The field of the invention generally relates to surface replication, and more particularly to devices and methods for surface replication.
It is often necessary to obtain detailed information regarding surface features of components. This can be required in areas that are only accessible by means of remote tooling or equipment. The detailed information may be required to determine if a component is fit for service based on a particular geometric feature. This would include such things as a flaw or surface defect, where a stress analysis would be required to assess if the stresses resulting from this flaw or defect were acceptable.
Replicas are regularly required to help characterize features on surfaces, such as the inside surface of pressure tubes within a nuclear reactor (e.g., a CANDU™ reactor). Pressure tube surface replication in a nuclear reactor is a remote process due to limited access and the presence of high radiation fields. Obtaining high quality surface replicas of flaws with narrow, deep and/or sharp-tipped features is difficult. Obtaining such replicas remotely and/or in wet conditions is even more difficult. Maintaining control of the replicating material during the replicating process is important; it is important that the replicating material is not ‘lost’ into the reactor during the replication process. Due to this handling constraint, a replicating material with moderately high viscosity must be used. Moderately high viscosity facilitates material handling and control, however, the viscous material is more difficult to apply into narrow, deep and/or sharp-tipped features. Trials with less viscous replicating material have not produced satisfactory results because of the difficulty in material handling/control.
Present replicating devices can be delivered to the location of a flaw to obtain a mould impression or replica of the surface feature. Typically, the device carries a quantity of replicating material and is able to apply the material onto the surface. The replicating material is applied in an uncured state, and cures in situ. Once the replicating material has cured, the device containing the replica is retrieved. The geometry of the surface feature is replicated as a negative impression. The replica can be inspected to determine geometric features.
Present replicating devices and processes generally work adequately for broader, open flaws with smoother surfaces and larger root radii. However, existing devices and processes have limited success with flaws that are narrow, deeper, undercut, and have small root radii. A difficulty with flaw replication relates to being able to successfully apply the replicating material into the bottom of the flaw in order to capture its features. In some instances, the replica may not be fully formed, i.e. it does not sufficiently capture the features of the flaw.
When a successful replica cannot be taken, often the worst case assumptions are made when assessing a putative flaw in a reactor pressure tube. Thus, failure to obtain replicas of sufficient quality can result in additional reactor outage time, limitations on the allowable thermal cycles for reactor pressure tubes, and may lead to unnecessary fuel channel replacement.
There remains a need, therefore, for an improved replication device and methods of use of that device.
This background information is provided for the purpose of making known information believed by the applicant to be of possible relevance to the present invention. No admission is necessarily intended, nor should be construed, that any of the preceding information constitutes prior art against the present invention.
The present invention provides a replication device for delivering a replicating material to a surface.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention there is provided a flaw replication device for remotely obtaining a replica of a surface, comprising: (a) a replicating plate having side walls that define an enclosure having an open end, said replicating plate being movable between a refracted position and an extended position at which the replicating plate is in contact with said surface; (b) a replicating material housing for receiving a curable thixotropic replicating material; (c) an extrusion piston slidably received within said replicating material housing and movable between a rearward position and a forward dispensing position (d) a tube in fluid communication with the enclosure in said replicating plate and the replicating material housing; and (e) an actuator for delivering stress waves to the replicating material, whereby when said replicating plate is in said extended position, movement of said extrusion piston to said forward dispensing position causes replicating material contained within said replicating material housing to be dispensed through said tube into said enclosure formed by said replicating plate and into contact with said surface, and whereby delivery of said stress waves to said replicating material reduces the viscosity of said replicating material.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of making a replica of a surface using the device according to the present invention, comprising the steps of (a) delivering a curable thixotropic material to said surface; (b) providing stress waves to said material during delivery of said material; and (c) allowing said material to cure in the absence of said stress waves.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is provided a kit for the use of a flaw replication device of the present invention, comprising; a) the replication device; and b) instructions for the use thereof.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is provided a kit for the use of a flaw replication device of the present invention, comprising: a) the replication device; b) a curable thixotropic material; and c) instructions for the use thereof.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is provided a kit for the use of a flaw replication device with an actuator, comprising: (a) the actuator; and (b) instructions for the use thereof.
