1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to medical devices and methods useful for human mitral valve function repair and/or reconstruction. In particular, the present invention relates to a medical device that can be used to treat mitral valve regurgitation by replacing the function of native heart valves.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The human heart has four chambers and four valves. The heart valves control the direction of blood flow. Fully-functional heart valves ensure proper blood circulation is maintained during cardiac cycle. Heart valve regurgitation, or leakage, occurs when the leaflets of the heart valve fail to come fully into contact (coapt) due to disease, such as congenital, torn chordae tendineae, lengthened chordae tendineae, enlarged left ventricle, damaged papillary muscles, damaged valve structures by infections, degenerative processes, calcification of the leaflets, stretching of the annulus, increased distance between the papillary muscles, etc. Regardless of the cause, the regurgitation interferes with heart function since it allows blood to flow back through the valve in the wrong direction. Depending on the degree of regurgitation, this backflow can become a self-destructive influence on not only the function, but also on the cardiac geometry. Alternatively, abnormal cardiac geometry can also be a cause of regurgitation, and the two processes may “cooperate” to accelerate abnormal cardiac function. The direct consequence of the heart regurgitation is the reduction of forward cardiac output. Depending on the severity of the leakage, the effectiveness of the heart to pump adequate blood flow into other parts of the body can be compromised.
The mitral valve is a dual-flap (bi-leaflet) valve in the heart that lies between the left atrium (LA) and the left ventricle (LV). During diastole, a normally-functioning mitral valve opens as a result of increased pressure from the left atrium as it fills with blood (preloading). As atrial pressure increases above that of the left ventricle, the mitral valve opens, facilitating the passive flow of blood into the left ventricle. Diastole ends with atrial contraction, which ejects the remainder of blood that is transferred from the left atrium to the left ventricle. The mitral valve closes at the end of atrial contraction to prevent a reversal of blood flow from left ventricle to left atrium. The human mitral valve is typically 4-6 cm2 in opening area. There are two leaflets, the anterior leaflet and posterior leaflet, which cover the opening of the mitral valve. The opening of the mitral valve is surrounded by a fibrous ring called the mitral valve annulus. The two leaflets are attached circumferentially to the mitral valve annulus and can open and close by hinging from the annulus during cardiac cycle. In a normally-functioning mitral valve, the leaflets are connected to the papillary muscles in the left ventricle by chordae tendineae. When the left ventricle contracts, the intraventricular pressure forces the mitral valve to close, while chordae tendineae keep the two leaflets coapting (to prevent two valve leaflets from prolapsing into the left atrium and creating mitral regurgitation) and prevent the valve from opening in the wrong direction (thereby preventing blood from flowing back into the left atrium).
Currently, the standard heart valve regurgitation treatment options include surgical repair/treatment and endovascular clipping. The standard surgical repair or replacement procedure requires open-heart surgery, use of cardio-pulmonary bypass, and stoppage of the heart. Because of the invasive nature of the surgical procedure, risks of death, stroke, bleeding, respiratory problems, renal problems, and other complications are significant enough to exclude many patients from surgical treatment.
In recent years, endovascular clipping techniques have been developed by several device companies. In this approach, an implantable clip made from biocompatible materials is inserted into the heart valve between the two leaflets to clip the middle portion of the two leaflets (mainly A2 and P2 lealfets) together to prevent the prolapse of the leaflets. However, some shortcomings, such as difficulty of positioning, difficulty of removal once implanted incorrectly, recurrence of heart valve regurgitation, the need for multiple clips in one procedure, strict patient selection, etc., have been uncovered in the practical application of endovascular clipping.
In conclusion, there is a great need for developing a novel medical device to treat mitral regurgitation. None of the existing medical devices to date address this need fully. The present invention aims to provide physicians with a device and a method which can avoid a traumatic surgical procedure, and instead provide a medical device that can be implanted through a catheter-based, less invasive procedure for mitral regurgitation treatment.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a mitral valve replacement device that can be effectively secured to the location of the human mitral valve annulus without piercing of the native tissue.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a method of deploying a mitral valve replacement device at the location of the human mitral valve annulus where the position of the device can be adjusted before final release of the device is completed.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a novel leaflet structure that provides more efficient valvular control and flow.
