This application claims benefit of the following patent application(s) which is/are hereby incorporated by reference: None
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The present invention generally relates to DC motor control devices and methods. More particularly, the present invention pertains to devices and methods for controlling a DC motor in which motor speed is calculated using motor field flux and armature voltage parameters.
Conventional DC motor controllers are often used to control the speed and torque of the motor under various operation conditions. Typically this requires the use of a control loop that depends on an accurate determination of motor speed. In many DC motor controllers, motor speed is calculated using measurements of the motor field flux and armature voltage.
Although it is easy to measure the armature voltage in an operating DC motor, motor field flux cannot easily be measured directly. Consequently, many conventional motor control systems approximate the motor field flux by measuring the field current and then applying that current measurement to a pre-determined field current vs. flux curve. However, if the flux parameter that is approximated by the control system does not match the actual motor field flux, motor velocity oscillations occur. This mismatch between calculated and actual flux can arise in a conventional control system because the field current to flux curve is unique for each motor, varying according to time, motor size, and manufacturer. These unwanted motor velocity oscillations often occur under light motor loads when it is desirable to operate the motor under a weakened field. A field is weakened to conserve energy, prolong motor life, and operate above base speed. If the motor cannot maintain a consistent velocity under weakened field conditions, the end user will not be able to take advantage of the field weakening features.
What is needed, then, is a device and method that provides a more stable control of the speed of a DC motor by closely matching a calculated motor flux to the actual field flux in the motor.
The present invention minimizes velocity oscillations that occur when DC motor speed is calculated using motor field flux and armature voltage. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a flexible flux curve is implemented in the motor control device that is intended to be tuned for each motor in the field. The flux curve is calculated using three user-defined points at 25%, 75% and 200% of rated motor field current. Those three points are used to calculate two flux curve lines. One flux curve line is positioned between 25% and 75% of rated motor field current. The second flux curve line is positioned between 75% and 200% of rated motor field current. Two flux curve lines are used because a typical motor field flux curve exhibits a “knee” at the field saturation point. To make the curve more flexible and to more closely approximate the motor's actual flux curve, the 75% field current can be varied by the user.
The present invention allows for more accurate calculations of DC motor speed and torque, while accounting for each motor's unique performance characteristics.
Thus, the present invention uses a flux curve that is flexibly adapted (tuned) for each motor in the field. This flux curve is constructed from user-defined points at different rated field currents (e.g., 25%, 75%, and 200%). These points are then used to calculate two flux curve lines, one between the two lower rated currents and one between the two upper rated currents. This allows the motor control system to perform a more accurate calculation of motor speed and torque, using characteristics of the actual motor being controlled.
Referring first to
As shown on
As also shown on
In one embodiment, the logic unit in control module 15 of
Exemplary parameters (D00-D23) used by one embodiment of the invention are summarized in Table 1 below which includes the parameter name/type, the default parameter setting, the parameter operational range, and the unit of measurement.
With particular reference to the present invention, the operational parameters used by the control module 15 include DC motor parameters D00-D06, including field current and armature voltage. Four parameters, D20-D23, are used to select a flux-field current curve that calculates motor speed and torque. Each DC motor has a unique flux-field current curve that represents a functional relationship between field current and field flux in the motor. Deviations from that curve can cause velocity oscillations. To minimize these oscillations a flux-field curve is enabled in the control module 15 via parameter D20 and modified using parameters D21-D23. The flux-field curve is calculated based on separate first and second flux curve lines using the basic formula y=m×+b. In one embodiment, the flux curve is calculated using three user-defined points at 25%, 75% and 200% of rated motor field current.
The first flux curve line is positioned between 25% of rated motor field current and 75% of rated field current. The second flux curve line is positioned between 75% of rated field current and 200% of rated field current. As parameters D21-D23 are changed, so are the slopes and y-intercepts of the two flux curve lines. One example of a flux-field current curve calculated using default values is shown in
In the embodiment of
In some embodiments, an inverse flux curve is calculated once because of limitations in computer mathematical execution times. For example, division operations in a computer can slow down processing time. Therefore, in some embodiments, the control method calculate the inverse of flux tables once and uses the inverse table to multiply when operating through the device speed loop. As can be seen from
Motor velocity oscillations are most common above base motor speed in many DC mill motors. Preferably, tuning of the flux-field current curve should occur at five or six speed references between 120% and 170% of motor base speed to provide smooth motor acceleration. This can be important if the minimum field is set below 50.0%.
To initiate tuning of the flux-field curve in the embodiment of
After parameter D22 is selected to provide the minimum velocity oscillation, the minimum field current is set to 25% of rated. Parameter D21 is then adjusted as described for parameter D22. After the motor velocity oscillations have been minimized at 25% field current, the operator should verify that oscillations do not occur at various speeds above the motor base speed.
In some embodiment, parameter D23 may be least critical above motor base speed, but it can be used to increase the accuracy of speed regulation during for heavy motor loading, e.g., at field currents greater than 50.0% of rated. Preferably, parameters D21-D23 should not need to be adjusted by more than 20% from their default value.
Thus, although there have been described particular embodiments of the present invention of a new and useful device and method for measuring and controlling the speed and torque of a DC motor, it is not intended that such references be construed as limitations upon the scope of this invention except as set forth in the following claims.
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the reproduction of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4281276 | Cutler et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4450398 | Bose | May 1984 | A |
4804067 | Kahkipuro | Feb 1989 | A |
4821276 | Alphonse et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4845418 | Conner | Jul 1989 | A |
5530343 | Bowers, III et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
6087796 | Canada et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6184648 | Kato et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6407531 | Walters et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6586914 | Garrigan et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6859018 | Garrigan et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6870350 | Garrigan et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7830106 | Fukuchi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20030094917 | Garrigan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030197490 | Garrigan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205989 | Garrigan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20060055363 | Patel et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070267990 | Abolhassani et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080030163 | Fukuchi et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048607 | Kono | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090295316 | Patel et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100090629 | Tang | Apr 2010 | A1 |