The invention relates to a new measuring device and to a process, as well as to its application as a level control in vessels with liquid-gas mixtures. It is conceivable that the invention can also be used in steam drums and generally in separators for two-phase mixtures, as well as in evaporators.
From prior art level gauges are known which are executed as standpipes arranged on the side of the respective vessels and equipped with sight glasses to observe the fluid levels in the vessels. The standpipes each have an upper and a lower level gauge connection, which are both connected with the internal chambers of the vessels in a fluid-conducting manner. The lower level gauge connections are installed close to the bottom of the vessels and the upper level gauge connections are positioned considerably higher than the desired set points for the fluid levels.
Measurement is carried out on the principle of “communicating pipes”. The fluid standpipe displays the same level status as is demonstrated in the vessel as long as the liquid in the fluid standpipe and the liquid in the vessel have the same density rho. In the case of pure liquids this basic prerequisite for the liquid in the vessel and the liquid in the measuring pipe to have the same rho value is met with a good degree of accuracy and the measuring principle described can be applied without any difficulty.
However, in liquid-gas mixtures in a vessel, the density is dependent upon the amount of gas contained in the liquid. This means that the above-mentioned requirement is not always met when it comes to level measurements for vessels with two-phase mixtures because the two-phase mixture separates in the standpipe and the pure liquid has a corresponding higher density. Consequently there is a degree of uncertainty associated with this measurement. There are indeed operating conditions in which the rho of the liquid in the vessel is only half as great as the rho in the fluid standpipe. With evaporators the quantity of rising gas bubbles and, consequently, the reduction in the effective density is a function of the evaporator load; there is, therefore, no constant deviation in the specific weight between the two-phase mixture and the liquid. This means that the effective pressure on the lower level gauge connections is dependent upon the effective density of the medium in the evaporator chamber. This density is, however, reduced by the vapour bubble concentration of the evaporating medium to an extent which cannot be directly determined from outside.
Therefore, with evaporators the extent to which the effective density of the medium in the evaporator chambers is reduced fundamentally depends on the amount of liquid evaporating, i.e. on the evaporator load. For this reason it is possible that the fill level in the evaporator chamber will rise up to the droplet separator although the fill level displayed suggests that the fill level is normal.
A optimal fill level is reached in evaporators when all heat exchanger tubes are covered with liquid and the evaporator can perform at full capacity. A higher fill level is neither necessary nor desirable as there is a risk that fluid will also leave the vessel with the gas. This, in turn, can lead to damage to the downstream machines.
In general this problem, which is demonstrated here using the example of an evaporator, is also known to occur in all other vessels with two-phase mixtures, such as steam drums. In this case, the aim generally is to have a set point at around the central filling level of the vessel to ensure that the separation into gas and liquid phases is as clean as possible.
As a rule it is undesirable when liquid from this type of vessel is entrained with the gas phase, as impurities, such as salts, can be discharged with it. This can lead to corrosion and erosion in the downstream plant sections. In plants with evaporators immediately downstream, as is the case in refrigerating plants in ammonia plants, for example, this can also lead to damage to the impellers.
From this it follows that the described measuring principle has limited application when two-phase mixtures occur. In this case, it is irrelevant whether a local optical display is employed, or a remote display using an electrical pressure sensor.
If one relies on the display in the measuring tube despite the described measuring inaccuracy, then operating this type of control loop to control the fill level of a vessel with a liquid-gas mixture requires a lot of experience and sensitivity. It is not possible to make an optimum adjustment to the fill level in the vessel to suit all conceivable load conditions.
This means that, depending on the construction and application or operation of the vessel, the optimum operating level is known, but the problem of how to measure this accurately still remains to be solved.
Therefore, the objective of the invention is to provide a measuring device, a process to operate this measuring device, as well as applications for this measuring device which, at a certain set point of the fill level in the vessel, make it possible to guarantee that the fluid level in the vessel does not rise to a level where liquid is discharged out of the vessel along with the gas phase.
This is achieved by means of a new measuring device for controlling the fill level of a liquid-gas mixture using a liquid feed valve in a vessel, comprising at least one vertical fluid standpipe which is installed on the side external wall of the vessel and which is connected in a fluid-bearing manner with the internal chamber of the vessel via horizontal, tube-like, hydraulic devices, wherein
In so doing, the expression “at the height of the set point of the fill level in the vessel” means installing the third tube-like hydraulic device which protrudes into the vessel horizontally, and which corresponds directly to the set point measured at the centre point of the tube-like hydraulic device.