In order to accomplish the objects of the present invention, the present invention provides a mitral valve replacement device adapted to be deployed at a mitral valve position in a human heart. The device has an atrial flange defining an atrial end of the device, a ventricular portion defining a ventricular end of the device, the ventricular portion having a height ranging between 2 mm to 15 mm, and an annulus support that is positioned between the atrial flange and the ventricular portion. The annulus support includes a ring of anchors extending radially therefrom, with an annular clipping space defined between the atrial flange and the ring of anchors. A plurality of leaflet holders positioned at the atrial end of the atrial flange, and a plurality of valve leaflets secured to the leaflet holders, and positioned inside the atrial flange at a location above the native annulus.
The following detailed description is of the best presently contemplated modes of carrying out the invention. This description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of illustrating general principles of embodiments of the invention. The scope of the invention is best defined by the appended claims.
The subject technology relates generally to mitral regurgitation treatment devices and to the manner of positioning and anchoring the device in a human heart. This device contains an atrial portion and a ventricular portion. The atrial portion of the device “seats” at the mitral annulus area to create a “seal” to prevent leakage (blood flow back from the left ventricle to the left atrium) from the area surrounding the device. The ventricular portion of the device contains a valve body and anchoring features. The anchoring features can be partially or fully covered by fabric or tissue to create a “seal” to prevent leakage. The valve body contains the tissue leaflet(s) and leaflet supporting structure. During normal cardiac cycle, the valve and leaflet(s) open and close to regulate the direction and volume of the blood flow between the left atrium and the left ventricle. The function of the anchoring features is to maintain the proper position of the device to prevent potential migration during cardiac cycle. The anchoring features provide an anchoring effect by interacting with the native leaflet(s), and/or the annulus, and/or other subvalvular structures. One design of the anchoring feature is to use biocompatible adhesive/glue to form the bond between the device and the native valvular and/or heart structure to maintain the position of the valve prosthesis.
In use, the device will be delivered using a transcatheter approach to the mitral space, and interact with the internal valvular structure and subvalvular structures to restore the function of the mitral valve. In addition, this device can be implanted through surgical or other minimally invasive procedures. The device can be implanted inside of a heart or a lumen in the human vasculature, which serves to improve, replace, and/or reconstruct the function of the native mitral leaflet(s) and mitral valve.
The present invention also covers an anchoring feature (clip design) that utilizes the native leaflet(s), and/or annulus, and/or other sub-annular structures to provide an anchoring effect to maintain the device in position during the cardiac cycle. Once the device is placed in the mitral position, the anchoring feature(s) on the device engage/interacts with the native leaflet(s), and/or annulus, and/or other subvalvular structures to prevent the device from migration during cardiac cycle. The atrial portion of the device can also provide some additional anchoring effect by interacting with the annulus and the atrial portion of the heart above the annulus that is in contact with the atrial portion of the device.
The present invention also provides a novel leaflet design. The leaflet configuration can contain one to six pieces of leaflets, which can be sewn together inside the leaflet supporting structure to form an umbrella shaped profile that can open and close during the cardiac cycle to regulate the flow. During cardiac systole (heart contraction), the umbrella-shaped leaflets can open to a larger profile and to close the mitral valve, so that there is no blood flow back to the left atrium from the left ventricle. During cardiac diastole (heart relaxation), the umbrella-shaped leaflets can close to a smaller profile and to open the mitral valve, so that blood can flow from the left atrium to the left ventricle. The advantages of this novel valve leaflet design include: (i) no axial contraction/squeezing to the leaflet supporting structure by the leaflet(s) during the cardiac cycle, so as to improve the fatigue resistance of the supporting structure; (ii) better leaflet(s) coaptation, where the coaptation is between the leaflet(s) and the skirt(s) on the supporting structure, which minimizes the potential for central leakage, and (iii) there is no “free edge” at the central portion of the leaflet(s). There is no coaptation between/among the leaflet(s). This feature is important because any deformation or distortion of the valve supporting structure would result in minimal central leakage.
The mitral valve replacement device of the present invention can be compacted into a low profile and loaded onto a delivery system, and then delivered to the target location by a non-invasive medical procedure, such as through the use of a delivery catheter through transapical, or transfemoral, or transseptal procedures. The mitral valve replacement device can be released from the delivery system once it reaches the target implant site, and can expand to its normal (expanded) profile either by inflation of a balloon (for a balloon expandable supporting structure) or by elastic energy stored in the device (for a device with a self-expandable supporting structure).
The leaflet(s) in the mitral valve replacement device of the present invention can be made from treated animal tissue/pericardium, from thin wall biocompatible metallic element (such as stainless steel, Co—Cr based alloy, Nitinol, Ta, and Ti etc.), or from biocompatible polymer material (such as polyisoprene, polybutadiene and their co-polymers, neoprene and nitrile rubbers, polyurethane elastomers, silicone rubbers, fluoroelastomers and fluorosolicone rubbers, polyesters, and ptfe, etc.). The leaflets can also be provided with a drug or bioagent coating to improve performance, prevent thrombus formation and promote endotheliolization. The leaflet(s) on the mitral device can also be treated or be provided with a surface layer/coating to prevent calcification. The cover on the valve body and the leaflet supporting structure can also be a combined layer from fabric and tissue, if desired. For example, the upper portion of the cover can be made from fabric, while the lower portion can be made from tissue, or vice versa. The atrial portion of the device and the body of the leaflet supporting structure can be either fully or partially covered by fabric or tissue to provide improved sealing effect and healing effect. The anchoring feature(s) built on the device can be fully or partially covered by fabric or tissue to promote tissue growth, to prevent Perivalunaer leakage (PVL), and to reduce the potential damage to the surrounding internal heart structure.
The leaflet(s) can be integrated into the leaflet supporting structure by mechanical interweaving, suture sewing, and chemical, physical, or adhesive bonding methods. The leaflet(s) can also be formed from the elements of the supporting structure. For example, the leaflet supporting structure and leaflet(s) can be directly molded and formed together from polymer or metal material. The leaflet(s) can also be formed by vapor deposition, sputtering, reflow, dipping, casting, extrusion processes or other mechanisms for attaching two or more materials together.
The tissue leaflet(s) can also be coated with drug(s) or other bioagents to prevent the formation of clots in the heart. Anti-calcification materials can also be coated or provided on the surface to prevent calcification.
The atrial flange 22, the annulus support 24 and the valve body 28 can be made from either a Nitinol superelastic material or stainless steel, Co—Cr based alloy, Titanium and its alloys, and other balloon expandable biocompatible materials, Other polymer biocompatible materials can also be used to fabricate these components of the device 20. In use, the device 20 can be folded or compacted into a delivery system and delivered to the location of the mitral valve through transcatheter delivery (e.g., transfemoral or transapical). Once at the location of the mitral valve, the device 20 can be released from the delivery system and positioned at the mitral valve annulus area. The atrial flange 22 can be placed at or on the native annulus of the mitral valve, with a portion of the atrial flange 22 extending inside the left atrium. See
The annulus support 24 functions as an anchoring feature, and can interact with the annulus, native leaflet(s), and other internal heart structures, or subvalvular structures, to provide the desired anchoring effect. See
An optional smaller diameter neck 26 provides a transition from the atrial flange 22 to the annulus support 24. When the device 20 is in the deployed configuration, the neck 26 extends radially inwardly from the atrial flange 22 to form a U-shaped neck 26. The cross-sectional profile of the neck 26 can either be a full circular shape or a profile that is different from a circular shape. Where the neck 26 has a full circular profile, its diameter can be in the range from 15 mm to 50 mm. so Where the neck 26 has a profile which is different from a circular shape, the long axis can be in the range from 15 mm to 50 mm, and the shorter axis can be in the range from 10 mm to 45 mm.
The neck 26 then transitions radially outwardly to the annulus support 24, which comprises a ring of U-shaped sections 29 that alternate with a ring of spaced-apart inverted V-shaped tabs 30. The neck 26 actually transitions radially outwardly to the ring of U-shaped sections 29, which extend radially outwardly before extending radially inwardly to transition to the valve body 28. The tabs 30 extend radially outwardly from the valve body 28 and have a generally perpendicular upward bend to define a ring that encircles the neck 26. The number of tabs 30 ranges from 1 to 20. The cross-sectional profile of the ring of tabs 30 can either be a full circular shape or a profile that is different from a circular shape. Where the ring of tabs 30 has a full circular profile, its diameter can be in the range from 15 mm to 70 mm. Where the ring of tabs 30 has a profile which is different from a circular shape, the long axis can be in the range from 15 mm to 70 mm, and the shorter axis can be in the range from 10 mm to 65 mm. The connection point of the inverted V-shape for the tabs 30 is an enlarged point 32 whose function is to contact or press against the annulus or the native leaflet(s) of the mitral valve region of the heart to secure the device 20 at the annulus area, and therefore function as anchoring features. Each tab 30 has a height H4 that ranges from 0.5 mm to 10 mm. The tabs 30 can be either fully or partially covered by tissue or fabrics. For example, the enlarged point 32 can be uncovered by fabric/tissue, while the remainder of the annulus support 24 can be covered. Use of fabric can promote tissue in-growth and provide better securement of the device 20 at the annulus in addition to providing additional sealing effect to prevent Perivalvular leakage (PVL).
Thus, the ring of U-shaped sections 29 has a diameter that is greater than the diameter of the valve body 28 and the neck 26, but less than the diameter of the atrial flange 22. Similarly, the ring of tabs 30 has a diameter that is greater than the diameter of the valve body 28 and the neck 26, but less than the diameter of the atrial flange 22. The tabs 30 and U-shaped sections 29 can be arranged to alternate each other in the same general ring, and can have diameters that are about the same as each other.
Two U-shaped tails 36 can extend from the valve body 28 at the end of the valve body 28. Even though two tails 36 are shown, it is possible to provide the device 20 with only one tail 36, or three or more tails 36. As best shown in
Referring to
In use, the device 20 can be compacted into a smaller profile for easy delivery and can be delivered and deployed once it reaches the target implant site. The compacted device profile can be less than 48 Fr, with 15 Fr to 40 Fr being the typical range for such applications
The leaflet structure is best shown in
Thus, the novel leaflet design of the present invention uses the reverse leaflet action to regulate the blood flow between the left atrium and left ventricle. This reverse or “umbrella-” or “balloon-like” leaflet(s) design provides better sealing/coaptation, and also improves fatigue performance of the valve body 28 by eliminating the contraction/squeezing force/deformation that typically acts on the valve body 28 using a conventional leaflet design.
The difference between the two embodiments is the addition of a ring of clips 80 that are provided in spaced-apart manner around the valve body 28 at a location spaced vertically below the annulus support 24. These clips 80 are somewhat L-shaped in that each clip 80 can extend vertically from any of the struts in the valve body 28, then horizontally in a radial direction before terminating in a short bend at its tip. The clips 80 function to clip or hold a portion of the native leaflet after the device 20 has been deployed, as best shown in
Once the device 20 is implanted, the atrial flange 22, the valve body 28 and the anchoring mechanisms (e.g., the clipping effect of the atrial flange and the tabs 30; the addition of the clips 80) built into it or created by the interaction of the device 20 with native leaflet(s) and other internal heart structure (or other subvalvular structures) will maintain the device 20 in the desired position. During ventricular systole, when the valve created by the leaflet(s) 48 and the valve body 28 is closed, the pressure from the left ventricle will generate an uplifting force and trying to push the device 20 up toward the atrium. That is one of the reasons why a reliable and adequate anchoring mechanism is needed to maintain the device 20 in position after the device 20 is implanted. For example, during heart contraction, the tissue leaflet(s) 48 will close the valve lumen, so that the blood will be pumped toward the aortic valve to the aorta. In the mean time, the native leaflet(s) move up (inward) toward the outside surface of the valve body 28 (wrap around), and try to seal/close the mitral valve to prevent PVL. The anchoring feature(s) built in the device 20 can engage the native leaflet(s) and other internal heart structure to prevent the device 20 from being pushed upward. During heart relaxation, the tissue leaflet(s) 48 on the device 20 will turn to a smaller profile to allow the blood to flow through and fill the left ventricle. The tissue leaflet(s) 48 can be operated (opened or closed) by the combined effect of blood flow, cardiac pressure, and cyclic-pulsatile movement of the supporting structure during the cardiac cycle.
In addition to the anchoring effect of the anchoring mechanisms (annulus support 24 and tabs 30), the pressure applied on to the valve body 28 by the native leaflet(s) during ventricular systole can also help to keep the device 20 from moving upward to the atrium by applying a clamping force onto the device 20. This is a dynamic anchoring mechanism and it takes effect only during the ventricular systole, at which stage, the device 20 under the highest uplifting force trying to push the device 20 up toward the atrium direction. This additional dynamic anchoring effect helps to maintain the proper position of the device 20 and reduces the anchoring force and its duration acting onto the native heart anatomy. Over time, tissue growth/healing would connect/fuse the native leaflet(s) onto the valve body 28.
The atrial flange 22a is similar to the atrial flange 22, except that the atrial flange 22a may have a lower profile. A ring of spaced-apart inverted V-shaped tabs 34a defines peaks and valleys for the atrial flange 22a, with a rounded non-traumatic tip 35a at each peak thereof. A plurality of leaflet holders or posts 37a extends from selected tips 35a, and each functions to support and hold portions of the leaflet. Each post 37a can be straight or curved.
The atrial flange 22a can be placed at or on the native annulus of the mitral valve, with a portion of the atrial flange 22a extending inside the left atrium. See
The atrial flange 22a can either have a circular profile or a profile different from a full circle (e.g., D-shaped or oval). Where the atrial flange 22a has a circular profile, the diameter of the atrial portion can be in the range from 12 mm to 75 mm. If the atrial flange 22a has a profile which is different from full circle, the long axis can be in the range from 12 mm to 75 mm, and the shorter axis can be in the range from 6 mm to 70 mm. In addition, the height H11 of the atrial flange 22a can range from 0.5 mm to 30 mm. The atrial flange 22a can be either fully or partially covered by fabric or tissue material, or a combination of tissue and fabric materials.
The annulus support 24a functions as an anchoring feature, and can interact with the annulus, native leaflet(s), and other internal heart structures, or subvalvular structures, to provide the desired anchoring effect. In addition to the anchoring effect provided by the annulus support 24a, the “clipping effect” created by the atrial flange 22a and the anchors 29a (explained below) can also help the device 20a to self-align and to resist potential migration during cardiac cycle. During the release of the device 20a from the delivery system, the components of the device 20a will be released out of the delivery system in sequence. For example, during transapical delivery, the atrial flange 22a will be deployed from the delivery system first, then the annulus support 24a, or vice versa. In contrast, during transfemoral (trans-septal) delivery, the annulus support 24a will be deployed first, then the atrial flange 22a. The procedures can be performed under the guidance from x-ray and/or TEE, ICE, etc.