The numbers in bold face type serve to identify the component parts that are described and referred to in relation to the drawings depicting various embodiments of the present invention. It should be noted that in describing various embodiments of the present invention, the same reference numerals have been used to identify the same or similar elements. Moreover, for the sake of simplicity, parts have been omitted from some figures of the drawings.
As will be discussed in more detail below, the present invention provides a replication device, and method, for surface replication. The device of the present invention comprises some of the features of standard replicating devices known in the art. As in certain replicating devices known in the art, the device of the present invention makes use of a device body, a replicating plate, an extendable mount, a replicating cartridge housing and an extrusion piston. In the device of the present invention, these features are combined with an actuator for delivering vibrations in the form of stress waves to a thixotropic replicating material, during material application. Thixotropy refers to a physical property of a material whereby the viscosity of the material is affected by stress. A thixotropic material becomes less viscous in the presence of stress. The temporary reduction in viscosity of the replicating material during injection allows the replicating material to better penetrate into flaws during the injection process. Once the initial injection is complete the vibration induced stresses are removed, which restores the higher viscosity in order to maintain control of the material inside the reactor.
Replicating Device
One example of the replicating device of the present invention is shown in
The main components of the replicating device 10 include: device body 1; replicating plate 2, extendable mount 3; replicating cartridge housing 11, extrusion piston 6 and piezo-actuator 7.
Device body 1 provides support for the components of replicating device 10. In the example of
Replicating plate 2 acts as a dam and retains replicating material 4 at, or generally surrounding, the feature being replicated. Replicating plate 2 includes sidewalls that define an enclosure having an open end and is movable between a retracted position and an extended position. In the extended position, the side walls of replicating plate 2 are in contact with the surface to be replicated such that the enclosure defined by the sidewalls is closed and suitable for delivering the replicating material into contact with the surface to be replicated. Replicating plate 2 optionally includes retaining means (not shown) that ensures the cured replicating material adheres to replicating plate 2 when replicating plate 2 is retracted and the replica is removed from the component being replicated. In one example, as shown in
Replicating plate 2 is removably mounted to extendable mount 3. Extendable mount 3 is moveable from a retracted position to an extended position, and is adapted to reversibly retract and extend replicating plate 2. Extendable mount 3 is remotely user operable to extend replicating plate 2 into contact with the surface prior to replication, and to retract replicating plate 2 once the replica is obtained. Extendable mount 3 optionally includes means for tilting replicating plate 2 to keep replicating plate 2 in contact with the inside surface of a pressure tube or other surface. In one example, replicating plate 2 is pivotally attached to extendable mount 3. The ability of replicating plate 2 to tilt is advantageous if the inside surface of the component is irregularly shaped, such as in the case of a sagged pressure tube.
Extendable mount 3 and replicating plate 2 may optionally be spring loaded to retract as a failsafe mechanism. Such a failsafe mechanism is a safety redundancy which is desirable in the event of a power failure, malfunction or other failure occurs with the extendable mount 3 or its control system. If such a malfunction were to occur with extendable mount 3 in the extended position, it may be difficult to remove the replicating device 10 from the reactor. To help to avoid this possibility, extendable mount 3 can be spring-loaded so that it will return to the retracted position on its own. For example, in the event of a pneumatic or hydraulic system problem (e.g., an O-ring seal leak in extendable mount 3, solenoid valve malfunction or tubing failure in the controlling system outside of the replicating device) extendable mount 3 and replicating plate 2 will retract to ensure the device can be easily retrieved from the pressure tube. Additionally, the front and rear edges of extendable mount 3 and replicating plate 2 may be shaped (for example, tapered) to facilitate removal of device 10 from a pressure tube under back-out conditions.