Installing this third hydraulic device below the set point guarantees that, upon reaching the set point in the vessel, in addition to the fluid level in the fluid standpipe being displayed, the corresponding value will also be displayed in the fluid standpipe. In a preferred embodiment of the invention the third tube-like hydraulic device, which protrudes into the vessel horizontally, measured at the centre point of the diameter of the hydraulic device, is installed at 1 to 25% in relation to the set point, with preference being given to 1 to 15%, and particular preference being given to 8 to 12% below the set point.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention the vessel is an evaporator wherein the set point of the fill level in the evaporator is achieved by means of complete coverage of the heating unit contained in the evaporator. In so doing the heating units in the evaporator comprise at least one heat exchanger tube. The liquid can, for example, be any cooling liquid known from prior art.
In a further embodiment of the invention the vessel is a steam drum, wherein the set point of the fill level in the steam drum is achieved at a central fill level, wherein deviations of 0-20%, with preference given to 0-10%, and particular preference given to 0-5% of the central fluid level in the steam drum are permitted.
The reflux-flow-throttling embodiment of the first hydraulic device preferably comprises one of the methods: Profile-restricting devices and/or valves and/or reflux throttles.
It is advantageous for the tube-like hydraulic devices to be selected from the nozzles and tubes group.
It is advisable for the display and control device to be fitted with sensors and/or probes.
The corresponding process for controlling the fill level of a liquid-gas mixture in a vessel by means of the measuring device described comprises the following process steps:
In a further embodiment of the process a liquid is fed into the vessel, which is an evaporator, and this liquid is heated in the evaporator via heating units and is discharged from the evaporator as gas.
In a further possible embodiment of the invention a liquid, which is enriched with gas bubbles, is fed into the vessel, which is a steam drum, and this liquid is separated from the gas bubbles in the steam drum, and gas and liquid are discharged from the steam drum in separate streams.
A preferred application sees the measuring device used for controlling the fill level in cold evaporators with two-phase mixtures. This application is particularly advantageous for ammonia plants. It can also be used in hot evaporators.
A further possible application is to use the measuring device to control the fill level in steam drums in which a water/steam mixture is separated.
The following diagrams are used to describe the different design variants of the invention in more detail:
Should the liquid contain gas bubbles, the displayed liquid level 6 in the fluid standpipe 7 subsequently has an error which occurs a result of the effective static pressure 9 on the first lower level gauge connection 5 being dependent upon the effective density of the medium in the inside of the vessel. This density is reduced by the gas bubble concentration of the liquid in the vessel. In a measuring device according to prior art gas and liquid separate in the outer fluid standpipe 7, the gas is discharged via the second upper level gauge connection 13 which is provided above the set point 10 in the vessel 1, and the liquid column 6 only comprises liquid with the corresponding higher density. As there is pressure equilibrium in the lower level gauge connection 5, the height of the liquid column 6 is, in principle, lower than in the vessel.
For this reason it is possible for the actual value 11 of the liquid height in the inside of the vessel to already be higher than the liquid column 6 in the fluid standpipe. If yd is the mean steam content of the liquid in the vessel, the formula
F
h=(hb−hm)/hb=1−hb/hm=yd
for the relative error of the conventional measuring device can be derived from the equilibrium of the hydrostatic pressures in the lower level gauge connection 5 The error is fundamentally dependent upon the volumetric gas content of the liquid and is largely constant across the entire measurement range. In the formula hb represents the actual level (8) of the liquid level in the vessel and hm represents the measured value (6) in accordance with
For this reason it is very difficult to maintain a desired set point 10 for a two-phase mixture in the inside of the vessel by means of the measuring device 4 and to prevent liquid from being discharged from the vessel 1 via a gas discharge nozzle 12.
Late identification of the actual liquid level in the vessel 1 is very disadvantageous as it can eventually lead to liquid being discharged via the gas phase which is discharged from the vessel 1 via the gas discharge nozzle 12.
