Field of the Invention
The invention relates to an apparatus and a method for controlling the crystal growth of macromolecules, especially of biological macromolecules.
Description of the Related Art
A key task in the field of biochemistry and molecular biology is the atom-precise elucidation of three-dimensional structure of biomolecules, especially proteins. Most currently available structural models of proteins and other biomolecules in the resolution range of 0.25 nm and better were obtained using X-ray crystallography. A precondition for the application of this procedure is the presence of single crystals. The degree of internal order of the crystal determines significantly the quality of the data obtained and thus the precision of the elucidated structure.
Due to the large number of parameters that influence the crystallization of proteins (concentration of the material to be crystallized, the concentration of solvent, concentration of the precipitant, concentration further auxiliaries, changes in pH, changes in temperature, etc. . . . ) it is, to this day, hard to obtain reproducible results in crystallization.
From U.S. Pat. No. 4,919,899 an apparatus for the production of protein crystals is known. The method employed is known as the “hanging drop” method, wherein the concentration of the components of the droplets is controlled via evaporation or addition of the solvent. An automated optimization of the crystallization conditions is envisioned.
The dynamic control of crystal growth for proteins is also known from US2001006807 A1. Here, the concentration of the solvent is controlled via the temperature and the gas stream.
All known methods for reproducible and automated crystallization have in common that, by influencing a parameter, a predetermined or fixed path in the phase diagram is followed.
Especially water-insoluble proteins, such as membrane proteins which are of particular interest for drug activity investigation, are not available by reproducible and automated crystal growth.
It is an object of the invention to improve the crystallization of biomolecules, in particular proteins. Furthermore, it is an object of the invention to provide an apparatus and methods, which makes possible an automatable and reproducible growth of crystals from biological material. Furthermore, it is an object of the invention to provide an apparatus and method that allows reproducible and automatable growth of crystals of biological material, for which this has not been possible. Furthermore, it is an object of the invention to provide an apparatus and methods, which makes possible the reproducible and automated growth of crystals of biological material, without having to rely on trial and error.
Surprisingly, it has been found that it is possible to observe and influence the crystallization of biological macromolecules at a submicroscopic level, thus creating the opportunity to reach almost any point in the phase diagram, and to remain there, when the devices and methods described in the claims are used. The dependent claims describe advantageous embodiments of the invention.
The inventive method comprises the steps of
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not by limitation in the accompanying drawings in which like reference numbers indicate similar parts and in which:
The components of the apparatus (X-tal controller) in detail are:
Detergents that play an important role especially for the crystallization of membrane proteins include ionic or nonionic detergents. Preferably detergents have a saturated alkyl group. Such detergents include alkyl-beta-D-glucosides, alkyl-beta-D-thioglucosides, alkyl-beta-D-maltosides especially with heptyl-, octyl-, nonyl-alkyl groups. In detail dimethylamine, oligo-oxyethylene, n-tridecyl-β-D-maltopyranoside, n-dodecyl-β-D-thiomaltopyranoside, ANAPOE®-C12E9, octaethylene monodedecyl glycol ether, ANAPOE®-C12E8, ANAPOE®-C13E8, n-dodecyl-α-D-maltopyranoside, n-dodecyl-β-D-maltopyranoside, CYMAL®-7, ANAPOE®-X-114, ANAPOE®-C12E10, n-undecyl-β-thiomaltopyranoside, ANAPOE®X-100, sucrose monododecanoate, CYMAL®-6, n-undecyl-α-D-maltopyranoside, n-undecyl-β-D-maltopyranoside, CYCLOFOS™-7, pentaethylene monodecylether, n-decyl-β-D-maltopyranoside, ANAPOE®-C10E6, n-decyl-β-D-maltopyranoside, ANAPOE®-C10E9, n-decyl-β-D-maltopyranoside, CYMAL®-5, n-nonyl-β-D-thiomaltopyranoside, dimethyldecylphosphine oxide, n-nonyl-β-D-maltopyranoside, n-nonyl-β-D-glucopyranoside, CYMAL®-4, tetraethylene glycol monomethyl ether, n-octyl-β-D-thiomaltopyranoside, hexaethyleneglycol monooctylether, ANAMEG®-7 can be used as detergents.
As precipitants there may be organic compounds, as well as organic and inorganic salts. As organic compounds there may be, for example, polyethylene glycol, isopropanol or dimethyl sulfoxide, as inorganic salts there may be, inter alia, sodium chloride, ammonium sulfate or lithium chloride. Possible organic salts may be amongst others sodium acetate, sodium citrate or sodium tartrate.
As ligands there may be all kinds of natural products up to proteins, as well as all types of synthetic compounds.
Additives can be used which positively affect the crystallization of the protein. These may be, for example, antioxidants (ascorbic acid, lecithin, stannous chloride), amphiphilic (1,2,3 heptane triol, benzamindine) or divalent metal ions (magnesium chloride, calcium chloride or acetate).
For cross-linking (cross-linking reagents) substances can be used which join two polymers together. Here, the compounds can have covalent or ionic character. Examples are: 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC), succinimidyl-4-[N-maleimidomethyl] cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC), (dithiobis [succinimidylpropionate]) (DSP).
As a cryoprotectant are preferably used glycerol, PEG 200-600, glucose, inositol, ethylene glycol and isopropanol.
As buffers, there may be employed all of the compounds of this type that include tris (hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane (TRIS), phosphate buffer (NaH2PO4+Na2HPO4), 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic (HEPES) and 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES).
The inventive method is based on the extraction of information from the drops and the use of this information for targeted intervention in the composition of the crystallization batch by addition or removal of substances. By measuring the changes in weight using a fine scale it is possible to quantify the individual components in the drop.
The precipitant concentration can be increased, as well as decreased. This is done by adding the precipitant solution via the microdosage system or by evaporation in the case of increase in concentration. Reducing precipitant concentration can be effected by addition of water or a mixture of all other components.
The system also permits addition of other substances in the sample to induce chemical reactions.
Another application is the addition of substances that cause a reduction in freezing point of the mother liquor. This is an important application in the field of protein crystallization. The antifreeze solution prevents the formation of water ice. This treatment may be necessary, since the diffraction experiments are usually performed at 100° K in order to minimize radiation damage.
The phase diagram shows the existence of areas of the phases or states of matter of a substance or mixture of substances depending upon thermodynamic parameters.
The crystal growth represents a central goal of the intervention in the crystallization system. (As long as the crystals grow and that no new crystals are formed one has done everything right.) Crystal growth at constant crystal number is only possible within the metastable zone in the phase diagram. In the nucleation zone crystal growth likewise occurs, however, with persistent nucleation the number of the crystals increases continuously. In the undersaturated area the number of crystals remains constant but it also no crystal growth takes place. Sometimes, even a shrinking of crystals is observed.
The results of the DLS measurement showed that an enormous number of nuclei were present in a broad size distribution in the mother liquor, before crystals begin to grow in such a solution (
The carrying out of a crystallization experiment to produce crystals of biological macromolecules always begins with the sample application. The sample is a drop of an aqueous protein solution in a volume of between 1 and 100 μl. The sample is pipetted onto a sample holder, or applied with an appropriate dosing device. The sample holder is located in the weighing position of the ultra-fine scale and allows the laser beam for the dynamic light scattering (DLS) to be sent in the sample. Simultaneously, the sample is observed by microscope camera optics.
The position of the sample allows the addition of solvent by a metering microdosing in minute droplets (˜30 pl), to compensate for a steady loss of solvent from the droplets by evaporation. All components are housed in temperature- and humidity- and gas composition-controlled process chamber. A sample radius distribution obtained by DLS measurement of the protein molecules in solution at the beginning of the experiment is shown in
The DLS measurement output serves for assurance that the sample contains no interfering particles such as protein aggregates or solid contaminants that may affect both the measurement and the crystallization. During this DLS output measurement the weight of the sample is kept constant by the microdosing (
If, during the DLS measurement, the sample starting measurement is as in FIG. 4—and thus suitable for crystallization, one can begin with the actual crystallization experiment. Typically, the crystallization of biological macromolecules is performed by the addition of a substance (precipitant) which competes with the dissolved protein molecules for the water of hydration and thereby favors interactions between the protein molecules with each other. Interactions of protein molecules together usually lead to a combining of the protein molecules which are then present as nuclei whose radius is measured by DLS. Depending on the amount of added precipitant this reaction takes place in different forms.
The amount of added precipitant can be read with reference to the weight curve.
The use of the ultra-fine scale allows the calculation of the concentration ratios in the sample during the period of B3 in
The intensity of the nucleation depends in part on the concentration ratios of the components and on the protein used.
The continuous crystallization is observed by the microscope optics. As soon as the crystals are fully grown, they can be removed from the apparatus.
The DLS measurements as well as measured concentration ratios of the components in the sample, which can be calculated by the weight curves, allow an assignment to the positions in the phase diagram. In
A schematic representation of the inventive process can be found in
C, D: solvent vapor diffusion in a conventional crystallization experiment. This increases both the protein and the concentration of precipitant in the same proportion as employed in the formation of nuclei in the nucleation zone. By the growth of the forming crystals the protein is removed from the solution, so that the protein concentration decreases.
By measuring the change in weight of the establishment of a closed control loop is possible. Via feedback, it is possible to maintain certain concentration conditions for long periods or to target certain concentration ratios.
With this method, it is possible to maneuver back and forth in the phase diagram or to stay at certain positions which are suitable, for example, for optimal growth of a crystal.
Dynamic light scattering allows the measurement of the size distribution of the particles in the sample. In crystallization, a distinction is made between two steps: 1 formation of nuclei (nucleation) and 2 crystal growth. Both steps take place in properly selected conditions in a region of the phase diagram, which is called the supersaturated solution. Nuclei are small particles, their size distribution and quantity is determined in a specific case by light scattering measurement.
The nucleation zone generally has a higher degree of supersaturation than the growth region which is also referred to as a metastable zone. For nucleation, the concentrations of the precipitant need to be higher than in the metastable zone. Under these conditions, however, there is also a rapid growth of the nuclei, and there is a risk of creating a large number of however very small crystals.
For X-ray analysis, however, there is interest in large single crystals (about 0.5 mm in size). That means for the experiment that one quite rapidly approaches the nucleation zone, but does not spend too much time in this concentration range, so that few as possible nuclei arise. By adding a solvent to the sample the nucleation zone is left again, but only until the metastable zone is reached. Under these conditions the concentration ratios of protein and precipitant are then kept constant long enough until the crystals have reached their maximum size.
A flow chart for the novel automated crystal growth is found in
In a cybernetic control loop, the inventive device (X-tal controller) can precisely regulate the molecular composition of the crystallization solution using the diagnostic sensors and micro dosing system. It is now possible for the first time to dwell at any point of the phase diagram and from there to navigate to any point. The phase diagram is therefore not passed through in only one direction, under more or less controlled speed, as is the case with the prior art methods. It is thus possible to control the crystallization and not specifically to depend on trial and error. Below the reference numerals for
In the following an embodiment of the invention is explained in detail.
In the X-tal controller, the transition from the metastable zone to the precipitation zone can be detected (
In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 025 842 | Jul 2010 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2011/001393 | 6/30/2011 | WO | 00 | 2/12/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/000493 | 1/5/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4727024 | Koocher et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4919899 | Herrmann et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5619043 | Preikschat et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
7470324 | Hoffmann | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20010006807 | Bray et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20030233978 | Niimura et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20070017291 | Cypes et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20090168066 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130139749 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |