The present invention relates in general to a device and method for substantially reducing the caloric efficiency of the digestive tract by capturing food being digested in the stomach and/or anywhere else in the GI tract, into entrapping members; moving the entrapping member containing said food down the GI tract, thus excluding at least part of the food intake from being absorbed in the small intestine and further down the GI tract.
Obesity is a chronic disease due to excess fat storage, a genetic predisposition, and strong environmental contributions. This problem is worldwide, and the incidence is increasing daily. There are medical, physical, social, economic, and psychological comorbid conditions associated with obesity. There is no cure for obesity except possibly prevention. Non-surgical treatment has been inadequate in providing sustained weight loss. Currently, surgery offers the only viable treatment option with long-term weight loss and maintenance for the morbidly obese. Surgeries for weight loss are called bariatric surgeries. There is no one operation that is effective for all patients. Gastric bypass operations are the most common operations currently used. Because there are inherent complications from surgeries, bariatric surgeries should be performed in a multidisciplinary setting. The laparoscopic approach is being used by some surgeons in performing the various operations. The success rate—usually defined as >50% excess weight loss that is maintained for at least five years from bariatric surgery—ranges from 40% in the simple to >70% in the complex operations. The weight loss from surgical treatment results in significant improvements and, in some cases, complete resolution of comorbid conditions associated with obesity. Patients undergoing surgery for obesity need lifelong nutritional supplements and medical monitoring.
It is accepted that patients suffering from obesity are at a substantially increased risk of medical ailments and a range of diseases, including: Type II diabetes, heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, certain cancers, and other disorders. Furthermore, patients suffering morbid obesity have life expectancy that is significantly reduced, by at least ten to fifteen years.
For patients suffering from extremely severe obesity (morbid obesity), i.e. for patients whose weight exceeds the ideal weight by at least 50 kilograms, for example, it is absolutely essential to operate surgically on such patients in order to avoid not only a series of health problems that stem from such obesity, but also to avoid certain and imminent death of such patients.
It has also been observed that treatment based on a severe diet combined with a series of physical exercises associated with a change in behavior, in particular eating behavior, are relatively ineffective in such cases of morbid obesity, even though such methods of treatment are the most healthy.
Methods that have been used in the prior art to treat obesity include gastric bypasses and small-bowel bypasses such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,558,400 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,543,456. The number of these bariatric surgeries has skyrocketed from 40,000 per year back then to 120,000 in 2002. Many complications are associated with these procedures. Many patients have suffered serious side effects and regret having had it.
Other methods aim at reducing the effective volume of the stomach to induce a satiety feeling by the patient and hence reducing the calorie intake per meal.
One such method is the stapling of portions of the stomach has also been used to treat obesity, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,345,949. This includes both vertical and horizontal stapling and other variations trying to reduce the size of the stomach or make a small stoma opening. Many problems have been associated with the use of staples. First, staples are undependable; second, they may cause perforations; and the pouch or stoma opening formed by the staples becomes enlarged over time making the procedure useless.
Another method that has been developed is the placement of an inflatable bag or balloon into the stomach causing the recipient to feel “full”. Such a procedure has been described in the patent to Garren et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,416,267. The balloon is inflated to approximately 80% of the stomach volume and remains in the stomach for a period of about three months or more. This procedure, although simple, has resulted in intestinal blockage, gastric ulcers, and even in one instance, death and fails to address the problems of potentially deleterious contact with the gastric mucosa which can result from leaving an inflated bag in the stomach for an extended period of time. Moreover, it also failed to produce significant weight loss for long periods of time.
Yet another method employs the placement of a band around a portion of the stomach thereby compressing the stomach and creating a stoma opening that is less than the normal interior diameter of the stomach for restricting food intake into the lower digestive portion of the stomach. Kuzmak et al in U.S. patent have described such a band. U.S. Pat. No. 4,592,339. It comprises a substantially non-extensible belt-like strap, which constrictively encircles the outside of the stomach thereby preventing the stoma opening from expanding. Kuzmak et al also describe bands, which include a balloon-like section that is expandable and deflatable through a remote injection site. The balloon-like expandable section is used to adjust the size of the stoma opening both intra-operatively and post-operatively.
Complications have been observed with both inflatable and non-inflatable gastric bands. In particular, obstruction of the stoma from edema and migration of the band has been observed. Such edema-caused obstruction of the stoma may be due to excessive vomiting. In these cases, the stoma must be enlarged either by deflating the expandable portion of a band or by removing the band altogether.
Yet another method is to impose satiety. U.S. Pat. No. 6,677,318, describing a swellable sponge-like structure. These structures are swallowed by the patient being collapsed inside a capsule. The capsule dissolves in the stomach and the polymer structure with super absorbing characteristics; absorb the gastric juices, which cause the structure to swell considerably. This patent aims to reduce food intake by causing the recipient to feel “full”, yet the absorbed content of the sponge is finally digested.