In
Should the liquid contain gas bubbles, the displayed liquid level in the fluid standpipe 7 has the same error as that represented in the description in
However, as the set point for this operating point has not yet been fully achieved, the feed valve 3 remains open, and the liquid column 17 in the fluid standpipe 7 continues to rise. Gas escaping from the liquid in the fluid standpipe 7 leaves the fluid standpipe 7 via the second upper level gauge connection 13 which is provided above the set point 10 in the vessel 1. Upon the set point being reached the liquid is stopped from being fed into the vessel 1 by means of a signal being sent via sensors to the controllable liquid feed valve 3, and the liquid feed valve 3 is closed.
Should the liquid in the vessel 1 continue to rise, this liquid flows via the upper level gauge connection 13 into the fluid standpipe 7, wherein the liquid column 17 in the fluid standpipe 7 is filled up further and an excess value is displayed. Upon the excess value being reached a new signal is sent to the controllable liquid feed valve 3 via sensors, wherein the liquid feed valve 3 then closes and consequently no further liquid can get into the vessel 1.
Only when the set point 10 has been exceeded is a new signal transmitted to the liquid feed valve 3 which causes the liquid feed valve 3 to open again and liquid to stream back into the vessel 1 again.
The measurement error to be expected of the device according to the invention is described in detail below using
hm<H
to
h
b
=h
m
*[1+H/hm*(1−yd)2*(KVS,D2/KVS,D1)2]/[(1−yd)+(1−yd)2*(KVS,D2/KVS,D1)2]
and the relative error between actual value and measured value 6
F
u=(hb−hm)/hb=1−hm/hb
F
u1−[(1−yd)+(1−yd)2*(,KVS,D2/KVS,D1)2]/[1+H/hm*(1−yd)2*(KVS,D2/KVS,D1)2]
as well as for the case
hm≧H
the correlation between the actual liquid level in the vessel hb and the displayed measured value hm to
h
b
=h
m
*
[y
d
*H/h
m+(1−yd)+(1−yd)2*(KVS,D2/KVS,D1)2]/[(1−yd)+(1−yd)2*(KVS,D2/KVS,D1)2]
and the relative error between actual value and measured value to
F
o=[(1−yd)+(1−yd)2*(KVS,D2/KVS,D1)2][yd*H/hm+(1−yd)+(1−yd)2*(KVS,D2/KVS,D1)2]
When changing the cold evaporator 23 operation from full load to light load, the conditions are such that when the cold evaporator 23 is in light-load operation there are fewer gas bubbles in the liquid as less liquid evaporates. Thus the volume of the two-phase mixture is reduced by this amount. The consequence of this is that the fill level in the cold evaporator 23 drops sharply. The control process described in
If the cold evaporator 23 should undergo a converse load shift from light-load operation to full-load operation, there is a risk that the cold evaporator 23 could overflow if there is a spontaneous change. The reason for this lies in the fact that the fill level in the cold evaporator 23 is located at the optimum point for a light-load operation, in which liquid cooling agent, as described above, is readjusted as a result of the low level of gas bubbles arising. If the gas bubble concentration spontaneously increases due to the cold evaporator 23 suddenly going into full-load operation, the volume of the fill level in the cold evaporator 23 also increases. This means that the gradient of the load change may not exceed the chamber volume of the cold evaporator 23. If this requirement is met, the fill level which is too high will be reduced by means of evaporation, whilst the controllable feed valve 3 remains closed until the optimum fill level, i.e. the set point 10, is reached again and the measuring device resumes its regular operation as described in
The advantages arising from the invention are as follows:
1 Vessel
2 Feed line
3 Controllable fluid feed valve
4 Measuring device according to prior art
5 First lower level gauge connection
6 Liquid column
7 Liquid standpipe
8 Stoppage value
9 Static pressure
10 Set point
11 Actual value
12 Gas discharge nozzle
13 Second upper level gauge connection
14 Additional gauge connection
15 Measuring device according to the invention
16 Reflux flow throttle
17 Liquid column
18 Heat exchanger tubes
19 Pipeline
20 Evaporator
21 Liquid cooling agent
22 Liquid cooling agent
23 Cold evaporator
24 Water-steam mixture
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 008 843.9 | Feb 2010 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP11/00753 | 2/17/2011 | WO | 00 | 10/16/2012 |