Movement of extendable mount 3 from the retracted position to the extended position causes replicating plate 2 to move from a retracted position (as depicted in
Housing 11 is sized to receive a supply of replicating material 4 in a replicating material cartridge and in an amount sufficient to form at least one replica. In the specific example depicted in
The properties and/or criteria considered for selecting a thixotropic material includes the percent shrinkage of the material, dimensional stability, radiation tolerance, mixing method(s), affinity to water, working time, cure time, temperature range, viscosity, chemical composition, physical form, and mechanical properties.
It will be clear to the skilled worker that when evaluating the above-noted properties and/or criteria, it is necessary to find a balance among them. Often a specific material will have desirable characteristics with respect to one criterion, and not with another. The overall evaluation must consider whether shortcomings of a particular material are offset by other positive characteristics, in particular, in relation to the specific application. Criteria that should be considered, include:
Tube 5 connects double syringe 9 to an orifice (not shown) in replicating plate 2. Tube 5 has a first end that is attached to the double syringe injection port (not shown), and a second end that is attached to an orifice in replicating plate 2. In accordance with a specific embodiment of the present invention, tube 5 includes a mixing tube X in which components of the replication material are mixed and a delivery tube Y through which the mixed material passes before going through the orifice in the replication plate. Internal baffles 12 in mixing tube X ensure that the components of the material flow together and are adequately mixed during material extrusion and delivery. The skilled worker will be familiar with features other than, or in addition to, baffles 12 that will promote mixing.
Extrusion piston 6 is movable from a retracted position to a dispensing position. When moved from the retracted position to the dispensing position, extrusion piston 6 is adapted to extrude material 4 from syringe 9 forcing it through tube 5 and through the orifice in replicating plate 2 in to the enclosure. In the examples depicted in the Figures, extrusion piston 6 includes dual plungers each individually received within a barrel of the double syringe. Extrusion piston 6 can be, for example, a pneumatic or hydraulic piston.
Actuator 7 is operable to transmit vibrations as stress wave of sufficient amplitude to replicating material 4 so as to cause a reduction in the viscosity of replicating material 4 during material injection. In the example of the Figures, actuator 7 is a piezo-actuator. The piezo-actuator is operable over a range of frequencies, from about 10 Hz to greater than 2000 Hz. In the embodiment in which the replicating material used is Express Vinyl Polysiloxsane Impression Material System from 3M, desirably the actuator produces vibrations at about 60 Hz. The use of actuator 7 results in a temporary reduction in the viscosity of replicating material 4 during injection, which enables replicating material 4 to penetrate into the features of the surface being replicated. In the example depicted in the Figures, actuator 7 is positioned adjacent to replicating plate 2 so as to impart stress waves to material 4 during delivery of the material to the surface. A signal generator and amplifier (not shown) are connected to the piezo-actuator using electrical signal cables and are used to control the piezo-actuator remotely from the replicating device.
It will be clear to the skilled worker to select materials for replicating device 10 that are suitable for the conditions in which replication device 10 will be utilized. Desirably, material for mechanical components are selected for their suitability for use inside CANDU™ reactors (i.e., no halogens, no sulphur, no cobalt) as well as their corrosion resistance, and mechanical durability. Stainless Steel (Type 304 & Type 17-4 PH) and Aluminum (Type 7075 & Type 6061) are examples of materials that may be used. Additionally, materials can be selected based on their acceptance and approval from reactor operators and appropriate regulatory bodies.
Method for Obtaining a Replica
The following steps may be performed to obtain a replica using the replication device. It should be appreciated that although this discussion is specific to flaw replication in a pressure tube, the present method is useful for replication of a portion of any surface. Flaw replication in a pressure tube is described as a specific example to demonstrate the use of the method of the present invention.
As part of routine surveillance, or when a flaw is suspected, an internal surface of a pressure tube may be remotely inspected by a variety of methods including, but not limited to, visual detection and characterization by video camera, surface profiling by ultrasonics and/or volumetric flaw characterization by eddy current analysis. When a flaw is detected, or suspected, the internal surface feature may be characterized by replication.