The neck 26a transitions from the flange 22a radially outwardly to the annulus support 24a, which comprises a ring of anchors 29a. The neck 26a actually transitions radially outwardly to the ring of anchors 29a, which extend radially outwardly before extending radially inwardly to transition to the V-shaped tabs 28a that extend into the ventricular portion. The number of anchors 29a ranges from 1 to 20. The cross-sectional profile of the ring of anchors 29a can either be a full circular shape or a profile (e.g., oval or D-shaped) that is different from a circular shape. Where the ring of anchors 29a has a full circular profile, its diameter can be in the range from 10 mm to 75 mm. Where the ring of anchors 29a has a profile which is different from a circular shape, the long axis can be in the range from 10 mm to 75 mm, and the shorter axis can be in the range from 5 mm to 70 mm. An annular clipping space is defined between the ring of anchors 29a and the atrial flange 22a, and this clipping space has a height H14 (see
A plurality of enclosed valve holders 36a can extend from the V-shaped tabs 28a at the end of the ventricular portion. Even though a specific number of holders 36a are shown, it is possible to provide the device 20a with any number, ranging from one or more holders 36a. As best shown in
The ventricular portion can have a height H12 in the range from 2 mm to 15 mm. Thus, the combined valve body VB can have a height H13 in the range from 4 mm to 30 mm, and preferably between 8 mm to 20 mm. The cross-sectional profile of the ventricular portion can either be a full circular shape or a profile (e.g., oval or D-shaped) that is different from a circular shape. Where the ventricular portion has a full circular profile, its diameter can be in the range from 10 mm to 75 mm. Where the ventricular portion has a profile which is different from a circular shape, the long axis can be in the range from 10 mm to 75 mm, and the shorter axis can be in the range from 5 mm to 70 mm. The ventricular portion can also have a variable profile along its height. For example, the portion of the ventricular portion near the annulus support 24a can have an oval-shaped profile or some other profile which is different from a full circle, while the portion of the ventricular portion further away from the annulus support 24a can have a full circular profile. Also, once implanted, the ventricular portion can be positioned in the left ventricle only, in the left atrium only, or in both the left atrium and the left ventricle.
An important aspect of this embodiment is the shortened length (i.e., height H12) of the ventricular portion, resulting in a device 20a that has a shorter profile than conventional valve replacement devices. The shorter profile is beneficial in that it minimizes the potential LVOT obstruction to facilitate better cardiac output. In addition, the shorter profile minimizes the interference with the cardiac structures in the left ventricle, such as the chordaes, and the papalary muscles, among others.
As a result of the shortened profile, the tissue leaflet(s) are positioned primarily within the atrial flange 22 and above the atrial flange 22 (see
During transapical delivery, the ventricular portion and the holders 36a can be pulled straight and inserted into a delivery system. When deployed, the annulus support 24a is deployed either at the level of the native annulus or a level below the native annulus, and engages the native valvular structure through the dipping effect created by clipping the native annulus and/or native leaflets between the atrial flange 22a and the anchors 29a. See
The device 20a can be used for mitral valve replacement, or aortic valve replacement. For mitral valve replacement, the leaflet(s) can be positioned above, at or below the native annulus. For aortic valve replacement, the leaflet(s) can be positioned at or above the native annulus.
When the device 20a has been fully deployed inside the heart at the location of a mitral valve, the leaflet(s) will be positioned primarily above the location of the native annulus. See
The key advantages/novelty of the device 20 of the present invention include the following:
(1) the native leaflets and other internal valvular and subvalvular structures are preserved;
(2) the device 20 treats heart regurgitation with minimum interference/obstruction with the function of native structures of the heart, such as the chordae tendineae, papillary muscles, left ventricle, LVOT, impingement on the aortic valve etc.;
(3) the design of the device 20 considers the natural geometry and anatomy of the heart valve with minimal modification to the native heart valve, the profile of the annulus, surrounding structures, and sub-valvular structures;
(4) the device 20 has a design which self-conforms to the natural contour of the heart anatomy and the sealing portion at the annulus can contract and expand like a normal natural annulus;
(5) the profile of the device 20 can be set to a shape that is other than a full circle, such as a “D”-shape, a “”-shape, or an oval shape, to correspond to the profile of nature annulus, and the portion of the device 20 that contacts near the annulus can have a “V”-shaped profile to mimic the contour of nature mitral anatomy;
(6) the anchoring features on the device 20 utilize the native leaflets and other internal valvular or subvalvular structures;
(7) the device 20 can adjust its size/profile automatically to adapt to the left ventricle size/volume change after implantation;
(8) the device 20 can have variable profiles to help create the sealing effect during ventricular systole, and also provides a clamping effect by interaction between the native leaflet(s) to help maintain device position during ventricular systole; for example, the device 20 can have a “Transition Zone” between the atrial flange 22 and value body 28. The “Transition Zone” can have a profile which is different from other portions of the device 20. One example is that the “Transition Zone” can have an oval-shaped profile instead of a full circular profile. There is a long axis and a short axis in the Transition Zone, the long axis can be arranged in a direction along “commisure-to-commisure”, while the other axis is shorter than the longer axis. The oval profile in the Transition Zone can help to create an improved sealing effect at the commisure areas. The Transition Zone could also include the neck 26 to increase the “sealing” surface area. This also offers a dynamic anchoring effect to the device 20 and it takes effect during ventricular systole, at which stage the uplifting force acting on the device 20 is the highest;
(9) the device 20 has a design which uses the native leaflet(s) and chordae to provide both sealing effect and anchoring effect;
(10) the device 20 can be implanted surgically or though minimally-invasive procedures, such as transapical, transseptal, and transfemoral procedures;
(11) the tails 36 at the valve body 28 allow physicians sufficient time to adjust the valve position/angle for ideal valve performance during deployment; and
(12) the inner shaft inside the delivery system can be designed and made in a manner where it is movable during the valve deployment. For example, during delivery, once most of the device 20 is released/deployed from the delivery system, the leaflet(s) 48 on the device 20 will start to function as the heart beats. At this time, the inner shaft of the delivery system may still be inside the lumen of the device 20, and may affect the movement of one of the leaflets on the device 20. In this situation, the inner shaft in the delivery system may be loose from the proximal handle end of the delivery system, and pulled back proximally, so that the inner shaft will not be inside the lumen of the device. Therefore, all leaflet(s) 48 on the device 20 can move freely. This means that the device 20 can achieve a better valve function when the tails 36 are still connected with the delivery system. In other words, the fact that the leaflet(s) 48 on the device 20 are functioning during the deployment will give the physician more time to adjust the valve position/angle for optimal performance.
In addition to the securement mechanisms described above, adhesive bonding/interface can also be used to secure the device 20 in the native mitral position. One example is to use biocompatible glue/adhesive to connect/fix/secure the device 20 in the mitral position. In use, the biocompatible adhesive/glue can be applied on the outer surfaces of the device 20, such as along the outer surface of the valve body 28, the atrial flange 22 or any surface of the device 20 that might contact any native mitral structures, such as the annulus, the atrial surface above or on the annulus level, native leaflet(s), heart muscles, and other valvular and/or subvalvular structure(s), to maintain the position of the device 20 after implantation. Bioagents can also be added into the biocompatible adhesive/glue to promote healing and tissue growth.
The adhesive/glue can be fast reacting in nature, and form a bond with the native mitral structure instantly upon contact with the blood. It can also be actuated by heat or temperature; the heat or temperature can be generated/controlled by electrolytic heating, or FR heating, or ultrasound energy, or magnetic energy, or microwave energy, or the blood temperature itself, or chemical reaction, through the portion or entire structure of the device 20.
The adhesive/glue can be also be slow reacting in nature, and form a bond with the native mitral structure after a period of time upon contact with the blood. The time needed to form the bond can vary from 1 second to 2 hours, from 1 second to 28 hours, etc.
The adhesive/glue can also have a controlled reaction in nature, and form a bond with the native mitral structure in a controlled manner upon contact with the blood. One example of this concept is to apply a top layer (or layers) of other biocompatible materials over the adhesive/glue layer/material on the device 20. The top layer(s) of the other biocompatible material can be removed or dissolved in a controlled manner either through the use of energy, heating, chemical reaction, or mechanically, or magnetically, to ensure that the adhesive/glue underneath the top layer can effectively form the bond with the native mitral structure. As used herein, “controlled manner” means the time needed to form the bond can vary from 1 second to 48 hours.
While the description above refers to particular embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood that many modifications may be made without departing from the spirit thereof. The accompanying claims are intended to cover such modifications as would fall within the true scope and spirit of the present invention.
This application is related to Provisional Application No. 62/024,097, filed Jul. 14, 2014, Provisional Application No. 61/927,490, filed Jan. 15, 2014, and Provisional Application No. 61/887,343, filed Oct. 5, 2013. This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/279,511, filed May 16, 2014, whose entire disclosure is incorporated by this reference as though set forth fully herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5411552 | Andersen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5413599 | Imachi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5824064 | Taheri | Oct 1998 | A |
5957949 | Leonhardt | Sep 1999 | A |
6425916 | Garrison et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494909 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6572652 | Shaknovich | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6582462 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6652578 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
7329278 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7452371 | Pavcnik et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7510574 | Le et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7618446 | Andersen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7748389 | Salahieh et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7947075 | Goetz et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8070802 | Lamphere et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8252051 | Chau et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8403983 | Quadri et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8449599 | Chau et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8506620 | Ryan | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8613763 | Pavcnik et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20020032481 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020123802 | Snyders | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138138 | Yang | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151970 | Garrison et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030023300 | Bailey | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023303 | Palmaz | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030149477 | Gabbay | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030191527 | Shaknovich | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050137686 | Salaheih et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182486 | Gabbay | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203616 | Cribier | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060142848 | Gabbay | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149360 | Schwammenthal et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070078510 | Ryan | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168024 | Khairkhahan | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198097 | Zegdi | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070270943 | Solem et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004688 | Spenser et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090234446 | Berreklouw | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100249923 | Alkhatib et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110098800 | Braido et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106246 | Malewicz et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112632 | Chau et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110208298 | Tuval et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110319988 | Schankereli et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319989 | Lane et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016464 | Seguin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022639 | Hacohen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120046741 | Tuval et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120078353 | Quadri et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120095551 | Navia et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101572 | Kovalsky et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120179244 | Schankereli et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191182 | Hauser et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120323313 | Seguin | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323316 | Chau et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130090728 | Solem | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130131793 | Quadri et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138207 | Quardi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144380 | Quadri et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172992 | Gross et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130184811 | Rowe et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130190861 | Chau | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130211508 | Lane et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140046434 | Rolando et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140214159 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140257467 | Lane et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277390 | Ratz | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150142103 | Vidlund | May 2015 | A1 |
20150257878 | Lane et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160030171 | Quijano | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2874208 | Nov 2013 | CA |
2903600 | Sep 2014 | CA |
1264582 | Dec 2002 | EP |
2047824 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2003003943 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2003030776 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003047468 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2004019825 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2009053497 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009134701 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2013059747 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013075215 | May 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Supplementary European Search Report and Written Opinion, dated May 30, 2017, in a counterpart EP application, No. EP 14853635.2. |
International Search Report in the parent PCT application No. PCT/US2014/059076, dated Feb. 6, 2015. |
IPRP in the parent PCT application No. PCT/US2014/059076, dated Apr. 5, 2016. |
Japanese Office Action, dated Jul. 24, 2018 in a counterpart Japanese patent application, No. JP 2016-546888. |
Canadian Office Action, dated Nov. 9, 2018, in a counterpart Canadian patent application, No. 2,922,123. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180071084 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61927490 | Jan 2014 | US | |
62024097 | Jul 2014 | US | |
61887343 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15025008 | US | |
Child | 15808822 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14279511 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 15025008 | US |