Lipase inhibition as a mean for reducing lipid intake is well known in the art, the major draw back is the oily stool as a side effect. To overcome this side effect, polymers capable of absorbing lipids where introduce, as in U.S. Pat. No. 4,432,968, but as the absorption is reversible and shifted backwards as a result of bile salt emulsifier, the overall entrapment was quite poor.
In order to overcome the a forth mentioned drawbacks, the present invention relates on a lipid absorption polymer having an prolonged equilibrium period in the range of 4-8 hours so as to keep the absorption step active during the relevant period in the digestion tract.
It is then the object of this invention to overcome these and other deficiencies described above.
The invention seeks to provide a successful and non-invasive alternative to existing approaches for controlling obesity.
The invention objective is to substantially reduce the caloric efficiency of the digestive tract by capturing food being digested in the stomach and/or anywhere else in the GI tract into entrapping members; moving the entrapping member containing the entrapped food ingredients down the gastrointestinal tract, thus excluding at least part of the entrapped food from being absorbed in the small intestine.
Another objective of this invention is to introduce a lipid absorption polymer having an prolonged equilibrium period in the range of 4-8 hours so as to keep the absorption step active during the relevant period in the digestion tract.
Another objective of this invention is to interfere with the micelles formation and capture the free lipids contained within.
Another objective of this invention is to provide a delivery system of the material via means of compressing the material so that it takes less space in the intake, and when the capsule, for example, opens up or dissolves, the individual particles of the material expand to accommodate the captured liquids.
In one embodiment, the device is comprised of a capsule system for oral delivery. The capsule system is comprised of an external capsule made of gelatin—as an example that dissolves in accordance with a temporal preset, which allows the food intake to be at least partially fluidic. The capsule system is further comprised of an internal permeable bag having a structure such as meshed, woven or fibers, made of disintegrable material such as gelatin for example, which bag contain expandable, super absorbent beads, which dry beads are larger than the pores of the bag, which bag is inflatable. When the bag comes in contact with the fluidic content of the stomach, fluids penetrate into the bag. The fluids are absorbed by the expandable, hydrogel beads enclosed. These beads expand partially or until they reach the absorption capacity limit. Optionally, the internal bag further contains a coating capsule, which dissolves at this time and coats the expandable beads, to seals and protects them from disintegration or prevent leakage of entrapped liquid, throughout their journey out of the GI tract.
For the sake of clarity, a capsule is a sealed container and a hag is a permeable containers.
In other embodiments, the external capsule contains folded mechanical structures, which open up to captures some of the stomach content and protects them from disintegration throughout their journey through and out of the GI tract.
Further scope of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given herein below and the accompanying drawings, which are given by way of illustration only and thus not limitative of the present invention.
a is a view of the external capsule.
b is a view of the internal bag.
c is a view of an expandable bead.
d is a view of a coating capsule.
a illustrates of the capsule system entering the stomach at t1.
b illustrates the external capsule dissolving at t2.
c illustrates the expandable beads expanding as they absorb stomach fluids.
d illustrates the expandable beads reaching the size limits of the internal bag at t4.
e illustrates the rupture of the coating capsule at t4.
f illustrates the internal capsule dissolving at t5.
g and
a-d illustrates another embodiment of the invention.
a-c illustrates another embodiment of the invention.
a-c illustrates yet another embodiment of the invention.
Before explaining embodiments of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The materials, methods, and examples provided herein are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
In accordance with one basic embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in
In practice, the pill is ingested, and the capsule 100 dissolves at a temporal preset, beads 300 which are now in contact with the content of the food being digested, absorbs caloric enriched liquid and swells. Next the beads along with content of the stomach 10 are moved into the small intestine, where the entrapped content of the beads are practically not involved in the digestion and absorbing steps in the intestine. It is plausible to design the beads such that they will continue to absorb digested food in the small intestine and further down the GI tract.
In another embodiment, similar to the first embodiment, the beads are pre coated or pre absorbed by a composition capable of forming at least a partial nutrient barrier on small intestine. The composition helps further to reduce the absorption of food in case of leaking from the bead.
a illustrates the opened external capsule, which opens into two halves 201 and 202 at time t2 (see
a illustrates the assembled capsule being swallowed by the patient at time t1 (see
b illustrates the dissolution of the external capsule in the stomach 10 at time t2. At this time the super absorbing expandable beads 300 are exposed to the stomach 10 fluids and start absorbing them, as illustrated in
Optionally, after the expandable beads 300 fill out the space allowed by the internal bag 200, as illustrated in
Once all the expandable beads 300 are coated, at time t5 (see
Thus the content of the expandable beads 300 which contains ingested food remains untouched, is not digested and absorbed by the body and hence reduces the calorie efficiency of the meal.