Prior to insertion of device 10 into a defuelled pressure tube, double-syringe 9, containing uncured thixotropic replicating material 4 is mounted in device body 1. Extendable mount 3 and extrusion piston 6 are both in the retracted position (as shown in
Extrusion piston 6 is actuated to extrude material 4 from double syringe 9. The two-part material is forced through tube 5 and the mixture is injected into the volume of space defined by the surface and replicating plate 2. Actuator 7 is operated during material injection to temporarily lower the viscosity of material 4. Actuator 7 is turned off once injection is complete.
Following injection of the material, replication device 1 remains stationary to allow the replicating material to cure. The typical cure time for Express Vinyl Polysiloxsane Impression Material System from 3M is approximately ten minutes. It will be well understood by the skilled worker that cure times vary depending on the replicating material used, and/or the overall conditions.
Typically, each replica requires the use of a separate replicating plate and a new cartridge of material. However, a single cartridge may contain sufficient material for multiple applications. In this case, extrusion piston 6 is extended only enough to extrude sufficient material to fill the volume of space defined by replicating plate 2.
Once the material has cured, and a replica has been formed (not shown), piston 3 is retracted, thereby retracting replicating plate 2 and withdrawing the formed replica. Replication device 10 is then retrieved from the pressure tube, thereby permitting the replica to be inspected.
Replicating Device Kit
It is also an aspect of the present invention to provide a kit for the use and/or assembly of the flaw replication device. The kit provides a replication device and instructions for the use thereof, and optionally includes replicating material. Another example of a kit includes an actuator, preferably a piezo-actuator, with instructions for adapting the actuator for use with a flaw replication device that lacks an actuator for imparting stress waves to the replicating material. In this instance, the kit allows previous replication devices to be “retrofitted” with such an actuator.
All publications, patents and patent applications referred to in this Specification are indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains and are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2567936 | Nov 2006 | CA | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1953452 | Wertz | Apr 1934 | A |
2155334 | Sitkin et al. | Apr 1939 | A |
2349607 | Berger | May 1944 | A |
2416441 | Grant et al. | Feb 1947 | A |
2428773 | Beresin et al. | Oct 1947 | A |
2452903 | Coffey | Nov 1948 | A |
2458145 | Coffey | Jan 1949 | A |
2524737 | Sawyer | Oct 1950 | A |
2587476 | Huhn | Feb 1952 | A |
2601703 | Sawyer | Jul 1952 | A |
2618014 | Sawyer et al. | Nov 1952 | A |
2653474 | Santiago | Sep 1953 | A |
2667070 | Sockman et al. | Jan 1954 | A |
2764556 | Sockman et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
2797179 | Reynolds et al. | Jun 1957 | A |
3046601 | Hubbert et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3049752 | Jorda et al. | Aug 1962 | A |
3326293 | Skipper | Jun 1967 | A |
3357104 | Greene et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
3364993 | Skipper | Jan 1968 | A |
3417971 | Blank et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3436828 | Dragan | Apr 1969 | A |
3445759 | Pevar | May 1969 | A |
3530587 | Anderson | Sep 1970 | A |
3546130 | Magdalin | Dec 1970 | A |
3722097 | Colman et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3738006 | Lopez et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3767085 | Cannon et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3776989 | Annis, Jr. et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3830094 | Leger | Aug 1974 | A |
3841932 | Forler et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3855854 | Hutchison et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3862047 | Weltman | Jan 1975 | A |
3894823 | Hanning | Jul 1975 | A |
3905227 | Kinley | Sep 1975 | A |
3947177 | Eckardt | Mar 1976 | A |
3963654 | Hutchison et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3966871 | Schroder | Jun 1976 | A |
3978716 | Kirschke | Sep 1976 | A |
3983906 | Hutchison et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
3993520 | Werner et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
3995483 | Hartong et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4014966 | Hanning | Mar 1977 | A |
4043740 | Gellert | Aug 1977 | A |
4106887 | Yasuike et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4124547 | Hutchison et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4132516 | Story | Jan 1979 | A |
4188724 | Lichon | Feb 1980 | A |
4198362 | Ticker et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4200478 | Jacino et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4207282 | Grisch | Jun 1980 | A |
4212627 | Gellert | Jul 1980 | A |
4255140 | Marshall | Mar 1981 | A |
4264305 | Rasmussen et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4286941 | Gellert | Sep 1981 | A |
4302499 | Grisch | Nov 1981 | A |
