen to create an image. This is similar to the process of scanning an electron beam across a CRT, but has limitations due to the optical systems components such as the polygon scanner and the galvo mirror required to move the laser beams in the X-Y directions on the screen to illuminate each of the defined pixels on the screen. In order to increase the quality of the image, multi-beam scanning has been suggested and is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,351,324, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In order to produce sharp, clear and bright images with laser beams from projectors, intense laser beams are required which can injure eyes. In order to produce safe laser devices, precautions must be taken in the design of such devices. U.S. Pat. No. 5,665,942, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, discloses an optical-scanning system that reduces the effective power of the laser beam during the scanning process, monitors the laser's “sleeping” period for proper output, and further shut downs if certain devices such as the scanner motor or the scanner speed are not within defined ranges.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,913,603, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, discloses a laser eye surgery system where a fraction of the laser energy is taken from the laser beam for diagnostic testing, and if not within specifications, a computer unit will stop the laser beam. This safety system does not provide an independent assessment of the full laser beam and relies on computer analysis of the laser operation.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0007562, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, discloses a laser safety system for use in a laser projector where a galvo mirror is forced by means of magnets into a defined position to stop the output of the laser beam when there is a scanning failure. The laser beam is directed into a shielding unit to stop the output until the laser is turned off.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0024704, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, discloses the use of an angle sensor on the scanner and a control block unit to determine if there is a fault condition and then directs the laser beam into a protective sphere and blocks the output laser beam with mechanical shutters.
U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2005/0035943 and 2005/0128578, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, disclose the use of a laser safety system employing infrared detection, for example, to detect the presence of an object in the path of the laser beam between the projector and the screen, and then subsequently reduce the beam intensity to a safe level. These references fail to consider the laser beam being improperly directed or failing to operate as required.
Thus, there exists a need for a device that allows for the immediate termination of laser beams from image projectors upon the failure of the scanner or other devices within the system.
Accordingly, a laser system is provided such as an image projector using laser beams. Upon a fault condition, the laser beams are terminated to prevent possible damage to human eyes of the user and/or viewers of the image or other persons in the immediate area. The laser system, such as an image projector for example, outputs one or more laser beams that may be terminated upon a fault condition, such as the failure of the scanner, for example. The laser system includes a predetermined surface upon which the one or more laser beams interact upon the fault condition to terminate the output laser beams. Illustratively, the one or more laser beams may interact with the predetermined surface by ablating and/or melting the surface upon the fault condition to terminate the output laser beams.
The laser system produces one or more laser beams that are output from the laser system. The laser system includes means for terminating the output of the one or more laser beams from the laser system upon the occurrence of the one or more laser beams interacting with the predetermined surface to change a characteristic of the predetermined surface indicative of a fault condition, when the one or more laser beams may cause damage to a human eye. The predetermined surface upon interaction with the one or more laser beams may ablate and/or melt to indicate the fault condition. A sensor may further be located behind the predetermined surface to sense and indicate the fault condition upon ablation of the predetermined surface, in response to which a control signal may be sent to the laser source(s) for shut-down. The means for terminating may operate independent of the optical system for outputting the one or more laser beams.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to one skilled in the pertinent art from the following detailed description provided hereinafter, and accompanying drawings where:
It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating exemplary embodiments of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Referring to
An internal laser beam 122 being one or more of the scanned laser beams 116 within the x-y scanner 114 is used to determine if the lasers in the laser source 110 should be turned off, or the output beam(s) interrupted, until a cause of a fault condition generated in a fault detector 124 is repaired. The fault detector 124 continually outputs a fault signal 126 being either a 1 or a 0, for example, representing a “no fault” condition or a “fault” condition, respectively. Alternatively, only a control signal indicative of the fault condition may be output when fault is detected to turn off the laser source(s) 110. The electronics necessary for implementing this fault detector 126 and its operation are well known and may include switches and relays, for example, as describe in the above-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,351,324.
If the laser beam 204 slows or stops along the line 208, a sufficient amount of fluence of laser energy will interact with the surface 202 to cause a condition thereon which would indicate a fault condition such as a scanner failure. It is further an option if the scanning mirror 206 (which is part of the scanner 114 shown in
It is a further embodiment where the laser safety fuse is not an integral part of the optical train but still receives a scanned laser beam, for example, in a default position where the scanner stops if defective. In this embodiment, the predetermined surface need not be reflective as will be described hereinafter, but will detect the fault condition and send a control signal 126 to shut off the laser source(s) 110 shown in
The fault detector devices shown in
Further, the input beam on the predetermined surface is not necessarily the same diameter as the laser beam passing through the scanner because optical elements may be added to focus more sharply the laser beams on the predetermined surfaces to be disclosed. See
If there are deficiencies in either the scanner 410 or galvo mirror 206, the representative laser beam will be positioned in a default position at the end of the scan line or in another predetermined position until the problem is repaired. Once the representative laser beam is positioned at the default position, e.g., when scanning stops or fails to perform as desired, a control signal form the fault detector will shut off the laser sources. This safety feature of shutting off the laser sources may be in lieu of or in addition to preventing reflections from the safety coating 214 upon melting thereof for example, thus preventing exit of laser beams out of the window 414. Of course, instead of using representative beams and non-reflective fault detectors, the fault detectors may be reflective and situated in the output path to receive the actual beams (instead of the representative beams) for reflection output from the laser projector during proper operation.
The fault detector devices shown in
Referring to
Such melting will cause an electrical short between the ends of the conductors 506 and will cause the laser source to terminate the lasers, e.g., via issuance of a control signal as is well known to one skilled in the electrical art. Of course in the case the safety coating is reflective and the safety device is situated in the path of the output beams, the laser sources need not be turned off and yet safety is still ensured, since once the reflective safety coating ablate and/or melt, the laser beams cannot exit the window 414 (
Referring to
As seen in the above embodiments, a laser safety fuse is provided that will immediately result in the termination of the lasers or termination of the output beams thus preventing such output beams from leaving the laser projector. The laser safety fuses provide an independent means to terminate the lasers and/or output beams upon any conditions that cause the laser scanners to be positioned in a default position. This will insure that the laser beams do not exit from the projector in any form to damage eyes of viewers for example.
Finally, the above-discussion is intended to be merely illustrative of the present invention and should not be construed as limiting the appended claims to any particular embodiment or group of embodiments. Thus, while the present invention has been described in particular detail with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof, it should also be appreciated that numerous modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader and intended spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the claims that follow. The specification and drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative manner and are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims.
In interpreting the appended claims, it should be understood that:
a) the word “comprising” does not exclude the presence of other elements or acts than those listed in a given claim;
b) the word “a” or “an” preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements;
c) any reference signs in the claims do not limit their scope;
d) several “means” may be represented by the same item or hardware or software implemented structure or function; and
e) each of the disclosed elements may be comprised of hardware portions (e.g., discrete electronic circuitry), software portions (e.g., computer programming), or any combination thereof.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB06/54706 | 12/8/2006 | WO | 00 | 6/13/2008 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60749804 | Dec 2005 | US |