In another embodiment of this invention, time t5 (see
In another embodiment (not shown) the fluids pass on their way to the super absorbable beads through a filter which is wide on the outer side and narrow in the inner side. This makes it easy for the fluids the flow inward the beads and hard to flow back.
In yet another embodiment of this invention, a polymer capable of absorbing lipid having an prolonged equilibrium period in the range of 4-8 hours so as to keep the absorption step active during the relevant period in the digestion tract, is provided. One such polymer for example is Polypore, having high absorption ratio of 13 gr lipid to 1 gr polymer.
Another embodiment of the present invention is to interfere with the micelles which are necessary for the lipid digestion activity. The purpose of the polymer is to disassemble the micelles and extract the lipids. Such a polymer is, for example, isss Gantrez® series, especially Gantrez 225 and Gantrez 425.
So when a mixture of Polypore and Gantrez are introduced to the small intestine, the Gantrez will interfere with the micelle formation equilibrium, and the polypore will absorb the free lipids without the highly competitive back extraction mechanism.
Another embodiment of this invention is illustrated in
Another embodiment of this invention is illustrated in
In another embodiment the force (such as spring force or elastic force) is being loaded into the small structures 700 before using the capsule.
Another embodiment of this invention is illustrated in
In another embodiment the folded structures are polymer beads and the force applied to them before delivery to compress the beads substantially so that they take less space on the intake but open inside the GI tract to capture various liquids. One such polymer, for example, is Polypore, having high absorption ratio of 13 gr lipid to 1 gr polymer and high ratio of its free form volume to its compressed form.
The invention being thus described in terms of several examples and embodiments, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.
This present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/581,175, which claims the benefit of PCT application no. PCT/IL05/00154 filed on Feb. 8, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 60/542,843 filed on Feb. 10, 2004 all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3485235 | Ronald | Dec 1969 | A |
3797492 | Place | Mar 1974 | A |
3844285 | Laby | Oct 1974 | A |
4207890 | Mamajek et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4268497 | Griffin et al. | May 1981 | A |
4308250 | Griffin et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4416267 | Garren et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4432968 | Page et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4434153 | Urquhart et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4592339 | Kuzmak et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4763653 | Rockey | Aug 1988 | A |
4767627 | Caldwell et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4812315 | Tarabishi | Mar 1989 | A |
5306300 | Berry | Apr 1994 | A |
5326564 | LaRosa et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5345949 | Shlain | Sep 1994 | A |
5971942 | Gu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6120803 | Wong et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6488962 | Berner et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6543456 | Freeman | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558400 | Deem et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6627206 | Lloyd | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635281 | Wong et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6677318 | Beisel | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685962 | Friedman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6776999 | Krumme | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6981980 | Sampson et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7449001 | Stoltz | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7611480 | Levy | Nov 2009 | B2 |
8722066 | Costa | May 2014 | B2 |
20030072804 | Hird et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20070202152 | Drouillard et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070207186 | Scanlon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070293426 | Demuth | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080089933 | Alon et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080241094 | Burnett et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090028996 | Yamka et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090035367 | Mintchev et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100196470 | Alon et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110295299 | Braithwaite et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20140276330 | Costa | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150030639 | Costa | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104640604 | May 2015 | CN |
WO 02102243 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2005074378 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2010063466 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010110882 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2011038949 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO 2013148359 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Lambert et al “Autonomous telemetric capsule to explore the small bowel,” Med. & Biol. Eng. & Compt., 1991, 29, 191-196. |
PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IL2005/000154 filed Feb. 8, 2005 in the name of Katz, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Aug. 30, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,841, filed Apr. 9, 2010 in the name of Alon et al., non-final Office Action mailed May 26, 2010. |
PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/000872 filed Mar. 23, 2010 in the name of Costa, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 17, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/581,175, filed Oct. 16, 2006 in the name of Alon et al., non-final Office Action mailed Jun. 22, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/581,175, filed Oct. 16, 2006 in the name of Alon et al., final Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,841, filed Apr. 9, 2010 in the name of Alon et al., final Office Action mailed Dec. 8, 2010. |
Bhattarai et al., “Chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled, localized drug delivery”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 62 (2010) pp. 83-99. |
Lee et al., “Review: Biomedical applications of callagen”, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 221 (2001) pp. 1-22. |
MedlinePLus, “Nitrofurantoin”, Feb. 22, 2010, pp. 1-3, <http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/meds/a682291.html>. |
PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/032513 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 17, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/431,076 Final Office Action mailed Oct. 10, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/431,076 Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/272,342 Office Action mailed Jan. 15, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/272,342 Final Office Action mailed Aug. 12, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/841,138 Office Action mailed Sep. 11, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100215733 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60542843 | Feb 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11581175 | Oct 2006 | US |
Child | 12757843 | US | |
Parent | PCT/IL2005/000154 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 11581175 | US |