4303608 | Ticker et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4340562 | Gross et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4346588 | Tuttle | Aug 1982 | A |
4349324 | Neff et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4378211 | Lococo | Mar 1983 | A |
4380426 | Wiles | Apr 1983 | A |
4382785 | Lococo | May 1983 | A |
4385015 | Klettke | May 1983 | A |
4419305 | Matles | Dec 1983 | A |
4433969 | Gellert | Feb 1984 | A |
4472141 | Dragan | Sep 1984 | A |
4483675 | Marshall | Nov 1984 | A |
4492576 | Dragan | Jan 1985 | A |
4531914 | Spinello | Jul 1985 | A |
4538920 | Drake | Sep 1985 | A |
4541976 | Batigne et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4555295 | Orikasa et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4569662 | Dragan | Feb 1986 | A |
4569815 | Rentz et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4597727 | Birkhauser, III | Jul 1986 | A |
4616987 | Boyers et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4619613 | Dragan | Oct 1986 | A |
4659530 | Boyers et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4681520 | Birkhauser, III | Jul 1987 | A |
4692291 | Angell, Jr. | Sep 1987 | A |
4732204 | Tabardin | Mar 1988 | A |
4753536 | Spehar et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4753695 | Alexander et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4759211 | Longley-Cook | Jul 1988 | A |
4775305 | Alexander et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4783295 | Kearns et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4784607 | Francois | Nov 1988 | A |
4840551 | Lay et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4851169 | Lay et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4861401 | Miura et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4919603 | Herold et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4961883 | Jacino et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4963095 | Weissman | Oct 1990 | A |
4995540 | Colin et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5026510 | Yashima | Jun 1991 | A |
5033650 | Colin et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5058769 | Kurtz | Oct 1991 | A |
5122042 | Einiger | Jun 1992 | A |
5122056 | Barbee | Jun 1992 | A |
5122313 | Yashima | Jun 1992 | A |
5174937 | Tamura et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5209935 | Jacino et al. | May 1993 | A |
5234633 | Imataki et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5244388 | Frush | Sep 1993 | A |
5275776 | Hara et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5324186 | Bakanowski | Jun 1994 | A |
5342190 | Salter | Aug 1994 | A |
5344302 | Beehler et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5344304 | Tamura et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5389313 | Imataki et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5401152 | Jacino et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5413258 | Kartler | May 1995 | A |
5424020 | Hara et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5554800 | Jonsson | Sep 1996 | A |
5566860 | Schiltz et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5622726 | Tanner | Apr 1997 | A |
5622728 | Kartler | Apr 1997 | A |
5653534 | Matsumoto et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5670180 | Mackey et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5695339 | Abere | Dec 1997 | A |
5722829 | Wilcox et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5743436 | Wilcox et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5798128 | Dumazet et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5816804 | Fischer | Oct 1998 | A |
5819988 | Sawhney et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5897882 | Gonzalez et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5944226 | Schiltz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954901 | Henderson | Sep 1999 | A |
6065645 | Sawhney et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068043 | Clark | May 2000 | A |
6074582 | Jacino et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6105822 | Larsen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110401 | Lee et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6116905 | Hoos | Sep 2000 | A |
6190150 | Beveridge | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200054 | Chen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234359 | Brown et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6287490 | Rheinberger et al. | Sep 2001 | B2 |
6287491 | Kilim et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309493 | Braun et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331266 | Powell et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336359 | Kawazoe et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342178 | Matsuoka et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6394314 | Sawhney et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398761 | Bills et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6478561 | Braun et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6484570 | Kawazoe et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485281 | Curl | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491855 | Harper | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6589036 | Rawlins et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6607683 | Harrington | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6626912 | Speitling | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6641767 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663371 | Curl | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676408 | Bushnell et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685784 | Jacino et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6730246 | Price et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6769913 | Hurson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786724 | Kwong | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6817861 | Roetzer | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6843652 | Xie et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845809 | Norville et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
20010001510 | Rheinberger et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010011783 | Stecker | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010054474 | Braun et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020000450 | Brown et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020031564 | Beveridge | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020033044 | Kawazoe et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020043732 | Jacino et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020053756 | Powell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058080 | Curl | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087164 | Speitling | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106610 | Hurson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113334 | Matsuoka et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020163096 | Price | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020193502 | Hare | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030157347 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030205831 | Rawlins et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040043093 | Price et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040046280 | Harrington | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065976 | Sreenivasan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070106 | Harrington | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096802 | Gittleman | May 2004 | A1 |
20040110112 | Xie et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040130057 | Mehrabi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142150 | Bharadwaj et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040145086 | Yusa | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040183234 | Colea | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040222349 | Powell et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040241606 | Diesso | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262332 | Pauser et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050017412 | Maier et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028917 | Rawlins et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042420 | Rawlins et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048265 | Bharadwaj et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050163881 | Pierick et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167863 | Bharadwai et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050173839 | Crump et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060001330 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060048832 | Blackmore et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1005755 | Feb 1977 | CA |
1007078 | Mar 1977 | CA |
1067660 | Dec 1979 | CA |
1071822 | Feb 1980 | CA |
1090082 | Nov 1980 | CA |
1092768 | Jan 1981 | CA |
1097872 | Mar 1981 | CA |
1115015 | Dec 1981 | CA |
1118242 | Feb 1982 | CA |
1132814 | Oct 1982 | CA |
1136815 | Dec 1982 | CA |
1139917 | Jan 1983 | CA |
1162712 | Feb 1984 | CA |
1170014 | Jul 1984 | CA |
1170015 | Jul 1984 | CA |
1174820 | Sep 1984 | CA |
1190018 | Jul 1985 | CA |
1214612 | Dec 1986 | CA |
1232244 | Feb 1988 | CA |
1235559 | Apr 1988 | CA |
1240288 | Aug 1988 | CA |
1303314 | Dec 1988 | CA |
1318999 | May 1989 | CA |
2007976 | Jan 1990 | CA |
2046302 | Feb 1990 | CA |
2039160 | Aug 1990 | CA |
2027741 | Oct 1990 | CA |
2145611 | Mar 1995 | CA |
2238766 | May 1996 | CA |
2275510 | Dec 1997 | CA |
2235220 | Apr 1998 | CA |
2480025 | Jul 1998 | CA |
2341425 | Aug 1999 | CA |
2311815 | Oct 1999 | CA |
2349603 | May 2000 | CA |
2361468 | Aug 2000 | CA |
2318011 | Sep 2000 | CA |
2391102 | May 2001 | CA |
2458349 | Mar 2003 | CA |
2460871 | May 2003 | CA |
2481388 | Oct 2003 | CA |
2497875 | Mar 2004 | CA |
2494535 | May 2004 | CA |
2120948 | Dec 2004 | CA |
2189395 | Jul 2005 | CA |
2242817 | Oct 2006 | CA |
2410534 | Feb 2007 | CA |
199 05 761 | Aug 2000 | DE |
0 337 700 | Oct 1989 | EP |
2 008 023 | May 1979 | GB |
2 366 620 | Mar 2002 | GB |
11-352051 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2005351733 | Dec 2005 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Final Rejection,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2007-10846, dated Apr. 21, 2014, English language Translation. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of a Requisition,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,567,936, dated Jan. 23, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150147426 A1 | May 2015 | US |