The present disclosure relates to a device and a method for reducing carbon dioxide.
The purpose of the present disclosure is to provide a novel device and method for reducing carbon dioxide. A device for reducing carbon dioxide includes a vessel for holding an electrolyte solution including carbon dioxide, a working electrode, and a counter electrode. The working electrode contains at least one boride selected from the group consisting of strontium hexaboride (SrB6), calcium hexaboride (CaB6), barium hexaboride (BaB6), lanthanum hexaboride (LaB6), and cerium hexaboride (CeB6). The counter electrode may contain one of platinum, gold, silver, copper, nickel and titanium.
The working electrode may contain particles of the metal boride disposed on a substrate. The substrate may be a carbon paper, a noble metal substrate, a glassy carbon substrate or a conductive silicon substrate.
The device may further include a solid electrolyte membrane interposed between the working electrode and the counter electrode. The device may further include a reference electrode.
A method for reducing carbon dioxide according to the present disclosure includes a step (a) of preparing any one of the devices as set forth above. The vessel holds an electrolyte solution containing carbon dioxide. The metal boride of the working electrode is in contact with the electrolytic solution. The method further includes a step (b) of applying a negative voltage and a positive voltage to the working electrode and the counter electrode respectively to reduce the carbon dioxide contained in the electrolytic solution. By the reduction reaction, at least one of methane, ethylene, ethan and formic acid is generated.
In the step (b), a potential difference applied between the working electrode and the counter electrode is not less than 2.0 volts.
The present disclosure provides a novel device and method for reducing carbon dioxide.
The exemplary embodiments are described below.
In the step (a), a device for reducing carbon dioxide is prepared. As shown in
The working electrode 11 contains metal hexaboride such as strontium hexaboride (SrB6), calcium hexaboride (CaB6), barium hexaboride (BaB6), lanthanum hexaboride (LaB6), or cerium hexaboride (CeB6). The working electrode 11 can be fabricated as below.
First, boride particles are dispersed in an organic solvent to form slurry. Next, the slurry is applied to a porous conductive base material to obtain the working electrode 11. This base material preferably has a shape of a film. An example of the base material is a carbon paper, a noble metal substrate, a glassy carbon substrate, or a conductive silicon substrate. The working electrode may be formed by a sputtering method.
The working electrode 11 is in contact with (immersed in) the electrolytic solution 15. To be exact, the boride which the working electrode 11 comprises is in contact with the electrolytic solution 15. In
The counter electrode 13 contains metal. An example of the preferred metal is platinum, gold, silver, copper, nickel, and titanium. As long as the metal is not electrolyzed, the material of the metal is not limited.
The counter electrode 13 is in contact with the electrolytic solution 15. To be exact, the metal which the counter electrode 13 comprises is in contact with the electrolytic solution 15. In
As shown in
It is preferred that a solid electrolyte membrane 16 is provided in the vessel 21. This reason is described later in the step (b). The solid electrolyte membrane 16 is interposed between the working electrode 11 and the counter electrode 13 to divide the electrolytic solution 15 into a first liquid 15L and a second liquid 15R. The counter electrode 13 is in contact with the first liquid 15L. The working electrode is in contact with the second liquid 15R.
In the step (b), a negative voltage and a positive voltage are applied to the working electrode 11 and the counter electrode 13, respectively. This causes the carbon dioxide contained in the electrolytic solution 15 (to be exact, the second liquid 15R) to be reduced on the working electrode 11. As a result, at lease one of carbon monoxide, formic acid, and methane is generated on the working electrode 11. On the counter electrode 13, water is oxidized to form oxygen.
It is preferred to use a potentiostat 14 to apply a potential difference between the working electrode 11 and the counter electrode 13.
The potential difference applied between the working electrode 11 and the counter electrode 13 is preferably not less than 1.8 volts. This corresponds to the fact that carbon dioxide reduction current is measured at not more than −0.5 volts (and not less than −1.6 volts) in the example 1, which is described later.
In the preferable embodiment, the solid electrolyte membrane 16 is provided. Only a proton penetrates the solid electrolyte membrane 16. An example of the solid electrolyte membrane 16 is a Nafion (Registered Trademark) film, which is available from Dupont Kabushiki Kaisha.
The solid electrolyte membrane 16 prevents a reverse reaction on the counter electrode 13. Namely, when the carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, or methane, which is generated on the working electrode 11, reaches the counter electrode 13, it is oxidized on the counter electrode 13 to return to carbon dioxide. The solid electrolyte membrane 16 prevents this reverse reaction.
As shown in
The present device and method are described in more detail by the following example.
Particles of strontium hexaboride (SrB6, Furuuchi Chemical, purity of 99%) having an average particle size of several microns are disposed, with a distribution density of 1×107 particle/cm2, on a conductive carbon paper (CP) having a thickness of 0.5 mm, thereby making an electrode catalyst (working electrode) according to the present subject matter. Using this electrode catalyst, electrochemical reduction reaction of CO2 was performed.
First of all, (1) a nitrogen gas was introduced into an electrolyte for 30 minutes with a flow rate of 200 ml/min, keeping a bubbling state to exclude CO2 from the electrolyte solution. Under this state, the electric potential was changed, and a curve of reduction current—electrolysis voltage (C-V curve) was measured. Next, (2) the gas was switched from nitrogen to CO2 and the CO2 gas was introduced into the electrolyte 15 for 30 minutes with the same flow rate of 200 ml/min so that the electrolyte 15 was saturated with CO2. Under this state, the electric potential was changed, and a C-V curve was measured. A reduction current by CO2 reduction reaction was evaluated by taking a difference between the C-V curve in the state (2) (the state saturated with CO2 ) and the C-V curve in the state (1) (the state that CO2 was excluded).
In this figure, the state that the current value (vertical axis) is negative shows that CO2 reduction reaction occurred. As shown in
Next, the product of the reduction reaction of CO2 using the electrode on which the boride particles was supported was analyzed. For the analysis of gas components, a gas chromatograph of the hydrogen flame ion detector (FID) method was employed, and for the analysis of liquid components, a liquid chromatograph of the UV detection method was employed.
The measurement result of formic acid (HCOOH) by the liquid chromatograph is shown in
As another CO2 reduction electrode catalyst material, similar experiments were conducted with the use of calcium hexaboride (CaB6), barium hexaboride (BaB6), lanthanum hexaboride (LaB6), and cerium hexaboride (CeB6). As a result, similarly to the result obtained in with use of the strontium hexaboride (SrB6), the generation of methane (CH4), ethylene (C2H4), ethan (C2H6) and formic acid (HCOOH) were confirmed. In addition, similarly to the case of SrB6, CO2 reduction current was observed under lower voltage than that of copper.
For a comparison, electrolytic reaction was measured with only the carbon paper (CP) which was used to support a boron particle. As a result, an electric current by the reduction of CO2 was not observed, and it was confirmed that CP was inactive for reducing of CO2. The product by the electrolytic reaction was only hydrogen (H2).
For another comparison, electrolytic reaction was measured with the borides of titanium (Ti) and zirconium (Zr). As a result, hydrogen (H2) was a main product for the experiment, and hydrocarbon or formic acid (HCOOH) as a product by the electrolysis reaction was not generated.
The present device and method provide a novel method for reducing carbon dioxide.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2010-165650 | Jul 2010 | JP | national |
This application is a Continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/JP2011/001520 filed on Mar. 15, 2011, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/JP2011/001520 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 13269074 | US |