This application claims foreign priority benefits under 35 U.S.C. §119(a)-(d) to DE 10 2011 081 456.6, filed Aug. 24, 2011, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a device and a method for optical traffic sign detection and driver alerting.
In order to support the driver of a motor vehicle in fulfilling his tasks in road traffic, methods for automatic traffic sign recognition and driver alerting with the aid of a suitable optical-based detection system have recently been developed and brought onto the market by diverse original parts manufacturers and by manufacturers of portable navigation units.
Portable navigation systems are typically based on signals from satellite-based systems (GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, etc.) in conjunction with map data in order to supply the driver with information regarding traffic signs (as recorded in the map data base). Other proposed systems make use of a camera-based optical recognition in order to improve the recognition and robustness. In contrast thereto, the vehicle manufacturers themselves chiefly make use of front view camera devices and signal combination with data that relate to the current driving state of the vehicle. Signal combination with navigation devices is also proposed as an option.
In many cases speed restrictions and signs for regulating overtaking maneuvers after the respective road has been left no longer pertain to a vehicle and hence are no longer valid. Alerting of the driver to such traffic information therefore becomes superfluous after turning-off maneuvers. Furthermore, exit ramps, particularly on freeways, have associated speed restrictions that frequently occur as a sequence of maximum speeds decreasing in stepwise fashion. However, when the respective exit ramp is not used by the driver, incorrect speed restrictions are communicated to the driver.
The above described limitations are more or less strongly pronounced, depending on the concept respectively realized in the particular case. Said limitations are to be considered in particular in this case when the aim is to dispense with the combination of a plurality of detection devices. On the other hand, the use of only a single environmental detection device is preferred from the point of view of cost, and also in order to increase the detection rates of the respective traffic sign recognition system.
Whereas the recognition of traffic signs by means of a camera or with the aid of navigation devices is generally known, there is to date no known effective and practical filtering and suppressing logic for solving the above described problems.
In a first disclosed embodiment, a method comprises operating an optical system on-board a vehicle to detect a traffic sign and determine information related to the sign, determining driving situation information of the vehicle, and using the driving situation information along with the sign information to determine a probability that the sign is pertinent for the vehicle in view of the current driving situation. If the probability of pertinence is above a threshold level, the presence of the sign is communicated to the driver. If the probability of pertinence is below the threshold level, the presence of the sign is not communicated to the driver.
The sign information may comprise at least one of a type of sign, a limit value prescribed by the sign, a position of the sign, and a restriction of the sign defined by an additional sign.
The driving situation information may comprise at least one of a driving speed, a yaw rate, a steering wheel angle, a status of a vehicle navigation system, and a distance travelled by the vehicle.
The probability of the pertinence of the traffic sign is further determined in on the basis of lane-specific information. The lane specific information may be, for example, related to at least one of a freeway exit ramp start and a freeway exit ramp end or related to performance of a lane change by the vehicle.
In another disclosed embodiment, a method of determining whether to alert a driver of a vehicle to a traffic sign comprises operating an optical system on-board the vehicle to detect the traffic sign and determine information related to the sign, monitoring driving maneuvers carried out by the vehicle to determine driving situation information, and using the driving situation information and the traffic sign information to determine a probability that the sign is pertinent for the vehicle. If the probability is above a threshold, the driver is alerted to the traffic sign.
In another disclosed embodiment, apparatus for determining whether the presence of a traffic sign is to be communicated to a driver of a vehicle comprises a camera system detecting the traffic sign and generating traffic sign information, a vehicle system generating driving situation information, and a recognition module receiving the traffic sign information from the camera and receiving the driving situation information from the vehicle system. The recognition module determining from the traffic sign information and the driving situation information a probability that the traffic sign is pertinent for the vehicle, and communicates presence of the traffic sign to the driver if the probability is above a threshold level.
Embodiments of the present invention described herein are recited with particularity in the appended claims. However, other features will become more apparent, and the embodiments may be best understood by referring to the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
The disclosed apparatus and method is based on the concept of rejecting and/or suppressing recognized traffic signs as a function of a) the vehicle/driver behavior and b) the lane information, it being possible to attain a high traffic sign coverage in the vehicle environment (in the sense of a large driving distance or range for which traffic sign information is still displayed), as well as a high detection rate (in the sense of a large driving distance or range with correctly displayed traffic sign information). In particular, an advantageous and developed use of a camera functionality with functional overreach, as well as of vehicle sensor information is implemented, in particular, in order to relate the driving behavior to recognized and/or displayed traffic signs as well as, if appropriate, to available information regarding the lane conditions.
Merely by way of example (and without restricting the invention hereto) reference is made below to a subgroup of traffic signs, specifically speed limits, if appropriate with information relating to specific restrictions.
In particular, the disclosed method defines a suppression or filtering logic that determines in accordance with the following equation (1) the probability that a detected traffic sign is pertinent to the host vehicle under the current situation, this being dependent on at least the driving situation (DS) and the recognized traffic sign (TSn), for example ignoring traffic signs at exit ramps:
pTS=ƒ(TSn,DS) (1)
A detected traffic sign can be accepted (considered pertinent) or rejected (not non-pertinent) depending on whether or not the determined probability reaches/exceeds a threshold value. A pertinent traffic sign is displayed or otherwise communicated to the vehicle driver (audibly or haptically, for example), while a non-pertinent sign is not communicated to the driver. In some cases, a detected traffic sign that cannot be immediately rejected is discarded depending on the further conditions such as exit ramp situations.
In accordance with the following equation (2), the traffic sign information TS. can comprise data relating to the type (T) of traffic sign, a limit value (V) prescribed by the traffic sign, and a position (P) of the traffic sign. Possible restrictions (q), which are typically described in the form of additional signs, can be provided on the respective traffic sign. Restrictive traffic signs such as, for example, exit lane arrows, are used in order to define the probability value more precisely.
TSn=ƒ(T, V, P, q) (2)
In accordance with the following equation (3), the information that refers to the driving situation DS of the vehicle containing the system (the host vehicle) can comprise the driving speed (v), the yaw rate (Y), the steering wheel angle (SWA), the status of a vehicle navigation system (TI), and the distance or route travelled by the vehicle (x).
DS=ƒ(Y,TSE,v,LI,SWA,TI,x) (3)
In addition, it is possible to use lane-specific data which include further features in the form of lane information (LI). Use is made of freeway exit ramp start (ERS) and freeway exit ramp end (ERE) as well as lane change information, which are usually available from lane keeping/departure warning algorithms that run in the front view camera. The camera should additionally supply information relating to the traffic style (right-hand traffic/left-hand traffic) by means of a traffic style estimation (TSE) algorithm, if these data are not available on the vehicle bus.
In accordance with
The following functionalities can be implemented in one exemplary disclosed embodiment, reference being made to
In accordance with one embodiment, speed limit signs can be interpreted as referring to a freeway exit ramp when the following conditions are fulfilled (the variables subsequently named being illustrated in
all speed limits are located on the right-hand side (in the case of right-hand traffic; the reverse is true for left-hand traffic);
first optional speed limit (Lim1) before freeway exit ramp start (ERS) is not more distant than max1 from this freeway exit ramp start;
maximum distance between freeway exit ramp start (ERS) and freeway exit ramp end (ERE)=max2; and
last optional speed limit (LimN) after freeway exit ramp end (ERE) not more distant than max3.
The traffic sign recognition device (TSR module) should suppress all speed limits related to the freeway exit ramp when there has been no turning off onto the freeway exit ramp, that is to say:
when the vehicle does not change lane; or
when the vehicle undertakes a lane change to the left.
The speed limits are handled as usual as long as the vehicle has not turned off onto the freeway exit ramp and other speed limit signs are detected, specifically:
only on the left-hand side as speed limit; or
on both sides as speed limit.
The traffic sign recognition device should communicate the speed limit sign referring to a freeway exit ramp that has last been passed, as soon as there has been a turn off onto the freeway exit ramp, specifically:
when the vehicle undertakes a lane change to the right; or
when the driver operates the driving direction turn signal to the right.
As soon as a turn off has been made onto the freeway exit ramp, all subsequent traffic signs are handled as usual.
Finally, the traffic sign recognition device can discard speed limit signs referring to a freeway exit ramp as soon as the freeway exit ramp end (ERE) has been left.
When no freeway exit ramp end ERE has been detected (for example by a lane detection module or the lane departure warning) within the defined distance max2, the last recognized traffic signs are communicated to the driver in accordance with the usual rule.
In accordance with a further aspect, it is also possible to suppress speed limits that are extremely implausible for specific speeds. When, for example, the imaging device detects a speed limit of 30 km/h while the vehicle is being driven at a speed of 110 km/h, the communication of the 30 km/h speed limit can be suppressed because of the high differential speed.
While exemplary embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 081 456 | Aug 2011 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6472977 | Poechmueller | Oct 2002 | B1 |
8050460 | Mueller-Schneiders et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20040143381 | Regensburger et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20090034798 | Mueller-Schneiders et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090312888 | Sickert et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110109476 | Porikli et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110176002 | Bury | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3619824 | Dec 1987 | DE |
29610677 | Sep 1996 | DE |
29802953 | May 1998 | DE |
19736774 | Feb 1999 | DE |
19829162 | Jan 2000 | DE |
1327969 | Jul 2003 | EP |
2023265 | Feb 2009 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130049988 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |