1. Field of the Invention
The present invention concerns a device and a method for processing and presentation of x-ray images.
2. Description of the Prior Art
For diagnostic and therapeutic purposes it is helpful to isolate regions in x-ray images. A segmentation or subject recognition in x-ray images is implemented with segmentation or subject recognition algorithms, wherein the x-ray images used for this have been generated with a conventional x-ray dose. X-ray images that have been created with distinctly reduced individual image dose during a tomographic method (for example tomosynthesis) require a highly complex and time-consuming computation effort in order to implement a segmentation or a subject recognition with the segmentation or a subject recognition algorithms cited above since—due to the very low individual x-ray image dose—the x-ray images do not exhibit the contrast of the aforementioned x-ray images.
An object of the present invention is to provide an improved device and method for processing and presentation of subjects in x-ray images.
This object is achieved in accordance with the invention by a device for processing and presentation of x-ray images that has an x-ray acquisition unit as well as an optical acquisition unit, with the acquisition cones of the x-ray image of the x-ray acquisition unit as well as of the optical image of the optical acquisition unit being congruent, and wherein an x-ray acquisition and optical acquisition are triggered to occur at the same point in time, and having a subject extraction unit for segmentation and/or edge extraction in the subject in the optical exposure, and having a combination unit for additive merging of the x-ray image with the extracted subject edges from the optical image associated therewith.
Described in the following are a device and a method according to the invention in which an optical video image and an associated x-ray image of a subject are acquired with identical acquisition format. The x-ray images and the video images belonging to them are brought into registration with one another and therefore respectively show the identical image section with identical scaling. This can be achieved (for example as shown in
The invention also has the advantage that a segmentation in the optical images can be conducted quickly, precisely and reproducibly.
The invention has the additional advantage that the subject edges in the x-ray images can be exactly specified with simultaneous dose reduction.
The invention has the further advantage that a simple algorithm for subject edge detection can be applied to the acquired high-contrast optical image.
Components of a mammography apparatus are depicted in
A subject extraction unit VEOB downstream from the association unit ZE extracts the respective subject 6 imaged in the individual image. An extraction of the subject can ensue with a threshold or edge detection algorithm, for example. The subject edges are detected using an adaptive threshold regulation, and the data from these subject edges are stored in an additional individual image associated with the optical image. In a further processing procedure, an x-ray image associated with the respective optical image is read out from the memory unit SR for x-ray images and cached in a combination unit KE. In the combination unit KE, the respective x-ray image is loaded with the data of the subject edges. An x-ray image supplemented with subject edges is output individually or additively as a sum image to a visualization unit VE.
The processing steps in a block diagram are summarized in
Although modifications and changes may be suggested by those skilled in the art, it is the intention of the inventors to embody within the patent warranted hereon all changes and modifications as reasonably and properly come within the scope of their contribution to the art.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 049 539 | Oct 2007 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5396604 | DeLano et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5539798 | Asahina et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5872828 | Niklason et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6305842 | Kunert | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6473489 | Bani-Hashemi et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
7198404 | Navab et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2005036148 | Apr 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090097615 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |